Left Side Underexposed on Film Camera(How) should I start with film photography?My roll of film didn't rewind inside all the wayHow far can you push process an accidentally under-exposed film?Can I mount Sony A-mount lenses to a Minolta MD/MC body?Are overheated rolls of film (both exposed and unexposed) likely to be damaged?Hold baggage xray scanners - how likely is it my film might have survived?Minolta SR-101 Shutter stuck (?) but film advance lever worksWhy is there blue 1" edges on developed 35mm film?How do I figure out what ISO to use when shooting film?Why is there an underexposed “shadow” along edge of frame on 35mm film when using my 70-210mm lens?

SIunitx error when using lighter weight

Can you take the Dodge action while prone?

How did Einstein know the speed of light was constant?

How predictable is $RANDOM really?

What happens if the limit of 4 billion files was exceeded in an ext4 partition?

Options for quick email reply to the effect of "I've just done it" or "I've taken care of it"

PhD: When to quit and move on?

Do Goblin tokens count as Goblins?

Did Stalin kill all Soviet officers involved in the Winter War?

Taking advantage when HR forgets to communicate the rules

Why do Klingons use cloaking devices?

Examples of fluid (including air) being used to transmit digital data?

What is the maximum amount of diamond in one Minecraft game?

How do resistors generate different heat if we make the current fixed and changed the voltage and resistance? Notice the flow of charge is constant

What is the meaning of "prairie-dog" in this sentence?

How would a sea turtle end up on its back?

Will Jimmy fall off his platform?

Was the 45.9°C temperature in France in June 2019 the highest ever recorded in France?

How can I use my cell phone's light as a reading light?

Do intermediate subdomains need to exist?

I'm feeling like my character doesn't fit the campaign

Why do we need a bootloader separate from our application program in microcontrollers?

Is this standard Japanese employment negotiations, or am I missing something?

Soda water first stored in refrigerator and then outside



Left Side Underexposed on Film Camera


(How) should I start with film photography?My roll of film didn't rewind inside all the wayHow far can you push process an accidentally under-exposed film?Can I mount Sony A-mount lenses to a Minolta MD/MC body?Are overheated rolls of film (both exposed and unexposed) likely to be damaged?Hold baggage xray scanners - how likely is it my film might have survived?Minolta SR-101 Shutter stuck (?) but film advance lever worksWhy is there blue 1" edges on developed 35mm film?How do I figure out what ISO to use when shooting film?Why is there an underexposed “shadow” along edge of frame on 35mm film when using my 70-210mm lens?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I've been using my grandfather's Seagull DF-1ETM (Chinese equivalent of the Minolta SRT 101) and on some of the photos, the left edge would be under-exposed.



This photo was fine.



This photo is not fine.



Does anyone know what could be causing this? I don't use a flash, if that helps.










share|improve this question







New contributor



taotao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1





    Are you using a lens hood that could be on a little crooked causing vignetting on one side. Or holding your hand on that side for focusing and possible blocking light ? Both unlikely as the the portion underexposed is uniform like that caused by a sticky shutter. Just exploring all the possibilities. Have you just started using the camera after it was sitting for years in the closet? If you have used it often recently, has this just started ?

    – Alaska Man
    3 hours ago

















2















I've been using my grandfather's Seagull DF-1ETM (Chinese equivalent of the Minolta SRT 101) and on some of the photos, the left edge would be under-exposed.



This photo was fine.



This photo is not fine.



Does anyone know what could be causing this? I don't use a flash, if that helps.










share|improve this question







New contributor



taotao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1





    Are you using a lens hood that could be on a little crooked causing vignetting on one side. Or holding your hand on that side for focusing and possible blocking light ? Both unlikely as the the portion underexposed is uniform like that caused by a sticky shutter. Just exploring all the possibilities. Have you just started using the camera after it was sitting for years in the closet? If you have used it often recently, has this just started ?

    – Alaska Man
    3 hours ago













2












2








2








I've been using my grandfather's Seagull DF-1ETM (Chinese equivalent of the Minolta SRT 101) and on some of the photos, the left edge would be under-exposed.



This photo was fine.



This photo is not fine.



Does anyone know what could be causing this? I don't use a flash, if that helps.










share|improve this question







New contributor



taotao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I've been using my grandfather's Seagull DF-1ETM (Chinese equivalent of the Minolta SRT 101) and on some of the photos, the left edge would be under-exposed.



This photo was fine.



This photo is not fine.



Does anyone know what could be causing this? I don't use a flash, if that helps.







film shutter minolta






share|improve this question







New contributor



taotao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question







New contributor



taotao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor



taotao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









taotaotaotao

111 bronze badge




111 bronze badge




New contributor



taotao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




taotao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 1





    Are you using a lens hood that could be on a little crooked causing vignetting on one side. Or holding your hand on that side for focusing and possible blocking light ? Both unlikely as the the portion underexposed is uniform like that caused by a sticky shutter. Just exploring all the possibilities. Have you just started using the camera after it was sitting for years in the closet? If you have used it often recently, has this just started ?

    – Alaska Man
    3 hours ago












  • 1





    Are you using a lens hood that could be on a little crooked causing vignetting on one side. Or holding your hand on that side for focusing and possible blocking light ? Both unlikely as the the portion underexposed is uniform like that caused by a sticky shutter. Just exploring all the possibilities. Have you just started using the camera after it was sitting for years in the closet? If you have used it often recently, has this just started ?

    – Alaska Man
    3 hours ago







1




1





Are you using a lens hood that could be on a little crooked causing vignetting on one side. Or holding your hand on that side for focusing and possible blocking light ? Both unlikely as the the portion underexposed is uniform like that caused by a sticky shutter. Just exploring all the possibilities. Have you just started using the camera after it was sitting for years in the closet? If you have used it often recently, has this just started ?

– Alaska Man
3 hours ago





Are you using a lens hood that could be on a little crooked causing vignetting on one side. Or holding your hand on that side for focusing and possible blocking light ? Both unlikely as the the portion underexposed is uniform like that caused by a sticky shutter. Just exploring all the possibilities. Have you just started using the camera after it was sitting for years in the closet? If you have used it often recently, has this just started ?

– Alaska Man
3 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














Probably caused by a sticking shutter.



Multiple possible causes... the only thing to do is have it serviced and hopefully it is something easy to fix (CLA as Hueco said). Last film camera I took in to have the shutter fixed was DOA w/ no repair parts available... and that was over a decade ago.
Either way it will probably cost more than the camera is worth (other than sentimental value).






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Your answer would be informative if you explained what would cause a "sticking shutter", how a sticky shutter would cause this AND what to do about it.

    – Alaska Man
    3 hours ago












  • Perhaps my subtle suggestion was to subtle The point I was trying to make is your answer is just a one line answer without any additional information. On this site answers work best if you give detailed explanations as to why it is the correct answer and how to address the problem. If you edit your answer to include those things it will be better for everyone with similar problems that run across this question in the future.

    – Alaska Man
    2 hours ago











  • Ok, done.......

    – Steven Kersting
    2 hours ago


















1














This is a focal-plane shutter which is unhappy. It's hard to tell for certain without exposure information, but given the light and plausible film speed the shutter will have been working in the mode where it never fully opens but rather a slot moves across the film plane (in other words the exposure is shorter than the flash sync speed). And what is happening is that either the slot width is varying or the speed the slot is being pulled over the film at a varying speed. I believe the former is not usually possible, so it will be the latter.



This is a common problem with focal-plane shutters and the solution is to get the camera looked at by someone competent: a CLA will fix it.






share|improve this answer























  • I think the issue is that the first curtain is not opening immediately/smoothly when the shutter is released, resulting in underexposure at the beginning of the frame. It is dragging as it comes up to speed, resulting in the gradient. Hopefully a CLA will fix it, but there are other possible causes that would require replacement of the shutter, and parts are probably not available. Either way it will probably cost more than the camera is worth (other than sentimental value).

    – Steven Kersting
    2 hours ago














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "61"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






taotao is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f109316%2fleft-side-underexposed-on-film-camera%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














Probably caused by a sticking shutter.



Multiple possible causes... the only thing to do is have it serviced and hopefully it is something easy to fix (CLA as Hueco said). Last film camera I took in to have the shutter fixed was DOA w/ no repair parts available... and that was over a decade ago.
Either way it will probably cost more than the camera is worth (other than sentimental value).






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Your answer would be informative if you explained what would cause a "sticking shutter", how a sticky shutter would cause this AND what to do about it.

    – Alaska Man
    3 hours ago












  • Perhaps my subtle suggestion was to subtle The point I was trying to make is your answer is just a one line answer without any additional information. On this site answers work best if you give detailed explanations as to why it is the correct answer and how to address the problem. If you edit your answer to include those things it will be better for everyone with similar problems that run across this question in the future.

    – Alaska Man
    2 hours ago











  • Ok, done.......

    – Steven Kersting
    2 hours ago















2














Probably caused by a sticking shutter.



Multiple possible causes... the only thing to do is have it serviced and hopefully it is something easy to fix (CLA as Hueco said). Last film camera I took in to have the shutter fixed was DOA w/ no repair parts available... and that was over a decade ago.
Either way it will probably cost more than the camera is worth (other than sentimental value).






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Your answer would be informative if you explained what would cause a "sticking shutter", how a sticky shutter would cause this AND what to do about it.

    – Alaska Man
    3 hours ago












  • Perhaps my subtle suggestion was to subtle The point I was trying to make is your answer is just a one line answer without any additional information. On this site answers work best if you give detailed explanations as to why it is the correct answer and how to address the problem. If you edit your answer to include those things it will be better for everyone with similar problems that run across this question in the future.

    – Alaska Man
    2 hours ago











  • Ok, done.......

    – Steven Kersting
    2 hours ago













2












2








2







Probably caused by a sticking shutter.



Multiple possible causes... the only thing to do is have it serviced and hopefully it is something easy to fix (CLA as Hueco said). Last film camera I took in to have the shutter fixed was DOA w/ no repair parts available... and that was over a decade ago.
Either way it will probably cost more than the camera is worth (other than sentimental value).






share|improve this answer















Probably caused by a sticking shutter.



Multiple possible causes... the only thing to do is have it serviced and hopefully it is something easy to fix (CLA as Hueco said). Last film camera I took in to have the shutter fixed was DOA w/ no repair parts available... and that was over a decade ago.
Either way it will probably cost more than the camera is worth (other than sentimental value).







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 8 hours ago









Steven KerstingSteven Kersting

6971 silver badge8 bronze badges




6971 silver badge8 bronze badges







  • 3





    Your answer would be informative if you explained what would cause a "sticking shutter", how a sticky shutter would cause this AND what to do about it.

    – Alaska Man
    3 hours ago












  • Perhaps my subtle suggestion was to subtle The point I was trying to make is your answer is just a one line answer without any additional information. On this site answers work best if you give detailed explanations as to why it is the correct answer and how to address the problem. If you edit your answer to include those things it will be better for everyone with similar problems that run across this question in the future.

    – Alaska Man
    2 hours ago











  • Ok, done.......

    – Steven Kersting
    2 hours ago












  • 3





    Your answer would be informative if you explained what would cause a "sticking shutter", how a sticky shutter would cause this AND what to do about it.

    – Alaska Man
    3 hours ago












  • Perhaps my subtle suggestion was to subtle The point I was trying to make is your answer is just a one line answer without any additional information. On this site answers work best if you give detailed explanations as to why it is the correct answer and how to address the problem. If you edit your answer to include those things it will be better for everyone with similar problems that run across this question in the future.

    – Alaska Man
    2 hours ago











  • Ok, done.......

    – Steven Kersting
    2 hours ago







3




3





Your answer would be informative if you explained what would cause a "sticking shutter", how a sticky shutter would cause this AND what to do about it.

– Alaska Man
3 hours ago






Your answer would be informative if you explained what would cause a "sticking shutter", how a sticky shutter would cause this AND what to do about it.

– Alaska Man
3 hours ago














Perhaps my subtle suggestion was to subtle The point I was trying to make is your answer is just a one line answer without any additional information. On this site answers work best if you give detailed explanations as to why it is the correct answer and how to address the problem. If you edit your answer to include those things it will be better for everyone with similar problems that run across this question in the future.

– Alaska Man
2 hours ago





Perhaps my subtle suggestion was to subtle The point I was trying to make is your answer is just a one line answer without any additional information. On this site answers work best if you give detailed explanations as to why it is the correct answer and how to address the problem. If you edit your answer to include those things it will be better for everyone with similar problems that run across this question in the future.

– Alaska Man
2 hours ago













Ok, done.......

– Steven Kersting
2 hours ago





Ok, done.......

– Steven Kersting
2 hours ago













1














This is a focal-plane shutter which is unhappy. It's hard to tell for certain without exposure information, but given the light and plausible film speed the shutter will have been working in the mode where it never fully opens but rather a slot moves across the film plane (in other words the exposure is shorter than the flash sync speed). And what is happening is that either the slot width is varying or the speed the slot is being pulled over the film at a varying speed. I believe the former is not usually possible, so it will be the latter.



This is a common problem with focal-plane shutters and the solution is to get the camera looked at by someone competent: a CLA will fix it.






share|improve this answer























  • I think the issue is that the first curtain is not opening immediately/smoothly when the shutter is released, resulting in underexposure at the beginning of the frame. It is dragging as it comes up to speed, resulting in the gradient. Hopefully a CLA will fix it, but there are other possible causes that would require replacement of the shutter, and parts are probably not available. Either way it will probably cost more than the camera is worth (other than sentimental value).

    – Steven Kersting
    2 hours ago
















1














This is a focal-plane shutter which is unhappy. It's hard to tell for certain without exposure information, but given the light and plausible film speed the shutter will have been working in the mode where it never fully opens but rather a slot moves across the film plane (in other words the exposure is shorter than the flash sync speed). And what is happening is that either the slot width is varying or the speed the slot is being pulled over the film at a varying speed. I believe the former is not usually possible, so it will be the latter.



This is a common problem with focal-plane shutters and the solution is to get the camera looked at by someone competent: a CLA will fix it.






share|improve this answer























  • I think the issue is that the first curtain is not opening immediately/smoothly when the shutter is released, resulting in underexposure at the beginning of the frame. It is dragging as it comes up to speed, resulting in the gradient. Hopefully a CLA will fix it, but there are other possible causes that would require replacement of the shutter, and parts are probably not available. Either way it will probably cost more than the camera is worth (other than sentimental value).

    – Steven Kersting
    2 hours ago














1












1








1







This is a focal-plane shutter which is unhappy. It's hard to tell for certain without exposure information, but given the light and plausible film speed the shutter will have been working in the mode where it never fully opens but rather a slot moves across the film plane (in other words the exposure is shorter than the flash sync speed). And what is happening is that either the slot width is varying or the speed the slot is being pulled over the film at a varying speed. I believe the former is not usually possible, so it will be the latter.



This is a common problem with focal-plane shutters and the solution is to get the camera looked at by someone competent: a CLA will fix it.






share|improve this answer













This is a focal-plane shutter which is unhappy. It's hard to tell for certain without exposure information, but given the light and plausible film speed the shutter will have been working in the mode where it never fully opens but rather a slot moves across the film plane (in other words the exposure is shorter than the flash sync speed). And what is happening is that either the slot width is varying or the speed the slot is being pulled over the film at a varying speed. I believe the former is not usually possible, so it will be the latter.



This is a common problem with focal-plane shutters and the solution is to get the camera looked at by someone competent: a CLA will fix it.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 hours ago









tfbtfb

1,0681 silver badge10 bronze badges




1,0681 silver badge10 bronze badges












  • I think the issue is that the first curtain is not opening immediately/smoothly when the shutter is released, resulting in underexposure at the beginning of the frame. It is dragging as it comes up to speed, resulting in the gradient. Hopefully a CLA will fix it, but there are other possible causes that would require replacement of the shutter, and parts are probably not available. Either way it will probably cost more than the camera is worth (other than sentimental value).

    – Steven Kersting
    2 hours ago


















  • I think the issue is that the first curtain is not opening immediately/smoothly when the shutter is released, resulting in underexposure at the beginning of the frame. It is dragging as it comes up to speed, resulting in the gradient. Hopefully a CLA will fix it, but there are other possible causes that would require replacement of the shutter, and parts are probably not available. Either way it will probably cost more than the camera is worth (other than sentimental value).

    – Steven Kersting
    2 hours ago

















I think the issue is that the first curtain is not opening immediately/smoothly when the shutter is released, resulting in underexposure at the beginning of the frame. It is dragging as it comes up to speed, resulting in the gradient. Hopefully a CLA will fix it, but there are other possible causes that would require replacement of the shutter, and parts are probably not available. Either way it will probably cost more than the camera is worth (other than sentimental value).

– Steven Kersting
2 hours ago






I think the issue is that the first curtain is not opening immediately/smoothly when the shutter is released, resulting in underexposure at the beginning of the frame. It is dragging as it comes up to speed, resulting in the gradient. Hopefully a CLA will fix it, but there are other possible causes that would require replacement of the shutter, and parts are probably not available. Either way it will probably cost more than the camera is worth (other than sentimental value).

– Steven Kersting
2 hours ago











taotao is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















taotao is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












taotao is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











taotao is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f109316%2fleft-side-underexposed-on-film-camera%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單