Can a black dragonborn's acid breath weapon destroy objects?How should damage thresholds be assigned?Does a damage threshold reduce damage larger than the threshold?Shatter spell versus mundane weapons and armorHow do I keep spellcasters from casting while in jail?How can I make Westley from The Princess Bride in D&D 5e?What is the source of the “spells do only what they say they do” rules interpretation principle?How does Counterspell work and can it be used on Silence?How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?Dragon's Breath Spell with Empowered EvocationWhen can you counterspell a spell with long casting time?If one is sure that he is perceiving an illusion, having not interacted with or investigated it, can he see, hear, etc. through it?Is this change to the Two-Weapon Fighting fighting style balanced?Would increasing a Dragonborn's breath weapon damage help to balance them?

No array bounds check when using auto

What makes Ada the language of choice for the ISS's safety-critical systems?

Trim MP4 video downloaded from YouTube in Keynote

What was with Miles Morales's stickers?

How to build suspense or so to establish and justify xenophobia of characters in the eyes of the reader?

Did the ending really happen in Baby Driver?

How to chain Python function calls so the behaviour is as follows

Why does the Schrödinger equation work so well for the hydrogen atom despite the relativistic boundary at the nucleus?

Are "living" organ banks practical?

Indirectly defined macros: Undefined macro with "@" does not trigger compile error

How can drunken, homicidal elves successfully conduct a wild hunt?

How does an ordinary object become radioactive?

What is the giant octopus in the torture chamber for?

How do governments keep track of their issued currency?

What language is the software written in on the ISS?

Why don’t airliners have temporary liveries?

What risks are there when you clear your cookies instead of logging off?

At what point in time did Dumbledore ask Snape to do this thing?

How does a transformer increase voltage while decreasing the current?

Does an ice chest packed full of frozen food need ice?

Avoiding cliches when writing gods

How water is heavier than petrol eventhough its molecular weight less than petrol?

Is using haveibeenpwned to validate password strength rational?

Subfigures with pgfplots



Can a black dragonborn's acid breath weapon destroy objects?


How should damage thresholds be assigned?Does a damage threshold reduce damage larger than the threshold?Shatter spell versus mundane weapons and armorHow do I keep spellcasters from casting while in jail?How can I make Westley from The Princess Bride in D&D 5e?What is the source of the “spells do only what they say they do” rules interpretation principle?How does Counterspell work and can it be used on Silence?How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?Dragon's Breath Spell with Empowered EvocationWhen can you counterspell a spell with long casting time?If one is sure that he is perceiving an illusion, having not interacted with or investigated it, can he see, hear, etc. through it?Is this change to the Two-Weapon Fighting fighting style balanced?Would increasing a Dragonborn's breath weapon damage help to balance them?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








8












$begingroup$


For example, is a Black Dragonborn able to use its Breath Weapon, in this case, of acid type, to corrode walls, doors, objects, etc?



I'm asking this because when it comes to spells, they don't affect the environment unless it is specifically said so.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is a related question here Also, are you asking as the DM or as the player? This is also related. Likewise this one
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    9 hours ago


















8












$begingroup$


For example, is a Black Dragonborn able to use its Breath Weapon, in this case, of acid type, to corrode walls, doors, objects, etc?



I'm asking this because when it comes to spells, they don't affect the environment unless it is specifically said so.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is a related question here Also, are you asking as the DM or as the player? This is also related. Likewise this one
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    9 hours ago














8












8








8





$begingroup$


For example, is a Black Dragonborn able to use its Breath Weapon, in this case, of acid type, to corrode walls, doors, objects, etc?



I'm asking this because when it comes to spells, they don't affect the environment unless it is specifically said so.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




For example, is a Black Dragonborn able to use its Breath Weapon, in this case, of acid type, to corrode walls, doors, objects, etc?



I'm asking this because when it comes to spells, they don't affect the environment unless it is specifically said so.







dnd-5e dragonborn objects breath-weapon






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 52 mins ago









V2Blast

30.1k5110183




30.1k5110183










asked 9 hours ago









EducorreiaEducorreia

535




535







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is a related question here Also, are you asking as the DM or as the player? This is also related. Likewise this one
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    9 hours ago













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is a related question here Also, are you asking as the DM or as the player? This is also related. Likewise this one
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    9 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
There is a related question here Also, are you asking as the DM or as the player? This is also related. Likewise this one
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
9 hours ago





$begingroup$
There is a related question here Also, are you asking as the DM or as the player? This is also related. Likewise this one
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
9 hours ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

RAW - No, it only affects creatures



The Dragonborn race feature breath weapon is specific in what things it damages (my emphasis):




When you use your breath weapon, each creature in the area of the exhalation




There is no language in this that suggests it would affect objects. You can compare this against spells like fireball which state:




It ignites flammable objects in the area that aren't being worn or carried.




Also note that the spell dragon's breath contains the same limitation as the breath weapon for the race with no allowance for object damage.



But what if?



The problem with allowing it is you've now increased the ability of the feature, and possibly of the similar spell effect that emulates the racial ability. Is it always on like fireball? Do they get to choose? Allowing this as a creative use will be up to a DM to determine, but doing so may raise questions rather than solve problems.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    9












    $begingroup$

    The Dragonborn's Breath Weapon has similar verbiage:




    When you use your breath weapon, each creature in the area of the exhalation must make a saving throw, the type of which is determined by your draconic ancestry. ...[snip]... A creature takes 2d6 damage on a failed save, and half as much damage on a successful one.




    Per a strict reading of RAW, the Dragonborn's Breath Weapon does NOT deal damage to objects.




    Rules as Fun/Common Sense, however differ, in this DM's humble opinion. If a Dragonborn in my game wants to use their 1/rest resource to target and damage an/some object, then so-be-it. I wouldn't allow it to be used to damage attended/worn objects and it wouldn't change how spells interact with objects.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      -2












      $begingroup$

      As written, it wouldn't. This could be justified by a DM by saying that the type of acid only affects living matter.



      As intended, I also believe it would not; they never intended it to have such additional uses.



      As a DM, I would almost for sure house-rule that it does; it can add some fun RP and out of combat uses. Like a red dragon born using the breadth to start a campfire. Perhaps the acid being used to slowly eat through a lock. Mechanically not really any benefit over say dealing damage to the lock multiple times with a rock, but kind of fun thematically.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor



      Jason Clark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      $endgroup$








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Hey Jason! Welcome to RPG.se! Please take our tour to learn about how we work. Specifically we require answers to be backed up with evidence like book quotes or references to the rules or personal experience to support your points. If you could add those to your answer it would improve it a lot. See this post for the kinds of support we expect to see in answers.
        $endgroup$
        – Rubiksmoose
        5 hours ago







      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Also, specifically if you claim that something is or is not intended, you should cite that. It is incredibly easy for someone to say that they believe that it is intended to be one way and equally as easy for someone else to believe the opposite. Without evidence, what someone believes to be intended is not helpful at all. Please edit your answer to improve these aspects! Thanks for contributing and I hope to see you around!
        $endgroup$
        – Rubiksmoose
        5 hours ago












      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "122"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f149191%2fcan-a-black-dragonborns-acid-breath-weapon-destroy-objects%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      7












      $begingroup$

      RAW - No, it only affects creatures



      The Dragonborn race feature breath weapon is specific in what things it damages (my emphasis):




      When you use your breath weapon, each creature in the area of the exhalation




      There is no language in this that suggests it would affect objects. You can compare this against spells like fireball which state:




      It ignites flammable objects in the area that aren't being worn or carried.




      Also note that the spell dragon's breath contains the same limitation as the breath weapon for the race with no allowance for object damage.



      But what if?



      The problem with allowing it is you've now increased the ability of the feature, and possibly of the similar spell effect that emulates the racial ability. Is it always on like fireball? Do they get to choose? Allowing this as a creative use will be up to a DM to determine, but doing so may raise questions rather than solve problems.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        7












        $begingroup$

        RAW - No, it only affects creatures



        The Dragonborn race feature breath weapon is specific in what things it damages (my emphasis):




        When you use your breath weapon, each creature in the area of the exhalation




        There is no language in this that suggests it would affect objects. You can compare this against spells like fireball which state:




        It ignites flammable objects in the area that aren't being worn or carried.




        Also note that the spell dragon's breath contains the same limitation as the breath weapon for the race with no allowance for object damage.



        But what if?



        The problem with allowing it is you've now increased the ability of the feature, and possibly of the similar spell effect that emulates the racial ability. Is it always on like fireball? Do they get to choose? Allowing this as a creative use will be up to a DM to determine, but doing so may raise questions rather than solve problems.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          7












          7








          7





          $begingroup$

          RAW - No, it only affects creatures



          The Dragonborn race feature breath weapon is specific in what things it damages (my emphasis):




          When you use your breath weapon, each creature in the area of the exhalation




          There is no language in this that suggests it would affect objects. You can compare this against spells like fireball which state:




          It ignites flammable objects in the area that aren't being worn or carried.




          Also note that the spell dragon's breath contains the same limitation as the breath weapon for the race with no allowance for object damage.



          But what if?



          The problem with allowing it is you've now increased the ability of the feature, and possibly of the similar spell effect that emulates the racial ability. Is it always on like fireball? Do they get to choose? Allowing this as a creative use will be up to a DM to determine, but doing so may raise questions rather than solve problems.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          RAW - No, it only affects creatures



          The Dragonborn race feature breath weapon is specific in what things it damages (my emphasis):




          When you use your breath weapon, each creature in the area of the exhalation




          There is no language in this that suggests it would affect objects. You can compare this against spells like fireball which state:




          It ignites flammable objects in the area that aren't being worn or carried.




          Also note that the spell dragon's breath contains the same limitation as the breath weapon for the race with no allowance for object damage.



          But what if?



          The problem with allowing it is you've now increased the ability of the feature, and possibly of the similar spell effect that emulates the racial ability. Is it always on like fireball? Do they get to choose? Allowing this as a creative use will be up to a DM to determine, but doing so may raise questions rather than solve problems.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 51 mins ago









          V2Blast

          30.1k5110183




          30.1k5110183










          answered 8 hours ago









          NautArchNautArch

          68.1k11261457




          68.1k11261457























              9












              $begingroup$

              The Dragonborn's Breath Weapon has similar verbiage:




              When you use your breath weapon, each creature in the area of the exhalation must make a saving throw, the type of which is determined by your draconic ancestry. ...[snip]... A creature takes 2d6 damage on a failed save, and half as much damage on a successful one.




              Per a strict reading of RAW, the Dragonborn's Breath Weapon does NOT deal damage to objects.




              Rules as Fun/Common Sense, however differ, in this DM's humble opinion. If a Dragonborn in my game wants to use their 1/rest resource to target and damage an/some object, then so-be-it. I wouldn't allow it to be used to damage attended/worn objects and it wouldn't change how spells interact with objects.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                9












                $begingroup$

                The Dragonborn's Breath Weapon has similar verbiage:




                When you use your breath weapon, each creature in the area of the exhalation must make a saving throw, the type of which is determined by your draconic ancestry. ...[snip]... A creature takes 2d6 damage on a failed save, and half as much damage on a successful one.




                Per a strict reading of RAW, the Dragonborn's Breath Weapon does NOT deal damage to objects.




                Rules as Fun/Common Sense, however differ, in this DM's humble opinion. If a Dragonborn in my game wants to use their 1/rest resource to target and damage an/some object, then so-be-it. I wouldn't allow it to be used to damage attended/worn objects and it wouldn't change how spells interact with objects.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  9












                  9








                  9





                  $begingroup$

                  The Dragonborn's Breath Weapon has similar verbiage:




                  When you use your breath weapon, each creature in the area of the exhalation must make a saving throw, the type of which is determined by your draconic ancestry. ...[snip]... A creature takes 2d6 damage on a failed save, and half as much damage on a successful one.




                  Per a strict reading of RAW, the Dragonborn's Breath Weapon does NOT deal damage to objects.




                  Rules as Fun/Common Sense, however differ, in this DM's humble opinion. If a Dragonborn in my game wants to use their 1/rest resource to target and damage an/some object, then so-be-it. I wouldn't allow it to be used to damage attended/worn objects and it wouldn't change how spells interact with objects.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  The Dragonborn's Breath Weapon has similar verbiage:




                  When you use your breath weapon, each creature in the area of the exhalation must make a saving throw, the type of which is determined by your draconic ancestry. ...[snip]... A creature takes 2d6 damage on a failed save, and half as much damage on a successful one.




                  Per a strict reading of RAW, the Dragonborn's Breath Weapon does NOT deal damage to objects.




                  Rules as Fun/Common Sense, however differ, in this DM's humble opinion. If a Dragonborn in my game wants to use their 1/rest resource to target and damage an/some object, then so-be-it. I wouldn't allow it to be used to damage attended/worn objects and it wouldn't change how spells interact with objects.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 8 hours ago

























                  answered 8 hours ago









                  goodguy5goodguy5

                  10.7k23883




                  10.7k23883





















                      -2












                      $begingroup$

                      As written, it wouldn't. This could be justified by a DM by saying that the type of acid only affects living matter.



                      As intended, I also believe it would not; they never intended it to have such additional uses.



                      As a DM, I would almost for sure house-rule that it does; it can add some fun RP and out of combat uses. Like a red dragon born using the breadth to start a campfire. Perhaps the acid being used to slowly eat through a lock. Mechanically not really any benefit over say dealing damage to the lock multiple times with a rock, but kind of fun thematically.






                      share|improve this answer










                      New contributor



                      Jason Clark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      $endgroup$








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Hey Jason! Welcome to RPG.se! Please take our tour to learn about how we work. Specifically we require answers to be backed up with evidence like book quotes or references to the rules or personal experience to support your points. If you could add those to your answer it would improve it a lot. See this post for the kinds of support we expect to see in answers.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rubiksmoose
                        5 hours ago







                      • 3




                        $begingroup$
                        Also, specifically if you claim that something is or is not intended, you should cite that. It is incredibly easy for someone to say that they believe that it is intended to be one way and equally as easy for someone else to believe the opposite. Without evidence, what someone believes to be intended is not helpful at all. Please edit your answer to improve these aspects! Thanks for contributing and I hope to see you around!
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rubiksmoose
                        5 hours ago
















                      -2












                      $begingroup$

                      As written, it wouldn't. This could be justified by a DM by saying that the type of acid only affects living matter.



                      As intended, I also believe it would not; they never intended it to have such additional uses.



                      As a DM, I would almost for sure house-rule that it does; it can add some fun RP and out of combat uses. Like a red dragon born using the breadth to start a campfire. Perhaps the acid being used to slowly eat through a lock. Mechanically not really any benefit over say dealing damage to the lock multiple times with a rock, but kind of fun thematically.






                      share|improve this answer










                      New contributor



                      Jason Clark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      $endgroup$








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Hey Jason! Welcome to RPG.se! Please take our tour to learn about how we work. Specifically we require answers to be backed up with evidence like book quotes or references to the rules or personal experience to support your points. If you could add those to your answer it would improve it a lot. See this post for the kinds of support we expect to see in answers.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rubiksmoose
                        5 hours ago







                      • 3




                        $begingroup$
                        Also, specifically if you claim that something is or is not intended, you should cite that. It is incredibly easy for someone to say that they believe that it is intended to be one way and equally as easy for someone else to believe the opposite. Without evidence, what someone believes to be intended is not helpful at all. Please edit your answer to improve these aspects! Thanks for contributing and I hope to see you around!
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rubiksmoose
                        5 hours ago














                      -2












                      -2








                      -2





                      $begingroup$

                      As written, it wouldn't. This could be justified by a DM by saying that the type of acid only affects living matter.



                      As intended, I also believe it would not; they never intended it to have such additional uses.



                      As a DM, I would almost for sure house-rule that it does; it can add some fun RP and out of combat uses. Like a red dragon born using the breadth to start a campfire. Perhaps the acid being used to slowly eat through a lock. Mechanically not really any benefit over say dealing damage to the lock multiple times with a rock, but kind of fun thematically.






                      share|improve this answer










                      New contributor



                      Jason Clark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      $endgroup$



                      As written, it wouldn't. This could be justified by a DM by saying that the type of acid only affects living matter.



                      As intended, I also believe it would not; they never intended it to have such additional uses.



                      As a DM, I would almost for sure house-rule that it does; it can add some fun RP and out of combat uses. Like a red dragon born using the breadth to start a campfire. Perhaps the acid being used to slowly eat through a lock. Mechanically not really any benefit over say dealing damage to the lock multiple times with a rock, but kind of fun thematically.







                      share|improve this answer










                      New contributor



                      Jason Clark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.








                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 50 mins ago









                      V2Blast

                      30.1k5110183




                      30.1k5110183






                      New contributor



                      Jason Clark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.








                      answered 5 hours ago









                      Jason ClarkJason Clark

                      1




                      1




                      New contributor



                      Jason Clark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.




                      New contributor




                      Jason Clark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Hey Jason! Welcome to RPG.se! Please take our tour to learn about how we work. Specifically we require answers to be backed up with evidence like book quotes or references to the rules or personal experience to support your points. If you could add those to your answer it would improve it a lot. See this post for the kinds of support we expect to see in answers.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rubiksmoose
                        5 hours ago







                      • 3




                        $begingroup$
                        Also, specifically if you claim that something is or is not intended, you should cite that. It is incredibly easy for someone to say that they believe that it is intended to be one way and equally as easy for someone else to believe the opposite. Without evidence, what someone believes to be intended is not helpful at all. Please edit your answer to improve these aspects! Thanks for contributing and I hope to see you around!
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rubiksmoose
                        5 hours ago













                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Hey Jason! Welcome to RPG.se! Please take our tour to learn about how we work. Specifically we require answers to be backed up with evidence like book quotes or references to the rules or personal experience to support your points. If you could add those to your answer it would improve it a lot. See this post for the kinds of support we expect to see in answers.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rubiksmoose
                        5 hours ago







                      • 3




                        $begingroup$
                        Also, specifically if you claim that something is or is not intended, you should cite that. It is incredibly easy for someone to say that they believe that it is intended to be one way and equally as easy for someone else to believe the opposite. Without evidence, what someone believes to be intended is not helpful at all. Please edit your answer to improve these aspects! Thanks for contributing and I hope to see you around!
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rubiksmoose
                        5 hours ago








                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      Hey Jason! Welcome to RPG.se! Please take our tour to learn about how we work. Specifically we require answers to be backed up with evidence like book quotes or references to the rules or personal experience to support your points. If you could add those to your answer it would improve it a lot. See this post for the kinds of support we expect to see in answers.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rubiksmoose
                      5 hours ago





                      $begingroup$
                      Hey Jason! Welcome to RPG.se! Please take our tour to learn about how we work. Specifically we require answers to be backed up with evidence like book quotes or references to the rules or personal experience to support your points. If you could add those to your answer it would improve it a lot. See this post for the kinds of support we expect to see in answers.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rubiksmoose
                      5 hours ago





                      3




                      3




                      $begingroup$
                      Also, specifically if you claim that something is or is not intended, you should cite that. It is incredibly easy for someone to say that they believe that it is intended to be one way and equally as easy for someone else to believe the opposite. Without evidence, what someone believes to be intended is not helpful at all. Please edit your answer to improve these aspects! Thanks for contributing and I hope to see you around!
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rubiksmoose
                      5 hours ago





                      $begingroup$
                      Also, specifically if you claim that something is or is not intended, you should cite that. It is incredibly easy for someone to say that they believe that it is intended to be one way and equally as easy for someone else to believe the opposite. Without evidence, what someone believes to be intended is not helpful at all. Please edit your answer to improve these aspects! Thanks for contributing and I hope to see you around!
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rubiksmoose
                      5 hours ago


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f149191%2fcan-a-black-dragonborns-acid-breath-weapon-destroy-objects%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480