Did the Cheela on Dragon's Egg have twelve-stranded “DNA”?“There were either twelve sexes or none.”Did they ever deal with non-relativistic kinematics on Dragon's Egg?

Very slow boot time and poor perfomance

Why did Khan ask Admiral James T. Kirk about Project Genesis?

Rent contract say that pets are not allowed. Possible repercussions if bringing the pet anyway?

Asymmetric table

Add newline to prompt if it's too long

Uri tokenizer as a simple state machine

Heyacrazy: No Diagonals

Obtaining the intermediate solutions in AMPL

How can I unambiguously ask for a new user's "Display Name"?

Is gzip atomic?

Numbers Decrease while Letters Increase

What does zitch dog mean?

How to determine car loan length as a function of how long I plan to keep a car

Nothing like a good ol' game of ModTen

Improving Performance of an XY Monte Carlo

What would make bones be of different colors?

Papers on arXiv solving the same problem at the same time

Non-visual Computers - thoughts?

Can a Rogue PC teach an NPC to perform Sneak Attack?

Was there ever a treaty between 2 entities with significantly different translations to the detriment of one party?

Did the Cheela on Dragon's Egg have twelve-stranded "DNA"?

Prevent use of CNAME Record for Untrusted Domain

If two Lore Bards used cutting words on an ability check or attack, would they stack?

Round towards zero



Did the Cheela on Dragon's Egg have twelve-stranded “DNA”?


“There were either twelve sexes or none.”Did they ever deal with non-relativistic kinematics on Dragon's Egg?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















The answer to my question “There were either twelve sexes or none.” explains that there were actually either five sexes or none.



I remember being confused at the time how DNA (or similar genetic material) would work with multiple sexes, but where did the twelve come from?



Is it possible that in the intervening years I mixed it up with twelve-stranded DNA-like genetic material from the Cheela on Dragon's Egg?










share|improve this question
































    4















    The answer to my question “There were either twelve sexes or none.” explains that there were actually either five sexes or none.



    I remember being confused at the time how DNA (or similar genetic material) would work with multiple sexes, but where did the twelve come from?



    Is it possible that in the intervening years I mixed it up with twelve-stranded DNA-like genetic material from the Cheela on Dragon's Egg?










    share|improve this question




























      4












      4








      4








      The answer to my question “There were either twelve sexes or none.” explains that there were actually either five sexes or none.



      I remember being confused at the time how DNA (or similar genetic material) would work with multiple sexes, but where did the twelve come from?



      Is it possible that in the intervening years I mixed it up with twelve-stranded DNA-like genetic material from the Cheela on Dragon's Egg?










      share|improve this question
















      The answer to my question “There were either twelve sexes or none.” explains that there were actually either five sexes or none.



      I remember being confused at the time how DNA (or similar genetic material) would work with multiple sexes, but where did the twelve come from?



      Is it possible that in the intervening years I mixed it up with twelve-stranded DNA-like genetic material from the Cheela on Dragon's Egg?







      genetics dragons-egg






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 8 hours ago







      uhoh

















      asked 8 hours ago









      uhohuhoh

      2,34514 silver badges47 bronze badges




      2,34514 silver badges47 bronze badges























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3















          There is no mention of twelve-stranded DNA in the book.



          Cheela biology is described in some technical detail:




          The cheela biophysicists would not determine the genetic coding mechanism for the cheela for dozens of generations, but when they did, both they and the humans would be surprised at how different it was. Because of the high temperatures on the neutron star that attempted to disrupt everything into random chaos, and the all-pervasive magnetic field that lined everything up along the magnetic field lines, the cheela genetic structure was a triply-redundant linear strand of complex nuclear molecules. As the duplicating enzymes would copy the genetic molecule, the check at each triply redundant site provided an automatically correcting copying mechanism; if one of the three linear strands had mutated, the copying enzyme would be governed by majority rule, and the new triple strand would have the mutation corrected. If two mutations had occurred and all three sites were different, the enzyme would self-destruct, taking the faulty gene with it. It was only when the two mutations were the same that an error was able to creep
          through.




          I don't know enough biology to understand all this, but it seems to be three strands rather than twelve.



          On the other hand, the number twelve does show up a lot in more obvious parts of the cheela body. From the Technical Appendix:




          The cheela use a base 12 number system (they have twelve eyes) and their next unit of time after the turn is a great of turns or 144 turns. They occasionally use a dozen turns, but it has never had the same significance as the week does to humans. A great of turns is 28.7 seconds, while a human year is 31.6 million seconds. The ratio of a human year to a cheela great of turns is 1.1 million to one.



          From studying the history of the cheela we have learned that a cheela spends about 12 greats (six minutes) as a hatchling; 12 greats as a young apprentice, 30 greats (15 minutes) as a worker, 12 greats as an Old One tending eggs and hatchlings, then the rest of its life (maximum of 24 greats or 12 minutes) as an Aged One. All of these indications lead to the conclusion that the effective relative time scale between the cheela and humans is approximately one million to one.







          share|improve this answer

























          • okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.

            – uhoh
            8 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "186"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217966%2fdid-the-cheela-on-dragons-egg-have-twelve-stranded-dna%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3















          There is no mention of twelve-stranded DNA in the book.



          Cheela biology is described in some technical detail:




          The cheela biophysicists would not determine the genetic coding mechanism for the cheela for dozens of generations, but when they did, both they and the humans would be surprised at how different it was. Because of the high temperatures on the neutron star that attempted to disrupt everything into random chaos, and the all-pervasive magnetic field that lined everything up along the magnetic field lines, the cheela genetic structure was a triply-redundant linear strand of complex nuclear molecules. As the duplicating enzymes would copy the genetic molecule, the check at each triply redundant site provided an automatically correcting copying mechanism; if one of the three linear strands had mutated, the copying enzyme would be governed by majority rule, and the new triple strand would have the mutation corrected. If two mutations had occurred and all three sites were different, the enzyme would self-destruct, taking the faulty gene with it. It was only when the two mutations were the same that an error was able to creep
          through.




          I don't know enough biology to understand all this, but it seems to be three strands rather than twelve.



          On the other hand, the number twelve does show up a lot in more obvious parts of the cheela body. From the Technical Appendix:




          The cheela use a base 12 number system (they have twelve eyes) and their next unit of time after the turn is a great of turns or 144 turns. They occasionally use a dozen turns, but it has never had the same significance as the week does to humans. A great of turns is 28.7 seconds, while a human year is 31.6 million seconds. The ratio of a human year to a cheela great of turns is 1.1 million to one.



          From studying the history of the cheela we have learned that a cheela spends about 12 greats (six minutes) as a hatchling; 12 greats as a young apprentice, 30 greats (15 minutes) as a worker, 12 greats as an Old One tending eggs and hatchlings, then the rest of its life (maximum of 24 greats or 12 minutes) as an Aged One. All of these indications lead to the conclusion that the effective relative time scale between the cheela and humans is approximately one million to one.







          share|improve this answer

























          • okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.

            – uhoh
            8 hours ago















          3















          There is no mention of twelve-stranded DNA in the book.



          Cheela biology is described in some technical detail:




          The cheela biophysicists would not determine the genetic coding mechanism for the cheela for dozens of generations, but when they did, both they and the humans would be surprised at how different it was. Because of the high temperatures on the neutron star that attempted to disrupt everything into random chaos, and the all-pervasive magnetic field that lined everything up along the magnetic field lines, the cheela genetic structure was a triply-redundant linear strand of complex nuclear molecules. As the duplicating enzymes would copy the genetic molecule, the check at each triply redundant site provided an automatically correcting copying mechanism; if one of the three linear strands had mutated, the copying enzyme would be governed by majority rule, and the new triple strand would have the mutation corrected. If two mutations had occurred and all three sites were different, the enzyme would self-destruct, taking the faulty gene with it. It was only when the two mutations were the same that an error was able to creep
          through.




          I don't know enough biology to understand all this, but it seems to be three strands rather than twelve.



          On the other hand, the number twelve does show up a lot in more obvious parts of the cheela body. From the Technical Appendix:




          The cheela use a base 12 number system (they have twelve eyes) and their next unit of time after the turn is a great of turns or 144 turns. They occasionally use a dozen turns, but it has never had the same significance as the week does to humans. A great of turns is 28.7 seconds, while a human year is 31.6 million seconds. The ratio of a human year to a cheela great of turns is 1.1 million to one.



          From studying the history of the cheela we have learned that a cheela spends about 12 greats (six minutes) as a hatchling; 12 greats as a young apprentice, 30 greats (15 minutes) as a worker, 12 greats as an Old One tending eggs and hatchlings, then the rest of its life (maximum of 24 greats or 12 minutes) as an Aged One. All of these indications lead to the conclusion that the effective relative time scale between the cheela and humans is approximately one million to one.







          share|improve this answer

























          • okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.

            – uhoh
            8 hours ago













          3














          3










          3









          There is no mention of twelve-stranded DNA in the book.



          Cheela biology is described in some technical detail:




          The cheela biophysicists would not determine the genetic coding mechanism for the cheela for dozens of generations, but when they did, both they and the humans would be surprised at how different it was. Because of the high temperatures on the neutron star that attempted to disrupt everything into random chaos, and the all-pervasive magnetic field that lined everything up along the magnetic field lines, the cheela genetic structure was a triply-redundant linear strand of complex nuclear molecules. As the duplicating enzymes would copy the genetic molecule, the check at each triply redundant site provided an automatically correcting copying mechanism; if one of the three linear strands had mutated, the copying enzyme would be governed by majority rule, and the new triple strand would have the mutation corrected. If two mutations had occurred and all three sites were different, the enzyme would self-destruct, taking the faulty gene with it. It was only when the two mutations were the same that an error was able to creep
          through.




          I don't know enough biology to understand all this, but it seems to be three strands rather than twelve.



          On the other hand, the number twelve does show up a lot in more obvious parts of the cheela body. From the Technical Appendix:




          The cheela use a base 12 number system (they have twelve eyes) and their next unit of time after the turn is a great of turns or 144 turns. They occasionally use a dozen turns, but it has never had the same significance as the week does to humans. A great of turns is 28.7 seconds, while a human year is 31.6 million seconds. The ratio of a human year to a cheela great of turns is 1.1 million to one.



          From studying the history of the cheela we have learned that a cheela spends about 12 greats (six minutes) as a hatchling; 12 greats as a young apprentice, 30 greats (15 minutes) as a worker, 12 greats as an Old One tending eggs and hatchlings, then the rest of its life (maximum of 24 greats or 12 minutes) as an Aged One. All of these indications lead to the conclusion that the effective relative time scale between the cheela and humans is approximately one million to one.







          share|improve this answer













          There is no mention of twelve-stranded DNA in the book.



          Cheela biology is described in some technical detail:




          The cheela biophysicists would not determine the genetic coding mechanism for the cheela for dozens of generations, but when they did, both they and the humans would be surprised at how different it was. Because of the high temperatures on the neutron star that attempted to disrupt everything into random chaos, and the all-pervasive magnetic field that lined everything up along the magnetic field lines, the cheela genetic structure was a triply-redundant linear strand of complex nuclear molecules. As the duplicating enzymes would copy the genetic molecule, the check at each triply redundant site provided an automatically correcting copying mechanism; if one of the three linear strands had mutated, the copying enzyme would be governed by majority rule, and the new triple strand would have the mutation corrected. If two mutations had occurred and all three sites were different, the enzyme would self-destruct, taking the faulty gene with it. It was only when the two mutations were the same that an error was able to creep
          through.




          I don't know enough biology to understand all this, but it seems to be three strands rather than twelve.



          On the other hand, the number twelve does show up a lot in more obvious parts of the cheela body. From the Technical Appendix:




          The cheela use a base 12 number system (they have twelve eyes) and their next unit of time after the turn is a great of turns or 144 turns. They occasionally use a dozen turns, but it has never had the same significance as the week does to humans. A great of turns is 28.7 seconds, while a human year is 31.6 million seconds. The ratio of a human year to a cheela great of turns is 1.1 million to one.



          From studying the history of the cheela we have learned that a cheela spends about 12 greats (six minutes) as a hatchling; 12 greats as a young apprentice, 30 greats (15 minutes) as a worker, 12 greats as an Old One tending eggs and hatchlings, then the rest of its life (maximum of 24 greats or 12 minutes) as an Aged One. All of these indications lead to the conclusion that the effective relative time scale between the cheela and humans is approximately one million to one.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          Rand al'ThorRand al'Thor

          102k47 gold badges491 silver badges685 bronze badges




          102k47 gold badges491 silver badges685 bronze badges















          • okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.

            – uhoh
            8 hours ago

















          • okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.

            – uhoh
            8 hours ago
















          okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.

          – uhoh
          8 hours ago





          okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.

          – uhoh
          8 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217966%2fdid-the-cheela-on-dragons-egg-have-twelve-stranded-dna%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її