Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address?How big is the UTXO database?UTXO all sent to change address?Editing the utxo database?get the location of UTXO datautxo vs account-modelHow can I get UTXO for a specific address?Zcash T-address address wise UTXO transaction list both testnet and mainnet APII seem to have too many unspent outputs for my given balance. What am I missing?Uneconomical UTXO requestedBitcoin address generation and UTXO scanning

Getting an entry level IT position later in life

Minimum effort to detect a solved Rubik's Cube

Probably terminated or laid off soon; confront or not?

Did Apollo leave poop on the moon?

Changing Row Keys into Normal Rows

Examples of application problems of coordinate geometry in the complex plane?

Based on what criteria do you add/not add icons to labels within a toolbar?

Why can I log in to my facebook account with misspelled email/password

How to touch up scratches on a black anodized aluminum flashlight?

Pronouns when writing from the point of view of a robot

Does the length of a password for Wi-Fi affect speed?

Where to pee in London?

Repeated! Factorials!

Identify Batman without getting caught

Our group keeps dying during the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign. What are we doing wrong?

Non-small objects in categories

Ancients don't give a full level?

Only charge capacitor when button pushed then turn on LED momentarily with capacitor when button released

Why private jets such as GulfStream ones fly higher than other civil jets?

Best way to explain to my boss that I cannot attend a team summit because it is on Rosh Hashana or any other Jewish Holiday

Does this smartphone photo show Mars just below the Sun?

Find only those folders that contain a File with the same name as the Folder

How to realistically deal with a shield user?

Is a switch from R to Python worth it?



Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address?


How big is the UTXO database?UTXO all sent to change address?Editing the utxo database?get the location of UTXO datautxo vs account-modelHow can I get UTXO for a specific address?Zcash T-address address wise UTXO transaction list both testnet and mainnet APII seem to have too many unspent outputs for my given balance. What am I missing?Uneconomical UTXO requestedBitcoin address generation and UTXO scanning






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.



Or am I missing something completely?



I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?



Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?



Thank-you!










share|improve this question







New contributor



wild_nothing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



























    1















    Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.



    Or am I missing something completely?



    I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?



    Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?



    Thank-you!










    share|improve this question







    New contributor



    wild_nothing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      1












      1








      1








      Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.



      Or am I missing something completely?



      I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?



      Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?



      Thank-you!










      share|improve this question







      New contributor



      wild_nothing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.



      Or am I missing something completely?



      I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?



      Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?



      Thank-you!







      utxo






      share|improve this question







      New contributor



      wild_nothing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share|improve this question







      New contributor



      wild_nothing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor



      wild_nothing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      asked 8 hours ago









      wild_nothingwild_nothing

      1083 bronze badges




      1083 bronze badges




      New contributor



      wild_nothing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




      New contributor




      wild_nothing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3















          Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.




          Not really. A UTXO is more like a particular bill or coin in that it's a specific "chunk" of value.



          The reason UTXO is a concept is because bitcoin is designed as a set of UTXOs rather than as a balance. It's the same way cash is designed as a set of bills and coins rather than a balance. When you say, "I have $100.43 in cash", you mean that you have some set of bills and coins whose value totals to that amount. This is analogous to a set of UTXOs in bitcoin.




          Or am I missing something completely?




          I think what you're missing is that bitcoin was not designed to have accounts with balances as the primary implementation but to instead have a set of unspent outputs.




          I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?




          The blockchain doesn't care about addresses. If you have two UTXOs that you have the correct key(s) to claim, you can form a transaction that claims those two UTXOs and creates some new UTXOs as its output.




          Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?




          A "current address balance" is the total value of all the UTXOs a particular key can claim.






          share|improve this answer

























          • So what you're saying is that a (non HD) private key can have one address and multiple UTXOs which total the balance on that address?

            – wild_nothing
            8 hours ago







          • 3





            If you total the UTXOs, you get a number that you can think of as the balance on that address. But the blockchain itself doesn't give that number any particular meaning -- it's just UTXOs.

            – David Schwartz
            8 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "308"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          wild_nothing is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbitcoin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f89620%2fis-utxo-synonymous-with-leftover-money-in-an-address%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3















          Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.




          Not really. A UTXO is more like a particular bill or coin in that it's a specific "chunk" of value.



          The reason UTXO is a concept is because bitcoin is designed as a set of UTXOs rather than as a balance. It's the same way cash is designed as a set of bills and coins rather than a balance. When you say, "I have $100.43 in cash", you mean that you have some set of bills and coins whose value totals to that amount. This is analogous to a set of UTXOs in bitcoin.




          Or am I missing something completely?




          I think what you're missing is that bitcoin was not designed to have accounts with balances as the primary implementation but to instead have a set of unspent outputs.




          I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?




          The blockchain doesn't care about addresses. If you have two UTXOs that you have the correct key(s) to claim, you can form a transaction that claims those two UTXOs and creates some new UTXOs as its output.




          Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?




          A "current address balance" is the total value of all the UTXOs a particular key can claim.






          share|improve this answer

























          • So what you're saying is that a (non HD) private key can have one address and multiple UTXOs which total the balance on that address?

            – wild_nothing
            8 hours ago







          • 3





            If you total the UTXOs, you get a number that you can think of as the balance on that address. But the blockchain itself doesn't give that number any particular meaning -- it's just UTXOs.

            – David Schwartz
            8 hours ago















          3















          Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.




          Not really. A UTXO is more like a particular bill or coin in that it's a specific "chunk" of value.



          The reason UTXO is a concept is because bitcoin is designed as a set of UTXOs rather than as a balance. It's the same way cash is designed as a set of bills and coins rather than a balance. When you say, "I have $100.43 in cash", you mean that you have some set of bills and coins whose value totals to that amount. This is analogous to a set of UTXOs in bitcoin.




          Or am I missing something completely?




          I think what you're missing is that bitcoin was not designed to have accounts with balances as the primary implementation but to instead have a set of unspent outputs.




          I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?




          The blockchain doesn't care about addresses. If you have two UTXOs that you have the correct key(s) to claim, you can form a transaction that claims those two UTXOs and creates some new UTXOs as its output.




          Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?




          A "current address balance" is the total value of all the UTXOs a particular key can claim.






          share|improve this answer

























          • So what you're saying is that a (non HD) private key can have one address and multiple UTXOs which total the balance on that address?

            – wild_nothing
            8 hours ago







          • 3





            If you total the UTXOs, you get a number that you can think of as the balance on that address. But the blockchain itself doesn't give that number any particular meaning -- it's just UTXOs.

            – David Schwartz
            8 hours ago













          3












          3








          3








          Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.




          Not really. A UTXO is more like a particular bill or coin in that it's a specific "chunk" of value.



          The reason UTXO is a concept is because bitcoin is designed as a set of UTXOs rather than as a balance. It's the same way cash is designed as a set of bills and coins rather than a balance. When you say, "I have $100.43 in cash", you mean that you have some set of bills and coins whose value totals to that amount. This is analogous to a set of UTXOs in bitcoin.




          Or am I missing something completely?




          I think what you're missing is that bitcoin was not designed to have accounts with balances as the primary implementation but to instead have a set of unspent outputs.




          I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?




          The blockchain doesn't care about addresses. If you have two UTXOs that you have the correct key(s) to claim, you can form a transaction that claims those two UTXOs and creates some new UTXOs as its output.




          Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?




          A "current address balance" is the total value of all the UTXOs a particular key can claim.






          share|improve this answer














          Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.




          Not really. A UTXO is more like a particular bill or coin in that it's a specific "chunk" of value.



          The reason UTXO is a concept is because bitcoin is designed as a set of UTXOs rather than as a balance. It's the same way cash is designed as a set of bills and coins rather than a balance. When you say, "I have $100.43 in cash", you mean that you have some set of bills and coins whose value totals to that amount. This is analogous to a set of UTXOs in bitcoin.




          Or am I missing something completely?




          I think what you're missing is that bitcoin was not designed to have accounts with balances as the primary implementation but to instead have a set of unspent outputs.




          I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?




          The blockchain doesn't care about addresses. If you have two UTXOs that you have the correct key(s) to claim, you can form a transaction that claims those two UTXOs and creates some new UTXOs as its output.




          Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?




          A "current address balance" is the total value of all the UTXOs a particular key can claim.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          David SchwartzDavid Schwartz

          46.1k5 gold badges95 silver badges165 bronze badges




          46.1k5 gold badges95 silver badges165 bronze badges















          • So what you're saying is that a (non HD) private key can have one address and multiple UTXOs which total the balance on that address?

            – wild_nothing
            8 hours ago







          • 3





            If you total the UTXOs, you get a number that you can think of as the balance on that address. But the blockchain itself doesn't give that number any particular meaning -- it's just UTXOs.

            – David Schwartz
            8 hours ago

















          • So what you're saying is that a (non HD) private key can have one address and multiple UTXOs which total the balance on that address?

            – wild_nothing
            8 hours ago







          • 3





            If you total the UTXOs, you get a number that you can think of as the balance on that address. But the blockchain itself doesn't give that number any particular meaning -- it's just UTXOs.

            – David Schwartz
            8 hours ago
















          So what you're saying is that a (non HD) private key can have one address and multiple UTXOs which total the balance on that address?

          – wild_nothing
          8 hours ago






          So what you're saying is that a (non HD) private key can have one address and multiple UTXOs which total the balance on that address?

          – wild_nothing
          8 hours ago





          3




          3





          If you total the UTXOs, you get a number that you can think of as the balance on that address. But the blockchain itself doesn't give that number any particular meaning -- it's just UTXOs.

          – David Schwartz
          8 hours ago





          If you total the UTXOs, you get a number that you can think of as the balance on that address. But the blockchain itself doesn't give that number any particular meaning -- it's just UTXOs.

          – David Schwartz
          8 hours ago










          wild_nothing is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          wild_nothing is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          wild_nothing is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          wild_nothing is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Bitcoin Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbitcoin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f89620%2fis-utxo-synonymous-with-leftover-money-in-an-address%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її