Difference between antennas for wifi vs ham repeatersHow can I safely transmit without an antenna tuner or SWR meter?Theoretical Wifi antenna not working for the expected rangeRSSI on both ends of UHF Point to Point network do not matchWhat is the difference between “Cross Polarized” vs “Circularly Polarized” Antennas?What is the point of high gain antenna with respect to the maximum EIRPWhat kind of 2 meter antenna is this?Slot antenna for 2 meter mobileTurn 75 Ω TV “Rabbit Ears” with a balun into a 50 Ω dipole antennaWhere can I find a very long distance Wifi antenna with a range of 50-100 km? Or is it a DIY project?Yagi vs Parabolic Dish for 2.4GHz Campus Wifi from 1,800ft away?
Select row of data if next row contains zero
Can a helicopter mask itself from Radar?
Is it possible to change original filename of an exe?
If Sweden was to magically float away, at what altitude would it be visible from the southern hemisphere?
Creating Fictional Slavic Place Names
Points within polygons in different projections
What is the indigenous Russian word for a wild boar?
Differences between “pas vrai ?”, “c’est ça ?”, “hein ?”, and “n’est-ce pas ?”
Looking after a wayward brother in mother's will
Preserving culinary oils
What does "Marchentalender" on the front of a postcard mean?
What are the slash markings on Gatwick's 08R/26L?
What is game ban VS VAC ban in steam?
Expenditure in Poland - Forex doesn't have Zloty
When a current flow in an inductor is interrupted, what limits the voltage rise?
Beginner's snake game using PyGame
Understanding STM32 datasheet regarding decoupling capacitors
Modern approach to radio buttons
Using PCA vs Linear Regression
Geometry affects line breaking
How can I grammatically understand "Wir über uns"?
Can a non-EU citizen travel within the Schengen area without identity documents?
The qvolume of an integer
How to properly maintain eye contact with people that have distinctive facial features?
Difference between antennas for wifi vs ham repeaters
How can I safely transmit without an antenna tuner or SWR meter?Theoretical Wifi antenna not working for the expected rangeRSSI on both ends of UHF Point to Point network do not matchWhat is the difference between “Cross Polarized” vs “Circularly Polarized” Antennas?What is the point of high gain antenna with respect to the maximum EIRPWhat kind of 2 meter antenna is this?Slot antenna for 2 meter mobileTurn 75 Ω TV “Rabbit Ears” with a balun into a 50 Ω dipole antennaWhere can I find a very long distance Wifi antenna with a range of 50-100 km? Or is it a DIY project?Yagi vs Parabolic Dish for 2.4GHz Campus Wifi from 1,800ft away?
$begingroup$
I understand that wifi transmits on 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz whereas local ham repeaters transmit around 147 MHz or 450 MHz. What differences would be needed in antennas tuning into either of these frequencies, to account for the difference in frequencies, either wifi or the ham repeaters?
For example, let's say I'm getting or building a yagi antenna to pickup a distant wifi signal better, and I also want a yagi antenna to better listen to (even better if also transmit) a distant ham repeater station. Could I use the same yagi for both purposes, or if not, how should the two yagis differ to best work with the different purposes? In that example, let's say for wifi I'd plug the antenna into a USB wireless adaptor in a PC, whereas for the ham repeaters I'd plug the antenna into a transceiver e.g. a simple Baofeng HT.
antenna wifi range repeater-coverage
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I understand that wifi transmits on 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz whereas local ham repeaters transmit around 147 MHz or 450 MHz. What differences would be needed in antennas tuning into either of these frequencies, to account for the difference in frequencies, either wifi or the ham repeaters?
For example, let's say I'm getting or building a yagi antenna to pickup a distant wifi signal better, and I also want a yagi antenna to better listen to (even better if also transmit) a distant ham repeater station. Could I use the same yagi for both purposes, or if not, how should the two yagis differ to best work with the different purposes? In that example, let's say for wifi I'd plug the antenna into a USB wireless adaptor in a PC, whereas for the ham repeaters I'd plug the antenna into a transceiver e.g. a simple Baofeng HT.
antenna wifi range repeater-coverage
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I understand that wifi transmits on 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz whereas local ham repeaters transmit around 147 MHz or 450 MHz. What differences would be needed in antennas tuning into either of these frequencies, to account for the difference in frequencies, either wifi or the ham repeaters?
For example, let's say I'm getting or building a yagi antenna to pickup a distant wifi signal better, and I also want a yagi antenna to better listen to (even better if also transmit) a distant ham repeater station. Could I use the same yagi for both purposes, or if not, how should the two yagis differ to best work with the different purposes? In that example, let's say for wifi I'd plug the antenna into a USB wireless adaptor in a PC, whereas for the ham repeaters I'd plug the antenna into a transceiver e.g. a simple Baofeng HT.
antenna wifi range repeater-coverage
New contributor
$endgroup$
I understand that wifi transmits on 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz whereas local ham repeaters transmit around 147 MHz or 450 MHz. What differences would be needed in antennas tuning into either of these frequencies, to account for the difference in frequencies, either wifi or the ham repeaters?
For example, let's say I'm getting or building a yagi antenna to pickup a distant wifi signal better, and I also want a yagi antenna to better listen to (even better if also transmit) a distant ham repeater station. Could I use the same yagi for both purposes, or if not, how should the two yagis differ to best work with the different purposes? In that example, let's say for wifi I'd plug the antenna into a USB wireless adaptor in a PC, whereas for the ham repeaters I'd plug the antenna into a transceiver e.g. a simple Baofeng HT.
antenna wifi range repeater-coverage
antenna wifi range repeater-coverage
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
cr0cr0
1063
1063
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In order to use the same antenna design at different frequencies, "all you need to do" is scale all elements of the antenna proportionally to the difference in wavelength. For example, if you take a Yagi antenna designed for around 150 MHz, and scale all of the lengths in its design down by half, you will have a Yagi antenna good for 300 MHz.
Of course, there's no “resize” button on physical objects, so you have to build two separate antennas instead. And there may be mechanical limitations (e.g. the thickness of sufficiently strong wires) that mean a design doesn't physically scale perfectly.
If you use an antenna at a frequency/wavelength that is too far off from what it was designed for, two things will happen:
It will have a different impedance at the feed point (the connection to the transmitter). This means that the RF energy will not be efficiently transferred into/out of the antenna, and it may damage a transmitter. (For receivers, this is not usually critical.)
The radiation pattern will be not as designed. Generally, a directional antenna will not be as directional — instead of "pointing" in one direction, it will have a spiky pattern with many highs and lows.
It is not impossible to have a directional antenna which works for two different frequency bands. But it must be designed specifically for that pair. And unless physical space is an issue (as with HF antennas which work with long wavelengths and therefore are themselves quite large), it is simpler to use two separate antennas with standard designs, if a suitable multi-band design is not already available.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "520"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
cr0 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f14610%2fdifference-between-antennas-for-wifi-vs-ham-repeaters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In order to use the same antenna design at different frequencies, "all you need to do" is scale all elements of the antenna proportionally to the difference in wavelength. For example, if you take a Yagi antenna designed for around 150 MHz, and scale all of the lengths in its design down by half, you will have a Yagi antenna good for 300 MHz.
Of course, there's no “resize” button on physical objects, so you have to build two separate antennas instead. And there may be mechanical limitations (e.g. the thickness of sufficiently strong wires) that mean a design doesn't physically scale perfectly.
If you use an antenna at a frequency/wavelength that is too far off from what it was designed for, two things will happen:
It will have a different impedance at the feed point (the connection to the transmitter). This means that the RF energy will not be efficiently transferred into/out of the antenna, and it may damage a transmitter. (For receivers, this is not usually critical.)
The radiation pattern will be not as designed. Generally, a directional antenna will not be as directional — instead of "pointing" in one direction, it will have a spiky pattern with many highs and lows.
It is not impossible to have a directional antenna which works for two different frequency bands. But it must be designed specifically for that pair. And unless physical space is an issue (as with HF antennas which work with long wavelengths and therefore are themselves quite large), it is simpler to use two separate antennas with standard designs, if a suitable multi-band design is not already available.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In order to use the same antenna design at different frequencies, "all you need to do" is scale all elements of the antenna proportionally to the difference in wavelength. For example, if you take a Yagi antenna designed for around 150 MHz, and scale all of the lengths in its design down by half, you will have a Yagi antenna good for 300 MHz.
Of course, there's no “resize” button on physical objects, so you have to build two separate antennas instead. And there may be mechanical limitations (e.g. the thickness of sufficiently strong wires) that mean a design doesn't physically scale perfectly.
If you use an antenna at a frequency/wavelength that is too far off from what it was designed for, two things will happen:
It will have a different impedance at the feed point (the connection to the transmitter). This means that the RF energy will not be efficiently transferred into/out of the antenna, and it may damage a transmitter. (For receivers, this is not usually critical.)
The radiation pattern will be not as designed. Generally, a directional antenna will not be as directional — instead of "pointing" in one direction, it will have a spiky pattern with many highs and lows.
It is not impossible to have a directional antenna which works for two different frequency bands. But it must be designed specifically for that pair. And unless physical space is an issue (as with HF antennas which work with long wavelengths and therefore are themselves quite large), it is simpler to use two separate antennas with standard designs, if a suitable multi-band design is not already available.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In order to use the same antenna design at different frequencies, "all you need to do" is scale all elements of the antenna proportionally to the difference in wavelength. For example, if you take a Yagi antenna designed for around 150 MHz, and scale all of the lengths in its design down by half, you will have a Yagi antenna good for 300 MHz.
Of course, there's no “resize” button on physical objects, so you have to build two separate antennas instead. And there may be mechanical limitations (e.g. the thickness of sufficiently strong wires) that mean a design doesn't physically scale perfectly.
If you use an antenna at a frequency/wavelength that is too far off from what it was designed for, two things will happen:
It will have a different impedance at the feed point (the connection to the transmitter). This means that the RF energy will not be efficiently transferred into/out of the antenna, and it may damage a transmitter. (For receivers, this is not usually critical.)
The radiation pattern will be not as designed. Generally, a directional antenna will not be as directional — instead of "pointing" in one direction, it will have a spiky pattern with many highs and lows.
It is not impossible to have a directional antenna which works for two different frequency bands. But it must be designed specifically for that pair. And unless physical space is an issue (as with HF antennas which work with long wavelengths and therefore are themselves quite large), it is simpler to use two separate antennas with standard designs, if a suitable multi-band design is not already available.
$endgroup$
In order to use the same antenna design at different frequencies, "all you need to do" is scale all elements of the antenna proportionally to the difference in wavelength. For example, if you take a Yagi antenna designed for around 150 MHz, and scale all of the lengths in its design down by half, you will have a Yagi antenna good for 300 MHz.
Of course, there's no “resize” button on physical objects, so you have to build two separate antennas instead. And there may be mechanical limitations (e.g. the thickness of sufficiently strong wires) that mean a design doesn't physically scale perfectly.
If you use an antenna at a frequency/wavelength that is too far off from what it was designed for, two things will happen:
It will have a different impedance at the feed point (the connection to the transmitter). This means that the RF energy will not be efficiently transferred into/out of the antenna, and it may damage a transmitter. (For receivers, this is not usually critical.)
The radiation pattern will be not as designed. Generally, a directional antenna will not be as directional — instead of "pointing" in one direction, it will have a spiky pattern with many highs and lows.
It is not impossible to have a directional antenna which works for two different frequency bands. But it must be designed specifically for that pair. And unless physical space is an issue (as with HF antennas which work with long wavelengths and therefore are themselves quite large), it is simpler to use two separate antennas with standard designs, if a suitable multi-band design is not already available.
answered 8 hours ago
Kevin Reid AG6YO♦Kevin Reid AG6YO
16.8k33272
16.8k33272
add a comment |
add a comment |
cr0 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
cr0 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
cr0 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
cr0 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Amateur Radio Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f14610%2fdifference-between-antennas-for-wifi-vs-ham-repeaters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown