Checkmate in 1 on a Tangled BoardHow many Queens on a boardQueens on a Board with Two PlayersReplace a piece to checkmateCheckmate all the kings #1Checkmate all the kings #2Checkmate all the kings #3Checkmate all the kings #4Deliver a checkmate on a cylindrical chessboard with the least cumulative piece valueFind Those Notations #5!A Fairy-ly Odd Chess Identification Puzzle

Are the requirements of a Horn of Valhalla cumulative?

Does a return economy-class seat between London and San Francisco release 5.28 tonnes of CO2 equivalents?

Can a nowhere continuous function have a connected graph?

How did researchers find articles before the Internet and the computer era?

Why was Mal so quick to drop Bester in favour of Kaylee?

Why is Japan trying to have a better relationship with Iran?

How is this practical and very old scene shot?

Is there reliable evidence that depleted uranium from the 1999 NATO bombing is causing cancer in Serbia?

for xml path('') output

How can I tell what kind of genitals people have without gender?

Do home values typically rise and fall at a consistent percent?

How did Lefschetz do mathematics without hands?

What will happen if I checked in for another room in the same hotel, but not for the booked one?

How to unit test methods which using static methods?

Word ending in "-ine" for rat-like

Most elegant way to write a one-shot 'if'

13th chords on guitar

What's the safest way to inform a new user of their password on an invite-only website?

What game is this character in the Pixels movie from?

The warming up game

What exactly did Ant-Man see that made him say that their plan worked?

Are all commands with an optional argument fragile?

How can a valley surrounded by mountains be fertile and rainy?

Bin Packing with Relational Penalization



Checkmate in 1 on a Tangled Board


How many Queens on a boardQueens on a Board with Two PlayersReplace a piece to checkmateCheckmate all the kings #1Checkmate all the kings #2Checkmate all the kings #3Checkmate all the kings #4Deliver a checkmate on a cylindrical chessboard with the least cumulative piece valueFind Those Notations #5!A Fairy-ly Odd Chess Identification Puzzle






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








11












$begingroup$


Lots of pieces are tangled here.

Can you find mate in one?



enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    11












    $begingroup$


    Lots of pieces are tangled here.

    Can you find mate in one?



    enter image description here










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      11












      11








      11





      $begingroup$


      Lots of pieces are tangled here.

      Can you find mate in one?



      enter image description here










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Lots of pieces are tangled here.

      Can you find mate in one?



      enter image description here







      chess






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 3 hours ago









      Omega Krypton

      8,9122 gold badges12 silver badges67 bronze badges




      8,9122 gold badges12 silver badges67 bronze badges










      asked 8 hours ago









      shoopishoopi

      9865 silver badges16 bronze badges




      9865 silver badges16 bronze badges




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7












          $begingroup$


          Nxc4




          is mate because




          pawn b5 is pinned







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Beat me by about ten seconds...
            $endgroup$
            – Jeff Zeitlin
            8 hours ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            I'm pretty sure that's not right. :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Bass
            6 hours ago


















          6












          $begingroup$

          To add on to Glorfindel's answer,




          ...cxd3 is also mate, assuming white just played d2 to d4. The question doesn't state if we're finding mate for white or black.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Nice spot there!
            $endgroup$
            – Rewan Demontay
            6 hours ago


















          6












          $begingroup$

          There certainly is more than meets the eye here.



          First of all,




          It cannot be white's turn: if it were, black's previous move would have been either knight takes (knight or rook) on b4 OR d-pawn takes on c1 and promotes to queen: any other move would have been made from an illegal position. In particular, the knight cannot have moved to an empty b4, because then the white bishop would have been checking the black king on white's previous move, which is illegal. In case you were wondering whether the white bishop could have captured something on c3 to give check legally, that's also impossible, since a black pawn would have needed to capture to get there, and the rest of the black pieces are still on board. But could there have been a promoted black piece there? HMMM.. Looks like this needs another chapter, because the captures made by the white pawns aren't quite trivial.




          EDITED: dig down the rabbit hole to see how far it goes:




          If there was a promoted black piece on c3, let's see which pawn it was. Black's a, b, and c-pawns are still on the board, so it wasn't any of them. White's b-pawn must have taken a promoted piece on the c-file, and black's d-pawn (or another promoted piece) to get to the d-file. White's h-pawn must have been promoted to replace the piece captured on the b-file. For this to happen, it must have captured black's g-pawn, or another promoted piece. White's g-pawn has also taken at f3.




          So we can account for




          3 black pawns on the board, d and f black pawns taken, black g pawn promoted to replace the piece white's h-pawn took, and the black h-pawn promoted and then fed to white's b-pawn on c-file. This leaves black's e-pawn. Could it somehow have gotten promoted? Or could it have sacrificed itself to clear a promotion path for another pawn? Not without some additional black pieces taken, it seems, so it must have died a meaningless death.


          All this means that there couldn't have been many enough promoted black pieces in the game in order for one of them to have been at c3.




          Back to the business, since the rabbit hole seems to have checked out:




          Now then, both of the two moves suggested (in bold) in the first spoiler block are also impossible, because they'd need to capture a piece. Because black has a doubled pawn, one white piece was necessarily taken earlier, and white has the rest of the pieces still on the board.


          Since black has no legal last move, it must be black's turn.




          Now that we have that established, we need to figure out




          what could have been white's previous move. This is tricky, since black still has very few options to account for a legal previous move.


          Any move "on the outside" leaves black without a legal previous move, and as long as the white pawn at d4 was still there, the c3 bishop must have been on the black king's diagonal, meaning that the black knight couldn't have moved either. Therefore, the previous black piece to move would have been either the queen or the pawn at b5. Since there aren't any squares the queen could have come from (even allowing for one white move afterwards), and the pawn move also proves impossible (there's no way the white rook could legally have gotten to c5 in that case) we must deduce that white's d4 pawn cannot have been there two moves ago, because black's previous move must have been with the knight, and so the white bishop cannot have been on the black king's diagonal.




          Now this is interesting, because it means the pawn was somewhere else. If it were on d3, the black knight would have nowhere to have come from,




          so white's pawn was on d2, black's knight was on d3, and white's bishop was somewhere else, like e5, for example.




          So three half-moves ago, the board must necessarily have looked something like this:




          enter image description here

          (white's dark square bishop could also be elsewhere on the long diagonal)




          From which the only way to reach the current position is





          1. Bc3+ - Nb4
          2. d4



          Which finally allows for the long sought after mate in one:




          2. - cxd3 e.p.#!




          I may have missed some specific variations, please drop a comment if you notice one. And thanks again, OP, for another brilliant puzzle!






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I figured that it would be something like this-I just couldn't quite figure it out myself.
            $endgroup$
            – Rewan Demontay
            5 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "559"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f85541%2fcheckmate-in-1-on-a-tangled-board%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7












          $begingroup$


          Nxc4




          is mate because




          pawn b5 is pinned







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Beat me by about ten seconds...
            $endgroup$
            – Jeff Zeitlin
            8 hours ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            I'm pretty sure that's not right. :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Bass
            6 hours ago















          7












          $begingroup$


          Nxc4




          is mate because




          pawn b5 is pinned







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Beat me by about ten seconds...
            $endgroup$
            – Jeff Zeitlin
            8 hours ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            I'm pretty sure that's not right. :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Bass
            6 hours ago













          7












          7








          7





          $begingroup$


          Nxc4




          is mate because




          pawn b5 is pinned







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




          Nxc4




          is mate because




          pawn b5 is pinned








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          GlorfindelGlorfindel

          17k4 gold badges64 silver badges96 bronze badges




          17k4 gold badges64 silver badges96 bronze badges







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Beat me by about ten seconds...
            $endgroup$
            – Jeff Zeitlin
            8 hours ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            I'm pretty sure that's not right. :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Bass
            6 hours ago












          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Beat me by about ten seconds...
            $endgroup$
            – Jeff Zeitlin
            8 hours ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            I'm pretty sure that's not right. :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Bass
            6 hours ago







          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Beat me by about ten seconds...
          $endgroup$
          – Jeff Zeitlin
          8 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Beat me by about ten seconds...
          $endgroup$
          – Jeff Zeitlin
          8 hours ago




          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          I'm pretty sure that's not right. :-)
          $endgroup$
          – Bass
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          I'm pretty sure that's not right. :-)
          $endgroup$
          – Bass
          6 hours ago













          6












          $begingroup$

          To add on to Glorfindel's answer,




          ...cxd3 is also mate, assuming white just played d2 to d4. The question doesn't state if we're finding mate for white or black.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Nice spot there!
            $endgroup$
            – Rewan Demontay
            6 hours ago















          6












          $begingroup$

          To add on to Glorfindel's answer,




          ...cxd3 is also mate, assuming white just played d2 to d4. The question doesn't state if we're finding mate for white or black.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Nice spot there!
            $endgroup$
            – Rewan Demontay
            6 hours ago













          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          To add on to Glorfindel's answer,




          ...cxd3 is also mate, assuming white just played d2 to d4. The question doesn't state if we're finding mate for white or black.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          To add on to Glorfindel's answer,




          ...cxd3 is also mate, assuming white just played d2 to d4. The question doesn't state if we're finding mate for white or black.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          UsernomeUsernome

          2664 bronze badges




          2664 bronze badges











          • $begingroup$
            Nice spot there!
            $endgroup$
            – Rewan Demontay
            6 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Nice spot there!
            $endgroup$
            – Rewan Demontay
            6 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          Nice spot there!
          $endgroup$
          – Rewan Demontay
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Nice spot there!
          $endgroup$
          – Rewan Demontay
          6 hours ago











          6












          $begingroup$

          There certainly is more than meets the eye here.



          First of all,




          It cannot be white's turn: if it were, black's previous move would have been either knight takes (knight or rook) on b4 OR d-pawn takes on c1 and promotes to queen: any other move would have been made from an illegal position. In particular, the knight cannot have moved to an empty b4, because then the white bishop would have been checking the black king on white's previous move, which is illegal. In case you were wondering whether the white bishop could have captured something on c3 to give check legally, that's also impossible, since a black pawn would have needed to capture to get there, and the rest of the black pieces are still on board. But could there have been a promoted black piece there? HMMM.. Looks like this needs another chapter, because the captures made by the white pawns aren't quite trivial.




          EDITED: dig down the rabbit hole to see how far it goes:




          If there was a promoted black piece on c3, let's see which pawn it was. Black's a, b, and c-pawns are still on the board, so it wasn't any of them. White's b-pawn must have taken a promoted piece on the c-file, and black's d-pawn (or another promoted piece) to get to the d-file. White's h-pawn must have been promoted to replace the piece captured on the b-file. For this to happen, it must have captured black's g-pawn, or another promoted piece. White's g-pawn has also taken at f3.




          So we can account for




          3 black pawns on the board, d and f black pawns taken, black g pawn promoted to replace the piece white's h-pawn took, and the black h-pawn promoted and then fed to white's b-pawn on c-file. This leaves black's e-pawn. Could it somehow have gotten promoted? Or could it have sacrificed itself to clear a promotion path for another pawn? Not without some additional black pieces taken, it seems, so it must have died a meaningless death.


          All this means that there couldn't have been many enough promoted black pieces in the game in order for one of them to have been at c3.




          Back to the business, since the rabbit hole seems to have checked out:




          Now then, both of the two moves suggested (in bold) in the first spoiler block are also impossible, because they'd need to capture a piece. Because black has a doubled pawn, one white piece was necessarily taken earlier, and white has the rest of the pieces still on the board.


          Since black has no legal last move, it must be black's turn.




          Now that we have that established, we need to figure out




          what could have been white's previous move. This is tricky, since black still has very few options to account for a legal previous move.


          Any move "on the outside" leaves black without a legal previous move, and as long as the white pawn at d4 was still there, the c3 bishop must have been on the black king's diagonal, meaning that the black knight couldn't have moved either. Therefore, the previous black piece to move would have been either the queen or the pawn at b5. Since there aren't any squares the queen could have come from (even allowing for one white move afterwards), and the pawn move also proves impossible (there's no way the white rook could legally have gotten to c5 in that case) we must deduce that white's d4 pawn cannot have been there two moves ago, because black's previous move must have been with the knight, and so the white bishop cannot have been on the black king's diagonal.




          Now this is interesting, because it means the pawn was somewhere else. If it were on d3, the black knight would have nowhere to have come from,




          so white's pawn was on d2, black's knight was on d3, and white's bishop was somewhere else, like e5, for example.




          So three half-moves ago, the board must necessarily have looked something like this:




          enter image description here

          (white's dark square bishop could also be elsewhere on the long diagonal)




          From which the only way to reach the current position is





          1. Bc3+ - Nb4
          2. d4



          Which finally allows for the long sought after mate in one:




          2. - cxd3 e.p.#!




          I may have missed some specific variations, please drop a comment if you notice one. And thanks again, OP, for another brilliant puzzle!






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I figured that it would be something like this-I just couldn't quite figure it out myself.
            $endgroup$
            – Rewan Demontay
            5 hours ago















          6












          $begingroup$

          There certainly is more than meets the eye here.



          First of all,




          It cannot be white's turn: if it were, black's previous move would have been either knight takes (knight or rook) on b4 OR d-pawn takes on c1 and promotes to queen: any other move would have been made from an illegal position. In particular, the knight cannot have moved to an empty b4, because then the white bishop would have been checking the black king on white's previous move, which is illegal. In case you were wondering whether the white bishop could have captured something on c3 to give check legally, that's also impossible, since a black pawn would have needed to capture to get there, and the rest of the black pieces are still on board. But could there have been a promoted black piece there? HMMM.. Looks like this needs another chapter, because the captures made by the white pawns aren't quite trivial.




          EDITED: dig down the rabbit hole to see how far it goes:




          If there was a promoted black piece on c3, let's see which pawn it was. Black's a, b, and c-pawns are still on the board, so it wasn't any of them. White's b-pawn must have taken a promoted piece on the c-file, and black's d-pawn (or another promoted piece) to get to the d-file. White's h-pawn must have been promoted to replace the piece captured on the b-file. For this to happen, it must have captured black's g-pawn, or another promoted piece. White's g-pawn has also taken at f3.




          So we can account for




          3 black pawns on the board, d and f black pawns taken, black g pawn promoted to replace the piece white's h-pawn took, and the black h-pawn promoted and then fed to white's b-pawn on c-file. This leaves black's e-pawn. Could it somehow have gotten promoted? Or could it have sacrificed itself to clear a promotion path for another pawn? Not without some additional black pieces taken, it seems, so it must have died a meaningless death.


          All this means that there couldn't have been many enough promoted black pieces in the game in order for one of them to have been at c3.




          Back to the business, since the rabbit hole seems to have checked out:




          Now then, both of the two moves suggested (in bold) in the first spoiler block are also impossible, because they'd need to capture a piece. Because black has a doubled pawn, one white piece was necessarily taken earlier, and white has the rest of the pieces still on the board.


          Since black has no legal last move, it must be black's turn.




          Now that we have that established, we need to figure out




          what could have been white's previous move. This is tricky, since black still has very few options to account for a legal previous move.


          Any move "on the outside" leaves black without a legal previous move, and as long as the white pawn at d4 was still there, the c3 bishop must have been on the black king's diagonal, meaning that the black knight couldn't have moved either. Therefore, the previous black piece to move would have been either the queen or the pawn at b5. Since there aren't any squares the queen could have come from (even allowing for one white move afterwards), and the pawn move also proves impossible (there's no way the white rook could legally have gotten to c5 in that case) we must deduce that white's d4 pawn cannot have been there two moves ago, because black's previous move must have been with the knight, and so the white bishop cannot have been on the black king's diagonal.




          Now this is interesting, because it means the pawn was somewhere else. If it were on d3, the black knight would have nowhere to have come from,




          so white's pawn was on d2, black's knight was on d3, and white's bishop was somewhere else, like e5, for example.




          So three half-moves ago, the board must necessarily have looked something like this:




          enter image description here

          (white's dark square bishop could also be elsewhere on the long diagonal)




          From which the only way to reach the current position is





          1. Bc3+ - Nb4
          2. d4



          Which finally allows for the long sought after mate in one:




          2. - cxd3 e.p.#!




          I may have missed some specific variations, please drop a comment if you notice one. And thanks again, OP, for another brilliant puzzle!






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I figured that it would be something like this-I just couldn't quite figure it out myself.
            $endgroup$
            – Rewan Demontay
            5 hours ago













          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          There certainly is more than meets the eye here.



          First of all,




          It cannot be white's turn: if it were, black's previous move would have been either knight takes (knight or rook) on b4 OR d-pawn takes on c1 and promotes to queen: any other move would have been made from an illegal position. In particular, the knight cannot have moved to an empty b4, because then the white bishop would have been checking the black king on white's previous move, which is illegal. In case you were wondering whether the white bishop could have captured something on c3 to give check legally, that's also impossible, since a black pawn would have needed to capture to get there, and the rest of the black pieces are still on board. But could there have been a promoted black piece there? HMMM.. Looks like this needs another chapter, because the captures made by the white pawns aren't quite trivial.




          EDITED: dig down the rabbit hole to see how far it goes:




          If there was a promoted black piece on c3, let's see which pawn it was. Black's a, b, and c-pawns are still on the board, so it wasn't any of them. White's b-pawn must have taken a promoted piece on the c-file, and black's d-pawn (or another promoted piece) to get to the d-file. White's h-pawn must have been promoted to replace the piece captured on the b-file. For this to happen, it must have captured black's g-pawn, or another promoted piece. White's g-pawn has also taken at f3.




          So we can account for




          3 black pawns on the board, d and f black pawns taken, black g pawn promoted to replace the piece white's h-pawn took, and the black h-pawn promoted and then fed to white's b-pawn on c-file. This leaves black's e-pawn. Could it somehow have gotten promoted? Or could it have sacrificed itself to clear a promotion path for another pawn? Not without some additional black pieces taken, it seems, so it must have died a meaningless death.


          All this means that there couldn't have been many enough promoted black pieces in the game in order for one of them to have been at c3.




          Back to the business, since the rabbit hole seems to have checked out:




          Now then, both of the two moves suggested (in bold) in the first spoiler block are also impossible, because they'd need to capture a piece. Because black has a doubled pawn, one white piece was necessarily taken earlier, and white has the rest of the pieces still on the board.


          Since black has no legal last move, it must be black's turn.




          Now that we have that established, we need to figure out




          what could have been white's previous move. This is tricky, since black still has very few options to account for a legal previous move.


          Any move "on the outside" leaves black without a legal previous move, and as long as the white pawn at d4 was still there, the c3 bishop must have been on the black king's diagonal, meaning that the black knight couldn't have moved either. Therefore, the previous black piece to move would have been either the queen or the pawn at b5. Since there aren't any squares the queen could have come from (even allowing for one white move afterwards), and the pawn move also proves impossible (there's no way the white rook could legally have gotten to c5 in that case) we must deduce that white's d4 pawn cannot have been there two moves ago, because black's previous move must have been with the knight, and so the white bishop cannot have been on the black king's diagonal.




          Now this is interesting, because it means the pawn was somewhere else. If it were on d3, the black knight would have nowhere to have come from,




          so white's pawn was on d2, black's knight was on d3, and white's bishop was somewhere else, like e5, for example.




          So three half-moves ago, the board must necessarily have looked something like this:




          enter image description here

          (white's dark square bishop could also be elsewhere on the long diagonal)




          From which the only way to reach the current position is





          1. Bc3+ - Nb4
          2. d4



          Which finally allows for the long sought after mate in one:




          2. - cxd3 e.p.#!




          I may have missed some specific variations, please drop a comment if you notice one. And thanks again, OP, for another brilliant puzzle!






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          There certainly is more than meets the eye here.



          First of all,




          It cannot be white's turn: if it were, black's previous move would have been either knight takes (knight or rook) on b4 OR d-pawn takes on c1 and promotes to queen: any other move would have been made from an illegal position. In particular, the knight cannot have moved to an empty b4, because then the white bishop would have been checking the black king on white's previous move, which is illegal. In case you were wondering whether the white bishop could have captured something on c3 to give check legally, that's also impossible, since a black pawn would have needed to capture to get there, and the rest of the black pieces are still on board. But could there have been a promoted black piece there? HMMM.. Looks like this needs another chapter, because the captures made by the white pawns aren't quite trivial.




          EDITED: dig down the rabbit hole to see how far it goes:




          If there was a promoted black piece on c3, let's see which pawn it was. Black's a, b, and c-pawns are still on the board, so it wasn't any of them. White's b-pawn must have taken a promoted piece on the c-file, and black's d-pawn (or another promoted piece) to get to the d-file. White's h-pawn must have been promoted to replace the piece captured on the b-file. For this to happen, it must have captured black's g-pawn, or another promoted piece. White's g-pawn has also taken at f3.




          So we can account for




          3 black pawns on the board, d and f black pawns taken, black g pawn promoted to replace the piece white's h-pawn took, and the black h-pawn promoted and then fed to white's b-pawn on c-file. This leaves black's e-pawn. Could it somehow have gotten promoted? Or could it have sacrificed itself to clear a promotion path for another pawn? Not without some additional black pieces taken, it seems, so it must have died a meaningless death.


          All this means that there couldn't have been many enough promoted black pieces in the game in order for one of them to have been at c3.




          Back to the business, since the rabbit hole seems to have checked out:




          Now then, both of the two moves suggested (in bold) in the first spoiler block are also impossible, because they'd need to capture a piece. Because black has a doubled pawn, one white piece was necessarily taken earlier, and white has the rest of the pieces still on the board.


          Since black has no legal last move, it must be black's turn.




          Now that we have that established, we need to figure out




          what could have been white's previous move. This is tricky, since black still has very few options to account for a legal previous move.


          Any move "on the outside" leaves black without a legal previous move, and as long as the white pawn at d4 was still there, the c3 bishop must have been on the black king's diagonal, meaning that the black knight couldn't have moved either. Therefore, the previous black piece to move would have been either the queen or the pawn at b5. Since there aren't any squares the queen could have come from (even allowing for one white move afterwards), and the pawn move also proves impossible (there's no way the white rook could legally have gotten to c5 in that case) we must deduce that white's d4 pawn cannot have been there two moves ago, because black's previous move must have been with the knight, and so the white bishop cannot have been on the black king's diagonal.




          Now this is interesting, because it means the pawn was somewhere else. If it were on d3, the black knight would have nowhere to have come from,




          so white's pawn was on d2, black's knight was on d3, and white's bishop was somewhere else, like e5, for example.




          So three half-moves ago, the board must necessarily have looked something like this:




          enter image description here

          (white's dark square bishop could also be elsewhere on the long diagonal)




          From which the only way to reach the current position is





          1. Bc3+ - Nb4
          2. d4



          Which finally allows for the long sought after mate in one:




          2. - cxd3 e.p.#!




          I may have missed some specific variations, please drop a comment if you notice one. And thanks again, OP, for another brilliant puzzle!







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 4 hours ago

























          answered 6 hours ago









          BassBass

          33.5k4 gold badges79 silver badges198 bronze badges




          33.5k4 gold badges79 silver badges198 bronze badges











          • $begingroup$
            I figured that it would be something like this-I just couldn't quite figure it out myself.
            $endgroup$
            – Rewan Demontay
            5 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            I figured that it would be something like this-I just couldn't quite figure it out myself.
            $endgroup$
            – Rewan Demontay
            5 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          I figured that it would be something like this-I just couldn't quite figure it out myself.
          $endgroup$
          – Rewan Demontay
          5 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          I figured that it would be something like this-I just couldn't quite figure it out myself.
          $endgroup$
          – Rewan Demontay
          5 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f85541%2fcheckmate-in-1-on-a-tangled-board%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單