To what extent are we obligated to continue to procreate beyond having two kids?Does R. Avraham Ben HaRambam really hold that only one child is necessary for peru u'revu?To what extent can a Beit Din actually force someone to get married?Reason why women are obligated to eat MatzaWhat are the sources of Jewish law?What are the authoritative Jewish documents?Are Noahides obligated in the commandment of Yibum?In how many of the 613 mitzvot are women obligated?To what extent are non-Chasidim bound by kabbalah?

Rent contract say that pets are not allowed. Possible repercussions if bringing the pet anyway?

Does Yeshayahu 43:10b / 43:13a imply HaShem was created?

Nothing like a good ol' game of ModTen

How does the OS tell whether an "Address is already in use"?

using resizegather inside tabular: how to remove extra vertical space above and below the equation?

How were medieval castles built in swamps or marshes without draining them?

Joining lists with same elements

Handling Disruptive Student on the Autism Spectrum

What to look for in a spotting scope?

Light Themed Cryptic

Evaluated vs. unevaluated Association

What is the loud noise of a helicopter when the rotors are not yet moving?

What stops you from using fixed income in developing countries?

How many lines of code does the original TeX contain?

Retroactively modifying humans for Earth?

Can Orcus use Multiattack with any melee weapon?

What are the occurences of total war in the Native Americans?

Duplicate instruments in unison in an orchestra

How to gently end involvement with an online community?

Breaker Mapping Questions

Why is "-ber" the suffix of the last four months of the year?

What is the meaning of “these lederhosen are riding up my Bundesliga”?

How does encoder decoder network works?

Half filled water bottle



To what extent are we obligated to continue to procreate beyond having two kids?


Does R. Avraham Ben HaRambam really hold that only one child is necessary for peru u'revu?To what extent can a Beit Din actually force someone to get married?Reason why women are obligated to eat MatzaWhat are the sources of Jewish law?What are the authoritative Jewish documents?Are Noahides obligated in the commandment of Yibum?In how many of the 613 mitzvot are women obligated?To what extent are non-Chasidim bound by kabbalah?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















Pru Urvu is a very important Mitzvah.



And yet many families arrive eventually to an uncomfortable question of family planning, i.g. simply stopping procreation for many different reasons.



If one has fulfilled the Mitzvah by having two boys and a girl (for all approaches), to what extent are we obligated to continue to procreate or it is just an optional Mitzvah?










share|improve this question





















  • 2





    related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/94001/170

    – msh210
    7 hours ago

















3















Pru Urvu is a very important Mitzvah.



And yet many families arrive eventually to an uncomfortable question of family planning, i.g. simply stopping procreation for many different reasons.



If one has fulfilled the Mitzvah by having two boys and a girl (for all approaches), to what extent are we obligated to continue to procreate or it is just an optional Mitzvah?










share|improve this question





















  • 2





    related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/94001/170

    – msh210
    7 hours ago













3












3








3








Pru Urvu is a very important Mitzvah.



And yet many families arrive eventually to an uncomfortable question of family planning, i.g. simply stopping procreation for many different reasons.



If one has fulfilled the Mitzvah by having two boys and a girl (for all approaches), to what extent are we obligated to continue to procreate or it is just an optional Mitzvah?










share|improve this question
















Pru Urvu is a very important Mitzvah.



And yet many families arrive eventually to an uncomfortable question of family planning, i.g. simply stopping procreation for many different reasons.



If one has fulfilled the Mitzvah by having two boys and a girl (for all approaches), to what extent are we obligated to continue to procreate or it is just an optional Mitzvah?







halacha pru-urvu






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 10 mins ago









Double AA

81.9k6 gold badges207 silver badges460 bronze badges




81.9k6 gold badges207 silver badges460 bronze badges










asked 9 hours ago









Al BerkoAl Berko

9,0032 gold badges7 silver badges35 bronze badges




9,0032 gold badges7 silver badges35 bronze badges










  • 2





    related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/94001/170

    – msh210
    7 hours ago












  • 2





    related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/94001/170

    – msh210
    7 hours ago







2




2





related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/94001/170

– msh210
7 hours ago





related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/94001/170

– msh210
7 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6















To quote part of R. Hershel Schachter's article on the topic:




It is now several years into their marriage, and our couple has already been blessed with a son and a daughter. What now? The Talmud tells us in the name of Rabbi Yehoshua that even after one has fulfilled the biblical obligation of Pru U'rvu, he is still required to continue to have children in his later years. This idea is derived from the words of Koheles (11:6) בבוקר זרע את זרעך ולערב אל תנח ידך, v'loerev al tanach Yodecho - 'In the morning you should plant your seed and in the evening, as well, you should continue to do the same." The consensus among the Poskim is that this law of Rabbi Yehoshua is not biblical in nature, but only rabbinic.



According to the Aruch HaShulchon, the Rambam's view is that לערב אל תנח ידך does not constitute an independent rabbinic mitzvah, but is rather a Hiddur Mitzvah Min Hamuvchar (a very desirable enhancement) of Piryah V'rivyah. Hence it follows, as the Ramban has pointed out, that although one who violates any rabbinic law is considered wicked (a Rosho) and may be referred to by other people as such, one who refuses to observe this ruling of Rabbi Yehoshua regarding Lo'erev al tanach yodecha would not be considered a sinner. And although Beth Din could force someone to get married even if he did not want to, Beth Din would not force one to observe this mitzvah of having more children than the minimal two. This principle of Rabbi Yeshoshua is a statement of the proper mode of behavior (derech eretz) rather than an official rabbinic enachnent (takkanah).







share|improve this answer

























  • So we all agree, it's either a mitzvah minhatorah or just something nice to do or possibly somewhere inbetween ;)

    – Josh K
    7 hours ago











  • It would be worthwhile to pursue the change in language. The 1st half of the posuk from Kohelet is clearly referring to reproduction. But what is the meaning of "ידך"? Why is that taken to mean 'continue to have children'? And why is it stated in the language of a prohibition, while the 1st half of the posuk is a positive command?

    – Yaacov Deane
    1 hour ago




















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6















To quote part of R. Hershel Schachter's article on the topic:




It is now several years into their marriage, and our couple has already been blessed with a son and a daughter. What now? The Talmud tells us in the name of Rabbi Yehoshua that even after one has fulfilled the biblical obligation of Pru U'rvu, he is still required to continue to have children in his later years. This idea is derived from the words of Koheles (11:6) בבוקר זרע את זרעך ולערב אל תנח ידך, v'loerev al tanach Yodecho - 'In the morning you should plant your seed and in the evening, as well, you should continue to do the same." The consensus among the Poskim is that this law of Rabbi Yehoshua is not biblical in nature, but only rabbinic.



According to the Aruch HaShulchon, the Rambam's view is that לערב אל תנח ידך does not constitute an independent rabbinic mitzvah, but is rather a Hiddur Mitzvah Min Hamuvchar (a very desirable enhancement) of Piryah V'rivyah. Hence it follows, as the Ramban has pointed out, that although one who violates any rabbinic law is considered wicked (a Rosho) and may be referred to by other people as such, one who refuses to observe this ruling of Rabbi Yehoshua regarding Lo'erev al tanach yodecha would not be considered a sinner. And although Beth Din could force someone to get married even if he did not want to, Beth Din would not force one to observe this mitzvah of having more children than the minimal two. This principle of Rabbi Yeshoshua is a statement of the proper mode of behavior (derech eretz) rather than an official rabbinic enachnent (takkanah).







share|improve this answer

























  • So we all agree, it's either a mitzvah minhatorah or just something nice to do or possibly somewhere inbetween ;)

    – Josh K
    7 hours ago











  • It would be worthwhile to pursue the change in language. The 1st half of the posuk from Kohelet is clearly referring to reproduction. But what is the meaning of "ידך"? Why is that taken to mean 'continue to have children'? And why is it stated in the language of a prohibition, while the 1st half of the posuk is a positive command?

    – Yaacov Deane
    1 hour ago















6















To quote part of R. Hershel Schachter's article on the topic:




It is now several years into their marriage, and our couple has already been blessed with a son and a daughter. What now? The Talmud tells us in the name of Rabbi Yehoshua that even after one has fulfilled the biblical obligation of Pru U'rvu, he is still required to continue to have children in his later years. This idea is derived from the words of Koheles (11:6) בבוקר זרע את זרעך ולערב אל תנח ידך, v'loerev al tanach Yodecho - 'In the morning you should plant your seed and in the evening, as well, you should continue to do the same." The consensus among the Poskim is that this law of Rabbi Yehoshua is not biblical in nature, but only rabbinic.



According to the Aruch HaShulchon, the Rambam's view is that לערב אל תנח ידך does not constitute an independent rabbinic mitzvah, but is rather a Hiddur Mitzvah Min Hamuvchar (a very desirable enhancement) of Piryah V'rivyah. Hence it follows, as the Ramban has pointed out, that although one who violates any rabbinic law is considered wicked (a Rosho) and may be referred to by other people as such, one who refuses to observe this ruling of Rabbi Yehoshua regarding Lo'erev al tanach yodecha would not be considered a sinner. And although Beth Din could force someone to get married even if he did not want to, Beth Din would not force one to observe this mitzvah of having more children than the minimal two. This principle of Rabbi Yeshoshua is a statement of the proper mode of behavior (derech eretz) rather than an official rabbinic enachnent (takkanah).







share|improve this answer

























  • So we all agree, it's either a mitzvah minhatorah or just something nice to do or possibly somewhere inbetween ;)

    – Josh K
    7 hours ago











  • It would be worthwhile to pursue the change in language. The 1st half of the posuk from Kohelet is clearly referring to reproduction. But what is the meaning of "ידך"? Why is that taken to mean 'continue to have children'? And why is it stated in the language of a prohibition, while the 1st half of the posuk is a positive command?

    – Yaacov Deane
    1 hour ago













6














6










6









To quote part of R. Hershel Schachter's article on the topic:




It is now several years into their marriage, and our couple has already been blessed with a son and a daughter. What now? The Talmud tells us in the name of Rabbi Yehoshua that even after one has fulfilled the biblical obligation of Pru U'rvu, he is still required to continue to have children in his later years. This idea is derived from the words of Koheles (11:6) בבוקר זרע את זרעך ולערב אל תנח ידך, v'loerev al tanach Yodecho - 'In the morning you should plant your seed and in the evening, as well, you should continue to do the same." The consensus among the Poskim is that this law of Rabbi Yehoshua is not biblical in nature, but only rabbinic.



According to the Aruch HaShulchon, the Rambam's view is that לערב אל תנח ידך does not constitute an independent rabbinic mitzvah, but is rather a Hiddur Mitzvah Min Hamuvchar (a very desirable enhancement) of Piryah V'rivyah. Hence it follows, as the Ramban has pointed out, that although one who violates any rabbinic law is considered wicked (a Rosho) and may be referred to by other people as such, one who refuses to observe this ruling of Rabbi Yehoshua regarding Lo'erev al tanach yodecha would not be considered a sinner. And although Beth Din could force someone to get married even if he did not want to, Beth Din would not force one to observe this mitzvah of having more children than the minimal two. This principle of Rabbi Yeshoshua is a statement of the proper mode of behavior (derech eretz) rather than an official rabbinic enachnent (takkanah).







share|improve this answer













To quote part of R. Hershel Schachter's article on the topic:




It is now several years into their marriage, and our couple has already been blessed with a son and a daughter. What now? The Talmud tells us in the name of Rabbi Yehoshua that even after one has fulfilled the biblical obligation of Pru U'rvu, he is still required to continue to have children in his later years. This idea is derived from the words of Koheles (11:6) בבוקר זרע את זרעך ולערב אל תנח ידך, v'loerev al tanach Yodecho - 'In the morning you should plant your seed and in the evening, as well, you should continue to do the same." The consensus among the Poskim is that this law of Rabbi Yehoshua is not biblical in nature, but only rabbinic.



According to the Aruch HaShulchon, the Rambam's view is that לערב אל תנח ידך does not constitute an independent rabbinic mitzvah, but is rather a Hiddur Mitzvah Min Hamuvchar (a very desirable enhancement) of Piryah V'rivyah. Hence it follows, as the Ramban has pointed out, that although one who violates any rabbinic law is considered wicked (a Rosho) and may be referred to by other people as such, one who refuses to observe this ruling of Rabbi Yehoshua regarding Lo'erev al tanach yodecha would not be considered a sinner. And although Beth Din could force someone to get married even if he did not want to, Beth Din would not force one to observe this mitzvah of having more children than the minimal two. This principle of Rabbi Yeshoshua is a statement of the proper mode of behavior (derech eretz) rather than an official rabbinic enachnent (takkanah).








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 8 hours ago









Joel KJoel K

19.2k2 gold badges34 silver badges111 bronze badges




19.2k2 gold badges34 silver badges111 bronze badges















  • So we all agree, it's either a mitzvah minhatorah or just something nice to do or possibly somewhere inbetween ;)

    – Josh K
    7 hours ago











  • It would be worthwhile to pursue the change in language. The 1st half of the posuk from Kohelet is clearly referring to reproduction. But what is the meaning of "ידך"? Why is that taken to mean 'continue to have children'? And why is it stated in the language of a prohibition, while the 1st half of the posuk is a positive command?

    – Yaacov Deane
    1 hour ago

















  • So we all agree, it's either a mitzvah minhatorah or just something nice to do or possibly somewhere inbetween ;)

    – Josh K
    7 hours ago











  • It would be worthwhile to pursue the change in language. The 1st half of the posuk from Kohelet is clearly referring to reproduction. But what is the meaning of "ידך"? Why is that taken to mean 'continue to have children'? And why is it stated in the language of a prohibition, while the 1st half of the posuk is a positive command?

    – Yaacov Deane
    1 hour ago
















So we all agree, it's either a mitzvah minhatorah or just something nice to do or possibly somewhere inbetween ;)

– Josh K
7 hours ago





So we all agree, it's either a mitzvah minhatorah or just something nice to do or possibly somewhere inbetween ;)

– Josh K
7 hours ago













It would be worthwhile to pursue the change in language. The 1st half of the posuk from Kohelet is clearly referring to reproduction. But what is the meaning of "ידך"? Why is that taken to mean 'continue to have children'? And why is it stated in the language of a prohibition, while the 1st half of the posuk is a positive command?

– Yaacov Deane
1 hour ago





It would be worthwhile to pursue the change in language. The 1st half of the posuk from Kohelet is clearly referring to reproduction. But what is the meaning of "ידך"? Why is that taken to mean 'continue to have children'? And why is it stated in the language of a prohibition, while the 1st half of the posuk is a positive command?

– Yaacov Deane
1 hour ago



Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367