Can someone help me to understand this sentence? “Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes”

How to retract an idea already pitched to an employer?

At what point in time did Dumbledore ask Snape for this favor?

What's the largest optical telescope mirror ever put in space?

What risks are there when you clear your cookies instead of logging off?

Why was the Sega Genesis marketed as a 16-bit console?

When conversion from Integer to Single may lose precision

Why doesn’t a normal window produce an apparent rainbow?

GMRES vs Newton-GMRES for Solving nonlinear PDE's

How would a aircraft visually signal "in distress"?

Investing in a Roth IRA with a Personal Loan?

Do simulator games use a realistic trajectory to get into orbit?

PhD - Well known professor or well known school?

Is the term 'open source' a trademark?

What makes an item an artifact?

How Can I Tell The Difference Between Unmarked Sugar and Stevia?

What is the `some` keyword in SwiftUI

How did they achieve the Gunslinger's shining eye effect in Westworld?

Movie about a boy who was born old and grew young

Preventing Employees from either switching to Competitors or Opening Their Own Business

Was there a priest on the Titanic who stayed on the ship giving confession to as many as he could?

What does the term "railed" mean in signal processing?

Inconsistent behavior of compiler optimization of unused string

BGP convergence issue

Can someone help me to understand this sentence? "Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes"



Can someone help me to understand this sentence? “Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes”







.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















The article link: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-03/alphabet-falls-to-lowest-in-five-months-as-doj-mulls-probe




Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.




I am having hard time understanding this sentence. Especially




"... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes".




What does "appear set to" mean? Is set a verb or a noun? I don't know what kind of grammar it is to put 2 verbs together. Can someone explain it to me?



Also,




agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




I know what each individual word means, but when they combined together, I don't get what the FTC is trying to do with these technology giants. Do they want to supervise these companies or they are trying to split these companies into smaller ones?



One last thing, why does it say "Google parent" instead of "Google's parent"? Is it correct grammar?










share|improve this question




























    2















    The article link: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-03/alphabet-falls-to-lowest-in-five-months-as-doj-mulls-probe




    Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.




    I am having hard time understanding this sentence. Especially




    "... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes".




    What does "appear set to" mean? Is set a verb or a noun? I don't know what kind of grammar it is to put 2 verbs together. Can someone explain it to me?



    Also,




    agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




    I know what each individual word means, but when they combined together, I don't get what the FTC is trying to do with these technology giants. Do they want to supervise these companies or they are trying to split these companies into smaller ones?



    One last thing, why does it say "Google parent" instead of "Google's parent"? Is it correct grammar?










    share|improve this question
























      2












      2








      2


      1






      The article link: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-03/alphabet-falls-to-lowest-in-five-months-as-doj-mulls-probe




      Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.




      I am having hard time understanding this sentence. Especially




      "... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes".




      What does "appear set to" mean? Is set a verb or a noun? I don't know what kind of grammar it is to put 2 verbs together. Can someone explain it to me?



      Also,




      agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




      I know what each individual word means, but when they combined together, I don't get what the FTC is trying to do with these technology giants. Do they want to supervise these companies or they are trying to split these companies into smaller ones?



      One last thing, why does it say "Google parent" instead of "Google's parent"? Is it correct grammar?










      share|improve this question














      The article link: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-03/alphabet-falls-to-lowest-in-five-months-as-doj-mulls-probe




      Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.




      I am having hard time understanding this sentence. Especially




      "... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes".




      What does "appear set to" mean? Is set a verb or a noun? I don't know what kind of grammar it is to put 2 verbs together. Can someone explain it to me?



      Also,




      agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




      I know what each individual word means, but when they combined together, I don't get what the FTC is trying to do with these technology giants. Do they want to supervise these companies or they are trying to split these companies into smaller ones?



      One last thing, why does it say "Google parent" instead of "Google's parent"? Is it correct grammar?







      meaning meaning-in-context word-meaning






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      AlexAlex

      2752412




      2752412




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4















          ... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes.




          "set to" means "prepared to" or "ready to" here, but with a strong implication that they are prepared because it is going to happen. So in effect, "set to" means "highly likely to".



          Consider a parallel construction:




          Jane appears ready to run the race.




          I believe "ready" is a bare initiative form here, and "to run the race" is the object of "ready". Or perhaps it would be better to say that "appears ready" jointly form a phrasal verb, with "to run the race" as its object, and "Jane" as the subject. In that case, "appear set" is also a phrasal verb, with subject "the companies" and object "to undergo U.S. antitrust probes."



          As to




          ... agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




          This means that the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the US Department of Justice (DOJ) have agreed to divide the task. According to the linked article:




          ... the FTC will oversee antitrust scrutiny into whether Facebook’s practices harm competition in the digital market. Reuters reported that the DOJ has been given jurisdiction over a potential probe of Apple.




          So the split is between The FTC and the DOJ, not a prospective division of the companies into smaller parts.



          "Google parent" is "headlinese" or "journalese". "Google's parent " would be more strictly correct, but in a news story, particularly in a headline or in an opening paragraph (or "lede" as it is known) brevity is of great value, and so two characters and one syllable are saved. This has been used often enough that the form "X parent, Y" for "Y, the parent of X" is in common use, especially in financial journalism. Often the parent company is the one legally involved in some action, but the subsidiary is far better known, as is the case here: Google is much better known than Alphabet. The form "X parent, Y" allows the emphasis to be put on X, the well-known name.



          The question did not ask about it, but some may be confused by the use of "tumbled" in the opening sentence of the article. This means that the stock price fell suddenly and significantly.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Good answer. You covered pretty much all the points I was going to make. I would just add that it might have been easier to understand the second sentence if there was some kind of determiner before both "oversight" and "technology giants", e.g. "split up the oversight of these kind of technology giants". Determiners are routinely omitted when they add no useful information to the sentence, and where the grammar allows, but adult English readers know what would most likely have been used.

            – Andrew
            6 hours ago












          • @Andrew I agree that such a construction would have been clearer. But since many writers, especially journalists, make such omissions often, learners must become able to understand the resulting sentences.

            – David Siegel
            6 hours ago











          • Not sure that set to means highly likely. It means they are prepared for one.

            – Lambie
            6 hours ago






          • 1





            @Lambie Yes it means that they are prepared, but I think that it implies that what they are prepared for will happen. The rest of the article seems to me to confirm that view, and i have also seen "set to" used to cover both meanings at once, particularly is sports contexts; "He is set to break the home-run record in the next three games"

            – David Siegel
            5 hours ago


















          0














          Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.



          1) Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc.=those three companies



          2) tumbled = the value of their shares on the stock market fell



          3) appear set to undergo=seem to be ready or prepared for: to be set for



          4) antitrust probes=antitrust is anti-monopoly, basically. The law is the anti-trust law, anti-monopoly law. probes=investigations of them by the Dept. of Justice and the FTC



          5) oversight: that is a function in US government parlance. The FTC has oversight over certain matters, like making sure there are no monopolistic activities. To have oversight=to be in charge of overseeing or making sure organizations or companies behave properly.



          6) to split up oversight=to share it, divide it into two parts; each authority will take half of the work of investigating them. Neither will do the work alone.



          6) In financial news publications, they often do not use the possessive. They just do not. It's a style of financial writing.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "481"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f213370%2fcan-someone-help-me-to-understand-this-sentence-apple-inc-tumbled-as-the-comp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4















            ... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes.




            "set to" means "prepared to" or "ready to" here, but with a strong implication that they are prepared because it is going to happen. So in effect, "set to" means "highly likely to".



            Consider a parallel construction:




            Jane appears ready to run the race.




            I believe "ready" is a bare initiative form here, and "to run the race" is the object of "ready". Or perhaps it would be better to say that "appears ready" jointly form a phrasal verb, with "to run the race" as its object, and "Jane" as the subject. In that case, "appear set" is also a phrasal verb, with subject "the companies" and object "to undergo U.S. antitrust probes."



            As to




            ... agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




            This means that the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the US Department of Justice (DOJ) have agreed to divide the task. According to the linked article:




            ... the FTC will oversee antitrust scrutiny into whether Facebook’s practices harm competition in the digital market. Reuters reported that the DOJ has been given jurisdiction over a potential probe of Apple.




            So the split is between The FTC and the DOJ, not a prospective division of the companies into smaller parts.



            "Google parent" is "headlinese" or "journalese". "Google's parent " would be more strictly correct, but in a news story, particularly in a headline or in an opening paragraph (or "lede" as it is known) brevity is of great value, and so two characters and one syllable are saved. This has been used often enough that the form "X parent, Y" for "Y, the parent of X" is in common use, especially in financial journalism. Often the parent company is the one legally involved in some action, but the subsidiary is far better known, as is the case here: Google is much better known than Alphabet. The form "X parent, Y" allows the emphasis to be put on X, the well-known name.



            The question did not ask about it, but some may be confused by the use of "tumbled" in the opening sentence of the article. This means that the stock price fell suddenly and significantly.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Good answer. You covered pretty much all the points I was going to make. I would just add that it might have been easier to understand the second sentence if there was some kind of determiner before both "oversight" and "technology giants", e.g. "split up the oversight of these kind of technology giants". Determiners are routinely omitted when they add no useful information to the sentence, and where the grammar allows, but adult English readers know what would most likely have been used.

              – Andrew
              6 hours ago












            • @Andrew I agree that such a construction would have been clearer. But since many writers, especially journalists, make such omissions often, learners must become able to understand the resulting sentences.

              – David Siegel
              6 hours ago











            • Not sure that set to means highly likely. It means they are prepared for one.

              – Lambie
              6 hours ago






            • 1





              @Lambie Yes it means that they are prepared, but I think that it implies that what they are prepared for will happen. The rest of the article seems to me to confirm that view, and i have also seen "set to" used to cover both meanings at once, particularly is sports contexts; "He is set to break the home-run record in the next three games"

              – David Siegel
              5 hours ago















            4















            ... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes.




            "set to" means "prepared to" or "ready to" here, but with a strong implication that they are prepared because it is going to happen. So in effect, "set to" means "highly likely to".



            Consider a parallel construction:




            Jane appears ready to run the race.




            I believe "ready" is a bare initiative form here, and "to run the race" is the object of "ready". Or perhaps it would be better to say that "appears ready" jointly form a phrasal verb, with "to run the race" as its object, and "Jane" as the subject. In that case, "appear set" is also a phrasal verb, with subject "the companies" and object "to undergo U.S. antitrust probes."



            As to




            ... agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




            This means that the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the US Department of Justice (DOJ) have agreed to divide the task. According to the linked article:




            ... the FTC will oversee antitrust scrutiny into whether Facebook’s practices harm competition in the digital market. Reuters reported that the DOJ has been given jurisdiction over a potential probe of Apple.




            So the split is between The FTC and the DOJ, not a prospective division of the companies into smaller parts.



            "Google parent" is "headlinese" or "journalese". "Google's parent " would be more strictly correct, but in a news story, particularly in a headline or in an opening paragraph (or "lede" as it is known) brevity is of great value, and so two characters and one syllable are saved. This has been used often enough that the form "X parent, Y" for "Y, the parent of X" is in common use, especially in financial journalism. Often the parent company is the one legally involved in some action, but the subsidiary is far better known, as is the case here: Google is much better known than Alphabet. The form "X parent, Y" allows the emphasis to be put on X, the well-known name.



            The question did not ask about it, but some may be confused by the use of "tumbled" in the opening sentence of the article. This means that the stock price fell suddenly and significantly.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Good answer. You covered pretty much all the points I was going to make. I would just add that it might have been easier to understand the second sentence if there was some kind of determiner before both "oversight" and "technology giants", e.g. "split up the oversight of these kind of technology giants". Determiners are routinely omitted when they add no useful information to the sentence, and where the grammar allows, but adult English readers know what would most likely have been used.

              – Andrew
              6 hours ago












            • @Andrew I agree that such a construction would have been clearer. But since many writers, especially journalists, make such omissions often, learners must become able to understand the resulting sentences.

              – David Siegel
              6 hours ago











            • Not sure that set to means highly likely. It means they are prepared for one.

              – Lambie
              6 hours ago






            • 1





              @Lambie Yes it means that they are prepared, but I think that it implies that what they are prepared for will happen. The rest of the article seems to me to confirm that view, and i have also seen "set to" used to cover both meanings at once, particularly is sports contexts; "He is set to break the home-run record in the next three games"

              – David Siegel
              5 hours ago













            4












            4








            4








            ... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes.




            "set to" means "prepared to" or "ready to" here, but with a strong implication that they are prepared because it is going to happen. So in effect, "set to" means "highly likely to".



            Consider a parallel construction:




            Jane appears ready to run the race.




            I believe "ready" is a bare initiative form here, and "to run the race" is the object of "ready". Or perhaps it would be better to say that "appears ready" jointly form a phrasal verb, with "to run the race" as its object, and "Jane" as the subject. In that case, "appear set" is also a phrasal verb, with subject "the companies" and object "to undergo U.S. antitrust probes."



            As to




            ... agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




            This means that the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the US Department of Justice (DOJ) have agreed to divide the task. According to the linked article:




            ... the FTC will oversee antitrust scrutiny into whether Facebook’s practices harm competition in the digital market. Reuters reported that the DOJ has been given jurisdiction over a potential probe of Apple.




            So the split is between The FTC and the DOJ, not a prospective division of the companies into smaller parts.



            "Google parent" is "headlinese" or "journalese". "Google's parent " would be more strictly correct, but in a news story, particularly in a headline or in an opening paragraph (or "lede" as it is known) brevity is of great value, and so two characters and one syllable are saved. This has been used often enough that the form "X parent, Y" for "Y, the parent of X" is in common use, especially in financial journalism. Often the parent company is the one legally involved in some action, but the subsidiary is far better known, as is the case here: Google is much better known than Alphabet. The form "X parent, Y" allows the emphasis to be put on X, the well-known name.



            The question did not ask about it, but some may be confused by the use of "tumbled" in the opening sentence of the article. This means that the stock price fell suddenly and significantly.






            share|improve this answer
















            ... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes.




            "set to" means "prepared to" or "ready to" here, but with a strong implication that they are prepared because it is going to happen. So in effect, "set to" means "highly likely to".



            Consider a parallel construction:




            Jane appears ready to run the race.




            I believe "ready" is a bare initiative form here, and "to run the race" is the object of "ready". Or perhaps it would be better to say that "appears ready" jointly form a phrasal verb, with "to run the race" as its object, and "Jane" as the subject. In that case, "appear set" is also a phrasal verb, with subject "the companies" and object "to undergo U.S. antitrust probes."



            As to




            ... agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




            This means that the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the US Department of Justice (DOJ) have agreed to divide the task. According to the linked article:




            ... the FTC will oversee antitrust scrutiny into whether Facebook’s practices harm competition in the digital market. Reuters reported that the DOJ has been given jurisdiction over a potential probe of Apple.




            So the split is between The FTC and the DOJ, not a prospective division of the companies into smaller parts.



            "Google parent" is "headlinese" or "journalese". "Google's parent " would be more strictly correct, but in a news story, particularly in a headline or in an opening paragraph (or "lede" as it is known) brevity is of great value, and so two characters and one syllable are saved. This has been used often enough that the form "X parent, Y" for "Y, the parent of X" is in common use, especially in financial journalism. Often the parent company is the one legally involved in some action, but the subsidiary is far better known, as is the case here: Google is much better known than Alphabet. The form "X parent, Y" allows the emphasis to be put on X, the well-known name.



            The question did not ask about it, but some may be confused by the use of "tumbled" in the opening sentence of the article. This means that the stock price fell suddenly and significantly.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 6 hours ago

























            answered 6 hours ago









            David SiegelDavid Siegel

            8,3471027




            8,3471027












            • Good answer. You covered pretty much all the points I was going to make. I would just add that it might have been easier to understand the second sentence if there was some kind of determiner before both "oversight" and "technology giants", e.g. "split up the oversight of these kind of technology giants". Determiners are routinely omitted when they add no useful information to the sentence, and where the grammar allows, but adult English readers know what would most likely have been used.

              – Andrew
              6 hours ago












            • @Andrew I agree that such a construction would have been clearer. But since many writers, especially journalists, make such omissions often, learners must become able to understand the resulting sentences.

              – David Siegel
              6 hours ago











            • Not sure that set to means highly likely. It means they are prepared for one.

              – Lambie
              6 hours ago






            • 1





              @Lambie Yes it means that they are prepared, but I think that it implies that what they are prepared for will happen. The rest of the article seems to me to confirm that view, and i have also seen "set to" used to cover both meanings at once, particularly is sports contexts; "He is set to break the home-run record in the next three games"

              – David Siegel
              5 hours ago

















            • Good answer. You covered pretty much all the points I was going to make. I would just add that it might have been easier to understand the second sentence if there was some kind of determiner before both "oversight" and "technology giants", e.g. "split up the oversight of these kind of technology giants". Determiners are routinely omitted when they add no useful information to the sentence, and where the grammar allows, but adult English readers know what would most likely have been used.

              – Andrew
              6 hours ago












            • @Andrew I agree that such a construction would have been clearer. But since many writers, especially journalists, make such omissions often, learners must become able to understand the resulting sentences.

              – David Siegel
              6 hours ago











            • Not sure that set to means highly likely. It means they are prepared for one.

              – Lambie
              6 hours ago






            • 1





              @Lambie Yes it means that they are prepared, but I think that it implies that what they are prepared for will happen. The rest of the article seems to me to confirm that view, and i have also seen "set to" used to cover both meanings at once, particularly is sports contexts; "He is set to break the home-run record in the next three games"

              – David Siegel
              5 hours ago
















            Good answer. You covered pretty much all the points I was going to make. I would just add that it might have been easier to understand the second sentence if there was some kind of determiner before both "oversight" and "technology giants", e.g. "split up the oversight of these kind of technology giants". Determiners are routinely omitted when they add no useful information to the sentence, and where the grammar allows, but adult English readers know what would most likely have been used.

            – Andrew
            6 hours ago






            Good answer. You covered pretty much all the points I was going to make. I would just add that it might have been easier to understand the second sentence if there was some kind of determiner before both "oversight" and "technology giants", e.g. "split up the oversight of these kind of technology giants". Determiners are routinely omitted when they add no useful information to the sentence, and where the grammar allows, but adult English readers know what would most likely have been used.

            – Andrew
            6 hours ago














            @Andrew I agree that such a construction would have been clearer. But since many writers, especially journalists, make such omissions often, learners must become able to understand the resulting sentences.

            – David Siegel
            6 hours ago





            @Andrew I agree that such a construction would have been clearer. But since many writers, especially journalists, make such omissions often, learners must become able to understand the resulting sentences.

            – David Siegel
            6 hours ago













            Not sure that set to means highly likely. It means they are prepared for one.

            – Lambie
            6 hours ago





            Not sure that set to means highly likely. It means they are prepared for one.

            – Lambie
            6 hours ago




            1




            1





            @Lambie Yes it means that they are prepared, but I think that it implies that what they are prepared for will happen. The rest of the article seems to me to confirm that view, and i have also seen "set to" used to cover both meanings at once, particularly is sports contexts; "He is set to break the home-run record in the next three games"

            – David Siegel
            5 hours ago





            @Lambie Yes it means that they are prepared, but I think that it implies that what they are prepared for will happen. The rest of the article seems to me to confirm that view, and i have also seen "set to" used to cover both meanings at once, particularly is sports contexts; "He is set to break the home-run record in the next three games"

            – David Siegel
            5 hours ago













            0














            Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.



            1) Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc.=those three companies



            2) tumbled = the value of their shares on the stock market fell



            3) appear set to undergo=seem to be ready or prepared for: to be set for



            4) antitrust probes=antitrust is anti-monopoly, basically. The law is the anti-trust law, anti-monopoly law. probes=investigations of them by the Dept. of Justice and the FTC



            5) oversight: that is a function in US government parlance. The FTC has oversight over certain matters, like making sure there are no monopolistic activities. To have oversight=to be in charge of overseeing or making sure organizations or companies behave properly.



            6) to split up oversight=to share it, divide it into two parts; each authority will take half of the work of investigating them. Neither will do the work alone.



            6) In financial news publications, they often do not use the possessive. They just do not. It's a style of financial writing.






            share|improve this answer



























              0














              Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.



              1) Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc.=those three companies



              2) tumbled = the value of their shares on the stock market fell



              3) appear set to undergo=seem to be ready or prepared for: to be set for



              4) antitrust probes=antitrust is anti-monopoly, basically. The law is the anti-trust law, anti-monopoly law. probes=investigations of them by the Dept. of Justice and the FTC



              5) oversight: that is a function in US government parlance. The FTC has oversight over certain matters, like making sure there are no monopolistic activities. To have oversight=to be in charge of overseeing or making sure organizations or companies behave properly.



              6) to split up oversight=to share it, divide it into two parts; each authority will take half of the work of investigating them. Neither will do the work alone.



              6) In financial news publications, they often do not use the possessive. They just do not. It's a style of financial writing.






              share|improve this answer

























                0












                0








                0







                Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.



                1) Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc.=those three companies



                2) tumbled = the value of their shares on the stock market fell



                3) appear set to undergo=seem to be ready or prepared for: to be set for



                4) antitrust probes=antitrust is anti-monopoly, basically. The law is the anti-trust law, anti-monopoly law. probes=investigations of them by the Dept. of Justice and the FTC



                5) oversight: that is a function in US government parlance. The FTC has oversight over certain matters, like making sure there are no monopolistic activities. To have oversight=to be in charge of overseeing or making sure organizations or companies behave properly.



                6) to split up oversight=to share it, divide it into two parts; each authority will take half of the work of investigating them. Neither will do the work alone.



                6) In financial news publications, they often do not use the possessive. They just do not. It's a style of financial writing.






                share|improve this answer













                Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.



                1) Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc.=those three companies



                2) tumbled = the value of their shares on the stock market fell



                3) appear set to undergo=seem to be ready or prepared for: to be set for



                4) antitrust probes=antitrust is anti-monopoly, basically. The law is the anti-trust law, anti-monopoly law. probes=investigations of them by the Dept. of Justice and the FTC



                5) oversight: that is a function in US government parlance. The FTC has oversight over certain matters, like making sure there are no monopolistic activities. To have oversight=to be in charge of overseeing or making sure organizations or companies behave properly.



                6) to split up oversight=to share it, divide it into two parts; each authority will take half of the work of investigating them. Neither will do the work alone.



                6) In financial news publications, they often do not use the possessive. They just do not. It's a style of financial writing.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 5 hours ago









                LambieLambie

                19.2k1643




                19.2k1643



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f213370%2fcan-someone-help-me-to-understand-this-sentence-apple-inc-tumbled-as-the-comp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                    Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                    Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її