Why do things cool down?How to vizualize a heat pump microscopically?Heat transfer by conduction is not possible for gases?How does cold air move through a roomDoes extreme cold make **everything** extremely brittle?If an object falls - regarding air resistance - does the Potential or Kinetic energy get converted into thermal energy as it is falling?Chardonnay, air versus waterValidity of Carnot's theorem when operating between finite reservoirsWhy don't you get burned by the wood benches in a sauna?Why do cool things warm up slower than hot things cool down?If the first law of thermodynamics ensures conservation of energy, why does it allow systems to lose energy?

Could the Orion project pusher plate model be used for asteroid deflection?

Can Brexit be undone in an emergency?

Carroll's interpretation of 1-forms

EU compensation - fire alarm at the Flight Crew's hotel

Which block cipher parameters should be kept secret?

Is it possible that the shadow of The Moon is a single dot during solar eclipse?

Should I inform my future product owner that there is a good chance that a team member will leave the company soon?

Why are there two bearded faces wearing red hats on my stealth bomber icon?

Floating Point XOR

Manager manipulates my leaves, what's in it for him?

With a 500GB SSD and a 250GB SSD is it possible to mirror a 250GB partition on the 500GB with the 250GB SSD using ZFS?

What do you call the battery slot's ends?

Shortcode under a Shortcode Multiple times Possible?

Can I separate garlic into cloves for storage?

What is the origin of the “clerics can create water” trope?

What's the purpose of autocorrelation?

When would open interest equal trading volume?

How can I check that parent has more than 1 child?

Other than good shoes and a stick, what are some ways to preserve your knees on long hikes?

Is Yang not precluded from conducting his "UBI experiment" as an electoral candidate?

Are lay articles good enough to be the main source of information for PhD research?

How is underwater propagation of sound possible?

Does Mage Hand give away the caster's position?

Which version of the Pigeonhole principle is correct? One is far stronger than the other



Why do things cool down?


How to vizualize a heat pump microscopically?Heat transfer by conduction is not possible for gases?How does cold air move through a roomDoes extreme cold make **everything** extremely brittle?If an object falls - regarding air resistance - does the Potential or Kinetic energy get converted into thermal energy as it is falling?Chardonnay, air versus waterValidity of Carnot's theorem when operating between finite reservoirsWhy don't you get burned by the wood benches in a sauna?Why do cool things warm up slower than hot things cool down?If the first law of thermodynamics ensures conservation of energy, why does it allow systems to lose energy?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








10












$begingroup$


What I've heard from books and other materials is that heat is nothing but the sum of the movement of molecules. So, as you all know, one common myth breaker was "Unlike in movies, you don't get frozen right away when you get thrown into space".



But the thing that bugs me is that things in the universe eventually cool down. How is that possible when there are no other things around to which the molecules can transfer their heat?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Molecules can give off electromagnetic radiation; their energy is transferred to the E.M. field itself. Eventually energy becomes evenly distributed, meaning that there can be no net gain or loss of energy. When that happens, objects will not cool off; entropy is maximised.
    $endgroup$
    – user234461
    13 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The term you're looking for is Black-body radiation. Any object above 0K radiates heat away.
    $endgroup$
    – Tomáš Zato
    12 hours ago

















10












$begingroup$


What I've heard from books and other materials is that heat is nothing but the sum of the movement of molecules. So, as you all know, one common myth breaker was "Unlike in movies, you don't get frozen right away when you get thrown into space".



But the thing that bugs me is that things in the universe eventually cool down. How is that possible when there are no other things around to which the molecules can transfer their heat?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Molecules can give off electromagnetic radiation; their energy is transferred to the E.M. field itself. Eventually energy becomes evenly distributed, meaning that there can be no net gain or loss of energy. When that happens, objects will not cool off; entropy is maximised.
    $endgroup$
    – user234461
    13 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The term you're looking for is Black-body radiation. Any object above 0K radiates heat away.
    $endgroup$
    – Tomáš Zato
    12 hours ago













10












10








10





$begingroup$


What I've heard from books and other materials is that heat is nothing but the sum of the movement of molecules. So, as you all know, one common myth breaker was "Unlike in movies, you don't get frozen right away when you get thrown into space".



But the thing that bugs me is that things in the universe eventually cool down. How is that possible when there are no other things around to which the molecules can transfer their heat?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




What I've heard from books and other materials is that heat is nothing but the sum of the movement of molecules. So, as you all know, one common myth breaker was "Unlike in movies, you don't get frozen right away when you get thrown into space".



But the thing that bugs me is that things in the universe eventually cool down. How is that possible when there are no other things around to which the molecules can transfer their heat?







thermodynamics energy-conservation temperature equilibrium






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









CJ Dennis

4754 silver badges13 bronze badges




4754 silver badges13 bronze badges










asked yesterday









dolcodolco

1631 silver badge6 bronze badges




1631 silver badge6 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Molecules can give off electromagnetic radiation; their energy is transferred to the E.M. field itself. Eventually energy becomes evenly distributed, meaning that there can be no net gain or loss of energy. When that happens, objects will not cool off; entropy is maximised.
    $endgroup$
    – user234461
    13 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The term you're looking for is Black-body radiation. Any object above 0K radiates heat away.
    $endgroup$
    – Tomáš Zato
    12 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Molecules can give off electromagnetic radiation; their energy is transferred to the E.M. field itself. Eventually energy becomes evenly distributed, meaning that there can be no net gain or loss of energy. When that happens, objects will not cool off; entropy is maximised.
    $endgroup$
    – user234461
    13 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The term you're looking for is Black-body radiation. Any object above 0K radiates heat away.
    $endgroup$
    – Tomáš Zato
    12 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
Molecules can give off electromagnetic radiation; their energy is transferred to the E.M. field itself. Eventually energy becomes evenly distributed, meaning that there can be no net gain or loss of energy. When that happens, objects will not cool off; entropy is maximised.
$endgroup$
– user234461
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
Molecules can give off electromagnetic radiation; their energy is transferred to the E.M. field itself. Eventually energy becomes evenly distributed, meaning that there can be no net gain or loss of energy. When that happens, objects will not cool off; entropy is maximised.
$endgroup$
– user234461
13 hours ago




3




3




$begingroup$
The term you're looking for is Black-body radiation. Any object above 0K radiates heat away.
$endgroup$
– Tomáš Zato
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
The term you're looking for is Black-body radiation. Any object above 0K radiates heat away.
$endgroup$
– Tomáš Zato
12 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















26














$begingroup$

You exchange heat with the objects around you.



If the objects around you are hotter than you, you'll heat up.



If the objects around you are cooler than you (neglecting the heat you're generating due to metabolic processes), you'll cool off.



In space, the objects around you (mostly interstellar medium) is cooler than you so you radiate more heat away from you into them than they radiate toward you.



If you were thrown out into space, but very near a star, you might receive more heat from the star more than you could radiate away into space, and you would heat up rather than cooling down.




But the thing which bugs me is that things in the Universe, eventually cool off, and how is that possible, when there's no other things around, to which the molecules transfer their heat?




There are three main heat transfer mechanisms.



conduction is transfer by direct contact between two bodies, or through a body with a temperature gradient across it.



convection is transfer by the flow of a fluid (liquid or gas).



radiation is transfer by the exchange of electromagnetic radiation.



Heat transfer by radiation doesn't require any physical contact between two bodies or any material medium surrounding a body. Radiation is the main heat transfer mechanism for a body floating in space.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$










  • 9




    $begingroup$
    It should be noted that radiation is much less efficient than the other two, which is why space suits, the Space Shuttle and the ISS need big radiators or other cooling systems. This is a bit counter-intuitive given that "everybody knows" space is cold. The reason is that space is also very empty, so there is nothing to conduct to or convect with.
    $endgroup$
    – Jörg W Mittag
    15 hours ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @JörgWMittag AFAIK the space suits aren't even big enough for that - they use disposable coolant, and when you run out (or the fans break down), you die of heatstroke in short order.
    $endgroup$
    – Luaan
    15 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JörgWMittag: What do you mean exactly, "radiation is much less efficient than the other two"? It depends on temperature levels and what's between the two bodies. I hear convection and conduction aren't very efficient to transfer thermal energy between the Sun and Earth.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Duminil
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JörgWMittag very well put and a great real world example is water vs. air and the human body. It's relatively comfortable to get out in 72F/22C air but to get into water of that temperature is extremely cold!
    $endgroup$
    – jwh20
    13 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Most importantly for the question, if there's no object around you, your body radiates infrared anyway, not caring if the radiation will land on the Earth, the Moon, Alpha Centauri or nothing at all.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Duminil
    13 hours ago


















2














$begingroup$

Everything that is not 0 Kelvin radiates electromagnetic energy. In vacuum, this is the only relevant form of heat transfer. The hotter you are, the more you energy you radiate (I believe the relevant equation is given here).



So, the question whether you cool off or heat up in space depends on whether you absorbs more electromagnetic radiation than you give away. So, for instance, if you are orbiting Earth in plain sunlight, you may actually warm up, because there is lot of electromagnetic energy coming from the sun (much of it as visible light).



But if you are in the shadow of the Earth, the amount of energy that comes from night side of Earth and the general direction of the outer space is very low compared the the amount of energy you radiate away at 37ºC, so you cool off and eventually freeze.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$

















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "151"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f503023%2fwhy-do-things-cool-down%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    26














    $begingroup$

    You exchange heat with the objects around you.



    If the objects around you are hotter than you, you'll heat up.



    If the objects around you are cooler than you (neglecting the heat you're generating due to metabolic processes), you'll cool off.



    In space, the objects around you (mostly interstellar medium) is cooler than you so you radiate more heat away from you into them than they radiate toward you.



    If you were thrown out into space, but very near a star, you might receive more heat from the star more than you could radiate away into space, and you would heat up rather than cooling down.




    But the thing which bugs me is that things in the Universe, eventually cool off, and how is that possible, when there's no other things around, to which the molecules transfer their heat?




    There are three main heat transfer mechanisms.



    conduction is transfer by direct contact between two bodies, or through a body with a temperature gradient across it.



    convection is transfer by the flow of a fluid (liquid or gas).



    radiation is transfer by the exchange of electromagnetic radiation.



    Heat transfer by radiation doesn't require any physical contact between two bodies or any material medium surrounding a body. Radiation is the main heat transfer mechanism for a body floating in space.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$










    • 9




      $begingroup$
      It should be noted that radiation is much less efficient than the other two, which is why space suits, the Space Shuttle and the ISS need big radiators or other cooling systems. This is a bit counter-intuitive given that "everybody knows" space is cold. The reason is that space is also very empty, so there is nothing to conduct to or convect with.
      $endgroup$
      – Jörg W Mittag
      15 hours ago






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @JörgWMittag AFAIK the space suits aren't even big enough for that - they use disposable coolant, and when you run out (or the fans break down), you die of heatstroke in short order.
      $endgroup$
      – Luaan
      15 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JörgWMittag: What do you mean exactly, "radiation is much less efficient than the other two"? It depends on temperature levels and what's between the two bodies. I hear convection and conduction aren't very efficient to transfer thermal energy between the Sun and Earth.
      $endgroup$
      – Eric Duminil
      13 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JörgWMittag very well put and a great real world example is water vs. air and the human body. It's relatively comfortable to get out in 72F/22C air but to get into water of that temperature is extremely cold!
      $endgroup$
      – jwh20
      13 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Most importantly for the question, if there's no object around you, your body radiates infrared anyway, not caring if the radiation will land on the Earth, the Moon, Alpha Centauri or nothing at all.
      $endgroup$
      – Eric Duminil
      13 hours ago















    26














    $begingroup$

    You exchange heat with the objects around you.



    If the objects around you are hotter than you, you'll heat up.



    If the objects around you are cooler than you (neglecting the heat you're generating due to metabolic processes), you'll cool off.



    In space, the objects around you (mostly interstellar medium) is cooler than you so you radiate more heat away from you into them than they radiate toward you.



    If you were thrown out into space, but very near a star, you might receive more heat from the star more than you could radiate away into space, and you would heat up rather than cooling down.




    But the thing which bugs me is that things in the Universe, eventually cool off, and how is that possible, when there's no other things around, to which the molecules transfer their heat?




    There are three main heat transfer mechanisms.



    conduction is transfer by direct contact between two bodies, or through a body with a temperature gradient across it.



    convection is transfer by the flow of a fluid (liquid or gas).



    radiation is transfer by the exchange of electromagnetic radiation.



    Heat transfer by radiation doesn't require any physical contact between two bodies or any material medium surrounding a body. Radiation is the main heat transfer mechanism for a body floating in space.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$










    • 9




      $begingroup$
      It should be noted that radiation is much less efficient than the other two, which is why space suits, the Space Shuttle and the ISS need big radiators or other cooling systems. This is a bit counter-intuitive given that "everybody knows" space is cold. The reason is that space is also very empty, so there is nothing to conduct to or convect with.
      $endgroup$
      – Jörg W Mittag
      15 hours ago






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @JörgWMittag AFAIK the space suits aren't even big enough for that - they use disposable coolant, and when you run out (or the fans break down), you die of heatstroke in short order.
      $endgroup$
      – Luaan
      15 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JörgWMittag: What do you mean exactly, "radiation is much less efficient than the other two"? It depends on temperature levels and what's between the two bodies. I hear convection and conduction aren't very efficient to transfer thermal energy between the Sun and Earth.
      $endgroup$
      – Eric Duminil
      13 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JörgWMittag very well put and a great real world example is water vs. air and the human body. It's relatively comfortable to get out in 72F/22C air but to get into water of that temperature is extremely cold!
      $endgroup$
      – jwh20
      13 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Most importantly for the question, if there's no object around you, your body radiates infrared anyway, not caring if the radiation will land on the Earth, the Moon, Alpha Centauri or nothing at all.
      $endgroup$
      – Eric Duminil
      13 hours ago













    26














    26










    26







    $begingroup$

    You exchange heat with the objects around you.



    If the objects around you are hotter than you, you'll heat up.



    If the objects around you are cooler than you (neglecting the heat you're generating due to metabolic processes), you'll cool off.



    In space, the objects around you (mostly interstellar medium) is cooler than you so you radiate more heat away from you into them than they radiate toward you.



    If you were thrown out into space, but very near a star, you might receive more heat from the star more than you could radiate away into space, and you would heat up rather than cooling down.




    But the thing which bugs me is that things in the Universe, eventually cool off, and how is that possible, when there's no other things around, to which the molecules transfer their heat?




    There are three main heat transfer mechanisms.



    conduction is transfer by direct contact between two bodies, or through a body with a temperature gradient across it.



    convection is transfer by the flow of a fluid (liquid or gas).



    radiation is transfer by the exchange of electromagnetic radiation.



    Heat transfer by radiation doesn't require any physical contact between two bodies or any material medium surrounding a body. Radiation is the main heat transfer mechanism for a body floating in space.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    You exchange heat with the objects around you.



    If the objects around you are hotter than you, you'll heat up.



    If the objects around you are cooler than you (neglecting the heat you're generating due to metabolic processes), you'll cool off.



    In space, the objects around you (mostly interstellar medium) is cooler than you so you radiate more heat away from you into them than they radiate toward you.



    If you were thrown out into space, but very near a star, you might receive more heat from the star more than you could radiate away into space, and you would heat up rather than cooling down.




    But the thing which bugs me is that things in the Universe, eventually cool off, and how is that possible, when there's no other things around, to which the molecules transfer their heat?




    There are three main heat transfer mechanisms.



    conduction is transfer by direct contact between two bodies, or through a body with a temperature gradient across it.



    convection is transfer by the flow of a fluid (liquid or gas).



    radiation is transfer by the exchange of electromagnetic radiation.



    Heat transfer by radiation doesn't require any physical contact between two bodies or any material medium surrounding a body. Radiation is the main heat transfer mechanism for a body floating in space.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered yesterday









    The PhotonThe Photon

    11.9k1 gold badge23 silver badges40 bronze badges




    11.9k1 gold badge23 silver badges40 bronze badges










    • 9




      $begingroup$
      It should be noted that radiation is much less efficient than the other two, which is why space suits, the Space Shuttle and the ISS need big radiators or other cooling systems. This is a bit counter-intuitive given that "everybody knows" space is cold. The reason is that space is also very empty, so there is nothing to conduct to or convect with.
      $endgroup$
      – Jörg W Mittag
      15 hours ago






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @JörgWMittag AFAIK the space suits aren't even big enough for that - they use disposable coolant, and when you run out (or the fans break down), you die of heatstroke in short order.
      $endgroup$
      – Luaan
      15 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JörgWMittag: What do you mean exactly, "radiation is much less efficient than the other two"? It depends on temperature levels and what's between the two bodies. I hear convection and conduction aren't very efficient to transfer thermal energy between the Sun and Earth.
      $endgroup$
      – Eric Duminil
      13 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JörgWMittag very well put and a great real world example is water vs. air and the human body. It's relatively comfortable to get out in 72F/22C air but to get into water of that temperature is extremely cold!
      $endgroup$
      – jwh20
      13 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Most importantly for the question, if there's no object around you, your body radiates infrared anyway, not caring if the radiation will land on the Earth, the Moon, Alpha Centauri or nothing at all.
      $endgroup$
      – Eric Duminil
      13 hours ago












    • 9




      $begingroup$
      It should be noted that radiation is much less efficient than the other two, which is why space suits, the Space Shuttle and the ISS need big radiators or other cooling systems. This is a bit counter-intuitive given that "everybody knows" space is cold. The reason is that space is also very empty, so there is nothing to conduct to or convect with.
      $endgroup$
      – Jörg W Mittag
      15 hours ago






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @JörgWMittag AFAIK the space suits aren't even big enough for that - they use disposable coolant, and when you run out (or the fans break down), you die of heatstroke in short order.
      $endgroup$
      – Luaan
      15 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JörgWMittag: What do you mean exactly, "radiation is much less efficient than the other two"? It depends on temperature levels and what's between the two bodies. I hear convection and conduction aren't very efficient to transfer thermal energy between the Sun and Earth.
      $endgroup$
      – Eric Duminil
      13 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JörgWMittag very well put and a great real world example is water vs. air and the human body. It's relatively comfortable to get out in 72F/22C air but to get into water of that temperature is extremely cold!
      $endgroup$
      – jwh20
      13 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Most importantly for the question, if there's no object around you, your body radiates infrared anyway, not caring if the radiation will land on the Earth, the Moon, Alpha Centauri or nothing at all.
      $endgroup$
      – Eric Duminil
      13 hours ago







    9




    9




    $begingroup$
    It should be noted that radiation is much less efficient than the other two, which is why space suits, the Space Shuttle and the ISS need big radiators or other cooling systems. This is a bit counter-intuitive given that "everybody knows" space is cold. The reason is that space is also very empty, so there is nothing to conduct to or convect with.
    $endgroup$
    – Jörg W Mittag
    15 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    It should be noted that radiation is much less efficient than the other two, which is why space suits, the Space Shuttle and the ISS need big radiators or other cooling systems. This is a bit counter-intuitive given that "everybody knows" space is cold. The reason is that space is also very empty, so there is nothing to conduct to or convect with.
    $endgroup$
    – Jörg W Mittag
    15 hours ago




    5




    5




    $begingroup$
    @JörgWMittag AFAIK the space suits aren't even big enough for that - they use disposable coolant, and when you run out (or the fans break down), you die of heatstroke in short order.
    $endgroup$
    – Luaan
    15 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @JörgWMittag AFAIK the space suits aren't even big enough for that - they use disposable coolant, and when you run out (or the fans break down), you die of heatstroke in short order.
    $endgroup$
    – Luaan
    15 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @JörgWMittag: What do you mean exactly, "radiation is much less efficient than the other two"? It depends on temperature levels and what's between the two bodies. I hear convection and conduction aren't very efficient to transfer thermal energy between the Sun and Earth.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Duminil
    13 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @JörgWMittag: What do you mean exactly, "radiation is much less efficient than the other two"? It depends on temperature levels and what's between the two bodies. I hear convection and conduction aren't very efficient to transfer thermal energy between the Sun and Earth.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Duminil
    13 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @JörgWMittag very well put and a great real world example is water vs. air and the human body. It's relatively comfortable to get out in 72F/22C air but to get into water of that temperature is extremely cold!
    $endgroup$
    – jwh20
    13 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @JörgWMittag very well put and a great real world example is water vs. air and the human body. It's relatively comfortable to get out in 72F/22C air but to get into water of that temperature is extremely cold!
    $endgroup$
    – jwh20
    13 hours ago




    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    Most importantly for the question, if there's no object around you, your body radiates infrared anyway, not caring if the radiation will land on the Earth, the Moon, Alpha Centauri or nothing at all.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Duminil
    13 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Most importantly for the question, if there's no object around you, your body radiates infrared anyway, not caring if the radiation will land on the Earth, the Moon, Alpha Centauri or nothing at all.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Duminil
    13 hours ago













    2














    $begingroup$

    Everything that is not 0 Kelvin radiates electromagnetic energy. In vacuum, this is the only relevant form of heat transfer. The hotter you are, the more you energy you radiate (I believe the relevant equation is given here).



    So, the question whether you cool off or heat up in space depends on whether you absorbs more electromagnetic radiation than you give away. So, for instance, if you are orbiting Earth in plain sunlight, you may actually warm up, because there is lot of electromagnetic energy coming from the sun (much of it as visible light).



    But if you are in the shadow of the Earth, the amount of energy that comes from night side of Earth and the general direction of the outer space is very low compared the the amount of energy you radiate away at 37ºC, so you cool off and eventually freeze.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



















      2














      $begingroup$

      Everything that is not 0 Kelvin radiates electromagnetic energy. In vacuum, this is the only relevant form of heat transfer. The hotter you are, the more you energy you radiate (I believe the relevant equation is given here).



      So, the question whether you cool off or heat up in space depends on whether you absorbs more electromagnetic radiation than you give away. So, for instance, if you are orbiting Earth in plain sunlight, you may actually warm up, because there is lot of electromagnetic energy coming from the sun (much of it as visible light).



      But if you are in the shadow of the Earth, the amount of energy that comes from night side of Earth and the general direction of the outer space is very low compared the the amount of energy you radiate away at 37ºC, so you cool off and eventually freeze.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        2














        2










        2







        $begingroup$

        Everything that is not 0 Kelvin radiates electromagnetic energy. In vacuum, this is the only relevant form of heat transfer. The hotter you are, the more you energy you radiate (I believe the relevant equation is given here).



        So, the question whether you cool off or heat up in space depends on whether you absorbs more electromagnetic radiation than you give away. So, for instance, if you are orbiting Earth in plain sunlight, you may actually warm up, because there is lot of electromagnetic energy coming from the sun (much of it as visible light).



        But if you are in the shadow of the Earth, the amount of energy that comes from night side of Earth and the general direction of the outer space is very low compared the the amount of energy you radiate away at 37ºC, so you cool off and eventually freeze.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Everything that is not 0 Kelvin radiates electromagnetic energy. In vacuum, this is the only relevant form of heat transfer. The hotter you are, the more you energy you radiate (I believe the relevant equation is given here).



        So, the question whether you cool off or heat up in space depends on whether you absorbs more electromagnetic radiation than you give away. So, for instance, if you are orbiting Earth in plain sunlight, you may actually warm up, because there is lot of electromagnetic energy coming from the sun (much of it as visible light).



        But if you are in the shadow of the Earth, the amount of energy that comes from night side of Earth and the general direction of the outer space is very low compared the the amount of energy you radiate away at 37ºC, so you cool off and eventually freeze.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 10 hours ago









        lvellalvella

        4702 silver badges15 bronze badges




        4702 silver badges15 bronze badges































            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f503023%2fwhy-do-things-cool-down%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її