Is there a rule that prohibits us from using 2 possessives in a row?Using the genitive with “this week”How is the “'s” related to the death of a person or of an animalAll this is Kim'sUsing “This” instead of “That”“X's Y” vs “Y of X”Is the apostrophe used correctly in “people's interest in their ancestor's family…”?When can uniquness and reminiscence be cancellable?Using the Saxon genitive or not?Usage and omission of “any”MY old friend VS an old friend OF MINE

Mother abusing my finances

Expenditure in Poland - Forex doesn't have Zloty

Future enhancements for the finite element method

Fastest way to perform complex search on pandas dataframe

How to prevent bad sectors?

How was Apollo supposed to rendezvous in the case of a lunar abort?

How to detach yourself from a character you're going to kill?

Can I install a row of bricks on a slab to support a shed?

chmod would set file permission to 000 no matter what permission i try to set

Comment dit-on « I’ll tell you what » ?

Is this light switch installation safe and legal?

The qvolume of an integer

Why do Russians call their women expensive ("дорогая")?

If I create magical darkness with the Silent Image spell, can I see through it if I have the Devil's Sight warlock invocation?

Uncommanded roll at high speed

Could IPv6 make NAT / port numbers redundant?

Possible nonclassical ion from a bicyclic system

Is there a rule that prohibits us from using 2 possessives in a row?

How should I push back against my job assigning "homework"?

What is the indigenous Russian word for a wild boar?

Can a non-EU citizen travel within the Schengen area without identity documents?

SPI on stm32 won't work without pullup resistors and even then performs poorly

How to properly maintain eye contact with people that have distinctive facial features?

How to capture more stars?



Is there a rule that prohibits us from using 2 possessives in a row?


Using the genitive with “this week”How is the “'s” related to the death of a person or of an animalAll this is Kim'sUsing “This” instead of “That”“X's Y” vs “Y of X”Is the apostrophe used correctly in “people's interest in their ancestor's family…”?When can uniquness and reminiscence be cancellable?Using the Saxon genitive or not?Usage and omission of “any”MY old friend VS an old friend OF MINE






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















An English teacher made a comment on my usage of the phrase, "Our last week's meeting", saying that it should be, "last week's meeting", is there a rule for this?










share|improve this question






























    1















    An English teacher made a comment on my usage of the phrase, "Our last week's meeting", saying that it should be, "last week's meeting", is there a rule for this?










    share|improve this question


























      1












      1








      1








      An English teacher made a comment on my usage of the phrase, "Our last week's meeting", saying that it should be, "last week's meeting", is there a rule for this?










      share|improve this question
















      An English teacher made a comment on my usage of the phrase, "Our last week's meeting", saying that it should be, "last week's meeting", is there a rule for this?







      possessives determiners






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 5 hours ago









      Jasper

      20.8k44176




      20.8k44176










      asked 8 hours ago









      hey_youhey_you

      1162




      1162




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          I've answered essentially the same question over at english.stackexchange.com: Why is “our today's meeting” wrong?



          Usually, a noun phrase in English must have exactly one determiner: you can say "I drove this car" or "I drove my car", but not "I drove car" or "I drove this my car".



          Certain nouns (such as plural nouns and proper nouns) don't need determiners: "I love bees", "I love milk", "I love Paris", "I love biology". But it's never acceptable for a noun phrase to have more than one determiner (with possible extremely rare exceptions).



          "Our last week's meeting" is unacceptable because the noun phrase "meeting" has two determiners, "our" and "last week's". It would also be unacceptable to say "the today's meeting" or "our the meeting".



          Here are some phrases which may seem to have multiple determiners, but don't actually:



          • your father's home - this noun phrase has only one determiner, namely, "your father's". Meanwhile, the phrase "your father" is also a noun phrase which only has one determiner, namely, "your".

          • the brass men's wristwatches - the determiner of this noun phrase is "the", and "brass" and "men's" are adjectives.

          • an old people's home - the determiner of this noun phrase is "an". The phrase "old people's home" is an idiom which acts as a simple noun, even though it looks like it contains a determiner.





          share|improve this answer























          • Perhaps I've been reading too much fiction, but I initially parsed "the brass men's wristwatches" as wristwatches worn by literal brass-men, and not men's wristwatches made of brass.

            – mbrig
            8 mins ago











          • As it happens, I spent several minutes trying to think of an adjective which could reasonably modify "wristwatches" but not "men". :)

            – Tanner Swett
            6 mins ago


















          2















          Our last week's meeting




          is a little akward, but I for one do not think that it is incorrect.



          The answer by Tanner Swett says "it's never acceptable for a noun phrase to have more than one determiner." However, the Wikipedia article lists eight different "common" cases where multiple determiners are acceptable. Specifically:




          • A definite determiner can be followed by certain quantifiers (the many problems, these three things, my very few faults).

          • The words all and both can be followed by a definite determiner (all the green apples, both the boys), which can also be followed by a quantifier as above (all the many outstanding issues).

          • The word all can be followed by a cardinal number (all three things).

          • The word some can be followed by a cardinal number (some eight packets, meaning "approximately eight").

          • Words and phrases expressing fractions and multiples, such as half, double, twice, three times, etc. can be followed by a definite determiner: half a minute, double the risk, twice my age, three times my salary, three-quarters the diameter, etc.

          • The words such and exclamative-what can be followed by an indefinite article (as mentioned in the section above).

          • The word many can be used with the indefinite article and a singular noun (many a night, many an awkward moment).

          • The words each and every can be followed by a cardinal number or other expression of definite quantity (each two seats, every five grams of flour).



          ...




          As with other parts of speech, it is often possible to connect determiners of the same type with the conjunctions and and or: his and her children, two or three beans.




          The same answer says that "I drove this my car" is wrong. The form "this" followed by a possessive is now rare, but was once more common, especially in formal writing. In particular sentences such as:




          It is a mistake to regard aspects of this our present society as unchangeable rules.




          were sufficiently common to be a style marker in the writings of the late Robert A Heinlein.



          Since the question title asks about using "two possessives in a row", this can certainly be proper.




          • This was John's father's watch.

          • This was King Mark's wife's cousin's castle.



          are both quite correct.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            Also this my will and this 29th of May 2019 - not common but not wrong. The Wikipedia article is just counting things as determiners that @TannerSwett is not counting, I think. I don't think it is really saying anything different. Anyway our last week's meeting does not come under any of the eight exceptions, as far as I can see, and to me it is so obviously wrong that it would take a lot more than a Wikipedia article to convince me otherwise.

            – Minty
            1 hour ago











          • @Minty then we must agree to differ. I would think "our today's meeting" so odd as to be wrong, but "our last week's meeting" unusual but acceptable, leaving aside the case of Indian English, where it seems to be the usual form.

            – David Siegel
            1 hour ago











          • I can't imagine what logic would permit one of those constructions but not the other. Anyway I think the this... exceptions are more interesting. There must be some explanation but for now it escapes me. I don't think they come from e.g. this (my will, that is).

            – Minty
            1 hour ago











          • @Minty I don't think there is any true logic here, merely a pattern of usage. But then i think the attempt to find a fully logical rule in English grammar is often futile and wrongheaded. I agree that the constructions 'this"+possessive pronoun+noun or noun phrase are interesting, and i don't know their origin.

            – David Siegel
            58 mins ago


















          0














          It's either:




          Last week's meeting




          or:




          Our meeting last week




          but I agree with your teacher that:




          Our last week's meeting




          sounds awkward and should probably be avoided.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "481"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212566%2fis-there-a-rule-that-prohibits-us-from-using-2-possessives-in-a-row%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            I've answered essentially the same question over at english.stackexchange.com: Why is “our today's meeting” wrong?



            Usually, a noun phrase in English must have exactly one determiner: you can say "I drove this car" or "I drove my car", but not "I drove car" or "I drove this my car".



            Certain nouns (such as plural nouns and proper nouns) don't need determiners: "I love bees", "I love milk", "I love Paris", "I love biology". But it's never acceptable for a noun phrase to have more than one determiner (with possible extremely rare exceptions).



            "Our last week's meeting" is unacceptable because the noun phrase "meeting" has two determiners, "our" and "last week's". It would also be unacceptable to say "the today's meeting" or "our the meeting".



            Here are some phrases which may seem to have multiple determiners, but don't actually:



            • your father's home - this noun phrase has only one determiner, namely, "your father's". Meanwhile, the phrase "your father" is also a noun phrase which only has one determiner, namely, "your".

            • the brass men's wristwatches - the determiner of this noun phrase is "the", and "brass" and "men's" are adjectives.

            • an old people's home - the determiner of this noun phrase is "an". The phrase "old people's home" is an idiom which acts as a simple noun, even though it looks like it contains a determiner.





            share|improve this answer























            • Perhaps I've been reading too much fiction, but I initially parsed "the brass men's wristwatches" as wristwatches worn by literal brass-men, and not men's wristwatches made of brass.

              – mbrig
              8 mins ago











            • As it happens, I spent several minutes trying to think of an adjective which could reasonably modify "wristwatches" but not "men". :)

              – Tanner Swett
              6 mins ago















            4














            I've answered essentially the same question over at english.stackexchange.com: Why is “our today's meeting” wrong?



            Usually, a noun phrase in English must have exactly one determiner: you can say "I drove this car" or "I drove my car", but not "I drove car" or "I drove this my car".



            Certain nouns (such as plural nouns and proper nouns) don't need determiners: "I love bees", "I love milk", "I love Paris", "I love biology". But it's never acceptable for a noun phrase to have more than one determiner (with possible extremely rare exceptions).



            "Our last week's meeting" is unacceptable because the noun phrase "meeting" has two determiners, "our" and "last week's". It would also be unacceptable to say "the today's meeting" or "our the meeting".



            Here are some phrases which may seem to have multiple determiners, but don't actually:



            • your father's home - this noun phrase has only one determiner, namely, "your father's". Meanwhile, the phrase "your father" is also a noun phrase which only has one determiner, namely, "your".

            • the brass men's wristwatches - the determiner of this noun phrase is "the", and "brass" and "men's" are adjectives.

            • an old people's home - the determiner of this noun phrase is "an". The phrase "old people's home" is an idiom which acts as a simple noun, even though it looks like it contains a determiner.





            share|improve this answer























            • Perhaps I've been reading too much fiction, but I initially parsed "the brass men's wristwatches" as wristwatches worn by literal brass-men, and not men's wristwatches made of brass.

              – mbrig
              8 mins ago











            • As it happens, I spent several minutes trying to think of an adjective which could reasonably modify "wristwatches" but not "men". :)

              – Tanner Swett
              6 mins ago













            4












            4








            4







            I've answered essentially the same question over at english.stackexchange.com: Why is “our today's meeting” wrong?



            Usually, a noun phrase in English must have exactly one determiner: you can say "I drove this car" or "I drove my car", but not "I drove car" or "I drove this my car".



            Certain nouns (such as plural nouns and proper nouns) don't need determiners: "I love bees", "I love milk", "I love Paris", "I love biology". But it's never acceptable for a noun phrase to have more than one determiner (with possible extremely rare exceptions).



            "Our last week's meeting" is unacceptable because the noun phrase "meeting" has two determiners, "our" and "last week's". It would also be unacceptable to say "the today's meeting" or "our the meeting".



            Here are some phrases which may seem to have multiple determiners, but don't actually:



            • your father's home - this noun phrase has only one determiner, namely, "your father's". Meanwhile, the phrase "your father" is also a noun phrase which only has one determiner, namely, "your".

            • the brass men's wristwatches - the determiner of this noun phrase is "the", and "brass" and "men's" are adjectives.

            • an old people's home - the determiner of this noun phrase is "an". The phrase "old people's home" is an idiom which acts as a simple noun, even though it looks like it contains a determiner.





            share|improve this answer













            I've answered essentially the same question over at english.stackexchange.com: Why is “our today's meeting” wrong?



            Usually, a noun phrase in English must have exactly one determiner: you can say "I drove this car" or "I drove my car", but not "I drove car" or "I drove this my car".



            Certain nouns (such as plural nouns and proper nouns) don't need determiners: "I love bees", "I love milk", "I love Paris", "I love biology". But it's never acceptable for a noun phrase to have more than one determiner (with possible extremely rare exceptions).



            "Our last week's meeting" is unacceptable because the noun phrase "meeting" has two determiners, "our" and "last week's". It would also be unacceptable to say "the today's meeting" or "our the meeting".



            Here are some phrases which may seem to have multiple determiners, but don't actually:



            • your father's home - this noun phrase has only one determiner, namely, "your father's". Meanwhile, the phrase "your father" is also a noun phrase which only has one determiner, namely, "your".

            • the brass men's wristwatches - the determiner of this noun phrase is "the", and "brass" and "men's" are adjectives.

            • an old people's home - the determiner of this noun phrase is "an". The phrase "old people's home" is an idiom which acts as a simple noun, even though it looks like it contains a determiner.






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 4 hours ago









            Tanner SwettTanner Swett

            1,668611




            1,668611












            • Perhaps I've been reading too much fiction, but I initially parsed "the brass men's wristwatches" as wristwatches worn by literal brass-men, and not men's wristwatches made of brass.

              – mbrig
              8 mins ago











            • As it happens, I spent several minutes trying to think of an adjective which could reasonably modify "wristwatches" but not "men". :)

              – Tanner Swett
              6 mins ago

















            • Perhaps I've been reading too much fiction, but I initially parsed "the brass men's wristwatches" as wristwatches worn by literal brass-men, and not men's wristwatches made of brass.

              – mbrig
              8 mins ago











            • As it happens, I spent several minutes trying to think of an adjective which could reasonably modify "wristwatches" but not "men". :)

              – Tanner Swett
              6 mins ago
















            Perhaps I've been reading too much fiction, but I initially parsed "the brass men's wristwatches" as wristwatches worn by literal brass-men, and not men's wristwatches made of brass.

            – mbrig
            8 mins ago





            Perhaps I've been reading too much fiction, but I initially parsed "the brass men's wristwatches" as wristwatches worn by literal brass-men, and not men's wristwatches made of brass.

            – mbrig
            8 mins ago













            As it happens, I spent several minutes trying to think of an adjective which could reasonably modify "wristwatches" but not "men". :)

            – Tanner Swett
            6 mins ago





            As it happens, I spent several minutes trying to think of an adjective which could reasonably modify "wristwatches" but not "men". :)

            – Tanner Swett
            6 mins ago













            2















            Our last week's meeting




            is a little akward, but I for one do not think that it is incorrect.



            The answer by Tanner Swett says "it's never acceptable for a noun phrase to have more than one determiner." However, the Wikipedia article lists eight different "common" cases where multiple determiners are acceptable. Specifically:




            • A definite determiner can be followed by certain quantifiers (the many problems, these three things, my very few faults).

            • The words all and both can be followed by a definite determiner (all the green apples, both the boys), which can also be followed by a quantifier as above (all the many outstanding issues).

            • The word all can be followed by a cardinal number (all three things).

            • The word some can be followed by a cardinal number (some eight packets, meaning "approximately eight").

            • Words and phrases expressing fractions and multiples, such as half, double, twice, three times, etc. can be followed by a definite determiner: half a minute, double the risk, twice my age, three times my salary, three-quarters the diameter, etc.

            • The words such and exclamative-what can be followed by an indefinite article (as mentioned in the section above).

            • The word many can be used with the indefinite article and a singular noun (many a night, many an awkward moment).

            • The words each and every can be followed by a cardinal number or other expression of definite quantity (each two seats, every five grams of flour).



            ...




            As with other parts of speech, it is often possible to connect determiners of the same type with the conjunctions and and or: his and her children, two or three beans.




            The same answer says that "I drove this my car" is wrong. The form "this" followed by a possessive is now rare, but was once more common, especially in formal writing. In particular sentences such as:




            It is a mistake to regard aspects of this our present society as unchangeable rules.




            were sufficiently common to be a style marker in the writings of the late Robert A Heinlein.



            Since the question title asks about using "two possessives in a row", this can certainly be proper.




            • This was John's father's watch.

            • This was King Mark's wife's cousin's castle.



            are both quite correct.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 1





              Also this my will and this 29th of May 2019 - not common but not wrong. The Wikipedia article is just counting things as determiners that @TannerSwett is not counting, I think. I don't think it is really saying anything different. Anyway our last week's meeting does not come under any of the eight exceptions, as far as I can see, and to me it is so obviously wrong that it would take a lot more than a Wikipedia article to convince me otherwise.

              – Minty
              1 hour ago











            • @Minty then we must agree to differ. I would think "our today's meeting" so odd as to be wrong, but "our last week's meeting" unusual but acceptable, leaving aside the case of Indian English, where it seems to be the usual form.

              – David Siegel
              1 hour ago











            • I can't imagine what logic would permit one of those constructions but not the other. Anyway I think the this... exceptions are more interesting. There must be some explanation but for now it escapes me. I don't think they come from e.g. this (my will, that is).

              – Minty
              1 hour ago











            • @Minty I don't think there is any true logic here, merely a pattern of usage. But then i think the attempt to find a fully logical rule in English grammar is often futile and wrongheaded. I agree that the constructions 'this"+possessive pronoun+noun or noun phrase are interesting, and i don't know their origin.

              – David Siegel
              58 mins ago















            2















            Our last week's meeting




            is a little akward, but I for one do not think that it is incorrect.



            The answer by Tanner Swett says "it's never acceptable for a noun phrase to have more than one determiner." However, the Wikipedia article lists eight different "common" cases where multiple determiners are acceptable. Specifically:




            • A definite determiner can be followed by certain quantifiers (the many problems, these three things, my very few faults).

            • The words all and both can be followed by a definite determiner (all the green apples, both the boys), which can also be followed by a quantifier as above (all the many outstanding issues).

            • The word all can be followed by a cardinal number (all three things).

            • The word some can be followed by a cardinal number (some eight packets, meaning "approximately eight").

            • Words and phrases expressing fractions and multiples, such as half, double, twice, three times, etc. can be followed by a definite determiner: half a minute, double the risk, twice my age, three times my salary, three-quarters the diameter, etc.

            • The words such and exclamative-what can be followed by an indefinite article (as mentioned in the section above).

            • The word many can be used with the indefinite article and a singular noun (many a night, many an awkward moment).

            • The words each and every can be followed by a cardinal number or other expression of definite quantity (each two seats, every five grams of flour).



            ...




            As with other parts of speech, it is often possible to connect determiners of the same type with the conjunctions and and or: his and her children, two or three beans.




            The same answer says that "I drove this my car" is wrong. The form "this" followed by a possessive is now rare, but was once more common, especially in formal writing. In particular sentences such as:




            It is a mistake to regard aspects of this our present society as unchangeable rules.




            were sufficiently common to be a style marker in the writings of the late Robert A Heinlein.



            Since the question title asks about using "two possessives in a row", this can certainly be proper.




            • This was John's father's watch.

            • This was King Mark's wife's cousin's castle.



            are both quite correct.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 1





              Also this my will and this 29th of May 2019 - not common but not wrong. The Wikipedia article is just counting things as determiners that @TannerSwett is not counting, I think. I don't think it is really saying anything different. Anyway our last week's meeting does not come under any of the eight exceptions, as far as I can see, and to me it is so obviously wrong that it would take a lot more than a Wikipedia article to convince me otherwise.

              – Minty
              1 hour ago











            • @Minty then we must agree to differ. I would think "our today's meeting" so odd as to be wrong, but "our last week's meeting" unusual but acceptable, leaving aside the case of Indian English, where it seems to be the usual form.

              – David Siegel
              1 hour ago











            • I can't imagine what logic would permit one of those constructions but not the other. Anyway I think the this... exceptions are more interesting. There must be some explanation but for now it escapes me. I don't think they come from e.g. this (my will, that is).

              – Minty
              1 hour ago











            • @Minty I don't think there is any true logic here, merely a pattern of usage. But then i think the attempt to find a fully logical rule in English grammar is often futile and wrongheaded. I agree that the constructions 'this"+possessive pronoun+noun or noun phrase are interesting, and i don't know their origin.

              – David Siegel
              58 mins ago













            2












            2








            2








            Our last week's meeting




            is a little akward, but I for one do not think that it is incorrect.



            The answer by Tanner Swett says "it's never acceptable for a noun phrase to have more than one determiner." However, the Wikipedia article lists eight different "common" cases where multiple determiners are acceptable. Specifically:




            • A definite determiner can be followed by certain quantifiers (the many problems, these three things, my very few faults).

            • The words all and both can be followed by a definite determiner (all the green apples, both the boys), which can also be followed by a quantifier as above (all the many outstanding issues).

            • The word all can be followed by a cardinal number (all three things).

            • The word some can be followed by a cardinal number (some eight packets, meaning "approximately eight").

            • Words and phrases expressing fractions and multiples, such as half, double, twice, three times, etc. can be followed by a definite determiner: half a minute, double the risk, twice my age, three times my salary, three-quarters the diameter, etc.

            • The words such and exclamative-what can be followed by an indefinite article (as mentioned in the section above).

            • The word many can be used with the indefinite article and a singular noun (many a night, many an awkward moment).

            • The words each and every can be followed by a cardinal number or other expression of definite quantity (each two seats, every five grams of flour).



            ...




            As with other parts of speech, it is often possible to connect determiners of the same type with the conjunctions and and or: his and her children, two or three beans.




            The same answer says that "I drove this my car" is wrong. The form "this" followed by a possessive is now rare, but was once more common, especially in formal writing. In particular sentences such as:




            It is a mistake to regard aspects of this our present society as unchangeable rules.




            were sufficiently common to be a style marker in the writings of the late Robert A Heinlein.



            Since the question title asks about using "two possessives in a row", this can certainly be proper.




            • This was John's father's watch.

            • This was King Mark's wife's cousin's castle.



            are both quite correct.






            share|improve this answer
















            Our last week's meeting




            is a little akward, but I for one do not think that it is incorrect.



            The answer by Tanner Swett says "it's never acceptable for a noun phrase to have more than one determiner." However, the Wikipedia article lists eight different "common" cases where multiple determiners are acceptable. Specifically:




            • A definite determiner can be followed by certain quantifiers (the many problems, these three things, my very few faults).

            • The words all and both can be followed by a definite determiner (all the green apples, both the boys), which can also be followed by a quantifier as above (all the many outstanding issues).

            • The word all can be followed by a cardinal number (all three things).

            • The word some can be followed by a cardinal number (some eight packets, meaning "approximately eight").

            • Words and phrases expressing fractions and multiples, such as half, double, twice, three times, etc. can be followed by a definite determiner: half a minute, double the risk, twice my age, three times my salary, three-quarters the diameter, etc.

            • The words such and exclamative-what can be followed by an indefinite article (as mentioned in the section above).

            • The word many can be used with the indefinite article and a singular noun (many a night, many an awkward moment).

            • The words each and every can be followed by a cardinal number or other expression of definite quantity (each two seats, every five grams of flour).



            ...




            As with other parts of speech, it is often possible to connect determiners of the same type with the conjunctions and and or: his and her children, two or three beans.




            The same answer says that "I drove this my car" is wrong. The form "this" followed by a possessive is now rare, but was once more common, especially in formal writing. In particular sentences such as:




            It is a mistake to regard aspects of this our present society as unchangeable rules.




            were sufficiently common to be a style marker in the writings of the late Robert A Heinlein.



            Since the question title asks about using "two possessives in a row", this can certainly be proper.




            • This was John's father's watch.

            • This was King Mark's wife's cousin's castle.



            are both quite correct.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 3 hours ago

























            answered 3 hours ago









            David SiegelDavid Siegel

            7,147825




            7,147825







            • 1





              Also this my will and this 29th of May 2019 - not common but not wrong. The Wikipedia article is just counting things as determiners that @TannerSwett is not counting, I think. I don't think it is really saying anything different. Anyway our last week's meeting does not come under any of the eight exceptions, as far as I can see, and to me it is so obviously wrong that it would take a lot more than a Wikipedia article to convince me otherwise.

              – Minty
              1 hour ago











            • @Minty then we must agree to differ. I would think "our today's meeting" so odd as to be wrong, but "our last week's meeting" unusual but acceptable, leaving aside the case of Indian English, where it seems to be the usual form.

              – David Siegel
              1 hour ago











            • I can't imagine what logic would permit one of those constructions but not the other. Anyway I think the this... exceptions are more interesting. There must be some explanation but for now it escapes me. I don't think they come from e.g. this (my will, that is).

              – Minty
              1 hour ago











            • @Minty I don't think there is any true logic here, merely a pattern of usage. But then i think the attempt to find a fully logical rule in English grammar is often futile and wrongheaded. I agree that the constructions 'this"+possessive pronoun+noun or noun phrase are interesting, and i don't know their origin.

              – David Siegel
              58 mins ago












            • 1





              Also this my will and this 29th of May 2019 - not common but not wrong. The Wikipedia article is just counting things as determiners that @TannerSwett is not counting, I think. I don't think it is really saying anything different. Anyway our last week's meeting does not come under any of the eight exceptions, as far as I can see, and to me it is so obviously wrong that it would take a lot more than a Wikipedia article to convince me otherwise.

              – Minty
              1 hour ago











            • @Minty then we must agree to differ. I would think "our today's meeting" so odd as to be wrong, but "our last week's meeting" unusual but acceptable, leaving aside the case of Indian English, where it seems to be the usual form.

              – David Siegel
              1 hour ago











            • I can't imagine what logic would permit one of those constructions but not the other. Anyway I think the this... exceptions are more interesting. There must be some explanation but for now it escapes me. I don't think they come from e.g. this (my will, that is).

              – Minty
              1 hour ago











            • @Minty I don't think there is any true logic here, merely a pattern of usage. But then i think the attempt to find a fully logical rule in English grammar is often futile and wrongheaded. I agree that the constructions 'this"+possessive pronoun+noun or noun phrase are interesting, and i don't know their origin.

              – David Siegel
              58 mins ago







            1




            1





            Also this my will and this 29th of May 2019 - not common but not wrong. The Wikipedia article is just counting things as determiners that @TannerSwett is not counting, I think. I don't think it is really saying anything different. Anyway our last week's meeting does not come under any of the eight exceptions, as far as I can see, and to me it is so obviously wrong that it would take a lot more than a Wikipedia article to convince me otherwise.

            – Minty
            1 hour ago





            Also this my will and this 29th of May 2019 - not common but not wrong. The Wikipedia article is just counting things as determiners that @TannerSwett is not counting, I think. I don't think it is really saying anything different. Anyway our last week's meeting does not come under any of the eight exceptions, as far as I can see, and to me it is so obviously wrong that it would take a lot more than a Wikipedia article to convince me otherwise.

            – Minty
            1 hour ago













            @Minty then we must agree to differ. I would think "our today's meeting" so odd as to be wrong, but "our last week's meeting" unusual but acceptable, leaving aside the case of Indian English, where it seems to be the usual form.

            – David Siegel
            1 hour ago





            @Minty then we must agree to differ. I would think "our today's meeting" so odd as to be wrong, but "our last week's meeting" unusual but acceptable, leaving aside the case of Indian English, where it seems to be the usual form.

            – David Siegel
            1 hour ago













            I can't imagine what logic would permit one of those constructions but not the other. Anyway I think the this... exceptions are more interesting. There must be some explanation but for now it escapes me. I don't think they come from e.g. this (my will, that is).

            – Minty
            1 hour ago





            I can't imagine what logic would permit one of those constructions but not the other. Anyway I think the this... exceptions are more interesting. There must be some explanation but for now it escapes me. I don't think they come from e.g. this (my will, that is).

            – Minty
            1 hour ago













            @Minty I don't think there is any true logic here, merely a pattern of usage. But then i think the attempt to find a fully logical rule in English grammar is often futile and wrongheaded. I agree that the constructions 'this"+possessive pronoun+noun or noun phrase are interesting, and i don't know their origin.

            – David Siegel
            58 mins ago





            @Minty I don't think there is any true logic here, merely a pattern of usage. But then i think the attempt to find a fully logical rule in English grammar is often futile and wrongheaded. I agree that the constructions 'this"+possessive pronoun+noun or noun phrase are interesting, and i don't know their origin.

            – David Siegel
            58 mins ago











            0














            It's either:




            Last week's meeting




            or:




            Our meeting last week




            but I agree with your teacher that:




            Our last week's meeting




            sounds awkward and should probably be avoided.






            share|improve this answer



























              0














              It's either:




              Last week's meeting




              or:




              Our meeting last week




              but I agree with your teacher that:




              Our last week's meeting




              sounds awkward and should probably be avoided.






              share|improve this answer

























                0












                0








                0







                It's either:




                Last week's meeting




                or:




                Our meeting last week




                but I agree with your teacher that:




                Our last week's meeting




                sounds awkward and should probably be avoided.






                share|improve this answer













                It's either:




                Last week's meeting




                or:




                Our meeting last week




                but I agree with your teacher that:




                Our last week's meeting




                sounds awkward and should probably be avoided.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 5 hours ago









                J.R.J.R.

                101k8131251




                101k8131251



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212566%2fis-there-a-rule-that-prohibits-us-from-using-2-possessives-in-a-row%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                    Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                    199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單