Can there be an atomic nucleus where there are more protons than neutrons?Which experiments prove atomic theory?What enables protons to give new properties to an atom every time one is added?Which is larger, all known, bound nuclear energy levels, or known, bound atomic energy levels?How did we discover that hydrogen has 1 proton?Atomic structure in Quantum Field TheoryWhat keeps quarks separate (strong force pulls, but what repels to equal out)Term symbols and Pauli principleWhy are helium and lithium so different, while lithium and beryllium are similar?
Paper status "Accept with Shepherd". What does it really mean?
What is this game with a red cricket pushing a ball?
Is it possible to cross Arctic Ocean on ski/kayak undetectable now?
A fast aquatic predator with multiple eyes and pupils. Would these eyes be possible?
How did Ron get five hundred Chocolate Frog cards?
Is there any restriction in entering the South American countries multiple times in one year?
Can there be an atomic nucleus where there are more protons than neutrons?
How to protect my Wi-Fi password from being displayed by Android phones when sharing it with QR code?
How can a company compel a W2 employee to sign a non-compete agreement?
Why does 1.1.1.1 not resolve archive.is?
"A tin of biscuits" vs "A biscuit tin"
If the music alphabet had more than 7 letters would octaves still sound like the same note?
What is the fastest algorithm for finding the natural logarithm of a big number?
Possible omission of a relative pronoun in the beginning of a clause?
Simple way to make circular arrow arc?
Displaying characteristics of the Hero in a console game
I’m having a hard time deciding whether this is a redemption arc
What is the design rationale for having armor and magic penetration mechanics?
Pass a bash variable to python script
Conveying the idea of "It's piece of cake" by "simple comme bonjour" or "bête comme chou"
Is Having my Players Control Two Parties a Good Idea?
Installing helm-projectile results in "mapc: Lisp nesting exceeds ‘max-lisp-eval-depth’"
SuperTuxKart 0.9.3-2 has no online multiplayer?
Does a reincarnated Draconic Bloodline Sorcerer save his class abilities?
Can there be an atomic nucleus where there are more protons than neutrons?
Which experiments prove atomic theory?What enables protons to give new properties to an atom every time one is added?Which is larger, all known, bound nuclear energy levels, or known, bound atomic energy levels?How did we discover that hydrogen has 1 proton?Atomic structure in Quantum Field TheoryWhat keeps quarks separate (strong force pulls, but what repels to equal out)Term symbols and Pauli principleWhy are helium and lithium so different, while lithium and beryllium are similar?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Well, the question says it all.
As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei.
But is their any possibility that there exists a nucleus where the number of protons exceeds number of neutrons (apart of course, from the trivial case of Hydrogen)?
atomic-physics
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Well, the question says it all.
As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei.
But is their any possibility that there exists a nucleus where the number of protons exceeds number of neutrons (apart of course, from the trivial case of Hydrogen)?
atomic-physics
New contributor
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
"As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei." - I don't understand how you came to this belief. The very first element in the periodic table forms atoms with one proton and no neutron...
$endgroup$
– ACuriousMind♦
11 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Did you check the periodic table? Some prior research is required.
$endgroup$
– my2cts
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
How about a neutron star? It isn't an atomic nucleus, but it is more neutrons than protons.
$endgroup$
– mmesser314
10 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Well, the question says it all.
As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei.
But is their any possibility that there exists a nucleus where the number of protons exceeds number of neutrons (apart of course, from the trivial case of Hydrogen)?
atomic-physics
New contributor
$endgroup$
Well, the question says it all.
As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei.
But is their any possibility that there exists a nucleus where the number of protons exceeds number of neutrons (apart of course, from the trivial case of Hydrogen)?
atomic-physics
atomic-physics
New contributor
New contributor
edited 10 hours ago
lurscher
8,1332 gold badges31 silver badges92 bronze badges
8,1332 gold badges31 silver badges92 bronze badges
New contributor
asked 11 hours ago
overkilloverkill
241 bronze badge
241 bronze badge
New contributor
New contributor
4
$begingroup$
"As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei." - I don't understand how you came to this belief. The very first element in the periodic table forms atoms with one proton and no neutron...
$endgroup$
– ACuriousMind♦
11 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Did you check the periodic table? Some prior research is required.
$endgroup$
– my2cts
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
How about a neutron star? It isn't an atomic nucleus, but it is more neutrons than protons.
$endgroup$
– mmesser314
10 hours ago
add a comment
|
4
$begingroup$
"As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei." - I don't understand how you came to this belief. The very first element in the periodic table forms atoms with one proton and no neutron...
$endgroup$
– ACuriousMind♦
11 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Did you check the periodic table? Some prior research is required.
$endgroup$
– my2cts
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
How about a neutron star? It isn't an atomic nucleus, but it is more neutrons than protons.
$endgroup$
– mmesser314
10 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
"As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei." - I don't understand how you came to this belief. The very first element in the periodic table forms atoms with one proton and no neutron...
$endgroup$
– ACuriousMind♦
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
"As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei." - I don't understand how you came to this belief. The very first element in the periodic table forms atoms with one proton and no neutron...
$endgroup$
– ACuriousMind♦
11 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
Did you check the periodic table? Some prior research is required.
$endgroup$
– my2cts
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Did you check the periodic table? Some prior research is required.
$endgroup$
– my2cts
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
How about a neutron star? It isn't an atomic nucleus, but it is more neutrons than protons.
$endgroup$
– mmesser314
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
How about a neutron star? It isn't an atomic nucleus, but it is more neutrons than protons.
$endgroup$
– mmesser314
10 hours ago
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
According to Wikipedia:
Other than protium (ordinary hydrogen), helium-3 is the only stable isotope of any element with more protons than neutrons.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The OP didn't ask about stable nuclei.
$endgroup$
– Ben Crowell
11 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Nothing apart from Hydrogen. Anything bigger with more protons than neutron would have too much inter-nuclear repulsion to stay together as a single unit. The strong nuclear force which holds the nucleons together would be overwhelmed by the electrostatic forces between the protons.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Helium-3 is stable and has two protons and one neutron.
$endgroup$
– tparker
10 hours ago
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
overkill is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506716%2fcan-there-be-an-atomic-nucleus-where-there-are-more-protons-than-neutrons%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
According to Wikipedia:
Other than protium (ordinary hydrogen), helium-3 is the only stable isotope of any element with more protons than neutrons.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The OP didn't ask about stable nuclei.
$endgroup$
– Ben Crowell
11 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
According to Wikipedia:
Other than protium (ordinary hydrogen), helium-3 is the only stable isotope of any element with more protons than neutrons.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The OP didn't ask about stable nuclei.
$endgroup$
– Ben Crowell
11 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
According to Wikipedia:
Other than protium (ordinary hydrogen), helium-3 is the only stable isotope of any element with more protons than neutrons.
$endgroup$
According to Wikipedia:
Other than protium (ordinary hydrogen), helium-3 is the only stable isotope of any element with more protons than neutrons.
answered 10 hours ago
tparkertparker
26.2k1 gold badge55 silver badges138 bronze badges
26.2k1 gold badge55 silver badges138 bronze badges
$begingroup$
The OP didn't ask about stable nuclei.
$endgroup$
– Ben Crowell
11 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The OP didn't ask about stable nuclei.
$endgroup$
– Ben Crowell
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
The OP didn't ask about stable nuclei.
$endgroup$
– Ben Crowell
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
The OP didn't ask about stable nuclei.
$endgroup$
– Ben Crowell
11 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Nothing apart from Hydrogen. Anything bigger with more protons than neutron would have too much inter-nuclear repulsion to stay together as a single unit. The strong nuclear force which holds the nucleons together would be overwhelmed by the electrostatic forces between the protons.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Helium-3 is stable and has two protons and one neutron.
$endgroup$
– tparker
10 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Nothing apart from Hydrogen. Anything bigger with more protons than neutron would have too much inter-nuclear repulsion to stay together as a single unit. The strong nuclear force which holds the nucleons together would be overwhelmed by the electrostatic forces between the protons.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Helium-3 is stable and has two protons and one neutron.
$endgroup$
– tparker
10 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Nothing apart from Hydrogen. Anything bigger with more protons than neutron would have too much inter-nuclear repulsion to stay together as a single unit. The strong nuclear force which holds the nucleons together would be overwhelmed by the electrostatic forces between the protons.
$endgroup$
Nothing apart from Hydrogen. Anything bigger with more protons than neutron would have too much inter-nuclear repulsion to stay together as a single unit. The strong nuclear force which holds the nucleons together would be overwhelmed by the electrostatic forces between the protons.
answered 10 hours ago
SamSam
3976 bronze badges
3976 bronze badges
2
$begingroup$
Helium-3 is stable and has two protons and one neutron.
$endgroup$
– tparker
10 hours ago
add a comment
|
2
$begingroup$
Helium-3 is stable and has two protons and one neutron.
$endgroup$
– tparker
10 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Helium-3 is stable and has two protons and one neutron.
$endgroup$
– tparker
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Helium-3 is stable and has two protons and one neutron.
$endgroup$
– tparker
10 hours ago
add a comment
|
overkill is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
overkill is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
overkill is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
overkill is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506716%2fcan-there-be-an-atomic-nucleus-where-there-are-more-protons-than-neutrons%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
"As far as I know , number of protons is less that or equal to the number of neutrons in any atomic nuclei." - I don't understand how you came to this belief. The very first element in the periodic table forms atoms with one proton and no neutron...
$endgroup$
– ACuriousMind♦
11 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Did you check the periodic table? Some prior research is required.
$endgroup$
– my2cts
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
How about a neutron star? It isn't an atomic nucleus, but it is more neutrons than protons.
$endgroup$
– mmesser314
10 hours ago