variance of number of isolated vertices in random graph G(n,p)Covariance of isolated vertices in a random graphWhat is the probability that a random $ntimes n$ bipartite graph has an isolated vertex?Expected number of vertices a distance $k$ away in a random graph?Expected number of triangles in a random graph of size $n$Expected number of isolated vertices for random graph G(n, N)Expected number of vertex-pairs without any simple path in betweenShow that a random graph with edge probability $p=frac10log(n)n$ almost certainly has no isolated vertices…Distance between two vertices picked at random from random graph.Upper Bound on Vertices in SCC Graph of Directed Random GraphCorrelation for random graph (Erdos-Renyi)

Why am I getting a strange double quote (“) in Open Office instead of the ordinary one (")?

Why is Na5 not played in this line of the French Defense, Advance Variation?

Prob. 5, Sec. 6.2, in Bartle & Sherbert's INTRO TO REAL ANALYSIS, 4th ed: How to show this function is strictly decreasing using derivative

Ability To Change Root User Password (Vulnerability?)

Does the Nuka-Cola bottler actually generate nuka cola?

Getting UPS Power from One Room to Another

Should I refuse to be named as co-author of a low quality paper?

Does the new finding on "reversing a quantum jump mid-flight" rule out any interpretations of QM?

How to safely destroy (a large quantity of) valid checks?

Teaching a class likely meant to inflate the GPA of student athletes

Why are MBA programs closing in the United States?

Please figure out this Pan digital Prince

Is it okay to have a sequel start immediately after the end of the first book?

Is it possible to fly backward if you have really strong headwind?

Increase speed altering column on large table to NON NULL

Why does this query, missing a FROM clause, not error out?

Can you make an identity from this product?

Can a differentiable function be real valued at infinite points and complex valued at some other intervals

I've been given a project I can't complete, what should I do?

Is it possible to have 2 different but equal size real number sets that have the same mean and standard deviation?

What aircraft was used as Air Force One for the flight between Southampton and Shannon?

Can we completely replace inheritance using strategy pattern and dependency injection?

Do people with slow metabolism tend to gain weight (fat) if they stop exercising?

What differences exist between adamantine and adamantite in all editions of D&D?



variance of number of isolated vertices in random graph G(n,p)


Covariance of isolated vertices in a random graphWhat is the probability that a random $ntimes n$ bipartite graph has an isolated vertex?Expected number of vertices a distance $k$ away in a random graph?Expected number of triangles in a random graph of size $n$Expected number of isolated vertices for random graph G(n, N)Expected number of vertex-pairs without any simple path in betweenShow that a random graph with edge probability $p=frac10log(n)n$ almost certainly has no isolated vertices…Distance between two vertices picked at random from random graph.Upper Bound on Vertices in SCC Graph of Directed Random GraphCorrelation for random graph (Erdos-Renyi)













2












$begingroup$


Suppose we have random graph $G(n,p)$ from uniform distribution with $n$ vertices and independently, each edge present with probability $p$. Calculating it's expected number of isolated vertices proves quite easy, chance of single vertex to be isolated is equal to $(1-p)^n-1$, then using linearity of probability, expected number of isolated vertices is equal to $ntimes(1-p)^n-1$. However, I am tasked to calculate variance of this number, or at least decent approximation of it, without any idea how to proceed.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Suppose we have random graph $G(n,p)$ from uniform distribution with $n$ vertices and independently, each edge present with probability $p$. Calculating it's expected number of isolated vertices proves quite easy, chance of single vertex to be isolated is equal to $(1-p)^n-1$, then using linearity of probability, expected number of isolated vertices is equal to $ntimes(1-p)^n-1$. However, I am tasked to calculate variance of this number, or at least decent approximation of it, without any idea how to proceed.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Suppose we have random graph $G(n,p)$ from uniform distribution with $n$ vertices and independently, each edge present with probability $p$. Calculating it's expected number of isolated vertices proves quite easy, chance of single vertex to be isolated is equal to $(1-p)^n-1$, then using linearity of probability, expected number of isolated vertices is equal to $ntimes(1-p)^n-1$. However, I am tasked to calculate variance of this number, or at least decent approximation of it, without any idea how to proceed.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose we have random graph $G(n,p)$ from uniform distribution with $n$ vertices and independently, each edge present with probability $p$. Calculating it's expected number of isolated vertices proves quite easy, chance of single vertex to be isolated is equal to $(1-p)^n-1$, then using linearity of probability, expected number of isolated vertices is equal to $ntimes(1-p)^n-1$. However, I am tasked to calculate variance of this number, or at least decent approximation of it, without any idea how to proceed.







      random-graphs






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      Nik4stNik4st

      504




      504




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          I think indicators are easier to work with, as opposed to generating functions, no?



          Let $(I_i:1leqslant i leqslant n)$ be a sequence of Bernoulli random variables, where $I_i$ if and only if vertex $i$ is isolated. Then, $mathbbE[I_i]= (1-p)^n-1triangleq r$. Now, let $N=sum_i =1^n I_i$, the number of isolated vertices. Then,
          $$
          rm var(N) = sum_i=1^n rm var(I_i) + 2sum_i <jrm cov(I_i,I_j) = nrm var(I_i)+ n(n-1)rm cov(I_i I_j).
          $$

          Now, $rm var(I_i)=mathbbE[I_i^2]-mathbbE[I_i]^2 = r-r^2=(1-p)^n-1(1-(1-p)^n-1)$. Next, for $rm cov(I_iI_j)=mathbbE[I_iI_j]-mathbbE[I_i]mathbbE[I_j] = mathbbE[I_iI_j]-(1-p)^2n-2$. Now, for the first object, note that, $I_iI_j=1$ if and only $I_i=I_j=1$, and $0$ otherwise. Note that, $mathbbP(I_iI_j =1)= (1-p)^2n-3$, since the probability that $I_i$ and $I_j$ are both isolated is the probability that, there are no edges between $(n-2)$ vertices to $I_i,I_j$, and there is no edge between $I_i$ and $I_j$. Since the edges are independent, we conclude.



          Thus, the answer is
          $$
          n(1-p)^n-1(1-(1-p)^n-1) + n(n-1)p(1-p)^2n-3.
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            2












            $begingroup$

            Let $P_n,k$ be the probability of exactly $k$ isolated vertices in $G(n,p)$. Look at what happens when we add a new vertex gives:
            $$
            P_n+1,k=q^n P_n,k-1 + (1-q^n-k)q^k P_n,k + sum_i=1^n-kbinomk+iip^iq^kP_n,k+i
            $$

            where




            • $q=1-p$ as usual

            • the first term is the new vertex being isolated

            • the second term is new vertex not isolated but there are $k$ isolated vertices we started off from $G(n,p)$ (so there is an edge from vertex $n+1$ to one of the $n-k$ vertices which gives the $1-q^n-k$ factor, and $n+1$ cannot join to any of the $k$ isolated vertices in $[n]$ so the other factor $q^k$

            • the sum is for starting with a graph of $k+i$ isolated vertices and this new vertex is neighbour to exactly $i$ of these.

            Using this recurrence, you can show the probability generating function of the number of isolated vertices
            $$
            G_n(z):=sum_k=0^n P_n,kz^k
            $$

            satisfies
            $$
            G_n(z)=q^n-1(z-1)G_n-1(z)+G_n-1(1+q(z-1)).
            $$

            This has closed form solution
            $$
            G_n(z)=sum_k=0^nbinomnkq^nk-binomk2(z-1)^k
            $$

            and so you obtain
            $$
            operatornameVar[#textisolated vertices]=nq^n-1((1-q^n-1)+(n-1)pq^n-2).
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3255436%2fvariance-of-number-of-isolated-vertices-in-random-graph-gn-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3












              $begingroup$

              I think indicators are easier to work with, as opposed to generating functions, no?



              Let $(I_i:1leqslant i leqslant n)$ be a sequence of Bernoulli random variables, where $I_i$ if and only if vertex $i$ is isolated. Then, $mathbbE[I_i]= (1-p)^n-1triangleq r$. Now, let $N=sum_i =1^n I_i$, the number of isolated vertices. Then,
              $$
              rm var(N) = sum_i=1^n rm var(I_i) + 2sum_i <jrm cov(I_i,I_j) = nrm var(I_i)+ n(n-1)rm cov(I_i I_j).
              $$

              Now, $rm var(I_i)=mathbbE[I_i^2]-mathbbE[I_i]^2 = r-r^2=(1-p)^n-1(1-(1-p)^n-1)$. Next, for $rm cov(I_iI_j)=mathbbE[I_iI_j]-mathbbE[I_i]mathbbE[I_j] = mathbbE[I_iI_j]-(1-p)^2n-2$. Now, for the first object, note that, $I_iI_j=1$ if and only $I_i=I_j=1$, and $0$ otherwise. Note that, $mathbbP(I_iI_j =1)= (1-p)^2n-3$, since the probability that $I_i$ and $I_j$ are both isolated is the probability that, there are no edges between $(n-2)$ vertices to $I_i,I_j$, and there is no edge between $I_i$ and $I_j$. Since the edges are independent, we conclude.



              Thus, the answer is
              $$
              n(1-p)^n-1(1-(1-p)^n-1) + n(n-1)p(1-p)^2n-3.
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                3












                $begingroup$

                I think indicators are easier to work with, as opposed to generating functions, no?



                Let $(I_i:1leqslant i leqslant n)$ be a sequence of Bernoulli random variables, where $I_i$ if and only if vertex $i$ is isolated. Then, $mathbbE[I_i]= (1-p)^n-1triangleq r$. Now, let $N=sum_i =1^n I_i$, the number of isolated vertices. Then,
                $$
                rm var(N) = sum_i=1^n rm var(I_i) + 2sum_i <jrm cov(I_i,I_j) = nrm var(I_i)+ n(n-1)rm cov(I_i I_j).
                $$

                Now, $rm var(I_i)=mathbbE[I_i^2]-mathbbE[I_i]^2 = r-r^2=(1-p)^n-1(1-(1-p)^n-1)$. Next, for $rm cov(I_iI_j)=mathbbE[I_iI_j]-mathbbE[I_i]mathbbE[I_j] = mathbbE[I_iI_j]-(1-p)^2n-2$. Now, for the first object, note that, $I_iI_j=1$ if and only $I_i=I_j=1$, and $0$ otherwise. Note that, $mathbbP(I_iI_j =1)= (1-p)^2n-3$, since the probability that $I_i$ and $I_j$ are both isolated is the probability that, there are no edges between $(n-2)$ vertices to $I_i,I_j$, and there is no edge between $I_i$ and $I_j$. Since the edges are independent, we conclude.



                Thus, the answer is
                $$
                n(1-p)^n-1(1-(1-p)^n-1) + n(n-1)p(1-p)^2n-3.
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  I think indicators are easier to work with, as opposed to generating functions, no?



                  Let $(I_i:1leqslant i leqslant n)$ be a sequence of Bernoulli random variables, where $I_i$ if and only if vertex $i$ is isolated. Then, $mathbbE[I_i]= (1-p)^n-1triangleq r$. Now, let $N=sum_i =1^n I_i$, the number of isolated vertices. Then,
                  $$
                  rm var(N) = sum_i=1^n rm var(I_i) + 2sum_i <jrm cov(I_i,I_j) = nrm var(I_i)+ n(n-1)rm cov(I_i I_j).
                  $$

                  Now, $rm var(I_i)=mathbbE[I_i^2]-mathbbE[I_i]^2 = r-r^2=(1-p)^n-1(1-(1-p)^n-1)$. Next, for $rm cov(I_iI_j)=mathbbE[I_iI_j]-mathbbE[I_i]mathbbE[I_j] = mathbbE[I_iI_j]-(1-p)^2n-2$. Now, for the first object, note that, $I_iI_j=1$ if and only $I_i=I_j=1$, and $0$ otherwise. Note that, $mathbbP(I_iI_j =1)= (1-p)^2n-3$, since the probability that $I_i$ and $I_j$ are both isolated is the probability that, there are no edges between $(n-2)$ vertices to $I_i,I_j$, and there is no edge between $I_i$ and $I_j$. Since the edges are independent, we conclude.



                  Thus, the answer is
                  $$
                  n(1-p)^n-1(1-(1-p)^n-1) + n(n-1)p(1-p)^2n-3.
                  $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I think indicators are easier to work with, as opposed to generating functions, no?



                  Let $(I_i:1leqslant i leqslant n)$ be a sequence of Bernoulli random variables, where $I_i$ if and only if vertex $i$ is isolated. Then, $mathbbE[I_i]= (1-p)^n-1triangleq r$. Now, let $N=sum_i =1^n I_i$, the number of isolated vertices. Then,
                  $$
                  rm var(N) = sum_i=1^n rm var(I_i) + 2sum_i <jrm cov(I_i,I_j) = nrm var(I_i)+ n(n-1)rm cov(I_i I_j).
                  $$

                  Now, $rm var(I_i)=mathbbE[I_i^2]-mathbbE[I_i]^2 = r-r^2=(1-p)^n-1(1-(1-p)^n-1)$. Next, for $rm cov(I_iI_j)=mathbbE[I_iI_j]-mathbbE[I_i]mathbbE[I_j] = mathbbE[I_iI_j]-(1-p)^2n-2$. Now, for the first object, note that, $I_iI_j=1$ if and only $I_i=I_j=1$, and $0$ otherwise. Note that, $mathbbP(I_iI_j =1)= (1-p)^2n-3$, since the probability that $I_i$ and $I_j$ are both isolated is the probability that, there are no edges between $(n-2)$ vertices to $I_i,I_j$, and there is no edge between $I_i$ and $I_j$. Since the edges are independent, we conclude.



                  Thus, the answer is
                  $$
                  n(1-p)^n-1(1-(1-p)^n-1) + n(n-1)p(1-p)^2n-3.
                  $$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 7 hours ago









                  KawaKawa

                  2,334515




                  2,334515





















                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      Let $P_n,k$ be the probability of exactly $k$ isolated vertices in $G(n,p)$. Look at what happens when we add a new vertex gives:
                      $$
                      P_n+1,k=q^n P_n,k-1 + (1-q^n-k)q^k P_n,k + sum_i=1^n-kbinomk+iip^iq^kP_n,k+i
                      $$

                      where




                      • $q=1-p$ as usual

                      • the first term is the new vertex being isolated

                      • the second term is new vertex not isolated but there are $k$ isolated vertices we started off from $G(n,p)$ (so there is an edge from vertex $n+1$ to one of the $n-k$ vertices which gives the $1-q^n-k$ factor, and $n+1$ cannot join to any of the $k$ isolated vertices in $[n]$ so the other factor $q^k$

                      • the sum is for starting with a graph of $k+i$ isolated vertices and this new vertex is neighbour to exactly $i$ of these.

                      Using this recurrence, you can show the probability generating function of the number of isolated vertices
                      $$
                      G_n(z):=sum_k=0^n P_n,kz^k
                      $$

                      satisfies
                      $$
                      G_n(z)=q^n-1(z-1)G_n-1(z)+G_n-1(1+q(z-1)).
                      $$

                      This has closed form solution
                      $$
                      G_n(z)=sum_k=0^nbinomnkq^nk-binomk2(z-1)^k
                      $$

                      and so you obtain
                      $$
                      operatornameVar[#textisolated vertices]=nq^n-1((1-q^n-1)+(n-1)pq^n-2).
                      $$






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        Let $P_n,k$ be the probability of exactly $k$ isolated vertices in $G(n,p)$. Look at what happens when we add a new vertex gives:
                        $$
                        P_n+1,k=q^n P_n,k-1 + (1-q^n-k)q^k P_n,k + sum_i=1^n-kbinomk+iip^iq^kP_n,k+i
                        $$

                        where




                        • $q=1-p$ as usual

                        • the first term is the new vertex being isolated

                        • the second term is new vertex not isolated but there are $k$ isolated vertices we started off from $G(n,p)$ (so there is an edge from vertex $n+1$ to one of the $n-k$ vertices which gives the $1-q^n-k$ factor, and $n+1$ cannot join to any of the $k$ isolated vertices in $[n]$ so the other factor $q^k$

                        • the sum is for starting with a graph of $k+i$ isolated vertices and this new vertex is neighbour to exactly $i$ of these.

                        Using this recurrence, you can show the probability generating function of the number of isolated vertices
                        $$
                        G_n(z):=sum_k=0^n P_n,kz^k
                        $$

                        satisfies
                        $$
                        G_n(z)=q^n-1(z-1)G_n-1(z)+G_n-1(1+q(z-1)).
                        $$

                        This has closed form solution
                        $$
                        G_n(z)=sum_k=0^nbinomnkq^nk-binomk2(z-1)^k
                        $$

                        and so you obtain
                        $$
                        operatornameVar[#textisolated vertices]=nq^n-1((1-q^n-1)+(n-1)pq^n-2).
                        $$






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          Let $P_n,k$ be the probability of exactly $k$ isolated vertices in $G(n,p)$. Look at what happens when we add a new vertex gives:
                          $$
                          P_n+1,k=q^n P_n,k-1 + (1-q^n-k)q^k P_n,k + sum_i=1^n-kbinomk+iip^iq^kP_n,k+i
                          $$

                          where




                          • $q=1-p$ as usual

                          • the first term is the new vertex being isolated

                          • the second term is new vertex not isolated but there are $k$ isolated vertices we started off from $G(n,p)$ (so there is an edge from vertex $n+1$ to one of the $n-k$ vertices which gives the $1-q^n-k$ factor, and $n+1$ cannot join to any of the $k$ isolated vertices in $[n]$ so the other factor $q^k$

                          • the sum is for starting with a graph of $k+i$ isolated vertices and this new vertex is neighbour to exactly $i$ of these.

                          Using this recurrence, you can show the probability generating function of the number of isolated vertices
                          $$
                          G_n(z):=sum_k=0^n P_n,kz^k
                          $$

                          satisfies
                          $$
                          G_n(z)=q^n-1(z-1)G_n-1(z)+G_n-1(1+q(z-1)).
                          $$

                          This has closed form solution
                          $$
                          G_n(z)=sum_k=0^nbinomnkq^nk-binomk2(z-1)^k
                          $$

                          and so you obtain
                          $$
                          operatornameVar[#textisolated vertices]=nq^n-1((1-q^n-1)+(n-1)pq^n-2).
                          $$






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Let $P_n,k$ be the probability of exactly $k$ isolated vertices in $G(n,p)$. Look at what happens when we add a new vertex gives:
                          $$
                          P_n+1,k=q^n P_n,k-1 + (1-q^n-k)q^k P_n,k + sum_i=1^n-kbinomk+iip^iq^kP_n,k+i
                          $$

                          where




                          • $q=1-p$ as usual

                          • the first term is the new vertex being isolated

                          • the second term is new vertex not isolated but there are $k$ isolated vertices we started off from $G(n,p)$ (so there is an edge from vertex $n+1$ to one of the $n-k$ vertices which gives the $1-q^n-k$ factor, and $n+1$ cannot join to any of the $k$ isolated vertices in $[n]$ so the other factor $q^k$

                          • the sum is for starting with a graph of $k+i$ isolated vertices and this new vertex is neighbour to exactly $i$ of these.

                          Using this recurrence, you can show the probability generating function of the number of isolated vertices
                          $$
                          G_n(z):=sum_k=0^n P_n,kz^k
                          $$

                          satisfies
                          $$
                          G_n(z)=q^n-1(z-1)G_n-1(z)+G_n-1(1+q(z-1)).
                          $$

                          This has closed form solution
                          $$
                          G_n(z)=sum_k=0^nbinomnkq^nk-binomk2(z-1)^k
                          $$

                          and so you obtain
                          $$
                          operatornameVar[#textisolated vertices]=nq^n-1((1-q^n-1)+(n-1)pq^n-2).
                          $$







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 7 hours ago









                          user10354138user10354138

                          13.8k21126




                          13.8k21126



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3255436%2fvariance-of-number-of-isolated-vertices-in-random-graph-gn-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                              Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                              199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單