Ubuntu show wrong disk sizes, how to solve it?Need to reboot twice when Ubuntu 12.04.1 mdadm RAID1 degradedThe volume boot has only 40mb disk space remainingDrive failure in Raid1. Can't replaceBreaking boot-up Raid 1 array into two independent drivesChanging disk space allocationIs it possible to add some disk space to ubuntu installed drive?if then what is the way?RAID disk size is less than display in SSA on HP Proliant DL380 Gen10Ubuntu 17.10 UEFI with raidMultiple Hard disks raid 1 adding space?Help figuring out what's taking up disk space

Find a text string in a file and output only the rest of the text that follows it?

split large formula in align

A verb for when some rights are not violated?

Is there a way to improve my grade after graduation?

Generate a random point outside a given rectangle within a map

Repeated! Factorials!

Can I enter a rental property without giving notice if I'm afraid a tenant may be hurt?

How to switch an 80286 from protected to real mode?

Is there a way to prevent the production team from messing up my paper?

Traveling from Germany to other countries by train?

Why do cheap flights with a layover get more expensive when you split them up into separate flights?

Did Captain America make out with his niece?

What filaments allow air to pass but not water vapor?

How easy is it to get a gun illegally in the United States?

I was contacted by a private bank overseas to get my inheritance

Write The Shortest Program To Check If A Binary Tree Is Balanced

Can attackers change the public key of certificate during the SSL handshake

Probably terminated or laid off soon; confront or not?

Definitional equality of two propositions about propositional equality

Why do proponents of guns oppose gun competency tests?

How to sort List<T> in c#

Nested Unlocked Packages requires Installation of Base Packages?

Can a Hogwarts student refuse the Sorting Hat's decision?

How many years before enough atoms of your body are replaced to survive the sudden disappearance of the original body’s atoms?



Ubuntu show wrong disk sizes, how to solve it?


Need to reboot twice when Ubuntu 12.04.1 mdadm RAID1 degradedThe volume boot has only 40mb disk space remainingDrive failure in Raid1. Can't replaceBreaking boot-up Raid 1 array into two independent drivesChanging disk space allocationIs it possible to add some disk space to ubuntu installed drive?if then what is the way?RAID disk size is less than display in SSA on HP Proliant DL380 Gen10Ubuntu 17.10 UEFI with raidMultiple Hard disks raid 1 adding space?Help figuring out what's taking up disk space






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















I have a server with these characteristics:



CPU: Intel Core i7-2600
PLUSRAID Controller 4-Port SATA PCI-E - Adaptec 5405

One each, SATA SSD, 240 GB

Two each, SATA HDDs, 3.0 TB Enterprise

Two each, 8 GB DDR3 RAM



I installed Ubuntu on it, but it shows the space such as this, far less than the true capacity:




root@ns1 /boot # lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sdb 8:16 1 238.4G 0 disk
├─sdb2 8:18 1 512M 0 part
│ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
├─sdb3 8:19 1 229.9G 0 part
│ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
└─sdb1 8:17 1 8G 0 part
└─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]
sda 8:0 1 2.7T 0 disk
├─sda2 8:2 1 512M 0 part
│ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
├─sda3 8:3 1 229.9G 0 part
│ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
└─sda1 8:1 1 8G 0 part
└─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]


and




root@ns1 /boot # df -lh
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
udev 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev
tmpfs 1.6G 5.3M 1.6G 1% /run
/dev/md2 226G 17G 198G 8% /
tmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock
tmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/md1 488M 176M 287M 38% /boot
tmpfs 1.6G 0 1.6G 0% /run/user/0



I don't seem to be using all the space available on the sda disk at all, the two 3 terabytes disks.



What am I doing wrong?



Thanks!










share|improve this question









New contributor



Lex Thoonen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    What is wrong ?

    – Soren A
    10 hours ago











  • Thanks Soren, you've pointed something out I hadn't even noticed. So the 3TB disk(s) are there in lsblk but the total capacity I'm allowed to use like this is far less than 3TB.

    – Lex Thoonen
    10 hours ago







  • 2





    One problem I see here. You did a RAID 1 (mirrored) on a 3TB drive and a 240GB drive. The problem is that the Mirrored RAID will only be at the size of the SMALLEST drive so you will only get 240GB out of 3TB. Destroy your RAID and do them as separate drives but you will lose data so backup first.

    – Terrance
    9 hours ago


















4















I have a server with these characteristics:



CPU: Intel Core i7-2600
PLUSRAID Controller 4-Port SATA PCI-E - Adaptec 5405

One each, SATA SSD, 240 GB

Two each, SATA HDDs, 3.0 TB Enterprise

Two each, 8 GB DDR3 RAM



I installed Ubuntu on it, but it shows the space such as this, far less than the true capacity:




root@ns1 /boot # lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sdb 8:16 1 238.4G 0 disk
├─sdb2 8:18 1 512M 0 part
│ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
├─sdb3 8:19 1 229.9G 0 part
│ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
└─sdb1 8:17 1 8G 0 part
└─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]
sda 8:0 1 2.7T 0 disk
├─sda2 8:2 1 512M 0 part
│ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
├─sda3 8:3 1 229.9G 0 part
│ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
└─sda1 8:1 1 8G 0 part
└─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]


and




root@ns1 /boot # df -lh
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
udev 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev
tmpfs 1.6G 5.3M 1.6G 1% /run
/dev/md2 226G 17G 198G 8% /
tmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock
tmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/md1 488M 176M 287M 38% /boot
tmpfs 1.6G 0 1.6G 0% /run/user/0



I don't seem to be using all the space available on the sda disk at all, the two 3 terabytes disks.



What am I doing wrong?



Thanks!










share|improve this question









New contributor



Lex Thoonen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    What is wrong ?

    – Soren A
    10 hours ago











  • Thanks Soren, you've pointed something out I hadn't even noticed. So the 3TB disk(s) are there in lsblk but the total capacity I'm allowed to use like this is far less than 3TB.

    – Lex Thoonen
    10 hours ago







  • 2





    One problem I see here. You did a RAID 1 (mirrored) on a 3TB drive and a 240GB drive. The problem is that the Mirrored RAID will only be at the size of the SMALLEST drive so you will only get 240GB out of 3TB. Destroy your RAID and do them as separate drives but you will lose data so backup first.

    – Terrance
    9 hours ago














4












4








4








I have a server with these characteristics:



CPU: Intel Core i7-2600
PLUSRAID Controller 4-Port SATA PCI-E - Adaptec 5405

One each, SATA SSD, 240 GB

Two each, SATA HDDs, 3.0 TB Enterprise

Two each, 8 GB DDR3 RAM



I installed Ubuntu on it, but it shows the space such as this, far less than the true capacity:




root@ns1 /boot # lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sdb 8:16 1 238.4G 0 disk
├─sdb2 8:18 1 512M 0 part
│ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
├─sdb3 8:19 1 229.9G 0 part
│ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
└─sdb1 8:17 1 8G 0 part
└─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]
sda 8:0 1 2.7T 0 disk
├─sda2 8:2 1 512M 0 part
│ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
├─sda3 8:3 1 229.9G 0 part
│ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
└─sda1 8:1 1 8G 0 part
└─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]


and




root@ns1 /boot # df -lh
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
udev 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev
tmpfs 1.6G 5.3M 1.6G 1% /run
/dev/md2 226G 17G 198G 8% /
tmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock
tmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/md1 488M 176M 287M 38% /boot
tmpfs 1.6G 0 1.6G 0% /run/user/0



I don't seem to be using all the space available on the sda disk at all, the two 3 terabytes disks.



What am I doing wrong?



Thanks!










share|improve this question









New contributor



Lex Thoonen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I have a server with these characteristics:



CPU: Intel Core i7-2600
PLUSRAID Controller 4-Port SATA PCI-E - Adaptec 5405

One each, SATA SSD, 240 GB

Two each, SATA HDDs, 3.0 TB Enterprise

Two each, 8 GB DDR3 RAM



I installed Ubuntu on it, but it shows the space such as this, far less than the true capacity:




root@ns1 /boot # lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sdb 8:16 1 238.4G 0 disk
├─sdb2 8:18 1 512M 0 part
│ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
├─sdb3 8:19 1 229.9G 0 part
│ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
└─sdb1 8:17 1 8G 0 part
└─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]
sda 8:0 1 2.7T 0 disk
├─sda2 8:2 1 512M 0 part
│ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
├─sda3 8:3 1 229.9G 0 part
│ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
└─sda1 8:1 1 8G 0 part
└─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]


and




root@ns1 /boot # df -lh
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
udev 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev
tmpfs 1.6G 5.3M 1.6G 1% /run
/dev/md2 226G 17G 198G 8% /
tmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock
tmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/md1 488M 176M 287M 38% /boot
tmpfs 1.6G 0 1.6G 0% /run/user/0



I don't seem to be using all the space available on the sda disk at all, the two 3 terabytes disks.



What am I doing wrong?



Thanks!







partitioning hard-drive raid






share|improve this question









New contributor



Lex Thoonen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Lex Thoonen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago









K7AAY

4,4373 gold badges18 silver badges45 bronze badges




4,4373 gold badges18 silver badges45 bronze badges






New contributor



Lex Thoonen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 10 hours ago









Lex ThoonenLex Thoonen

212 bronze badges




212 bronze badges




New contributor



Lex Thoonen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Lex Thoonen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • 1





    What is wrong ?

    – Soren A
    10 hours ago











  • Thanks Soren, you've pointed something out I hadn't even noticed. So the 3TB disk(s) are there in lsblk but the total capacity I'm allowed to use like this is far less than 3TB.

    – Lex Thoonen
    10 hours ago







  • 2





    One problem I see here. You did a RAID 1 (mirrored) on a 3TB drive and a 240GB drive. The problem is that the Mirrored RAID will only be at the size of the SMALLEST drive so you will only get 240GB out of 3TB. Destroy your RAID and do them as separate drives but you will lose data so backup first.

    – Terrance
    9 hours ago













  • 1





    What is wrong ?

    – Soren A
    10 hours ago











  • Thanks Soren, you've pointed something out I hadn't even noticed. So the 3TB disk(s) are there in lsblk but the total capacity I'm allowed to use like this is far less than 3TB.

    – Lex Thoonen
    10 hours ago







  • 2





    One problem I see here. You did a RAID 1 (mirrored) on a 3TB drive and a 240GB drive. The problem is that the Mirrored RAID will only be at the size of the SMALLEST drive so you will only get 240GB out of 3TB. Destroy your RAID and do them as separate drives but you will lose data so backup first.

    – Terrance
    9 hours ago








1




1





What is wrong ?

– Soren A
10 hours ago





What is wrong ?

– Soren A
10 hours ago













Thanks Soren, you've pointed something out I hadn't even noticed. So the 3TB disk(s) are there in lsblk but the total capacity I'm allowed to use like this is far less than 3TB.

– Lex Thoonen
10 hours ago






Thanks Soren, you've pointed something out I hadn't even noticed. So the 3TB disk(s) are there in lsblk but the total capacity I'm allowed to use like this is far less than 3TB.

– Lex Thoonen
10 hours ago





2




2





One problem I see here. You did a RAID 1 (mirrored) on a 3TB drive and a 240GB drive. The problem is that the Mirrored RAID will only be at the size of the SMALLEST drive so you will only get 240GB out of 3TB. Destroy your RAID and do them as separate drives but you will lose data so backup first.

– Terrance
9 hours ago






One problem I see here. You did a RAID 1 (mirrored) on a 3TB drive and a 240GB drive. The problem is that the Mirrored RAID will only be at the size of the SMALLEST drive so you will only get 240GB out of 3TB. Destroy your RAID and do them as separate drives but you will lose data so backup first.

– Terrance
9 hours ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














It looks like that you have made raid1 (mirror) between partitions on your SSD and HDD. This is not best practice, since it more or less restricts performance to that of the slowest disk.



You can see that /boot, / and [ SWAP ] is defined on partitions on both /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.



sdb 8:16 1 238.4G 0 disk
├─sdb2 8:18 1 512M 0 part
│ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
├─sdb3 8:19 1 229.9G 0 part
│ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
└─sdb1 8:17 1 8G 0 part
└─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]
sda 8:0 1 2.7T 0 disk
├─sda2 8:2 1 512M 0 part
│ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
├─sda3 8:3 1 229.9G 0 part
│ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
└─sda1 8:1 1 8G 0 part
└─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]


I would recommend that you reinstall Ubuntu using only SSD for /boot, / and SWAP. If yopu really want a raid1/mirror setup, you should buy one more 240 GB SSD, so you mirror between similar type and size disks.



Anyway .. if you take a look at your disks with gparted (or fdisk -l) you should see a huge unallocated amount of data on /dev/sda.






share|improve this answer
































    3














    The reason why your "3,0 TB" drive (sda) shows up as 2.7T is most likely due to different units being used.



    The size is probably about 2.7 Tebibyte, which is approximately the same as 3.0 TB.



    You can read about it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tebibyte






    share|improve this answer

























    • Thank you, but still, it seems like this I only have access to 230 GB, it would be nice if I could use the 2.7 TB

      – Lex Thoonen
      10 hours ago






    • 1





      @LexThoonen You do have access to 240GB. Run dmesg | grep blocks in a terminal and you will see something like [ 3.989812] sd 4:0:0:0: [sde] 468862128 512-byte logical blocks: (240 GB/224 GiB) which shows that you are seeing the GiB of the drive and not the GB. The 3TB drive shows up like [ 3.462108] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566645 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.73 TiB)

      – Terrance
      9 hours ago



















    2














    lsblk shows all disk partitions, while df -lh only shows your mounted partitions.






    share|improve this answer






















    • 1





      Don't do that .. sda2 seems to be a part of a raid1 (mirror) ...

      – Soren A
      9 hours ago











    • You are right. I removed the example.

      – user3140225
      9 hours ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "89"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Lex Thoonen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1163809%2fubuntu-show-wrong-disk-sizes-how-to-solve-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    It looks like that you have made raid1 (mirror) between partitions on your SSD and HDD. This is not best practice, since it more or less restricts performance to that of the slowest disk.



    You can see that /boot, / and [ SWAP ] is defined on partitions on both /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.



    sdb 8:16 1 238.4G 0 disk
    ├─sdb2 8:18 1 512M 0 part
    │ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
    ├─sdb3 8:19 1 229.9G 0 part
    │ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
    └─sdb1 8:17 1 8G 0 part
    └─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]
    sda 8:0 1 2.7T 0 disk
    ├─sda2 8:2 1 512M 0 part
    │ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
    ├─sda3 8:3 1 229.9G 0 part
    │ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
    └─sda1 8:1 1 8G 0 part
    └─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]


    I would recommend that you reinstall Ubuntu using only SSD for /boot, / and SWAP. If yopu really want a raid1/mirror setup, you should buy one more 240 GB SSD, so you mirror between similar type and size disks.



    Anyway .. if you take a look at your disks with gparted (or fdisk -l) you should see a huge unallocated amount of data on /dev/sda.






    share|improve this answer





























      4














      It looks like that you have made raid1 (mirror) between partitions on your SSD and HDD. This is not best practice, since it more or less restricts performance to that of the slowest disk.



      You can see that /boot, / and [ SWAP ] is defined on partitions on both /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.



      sdb 8:16 1 238.4G 0 disk
      ├─sdb2 8:18 1 512M 0 part
      │ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
      ├─sdb3 8:19 1 229.9G 0 part
      │ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
      └─sdb1 8:17 1 8G 0 part
      └─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]
      sda 8:0 1 2.7T 0 disk
      ├─sda2 8:2 1 512M 0 part
      │ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
      ├─sda3 8:3 1 229.9G 0 part
      │ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
      └─sda1 8:1 1 8G 0 part
      └─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]


      I would recommend that you reinstall Ubuntu using only SSD for /boot, / and SWAP. If yopu really want a raid1/mirror setup, you should buy one more 240 GB SSD, so you mirror between similar type and size disks.



      Anyway .. if you take a look at your disks with gparted (or fdisk -l) you should see a huge unallocated amount of data on /dev/sda.






      share|improve this answer



























        4












        4








        4







        It looks like that you have made raid1 (mirror) between partitions on your SSD and HDD. This is not best practice, since it more or less restricts performance to that of the slowest disk.



        You can see that /boot, / and [ SWAP ] is defined on partitions on both /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.



        sdb 8:16 1 238.4G 0 disk
        ├─sdb2 8:18 1 512M 0 part
        │ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
        ├─sdb3 8:19 1 229.9G 0 part
        │ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
        └─sdb1 8:17 1 8G 0 part
        └─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]
        sda 8:0 1 2.7T 0 disk
        ├─sda2 8:2 1 512M 0 part
        │ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
        ├─sda3 8:3 1 229.9G 0 part
        │ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
        └─sda1 8:1 1 8G 0 part
        └─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]


        I would recommend that you reinstall Ubuntu using only SSD for /boot, / and SWAP. If yopu really want a raid1/mirror setup, you should buy one more 240 GB SSD, so you mirror between similar type and size disks.



        Anyway .. if you take a look at your disks with gparted (or fdisk -l) you should see a huge unallocated amount of data on /dev/sda.






        share|improve this answer













        It looks like that you have made raid1 (mirror) between partitions on your SSD and HDD. This is not best practice, since it more or less restricts performance to that of the slowest disk.



        You can see that /boot, / and [ SWAP ] is defined on partitions on both /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.



        sdb 8:16 1 238.4G 0 disk
        ├─sdb2 8:18 1 512M 0 part
        │ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
        ├─sdb3 8:19 1 229.9G 0 part
        │ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
        └─sdb1 8:17 1 8G 0 part
        └─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]
        sda 8:0 1 2.7T 0 disk
        ├─sda2 8:2 1 512M 0 part
        │ └─md1 9:1 0 511.4M 0 raid1 /boot
        ├─sda3 8:3 1 229.9G 0 part
        │ └─md2 9:2 0 229.8G 0 raid1 /
        └─sda1 8:1 1 8G 0 part
        └─md0 9:0 0 8G 0 raid1 [SWAP]


        I would recommend that you reinstall Ubuntu using only SSD for /boot, / and SWAP. If yopu really want a raid1/mirror setup, you should buy one more 240 GB SSD, so you mirror between similar type and size disks.



        Anyway .. if you take a look at your disks with gparted (or fdisk -l) you should see a huge unallocated amount of data on /dev/sda.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 9 hours ago









        Soren ASoren A

        3,8091 gold badge11 silver badges26 bronze badges




        3,8091 gold badge11 silver badges26 bronze badges


























            3














            The reason why your "3,0 TB" drive (sda) shows up as 2.7T is most likely due to different units being used.



            The size is probably about 2.7 Tebibyte, which is approximately the same as 3.0 TB.



            You can read about it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tebibyte






            share|improve this answer

























            • Thank you, but still, it seems like this I only have access to 230 GB, it would be nice if I could use the 2.7 TB

              – Lex Thoonen
              10 hours ago






            • 1





              @LexThoonen You do have access to 240GB. Run dmesg | grep blocks in a terminal and you will see something like [ 3.989812] sd 4:0:0:0: [sde] 468862128 512-byte logical blocks: (240 GB/224 GiB) which shows that you are seeing the GiB of the drive and not the GB. The 3TB drive shows up like [ 3.462108] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566645 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.73 TiB)

              – Terrance
              9 hours ago
















            3














            The reason why your "3,0 TB" drive (sda) shows up as 2.7T is most likely due to different units being used.



            The size is probably about 2.7 Tebibyte, which is approximately the same as 3.0 TB.



            You can read about it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tebibyte






            share|improve this answer

























            • Thank you, but still, it seems like this I only have access to 230 GB, it would be nice if I could use the 2.7 TB

              – Lex Thoonen
              10 hours ago






            • 1





              @LexThoonen You do have access to 240GB. Run dmesg | grep blocks in a terminal and you will see something like [ 3.989812] sd 4:0:0:0: [sde] 468862128 512-byte logical blocks: (240 GB/224 GiB) which shows that you are seeing the GiB of the drive and not the GB. The 3TB drive shows up like [ 3.462108] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566645 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.73 TiB)

              – Terrance
              9 hours ago














            3












            3








            3







            The reason why your "3,0 TB" drive (sda) shows up as 2.7T is most likely due to different units being used.



            The size is probably about 2.7 Tebibyte, which is approximately the same as 3.0 TB.



            You can read about it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tebibyte






            share|improve this answer













            The reason why your "3,0 TB" drive (sda) shows up as 2.7T is most likely due to different units being used.



            The size is probably about 2.7 Tebibyte, which is approximately the same as 3.0 TB.



            You can read about it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tebibyte







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 10 hours ago









            EliasElias

            3861 silver badge12 bronze badges




            3861 silver badge12 bronze badges















            • Thank you, but still, it seems like this I only have access to 230 GB, it would be nice if I could use the 2.7 TB

              – Lex Thoonen
              10 hours ago






            • 1





              @LexThoonen You do have access to 240GB. Run dmesg | grep blocks in a terminal and you will see something like [ 3.989812] sd 4:0:0:0: [sde] 468862128 512-byte logical blocks: (240 GB/224 GiB) which shows that you are seeing the GiB of the drive and not the GB. The 3TB drive shows up like [ 3.462108] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566645 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.73 TiB)

              – Terrance
              9 hours ago


















            • Thank you, but still, it seems like this I only have access to 230 GB, it would be nice if I could use the 2.7 TB

              – Lex Thoonen
              10 hours ago






            • 1





              @LexThoonen You do have access to 240GB. Run dmesg | grep blocks in a terminal and you will see something like [ 3.989812] sd 4:0:0:0: [sde] 468862128 512-byte logical blocks: (240 GB/224 GiB) which shows that you are seeing the GiB of the drive and not the GB. The 3TB drive shows up like [ 3.462108] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566645 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.73 TiB)

              – Terrance
              9 hours ago

















            Thank you, but still, it seems like this I only have access to 230 GB, it would be nice if I could use the 2.7 TB

            – Lex Thoonen
            10 hours ago





            Thank you, but still, it seems like this I only have access to 230 GB, it would be nice if I could use the 2.7 TB

            – Lex Thoonen
            10 hours ago




            1




            1





            @LexThoonen You do have access to 240GB. Run dmesg | grep blocks in a terminal and you will see something like [ 3.989812] sd 4:0:0:0: [sde] 468862128 512-byte logical blocks: (240 GB/224 GiB) which shows that you are seeing the GiB of the drive and not the GB. The 3TB drive shows up like [ 3.462108] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566645 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.73 TiB)

            – Terrance
            9 hours ago






            @LexThoonen You do have access to 240GB. Run dmesg | grep blocks in a terminal and you will see something like [ 3.989812] sd 4:0:0:0: [sde] 468862128 512-byte logical blocks: (240 GB/224 GiB) which shows that you are seeing the GiB of the drive and not the GB. The 3TB drive shows up like [ 3.462108] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566645 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.73 TiB)

            – Terrance
            9 hours ago












            2














            lsblk shows all disk partitions, while df -lh only shows your mounted partitions.






            share|improve this answer






















            • 1





              Don't do that .. sda2 seems to be a part of a raid1 (mirror) ...

              – Soren A
              9 hours ago











            • You are right. I removed the example.

              – user3140225
              9 hours ago















            2














            lsblk shows all disk partitions, while df -lh only shows your mounted partitions.






            share|improve this answer






















            • 1





              Don't do that .. sda2 seems to be a part of a raid1 (mirror) ...

              – Soren A
              9 hours ago











            • You are right. I removed the example.

              – user3140225
              9 hours ago













            2












            2








            2







            lsblk shows all disk partitions, while df -lh only shows your mounted partitions.






            share|improve this answer















            lsblk shows all disk partitions, while df -lh only shows your mounted partitions.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 9 hours ago

























            answered 10 hours ago









            user3140225user3140225

            6863 silver badges17 bronze badges




            6863 silver badges17 bronze badges










            • 1





              Don't do that .. sda2 seems to be a part of a raid1 (mirror) ...

              – Soren A
              9 hours ago











            • You are right. I removed the example.

              – user3140225
              9 hours ago












            • 1





              Don't do that .. sda2 seems to be a part of a raid1 (mirror) ...

              – Soren A
              9 hours ago











            • You are right. I removed the example.

              – user3140225
              9 hours ago







            1




            1





            Don't do that .. sda2 seems to be a part of a raid1 (mirror) ...

            – Soren A
            9 hours ago





            Don't do that .. sda2 seems to be a part of a raid1 (mirror) ...

            – Soren A
            9 hours ago













            You are right. I removed the example.

            – user3140225
            9 hours ago





            You are right. I removed the example.

            – user3140225
            9 hours ago










            Lex Thoonen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Lex Thoonen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Lex Thoonen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Lex Thoonen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1163809%2fubuntu-show-wrong-disk-sizes-how-to-solve-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480