Did the Cheela on Dragon's Egg have twelve-stranded “DNA”?“There were either twelve sexes or none.”Did they ever deal with non-relativistic kinematics on Dragon's Egg?
Very slow boot time and poor perfomance
Why did Khan ask Admiral James T. Kirk about Project Genesis?
Rent contract say that pets are not allowed. Possible repercussions if bringing the pet anyway?
Asymmetric table
Add newline to prompt if it's too long
Uri tokenizer as a simple state machine
Heyacrazy: No Diagonals
Obtaining the intermediate solutions in AMPL
How can I unambiguously ask for a new user's "Display Name"?
Is gzip atomic?
Numbers Decrease while Letters Increase
What does zitch dog mean?
How to determine car loan length as a function of how long I plan to keep a car
Nothing like a good ol' game of ModTen
Improving Performance of an XY Monte Carlo
What would make bones be of different colors?
Papers on arXiv solving the same problem at the same time
Non-visual Computers - thoughts?
Can a Rogue PC teach an NPC to perform Sneak Attack?
Was there ever a treaty between 2 entities with significantly different translations to the detriment of one party?
Did the Cheela on Dragon's Egg have twelve-stranded "DNA"?
Prevent use of CNAME Record for Untrusted Domain
If two Lore Bards used cutting words on an ability check or attack, would they stack?
Round towards zero
Did the Cheela on Dragon's Egg have twelve-stranded “DNA”?
“There were either twelve sexes or none.”Did they ever deal with non-relativistic kinematics on Dragon's Egg?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
The answer to my question “There were either twelve sexes or none.” explains that there were actually either five sexes or none.
I remember being confused at the time how DNA (or similar genetic material) would work with multiple sexes, but where did the twelve come from?
Is it possible that in the intervening years I mixed it up with twelve-stranded DNA-like genetic material from the Cheela on Dragon's Egg?
genetics dragons-egg
add a comment |
The answer to my question “There were either twelve sexes or none.” explains that there were actually either five sexes or none.
I remember being confused at the time how DNA (or similar genetic material) would work with multiple sexes, but where did the twelve come from?
Is it possible that in the intervening years I mixed it up with twelve-stranded DNA-like genetic material from the Cheela on Dragon's Egg?
genetics dragons-egg
add a comment |
The answer to my question “There were either twelve sexes or none.” explains that there were actually either five sexes or none.
I remember being confused at the time how DNA (or similar genetic material) would work with multiple sexes, but where did the twelve come from?
Is it possible that in the intervening years I mixed it up with twelve-stranded DNA-like genetic material from the Cheela on Dragon's Egg?
genetics dragons-egg
The answer to my question “There were either twelve sexes or none.” explains that there were actually either five sexes or none.
I remember being confused at the time how DNA (or similar genetic material) would work with multiple sexes, but where did the twelve come from?
Is it possible that in the intervening years I mixed it up with twelve-stranded DNA-like genetic material from the Cheela on Dragon's Egg?
genetics dragons-egg
genetics dragons-egg
edited 8 hours ago
uhoh
asked 8 hours ago
uhohuhoh
2,34514 silver badges47 bronze badges
2,34514 silver badges47 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There is no mention of twelve-stranded DNA in the book.
Cheela biology is described in some technical detail:
The cheela biophysicists would not determine the genetic coding mechanism for the cheela for dozens of generations, but when they did, both they and the humans would be surprised at how different it was. Because of the high temperatures on the neutron star that attempted to disrupt everything into random chaos, and the all-pervasive magnetic field that lined everything up along the magnetic field lines, the cheela genetic structure was a triply-redundant linear strand of complex nuclear molecules. As the duplicating enzymes would copy the genetic molecule, the check at each triply redundant site provided an automatically correcting copying mechanism; if one of the three linear strands had mutated, the copying enzyme would be governed by majority rule, and the new triple strand would have the mutation corrected. If two mutations had occurred and all three sites were different, the enzyme would self-destruct, taking the faulty gene with it. It was only when the two mutations were the same that an error was able to creep
through.
I don't know enough biology to understand all this, but it seems to be three strands rather than twelve.
On the other hand, the number twelve does show up a lot in more obvious parts of the cheela body. From the Technical Appendix:
The cheela use a base 12 number system (they have twelve eyes) and their next unit of time after the turn is a great of turns or 144 turns. They occasionally use a dozen turns, but it has never had the same significance as the week does to humans. A great of turns is 28.7 seconds, while a human year is 31.6 million seconds. The ratio of a human year to a cheela great of turns is 1.1 million to one.
From studying the history of the cheela we have learned that a cheela spends about 12 greats (six minutes) as a hatchling; 12 greats as a young apprentice, 30 greats (15 minutes) as a worker, 12 greats as an Old One tending eggs and hatchlings, then the rest of its life (maximum of 24 greats or 12 minutes) as an Aged One. All of these indications lead to the conclusion that the effective relative time scale between the cheela and humans is approximately one million to one.
okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.
– uhoh
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217966%2fdid-the-cheela-on-dragons-egg-have-twelve-stranded-dna%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is no mention of twelve-stranded DNA in the book.
Cheela biology is described in some technical detail:
The cheela biophysicists would not determine the genetic coding mechanism for the cheela for dozens of generations, but when they did, both they and the humans would be surprised at how different it was. Because of the high temperatures on the neutron star that attempted to disrupt everything into random chaos, and the all-pervasive magnetic field that lined everything up along the magnetic field lines, the cheela genetic structure was a triply-redundant linear strand of complex nuclear molecules. As the duplicating enzymes would copy the genetic molecule, the check at each triply redundant site provided an automatically correcting copying mechanism; if one of the three linear strands had mutated, the copying enzyme would be governed by majority rule, and the new triple strand would have the mutation corrected. If two mutations had occurred and all three sites were different, the enzyme would self-destruct, taking the faulty gene with it. It was only when the two mutations were the same that an error was able to creep
through.
I don't know enough biology to understand all this, but it seems to be three strands rather than twelve.
On the other hand, the number twelve does show up a lot in more obvious parts of the cheela body. From the Technical Appendix:
The cheela use a base 12 number system (they have twelve eyes) and their next unit of time after the turn is a great of turns or 144 turns. They occasionally use a dozen turns, but it has never had the same significance as the week does to humans. A great of turns is 28.7 seconds, while a human year is 31.6 million seconds. The ratio of a human year to a cheela great of turns is 1.1 million to one.
From studying the history of the cheela we have learned that a cheela spends about 12 greats (six minutes) as a hatchling; 12 greats as a young apprentice, 30 greats (15 minutes) as a worker, 12 greats as an Old One tending eggs and hatchlings, then the rest of its life (maximum of 24 greats or 12 minutes) as an Aged One. All of these indications lead to the conclusion that the effective relative time scale between the cheela and humans is approximately one million to one.
okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.
– uhoh
8 hours ago
add a comment |
There is no mention of twelve-stranded DNA in the book.
Cheela biology is described in some technical detail:
The cheela biophysicists would not determine the genetic coding mechanism for the cheela for dozens of generations, but when they did, both they and the humans would be surprised at how different it was. Because of the high temperatures on the neutron star that attempted to disrupt everything into random chaos, and the all-pervasive magnetic field that lined everything up along the magnetic field lines, the cheela genetic structure was a triply-redundant linear strand of complex nuclear molecules. As the duplicating enzymes would copy the genetic molecule, the check at each triply redundant site provided an automatically correcting copying mechanism; if one of the three linear strands had mutated, the copying enzyme would be governed by majority rule, and the new triple strand would have the mutation corrected. If two mutations had occurred and all three sites were different, the enzyme would self-destruct, taking the faulty gene with it. It was only when the two mutations were the same that an error was able to creep
through.
I don't know enough biology to understand all this, but it seems to be three strands rather than twelve.
On the other hand, the number twelve does show up a lot in more obvious parts of the cheela body. From the Technical Appendix:
The cheela use a base 12 number system (they have twelve eyes) and their next unit of time after the turn is a great of turns or 144 turns. They occasionally use a dozen turns, but it has never had the same significance as the week does to humans. A great of turns is 28.7 seconds, while a human year is 31.6 million seconds. The ratio of a human year to a cheela great of turns is 1.1 million to one.
From studying the history of the cheela we have learned that a cheela spends about 12 greats (six minutes) as a hatchling; 12 greats as a young apprentice, 30 greats (15 minutes) as a worker, 12 greats as an Old One tending eggs and hatchlings, then the rest of its life (maximum of 24 greats or 12 minutes) as an Aged One. All of these indications lead to the conclusion that the effective relative time scale between the cheela and humans is approximately one million to one.
okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.
– uhoh
8 hours ago
add a comment |
There is no mention of twelve-stranded DNA in the book.
Cheela biology is described in some technical detail:
The cheela biophysicists would not determine the genetic coding mechanism for the cheela for dozens of generations, but when they did, both they and the humans would be surprised at how different it was. Because of the high temperatures on the neutron star that attempted to disrupt everything into random chaos, and the all-pervasive magnetic field that lined everything up along the magnetic field lines, the cheela genetic structure was a triply-redundant linear strand of complex nuclear molecules. As the duplicating enzymes would copy the genetic molecule, the check at each triply redundant site provided an automatically correcting copying mechanism; if one of the three linear strands had mutated, the copying enzyme would be governed by majority rule, and the new triple strand would have the mutation corrected. If two mutations had occurred and all three sites were different, the enzyme would self-destruct, taking the faulty gene with it. It was only when the two mutations were the same that an error was able to creep
through.
I don't know enough biology to understand all this, but it seems to be three strands rather than twelve.
On the other hand, the number twelve does show up a lot in more obvious parts of the cheela body. From the Technical Appendix:
The cheela use a base 12 number system (they have twelve eyes) and their next unit of time after the turn is a great of turns or 144 turns. They occasionally use a dozen turns, but it has never had the same significance as the week does to humans. A great of turns is 28.7 seconds, while a human year is 31.6 million seconds. The ratio of a human year to a cheela great of turns is 1.1 million to one.
From studying the history of the cheela we have learned that a cheela spends about 12 greats (six minutes) as a hatchling; 12 greats as a young apprentice, 30 greats (15 minutes) as a worker, 12 greats as an Old One tending eggs and hatchlings, then the rest of its life (maximum of 24 greats or 12 minutes) as an Aged One. All of these indications lead to the conclusion that the effective relative time scale between the cheela and humans is approximately one million to one.
There is no mention of twelve-stranded DNA in the book.
Cheela biology is described in some technical detail:
The cheela biophysicists would not determine the genetic coding mechanism for the cheela for dozens of generations, but when they did, both they and the humans would be surprised at how different it was. Because of the high temperatures on the neutron star that attempted to disrupt everything into random chaos, and the all-pervasive magnetic field that lined everything up along the magnetic field lines, the cheela genetic structure was a triply-redundant linear strand of complex nuclear molecules. As the duplicating enzymes would copy the genetic molecule, the check at each triply redundant site provided an automatically correcting copying mechanism; if one of the three linear strands had mutated, the copying enzyme would be governed by majority rule, and the new triple strand would have the mutation corrected. If two mutations had occurred and all three sites were different, the enzyme would self-destruct, taking the faulty gene with it. It was only when the two mutations were the same that an error was able to creep
through.
I don't know enough biology to understand all this, but it seems to be three strands rather than twelve.
On the other hand, the number twelve does show up a lot in more obvious parts of the cheela body. From the Technical Appendix:
The cheela use a base 12 number system (they have twelve eyes) and their next unit of time after the turn is a great of turns or 144 turns. They occasionally use a dozen turns, but it has never had the same significance as the week does to humans. A great of turns is 28.7 seconds, while a human year is 31.6 million seconds. The ratio of a human year to a cheela great of turns is 1.1 million to one.
From studying the history of the cheela we have learned that a cheela spends about 12 greats (six minutes) as a hatchling; 12 greats as a young apprentice, 30 greats (15 minutes) as a worker, 12 greats as an Old One tending eggs and hatchlings, then the rest of its life (maximum of 24 greats or 12 minutes) as an Aged One. All of these indications lead to the conclusion that the effective relative time scale between the cheela and humans is approximately one million to one.
answered 8 hours ago
Rand al'Thor♦Rand al'Thor
102k47 gold badges491 silver badges685 bronze badges
102k47 gold badges491 silver badges685 bronze badges
okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.
– uhoh
8 hours ago
add a comment |
okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.
– uhoh
8 hours ago
okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.
– uhoh
8 hours ago
okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.
– uhoh
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217966%2fdid-the-cheela-on-dragons-egg-have-twelve-stranded-dna%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown