The move Bg4 in the Pirc defenseHow do I use the analysis output of a UCI engine?B50: Sicilian Defense 3. Bc4Is Bg4+ good in this position in the Alekhine Defense?White's c5 in Semi-Slav (or Slav) DefenseAn unnecessary threat?what does this move achieve?What is this opening/position called, and what is white’s best move?What is the most suitable position for a bishop here?Strategy for next move in a crowded situationWeakening the kingside with g5

Under what circumstances does intermodulation become an issue in a filter after LNA setup?

Router on a stick not connecting 2 different VLANs

50-move rule: only the last 50 or any consecutive 50?

How can I download a file from a host I can only SSH to through another host?

Can you board the plane when your passport is valid less than 3 months?

How do I feed my black hole?

The move Bg4 in the Pirc defense

Cost of oil sanctions to world's consumers

Why does matter stays collapsed following the supernova explosion?

Given current technology, could TV display screens double as video camera sensors?

1mth baby boy keeps peeing through diapers, sometimes diper seems practically unused

Hangman game in Python - need feedback on the quality of code

Why is a statement like 1 + n *= 3 allowed in Ruby?

Why is "-ber" the suffix of the last four months of the year?

Make utility using LINQ

Is it legal for source code containing undefined behavior to crash the compiler?

What are these white rings in the Undead parish?

Can an Arcane Focus be embedded in one's body?

Is it bad for SEO have the same site on a .gr and a .com with both English and Greek content?

Semantic difference between regular and irregular 'backen'

Prevent use of CNAME record for untrusted domain

Do you pay one or two mana to bounce a transformed Delver of Secrets with Repeal?

Discussing work with supervisor in an invited dinner with his family

What stops you from using fixed income in developing countries?



The move Bg4 in the Pirc defense


How do I use the analysis output of a UCI engine?B50: Sicilian Defense 3. Bc4Is Bg4+ good in this position in the Alekhine Defense?White's c5 in Semi-Slav (or Slav) DefenseAn unnecessary threat?what does this move achieve?What is this opening/position called, and what is white’s best move?What is the most suitable position for a bishop here?Strategy for next move in a crowded situationWeakening the kingside with g5






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















I am having trouble understanding a move studied in an opening book. The move is Bg4 in the Pirc defence in this position.



What is the point of aiming to exchange the bishop on f3? The point d4 does not seem to be the reason.










share|improve this question


























  • Yes, sorry. I will correct that.

    – Maths64
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    Why do you say that the point on d4 is not the reason? It is the natural target for the bishop on g7, and even if there is no immediate threat to d4 an exchange on f3 would still weaken d4. Even if d4 is not the only reason for Bg4, it is still at least a reason.

    – John Coleman
    7 hours ago


















3















I am having trouble understanding a move studied in an opening book. The move is Bg4 in the Pirc defence in this position.



What is the point of aiming to exchange the bishop on f3? The point d4 does not seem to be the reason.










share|improve this question


























  • Yes, sorry. I will correct that.

    – Maths64
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    Why do you say that the point on d4 is not the reason? It is the natural target for the bishop on g7, and even if there is no immediate threat to d4 an exchange on f3 would still weaken d4. Even if d4 is not the only reason for Bg4, it is still at least a reason.

    – John Coleman
    7 hours ago














3












3








3








I am having trouble understanding a move studied in an opening book. The move is Bg4 in the Pirc defence in this position.



What is the point of aiming to exchange the bishop on f3? The point d4 does not seem to be the reason.










share|improve this question
















I am having trouble understanding a move studied in an opening book. The move is Bg4 in the Pirc defence in this position.



What is the point of aiming to exchange the bishop on f3? The point d4 does not seem to be the reason.







analysis






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 37 mins ago









Brian Towers

20.9k4 gold badges41 silver badges92 bronze badges




20.9k4 gold badges41 silver badges92 bronze badges










asked 8 hours ago









Maths64Maths64

5213 silver badges15 bronze badges




5213 silver badges15 bronze badges















  • Yes, sorry. I will correct that.

    – Maths64
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    Why do you say that the point on d4 is not the reason? It is the natural target for the bishop on g7, and even if there is no immediate threat to d4 an exchange on f3 would still weaken d4. Even if d4 is not the only reason for Bg4, it is still at least a reason.

    – John Coleman
    7 hours ago


















  • Yes, sorry. I will correct that.

    – Maths64
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    Why do you say that the point on d4 is not the reason? It is the natural target for the bishop on g7, and even if there is no immediate threat to d4 an exchange on f3 would still weaken d4. Even if d4 is not the only reason for Bg4, it is still at least a reason.

    – John Coleman
    7 hours ago

















Yes, sorry. I will correct that.

– Maths64
7 hours ago





Yes, sorry. I will correct that.

– Maths64
7 hours ago




2




2





Why do you say that the point on d4 is not the reason? It is the natural target for the bishop on g7, and even if there is no immediate threat to d4 an exchange on f3 would still weaken d4. Even if d4 is not the only reason for Bg4, it is still at least a reason.

– John Coleman
7 hours ago






Why do you say that the point on d4 is not the reason? It is the natural target for the bishop on g7, and even if there is no immediate threat to d4 an exchange on f3 would still weaken d4. Even if d4 is not the only reason for Bg4, it is still at least a reason.

– John Coleman
7 hours ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2















Compare that position with other variations where White does not allow ...Bg4 to be played. Black often struggles with the development of the c8 bishop.



Also, the central dark squares are indeed a target, so ...Bg4 is clearly helping there (what else could he possibly do in a different square?) Pawn breaks with ...e5 or ...c5 are a possibility as well






share|improve this answer



























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "435"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f25230%2fthe-move-bg4-in-the-pirc-defense%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2















    Compare that position with other variations where White does not allow ...Bg4 to be played. Black often struggles with the development of the c8 bishop.



    Also, the central dark squares are indeed a target, so ...Bg4 is clearly helping there (what else could he possibly do in a different square?) Pawn breaks with ...e5 or ...c5 are a possibility as well






    share|improve this answer





























      2















      Compare that position with other variations where White does not allow ...Bg4 to be played. Black often struggles with the development of the c8 bishop.



      Also, the central dark squares are indeed a target, so ...Bg4 is clearly helping there (what else could he possibly do in a different square?) Pawn breaks with ...e5 or ...c5 are a possibility as well






      share|improve this answer



























        2














        2










        2









        Compare that position with other variations where White does not allow ...Bg4 to be played. Black often struggles with the development of the c8 bishop.



        Also, the central dark squares are indeed a target, so ...Bg4 is clearly helping there (what else could he possibly do in a different square?) Pawn breaks with ...e5 or ...c5 are a possibility as well






        share|improve this answer













        Compare that position with other variations where White does not allow ...Bg4 to be played. Black often struggles with the development of the c8 bishop.



        Also, the central dark squares are indeed a target, so ...Bg4 is clearly helping there (what else could he possibly do in a different square?) Pawn breaks with ...e5 or ...c5 are a possibility as well







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 7 hours ago









        DavidDavid

        2,5745 silver badges15 bronze badges




        2,5745 silver badges15 bronze badges






























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Chess Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f25230%2fthe-move-bg4-in-the-pirc-defense%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її