When Conservative MPs lose the whip, do they retain the right to vote in leadership elections?How long can a vote of no confidence against the prime minister be delayed or avoided?If the opposition wins a No Confidence vote in the week of April 8, 2019, could they stop No Deal?Did any Conservative MPs indicate that they might vote against May?Have any of the “hard Brexit” Tories who voted against May's Withdrawal Agreement in late March stepped forward to be PM?What is the latest date a general election in the UK can prevent a no-deal BrexitThe actual purview of Her Majesty The Queen's prerogative?Why is the UK so keen to remove the “backstop” when their leadership seems to think that no border will be needed in Northern Ireland?According to UK government, Parliament cannot stop a no-deal Brexit: Could this also be used to push through the agreement agreed by Theresa May?What did Boris Johnson mean when he said “extra 34 billion going into the NHS”Could a British PM name the Opposition leader the next PM when they resign

Is there a "right" way to interpret a novel, if not, how do we make sure our novel is interpreted correctly?

Contour plot of a sequence of spheres with increasing radius

Examples where "thin + thin = nice and thick"

How to improvise or make pot grip / pot handle

intensity color with custom ray tracing

What happens when a file that is 100% paged in to the page cache gets modified by another process

Are professors obligated to accept supervisory role? If not, how does it work?

More than three domains hosted on the same IP address

I won a car in a poker game. How is that taxed in Canada?

Project Euler problem #112

Why do the Brexit opposition parties not want a new election?

The meaning of "offing" in "an agreement in the offing"

What exactly is Apple Cider

Poor management handling of recent sickness and how to approach my return?

Is Sanskrit really the mother of all languages?

Owner keeps cutting corners and poaching workers for his other company

Why are some hotels asking you to book through Booking.com instead of matching the price at the front desk?

Infinitely many primes

Is mountain bike good for long distances?

How to finish my PhD?

How to plot two curves with the same area under?

How strong is aircraft-grade spruce?

Electric shock from pedals and guitar. Jacks too long?

Features seen on the Space Shuttle's solid booster; what does "LOADED" mean exactly?



When Conservative MPs lose the whip, do they retain the right to vote in leadership elections?


How long can a vote of no confidence against the prime minister be delayed or avoided?If the opposition wins a No Confidence vote in the week of April 8, 2019, could they stop No Deal?Did any Conservative MPs indicate that they might vote against May?Have any of the “hard Brexit” Tories who voted against May's Withdrawal Agreement in late March stepped forward to be PM?What is the latest date a general election in the UK can prevent a no-deal BrexitThe actual purview of Her Majesty The Queen's prerogative?Why is the UK so keen to remove the “backstop” when their leadership seems to think that no border will be needed in Northern Ireland?According to UK government, Parliament cannot stop a no-deal Brexit: Could this also be used to push through the agreement agreed by Theresa May?What did Boris Johnson mean when he said “extra 34 billion going into the NHS”Could a British PM name the Opposition leader the next PM when they resign






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















Were 48 letters put into the 1922 Committee calling for a vote of no-confidence in Boris Johnson as PM, would those members who have lost the whip be allowed to vote?










share|improve this question
































    3















    Were 48 letters put into the 1922 Committee calling for a vote of no-confidence in Boris Johnson as PM, would those members who have lost the whip be allowed to vote?










    share|improve this question




























      3












      3








      3








      Were 48 letters put into the 1922 Committee calling for a vote of no-confidence in Boris Johnson as PM, would those members who have lost the whip be allowed to vote?










      share|improve this question
















      Were 48 letters put into the 1922 Committee calling for a vote of no-confidence in Boris Johnson as PM, would those members who have lost the whip be allowed to vote?







      united-kingdom parliament conservative-party






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago









      Martin Schröder

      1,6852 gold badges13 silver badges35 bronze badges




      1,6852 gold badges13 silver badges35 bronze badges










      asked 8 hours ago









      WS2WS2

      2,7375 gold badges17 silver badges32 bronze badges




      2,7375 gold badges17 silver badges32 bronze badges























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4
















          They would not be allowed to vote in the initial rounds of the election, as they are not members of the parliamentary party. Their membership has been suspended, so they cannot get the benefits of being members of the parliamentary party.



          They may be allowed to vote in the final round. Reading the rules of the Conservative party suggests that there are basically two ways to get kicked out of the national party: Joining another party and bringing the party into disrepute. A member who has the whip withdrawn has not brought the party into disrepute, and if they don't join another party, then remain members of the national party and of the local Conservative association. As such they would be sent a ballot paper for the final stage of the voting process.



          It is worth noting that the Conservative party has generally been willing to allow the 1922 committee to interpret and develop its own rules in response to events. The rules of the Conservative party are seen as a framework for decision making rather than immutable law.






          share|improve this answer

























          • So by withdrawing the whip from 21 members Johnson has protected himself, to some extent, against a vote of no confidence. It seems quite absurd that he has the sole right to withdraw the whip, while he holds office at the discretion of the parliamentary party.

            – WS2
            7 hours ago







          • 1





            Well, he just received the votes of a majority of the the parliamentary party and the national party. And by withdrawing the whip he has opened himself to a no confidence vote in parliament. At the moment his problem is holding the confidence of parliament, not holding the confidence of the parliamentary party.

            – James K
            6 hours ago











          • Quite. But based on reports in the media he is rapidly losing the support of many in the parliamentary party - ones who still hold the whip.

            – WS2
            6 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "475"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );














          draft saved

          draft discarded
















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44370%2fwhen-conservative-mps-lose-the-whip-do-they-retain-the-right-to-vote-in-leaders%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4
















          They would not be allowed to vote in the initial rounds of the election, as they are not members of the parliamentary party. Their membership has been suspended, so they cannot get the benefits of being members of the parliamentary party.



          They may be allowed to vote in the final round. Reading the rules of the Conservative party suggests that there are basically two ways to get kicked out of the national party: Joining another party and bringing the party into disrepute. A member who has the whip withdrawn has not brought the party into disrepute, and if they don't join another party, then remain members of the national party and of the local Conservative association. As such they would be sent a ballot paper for the final stage of the voting process.



          It is worth noting that the Conservative party has generally been willing to allow the 1922 committee to interpret and develop its own rules in response to events. The rules of the Conservative party are seen as a framework for decision making rather than immutable law.






          share|improve this answer

























          • So by withdrawing the whip from 21 members Johnson has protected himself, to some extent, against a vote of no confidence. It seems quite absurd that he has the sole right to withdraw the whip, while he holds office at the discretion of the parliamentary party.

            – WS2
            7 hours ago







          • 1





            Well, he just received the votes of a majority of the the parliamentary party and the national party. And by withdrawing the whip he has opened himself to a no confidence vote in parliament. At the moment his problem is holding the confidence of parliament, not holding the confidence of the parliamentary party.

            – James K
            6 hours ago











          • Quite. But based on reports in the media he is rapidly losing the support of many in the parliamentary party - ones who still hold the whip.

            – WS2
            6 hours ago















          4
















          They would not be allowed to vote in the initial rounds of the election, as they are not members of the parliamentary party. Their membership has been suspended, so they cannot get the benefits of being members of the parliamentary party.



          They may be allowed to vote in the final round. Reading the rules of the Conservative party suggests that there are basically two ways to get kicked out of the national party: Joining another party and bringing the party into disrepute. A member who has the whip withdrawn has not brought the party into disrepute, and if they don't join another party, then remain members of the national party and of the local Conservative association. As such they would be sent a ballot paper for the final stage of the voting process.



          It is worth noting that the Conservative party has generally been willing to allow the 1922 committee to interpret and develop its own rules in response to events. The rules of the Conservative party are seen as a framework for decision making rather than immutable law.






          share|improve this answer

























          • So by withdrawing the whip from 21 members Johnson has protected himself, to some extent, against a vote of no confidence. It seems quite absurd that he has the sole right to withdraw the whip, while he holds office at the discretion of the parliamentary party.

            – WS2
            7 hours ago







          • 1





            Well, he just received the votes of a majority of the the parliamentary party and the national party. And by withdrawing the whip he has opened himself to a no confidence vote in parliament. At the moment his problem is holding the confidence of parliament, not holding the confidence of the parliamentary party.

            – James K
            6 hours ago











          • Quite. But based on reports in the media he is rapidly losing the support of many in the parliamentary party - ones who still hold the whip.

            – WS2
            6 hours ago













          4














          4










          4









          They would not be allowed to vote in the initial rounds of the election, as they are not members of the parliamentary party. Their membership has been suspended, so they cannot get the benefits of being members of the parliamentary party.



          They may be allowed to vote in the final round. Reading the rules of the Conservative party suggests that there are basically two ways to get kicked out of the national party: Joining another party and bringing the party into disrepute. A member who has the whip withdrawn has not brought the party into disrepute, and if they don't join another party, then remain members of the national party and of the local Conservative association. As such they would be sent a ballot paper for the final stage of the voting process.



          It is worth noting that the Conservative party has generally been willing to allow the 1922 committee to interpret and develop its own rules in response to events. The rules of the Conservative party are seen as a framework for decision making rather than immutable law.






          share|improve this answer













          They would not be allowed to vote in the initial rounds of the election, as they are not members of the parliamentary party. Their membership has been suspended, so they cannot get the benefits of being members of the parliamentary party.



          They may be allowed to vote in the final round. Reading the rules of the Conservative party suggests that there are basically two ways to get kicked out of the national party: Joining another party and bringing the party into disrepute. A member who has the whip withdrawn has not brought the party into disrepute, and if they don't join another party, then remain members of the national party and of the local Conservative association. As such they would be sent a ballot paper for the final stage of the voting process.



          It is worth noting that the Conservative party has generally been willing to allow the 1922 committee to interpret and develop its own rules in response to events. The rules of the Conservative party are seen as a framework for decision making rather than immutable law.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          James KJames K

          43.4k8 gold badges122 silver badges185 bronze badges




          43.4k8 gold badges122 silver badges185 bronze badges















          • So by withdrawing the whip from 21 members Johnson has protected himself, to some extent, against a vote of no confidence. It seems quite absurd that he has the sole right to withdraw the whip, while he holds office at the discretion of the parliamentary party.

            – WS2
            7 hours ago







          • 1





            Well, he just received the votes of a majority of the the parliamentary party and the national party. And by withdrawing the whip he has opened himself to a no confidence vote in parliament. At the moment his problem is holding the confidence of parliament, not holding the confidence of the parliamentary party.

            – James K
            6 hours ago











          • Quite. But based on reports in the media he is rapidly losing the support of many in the parliamentary party - ones who still hold the whip.

            – WS2
            6 hours ago

















          • So by withdrawing the whip from 21 members Johnson has protected himself, to some extent, against a vote of no confidence. It seems quite absurd that he has the sole right to withdraw the whip, while he holds office at the discretion of the parliamentary party.

            – WS2
            7 hours ago







          • 1





            Well, he just received the votes of a majority of the the parliamentary party and the national party. And by withdrawing the whip he has opened himself to a no confidence vote in parliament. At the moment his problem is holding the confidence of parliament, not holding the confidence of the parliamentary party.

            – James K
            6 hours ago











          • Quite. But based on reports in the media he is rapidly losing the support of many in the parliamentary party - ones who still hold the whip.

            – WS2
            6 hours ago
















          So by withdrawing the whip from 21 members Johnson has protected himself, to some extent, against a vote of no confidence. It seems quite absurd that he has the sole right to withdraw the whip, while he holds office at the discretion of the parliamentary party.

          – WS2
          7 hours ago






          So by withdrawing the whip from 21 members Johnson has protected himself, to some extent, against a vote of no confidence. It seems quite absurd that he has the sole right to withdraw the whip, while he holds office at the discretion of the parliamentary party.

          – WS2
          7 hours ago





          1




          1





          Well, he just received the votes of a majority of the the parliamentary party and the national party. And by withdrawing the whip he has opened himself to a no confidence vote in parliament. At the moment his problem is holding the confidence of parliament, not holding the confidence of the parliamentary party.

          – James K
          6 hours ago





          Well, he just received the votes of a majority of the the parliamentary party and the national party. And by withdrawing the whip he has opened himself to a no confidence vote in parliament. At the moment his problem is holding the confidence of parliament, not holding the confidence of the parliamentary party.

          – James K
          6 hours ago













          Quite. But based on reports in the media he is rapidly losing the support of many in the parliamentary party - ones who still hold the whip.

          – WS2
          6 hours ago





          Quite. But based on reports in the media he is rapidly losing the support of many in the parliamentary party - ones who still hold the whip.

          – WS2
          6 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44370%2fwhen-conservative-mps-lose-the-whip-do-they-retain-the-right-to-vote-in-leaders%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480