Minimum number of lines to draw 111 squares7 Trees, 6 Rows, 3 Per Row?The Erasmus dissection of a squareMinimum cells to fill grid without consecutive neighboursFitting the piecesBigger board with the least squaresTurn on all squaresRemoving matchsticks to remove all squaresColoring the Chess BoardRed and White Squares

Talk about Grandpa's weird talk: Who are these folks?

How far away from you does grass spread?

How can I create folders in folders in terminal

Account creation and log-in system

Is Zack Morris's 'time stop' ability in "Saved By the Bell" a supernatural ability?

Unpredictability of Stock Market

How is underwater propagation of sound possible?

As an employer, can I compel my employees to vote?

What is the maximum viable speed for a projectile within earth's atmosphere?

Statistical tests for benchmark comparison

Inquiry answerer

Plot irregular circle in latex

We suspect colleague is stealing company code - what do we do?

(How long) Should I indulge my new co-workers?

Why would a fighter use the afterburner and air brakes at the same time?

Persuading players to be less attached to a pre-session 0 character concept

Minimum number of lines to draw 111 squares

Which version of the Pigeonhole principle is correct? One is far stronger than the other

Social Encounters in a West Marches Campaign

Who are the people reviewing far more papers than they're submitting for review?

What's the purpose of autocorrelation?

Hobby function generators

How would you design and build an American Civil War Steam Gun?

Could the Orion project pusher plate model be used for asteroid deflection?



Minimum number of lines to draw 111 squares


7 Trees, 6 Rows, 3 Per Row?The Erasmus dissection of a squareMinimum cells to fill grid without consecutive neighboursFitting the piecesBigger board with the least squaresTurn on all squaresRemoving matchsticks to remove all squaresColoring the Chess BoardRed and White Squares






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6












$begingroup$


Find the minimum number of lines to draw 111 squares.



For example you can draw a single square using 4 lines i.e 2 vertical and 2 horizontal.

Similar, you can draw a 2 square grid using 5 lines, and so on.



The solution totally depends on how you smartly draw lines because the same number of squares can be drawn with more or less lines.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How many squares in 2x2 grid (6 lines)? 4 or 5 squares?
    $endgroup$
    – npkllr
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Is it a requirement that the lines are infinite or can I use line segment?
    $endgroup$
    – Helena
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do the lines have to be on an ordinary plane? I can do it with two lines on a mobius strip. :P
    $endgroup$
    – Spitemaster
    5 hours ago

















6












$begingroup$


Find the minimum number of lines to draw 111 squares.



For example you can draw a single square using 4 lines i.e 2 vertical and 2 horizontal.

Similar, you can draw a 2 square grid using 5 lines, and so on.



The solution totally depends on how you smartly draw lines because the same number of squares can be drawn with more or less lines.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How many squares in 2x2 grid (6 lines)? 4 or 5 squares?
    $endgroup$
    – npkllr
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Is it a requirement that the lines are infinite or can I use line segment?
    $endgroup$
    – Helena
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do the lines have to be on an ordinary plane? I can do it with two lines on a mobius strip. :P
    $endgroup$
    – Spitemaster
    5 hours ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$


Find the minimum number of lines to draw 111 squares.



For example you can draw a single square using 4 lines i.e 2 vertical and 2 horizontal.

Similar, you can draw a 2 square grid using 5 lines, and so on.



The solution totally depends on how you smartly draw lines because the same number of squares can be drawn with more or less lines.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Find the minimum number of lines to draw 111 squares.



For example you can draw a single square using 4 lines i.e 2 vertical and 2 horizontal.

Similar, you can draw a 2 square grid using 5 lines, and so on.



The solution totally depends on how you smartly draw lines because the same number of squares can be drawn with more or less lines.







geometry optimization






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









npkllr

5612 silver badges8 bronze badges




5612 silver badges8 bronze badges










asked 9 hours ago









Sayed Mohd AliSayed Mohd Ali

47814 bronze badges




47814 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How many squares in 2x2 grid (6 lines)? 4 or 5 squares?
    $endgroup$
    – npkllr
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Is it a requirement that the lines are infinite or can I use line segment?
    $endgroup$
    – Helena
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do the lines have to be on an ordinary plane? I can do it with two lines on a mobius strip. :P
    $endgroup$
    – Spitemaster
    5 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How many squares in 2x2 grid (6 lines)? 4 or 5 squares?
    $endgroup$
    – npkllr
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Is it a requirement that the lines are infinite or can I use line segment?
    $endgroup$
    – Helena
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do the lines have to be on an ordinary plane? I can do it with two lines on a mobius strip. :P
    $endgroup$
    – Spitemaster
    5 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
How many squares in 2x2 grid (6 lines)? 4 or 5 squares?
$endgroup$
– npkllr
9 hours ago





$begingroup$
How many squares in 2x2 grid (6 lines)? 4 or 5 squares?
$endgroup$
– npkllr
9 hours ago













$begingroup$
Is it a requirement that the lines are infinite or can I use line segment?
$endgroup$
– Helena
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Is it a requirement that the lines are infinite or can I use line segment?
$endgroup$
– Helena
5 hours ago












$begingroup$
Do the lines have to be on an ordinary plane? I can do it with two lines on a mobius strip. :P
$endgroup$
– Spitemaster
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Do the lines have to be on an ordinary plane? I can do it with two lines on a mobius strip. :P
$endgroup$
– Spitemaster
5 hours ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















7














$begingroup$


EDIT: Some have suggested that the question might be to find exactly 111 squares. In this case,




From the table below, one can see that a $6times 6$ grid and a $3times 4$ grid (with a different angle and with a set of intersections located far away from the first one) make a total of $$91+20=111$$
squares, for a total of $7+7+4+5=23$ lines.


enter image description here

Thanks to @Helena in the comments, you can save one line like this:
enter image description here

The gap between lines in the second grid is not a rational multiple of the gap in the first grid, and the small gap between the two grids is a rational multiple of neither. Then the only squares are found within the coloured borders. Total: $23-1=22$ lines



ORIGINAL ANSWER



Let's count




the number of squares in a regular $ptimes q$ grid (that is, with $p+1$ vertical lines and $q+1$ horizontal lines).


There are $p times q$ squares of area 1.
$(p-1)(q-1)$ squares of area 4.

In general, $(p-k)(q-k)$ squares of area $(k+1)^2$ as soon as $p-k$ and $q-k$ are positive.

You see that in general, for the same amount of lines, it is better to have something close to $p=q$ (a big square is better than a long and thin rectangle), because if there are more horizontal lines than vertical lines, then taking a horizontal line to make it vertical will increase the amount of squares of every size.

Indeed,$$(p-k)(q-k)=[pq-(p+q)k+k^2]$$ compared to $$(p+1-k)(q-1-k)=[pq-(p+q)k+k^2]-p+q-1$$ shows that it is worth transferring vertical to horizontal as soon as the difference is bigger than $1$ (and when the difference is $1$ it changes nothing).

The following picture shows you the first values for a $ptimes p$ grid and for a $ptimes (p+1)$ grid.

enter image description here
The smallest amount of lines is therefore $(6+1)+(7+1)=15$ lines.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can safe at least one line by reusing a line of the first grid for your second grid. You can make your squares in the second grid a different size, to not make sure that you are not accidentally creating a new square. E.g. if your grid size is 1 in the first grid, can make it sqrt(2) in the second grid.
    $endgroup$
    – Helena
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Helena Agreed and edited. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    4 hours ago



















4














$begingroup$

I think the best you can do is




$15$ lines




As follows




enter image description here




Counting




42 squares of side length 1

30 squares of side length 2

20 squares of side length 3

12 squares of side length 4

6 squares of side length 5

2 squares of side length 6


42+30+20+12+6+2 = 112







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$










  • 3




    $begingroup$
    How about exactly 111 squares? :P
    $endgroup$
    – Conifers
    8 hours ago


















3














$begingroup$

I got:




16
By having horizontal and vertical lines on a square grid in rows [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] and columns [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10]




Counting:




36 squares of size 1

30 squares of size 2

20 squares of size 3

15 squares of size 4

16 squares of size 5

04 squares of size 6

total: 111 squares




As a picture




>!







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Nice one! Just 1 short of the optimal number for the $geq 111$ version.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, I'd give some more explanation and share my source code. But I haven't figured out how to maintain proper formatting while using the spoiler tag
    $endgroup$
    – Helena
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ArnaudMortier maybe if we combine our approaches we can that number too
    $endgroup$
    – Helena
    4 hours ago


















1














$begingroup$

I assume we have to draw exactly 111 squares.



My answer:




We have to draw a 1x111 grid, so the count is 111+2 = 114 lines. --> Changed my answer to 19 lines.




How I find that:



 class Program

static void Main(string[] args)

Console.WriteLine("***********");
printGrids(111);
Console.WriteLine("***********");
printGrids(112);
Console.WriteLine("***********");


Console.ReadLine();


private static void printGrids(int target)

Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Target: 0", target));
for (int minDiff = 0; minDiff <= target; minDiff++)

bool found = false;
for (int x = 1; x <= target; x++)
for (int y = x; y <= target; y++)

int val = calc(x, y);
int diff = Math.Abs(val - target);
if (diff == minDiff)

Console.WriteLine(string.Format("0x1: 2", x, y, val));
found = true;


if (found)
break;


private static int calc(int x, int y)

int sum = 0;
for (int val = 0; val < Math.Min(x, y); val++)
sum += (x - val) * (y - val);
return sum;





Prints:



***********
Target: 110
1x110: 110
2x37: 110
3x19: 110
4x12: 110
***********
Target: 111
1x111: 111
***********
Target: 112
1x112: 112
6x7: 112
***********


So if 112 is acceptable, using a 6x7 grid (15 lines) would be OK. But if we want exactly 111 squares, 1x111 grid (114 lines) is the only answer.



Edit:
4x12 (18 lines) - is the best answer for 110.
We can add 1 more square to that with 1 line so the answer is 19 lines.



(I cannot see this, I hope you can)
enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    @Arnaud Mortier the "calc" method is what I could formulate to calculate the problem. I've tried it on some cases that I could count and it seems working. And when we try all the cases, there is no solution for 111 except 1x111. This is what I could find, I may be wrong. If you find a mistake for the formulation, it is appreciated.
    $endgroup$
    – Koray
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think that your "mistake" comes from the fact that all your lines are either horizontal or vertical, but that is not a requirement from the problem. It is only something you would do if you want to pass 111 as fast as you can, but not if you want to exactly reach it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Arnaud Mortier yes, my solution only uses vertical and horizontal lines. I would love to see other than that, if there is.
    $endgroup$
    – Koray
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Arnaud Mortier my country does not allow i.stack.imgur.com so I cannot see your picture.. Opera VPN also not working.. I couldn't visualized your answer :(
    $endgroup$
    – Koray
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    That's too bad. I didn't choose the site, it's automatic in StackExchange sites.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    6 hours ago


















-4














$begingroup$

The answer is:




24


For 110 squares I would draw a 10x11 grid, that requires 11+12=23 lines.

Therefore I need 24 lines for the additional 111th square.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$

















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "559"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f89178%2fminimum-number-of-lines-to-draw-111-squares%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7














    $begingroup$


    EDIT: Some have suggested that the question might be to find exactly 111 squares. In this case,




    From the table below, one can see that a $6times 6$ grid and a $3times 4$ grid (with a different angle and with a set of intersections located far away from the first one) make a total of $$91+20=111$$
    squares, for a total of $7+7+4+5=23$ lines.


    enter image description here

    Thanks to @Helena in the comments, you can save one line like this:
    enter image description here

    The gap between lines in the second grid is not a rational multiple of the gap in the first grid, and the small gap between the two grids is a rational multiple of neither. Then the only squares are found within the coloured borders. Total: $23-1=22$ lines



    ORIGINAL ANSWER



    Let's count




    the number of squares in a regular $ptimes q$ grid (that is, with $p+1$ vertical lines and $q+1$ horizontal lines).


    There are $p times q$ squares of area 1.
    $(p-1)(q-1)$ squares of area 4.

    In general, $(p-k)(q-k)$ squares of area $(k+1)^2$ as soon as $p-k$ and $q-k$ are positive.

    You see that in general, for the same amount of lines, it is better to have something close to $p=q$ (a big square is better than a long and thin rectangle), because if there are more horizontal lines than vertical lines, then taking a horizontal line to make it vertical will increase the amount of squares of every size.

    Indeed,$$(p-k)(q-k)=[pq-(p+q)k+k^2]$$ compared to $$(p+1-k)(q-1-k)=[pq-(p+q)k+k^2]-p+q-1$$ shows that it is worth transferring vertical to horizontal as soon as the difference is bigger than $1$ (and when the difference is $1$ it changes nothing).

    The following picture shows you the first values for a $ptimes p$ grid and for a $ptimes (p+1)$ grid.

    enter image description here
    The smallest amount of lines is therefore $(6+1)+(7+1)=15$ lines.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$










    • 1




      $begingroup$
      You can safe at least one line by reusing a line of the first grid for your second grid. You can make your squares in the second grid a different size, to not make sure that you are not accidentally creating a new square. E.g. if your grid size is 1 in the first grid, can make it sqrt(2) in the second grid.
      $endgroup$
      – Helena
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Helena Agreed and edited. Thanks!
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      4 hours ago
















    7














    $begingroup$


    EDIT: Some have suggested that the question might be to find exactly 111 squares. In this case,




    From the table below, one can see that a $6times 6$ grid and a $3times 4$ grid (with a different angle and with a set of intersections located far away from the first one) make a total of $$91+20=111$$
    squares, for a total of $7+7+4+5=23$ lines.


    enter image description here

    Thanks to @Helena in the comments, you can save one line like this:
    enter image description here

    The gap between lines in the second grid is not a rational multiple of the gap in the first grid, and the small gap between the two grids is a rational multiple of neither. Then the only squares are found within the coloured borders. Total: $23-1=22$ lines



    ORIGINAL ANSWER



    Let's count




    the number of squares in a regular $ptimes q$ grid (that is, with $p+1$ vertical lines and $q+1$ horizontal lines).


    There are $p times q$ squares of area 1.
    $(p-1)(q-1)$ squares of area 4.

    In general, $(p-k)(q-k)$ squares of area $(k+1)^2$ as soon as $p-k$ and $q-k$ are positive.

    You see that in general, for the same amount of lines, it is better to have something close to $p=q$ (a big square is better than a long and thin rectangle), because if there are more horizontal lines than vertical lines, then taking a horizontal line to make it vertical will increase the amount of squares of every size.

    Indeed,$$(p-k)(q-k)=[pq-(p+q)k+k^2]$$ compared to $$(p+1-k)(q-1-k)=[pq-(p+q)k+k^2]-p+q-1$$ shows that it is worth transferring vertical to horizontal as soon as the difference is bigger than $1$ (and when the difference is $1$ it changes nothing).

    The following picture shows you the first values for a $ptimes p$ grid and for a $ptimes (p+1)$ grid.

    enter image description here
    The smallest amount of lines is therefore $(6+1)+(7+1)=15$ lines.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$










    • 1




      $begingroup$
      You can safe at least one line by reusing a line of the first grid for your second grid. You can make your squares in the second grid a different size, to not make sure that you are not accidentally creating a new square. E.g. if your grid size is 1 in the first grid, can make it sqrt(2) in the second grid.
      $endgroup$
      – Helena
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Helena Agreed and edited. Thanks!
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      4 hours ago














    7














    7










    7







    $begingroup$


    EDIT: Some have suggested that the question might be to find exactly 111 squares. In this case,




    From the table below, one can see that a $6times 6$ grid and a $3times 4$ grid (with a different angle and with a set of intersections located far away from the first one) make a total of $$91+20=111$$
    squares, for a total of $7+7+4+5=23$ lines.


    enter image description here

    Thanks to @Helena in the comments, you can save one line like this:
    enter image description here

    The gap between lines in the second grid is not a rational multiple of the gap in the first grid, and the small gap between the two grids is a rational multiple of neither. Then the only squares are found within the coloured borders. Total: $23-1=22$ lines



    ORIGINAL ANSWER



    Let's count




    the number of squares in a regular $ptimes q$ grid (that is, with $p+1$ vertical lines and $q+1$ horizontal lines).


    There are $p times q$ squares of area 1.
    $(p-1)(q-1)$ squares of area 4.

    In general, $(p-k)(q-k)$ squares of area $(k+1)^2$ as soon as $p-k$ and $q-k$ are positive.

    You see that in general, for the same amount of lines, it is better to have something close to $p=q$ (a big square is better than a long and thin rectangle), because if there are more horizontal lines than vertical lines, then taking a horizontal line to make it vertical will increase the amount of squares of every size.

    Indeed,$$(p-k)(q-k)=[pq-(p+q)k+k^2]$$ compared to $$(p+1-k)(q-1-k)=[pq-(p+q)k+k^2]-p+q-1$$ shows that it is worth transferring vertical to horizontal as soon as the difference is bigger than $1$ (and when the difference is $1$ it changes nothing).

    The following picture shows you the first values for a $ptimes p$ grid and for a $ptimes (p+1)$ grid.

    enter image description here
    The smallest amount of lines is therefore $(6+1)+(7+1)=15$ lines.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




    EDIT: Some have suggested that the question might be to find exactly 111 squares. In this case,




    From the table below, one can see that a $6times 6$ grid and a $3times 4$ grid (with a different angle and with a set of intersections located far away from the first one) make a total of $$91+20=111$$
    squares, for a total of $7+7+4+5=23$ lines.


    enter image description here

    Thanks to @Helena in the comments, you can save one line like this:
    enter image description here

    The gap between lines in the second grid is not a rational multiple of the gap in the first grid, and the small gap between the two grids is a rational multiple of neither. Then the only squares are found within the coloured borders. Total: $23-1=22$ lines



    ORIGINAL ANSWER



    Let's count




    the number of squares in a regular $ptimes q$ grid (that is, with $p+1$ vertical lines and $q+1$ horizontal lines).


    There are $p times q$ squares of area 1.
    $(p-1)(q-1)$ squares of area 4.

    In general, $(p-k)(q-k)$ squares of area $(k+1)^2$ as soon as $p-k$ and $q-k$ are positive.

    You see that in general, for the same amount of lines, it is better to have something close to $p=q$ (a big square is better than a long and thin rectangle), because if there are more horizontal lines than vertical lines, then taking a horizontal line to make it vertical will increase the amount of squares of every size.

    Indeed,$$(p-k)(q-k)=[pq-(p+q)k+k^2]$$ compared to $$(p+1-k)(q-1-k)=[pq-(p+q)k+k^2]-p+q-1$$ shows that it is worth transferring vertical to horizontal as soon as the difference is bigger than $1$ (and when the difference is $1$ it changes nothing).

    The following picture shows you the first values for a $ptimes p$ grid and for a $ptimes (p+1)$ grid.

    enter image description here
    The smallest amount of lines is therefore $(6+1)+(7+1)=15$ lines.








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 4 hours ago

























    answered 8 hours ago









    Arnaud MortierArnaud Mortier

    5,61913 silver badges48 bronze badges




    5,61913 silver badges48 bronze badges










    • 1




      $begingroup$
      You can safe at least one line by reusing a line of the first grid for your second grid. You can make your squares in the second grid a different size, to not make sure that you are not accidentally creating a new square. E.g. if your grid size is 1 in the first grid, can make it sqrt(2) in the second grid.
      $endgroup$
      – Helena
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Helena Agreed and edited. Thanks!
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      4 hours ago













    • 1




      $begingroup$
      You can safe at least one line by reusing a line of the first grid for your second grid. You can make your squares in the second grid a different size, to not make sure that you are not accidentally creating a new square. E.g. if your grid size is 1 in the first grid, can make it sqrt(2) in the second grid.
      $endgroup$
      – Helena
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Helena Agreed and edited. Thanks!
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      4 hours ago








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    You can safe at least one line by reusing a line of the first grid for your second grid. You can make your squares in the second grid a different size, to not make sure that you are not accidentally creating a new square. E.g. if your grid size is 1 in the first grid, can make it sqrt(2) in the second grid.
    $endgroup$
    – Helena
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    You can safe at least one line by reusing a line of the first grid for your second grid. You can make your squares in the second grid a different size, to not make sure that you are not accidentally creating a new square. E.g. if your grid size is 1 in the first grid, can make it sqrt(2) in the second grid.
    $endgroup$
    – Helena
    5 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @Helena Agreed and edited. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    4 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    @Helena Agreed and edited. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    4 hours ago














    4














    $begingroup$

    I think the best you can do is




    $15$ lines




    As follows




    enter image description here




    Counting




    42 squares of side length 1

    30 squares of side length 2

    20 squares of side length 3

    12 squares of side length 4

    6 squares of side length 5

    2 squares of side length 6


    42+30+20+12+6+2 = 112







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$










    • 3




      $begingroup$
      How about exactly 111 squares? :P
      $endgroup$
      – Conifers
      8 hours ago















    4














    $begingroup$

    I think the best you can do is




    $15$ lines




    As follows




    enter image description here




    Counting




    42 squares of side length 1

    30 squares of side length 2

    20 squares of side length 3

    12 squares of side length 4

    6 squares of side length 5

    2 squares of side length 6


    42+30+20+12+6+2 = 112







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$










    • 3




      $begingroup$
      How about exactly 111 squares? :P
      $endgroup$
      – Conifers
      8 hours ago













    4














    4










    4







    $begingroup$

    I think the best you can do is




    $15$ lines




    As follows




    enter image description here




    Counting




    42 squares of side length 1

    30 squares of side length 2

    20 squares of side length 3

    12 squares of side length 4

    6 squares of side length 5

    2 squares of side length 6


    42+30+20+12+6+2 = 112







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    I think the best you can do is




    $15$ lines




    As follows




    enter image description here




    Counting




    42 squares of side length 1

    30 squares of side length 2

    20 squares of side length 3

    12 squares of side length 4

    6 squares of side length 5

    2 squares of side length 6


    42+30+20+12+6+2 = 112








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 9 hours ago









    hexominohexomino

    61.8k5 gold badges177 silver badges277 bronze badges




    61.8k5 gold badges177 silver badges277 bronze badges










    • 3




      $begingroup$
      How about exactly 111 squares? :P
      $endgroup$
      – Conifers
      8 hours ago












    • 3




      $begingroup$
      How about exactly 111 squares? :P
      $endgroup$
      – Conifers
      8 hours ago







    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    How about exactly 111 squares? :P
    $endgroup$
    – Conifers
    8 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    How about exactly 111 squares? :P
    $endgroup$
    – Conifers
    8 hours ago











    3














    $begingroup$

    I got:




    16
    By having horizontal and vertical lines on a square grid in rows [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] and columns [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10]




    Counting:




    36 squares of size 1

    30 squares of size 2

    20 squares of size 3

    15 squares of size 4

    16 squares of size 5

    04 squares of size 6

    total: 111 squares




    As a picture




    >!







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Nice one! Just 1 short of the optimal number for the $geq 111$ version.
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, I'd give some more explanation and share my source code. But I haven't figured out how to maintain proper formatting while using the spoiler tag
      $endgroup$
      – Helena
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @ArnaudMortier maybe if we combine our approaches we can that number too
      $endgroup$
      – Helena
      4 hours ago















    3














    $begingroup$

    I got:




    16
    By having horizontal and vertical lines on a square grid in rows [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] and columns [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10]




    Counting:




    36 squares of size 1

    30 squares of size 2

    20 squares of size 3

    15 squares of size 4

    16 squares of size 5

    04 squares of size 6

    total: 111 squares




    As a picture




    >!







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Nice one! Just 1 short of the optimal number for the $geq 111$ version.
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, I'd give some more explanation and share my source code. But I haven't figured out how to maintain proper formatting while using the spoiler tag
      $endgroup$
      – Helena
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @ArnaudMortier maybe if we combine our approaches we can that number too
      $endgroup$
      – Helena
      4 hours ago













    3














    3










    3







    $begingroup$

    I got:




    16
    By having horizontal and vertical lines on a square grid in rows [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] and columns [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10]




    Counting:




    36 squares of size 1

    30 squares of size 2

    20 squares of size 3

    15 squares of size 4

    16 squares of size 5

    04 squares of size 6

    total: 111 squares




    As a picture




    >!







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    I got:




    16
    By having horizontal and vertical lines on a square grid in rows [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] and columns [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10]




    Counting:




    36 squares of size 1

    30 squares of size 2

    20 squares of size 3

    15 squares of size 4

    16 squares of size 5

    04 squares of size 6

    total: 111 squares




    As a picture




    >!








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 3 hours ago

























    answered 4 hours ago









    HelenaHelena

    8863 silver badges8 bronze badges




    8863 silver badges8 bronze badges














    • $begingroup$
      Nice one! Just 1 short of the optimal number for the $geq 111$ version.
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, I'd give some more explanation and share my source code. But I haven't figured out how to maintain proper formatting while using the spoiler tag
      $endgroup$
      – Helena
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @ArnaudMortier maybe if we combine our approaches we can that number too
      $endgroup$
      – Helena
      4 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      Nice one! Just 1 short of the optimal number for the $geq 111$ version.
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, I'd give some more explanation and share my source code. But I haven't figured out how to maintain proper formatting while using the spoiler tag
      $endgroup$
      – Helena
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @ArnaudMortier maybe if we combine our approaches we can that number too
      $endgroup$
      – Helena
      4 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    Nice one! Just 1 short of the optimal number for the $geq 111$ version.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Nice one! Just 1 short of the optimal number for the $geq 111$ version.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    4 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    Thanks, I'd give some more explanation and share my source code. But I haven't figured out how to maintain proper formatting while using the spoiler tag
    $endgroup$
    – Helena
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Thanks, I'd give some more explanation and share my source code. But I haven't figured out how to maintain proper formatting while using the spoiler tag
    $endgroup$
    – Helena
    4 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @ArnaudMortier maybe if we combine our approaches we can that number too
    $endgroup$
    – Helena
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @ArnaudMortier maybe if we combine our approaches we can that number too
    $endgroup$
    – Helena
    4 hours ago











    1














    $begingroup$

    I assume we have to draw exactly 111 squares.



    My answer:




    We have to draw a 1x111 grid, so the count is 111+2 = 114 lines. --> Changed my answer to 19 lines.




    How I find that:



     class Program

    static void Main(string[] args)

    Console.WriteLine("***********");
    printGrids(111);
    Console.WriteLine("***********");
    printGrids(112);
    Console.WriteLine("***********");


    Console.ReadLine();


    private static void printGrids(int target)

    Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Target: 0", target));
    for (int minDiff = 0; minDiff <= target; minDiff++)

    bool found = false;
    for (int x = 1; x <= target; x++)
    for (int y = x; y <= target; y++)

    int val = calc(x, y);
    int diff = Math.Abs(val - target);
    if (diff == minDiff)

    Console.WriteLine(string.Format("0x1: 2", x, y, val));
    found = true;


    if (found)
    break;


    private static int calc(int x, int y)

    int sum = 0;
    for (int val = 0; val < Math.Min(x, y); val++)
    sum += (x - val) * (y - val);
    return sum;





    Prints:



    ***********
    Target: 110
    1x110: 110
    2x37: 110
    3x19: 110
    4x12: 110
    ***********
    Target: 111
    1x111: 111
    ***********
    Target: 112
    1x112: 112
    6x7: 112
    ***********


    So if 112 is acceptable, using a 6x7 grid (15 lines) would be OK. But if we want exactly 111 squares, 1x111 grid (114 lines) is the only answer.



    Edit:
    4x12 (18 lines) - is the best answer for 110.
    We can add 1 more square to that with 1 line so the answer is 19 lines.



    (I cannot see this, I hope you can)
    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      @Arnaud Mortier the "calc" method is what I could formulate to calculate the problem. I've tried it on some cases that I could count and it seems working. And when we try all the cases, there is no solution for 111 except 1x111. This is what I could find, I may be wrong. If you find a mistake for the formulation, it is appreciated.
      $endgroup$
      – Koray
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I think that your "mistake" comes from the fact that all your lines are either horizontal or vertical, but that is not a requirement from the problem. It is only something you would do if you want to pass 111 as fast as you can, but not if you want to exactly reach it.
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      6 hours ago











    • $begingroup$
      @Arnaud Mortier yes, my solution only uses vertical and horizontal lines. I would love to see other than that, if there is.
      $endgroup$
      – Koray
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Arnaud Mortier my country does not allow i.stack.imgur.com so I cannot see your picture.. Opera VPN also not working.. I couldn't visualized your answer :(
      $endgroup$
      – Koray
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      That's too bad. I didn't choose the site, it's automatic in StackExchange sites.
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      6 hours ago















    1














    $begingroup$

    I assume we have to draw exactly 111 squares.



    My answer:




    We have to draw a 1x111 grid, so the count is 111+2 = 114 lines. --> Changed my answer to 19 lines.




    How I find that:



     class Program

    static void Main(string[] args)

    Console.WriteLine("***********");
    printGrids(111);
    Console.WriteLine("***********");
    printGrids(112);
    Console.WriteLine("***********");


    Console.ReadLine();


    private static void printGrids(int target)

    Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Target: 0", target));
    for (int minDiff = 0; minDiff <= target; minDiff++)

    bool found = false;
    for (int x = 1; x <= target; x++)
    for (int y = x; y <= target; y++)

    int val = calc(x, y);
    int diff = Math.Abs(val - target);
    if (diff == minDiff)

    Console.WriteLine(string.Format("0x1: 2", x, y, val));
    found = true;


    if (found)
    break;


    private static int calc(int x, int y)

    int sum = 0;
    for (int val = 0; val < Math.Min(x, y); val++)
    sum += (x - val) * (y - val);
    return sum;





    Prints:



    ***********
    Target: 110
    1x110: 110
    2x37: 110
    3x19: 110
    4x12: 110
    ***********
    Target: 111
    1x111: 111
    ***********
    Target: 112
    1x112: 112
    6x7: 112
    ***********


    So if 112 is acceptable, using a 6x7 grid (15 lines) would be OK. But if we want exactly 111 squares, 1x111 grid (114 lines) is the only answer.



    Edit:
    4x12 (18 lines) - is the best answer for 110.
    We can add 1 more square to that with 1 line so the answer is 19 lines.



    (I cannot see this, I hope you can)
    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      @Arnaud Mortier the "calc" method is what I could formulate to calculate the problem. I've tried it on some cases that I could count and it seems working. And when we try all the cases, there is no solution for 111 except 1x111. This is what I could find, I may be wrong. If you find a mistake for the formulation, it is appreciated.
      $endgroup$
      – Koray
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I think that your "mistake" comes from the fact that all your lines are either horizontal or vertical, but that is not a requirement from the problem. It is only something you would do if you want to pass 111 as fast as you can, but not if you want to exactly reach it.
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      6 hours ago











    • $begingroup$
      @Arnaud Mortier yes, my solution only uses vertical and horizontal lines. I would love to see other than that, if there is.
      $endgroup$
      – Koray
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Arnaud Mortier my country does not allow i.stack.imgur.com so I cannot see your picture.. Opera VPN also not working.. I couldn't visualized your answer :(
      $endgroup$
      – Koray
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      That's too bad. I didn't choose the site, it's automatic in StackExchange sites.
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      6 hours ago













    1














    1










    1







    $begingroup$

    I assume we have to draw exactly 111 squares.



    My answer:




    We have to draw a 1x111 grid, so the count is 111+2 = 114 lines. --> Changed my answer to 19 lines.




    How I find that:



     class Program

    static void Main(string[] args)

    Console.WriteLine("***********");
    printGrids(111);
    Console.WriteLine("***********");
    printGrids(112);
    Console.WriteLine("***********");


    Console.ReadLine();


    private static void printGrids(int target)

    Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Target: 0", target));
    for (int minDiff = 0; minDiff <= target; minDiff++)

    bool found = false;
    for (int x = 1; x <= target; x++)
    for (int y = x; y <= target; y++)

    int val = calc(x, y);
    int diff = Math.Abs(val - target);
    if (diff == minDiff)

    Console.WriteLine(string.Format("0x1: 2", x, y, val));
    found = true;


    if (found)
    break;


    private static int calc(int x, int y)

    int sum = 0;
    for (int val = 0; val < Math.Min(x, y); val++)
    sum += (x - val) * (y - val);
    return sum;





    Prints:



    ***********
    Target: 110
    1x110: 110
    2x37: 110
    3x19: 110
    4x12: 110
    ***********
    Target: 111
    1x111: 111
    ***********
    Target: 112
    1x112: 112
    6x7: 112
    ***********


    So if 112 is acceptable, using a 6x7 grid (15 lines) would be OK. But if we want exactly 111 squares, 1x111 grid (114 lines) is the only answer.



    Edit:
    4x12 (18 lines) - is the best answer for 110.
    We can add 1 more square to that with 1 line so the answer is 19 lines.



    (I cannot see this, I hope you can)
    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    I assume we have to draw exactly 111 squares.



    My answer:




    We have to draw a 1x111 grid, so the count is 111+2 = 114 lines. --> Changed my answer to 19 lines.




    How I find that:



     class Program

    static void Main(string[] args)

    Console.WriteLine("***********");
    printGrids(111);
    Console.WriteLine("***********");
    printGrids(112);
    Console.WriteLine("***********");


    Console.ReadLine();


    private static void printGrids(int target)

    Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Target: 0", target));
    for (int minDiff = 0; minDiff <= target; minDiff++)

    bool found = false;
    for (int x = 1; x <= target; x++)
    for (int y = x; y <= target; y++)

    int val = calc(x, y);
    int diff = Math.Abs(val - target);
    if (diff == minDiff)

    Console.WriteLine(string.Format("0x1: 2", x, y, val));
    found = true;


    if (found)
    break;


    private static int calc(int x, int y)

    int sum = 0;
    for (int val = 0; val < Math.Min(x, y); val++)
    sum += (x - val) * (y - val);
    return sum;





    Prints:



    ***********
    Target: 110
    1x110: 110
    2x37: 110
    3x19: 110
    4x12: 110
    ***********
    Target: 111
    1x111: 111
    ***********
    Target: 112
    1x112: 112
    6x7: 112
    ***********


    So if 112 is acceptable, using a 6x7 grid (15 lines) would be OK. But if we want exactly 111 squares, 1x111 grid (114 lines) is the only answer.



    Edit:
    4x12 (18 lines) - is the best answer for 110.
    We can add 1 more square to that with 1 line so the answer is 19 lines.



    (I cannot see this, I hope you can)
    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 6 hours ago

























    answered 6 hours ago









    KorayKoray

    1186 bronze badges




    1186 bronze badges














    • $begingroup$
      @Arnaud Mortier the "calc" method is what I could formulate to calculate the problem. I've tried it on some cases that I could count and it seems working. And when we try all the cases, there is no solution for 111 except 1x111. This is what I could find, I may be wrong. If you find a mistake for the formulation, it is appreciated.
      $endgroup$
      – Koray
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I think that your "mistake" comes from the fact that all your lines are either horizontal or vertical, but that is not a requirement from the problem. It is only something you would do if you want to pass 111 as fast as you can, but not if you want to exactly reach it.
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      6 hours ago











    • $begingroup$
      @Arnaud Mortier yes, my solution only uses vertical and horizontal lines. I would love to see other than that, if there is.
      $endgroup$
      – Koray
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Arnaud Mortier my country does not allow i.stack.imgur.com so I cannot see your picture.. Opera VPN also not working.. I couldn't visualized your answer :(
      $endgroup$
      – Koray
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      That's too bad. I didn't choose the site, it's automatic in StackExchange sites.
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      6 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      @Arnaud Mortier the "calc" method is what I could formulate to calculate the problem. I've tried it on some cases that I could count and it seems working. And when we try all the cases, there is no solution for 111 except 1x111. This is what I could find, I may be wrong. If you find a mistake for the formulation, it is appreciated.
      $endgroup$
      – Koray
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I think that your "mistake" comes from the fact that all your lines are either horizontal or vertical, but that is not a requirement from the problem. It is only something you would do if you want to pass 111 as fast as you can, but not if you want to exactly reach it.
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      6 hours ago











    • $begingroup$
      @Arnaud Mortier yes, my solution only uses vertical and horizontal lines. I would love to see other than that, if there is.
      $endgroup$
      – Koray
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Arnaud Mortier my country does not allow i.stack.imgur.com so I cannot see your picture.. Opera VPN also not working.. I couldn't visualized your answer :(
      $endgroup$
      – Koray
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      That's too bad. I didn't choose the site, it's automatic in StackExchange sites.
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      6 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    @Arnaud Mortier the "calc" method is what I could formulate to calculate the problem. I've tried it on some cases that I could count and it seems working. And when we try all the cases, there is no solution for 111 except 1x111. This is what I could find, I may be wrong. If you find a mistake for the formulation, it is appreciated.
    $endgroup$
    – Koray
    6 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Arnaud Mortier the "calc" method is what I could formulate to calculate the problem. I've tried it on some cases that I could count and it seems working. And when we try all the cases, there is no solution for 111 except 1x111. This is what I could find, I may be wrong. If you find a mistake for the formulation, it is appreciated.
    $endgroup$
    – Koray
    6 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    I think that your "mistake" comes from the fact that all your lines are either horizontal or vertical, but that is not a requirement from the problem. It is only something you would do if you want to pass 111 as fast as you can, but not if you want to exactly reach it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    6 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    I think that your "mistake" comes from the fact that all your lines are either horizontal or vertical, but that is not a requirement from the problem. It is only something you would do if you want to pass 111 as fast as you can, but not if you want to exactly reach it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    6 hours ago













    $begingroup$
    @Arnaud Mortier yes, my solution only uses vertical and horizontal lines. I would love to see other than that, if there is.
    $endgroup$
    – Koray
    6 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Arnaud Mortier yes, my solution only uses vertical and horizontal lines. I would love to see other than that, if there is.
    $endgroup$
    – Koray
    6 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @Arnaud Mortier my country does not allow i.stack.imgur.com so I cannot see your picture.. Opera VPN also not working.. I couldn't visualized your answer :(
    $endgroup$
    – Koray
    6 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Arnaud Mortier my country does not allow i.stack.imgur.com so I cannot see your picture.. Opera VPN also not working.. I couldn't visualized your answer :(
    $endgroup$
    – Koray
    6 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    That's too bad. I didn't choose the site, it's automatic in StackExchange sites.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    6 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    That's too bad. I didn't choose the site, it's automatic in StackExchange sites.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    6 hours ago











    -4














    $begingroup$

    The answer is:




    24


    For 110 squares I would draw a 10x11 grid, that requires 11+12=23 lines.

    Therefore I need 24 lines for the additional 111th square.







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



















      -4














      $begingroup$

      The answer is:




      24


      For 110 squares I would draw a 10x11 grid, that requires 11+12=23 lines.

      Therefore I need 24 lines for the additional 111th square.







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        -4














        -4










        -4







        $begingroup$

        The answer is:




        24


        For 110 squares I would draw a 10x11 grid, that requires 11+12=23 lines.

        Therefore I need 24 lines for the additional 111th square.







        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The answer is:




        24


        For 110 squares I would draw a 10x11 grid, that requires 11+12=23 lines.

        Therefore I need 24 lines for the additional 111th square.








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 9 hours ago









        npkllrnpkllr

        5612 silver badges8 bronze badges




        5612 silver badges8 bronze badges































            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f89178%2fminimum-number-of-lines-to-draw-111-squares%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її