Does the sensor of a dslr count the number of photons that hits it?Does this look like a sensor problem?Assuming a perfect sensor, what is the physical limit of ISO/pixel area?Do compact and DSLR cameras have the same sensor size if they have the same number of megapixels?Where is the AF sensor located in a DSLR?Why is the main sensor not used instead of the separate AF sensor to focus a DSLR?What *exactly* is white balance?Light scratch on sensor: is that fixableCan a dSLR sensor be replaced with one that belongs to another model?Does the pixel count of the image sensor equate to the number of pixels of the image?What does the solution used in DSLR sensor cleaning kits contain?
How to pass rendering parameters for a static controller rendering
SOQL Query (or other means) to get the icon assigned to an object
Can a USB hub be used to access a drive from two devices?
Why did Super-VGA offer the 5:4 1280*1024 resolution?
How do I talk to my wife about unrealistic expectations?
Initializing variables in an "if" statement
How did Einstein know the speed of light was constant?
Why do most airliners have underwing engines, while business jets have rear-mounted engines?
Multi-user CRUD: Valid, Problem, or Error?
Passwordless authentication - how invalidate login code
How do resistors generate different heat if we make the current fixed and changed the voltage and resistance? Notice the flow of charge is constant
What is the maximum amount of diamond in one Minecraft game?
Attach a visible light telescope to the outside of the ISS
Is this car delivery via Ebay Motors on Craigslist a scam?
When is one 'Ready' to make Original Contributions to Mathematics?
Groups where no elements commute except for the trivial cases
Machine Learning Golf: Multiplication
Taking advantage when HR forgets to communicate the rules
How important is it for multiple POVs to run chronologically?
What is the highest level of accuracy in motion control a Victorian society could achieve?
Do Goblin tokens count as Goblins?
How predictable is $RANDOM really?
As a supervisor, what feedback would you expect from a PhD who quits?
How to say "just a precision" properly in English?
Does the sensor of a dslr count the number of photons that hits it?
Does this look like a sensor problem?Assuming a perfect sensor, what is the physical limit of ISO/pixel area?Do compact and DSLR cameras have the same sensor size if they have the same number of megapixels?Where is the AF sensor located in a DSLR?Why is the main sensor not used instead of the separate AF sensor to focus a DSLR?What *exactly* is white balance?Light scratch on sensor: is that fixableCan a dSLR sensor be replaced with one that belongs to another model?Does the pixel count of the image sensor equate to the number of pixels of the image?What does the solution used in DSLR sensor cleaning kits contain?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I'm interested in the grayscale image case.
In a sensor there is an array of cavities which collect photons.
Does each cavity count the number of signals(or peaks) generated by each photon or is there one signal which is the sum of all photons (in which case the size of the signal should depend on photon energy presumably).
And also I'm guessing each cavity correspond to a pixel?
source:
https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/camera-sensors.htm
some sources/references would be useful thanks
dslr sensor physics
New contributor
physicsnoob1000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I'm interested in the grayscale image case.
In a sensor there is an array of cavities which collect photons.
Does each cavity count the number of signals(or peaks) generated by each photon or is there one signal which is the sum of all photons (in which case the size of the signal should depend on photon energy presumably).
And also I'm guessing each cavity correspond to a pixel?
source:
https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/camera-sensors.htm
some sources/references would be useful thanks
dslr sensor physics
New contributor
physicsnoob1000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I'm interested in the grayscale image case.
In a sensor there is an array of cavities which collect photons.
Does each cavity count the number of signals(or peaks) generated by each photon or is there one signal which is the sum of all photons (in which case the size of the signal should depend on photon energy presumably).
And also I'm guessing each cavity correspond to a pixel?
source:
https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/camera-sensors.htm
some sources/references would be useful thanks
dslr sensor physics
New contributor
physicsnoob1000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I'm interested in the grayscale image case.
In a sensor there is an array of cavities which collect photons.
Does each cavity count the number of signals(or peaks) generated by each photon or is there one signal which is the sum of all photons (in which case the size of the signal should depend on photon energy presumably).
And also I'm guessing each cavity correspond to a pixel?
source:
https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/camera-sensors.htm
some sources/references would be useful thanks
dslr sensor physics
dslr sensor physics
New contributor
physicsnoob1000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
physicsnoob1000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
physicsnoob1000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 9 hours ago
physicsnoob1000physicsnoob1000
1112 bronze badges
1112 bronze badges
New contributor
physicsnoob1000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
physicsnoob1000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
No, you won't obtain the photon count directly. Also, a camera sensor has noise, not just from photon counting but also from electrical circuits.
Also, a DSLR has a color filter on top of the pixels, even if you take only grayscale images. It will probabilistically filter away some photons. If the photon is of the correct color, chances of it passing the filter are much higher than with an incorrect colored photon.
There are sensors that count incoming photons, but a DSLR sensor is not among them. DSLR sensor just gives a single "intensity" value per pixel that is full of noise. It is roughly similar to sum of all incoming photons, but because of the noise, you can't tell the number of photons exactly as an integer.
If you are looking for a photon counting detector, this may not be the best place to ask. There is no Scientific Instrument Stack Exchange, but Physics Stack Exchange may come close.
Typically, photon counting detectors are cooled with liquid nitrogen to really low temperatures to minimize electrical noise coming from thermal effects. Needless to say, a DSLR isn't designed to be cooled to such low temperatures.
At shorter wavelengths such as X rays, you can actually count photons using a room temperature sensor, so no cooling required. However, light has far longer wavelength than X rays. I'd say it would make a great question on Physics Stack Exchange to ask whether a visible light photon counting sensor can be made without requiring cooling.
1
I haven’t seen liquid nitrogen cooled dslr, but there are a few companies making coolers targeted toward astrophotographers on the market.
– Hueco
4 hours ago
You can count visible-light photons if the rate of arrival is low enough for sure. Eyes can do this (I think dark-adapted human eyes are sensitive on the order of 10 photons but ?cats? and ?frogs? can detect single photons.
– tfb
1 hour ago
"whether a visible light photon counting sensor can be made without requiring cooling" - I'm sure if we could, we would.
– whatsisname
25 mins ago
add a comment |
The sensor is an array of silicon photodiodes that simply convert light energy into electricity.
They are interchangeably called pixels, photo sites, photo diodes. Pixel actually refers to picture element and it is the least accurate term in this aspect. Because each pixel uses information from adjoining photosites to determine its' color/brightness value, even for greyscale output (other than possibly a monochrome camera like the Leica Monochrom). But the location of a photo site does directly correlate with the location of a pixel in the output image.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "61"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
physicsnoob1000 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f109313%2fdoes-the-sensor-of-a-dslr-count-the-number-of-photons-that-hits-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No, you won't obtain the photon count directly. Also, a camera sensor has noise, not just from photon counting but also from electrical circuits.
Also, a DSLR has a color filter on top of the pixels, even if you take only grayscale images. It will probabilistically filter away some photons. If the photon is of the correct color, chances of it passing the filter are much higher than with an incorrect colored photon.
There are sensors that count incoming photons, but a DSLR sensor is not among them. DSLR sensor just gives a single "intensity" value per pixel that is full of noise. It is roughly similar to sum of all incoming photons, but because of the noise, you can't tell the number of photons exactly as an integer.
If you are looking for a photon counting detector, this may not be the best place to ask. There is no Scientific Instrument Stack Exchange, but Physics Stack Exchange may come close.
Typically, photon counting detectors are cooled with liquid nitrogen to really low temperatures to minimize electrical noise coming from thermal effects. Needless to say, a DSLR isn't designed to be cooled to such low temperatures.
At shorter wavelengths such as X rays, you can actually count photons using a room temperature sensor, so no cooling required. However, light has far longer wavelength than X rays. I'd say it would make a great question on Physics Stack Exchange to ask whether a visible light photon counting sensor can be made without requiring cooling.
1
I haven’t seen liquid nitrogen cooled dslr, but there are a few companies making coolers targeted toward astrophotographers on the market.
– Hueco
4 hours ago
You can count visible-light photons if the rate of arrival is low enough for sure. Eyes can do this (I think dark-adapted human eyes are sensitive on the order of 10 photons but ?cats? and ?frogs? can detect single photons.
– tfb
1 hour ago
"whether a visible light photon counting sensor can be made without requiring cooling" - I'm sure if we could, we would.
– whatsisname
25 mins ago
add a comment |
No, you won't obtain the photon count directly. Also, a camera sensor has noise, not just from photon counting but also from electrical circuits.
Also, a DSLR has a color filter on top of the pixels, even if you take only grayscale images. It will probabilistically filter away some photons. If the photon is of the correct color, chances of it passing the filter are much higher than with an incorrect colored photon.
There are sensors that count incoming photons, but a DSLR sensor is not among them. DSLR sensor just gives a single "intensity" value per pixel that is full of noise. It is roughly similar to sum of all incoming photons, but because of the noise, you can't tell the number of photons exactly as an integer.
If you are looking for a photon counting detector, this may not be the best place to ask. There is no Scientific Instrument Stack Exchange, but Physics Stack Exchange may come close.
Typically, photon counting detectors are cooled with liquid nitrogen to really low temperatures to minimize electrical noise coming from thermal effects. Needless to say, a DSLR isn't designed to be cooled to such low temperatures.
At shorter wavelengths such as X rays, you can actually count photons using a room temperature sensor, so no cooling required. However, light has far longer wavelength than X rays. I'd say it would make a great question on Physics Stack Exchange to ask whether a visible light photon counting sensor can be made without requiring cooling.
1
I haven’t seen liquid nitrogen cooled dslr, but there are a few companies making coolers targeted toward astrophotographers on the market.
– Hueco
4 hours ago
You can count visible-light photons if the rate of arrival is low enough for sure. Eyes can do this (I think dark-adapted human eyes are sensitive on the order of 10 photons but ?cats? and ?frogs? can detect single photons.
– tfb
1 hour ago
"whether a visible light photon counting sensor can be made without requiring cooling" - I'm sure if we could, we would.
– whatsisname
25 mins ago
add a comment |
No, you won't obtain the photon count directly. Also, a camera sensor has noise, not just from photon counting but also from electrical circuits.
Also, a DSLR has a color filter on top of the pixels, even if you take only grayscale images. It will probabilistically filter away some photons. If the photon is of the correct color, chances of it passing the filter are much higher than with an incorrect colored photon.
There are sensors that count incoming photons, but a DSLR sensor is not among them. DSLR sensor just gives a single "intensity" value per pixel that is full of noise. It is roughly similar to sum of all incoming photons, but because of the noise, you can't tell the number of photons exactly as an integer.
If you are looking for a photon counting detector, this may not be the best place to ask. There is no Scientific Instrument Stack Exchange, but Physics Stack Exchange may come close.
Typically, photon counting detectors are cooled with liquid nitrogen to really low temperatures to minimize electrical noise coming from thermal effects. Needless to say, a DSLR isn't designed to be cooled to such low temperatures.
At shorter wavelengths such as X rays, you can actually count photons using a room temperature sensor, so no cooling required. However, light has far longer wavelength than X rays. I'd say it would make a great question on Physics Stack Exchange to ask whether a visible light photon counting sensor can be made without requiring cooling.
No, you won't obtain the photon count directly. Also, a camera sensor has noise, not just from photon counting but also from electrical circuits.
Also, a DSLR has a color filter on top of the pixels, even if you take only grayscale images. It will probabilistically filter away some photons. If the photon is of the correct color, chances of it passing the filter are much higher than with an incorrect colored photon.
There are sensors that count incoming photons, but a DSLR sensor is not among them. DSLR sensor just gives a single "intensity" value per pixel that is full of noise. It is roughly similar to sum of all incoming photons, but because of the noise, you can't tell the number of photons exactly as an integer.
If you are looking for a photon counting detector, this may not be the best place to ask. There is no Scientific Instrument Stack Exchange, but Physics Stack Exchange may come close.
Typically, photon counting detectors are cooled with liquid nitrogen to really low temperatures to minimize electrical noise coming from thermal effects. Needless to say, a DSLR isn't designed to be cooled to such low temperatures.
At shorter wavelengths such as X rays, you can actually count photons using a room temperature sensor, so no cooling required. However, light has far longer wavelength than X rays. I'd say it would make a great question on Physics Stack Exchange to ask whether a visible light photon counting sensor can be made without requiring cooling.
answered 9 hours ago
juhistjuhist
1,5851 silver badge18 bronze badges
1,5851 silver badge18 bronze badges
1
I haven’t seen liquid nitrogen cooled dslr, but there are a few companies making coolers targeted toward astrophotographers on the market.
– Hueco
4 hours ago
You can count visible-light photons if the rate of arrival is low enough for sure. Eyes can do this (I think dark-adapted human eyes are sensitive on the order of 10 photons but ?cats? and ?frogs? can detect single photons.
– tfb
1 hour ago
"whether a visible light photon counting sensor can be made without requiring cooling" - I'm sure if we could, we would.
– whatsisname
25 mins ago
add a comment |
1
I haven’t seen liquid nitrogen cooled dslr, but there are a few companies making coolers targeted toward astrophotographers on the market.
– Hueco
4 hours ago
You can count visible-light photons if the rate of arrival is low enough for sure. Eyes can do this (I think dark-adapted human eyes are sensitive on the order of 10 photons but ?cats? and ?frogs? can detect single photons.
– tfb
1 hour ago
"whether a visible light photon counting sensor can be made without requiring cooling" - I'm sure if we could, we would.
– whatsisname
25 mins ago
1
1
I haven’t seen liquid nitrogen cooled dslr, but there are a few companies making coolers targeted toward astrophotographers on the market.
– Hueco
4 hours ago
I haven’t seen liquid nitrogen cooled dslr, but there are a few companies making coolers targeted toward astrophotographers on the market.
– Hueco
4 hours ago
You can count visible-light photons if the rate of arrival is low enough for sure. Eyes can do this (I think dark-adapted human eyes are sensitive on the order of 10 photons but ?cats? and ?frogs? can detect single photons.
– tfb
1 hour ago
You can count visible-light photons if the rate of arrival is low enough for sure. Eyes can do this (I think dark-adapted human eyes are sensitive on the order of 10 photons but ?cats? and ?frogs? can detect single photons.
– tfb
1 hour ago
"whether a visible light photon counting sensor can be made without requiring cooling" - I'm sure if we could, we would.
– whatsisname
25 mins ago
"whether a visible light photon counting sensor can be made without requiring cooling" - I'm sure if we could, we would.
– whatsisname
25 mins ago
add a comment |
The sensor is an array of silicon photodiodes that simply convert light energy into electricity.
They are interchangeably called pixels, photo sites, photo diodes. Pixel actually refers to picture element and it is the least accurate term in this aspect. Because each pixel uses information from adjoining photosites to determine its' color/brightness value, even for greyscale output (other than possibly a monochrome camera like the Leica Monochrom). But the location of a photo site does directly correlate with the location of a pixel in the output image.
add a comment |
The sensor is an array of silicon photodiodes that simply convert light energy into electricity.
They are interchangeably called pixels, photo sites, photo diodes. Pixel actually refers to picture element and it is the least accurate term in this aspect. Because each pixel uses information from adjoining photosites to determine its' color/brightness value, even for greyscale output (other than possibly a monochrome camera like the Leica Monochrom). But the location of a photo site does directly correlate with the location of a pixel in the output image.
add a comment |
The sensor is an array of silicon photodiodes that simply convert light energy into electricity.
They are interchangeably called pixels, photo sites, photo diodes. Pixel actually refers to picture element and it is the least accurate term in this aspect. Because each pixel uses information from adjoining photosites to determine its' color/brightness value, even for greyscale output (other than possibly a monochrome camera like the Leica Monochrom). But the location of a photo site does directly correlate with the location of a pixel in the output image.
The sensor is an array of silicon photodiodes that simply convert light energy into electricity.
They are interchangeably called pixels, photo sites, photo diodes. Pixel actually refers to picture element and it is the least accurate term in this aspect. Because each pixel uses information from adjoining photosites to determine its' color/brightness value, even for greyscale output (other than possibly a monochrome camera like the Leica Monochrom). But the location of a photo site does directly correlate with the location of a pixel in the output image.
answered 2 hours ago
Steven KerstingSteven Kersting
6971 silver badge8 bronze badges
6971 silver badge8 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
physicsnoob1000 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
physicsnoob1000 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
physicsnoob1000 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
physicsnoob1000 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f109313%2fdoes-the-sensor-of-a-dslr-count-the-number-of-photons-that-hits-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown