Is “safes” an acceptable alternative to “makes safe”Will this kind of entanglement of tenses be acceptable?Using “should” makes a sentence sound feminine?Is the practice of calling others by initials acceptable?Is “Be More Intentional” Acceptable Usage?Is “text” an acceptable past tense?Confusion about “on behalf of”Positive alternative of Clique?is accepted or is acceptable?An alternative to “Recent” and How recent is recentGrammar: “I'll try AND help them”

What is an air conditioner compressor hard start kit and how does it work?

Is "safes" an acceptable alternative to "makes safe"

Make a living as a math programming freelancer?

Can you take actions after being healed at 0hp?

Minimum effort to detect a solved Rubik's Cube

Why does capacitance not depend on the material of the plates?

Should I take out a personal loan to pay off credit card debt?

Purchased new computer from DELL with pre-installed Ubuntu. Won't boot. Should assume its an error from DELL?

Why did the US Airways Flight 1549 passengers stay on the wings?

Only charge capacitor when button pushed then turn on LED momentarily with capacitor when button released

What is it exactly about flying a Flyboard across the English channel that made Zapata's thighs burn?

Tile the chessboard with four-colored triominoes

How do I get the =LEFT function in excel, to also take the number zero as the first number?

How to approach protecting my code as a research assistant? Should I be worried in the first place?

Pronouns when writing from the point of view of a robot

Ancients don't give a full level?

Non-small objects in categories

Generate a random point outside a given rectangle within a map

Why do dragons like shiny stuff?

Why am I not getting stuck in the loop

Find a text string in a file and output only the rest of the text that follows it?

Can attackers change the public key of certificate during the SSL handshake

Ubuntu show wrong disk sizes, how to solve it?

In MTG, was there ever a five-color deck that worked well?



Is “safes” an acceptable alternative to “makes safe”


Will this kind of entanglement of tenses be acceptable?Using “should” makes a sentence sound feminine?Is the practice of calling others by initials acceptable?Is “Be More Intentional” Acceptable Usage?Is “text” an acceptable past tense?Confusion about “on behalf of”Positive alternative of Clique?is accepted or is acceptable?An alternative to “Recent” and How recent is recentGrammar: “I'll try AND help them”






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















Though I know it's uncommon usage (and intentionally so). Is the follow sentence legitimate?




She safes the dangerous area so it cannot be stumbled upon.




Obviously, modern usage would be "she makes safe", but some research on my part shows that "safes" is an acceptable "third-person singular simple present" form of safe.



Am I correct?










share|improve this question





















  • 6





    I'm guessing you'll spend more time explaining that you didn't mean "saves" than you gain by replacing "makes safe"

    – user888379
    8 hours ago






  • 5





    You could use 'safeguards' or 'secures' if you just want one word.

    – S Conroy
    8 hours ago











  • Can you give example sentences (author/date/links if possible) from your research?

    – Mitch
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    Wouldn't "secures" do much the same job?

    – WS2
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    Why bother with archaisms in industrial contexts? Also, you do not mean stumbled upon, which means to come upon by chance. You mean: so no one falls over junk (objects) on the floor.

    – Lambie
    6 hours ago

















3















Though I know it's uncommon usage (and intentionally so). Is the follow sentence legitimate?




She safes the dangerous area so it cannot be stumbled upon.




Obviously, modern usage would be "she makes safe", but some research on my part shows that "safes" is an acceptable "third-person singular simple present" form of safe.



Am I correct?










share|improve this question





















  • 6





    I'm guessing you'll spend more time explaining that you didn't mean "saves" than you gain by replacing "makes safe"

    – user888379
    8 hours ago






  • 5





    You could use 'safeguards' or 'secures' if you just want one word.

    – S Conroy
    8 hours ago











  • Can you give example sentences (author/date/links if possible) from your research?

    – Mitch
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    Wouldn't "secures" do much the same job?

    – WS2
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    Why bother with archaisms in industrial contexts? Also, you do not mean stumbled upon, which means to come upon by chance. You mean: so no one falls over junk (objects) on the floor.

    – Lambie
    6 hours ago













3












3








3








Though I know it's uncommon usage (and intentionally so). Is the follow sentence legitimate?




She safes the dangerous area so it cannot be stumbled upon.




Obviously, modern usage would be "she makes safe", but some research on my part shows that "safes" is an acceptable "third-person singular simple present" form of safe.



Am I correct?










share|improve this question
















Though I know it's uncommon usage (and intentionally so). Is the follow sentence legitimate?




She safes the dangerous area so it cannot be stumbled upon.




Obviously, modern usage would be "she makes safe", but some research on my part shows that "safes" is an acceptable "third-person singular simple present" form of safe.



Am I correct?







usage tenses verb-forms






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









Ayxan

1256 bronze badges




1256 bronze badges










asked 9 hours ago









Neal TibrewalaNeal Tibrewala

3851 silver badge5 bronze badges




3851 silver badge5 bronze badges










  • 6





    I'm guessing you'll spend more time explaining that you didn't mean "saves" than you gain by replacing "makes safe"

    – user888379
    8 hours ago






  • 5





    You could use 'safeguards' or 'secures' if you just want one word.

    – S Conroy
    8 hours ago











  • Can you give example sentences (author/date/links if possible) from your research?

    – Mitch
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    Wouldn't "secures" do much the same job?

    – WS2
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    Why bother with archaisms in industrial contexts? Also, you do not mean stumbled upon, which means to come upon by chance. You mean: so no one falls over junk (objects) on the floor.

    – Lambie
    6 hours ago












  • 6





    I'm guessing you'll spend more time explaining that you didn't mean "saves" than you gain by replacing "makes safe"

    – user888379
    8 hours ago






  • 5





    You could use 'safeguards' or 'secures' if you just want one word.

    – S Conroy
    8 hours ago











  • Can you give example sentences (author/date/links if possible) from your research?

    – Mitch
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    Wouldn't "secures" do much the same job?

    – WS2
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    Why bother with archaisms in industrial contexts? Also, you do not mean stumbled upon, which means to come upon by chance. You mean: so no one falls over junk (objects) on the floor.

    – Lambie
    6 hours ago







6




6





I'm guessing you'll spend more time explaining that you didn't mean "saves" than you gain by replacing "makes safe"

– user888379
8 hours ago





I'm guessing you'll spend more time explaining that you didn't mean "saves" than you gain by replacing "makes safe"

– user888379
8 hours ago




5




5





You could use 'safeguards' or 'secures' if you just want one word.

– S Conroy
8 hours ago





You could use 'safeguards' or 'secures' if you just want one word.

– S Conroy
8 hours ago













Can you give example sentences (author/date/links if possible) from your research?

– Mitch
8 hours ago





Can you give example sentences (author/date/links if possible) from your research?

– Mitch
8 hours ago




1




1





Wouldn't "secures" do much the same job?

– WS2
8 hours ago





Wouldn't "secures" do much the same job?

– WS2
8 hours ago




3




3





Why bother with archaisms in industrial contexts? Also, you do not mean stumbled upon, which means to come upon by chance. You mean: so no one falls over junk (objects) on the floor.

– Lambie
6 hours ago





Why bother with archaisms in industrial contexts? Also, you do not mean stumbled upon, which means to come upon by chance. You mean: so no one falls over junk (objects) on the floor.

– Lambie
6 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














Pretty sure we only use safe as a verb ordinance or firearms. There might be other domains (operations security maybe?) but by the verb safe we definitely mean operating a safety mechanism designed to keep the weapon from being firing/detonating.



The military definition is provided at The Free Dictionary, with citation to the US DOD (PDF).




As applied to weapons and ammunition, the changing from a state of readiness for initiation to a safe condition. Also called de-arming.







share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    Please provide evidence about the usage you are referring to.

    – user067531
    8 hours ago











  • @user067531 Just going off of experience, and many years of talking about guns and reading books about war. The military definition is provided here: thefreedictionary.com/safing With citation to the US DOD jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/dictionary.pdf

    – sas08
    7 hours ago











  • @user067531 you may note both examples you found are gun related. As are all the ones I can find on google. Hard too prove it hasn't been used outside those domains... but all I get for "safing" is articles on nukes and aircraft cannons. For instance: books.google.com/…

    – sas08
    7 hours ago











  • That wouldn’t make it a common usage, but a jargon one.

    – user067531
    7 hours ago







  • 1





    Don't quite remember the range in yards, but maybe it was 100 yards at Glakes NTC in the early 70s. I hit like 9 in the 10 ring, and clipped the outside on one shot. I was all excited, with buck fever because I thought I had qualified for marksman,but I was handing over the the rifle, and the range instructor screamed at me " Safe that weapon, asshole." Man...was I embarrased. A year on, and in a different geography, ...I heard a gunny screaming the same at a 3 stripe for the same reason on a .50 cal. His idea of safing included tilting the gun up pointing at the sky.

    – Cascabel
    6 hours ago



















4














Safe as a verb is quite uncommon, Wiktionary is one of the very few sources to show a few usage examples:




(transitive) To make something safe.



  • 2007, Rocky Raab, Mike Five Eight: Air War Over Cambodia: Air War Over Cambodia
    “It just trails behind the pylon until I land, then Cramer removes it when he safes the rocket pods. No evidence of anything when I taxi back inside the compound.”


  • 2012, Erik Seedhouse, Interplanetary Outpost
    One of the most important events after touchdown will be to safe the Dauntless, which will include purging the engines and shutting down the landing systems […]







share|improve this answer

























  • Not common, but it does get used: John always safes his gun before putting it away. Leslie is far less careful. "Let me just safe my gun" said John. Guns usually come with safety locks, so the usage is quite specific.

    – Wayfaring Stranger
    8 hours ago







  • 5





    It's not uncommon, it's just common only in a technical domain that requires the operation of mechanical safeties.

    – sas08
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    It is very uncommon and here can clearly be seen to be weapon-related or space-vehicule related.

    – Lambie
    6 hours ago












  • The OED attests this usage with citations from 1602 up through 2009. It belongs to their frequency band 3, which comprises 20% of the non-obsolete terms in the dictionary, and whose "Verbs tend to be either colloquial or technical, e.g. emote, mosey, josh, recapitalize."

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    @Cascabel I did not vote for closure. I am merely saying that in the civilian world it is not common. That is a fact. But tell me, would you say it for the context provided by the OP? Some find of factory floor? I doubt it...

    – Lambie
    5 hours ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507560%2fis-safes-an-acceptable-alternative-to-makes-safe%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














Pretty sure we only use safe as a verb ordinance or firearms. There might be other domains (operations security maybe?) but by the verb safe we definitely mean operating a safety mechanism designed to keep the weapon from being firing/detonating.



The military definition is provided at The Free Dictionary, with citation to the US DOD (PDF).




As applied to weapons and ammunition, the changing from a state of readiness for initiation to a safe condition. Also called de-arming.







share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    Please provide evidence about the usage you are referring to.

    – user067531
    8 hours ago











  • @user067531 Just going off of experience, and many years of talking about guns and reading books about war. The military definition is provided here: thefreedictionary.com/safing With citation to the US DOD jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/dictionary.pdf

    – sas08
    7 hours ago











  • @user067531 you may note both examples you found are gun related. As are all the ones I can find on google. Hard too prove it hasn't been used outside those domains... but all I get for "safing" is articles on nukes and aircraft cannons. For instance: books.google.com/…

    – sas08
    7 hours ago











  • That wouldn’t make it a common usage, but a jargon one.

    – user067531
    7 hours ago







  • 1





    Don't quite remember the range in yards, but maybe it was 100 yards at Glakes NTC in the early 70s. I hit like 9 in the 10 ring, and clipped the outside on one shot. I was all excited, with buck fever because I thought I had qualified for marksman,but I was handing over the the rifle, and the range instructor screamed at me " Safe that weapon, asshole." Man...was I embarrased. A year on, and in a different geography, ...I heard a gunny screaming the same at a 3 stripe for the same reason on a .50 cal. His idea of safing included tilting the gun up pointing at the sky.

    – Cascabel
    6 hours ago
















5














Pretty sure we only use safe as a verb ordinance or firearms. There might be other domains (operations security maybe?) but by the verb safe we definitely mean operating a safety mechanism designed to keep the weapon from being firing/detonating.



The military definition is provided at The Free Dictionary, with citation to the US DOD (PDF).




As applied to weapons and ammunition, the changing from a state of readiness for initiation to a safe condition. Also called de-arming.







share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    Please provide evidence about the usage you are referring to.

    – user067531
    8 hours ago











  • @user067531 Just going off of experience, and many years of talking about guns and reading books about war. The military definition is provided here: thefreedictionary.com/safing With citation to the US DOD jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/dictionary.pdf

    – sas08
    7 hours ago











  • @user067531 you may note both examples you found are gun related. As are all the ones I can find on google. Hard too prove it hasn't been used outside those domains... but all I get for "safing" is articles on nukes and aircraft cannons. For instance: books.google.com/…

    – sas08
    7 hours ago











  • That wouldn’t make it a common usage, but a jargon one.

    – user067531
    7 hours ago







  • 1





    Don't quite remember the range in yards, but maybe it was 100 yards at Glakes NTC in the early 70s. I hit like 9 in the 10 ring, and clipped the outside on one shot. I was all excited, with buck fever because I thought I had qualified for marksman,but I was handing over the the rifle, and the range instructor screamed at me " Safe that weapon, asshole." Man...was I embarrased. A year on, and in a different geography, ...I heard a gunny screaming the same at a 3 stripe for the same reason on a .50 cal. His idea of safing included tilting the gun up pointing at the sky.

    – Cascabel
    6 hours ago














5












5








5







Pretty sure we only use safe as a verb ordinance or firearms. There might be other domains (operations security maybe?) but by the verb safe we definitely mean operating a safety mechanism designed to keep the weapon from being firing/detonating.



The military definition is provided at The Free Dictionary, with citation to the US DOD (PDF).




As applied to weapons and ammunition, the changing from a state of readiness for initiation to a safe condition. Also called de-arming.







share|improve this answer















Pretty sure we only use safe as a verb ordinance or firearms. There might be other domains (operations security maybe?) but by the verb safe we definitely mean operating a safety mechanism designed to keep the weapon from being firing/detonating.



The military definition is provided at The Free Dictionary, with citation to the US DOD (PDF).




As applied to weapons and ammunition, the changing from a state of readiness for initiation to a safe condition. Also called de-arming.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 4 hours ago









Jason Bassford

26.3k3 gold badges35 silver badges66 bronze badges




26.3k3 gold badges35 silver badges66 bronze badges










answered 8 hours ago









sas08sas08

1466 bronze badges




1466 bronze badges










  • 1





    Please provide evidence about the usage you are referring to.

    – user067531
    8 hours ago











  • @user067531 Just going off of experience, and many years of talking about guns and reading books about war. The military definition is provided here: thefreedictionary.com/safing With citation to the US DOD jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/dictionary.pdf

    – sas08
    7 hours ago











  • @user067531 you may note both examples you found are gun related. As are all the ones I can find on google. Hard too prove it hasn't been used outside those domains... but all I get for "safing" is articles on nukes and aircraft cannons. For instance: books.google.com/…

    – sas08
    7 hours ago











  • That wouldn’t make it a common usage, but a jargon one.

    – user067531
    7 hours ago







  • 1





    Don't quite remember the range in yards, but maybe it was 100 yards at Glakes NTC in the early 70s. I hit like 9 in the 10 ring, and clipped the outside on one shot. I was all excited, with buck fever because I thought I had qualified for marksman,but I was handing over the the rifle, and the range instructor screamed at me " Safe that weapon, asshole." Man...was I embarrased. A year on, and in a different geography, ...I heard a gunny screaming the same at a 3 stripe for the same reason on a .50 cal. His idea of safing included tilting the gun up pointing at the sky.

    – Cascabel
    6 hours ago













  • 1





    Please provide evidence about the usage you are referring to.

    – user067531
    8 hours ago











  • @user067531 Just going off of experience, and many years of talking about guns and reading books about war. The military definition is provided here: thefreedictionary.com/safing With citation to the US DOD jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/dictionary.pdf

    – sas08
    7 hours ago











  • @user067531 you may note both examples you found are gun related. As are all the ones I can find on google. Hard too prove it hasn't been used outside those domains... but all I get for "safing" is articles on nukes and aircraft cannons. For instance: books.google.com/…

    – sas08
    7 hours ago











  • That wouldn’t make it a common usage, but a jargon one.

    – user067531
    7 hours ago







  • 1





    Don't quite remember the range in yards, but maybe it was 100 yards at Glakes NTC in the early 70s. I hit like 9 in the 10 ring, and clipped the outside on one shot. I was all excited, with buck fever because I thought I had qualified for marksman,but I was handing over the the rifle, and the range instructor screamed at me " Safe that weapon, asshole." Man...was I embarrased. A year on, and in a different geography, ...I heard a gunny screaming the same at a 3 stripe for the same reason on a .50 cal. His idea of safing included tilting the gun up pointing at the sky.

    – Cascabel
    6 hours ago








1




1





Please provide evidence about the usage you are referring to.

– user067531
8 hours ago





Please provide evidence about the usage you are referring to.

– user067531
8 hours ago













@user067531 Just going off of experience, and many years of talking about guns and reading books about war. The military definition is provided here: thefreedictionary.com/safing With citation to the US DOD jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/dictionary.pdf

– sas08
7 hours ago





@user067531 Just going off of experience, and many years of talking about guns and reading books about war. The military definition is provided here: thefreedictionary.com/safing With citation to the US DOD jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/dictionary.pdf

– sas08
7 hours ago













@user067531 you may note both examples you found are gun related. As are all the ones I can find on google. Hard too prove it hasn't been used outside those domains... but all I get for "safing" is articles on nukes and aircraft cannons. For instance: books.google.com/…

– sas08
7 hours ago





@user067531 you may note both examples you found are gun related. As are all the ones I can find on google. Hard too prove it hasn't been used outside those domains... but all I get for "safing" is articles on nukes and aircraft cannons. For instance: books.google.com/…

– sas08
7 hours ago













That wouldn’t make it a common usage, but a jargon one.

– user067531
7 hours ago






That wouldn’t make it a common usage, but a jargon one.

– user067531
7 hours ago





1




1





Don't quite remember the range in yards, but maybe it was 100 yards at Glakes NTC in the early 70s. I hit like 9 in the 10 ring, and clipped the outside on one shot. I was all excited, with buck fever because I thought I had qualified for marksman,but I was handing over the the rifle, and the range instructor screamed at me " Safe that weapon, asshole." Man...was I embarrased. A year on, and in a different geography, ...I heard a gunny screaming the same at a 3 stripe for the same reason on a .50 cal. His idea of safing included tilting the gun up pointing at the sky.

– Cascabel
6 hours ago






Don't quite remember the range in yards, but maybe it was 100 yards at Glakes NTC in the early 70s. I hit like 9 in the 10 ring, and clipped the outside on one shot. I was all excited, with buck fever because I thought I had qualified for marksman,but I was handing over the the rifle, and the range instructor screamed at me " Safe that weapon, asshole." Man...was I embarrased. A year on, and in a different geography, ...I heard a gunny screaming the same at a 3 stripe for the same reason on a .50 cal. His idea of safing included tilting the gun up pointing at the sky.

– Cascabel
6 hours ago














4














Safe as a verb is quite uncommon, Wiktionary is one of the very few sources to show a few usage examples:




(transitive) To make something safe.



  • 2007, Rocky Raab, Mike Five Eight: Air War Over Cambodia: Air War Over Cambodia
    “It just trails behind the pylon until I land, then Cramer removes it when he safes the rocket pods. No evidence of anything when I taxi back inside the compound.”


  • 2012, Erik Seedhouse, Interplanetary Outpost
    One of the most important events after touchdown will be to safe the Dauntless, which will include purging the engines and shutting down the landing systems […]







share|improve this answer

























  • Not common, but it does get used: John always safes his gun before putting it away. Leslie is far less careful. "Let me just safe my gun" said John. Guns usually come with safety locks, so the usage is quite specific.

    – Wayfaring Stranger
    8 hours ago







  • 5





    It's not uncommon, it's just common only in a technical domain that requires the operation of mechanical safeties.

    – sas08
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    It is very uncommon and here can clearly be seen to be weapon-related or space-vehicule related.

    – Lambie
    6 hours ago












  • The OED attests this usage with citations from 1602 up through 2009. It belongs to their frequency band 3, which comprises 20% of the non-obsolete terms in the dictionary, and whose "Verbs tend to be either colloquial or technical, e.g. emote, mosey, josh, recapitalize."

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    @Cascabel I did not vote for closure. I am merely saying that in the civilian world it is not common. That is a fact. But tell me, would you say it for the context provided by the OP? Some find of factory floor? I doubt it...

    – Lambie
    5 hours ago















4














Safe as a verb is quite uncommon, Wiktionary is one of the very few sources to show a few usage examples:




(transitive) To make something safe.



  • 2007, Rocky Raab, Mike Five Eight: Air War Over Cambodia: Air War Over Cambodia
    “It just trails behind the pylon until I land, then Cramer removes it when he safes the rocket pods. No evidence of anything when I taxi back inside the compound.”


  • 2012, Erik Seedhouse, Interplanetary Outpost
    One of the most important events after touchdown will be to safe the Dauntless, which will include purging the engines and shutting down the landing systems […]







share|improve this answer

























  • Not common, but it does get used: John always safes his gun before putting it away. Leslie is far less careful. "Let me just safe my gun" said John. Guns usually come with safety locks, so the usage is quite specific.

    – Wayfaring Stranger
    8 hours ago







  • 5





    It's not uncommon, it's just common only in a technical domain that requires the operation of mechanical safeties.

    – sas08
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    It is very uncommon and here can clearly be seen to be weapon-related or space-vehicule related.

    – Lambie
    6 hours ago












  • The OED attests this usage with citations from 1602 up through 2009. It belongs to their frequency band 3, which comprises 20% of the non-obsolete terms in the dictionary, and whose "Verbs tend to be either colloquial or technical, e.g. emote, mosey, josh, recapitalize."

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    @Cascabel I did not vote for closure. I am merely saying that in the civilian world it is not common. That is a fact. But tell me, would you say it for the context provided by the OP? Some find of factory floor? I doubt it...

    – Lambie
    5 hours ago













4












4








4







Safe as a verb is quite uncommon, Wiktionary is one of the very few sources to show a few usage examples:




(transitive) To make something safe.



  • 2007, Rocky Raab, Mike Five Eight: Air War Over Cambodia: Air War Over Cambodia
    “It just trails behind the pylon until I land, then Cramer removes it when he safes the rocket pods. No evidence of anything when I taxi back inside the compound.”


  • 2012, Erik Seedhouse, Interplanetary Outpost
    One of the most important events after touchdown will be to safe the Dauntless, which will include purging the engines and shutting down the landing systems […]







share|improve this answer













Safe as a verb is quite uncommon, Wiktionary is one of the very few sources to show a few usage examples:




(transitive) To make something safe.



  • 2007, Rocky Raab, Mike Five Eight: Air War Over Cambodia: Air War Over Cambodia
    “It just trails behind the pylon until I land, then Cramer removes it when he safes the rocket pods. No evidence of anything when I taxi back inside the compound.”


  • 2012, Erik Seedhouse, Interplanetary Outpost
    One of the most important events after touchdown will be to safe the Dauntless, which will include purging the engines and shutting down the landing systems […]








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 8 hours ago









user067531user067531

30.7k13 gold badges86 silver badges181 bronze badges




30.7k13 gold badges86 silver badges181 bronze badges















  • Not common, but it does get used: John always safes his gun before putting it away. Leslie is far less careful. "Let me just safe my gun" said John. Guns usually come with safety locks, so the usage is quite specific.

    – Wayfaring Stranger
    8 hours ago







  • 5





    It's not uncommon, it's just common only in a technical domain that requires the operation of mechanical safeties.

    – sas08
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    It is very uncommon and here can clearly be seen to be weapon-related or space-vehicule related.

    – Lambie
    6 hours ago












  • The OED attests this usage with citations from 1602 up through 2009. It belongs to their frequency band 3, which comprises 20% of the non-obsolete terms in the dictionary, and whose "Verbs tend to be either colloquial or technical, e.g. emote, mosey, josh, recapitalize."

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    @Cascabel I did not vote for closure. I am merely saying that in the civilian world it is not common. That is a fact. But tell me, would you say it for the context provided by the OP? Some find of factory floor? I doubt it...

    – Lambie
    5 hours ago

















  • Not common, but it does get used: John always safes his gun before putting it away. Leslie is far less careful. "Let me just safe my gun" said John. Guns usually come with safety locks, so the usage is quite specific.

    – Wayfaring Stranger
    8 hours ago







  • 5





    It's not uncommon, it's just common only in a technical domain that requires the operation of mechanical safeties.

    – sas08
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    It is very uncommon and here can clearly be seen to be weapon-related or space-vehicule related.

    – Lambie
    6 hours ago












  • The OED attests this usage with citations from 1602 up through 2009. It belongs to their frequency band 3, which comprises 20% of the non-obsolete terms in the dictionary, and whose "Verbs tend to be either colloquial or technical, e.g. emote, mosey, josh, recapitalize."

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    @Cascabel I did not vote for closure. I am merely saying that in the civilian world it is not common. That is a fact. But tell me, would you say it for the context provided by the OP? Some find of factory floor? I doubt it...

    – Lambie
    5 hours ago
















Not common, but it does get used: John always safes his gun before putting it away. Leslie is far less careful. "Let me just safe my gun" said John. Guns usually come with safety locks, so the usage is quite specific.

– Wayfaring Stranger
8 hours ago






Not common, but it does get used: John always safes his gun before putting it away. Leslie is far less careful. "Let me just safe my gun" said John. Guns usually come with safety locks, so the usage is quite specific.

– Wayfaring Stranger
8 hours ago





5




5





It's not uncommon, it's just common only in a technical domain that requires the operation of mechanical safeties.

– sas08
8 hours ago





It's not uncommon, it's just common only in a technical domain that requires the operation of mechanical safeties.

– sas08
8 hours ago




2




2





It is very uncommon and here can clearly be seen to be weapon-related or space-vehicule related.

– Lambie
6 hours ago






It is very uncommon and here can clearly be seen to be weapon-related or space-vehicule related.

– Lambie
6 hours ago














The OED attests this usage with citations from 1602 up through 2009. It belongs to their frequency band 3, which comprises 20% of the non-obsolete terms in the dictionary, and whose "Verbs tend to be either colloquial or technical, e.g. emote, mosey, josh, recapitalize."

– tchrist
5 hours ago





The OED attests this usage with citations from 1602 up through 2009. It belongs to their frequency band 3, which comprises 20% of the non-obsolete terms in the dictionary, and whose "Verbs tend to be either colloquial or technical, e.g. emote, mosey, josh, recapitalize."

– tchrist
5 hours ago




1




1





@Cascabel I did not vote for closure. I am merely saying that in the civilian world it is not common. That is a fact. But tell me, would you say it for the context provided by the OP? Some find of factory floor? I doubt it...

– Lambie
5 hours ago





@Cascabel I did not vote for closure. I am merely saying that in the civilian world it is not common. That is a fact. But tell me, would you say it for the context provided by the OP? Some find of factory floor? I doubt it...

– Lambie
5 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507560%2fis-safes-an-acceptable-alternative-to-makes-safe%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367