Can there be an atomic nucleus where there are more protons than neutrons?Which experiments prove atomic theory?What enables protons to give new properties to an atom every time one is added?Which is larger, all known, bound nuclear energy levels, or known, bound atomic energy levels?How did we discover that hydrogen has 1 proton?Atomic structure in Quantum Field TheoryWhat keeps quarks separate (strong force pulls, but what repels to equal out)Term symbols and Pauli principleWhy are helium and lithium so different, while lithium and beryllium are similar?

Paper status "Accept with Shepherd". What does it really mean?

What is this game with a red cricket pushing a ball?

Is it possible to cross Arctic Ocean on ski/kayak undetectable now?

A fast aquatic predator with multiple eyes and pupils. Would these eyes be possible?

How did Ron get five hundred Chocolate Frog cards?

Is there any restriction in entering the South American countries multiple times in one year?

Can there be an atomic nucleus where there are more protons than neutrons?

How to protect my Wi-Fi password from being displayed by Android phones when sharing it with QR code?

How can a company compel a W2 employee to sign a non-compete agreement?

Why does 1.1.1.1 not resolve archive.is?

"A tin of biscuits" vs "A biscuit tin"

If the music alphabet had more than 7 letters would octaves still sound like the same note?

What is the fastest algorithm for finding the natural logarithm of a big number?

Possible omission of a relative pronoun in the beginning of a clause?

Simple way to make circular arrow arc?

Displaying characteristics of the Hero in a console game

I’m having a hard time deciding whether this is a redemption arc

What is the design rationale for having armor and magic penetration mechanics?

Pass a bash variable to python script

Conveying the idea of "It's piece of cake" by "simple comme bonjour" or "bête comme chou"

Is Having my Players Control Two Parties a Good Idea?

Installing helm-projectile results in "mapc: Lisp nesting exceeds ‘max-lisp-eval-depth’"

SuperTuxKart 0.9.3-2 has no online multiplayer?

Does a reincarnated Draconic Bloodline Sorcerer save his class abilities?



Can there be an atomic nucleus where there are more protons than neutrons?


Which experiments prove atomic theory?What enables protons to give new properties to an atom every time one is added?Which is larger, all known, bound nuclear energy levels, or known, bound atomic energy levels?How did we discover that hydrogen has 1 proton?Atomic structure in Quantum Field TheoryWhat keeps quarks separate (strong force pulls, but what repels to equal out)Term symbols and Pauli principleWhy are helium and lithium so different, while lithium and beryllium are similar?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









3














$begingroup$


Well, the question says it all.
As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei.
But is their any possibility that there exists a nucleus where the number of protons exceeds number of neutrons (apart of course, from the trivial case of Hydrogen)?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



overkill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$











  • 4




    $begingroup$
    "As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei." - I don't understand how you came to this belief. The very first element in the periodic table forms atoms with one proton and no neutron...
    $endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    11 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Did you check the periodic table? Some prior research is required.
    $endgroup$
    – my2cts
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How about a neutron star? It isn't an atomic nucleus, but it is more neutrons than protons.
    $endgroup$
    – mmesser314
    10 hours ago

















3














$begingroup$


Well, the question says it all.
As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei.
But is their any possibility that there exists a nucleus where the number of protons exceeds number of neutrons (apart of course, from the trivial case of Hydrogen)?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



overkill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$











  • 4




    $begingroup$
    "As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei." - I don't understand how you came to this belief. The very first element in the periodic table forms atoms with one proton and no neutron...
    $endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    11 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Did you check the periodic table? Some prior research is required.
    $endgroup$
    – my2cts
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How about a neutron star? It isn't an atomic nucleus, but it is more neutrons than protons.
    $endgroup$
    – mmesser314
    10 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$


Well, the question says it all.
As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei.
But is their any possibility that there exists a nucleus where the number of protons exceeds number of neutrons (apart of course, from the trivial case of Hydrogen)?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



overkill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




Well, the question says it all.
As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei.
But is their any possibility that there exists a nucleus where the number of protons exceeds number of neutrons (apart of course, from the trivial case of Hydrogen)?







atomic-physics






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



overkill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



overkill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question



share|cite|improve this question








edited 10 hours ago









lurscher

8,1332 gold badges31 silver badges92 bronze badges




8,1332 gold badges31 silver badges92 bronze badges






New contributor



overkill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 11 hours ago









overkilloverkill

241 bronze badge




241 bronze badge




New contributor



overkill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




overkill is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    "As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei." - I don't understand how you came to this belief. The very first element in the periodic table forms atoms with one proton and no neutron...
    $endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    11 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Did you check the periodic table? Some prior research is required.
    $endgroup$
    – my2cts
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How about a neutron star? It isn't an atomic nucleus, but it is more neutrons than protons.
    $endgroup$
    – mmesser314
    10 hours ago












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    "As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei." - I don't understand how you came to this belief. The very first element in the periodic table forms atoms with one proton and no neutron...
    $endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    11 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Did you check the periodic table? Some prior research is required.
    $endgroup$
    – my2cts
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How about a neutron star? It isn't an atomic nucleus, but it is more neutrons than protons.
    $endgroup$
    – mmesser314
    10 hours ago







4




4




$begingroup$
"As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei." - I don't understand how you came to this belief. The very first element in the periodic table forms atoms with one proton and no neutron...
$endgroup$
– ACuriousMind
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
"As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei." - I don't understand how you came to this belief. The very first element in the periodic table forms atoms with one proton and no neutron...
$endgroup$
– ACuriousMind
11 hours ago




4




4




$begingroup$
Did you check the periodic table? Some prior research is required.
$endgroup$
– my2cts
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
Did you check the periodic table? Some prior research is required.
$endgroup$
– my2cts
11 hours ago












$begingroup$
How about a neutron star? It isn't an atomic nucleus, but it is more neutrons than protons.
$endgroup$
– mmesser314
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
How about a neutron star? It isn't an atomic nucleus, but it is more neutrons than protons.
$endgroup$
– mmesser314
10 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8
















$begingroup$

According to Wikipedia:




Other than protium (ordinary hydrogen), helium-3 is the only stable isotope of any element with more protons than neutrons.







share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    The OP didn't ask about stable nuclei.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Crowell
    11 mins ago


















-3
















$begingroup$

Nothing apart from Hydrogen. Anything bigger with more protons than neutron would have too much inter-nuclear repulsion to stay together as a single unit. The strong nuclear force which holds the nucleons together would be overwhelmed by the electrostatic forces between the protons.






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Helium-3 is stable and has two protons and one neutron.
    $endgroup$
    – tparker
    10 hours ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);







overkill is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506716%2fcan-there-be-an-atomic-nucleus-where-there-are-more-protons-than-neutrons%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown


























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8
















$begingroup$

According to Wikipedia:




Other than protium (ordinary hydrogen), helium-3 is the only stable isotope of any element with more protons than neutrons.







share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    The OP didn't ask about stable nuclei.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Crowell
    11 mins ago















8
















$begingroup$

According to Wikipedia:




Other than protium (ordinary hydrogen), helium-3 is the only stable isotope of any element with more protons than neutrons.







share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    The OP didn't ask about stable nuclei.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Crowell
    11 mins ago













8














8










8







$begingroup$

According to Wikipedia:




Other than protium (ordinary hydrogen), helium-3 is the only stable isotope of any element with more protons than neutrons.







share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$



According to Wikipedia:




Other than protium (ordinary hydrogen), helium-3 is the only stable isotope of any element with more protons than neutrons.








share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer




share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 10 hours ago









tparkertparker

26.2k1 gold badge55 silver badges138 bronze badges




26.2k1 gold badge55 silver badges138 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    The OP didn't ask about stable nuclei.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Crowell
    11 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    The OP didn't ask about stable nuclei.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Crowell
    11 mins ago















$begingroup$
The OP didn't ask about stable nuclei.
$endgroup$
– Ben Crowell
11 mins ago




$begingroup$
The OP didn't ask about stable nuclei.
$endgroup$
– Ben Crowell
11 mins ago













-3
















$begingroup$

Nothing apart from Hydrogen. Anything bigger with more protons than neutron would have too much inter-nuclear repulsion to stay together as a single unit. The strong nuclear force which holds the nucleons together would be overwhelmed by the electrostatic forces between the protons.






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Helium-3 is stable and has two protons and one neutron.
    $endgroup$
    – tparker
    10 hours ago















-3
















$begingroup$

Nothing apart from Hydrogen. Anything bigger with more protons than neutron would have too much inter-nuclear repulsion to stay together as a single unit. The strong nuclear force which holds the nucleons together would be overwhelmed by the electrostatic forces between the protons.






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Helium-3 is stable and has two protons and one neutron.
    $endgroup$
    – tparker
    10 hours ago













-3














-3










-3







$begingroup$

Nothing apart from Hydrogen. Anything bigger with more protons than neutron would have too much inter-nuclear repulsion to stay together as a single unit. The strong nuclear force which holds the nucleons together would be overwhelmed by the electrostatic forces between the protons.






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$



Nothing apart from Hydrogen. Anything bigger with more protons than neutron would have too much inter-nuclear repulsion to stay together as a single unit. The strong nuclear force which holds the nucleons together would be overwhelmed by the electrostatic forces between the protons.







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer




share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 10 hours ago









SamSam

3976 bronze badges




3976 bronze badges










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Helium-3 is stable and has two protons and one neutron.
    $endgroup$
    – tparker
    10 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Helium-3 is stable and has two protons and one neutron.
    $endgroup$
    – tparker
    10 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
Helium-3 is stable and has two protons and one neutron.
$endgroup$
– tparker
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
Helium-3 is stable and has two protons and one neutron.
$endgroup$
– tparker
10 hours ago











overkill is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded

















overkill is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












overkill is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











overkill is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506716%2fcan-there-be-an-atomic-nucleus-where-there-are-more-protons-than-neutrons%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown









Popular posts from this blog

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單