To what extent are we obligated to continue to procreate beyond having two kids?Does R. Avraham Ben HaRambam really hold that only one child is necessary for peru u'revu?To what extent can a Beit Din actually force someone to get married?Reason why women are obligated to eat MatzaWhat are the sources of Jewish law?What are the authoritative Jewish documents?Are Noahides obligated in the commandment of Yibum?In how many of the 613 mitzvot are women obligated?To what extent are non-Chasidim bound by kabbalah?
Rent contract say that pets are not allowed. Possible repercussions if bringing the pet anyway?
Does Yeshayahu 43:10b / 43:13a imply HaShem was created?
Nothing like a good ol' game of ModTen
How does the OS tell whether an "Address is already in use"?
using resizegather inside tabular: how to remove extra vertical space above and below the equation?
How were medieval castles built in swamps or marshes without draining them?
Joining lists with same elements
Handling Disruptive Student on the Autism Spectrum
What to look for in a spotting scope?
Light Themed Cryptic
Evaluated vs. unevaluated Association
What is the loud noise of a helicopter when the rotors are not yet moving?
What stops you from using fixed income in developing countries?
How many lines of code does the original TeX contain?
Retroactively modifying humans for Earth?
Can Orcus use Multiattack with any melee weapon?
What are the occurences of total war in the Native Americans?
Duplicate instruments in unison in an orchestra
How to gently end involvement with an online community?
Breaker Mapping Questions
Why is "-ber" the suffix of the last four months of the year?
What is the meaning of “these lederhosen are riding up my Bundesliga”?
How does encoder decoder network works?
Half filled water bottle
To what extent are we obligated to continue to procreate beyond having two kids?
Does R. Avraham Ben HaRambam really hold that only one child is necessary for peru u'revu?To what extent can a Beit Din actually force someone to get married?Reason why women are obligated to eat MatzaWhat are the sources of Jewish law?What are the authoritative Jewish documents?Are Noahides obligated in the commandment of Yibum?In how many of the 613 mitzvot are women obligated?To what extent are non-Chasidim bound by kabbalah?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Pru Urvu is a very important Mitzvah.
And yet many families arrive eventually to an uncomfortable question of family planning, i.g. simply stopping procreation for many different reasons.
If one has fulfilled the Mitzvah by having two boys and a girl (for all approaches), to what extent are we obligated to continue to procreate or it is just an optional Mitzvah?
halacha pru-urvu
add a comment |
Pru Urvu is a very important Mitzvah.
And yet many families arrive eventually to an uncomfortable question of family planning, i.g. simply stopping procreation for many different reasons.
If one has fulfilled the Mitzvah by having two boys and a girl (for all approaches), to what extent are we obligated to continue to procreate or it is just an optional Mitzvah?
halacha pru-urvu
2
related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/94001/170
– msh210♦
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Pru Urvu is a very important Mitzvah.
And yet many families arrive eventually to an uncomfortable question of family planning, i.g. simply stopping procreation for many different reasons.
If one has fulfilled the Mitzvah by having two boys and a girl (for all approaches), to what extent are we obligated to continue to procreate or it is just an optional Mitzvah?
halacha pru-urvu
Pru Urvu is a very important Mitzvah.
And yet many families arrive eventually to an uncomfortable question of family planning, i.g. simply stopping procreation for many different reasons.
If one has fulfilled the Mitzvah by having two boys and a girl (for all approaches), to what extent are we obligated to continue to procreate or it is just an optional Mitzvah?
halacha pru-urvu
halacha pru-urvu
edited 10 mins ago
Double AA♦
81.9k6 gold badges207 silver badges460 bronze badges
81.9k6 gold badges207 silver badges460 bronze badges
asked 9 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
9,0032 gold badges7 silver badges35 bronze badges
9,0032 gold badges7 silver badges35 bronze badges
2
related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/94001/170
– msh210♦
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2
related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/94001/170
– msh210♦
7 hours ago
2
2
related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/94001/170
– msh210♦
7 hours ago
related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/94001/170
– msh210♦
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
To quote part of R. Hershel Schachter's article on the topic:
It is now several years into their marriage, and our couple has already been blessed with a son and a daughter. What now? The Talmud tells us in the name of Rabbi Yehoshua that even after one has fulfilled the biblical obligation of Pru U'rvu, he is still required to continue to have children in his later years. This idea is derived from the words of Koheles (11:6) בבוקר זרע את זרעך ולערב אל תנח ידך, v'loerev al tanach Yodecho - 'In the morning you should plant your seed and in the evening, as well, you should continue to do the same." The consensus among the Poskim is that this law of Rabbi Yehoshua is not biblical in nature, but only rabbinic.
According to the Aruch HaShulchon, the Rambam's view is that לערב אל תנח ידך does not constitute an independent rabbinic mitzvah, but is rather a Hiddur Mitzvah Min Hamuvchar (a very desirable enhancement) of Piryah V'rivyah. Hence it follows, as the Ramban has pointed out, that although one who violates any rabbinic law is considered wicked (a Rosho) and may be referred to by other people as such, one who refuses to observe this ruling of Rabbi Yehoshua regarding Lo'erev al tanach yodecha would not be considered a sinner. And although Beth Din could force someone to get married even if he did not want to, Beth Din would not force one to observe this mitzvah of having more children than the minimal two. This principle of Rabbi Yeshoshua is a statement of the proper mode of behavior (derech eretz) rather than an official rabbinic enachnent (takkanah).
So we all agree, it's either a mitzvah minhatorah or just something nice to do or possibly somewhere inbetween ;)
– Josh K
7 hours ago
It would be worthwhile to pursue the change in language. The 1st half of the posuk from Kohelet is clearly referring to reproduction. But what is the meaning of "ידך"? Why is that taken to mean 'continue to have children'? And why is it stated in the language of a prohibition, while the 1st half of the posuk is a positive command?
– Yaacov Deane
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
To quote part of R. Hershel Schachter's article on the topic:
It is now several years into their marriage, and our couple has already been blessed with a son and a daughter. What now? The Talmud tells us in the name of Rabbi Yehoshua that even after one has fulfilled the biblical obligation of Pru U'rvu, he is still required to continue to have children in his later years. This idea is derived from the words of Koheles (11:6) בבוקר זרע את זרעך ולערב אל תנח ידך, v'loerev al tanach Yodecho - 'In the morning you should plant your seed and in the evening, as well, you should continue to do the same." The consensus among the Poskim is that this law of Rabbi Yehoshua is not biblical in nature, but only rabbinic.
According to the Aruch HaShulchon, the Rambam's view is that לערב אל תנח ידך does not constitute an independent rabbinic mitzvah, but is rather a Hiddur Mitzvah Min Hamuvchar (a very desirable enhancement) of Piryah V'rivyah. Hence it follows, as the Ramban has pointed out, that although one who violates any rabbinic law is considered wicked (a Rosho) and may be referred to by other people as such, one who refuses to observe this ruling of Rabbi Yehoshua regarding Lo'erev al tanach yodecha would not be considered a sinner. And although Beth Din could force someone to get married even if he did not want to, Beth Din would not force one to observe this mitzvah of having more children than the minimal two. This principle of Rabbi Yeshoshua is a statement of the proper mode of behavior (derech eretz) rather than an official rabbinic enachnent (takkanah).
So we all agree, it's either a mitzvah minhatorah or just something nice to do or possibly somewhere inbetween ;)
– Josh K
7 hours ago
It would be worthwhile to pursue the change in language. The 1st half of the posuk from Kohelet is clearly referring to reproduction. But what is the meaning of "ידך"? Why is that taken to mean 'continue to have children'? And why is it stated in the language of a prohibition, while the 1st half of the posuk is a positive command?
– Yaacov Deane
1 hour ago
add a comment |
To quote part of R. Hershel Schachter's article on the topic:
It is now several years into their marriage, and our couple has already been blessed with a son and a daughter. What now? The Talmud tells us in the name of Rabbi Yehoshua that even after one has fulfilled the biblical obligation of Pru U'rvu, he is still required to continue to have children in his later years. This idea is derived from the words of Koheles (11:6) בבוקר זרע את זרעך ולערב אל תנח ידך, v'loerev al tanach Yodecho - 'In the morning you should plant your seed and in the evening, as well, you should continue to do the same." The consensus among the Poskim is that this law of Rabbi Yehoshua is not biblical in nature, but only rabbinic.
According to the Aruch HaShulchon, the Rambam's view is that לערב אל תנח ידך does not constitute an independent rabbinic mitzvah, but is rather a Hiddur Mitzvah Min Hamuvchar (a very desirable enhancement) of Piryah V'rivyah. Hence it follows, as the Ramban has pointed out, that although one who violates any rabbinic law is considered wicked (a Rosho) and may be referred to by other people as such, one who refuses to observe this ruling of Rabbi Yehoshua regarding Lo'erev al tanach yodecha would not be considered a sinner. And although Beth Din could force someone to get married even if he did not want to, Beth Din would not force one to observe this mitzvah of having more children than the minimal two. This principle of Rabbi Yeshoshua is a statement of the proper mode of behavior (derech eretz) rather than an official rabbinic enachnent (takkanah).
So we all agree, it's either a mitzvah minhatorah or just something nice to do or possibly somewhere inbetween ;)
– Josh K
7 hours ago
It would be worthwhile to pursue the change in language. The 1st half of the posuk from Kohelet is clearly referring to reproduction. But what is the meaning of "ידך"? Why is that taken to mean 'continue to have children'? And why is it stated in the language of a prohibition, while the 1st half of the posuk is a positive command?
– Yaacov Deane
1 hour ago
add a comment |
To quote part of R. Hershel Schachter's article on the topic:
It is now several years into their marriage, and our couple has already been blessed with a son and a daughter. What now? The Talmud tells us in the name of Rabbi Yehoshua that even after one has fulfilled the biblical obligation of Pru U'rvu, he is still required to continue to have children in his later years. This idea is derived from the words of Koheles (11:6) בבוקר זרע את זרעך ולערב אל תנח ידך, v'loerev al tanach Yodecho - 'In the morning you should plant your seed and in the evening, as well, you should continue to do the same." The consensus among the Poskim is that this law of Rabbi Yehoshua is not biblical in nature, but only rabbinic.
According to the Aruch HaShulchon, the Rambam's view is that לערב אל תנח ידך does not constitute an independent rabbinic mitzvah, but is rather a Hiddur Mitzvah Min Hamuvchar (a very desirable enhancement) of Piryah V'rivyah. Hence it follows, as the Ramban has pointed out, that although one who violates any rabbinic law is considered wicked (a Rosho) and may be referred to by other people as such, one who refuses to observe this ruling of Rabbi Yehoshua regarding Lo'erev al tanach yodecha would not be considered a sinner. And although Beth Din could force someone to get married even if he did not want to, Beth Din would not force one to observe this mitzvah of having more children than the minimal two. This principle of Rabbi Yeshoshua is a statement of the proper mode of behavior (derech eretz) rather than an official rabbinic enachnent (takkanah).
To quote part of R. Hershel Schachter's article on the topic:
It is now several years into their marriage, and our couple has already been blessed with a son and a daughter. What now? The Talmud tells us in the name of Rabbi Yehoshua that even after one has fulfilled the biblical obligation of Pru U'rvu, he is still required to continue to have children in his later years. This idea is derived from the words of Koheles (11:6) בבוקר זרע את זרעך ולערב אל תנח ידך, v'loerev al tanach Yodecho - 'In the morning you should plant your seed and in the evening, as well, you should continue to do the same." The consensus among the Poskim is that this law of Rabbi Yehoshua is not biblical in nature, but only rabbinic.
According to the Aruch HaShulchon, the Rambam's view is that לערב אל תנח ידך does not constitute an independent rabbinic mitzvah, but is rather a Hiddur Mitzvah Min Hamuvchar (a very desirable enhancement) of Piryah V'rivyah. Hence it follows, as the Ramban has pointed out, that although one who violates any rabbinic law is considered wicked (a Rosho) and may be referred to by other people as such, one who refuses to observe this ruling of Rabbi Yehoshua regarding Lo'erev al tanach yodecha would not be considered a sinner. And although Beth Din could force someone to get married even if he did not want to, Beth Din would not force one to observe this mitzvah of having more children than the minimal two. This principle of Rabbi Yeshoshua is a statement of the proper mode of behavior (derech eretz) rather than an official rabbinic enachnent (takkanah).
answered 8 hours ago
Joel KJoel K
19.2k2 gold badges34 silver badges111 bronze badges
19.2k2 gold badges34 silver badges111 bronze badges
So we all agree, it's either a mitzvah minhatorah or just something nice to do or possibly somewhere inbetween ;)
– Josh K
7 hours ago
It would be worthwhile to pursue the change in language. The 1st half of the posuk from Kohelet is clearly referring to reproduction. But what is the meaning of "ידך"? Why is that taken to mean 'continue to have children'? And why is it stated in the language of a prohibition, while the 1st half of the posuk is a positive command?
– Yaacov Deane
1 hour ago
add a comment |
So we all agree, it's either a mitzvah minhatorah or just something nice to do or possibly somewhere inbetween ;)
– Josh K
7 hours ago
It would be worthwhile to pursue the change in language. The 1st half of the posuk from Kohelet is clearly referring to reproduction. But what is the meaning of "ידך"? Why is that taken to mean 'continue to have children'? And why is it stated in the language of a prohibition, while the 1st half of the posuk is a positive command?
– Yaacov Deane
1 hour ago
So we all agree, it's either a mitzvah minhatorah or just something nice to do or possibly somewhere inbetween ;)
– Josh K
7 hours ago
So we all agree, it's either a mitzvah minhatorah or just something nice to do or possibly somewhere inbetween ;)
– Josh K
7 hours ago
It would be worthwhile to pursue the change in language. The 1st half of the posuk from Kohelet is clearly referring to reproduction. But what is the meaning of "ידך"? Why is that taken to mean 'continue to have children'? And why is it stated in the language of a prohibition, while the 1st half of the posuk is a positive command?
– Yaacov Deane
1 hour ago
It would be worthwhile to pursue the change in language. The 1st half of the posuk from Kohelet is clearly referring to reproduction. But what is the meaning of "ידך"? Why is that taken to mean 'continue to have children'? And why is it stated in the language of a prohibition, while the 1st half of the posuk is a positive command?
– Yaacov Deane
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2
related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/94001/170
– msh210♦
7 hours ago