If two Lore Bards used the Cutting Words feature on an ability check or attack, would they stack?When a creature is hit with more than one fireball simultaneously, do they take damage from all of them?Can a Lore bard's Cutting Words feature cancel a critical hit?Does Cutting Words reduce the damage taken by every target of an AoE spell or attack?How can a DM deal with abilities that affect how an attack roll is resolved?When a creature is hit with more than one fireball simultaneously, do they take damage from all of them?What part of a multi-type damage roll is reduced by a non-type-specific effect?Can a Lore bard use Cutting Words against the attack roll/ability check of a sorcerer's Subtle spell?Can Sentinel at Death's Door and Cutting Words combine to make a critical hit miss?What happens when two opposing instances of Bend Luck are applied to the same roll by multiple Wild Magic sorcerers?Can either the Nondetection or Mind Blank spells prevent information about oneself being divined from others through the Legend Lore spell?

Rent contract say that pets are not allowed. Possible repercussions if bringing the pet anyway?

Does an atom recoil when photon radiate?

Notepad++ cannot print

How would a Creature that needs to be seen by Humans evolve?

Does this VCO produce a sine wave or square wave

Sum ergo cogito?

Papers on arXiv solving the same problem at the same time

If an earthquake can destroy buildings why it cant kill us according to physics?

Why doesn't 'd /= d' throw a division by zero exception?

How do the Etherealness and Banishment spells interact?

Can I add a link to my website in a paper I'm coauthoring?

Why are non-collision-resistant hash functions considered insecure for signing self-generated information

How do proponents of Sola Scriptura address the ministry of those Apostles who authored no parts of Scripture?

Can a Rogue PC teach an NPC to perform Sneak Attack?

Numbers Decrease while Letters Increase

Asymmetric table

Improving Performance of an XY Monte Carlo

Did anyone try to find the little box that held Professor Moriarty and his wife after the crash?

Visualizing a Probability Space in Wolfram w/Two Events?

Non-visual Computers - thoughts?

Lost property on Portuguese trains

Do Bayesian credible intervals treat the estimated parameter as a random variable?

Why is there a difference between predicting on Validation set and Test set?

Does Norwegian overbook flights?



If two Lore Bards used the Cutting Words feature on an ability check or attack, would they stack?


When a creature is hit with more than one fireball simultaneously, do they take damage from all of them?Can a Lore bard's Cutting Words feature cancel a critical hit?Does Cutting Words reduce the damage taken by every target of an AoE spell or attack?How can a DM deal with abilities that affect how an attack roll is resolved?When a creature is hit with more than one fireball simultaneously, do they take damage from all of them?What part of a multi-type damage roll is reduced by a non-type-specific effect?Can a Lore bard use Cutting Words against the attack roll/ability check of a sorcerer's Subtle spell?Can Sentinel at Death's Door and Cutting Words combine to make a critical hit miss?What happens when two opposing instances of Bend Luck are applied to the same roll by multiple Wild Magic sorcerers?Can either the Nondetection or Mind Blank spells prevent information about oneself being divined from others through the Legend Lore spell?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








9












$begingroup$


Let's say the party had two Lore Bards, and both used Cutting Words on a creature who tried to attack.



Does that stack, since they are separate penalties and not enduring effects (like bless)? Or would it still fall under the "same name features don't stack" rule?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




















    9












    $begingroup$


    Let's say the party had two Lore Bards, and both used Cutting Words on a creature who tried to attack.



    Does that stack, since they are separate penalties and not enduring effects (like bless)? Or would it still fall under the "same name features don't stack" rule?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$
















      9












      9








      9


      1



      $begingroup$


      Let's say the party had two Lore Bards, and both used Cutting Words on a creature who tried to attack.



      Does that stack, since they are separate penalties and not enduring effects (like bless)? Or would it still fall under the "same name features don't stack" rule?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let's say the party had two Lore Bards, and both used Cutting Words on a creature who tried to attack.



      Does that stack, since they are separate penalties and not enduring effects (like bless)? Or would it still fall under the "same name features don't stack" rule?







      dnd-5e class-feature bard stacking simultaneous-effects






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 25 mins ago









      V2Blast

      33.8k5 gold badges123 silver badges212 bronze badges




      33.8k5 gold badges123 silver badges212 bronze badges










      asked 11 hours ago









      CyanicCyanic

      6141 silver badge18 bronze badges




      6141 silver badge18 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5













          $begingroup$

          They would stack because they have no duration



          The rules on stacking/combining game effects states (page 252):




          [W]hen two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them — the most potent one — apply while the durations of the effects overlap




          I would argue that modifiers to rolls do not actually have a duration and so they cannot actually overlap, so the clause about stacking effects won't apply.



          This is similar to the answer to a similar question about simultaneous fireballs which argues that you would take damage twice because the spells (and their damage) are instantaneous effects without duration.



          Similarly the modifier of Cutting Words does not have any sort of persisting effect that you could call a duration, it simply happens.



          Because modifiers do not have a duration and nothing with a duration is causing the modifiers to occur (such as with the bless spell) two uses of Cutting Words can combine against a single attack.




          A small additional note:

          The actual applications of Cutting Words are not even happening at the same time. Though they would result from the same trigger the optional rules on simultaneous events from Xanathar's states:




          If two or more things happen at the same time on a character or monster's turn, the person at the game table-whether player or DM-who controls that creature decides the order in which those things happen. For example, if two effects occur at the end of a player character's turn, the player decides which of the two effects happens first.




          This means that the modifiers from Cutting Words would not actually get applied at the same time, it would be one and then the other. So even if instantaneous were a duration the use of this rule would make it so that those durations were not overlapping and thus the stacking effects rule would not apply.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            OOOOoooo.... that is something I didn't think about. Feels broken, but you might be technically correct ("the best kind of correct" - Futurama).
            $endgroup$
            – J. A. Streich
            9 hours ago



















          2













          $begingroup$

          Combining Effects



          No, the rule for Combining Game Effects says that s of the same name don't stack effects while they overlap.




          “Different game features can
          affect a target at the same time. But when two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them—the most potent one—apply while the durations of the effects overlap. For example, if a target is ignited by a fire elemental’s Fire Form trait, the ongoing fire damage doesn’t increase if the burning target is subjected to that trait again. Game features include spells,
          class features, feats, racial traits, monster abilities, and magic items. See the related rule in the ‘Combining Magical Effects’ section of chapter 10 in the Player’s Handbook.




          Similar to the fire example, Cutting Words reads:




          you learn how to use your wit to distract, confuse, and otherwise sap the confidence and competence of others.




          You shouldn't be able to become "more distracted and confused" on a single attack.



          But it is Instantaneous



          Now, Cutting Words doesn't have a duration, but in the case of cutting words they are happening at the same time, so they are clearly over lapping as they are both happening when the attack is happening (not just same round 6 seconds, but as the effect is landing). It would be hard to argue that they aren't happening at the same time as they are both reactions to the same split second action.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Think about this, what if you had two characters with the Warcaster feat. An enemy is adjacent to them and moves in a way that provokes an AoO from both of them at the same time. Both of them respond by casting the same damage spell (eg. inflict wounds) at it and both hit. Since both spells are hitting at the same time then, by your logic, only one of the spells does damage.
            $endgroup$
            – Allan Mills
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @allanmills I at least would use the Xanathar's simultaneous events optional rule. So they aren't actually hitting at the same time
            $endgroup$
            – Medix2
            7 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154105%2fif-two-lore-bards-used-the-cutting-words-feature-on-an-ability-check-or-attack%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5













          $begingroup$

          They would stack because they have no duration



          The rules on stacking/combining game effects states (page 252):




          [W]hen two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them — the most potent one — apply while the durations of the effects overlap




          I would argue that modifiers to rolls do not actually have a duration and so they cannot actually overlap, so the clause about stacking effects won't apply.



          This is similar to the answer to a similar question about simultaneous fireballs which argues that you would take damage twice because the spells (and their damage) are instantaneous effects without duration.



          Similarly the modifier of Cutting Words does not have any sort of persisting effect that you could call a duration, it simply happens.



          Because modifiers do not have a duration and nothing with a duration is causing the modifiers to occur (such as with the bless spell) two uses of Cutting Words can combine against a single attack.




          A small additional note:

          The actual applications of Cutting Words are not even happening at the same time. Though they would result from the same trigger the optional rules on simultaneous events from Xanathar's states:




          If two or more things happen at the same time on a character or monster's turn, the person at the game table-whether player or DM-who controls that creature decides the order in which those things happen. For example, if two effects occur at the end of a player character's turn, the player decides which of the two effects happens first.




          This means that the modifiers from Cutting Words would not actually get applied at the same time, it would be one and then the other. So even if instantaneous were a duration the use of this rule would make it so that those durations were not overlapping and thus the stacking effects rule would not apply.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            OOOOoooo.... that is something I didn't think about. Feels broken, but you might be technically correct ("the best kind of correct" - Futurama).
            $endgroup$
            – J. A. Streich
            9 hours ago
















          5













          $begingroup$

          They would stack because they have no duration



          The rules on stacking/combining game effects states (page 252):




          [W]hen two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them — the most potent one — apply while the durations of the effects overlap




          I would argue that modifiers to rolls do not actually have a duration and so they cannot actually overlap, so the clause about stacking effects won't apply.



          This is similar to the answer to a similar question about simultaneous fireballs which argues that you would take damage twice because the spells (and their damage) are instantaneous effects without duration.



          Similarly the modifier of Cutting Words does not have any sort of persisting effect that you could call a duration, it simply happens.



          Because modifiers do not have a duration and nothing with a duration is causing the modifiers to occur (such as with the bless spell) two uses of Cutting Words can combine against a single attack.




          A small additional note:

          The actual applications of Cutting Words are not even happening at the same time. Though they would result from the same trigger the optional rules on simultaneous events from Xanathar's states:




          If two or more things happen at the same time on a character or monster's turn, the person at the game table-whether player or DM-who controls that creature decides the order in which those things happen. For example, if two effects occur at the end of a player character's turn, the player decides which of the two effects happens first.




          This means that the modifiers from Cutting Words would not actually get applied at the same time, it would be one and then the other. So even if instantaneous were a duration the use of this rule would make it so that those durations were not overlapping and thus the stacking effects rule would not apply.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            OOOOoooo.... that is something I didn't think about. Feels broken, but you might be technically correct ("the best kind of correct" - Futurama).
            $endgroup$
            – J. A. Streich
            9 hours ago














          5














          5










          5







          $begingroup$

          They would stack because they have no duration



          The rules on stacking/combining game effects states (page 252):




          [W]hen two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them — the most potent one — apply while the durations of the effects overlap




          I would argue that modifiers to rolls do not actually have a duration and so they cannot actually overlap, so the clause about stacking effects won't apply.



          This is similar to the answer to a similar question about simultaneous fireballs which argues that you would take damage twice because the spells (and their damage) are instantaneous effects without duration.



          Similarly the modifier of Cutting Words does not have any sort of persisting effect that you could call a duration, it simply happens.



          Because modifiers do not have a duration and nothing with a duration is causing the modifiers to occur (such as with the bless spell) two uses of Cutting Words can combine against a single attack.




          A small additional note:

          The actual applications of Cutting Words are not even happening at the same time. Though they would result from the same trigger the optional rules on simultaneous events from Xanathar's states:




          If two or more things happen at the same time on a character or monster's turn, the person at the game table-whether player or DM-who controls that creature decides the order in which those things happen. For example, if two effects occur at the end of a player character's turn, the player decides which of the two effects happens first.




          This means that the modifiers from Cutting Words would not actually get applied at the same time, it would be one and then the other. So even if instantaneous were a duration the use of this rule would make it so that those durations were not overlapping and thus the stacking effects rule would not apply.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          They would stack because they have no duration



          The rules on stacking/combining game effects states (page 252):




          [W]hen two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them — the most potent one — apply while the durations of the effects overlap




          I would argue that modifiers to rolls do not actually have a duration and so they cannot actually overlap, so the clause about stacking effects won't apply.



          This is similar to the answer to a similar question about simultaneous fireballs which argues that you would take damage twice because the spells (and their damage) are instantaneous effects without duration.



          Similarly the modifier of Cutting Words does not have any sort of persisting effect that you could call a duration, it simply happens.



          Because modifiers do not have a duration and nothing with a duration is causing the modifiers to occur (such as with the bless spell) two uses of Cutting Words can combine against a single attack.




          A small additional note:

          The actual applications of Cutting Words are not even happening at the same time. Though they would result from the same trigger the optional rules on simultaneous events from Xanathar's states:




          If two or more things happen at the same time on a character or monster's turn, the person at the game table-whether player or DM-who controls that creature decides the order in which those things happen. For example, if two effects occur at the end of a player character's turn, the player decides which of the two effects happens first.




          This means that the modifiers from Cutting Words would not actually get applied at the same time, it would be one and then the other. So even if instantaneous were a duration the use of this rule would make it so that those durations were not overlapping and thus the stacking effects rule would not apply.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 7 hours ago

























          answered 10 hours ago









          Medix2Medix2

          7,4762 gold badges20 silver badges80 bronze badges




          7,4762 gold badges20 silver badges80 bronze badges










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            OOOOoooo.... that is something I didn't think about. Feels broken, but you might be technically correct ("the best kind of correct" - Futurama).
            $endgroup$
            – J. A. Streich
            9 hours ago













          • 1




            $begingroup$
            OOOOoooo.... that is something I didn't think about. Feels broken, but you might be technically correct ("the best kind of correct" - Futurama).
            $endgroup$
            – J. A. Streich
            9 hours ago








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          OOOOoooo.... that is something I didn't think about. Feels broken, but you might be technically correct ("the best kind of correct" - Futurama).
          $endgroup$
          – J. A. Streich
          9 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          OOOOoooo.... that is something I didn't think about. Feels broken, but you might be technically correct ("the best kind of correct" - Futurama).
          $endgroup$
          – J. A. Streich
          9 hours ago














          2













          $begingroup$

          Combining Effects



          No, the rule for Combining Game Effects says that s of the same name don't stack effects while they overlap.




          “Different game features can
          affect a target at the same time. But when two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them—the most potent one—apply while the durations of the effects overlap. For example, if a target is ignited by a fire elemental’s Fire Form trait, the ongoing fire damage doesn’t increase if the burning target is subjected to that trait again. Game features include spells,
          class features, feats, racial traits, monster abilities, and magic items. See the related rule in the ‘Combining Magical Effects’ section of chapter 10 in the Player’s Handbook.




          Similar to the fire example, Cutting Words reads:




          you learn how to use your wit to distract, confuse, and otherwise sap the confidence and competence of others.




          You shouldn't be able to become "more distracted and confused" on a single attack.



          But it is Instantaneous



          Now, Cutting Words doesn't have a duration, but in the case of cutting words they are happening at the same time, so they are clearly over lapping as they are both happening when the attack is happening (not just same round 6 seconds, but as the effect is landing). It would be hard to argue that they aren't happening at the same time as they are both reactions to the same split second action.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Think about this, what if you had two characters with the Warcaster feat. An enemy is adjacent to them and moves in a way that provokes an AoO from both of them at the same time. Both of them respond by casting the same damage spell (eg. inflict wounds) at it and both hit. Since both spells are hitting at the same time then, by your logic, only one of the spells does damage.
            $endgroup$
            – Allan Mills
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @allanmills I at least would use the Xanathar's simultaneous events optional rule. So they aren't actually hitting at the same time
            $endgroup$
            – Medix2
            7 hours ago















          2













          $begingroup$

          Combining Effects



          No, the rule for Combining Game Effects says that s of the same name don't stack effects while they overlap.




          “Different game features can
          affect a target at the same time. But when two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them—the most potent one—apply while the durations of the effects overlap. For example, if a target is ignited by a fire elemental’s Fire Form trait, the ongoing fire damage doesn’t increase if the burning target is subjected to that trait again. Game features include spells,
          class features, feats, racial traits, monster abilities, and magic items. See the related rule in the ‘Combining Magical Effects’ section of chapter 10 in the Player’s Handbook.




          Similar to the fire example, Cutting Words reads:




          you learn how to use your wit to distract, confuse, and otherwise sap the confidence and competence of others.




          You shouldn't be able to become "more distracted and confused" on a single attack.



          But it is Instantaneous



          Now, Cutting Words doesn't have a duration, but in the case of cutting words they are happening at the same time, so they are clearly over lapping as they are both happening when the attack is happening (not just same round 6 seconds, but as the effect is landing). It would be hard to argue that they aren't happening at the same time as they are both reactions to the same split second action.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Think about this, what if you had two characters with the Warcaster feat. An enemy is adjacent to them and moves in a way that provokes an AoO from both of them at the same time. Both of them respond by casting the same damage spell (eg. inflict wounds) at it and both hit. Since both spells are hitting at the same time then, by your logic, only one of the spells does damage.
            $endgroup$
            – Allan Mills
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @allanmills I at least would use the Xanathar's simultaneous events optional rule. So they aren't actually hitting at the same time
            $endgroup$
            – Medix2
            7 hours ago













          2














          2










          2







          $begingroup$

          Combining Effects



          No, the rule for Combining Game Effects says that s of the same name don't stack effects while they overlap.




          “Different game features can
          affect a target at the same time. But when two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them—the most potent one—apply while the durations of the effects overlap. For example, if a target is ignited by a fire elemental’s Fire Form trait, the ongoing fire damage doesn’t increase if the burning target is subjected to that trait again. Game features include spells,
          class features, feats, racial traits, monster abilities, and magic items. See the related rule in the ‘Combining Magical Effects’ section of chapter 10 in the Player’s Handbook.




          Similar to the fire example, Cutting Words reads:




          you learn how to use your wit to distract, confuse, and otherwise sap the confidence and competence of others.




          You shouldn't be able to become "more distracted and confused" on a single attack.



          But it is Instantaneous



          Now, Cutting Words doesn't have a duration, but in the case of cutting words they are happening at the same time, so they are clearly over lapping as they are both happening when the attack is happening (not just same round 6 seconds, but as the effect is landing). It would be hard to argue that they aren't happening at the same time as they are both reactions to the same split second action.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Combining Effects



          No, the rule for Combining Game Effects says that s of the same name don't stack effects while they overlap.




          “Different game features can
          affect a target at the same time. But when two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them—the most potent one—apply while the durations of the effects overlap. For example, if a target is ignited by a fire elemental’s Fire Form trait, the ongoing fire damage doesn’t increase if the burning target is subjected to that trait again. Game features include spells,
          class features, feats, racial traits, monster abilities, and magic items. See the related rule in the ‘Combining Magical Effects’ section of chapter 10 in the Player’s Handbook.




          Similar to the fire example, Cutting Words reads:




          you learn how to use your wit to distract, confuse, and otherwise sap the confidence and competence of others.




          You shouldn't be able to become "more distracted and confused" on a single attack.



          But it is Instantaneous



          Now, Cutting Words doesn't have a duration, but in the case of cutting words they are happening at the same time, so they are clearly over lapping as they are both happening when the attack is happening (not just same round 6 seconds, but as the effect is landing). It would be hard to argue that they aren't happening at the same time as they are both reactions to the same split second action.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 9 hours ago

























          answered 10 hours ago









          J. A. StreichJ. A. Streich

          28.8k2 gold badges83 silver badges142 bronze badges




          28.8k2 gold badges83 silver badges142 bronze badges














          • $begingroup$
            Think about this, what if you had two characters with the Warcaster feat. An enemy is adjacent to them and moves in a way that provokes an AoO from both of them at the same time. Both of them respond by casting the same damage spell (eg. inflict wounds) at it and both hit. Since both spells are hitting at the same time then, by your logic, only one of the spells does damage.
            $endgroup$
            – Allan Mills
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @allanmills I at least would use the Xanathar's simultaneous events optional rule. So they aren't actually hitting at the same time
            $endgroup$
            – Medix2
            7 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Think about this, what if you had two characters with the Warcaster feat. An enemy is adjacent to them and moves in a way that provokes an AoO from both of them at the same time. Both of them respond by casting the same damage spell (eg. inflict wounds) at it and both hit. Since both spells are hitting at the same time then, by your logic, only one of the spells does damage.
            $endgroup$
            – Allan Mills
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @allanmills I at least would use the Xanathar's simultaneous events optional rule. So they aren't actually hitting at the same time
            $endgroup$
            – Medix2
            7 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          Think about this, what if you had two characters with the Warcaster feat. An enemy is adjacent to them and moves in a way that provokes an AoO from both of them at the same time. Both of them respond by casting the same damage spell (eg. inflict wounds) at it and both hit. Since both spells are hitting at the same time then, by your logic, only one of the spells does damage.
          $endgroup$
          – Allan Mills
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Think about this, what if you had two characters with the Warcaster feat. An enemy is adjacent to them and moves in a way that provokes an AoO from both of them at the same time. Both of them respond by casting the same damage spell (eg. inflict wounds) at it and both hit. Since both spells are hitting at the same time then, by your logic, only one of the spells does damage.
          $endgroup$
          – Allan Mills
          7 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @allanmills I at least would use the Xanathar's simultaneous events optional rule. So they aren't actually hitting at the same time
          $endgroup$
          – Medix2
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @allanmills I at least would use the Xanathar's simultaneous events optional rule. So they aren't actually hitting at the same time
          $endgroup$
          – Medix2
          7 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154105%2fif-two-lore-bards-used-the-cutting-words-feature-on-an-ability-check-or-attack%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單