Why does matter stays collapsed following the supernova explosion?Why is iron responsible for causing a supernova?Supernova explosion nearbySpeed of blast from supernovaWhat is faster than a supernova explosion?How to form Copper from Calcium in a supernova explosion?“Supernova” is the explosion or the resulting celestial body? Is it incorrect to call the explosion “supernova”?Are there observable changes in a star about to become supernova, minutes or hours before the explosion?Does a kilonova leave a high mass remnant?Is there a possibility that a white dwarf can turn into a neutron star or a black hole?

Adoption records in 1871 based on census info

Unlock your Lock

Is it legal for source code containing undefined behavior to crash the compiler?

Can Orcus use Multiattack with any melee weapon?

Why should a self-financing strategy be previsible?

How to prevent a hosting company from accessing a VM's encryption keys?

What is the meaning of “these lederhosen are riding up my Bundesliga”?

Count the number of paths to n

Breaker Mapping Questions

How to say "I only speak one which is English." in French?

Can RMSE and MAE have the same value?

Why is getting a PhD considered "financially irresponsible"?

Can an Arcane Focus be embedded in one's body?

Is it allowed to work ONLINE on F-1 visa?

What does it take for witness testimony to be believed?

I don't have the theoretical background in my PhD topic. I can't justify getting the degree

Billiard balls collision

Gambler coin problem: fair coin and two-headed coin

How can I download a file from a host I can only SSH to through another host?

Why does a sticker slowly peel off, but if it is pulled quickly it tears?

Is first Ubuntu user root?

How much does Commander Data weigh?

Given current technology, could TV display screens double as video camera sensors?

Bevel not matching the curve object source



Why does matter stays collapsed following the supernova explosion?


Why is iron responsible for causing a supernova?Supernova explosion nearbySpeed of blast from supernovaWhat is faster than a supernova explosion?How to form Copper from Calcium in a supernova explosion?“Supernova” is the explosion or the resulting celestial body? Is it incorrect to call the explosion “supernova”?Are there observable changes in a star about to become supernova, minutes or hours before the explosion?Does a kilonova leave a high mass remnant?Is there a possibility that a white dwarf can turn into a neutron star or a black hole?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


Following a supernova explosion a star will turn into a white dwarf, neutron star, black hole, or just a stellar dust & gas leftover.



Excluding the latter case, why and how does matter stays collapsed, after such an event where matter is burst and scattered in space?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Riccardo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The answer is gravity. White dwarfs are not a possible product of supernovae.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Jeffries
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It's the other way. The collapse comes first anf the explosion afterwards. Basically the core of the stay collapses and the outer part falls in to fill the void, gets very hot (partlyu as a result of energy radiated by the collapsing core and partly from its own fall) and fuses explosively.
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Linton
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Steve, this is what the question is about. Following the explosion a neutron star or black whole may be left in place. Why does the matter left after the explosion stays collapsed in so dense objects? maybe the nova explosion expels only some part of the collapsing star?
    $endgroup$
    – Riccardo
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uhoh I meant dust & gas
    $endgroup$
    – Riccardo
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @riccardo exactly so. The explosion happens around the collapsed core of the star, blowing the outer layers outwards, but leaving the core, in some cases intact
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Linton
    4 hours ago

















3












$begingroup$


Following a supernova explosion a star will turn into a white dwarf, neutron star, black hole, or just a stellar dust & gas leftover.



Excluding the latter case, why and how does matter stays collapsed, after such an event where matter is burst and scattered in space?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Riccardo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The answer is gravity. White dwarfs are not a possible product of supernovae.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Jeffries
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It's the other way. The collapse comes first anf the explosion afterwards. Basically the core of the stay collapses and the outer part falls in to fill the void, gets very hot (partlyu as a result of energy radiated by the collapsing core and partly from its own fall) and fuses explosively.
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Linton
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Steve, this is what the question is about. Following the explosion a neutron star or black whole may be left in place. Why does the matter left after the explosion stays collapsed in so dense objects? maybe the nova explosion expels only some part of the collapsing star?
    $endgroup$
    – Riccardo
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uhoh I meant dust & gas
    $endgroup$
    – Riccardo
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @riccardo exactly so. The explosion happens around the collapsed core of the star, blowing the outer layers outwards, but leaving the core, in some cases intact
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Linton
    4 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$


Following a supernova explosion a star will turn into a white dwarf, neutron star, black hole, or just a stellar dust & gas leftover.



Excluding the latter case, why and how does matter stays collapsed, after such an event where matter is burst and scattered in space?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Riccardo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




Following a supernova explosion a star will turn into a white dwarf, neutron star, black hole, or just a stellar dust & gas leftover.



Excluding the latter case, why and how does matter stays collapsed, after such an event where matter is burst and scattered in space?







supernova explosion






share|improve this question









New contributor



Riccardo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Riccardo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago







Riccardo













New contributor



Riccardo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 9 hours ago









RiccardoRiccardo

1363 bronze badges




1363 bronze badges




New contributor



Riccardo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Riccardo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • $begingroup$
    The answer is gravity. White dwarfs are not a possible product of supernovae.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Jeffries
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It's the other way. The collapse comes first anf the explosion afterwards. Basically the core of the stay collapses and the outer part falls in to fill the void, gets very hot (partlyu as a result of energy radiated by the collapsing core and partly from its own fall) and fuses explosively.
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Linton
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Steve, this is what the question is about. Following the explosion a neutron star or black whole may be left in place. Why does the matter left after the explosion stays collapsed in so dense objects? maybe the nova explosion expels only some part of the collapsing star?
    $endgroup$
    – Riccardo
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uhoh I meant dust & gas
    $endgroup$
    – Riccardo
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @riccardo exactly so. The explosion happens around the collapsed core of the star, blowing the outer layers outwards, but leaving the core, in some cases intact
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Linton
    4 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    The answer is gravity. White dwarfs are not a possible product of supernovae.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Jeffries
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It's the other way. The collapse comes first anf the explosion afterwards. Basically the core of the stay collapses and the outer part falls in to fill the void, gets very hot (partlyu as a result of energy radiated by the collapsing core and partly from its own fall) and fuses explosively.
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Linton
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Steve, this is what the question is about. Following the explosion a neutron star or black whole may be left in place. Why does the matter left after the explosion stays collapsed in so dense objects? maybe the nova explosion expels only some part of the collapsing star?
    $endgroup$
    – Riccardo
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uhoh I meant dust & gas
    $endgroup$
    – Riccardo
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @riccardo exactly so. The explosion happens around the collapsed core of the star, blowing the outer layers outwards, but leaving the core, in some cases intact
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Linton
    4 hours ago















$begingroup$
The answer is gravity. White dwarfs are not a possible product of supernovae.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
The answer is gravity. White dwarfs are not a possible product of supernovae.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
It's the other way. The collapse comes first anf the explosion afterwards. Basically the core of the stay collapses and the outer part falls in to fill the void, gets very hot (partlyu as a result of energy radiated by the collapsing core and partly from its own fall) and fuses explosively.
$endgroup$
– Steve Linton
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
It's the other way. The collapse comes first anf the explosion afterwards. Basically the core of the stay collapses and the outer part falls in to fill the void, gets very hot (partlyu as a result of energy radiated by the collapsing core and partly from its own fall) and fuses explosively.
$endgroup$
– Steve Linton
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
Steve, this is what the question is about. Following the explosion a neutron star or black whole may be left in place. Why does the matter left after the explosion stays collapsed in so dense objects? maybe the nova explosion expels only some part of the collapsing star?
$endgroup$
– Riccardo
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Steve, this is what the question is about. Following the explosion a neutron star or black whole may be left in place. Why does the matter left after the explosion stays collapsed in so dense objects? maybe the nova explosion expels only some part of the collapsing star?
$endgroup$
– Riccardo
8 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@uhoh I meant dust & gas
$endgroup$
– Riccardo
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@uhoh I meant dust & gas
$endgroup$
– Riccardo
4 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
@riccardo exactly so. The explosion happens around the collapsed core of the star, blowing the outer layers outwards, but leaving the core, in some cases intact
$endgroup$
– Steve Linton
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@riccardo exactly so. The explosion happens around the collapsed core of the star, blowing the outer layers outwards, but leaving the core, in some cases intact
$endgroup$
– Steve Linton
4 hours ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















2













$begingroup$

Found the answer on NASA site




The collapse happens so quickly that it creates enormous shock waves that cause the outer part of the star to explode!




This means the core survives the blast somehow






share|improve this answer








New contributor



Riccardo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





$endgroup$






















    1













    $begingroup$

    In a star, there are two opposing forces which usually balance each other Gravity is a force which induces collapse, while radiation pressure from the fusion reactions within resists the tendency to collapse. Small, sun-like stars, when they have used up most of their hydrogen fuel, will start "burning" helium and become red giants. When the helium runs out they will puff off their outer layers in a nova and collapse to form a white dwarf about the size of Earth. These white dwarfs are amazingly dense and heavy, because most of the mass of the original star has been compressed into a comparatively tiny volume. Further collapse is resisted by a force called electron degeneracy pressure.



    Stars much larger than the sun will go on fusing elements beyond helium, building up layers of successively heavier elements until they reach iron. Fusion of elements beyond iron requires an input of energy rather than producing any, and the nuclear fires go out, so deprived of support from radiation pressure the outer layers of the star collapse, producing a supernova explosion. Electron degeneracy pressure is not enough to prevent a more drastic collapse than occurs with much smaller stars. According to the mass of the collapsing star, this will either result in the formation of a neutron star, which is like a gigantic atomic nucleus of incredible density about 6 miles across but containing a mass equivalent to several of our suns, or it will collapse further to form a black hole singularity in which matter enters a state not fully understood by science. Our sun, by the way, is 860,000 miles in diameter..






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      This doesn't address the question at all.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob Jeffries
      46 mins ago











    • $begingroup$
      Matter stays collapsed because of the immense gravitational fields these supernovae remnants have. I'd have thought that was obvious.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Walsby
      12 mins ago


















    1













    $begingroup$

    In order to "blow something up" you need to release more energy than its binding energy and have a way of trapping that energy so it can't escape in another way.



    At the centre of a core collapse supernovae is a 10 km radius, $1.4 M_odot$ ball of (almost) neutrons.
    Its gravitational binding energy is $sim GM^2/R = 5times 10^46$ J.



    This is almost exactly how much energy is released by the collapse of the core from a much larger size, and since some of that energy goes into dissociating iron nuclei and making neutrons (both endothermic processes) and most of the rest escapes in the form of neutrinos, then there isn't enough energy to unbind the core. A tiny fraction (1%) is transferred to the envelope of the original star, which is enough to overcome its gravitational binding energy.



    The case of a type Ia supernova (an exploding white dwarf) is quite different. Here the energy comes from a thermonuclear detonation of all the carbon and oxygen that make up the white dwarf, to form iron peak elements. This exothermic process releases enough energy to unbind the original star and it is completely destroyed.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$






















      0













      $begingroup$

      After a supernova explosion, the event might leave a compact object as a neutron star or a blackhole. The object can still accrete materials such as from fall back accretion or its companion star. If the object is a neutron star, it might further collapse into a blackhole.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$














      • $begingroup$
        That's the question ! How can the core survive such an explosion that will scatter matter over 11 light years? That's the size of the Crab Nebula....
        $endgroup$
        – Riccardo
        4 hours ago











      • $begingroup$
        I think the point of the original question is how this happens, not that it does.
        $endgroup$
        – Carl Witthoft
        2 hours ago


















      0













      $begingroup$

      What's missing from the above explanations is what is really going on that causes any kind of explosion at all.



      I'm going to steal from xkcd to help with this:



      https://what-if.xkcd.com/73/



      Ultimately, when the star is in it's dying moments, it starts emitting neutrinos. A lot of neutrinos... with a lot of energy. Now, I'm sure you're thinking "what would that do... they don't weigh much of anything". But this is literally like being buried in a football stadium with ants... there are so many neutrinos packing so much energy that they literally cause the outer matter of the star to be blown outwards with large enough energy to carry it away from the gravity well of the remaining matter.



      Ah... but how does any matter remain? Because close to the center, the gravity well is deepest, and also close to the center any particle (nucleus/neutron) is being bombarded just about equally in all directions by neutrinos... so the total momentum effectively cancels to zero. Some of the matter is moved a bit... but falls back into the very deep gravity well.



      I'm sure it would be a sight to behold... for that brief moment before you were vaporized by neutrinos (and all the other energy) at least.





      share









      $endgroup$

















        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "514"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        Riccardo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33148%2fwhy-does-matter-stays-collapsed-following-the-supernova-explosion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        2













        $begingroup$

        Found the answer on NASA site




        The collapse happens so quickly that it creates enormous shock waves that cause the outer part of the star to explode!




        This means the core survives the blast somehow






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor



        Riccardo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        $endgroup$



















          2













          $begingroup$

          Found the answer on NASA site




          The collapse happens so quickly that it creates enormous shock waves that cause the outer part of the star to explode!




          This means the core survives the blast somehow






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor



          Riccardo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          $endgroup$

















            2














            2










            2







            $begingroup$

            Found the answer on NASA site




            The collapse happens so quickly that it creates enormous shock waves that cause the outer part of the star to explode!




            This means the core survives the blast somehow






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor



            Riccardo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            $endgroup$



            Found the answer on NASA site




            The collapse happens so quickly that it creates enormous shock waves that cause the outer part of the star to explode!




            This means the core survives the blast somehow







            share|improve this answer








            New contributor



            Riccardo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer






            New contributor



            Riccardo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            answered 4 hours ago









            RiccardoRiccardo

            1363 bronze badges




            1363 bronze badges




            New contributor



            Riccardo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.




            New contributor




            Riccardo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.




























                1













                $begingroup$

                In a star, there are two opposing forces which usually balance each other Gravity is a force which induces collapse, while radiation pressure from the fusion reactions within resists the tendency to collapse. Small, sun-like stars, when they have used up most of their hydrogen fuel, will start "burning" helium and become red giants. When the helium runs out they will puff off their outer layers in a nova and collapse to form a white dwarf about the size of Earth. These white dwarfs are amazingly dense and heavy, because most of the mass of the original star has been compressed into a comparatively tiny volume. Further collapse is resisted by a force called electron degeneracy pressure.



                Stars much larger than the sun will go on fusing elements beyond helium, building up layers of successively heavier elements until they reach iron. Fusion of elements beyond iron requires an input of energy rather than producing any, and the nuclear fires go out, so deprived of support from radiation pressure the outer layers of the star collapse, producing a supernova explosion. Electron degeneracy pressure is not enough to prevent a more drastic collapse than occurs with much smaller stars. According to the mass of the collapsing star, this will either result in the formation of a neutron star, which is like a gigantic atomic nucleus of incredible density about 6 miles across but containing a mass equivalent to several of our suns, or it will collapse further to form a black hole singularity in which matter enters a state not fully understood by science. Our sun, by the way, is 860,000 miles in diameter..






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$














                • $begingroup$
                  This doesn't address the question at all.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Rob Jeffries
                  46 mins ago











                • $begingroup$
                  Matter stays collapsed because of the immense gravitational fields these supernovae remnants have. I'd have thought that was obvious.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Michael Walsby
                  12 mins ago















                1













                $begingroup$

                In a star, there are two opposing forces which usually balance each other Gravity is a force which induces collapse, while radiation pressure from the fusion reactions within resists the tendency to collapse. Small, sun-like stars, when they have used up most of their hydrogen fuel, will start "burning" helium and become red giants. When the helium runs out they will puff off their outer layers in a nova and collapse to form a white dwarf about the size of Earth. These white dwarfs are amazingly dense and heavy, because most of the mass of the original star has been compressed into a comparatively tiny volume. Further collapse is resisted by a force called electron degeneracy pressure.



                Stars much larger than the sun will go on fusing elements beyond helium, building up layers of successively heavier elements until they reach iron. Fusion of elements beyond iron requires an input of energy rather than producing any, and the nuclear fires go out, so deprived of support from radiation pressure the outer layers of the star collapse, producing a supernova explosion. Electron degeneracy pressure is not enough to prevent a more drastic collapse than occurs with much smaller stars. According to the mass of the collapsing star, this will either result in the formation of a neutron star, which is like a gigantic atomic nucleus of incredible density about 6 miles across but containing a mass equivalent to several of our suns, or it will collapse further to form a black hole singularity in which matter enters a state not fully understood by science. Our sun, by the way, is 860,000 miles in diameter..






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$














                • $begingroup$
                  This doesn't address the question at all.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Rob Jeffries
                  46 mins ago











                • $begingroup$
                  Matter stays collapsed because of the immense gravitational fields these supernovae remnants have. I'd have thought that was obvious.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Michael Walsby
                  12 mins ago













                1














                1










                1







                $begingroup$

                In a star, there are two opposing forces which usually balance each other Gravity is a force which induces collapse, while radiation pressure from the fusion reactions within resists the tendency to collapse. Small, sun-like stars, when they have used up most of their hydrogen fuel, will start "burning" helium and become red giants. When the helium runs out they will puff off their outer layers in a nova and collapse to form a white dwarf about the size of Earth. These white dwarfs are amazingly dense and heavy, because most of the mass of the original star has been compressed into a comparatively tiny volume. Further collapse is resisted by a force called electron degeneracy pressure.



                Stars much larger than the sun will go on fusing elements beyond helium, building up layers of successively heavier elements until they reach iron. Fusion of elements beyond iron requires an input of energy rather than producing any, and the nuclear fires go out, so deprived of support from radiation pressure the outer layers of the star collapse, producing a supernova explosion. Electron degeneracy pressure is not enough to prevent a more drastic collapse than occurs with much smaller stars. According to the mass of the collapsing star, this will either result in the formation of a neutron star, which is like a gigantic atomic nucleus of incredible density about 6 miles across but containing a mass equivalent to several of our suns, or it will collapse further to form a black hole singularity in which matter enters a state not fully understood by science. Our sun, by the way, is 860,000 miles in diameter..






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                In a star, there are two opposing forces which usually balance each other Gravity is a force which induces collapse, while radiation pressure from the fusion reactions within resists the tendency to collapse. Small, sun-like stars, when they have used up most of their hydrogen fuel, will start "burning" helium and become red giants. When the helium runs out they will puff off their outer layers in a nova and collapse to form a white dwarf about the size of Earth. These white dwarfs are amazingly dense and heavy, because most of the mass of the original star has been compressed into a comparatively tiny volume. Further collapse is resisted by a force called electron degeneracy pressure.



                Stars much larger than the sun will go on fusing elements beyond helium, building up layers of successively heavier elements until they reach iron. Fusion of elements beyond iron requires an input of energy rather than producing any, and the nuclear fires go out, so deprived of support from radiation pressure the outer layers of the star collapse, producing a supernova explosion. Electron degeneracy pressure is not enough to prevent a more drastic collapse than occurs with much smaller stars. According to the mass of the collapsing star, this will either result in the formation of a neutron star, which is like a gigantic atomic nucleus of incredible density about 6 miles across but containing a mass equivalent to several of our suns, or it will collapse further to form a black hole singularity in which matter enters a state not fully understood by science. Our sun, by the way, is 860,000 miles in diameter..







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 8 hours ago









                Michael WalsbyMichael Walsby

                9471 silver badge6 bronze badges




                9471 silver badge6 bronze badges














                • $begingroup$
                  This doesn't address the question at all.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Rob Jeffries
                  46 mins ago











                • $begingroup$
                  Matter stays collapsed because of the immense gravitational fields these supernovae remnants have. I'd have thought that was obvious.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Michael Walsby
                  12 mins ago
















                • $begingroup$
                  This doesn't address the question at all.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Rob Jeffries
                  46 mins ago











                • $begingroup$
                  Matter stays collapsed because of the immense gravitational fields these supernovae remnants have. I'd have thought that was obvious.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Michael Walsby
                  12 mins ago















                $begingroup$
                This doesn't address the question at all.
                $endgroup$
                – Rob Jeffries
                46 mins ago





                $begingroup$
                This doesn't address the question at all.
                $endgroup$
                – Rob Jeffries
                46 mins ago













                $begingroup$
                Matter stays collapsed because of the immense gravitational fields these supernovae remnants have. I'd have thought that was obvious.
                $endgroup$
                – Michael Walsby
                12 mins ago




                $begingroup$
                Matter stays collapsed because of the immense gravitational fields these supernovae remnants have. I'd have thought that was obvious.
                $endgroup$
                – Michael Walsby
                12 mins ago











                1













                $begingroup$

                In order to "blow something up" you need to release more energy than its binding energy and have a way of trapping that energy so it can't escape in another way.



                At the centre of a core collapse supernovae is a 10 km radius, $1.4 M_odot$ ball of (almost) neutrons.
                Its gravitational binding energy is $sim GM^2/R = 5times 10^46$ J.



                This is almost exactly how much energy is released by the collapse of the core from a much larger size, and since some of that energy goes into dissociating iron nuclei and making neutrons (both endothermic processes) and most of the rest escapes in the form of neutrinos, then there isn't enough energy to unbind the core. A tiny fraction (1%) is transferred to the envelope of the original star, which is enough to overcome its gravitational binding energy.



                The case of a type Ia supernova (an exploding white dwarf) is quite different. Here the energy comes from a thermonuclear detonation of all the carbon and oxygen that make up the white dwarf, to form iron peak elements. This exothermic process releases enough energy to unbind the original star and it is completely destroyed.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



















                  1













                  $begingroup$

                  In order to "blow something up" you need to release more energy than its binding energy and have a way of trapping that energy so it can't escape in another way.



                  At the centre of a core collapse supernovae is a 10 km radius, $1.4 M_odot$ ball of (almost) neutrons.
                  Its gravitational binding energy is $sim GM^2/R = 5times 10^46$ J.



                  This is almost exactly how much energy is released by the collapse of the core from a much larger size, and since some of that energy goes into dissociating iron nuclei and making neutrons (both endothermic processes) and most of the rest escapes in the form of neutrinos, then there isn't enough energy to unbind the core. A tiny fraction (1%) is transferred to the envelope of the original star, which is enough to overcome its gravitational binding energy.



                  The case of a type Ia supernova (an exploding white dwarf) is quite different. Here the energy comes from a thermonuclear detonation of all the carbon and oxygen that make up the white dwarf, to form iron peak elements. This exothermic process releases enough energy to unbind the original star and it is completely destroyed.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$

















                    1














                    1










                    1







                    $begingroup$

                    In order to "blow something up" you need to release more energy than its binding energy and have a way of trapping that energy so it can't escape in another way.



                    At the centre of a core collapse supernovae is a 10 km radius, $1.4 M_odot$ ball of (almost) neutrons.
                    Its gravitational binding energy is $sim GM^2/R = 5times 10^46$ J.



                    This is almost exactly how much energy is released by the collapse of the core from a much larger size, and since some of that energy goes into dissociating iron nuclei and making neutrons (both endothermic processes) and most of the rest escapes in the form of neutrinos, then there isn't enough energy to unbind the core. A tiny fraction (1%) is transferred to the envelope of the original star, which is enough to overcome its gravitational binding energy.



                    The case of a type Ia supernova (an exploding white dwarf) is quite different. Here the energy comes from a thermonuclear detonation of all the carbon and oxygen that make up the white dwarf, to form iron peak elements. This exothermic process releases enough energy to unbind the original star and it is completely destroyed.






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    In order to "blow something up" you need to release more energy than its binding energy and have a way of trapping that energy so it can't escape in another way.



                    At the centre of a core collapse supernovae is a 10 km radius, $1.4 M_odot$ ball of (almost) neutrons.
                    Its gravitational binding energy is $sim GM^2/R = 5times 10^46$ J.



                    This is almost exactly how much energy is released by the collapse of the core from a much larger size, and since some of that energy goes into dissociating iron nuclei and making neutrons (both endothermic processes) and most of the rest escapes in the form of neutrinos, then there isn't enough energy to unbind the core. A tiny fraction (1%) is transferred to the envelope of the original star, which is enough to overcome its gravitational binding energy.



                    The case of a type Ia supernova (an exploding white dwarf) is quite different. Here the energy comes from a thermonuclear detonation of all the carbon and oxygen that make up the white dwarf, to form iron peak elements. This exothermic process releases enough energy to unbind the original star and it is completely destroyed.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 37 mins ago

























                    answered 47 mins ago









                    Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries

                    58.9k4 gold badges122 silver badges193 bronze badges




                    58.9k4 gold badges122 silver badges193 bronze badges
























                        0













                        $begingroup$

                        After a supernova explosion, the event might leave a compact object as a neutron star or a blackhole. The object can still accrete materials such as from fall back accretion or its companion star. If the object is a neutron star, it might further collapse into a blackhole.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$














                        • $begingroup$
                          That's the question ! How can the core survive such an explosion that will scatter matter over 11 light years? That's the size of the Crab Nebula....
                          $endgroup$
                          – Riccardo
                          4 hours ago











                        • $begingroup$
                          I think the point of the original question is how this happens, not that it does.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Carl Witthoft
                          2 hours ago















                        0













                        $begingroup$

                        After a supernova explosion, the event might leave a compact object as a neutron star or a blackhole. The object can still accrete materials such as from fall back accretion or its companion star. If the object is a neutron star, it might further collapse into a blackhole.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$














                        • $begingroup$
                          That's the question ! How can the core survive such an explosion that will scatter matter over 11 light years? That's the size of the Crab Nebula....
                          $endgroup$
                          – Riccardo
                          4 hours ago











                        • $begingroup$
                          I think the point of the original question is how this happens, not that it does.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Carl Witthoft
                          2 hours ago













                        0














                        0










                        0







                        $begingroup$

                        After a supernova explosion, the event might leave a compact object as a neutron star or a blackhole. The object can still accrete materials such as from fall back accretion or its companion star. If the object is a neutron star, it might further collapse into a blackhole.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



                        After a supernova explosion, the event might leave a compact object as a neutron star or a blackhole. The object can still accrete materials such as from fall back accretion or its companion star. If the object is a neutron star, it might further collapse into a blackhole.







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered 4 hours ago









                        Kornpob BhirombhakdiKornpob Bhirombhakdi

                        1,1312 silver badges9 bronze badges




                        1,1312 silver badges9 bronze badges














                        • $begingroup$
                          That's the question ! How can the core survive such an explosion that will scatter matter over 11 light years? That's the size of the Crab Nebula....
                          $endgroup$
                          – Riccardo
                          4 hours ago











                        • $begingroup$
                          I think the point of the original question is how this happens, not that it does.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Carl Witthoft
                          2 hours ago
















                        • $begingroup$
                          That's the question ! How can the core survive such an explosion that will scatter matter over 11 light years? That's the size of the Crab Nebula....
                          $endgroup$
                          – Riccardo
                          4 hours ago











                        • $begingroup$
                          I think the point of the original question is how this happens, not that it does.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Carl Witthoft
                          2 hours ago















                        $begingroup$
                        That's the question ! How can the core survive such an explosion that will scatter matter over 11 light years? That's the size of the Crab Nebula....
                        $endgroup$
                        – Riccardo
                        4 hours ago





                        $begingroup$
                        That's the question ! How can the core survive such an explosion that will scatter matter over 11 light years? That's the size of the Crab Nebula....
                        $endgroup$
                        – Riccardo
                        4 hours ago













                        $begingroup$
                        I think the point of the original question is how this happens, not that it does.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Carl Witthoft
                        2 hours ago




                        $begingroup$
                        I think the point of the original question is how this happens, not that it does.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Carl Witthoft
                        2 hours ago











                        0













                        $begingroup$

                        What's missing from the above explanations is what is really going on that causes any kind of explosion at all.



                        I'm going to steal from xkcd to help with this:



                        https://what-if.xkcd.com/73/



                        Ultimately, when the star is in it's dying moments, it starts emitting neutrinos. A lot of neutrinos... with a lot of energy. Now, I'm sure you're thinking "what would that do... they don't weigh much of anything". But this is literally like being buried in a football stadium with ants... there are so many neutrinos packing so much energy that they literally cause the outer matter of the star to be blown outwards with large enough energy to carry it away from the gravity well of the remaining matter.



                        Ah... but how does any matter remain? Because close to the center, the gravity well is deepest, and also close to the center any particle (nucleus/neutron) is being bombarded just about equally in all directions by neutrinos... so the total momentum effectively cancels to zero. Some of the matter is moved a bit... but falls back into the very deep gravity well.



                        I'm sure it would be a sight to behold... for that brief moment before you were vaporized by neutrinos (and all the other energy) at least.





                        share









                        $endgroup$



















                          0













                          $begingroup$

                          What's missing from the above explanations is what is really going on that causes any kind of explosion at all.



                          I'm going to steal from xkcd to help with this:



                          https://what-if.xkcd.com/73/



                          Ultimately, when the star is in it's dying moments, it starts emitting neutrinos. A lot of neutrinos... with a lot of energy. Now, I'm sure you're thinking "what would that do... they don't weigh much of anything". But this is literally like being buried in a football stadium with ants... there are so many neutrinos packing so much energy that they literally cause the outer matter of the star to be blown outwards with large enough energy to carry it away from the gravity well of the remaining matter.



                          Ah... but how does any matter remain? Because close to the center, the gravity well is deepest, and also close to the center any particle (nucleus/neutron) is being bombarded just about equally in all directions by neutrinos... so the total momentum effectively cancels to zero. Some of the matter is moved a bit... but falls back into the very deep gravity well.



                          I'm sure it would be a sight to behold... for that brief moment before you were vaporized by neutrinos (and all the other energy) at least.





                          share









                          $endgroup$

















                            0














                            0










                            0







                            $begingroup$

                            What's missing from the above explanations is what is really going on that causes any kind of explosion at all.



                            I'm going to steal from xkcd to help with this:



                            https://what-if.xkcd.com/73/



                            Ultimately, when the star is in it's dying moments, it starts emitting neutrinos. A lot of neutrinos... with a lot of energy. Now, I'm sure you're thinking "what would that do... they don't weigh much of anything". But this is literally like being buried in a football stadium with ants... there are so many neutrinos packing so much energy that they literally cause the outer matter of the star to be blown outwards with large enough energy to carry it away from the gravity well of the remaining matter.



                            Ah... but how does any matter remain? Because close to the center, the gravity well is deepest, and also close to the center any particle (nucleus/neutron) is being bombarded just about equally in all directions by neutrinos... so the total momentum effectively cancels to zero. Some of the matter is moved a bit... but falls back into the very deep gravity well.



                            I'm sure it would be a sight to behold... for that brief moment before you were vaporized by neutrinos (and all the other energy) at least.





                            share









                            $endgroup$



                            What's missing from the above explanations is what is really going on that causes any kind of explosion at all.



                            I'm going to steal from xkcd to help with this:



                            https://what-if.xkcd.com/73/



                            Ultimately, when the star is in it's dying moments, it starts emitting neutrinos. A lot of neutrinos... with a lot of energy. Now, I'm sure you're thinking "what would that do... they don't weigh much of anything". But this is literally like being buried in a football stadium with ants... there are so many neutrinos packing so much energy that they literally cause the outer matter of the star to be blown outwards with large enough energy to carry it away from the gravity well of the remaining matter.



                            Ah... but how does any matter remain? Because close to the center, the gravity well is deepest, and also close to the center any particle (nucleus/neutron) is being bombarded just about equally in all directions by neutrinos... so the total momentum effectively cancels to zero. Some of the matter is moved a bit... but falls back into the very deep gravity well.



                            I'm sure it would be a sight to behold... for that brief moment before you were vaporized by neutrinos (and all the other energy) at least.






                            share











                            share


                            share










                            answered 7 mins ago









                            Reginald BlueReginald Blue

                            1243 bronze badges




                            1243 bronze badges























                                Riccardo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Riccardo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Riccardo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                Riccardo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Astronomy Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33148%2fwhy-does-matter-stays-collapsed-following-the-supernova-explosion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                                Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                                Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367