What ways have you found to get edits from non-LaTeX users?
Frame failure sudden death?
PhD - Well known professor or well known school?
Where does "0 packages can be updated." come from?
How can drunken, homicidal elves successfully conduct a wild hunt?
How to retract an idea already pitched to an employer?
Find the Factorial From the Given Prime Relationship
Chemmacros scheme translation
How Can I Tell The Difference Between Unmarked Sugar and Stevia?
What are the peak hours for public transportation in Paris?
Which comes first? Multiple Imputation, Splitting into train/test, or Standardization/Normalization
How to tell your grandparent to not come to fetch you with their car?
What could have caused a rear derailleur to end up in the back wheel suddenly?
Preventing Employees from either switching to Competitors or Opening Their Own Business
How to return a security deposit to a tenant
How can I most clearly write a homebrew item that affects the ground below its radius after the initial explosion it creates?
Should I give professor gift at the beginning of my PhD?
Should an arbiter claim draw at a K+R vs K+R endgame?
What is the `some` keyword in SwiftUI
Soft question: Examples where lack of mathematical rigour cause security breaches?
Does an ice chest packed full of frozen food need ice?
Movie about a boy who was born old and grew young
Why was the Sega Genesis marketed as a 16-bit console?
Why only the fundamental frequency component is said to give useful power?
What's up with this leaf?
What ways have you found to get edits from non-LaTeX users?
I sometimes need to get edits to my papers from non-LaTeX users. Do you have any clever methods of collaborating with them (or even other LaTeX users) in a productive way?
By this I mean sharing edits. So I have a document I've written in LaTeX, and they want to edit it, correct spelling and grammar, suggest additions, and so on.
big-list
add a comment |
I sometimes need to get edits to my papers from non-LaTeX users. Do you have any clever methods of collaborating with them (or even other LaTeX users) in a productive way?
By this I mean sharing edits. So I have a document I've written in LaTeX, and they want to edit it, correct spelling and grammar, suggest additions, and so on.
big-list
add a comment |
I sometimes need to get edits to my papers from non-LaTeX users. Do you have any clever methods of collaborating with them (or even other LaTeX users) in a productive way?
By this I mean sharing edits. So I have a document I've written in LaTeX, and they want to edit it, correct spelling and grammar, suggest additions, and so on.
big-list
I sometimes need to get edits to my papers from non-LaTeX users. Do you have any clever methods of collaborating with them (or even other LaTeX users) in a productive way?
By this I mean sharing edits. So I have a document I've written in LaTeX, and they want to edit it, correct spelling and grammar, suggest additions, and so on.
big-list
big-list
edited 5 hours ago
Canageek
asked 8 hours ago
CanageekCanageek
8,32184595
8,32184595
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
(Disclaimer: I currently am part of Overleaf's support staff)
For none-LaTeX users one might try to use Overleaf's rich text mode, which should be quite easy to use for standard formattings.
Also the comment and track changes features of Overleaf can be very handy to get input from others (if it's just reviewing tasks).
add a comment |
Having been asked to provide comments on quite a few documents to which I would not have access to the original, I have adopted the following method:
Request the file in pdf form; it must have either clear page numbers or line numbers (or both).
Reading through the pdf file on screen, open a text file and enter comments in the form
p.n, col.n, para.n, l.n -- "text being commented on", <comment>
If a commented item spans more than one page, column, line, then "pp.", "cols.", "ll." is specified. An extensive text can be specified as "XX ... YY", as long as the extent of the text is unambiguous.Return the comment file by email.
The result has never been questioned, except when I've inadvertently misidentified something. The method has been used for comments on The TeXbook, articles for publication (not for TUGboat, where I do have access to the source), and several books whose sources have been in (La)TeX, Word, or gosh knows what else. It's maybe more verbose than other methods, but it has the virtue of not being able to foul up the original, which is always appreciated.
I loved that "gosh"! +1. By the way, I do not agree with your answer: actually there are more sofisticated ways to comment a file instead of txt files.
– manooooh
31 mins ago
add a comment |
Convert the LaTeX document to Word, send them that. I use https://online2pdf.com which does a decent job, if there aren't too many figures or strange formatting. However, it involves sending my files to an unknown party that could be archiving them, selling the data, etc. It also often screws up formatting pretty hard, and can take up to an hour to fix that, and once or twice I've just given up. On the plus side, I've never encountered another Track Changes feature as good as Words, as it tracks character by character instead of just highlighting the whole line like diff. Plus changes in font size and whatnot mean you get hypenated words in the middle of paragraphs. Still the most ideal option a lot of the time. This is what I use with a lot of collaborators.
Have them print it out and edit it with a pen. Not exactly environmentally friendly, but I know a lot of people who will do this anyway, even if given a word doc with track changes on. However, my girlfriend doesn't own a printer. This is what I use with my boss.
Have them edit the TeX file even if they don't know LaTeX. I don't get why so many people oppose this, it isn't like the body text has much formatting in it, but they rarely will try this. Reading raw TeX is kinda a pain though, as it isn't formatted for the human eye, and I put one sentence per line, which makes it harder to read.
Send the PDF output to my collaborators and have them add sticky notes using PDF annotations. Viewers supporting creation of sticky notes include Adobe Reader, Foxit Reader, and Okular. Many other viewers support showing sticky notes, like Evince.
2
“I've never encountered another Track Changes feature as good as Word's”git diff -w --word-diff
– Henri Menke
7 hours ago
1
@Canageek Since you intend this to be a big list, it might be better to split each of your sub-answers as a separate answers. This would give a better sense of which methods people use or like best.
– Alan Munn
7 hours ago
add a comment |
When I'm working with other TeX users I tend to use git
for collaboration if they are used to working with it. If they are not used to working with git
they will be afterwards :)
2
The question is “What ways have you found to get edits from non-LaTeX users?”
– Henri Menke
6 hours ago
2
@HenriMenke and includes the fatal statement "or even other LaTeX users".
– Skillmon
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Frankly I do not understand the purpose of this question. If this is a collaboration on contents, one can just share the information in whatever format is convenient, e.g. emails, data files, pdf files, ascii text. Once you wrap up you need to agree on the document preparation system. From the question I infer that this will be LaTeX.
Of course, if the question is how to jointly grow a document that has cross links, references and so on, then IMHO there is no other way than recommending them to quickly look at a LaTeX intro. They will have to know how to label an equation that they want to refer to later. If you prepared the basic document well, i.e. just use some standard class, basic packages and avoid introducing too many self-written macros, they will be able to focus on the contents and add some text here and there. Just make sure that no one introduces glorious definitions as for instance defaalpha
. Also tell them that adding references by hand is not an option.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494059%2fwhat-ways-have-you-found-to-get-edits-from-non-latex-users%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
(Disclaimer: I currently am part of Overleaf's support staff)
For none-LaTeX users one might try to use Overleaf's rich text mode, which should be quite easy to use for standard formattings.
Also the comment and track changes features of Overleaf can be very handy to get input from others (if it's just reviewing tasks).
add a comment |
(Disclaimer: I currently am part of Overleaf's support staff)
For none-LaTeX users one might try to use Overleaf's rich text mode, which should be quite easy to use for standard formattings.
Also the comment and track changes features of Overleaf can be very handy to get input from others (if it's just reviewing tasks).
add a comment |
(Disclaimer: I currently am part of Overleaf's support staff)
For none-LaTeX users one might try to use Overleaf's rich text mode, which should be quite easy to use for standard formattings.
Also the comment and track changes features of Overleaf can be very handy to get input from others (if it's just reviewing tasks).
(Disclaimer: I currently am part of Overleaf's support staff)
For none-LaTeX users one might try to use Overleaf's rich text mode, which should be quite easy to use for standard formattings.
Also the comment and track changes features of Overleaf can be very handy to get input from others (if it's just reviewing tasks).
answered 7 hours ago
SkillmonSkillmon
25.1k12451
25.1k12451
add a comment |
add a comment |
Having been asked to provide comments on quite a few documents to which I would not have access to the original, I have adopted the following method:
Request the file in pdf form; it must have either clear page numbers or line numbers (or both).
Reading through the pdf file on screen, open a text file and enter comments in the form
p.n, col.n, para.n, l.n -- "text being commented on", <comment>
If a commented item spans more than one page, column, line, then "pp.", "cols.", "ll." is specified. An extensive text can be specified as "XX ... YY", as long as the extent of the text is unambiguous.Return the comment file by email.
The result has never been questioned, except when I've inadvertently misidentified something. The method has been used for comments on The TeXbook, articles for publication (not for TUGboat, where I do have access to the source), and several books whose sources have been in (La)TeX, Word, or gosh knows what else. It's maybe more verbose than other methods, but it has the virtue of not being able to foul up the original, which is always appreciated.
I loved that "gosh"! +1. By the way, I do not agree with your answer: actually there are more sofisticated ways to comment a file instead of txt files.
– manooooh
31 mins ago
add a comment |
Having been asked to provide comments on quite a few documents to which I would not have access to the original, I have adopted the following method:
Request the file in pdf form; it must have either clear page numbers or line numbers (or both).
Reading through the pdf file on screen, open a text file and enter comments in the form
p.n, col.n, para.n, l.n -- "text being commented on", <comment>
If a commented item spans more than one page, column, line, then "pp.", "cols.", "ll." is specified. An extensive text can be specified as "XX ... YY", as long as the extent of the text is unambiguous.Return the comment file by email.
The result has never been questioned, except when I've inadvertently misidentified something. The method has been used for comments on The TeXbook, articles for publication (not for TUGboat, where I do have access to the source), and several books whose sources have been in (La)TeX, Word, or gosh knows what else. It's maybe more verbose than other methods, but it has the virtue of not being able to foul up the original, which is always appreciated.
I loved that "gosh"! +1. By the way, I do not agree with your answer: actually there are more sofisticated ways to comment a file instead of txt files.
– manooooh
31 mins ago
add a comment |
Having been asked to provide comments on quite a few documents to which I would not have access to the original, I have adopted the following method:
Request the file in pdf form; it must have either clear page numbers or line numbers (or both).
Reading through the pdf file on screen, open a text file and enter comments in the form
p.n, col.n, para.n, l.n -- "text being commented on", <comment>
If a commented item spans more than one page, column, line, then "pp.", "cols.", "ll." is specified. An extensive text can be specified as "XX ... YY", as long as the extent of the text is unambiguous.Return the comment file by email.
The result has never been questioned, except when I've inadvertently misidentified something. The method has been used for comments on The TeXbook, articles for publication (not for TUGboat, where I do have access to the source), and several books whose sources have been in (La)TeX, Word, or gosh knows what else. It's maybe more verbose than other methods, but it has the virtue of not being able to foul up the original, which is always appreciated.
Having been asked to provide comments on quite a few documents to which I would not have access to the original, I have adopted the following method:
Request the file in pdf form; it must have either clear page numbers or line numbers (or both).
Reading through the pdf file on screen, open a text file and enter comments in the form
p.n, col.n, para.n, l.n -- "text being commented on", <comment>
If a commented item spans more than one page, column, line, then "pp.", "cols.", "ll." is specified. An extensive text can be specified as "XX ... YY", as long as the extent of the text is unambiguous.Return the comment file by email.
The result has never been questioned, except when I've inadvertently misidentified something. The method has been used for comments on The TeXbook, articles for publication (not for TUGboat, where I do have access to the source), and several books whose sources have been in (La)TeX, Word, or gosh knows what else. It's maybe more verbose than other methods, but it has the virtue of not being able to foul up the original, which is always appreciated.
answered 4 hours ago
barbara beetonbarbara beeton
71k9164388
71k9164388
I loved that "gosh"! +1. By the way, I do not agree with your answer: actually there are more sofisticated ways to comment a file instead of txt files.
– manooooh
31 mins ago
add a comment |
I loved that "gosh"! +1. By the way, I do not agree with your answer: actually there are more sofisticated ways to comment a file instead of txt files.
– manooooh
31 mins ago
I loved that "gosh"! +1. By the way, I do not agree with your answer: actually there are more sofisticated ways to comment a file instead of txt files.
– manooooh
31 mins ago
I loved that "gosh"! +1. By the way, I do not agree with your answer: actually there are more sofisticated ways to comment a file instead of txt files.
– manooooh
31 mins ago
add a comment |
Convert the LaTeX document to Word, send them that. I use https://online2pdf.com which does a decent job, if there aren't too many figures or strange formatting. However, it involves sending my files to an unknown party that could be archiving them, selling the data, etc. It also often screws up formatting pretty hard, and can take up to an hour to fix that, and once or twice I've just given up. On the plus side, I've never encountered another Track Changes feature as good as Words, as it tracks character by character instead of just highlighting the whole line like diff. Plus changes in font size and whatnot mean you get hypenated words in the middle of paragraphs. Still the most ideal option a lot of the time. This is what I use with a lot of collaborators.
Have them print it out and edit it with a pen. Not exactly environmentally friendly, but I know a lot of people who will do this anyway, even if given a word doc with track changes on. However, my girlfriend doesn't own a printer. This is what I use with my boss.
Have them edit the TeX file even if they don't know LaTeX. I don't get why so many people oppose this, it isn't like the body text has much formatting in it, but they rarely will try this. Reading raw TeX is kinda a pain though, as it isn't formatted for the human eye, and I put one sentence per line, which makes it harder to read.
Send the PDF output to my collaborators and have them add sticky notes using PDF annotations. Viewers supporting creation of sticky notes include Adobe Reader, Foxit Reader, and Okular. Many other viewers support showing sticky notes, like Evince.
2
“I've never encountered another Track Changes feature as good as Word's”git diff -w --word-diff
– Henri Menke
7 hours ago
1
@Canageek Since you intend this to be a big list, it might be better to split each of your sub-answers as a separate answers. This would give a better sense of which methods people use or like best.
– Alan Munn
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Convert the LaTeX document to Word, send them that. I use https://online2pdf.com which does a decent job, if there aren't too many figures or strange formatting. However, it involves sending my files to an unknown party that could be archiving them, selling the data, etc. It also often screws up formatting pretty hard, and can take up to an hour to fix that, and once or twice I've just given up. On the plus side, I've never encountered another Track Changes feature as good as Words, as it tracks character by character instead of just highlighting the whole line like diff. Plus changes in font size and whatnot mean you get hypenated words in the middle of paragraphs. Still the most ideal option a lot of the time. This is what I use with a lot of collaborators.
Have them print it out and edit it with a pen. Not exactly environmentally friendly, but I know a lot of people who will do this anyway, even if given a word doc with track changes on. However, my girlfriend doesn't own a printer. This is what I use with my boss.
Have them edit the TeX file even if they don't know LaTeX. I don't get why so many people oppose this, it isn't like the body text has much formatting in it, but they rarely will try this. Reading raw TeX is kinda a pain though, as it isn't formatted for the human eye, and I put one sentence per line, which makes it harder to read.
Send the PDF output to my collaborators and have them add sticky notes using PDF annotations. Viewers supporting creation of sticky notes include Adobe Reader, Foxit Reader, and Okular. Many other viewers support showing sticky notes, like Evince.
2
“I've never encountered another Track Changes feature as good as Word's”git diff -w --word-diff
– Henri Menke
7 hours ago
1
@Canageek Since you intend this to be a big list, it might be better to split each of your sub-answers as a separate answers. This would give a better sense of which methods people use or like best.
– Alan Munn
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Convert the LaTeX document to Word, send them that. I use https://online2pdf.com which does a decent job, if there aren't too many figures or strange formatting. However, it involves sending my files to an unknown party that could be archiving them, selling the data, etc. It also often screws up formatting pretty hard, and can take up to an hour to fix that, and once or twice I've just given up. On the plus side, I've never encountered another Track Changes feature as good as Words, as it tracks character by character instead of just highlighting the whole line like diff. Plus changes in font size and whatnot mean you get hypenated words in the middle of paragraphs. Still the most ideal option a lot of the time. This is what I use with a lot of collaborators.
Have them print it out and edit it with a pen. Not exactly environmentally friendly, but I know a lot of people who will do this anyway, even if given a word doc with track changes on. However, my girlfriend doesn't own a printer. This is what I use with my boss.
Have them edit the TeX file even if they don't know LaTeX. I don't get why so many people oppose this, it isn't like the body text has much formatting in it, but they rarely will try this. Reading raw TeX is kinda a pain though, as it isn't formatted for the human eye, and I put one sentence per line, which makes it harder to read.
Send the PDF output to my collaborators and have them add sticky notes using PDF annotations. Viewers supporting creation of sticky notes include Adobe Reader, Foxit Reader, and Okular. Many other viewers support showing sticky notes, like Evince.
Convert the LaTeX document to Word, send them that. I use https://online2pdf.com which does a decent job, if there aren't too many figures or strange formatting. However, it involves sending my files to an unknown party that could be archiving them, selling the data, etc. It also often screws up formatting pretty hard, and can take up to an hour to fix that, and once or twice I've just given up. On the plus side, I've never encountered another Track Changes feature as good as Words, as it tracks character by character instead of just highlighting the whole line like diff. Plus changes in font size and whatnot mean you get hypenated words in the middle of paragraphs. Still the most ideal option a lot of the time. This is what I use with a lot of collaborators.
Have them print it out and edit it with a pen. Not exactly environmentally friendly, but I know a lot of people who will do this anyway, even if given a word doc with track changes on. However, my girlfriend doesn't own a printer. This is what I use with my boss.
Have them edit the TeX file even if they don't know LaTeX. I don't get why so many people oppose this, it isn't like the body text has much formatting in it, but they rarely will try this. Reading raw TeX is kinda a pain though, as it isn't formatted for the human eye, and I put one sentence per line, which makes it harder to read.
Send the PDF output to my collaborators and have them add sticky notes using PDF annotations. Viewers supporting creation of sticky notes include Adobe Reader, Foxit Reader, and Okular. Many other viewers support showing sticky notes, like Evince.
edited 7 hours ago
community wiki
3 revs, 2 users 62%
Henri Menke
2
“I've never encountered another Track Changes feature as good as Word's”git diff -w --word-diff
– Henri Menke
7 hours ago
1
@Canageek Since you intend this to be a big list, it might be better to split each of your sub-answers as a separate answers. This would give a better sense of which methods people use or like best.
– Alan Munn
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2
“I've never encountered another Track Changes feature as good as Word's”git diff -w --word-diff
– Henri Menke
7 hours ago
1
@Canageek Since you intend this to be a big list, it might be better to split each of your sub-answers as a separate answers. This would give a better sense of which methods people use or like best.
– Alan Munn
7 hours ago
2
2
“I've never encountered another Track Changes feature as good as Word's”
git diff -w --word-diff
– Henri Menke
7 hours ago
“I've never encountered another Track Changes feature as good as Word's”
git diff -w --word-diff
– Henri Menke
7 hours ago
1
1
@Canageek Since you intend this to be a big list, it might be better to split each of your sub-answers as a separate answers. This would give a better sense of which methods people use or like best.
– Alan Munn
7 hours ago
@Canageek Since you intend this to be a big list, it might be better to split each of your sub-answers as a separate answers. This would give a better sense of which methods people use or like best.
– Alan Munn
7 hours ago
add a comment |
When I'm working with other TeX users I tend to use git
for collaboration if they are used to working with it. If they are not used to working with git
they will be afterwards :)
2
The question is “What ways have you found to get edits from non-LaTeX users?”
– Henri Menke
6 hours ago
2
@HenriMenke and includes the fatal statement "or even other LaTeX users".
– Skillmon
6 hours ago
add a comment |
When I'm working with other TeX users I tend to use git
for collaboration if they are used to working with it. If they are not used to working with git
they will be afterwards :)
2
The question is “What ways have you found to get edits from non-LaTeX users?”
– Henri Menke
6 hours ago
2
@HenriMenke and includes the fatal statement "or even other LaTeX users".
– Skillmon
6 hours ago
add a comment |
When I'm working with other TeX users I tend to use git
for collaboration if they are used to working with it. If they are not used to working with git
they will be afterwards :)
When I'm working with other TeX users I tend to use git
for collaboration if they are used to working with it. If they are not used to working with git
they will be afterwards :)
answered 7 hours ago
SkillmonSkillmon
25.1k12451
25.1k12451
2
The question is “What ways have you found to get edits from non-LaTeX users?”
– Henri Menke
6 hours ago
2
@HenriMenke and includes the fatal statement "or even other LaTeX users".
– Skillmon
6 hours ago
add a comment |
2
The question is “What ways have you found to get edits from non-LaTeX users?”
– Henri Menke
6 hours ago
2
@HenriMenke and includes the fatal statement "or even other LaTeX users".
– Skillmon
6 hours ago
2
2
The question is “What ways have you found to get edits from non-LaTeX users?”
– Henri Menke
6 hours ago
The question is “What ways have you found to get edits from non-LaTeX users?”
– Henri Menke
6 hours ago
2
2
@HenriMenke and includes the fatal statement "or even other LaTeX users".
– Skillmon
6 hours ago
@HenriMenke and includes the fatal statement "or even other LaTeX users".
– Skillmon
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Frankly I do not understand the purpose of this question. If this is a collaboration on contents, one can just share the information in whatever format is convenient, e.g. emails, data files, pdf files, ascii text. Once you wrap up you need to agree on the document preparation system. From the question I infer that this will be LaTeX.
Of course, if the question is how to jointly grow a document that has cross links, references and so on, then IMHO there is no other way than recommending them to quickly look at a LaTeX intro. They will have to know how to label an equation that they want to refer to later. If you prepared the basic document well, i.e. just use some standard class, basic packages and avoid introducing too many self-written macros, they will be able to focus on the contents and add some text here and there. Just make sure that no one introduces glorious definitions as for instance defaalpha
. Also tell them that adding references by hand is not an option.
add a comment |
Frankly I do not understand the purpose of this question. If this is a collaboration on contents, one can just share the information in whatever format is convenient, e.g. emails, data files, pdf files, ascii text. Once you wrap up you need to agree on the document preparation system. From the question I infer that this will be LaTeX.
Of course, if the question is how to jointly grow a document that has cross links, references and so on, then IMHO there is no other way than recommending them to quickly look at a LaTeX intro. They will have to know how to label an equation that they want to refer to later. If you prepared the basic document well, i.e. just use some standard class, basic packages and avoid introducing too many self-written macros, they will be able to focus on the contents and add some text here and there. Just make sure that no one introduces glorious definitions as for instance defaalpha
. Also tell them that adding references by hand is not an option.
add a comment |
Frankly I do not understand the purpose of this question. If this is a collaboration on contents, one can just share the information in whatever format is convenient, e.g. emails, data files, pdf files, ascii text. Once you wrap up you need to agree on the document preparation system. From the question I infer that this will be LaTeX.
Of course, if the question is how to jointly grow a document that has cross links, references and so on, then IMHO there is no other way than recommending them to quickly look at a LaTeX intro. They will have to know how to label an equation that they want to refer to later. If you prepared the basic document well, i.e. just use some standard class, basic packages and avoid introducing too many self-written macros, they will be able to focus on the contents and add some text here and there. Just make sure that no one introduces glorious definitions as for instance defaalpha
. Also tell them that adding references by hand is not an option.
Frankly I do not understand the purpose of this question. If this is a collaboration on contents, one can just share the information in whatever format is convenient, e.g. emails, data files, pdf files, ascii text. Once you wrap up you need to agree on the document preparation system. From the question I infer that this will be LaTeX.
Of course, if the question is how to jointly grow a document that has cross links, references and so on, then IMHO there is no other way than recommending them to quickly look at a LaTeX intro. They will have to know how to label an equation that they want to refer to later. If you prepared the basic document well, i.e. just use some standard class, basic packages and avoid introducing too many self-written macros, they will be able to focus on the contents and add some text here and there. Just make sure that no one introduces glorious definitions as for instance defaalpha
. Also tell them that adding references by hand is not an option.
answered 6 hours ago
community wiki
marmot
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494059%2fwhat-ways-have-you-found-to-get-edits-from-non-latex-users%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown