Undefined Hamiltonian for this particular LagrangianAdding a total time derivative term to the LagrangianLagrangian to HamiltonianHamiltonian mechanics really useful for numerical integration? Lagrangian can become 1st-orderFinding geodesics: Lagrangian vs HamiltonianInconsistency in Lagrangian vs Hamiltonian formalism?Gauge invariance of the HamiltonianWhat is my state in the context of Hamiltonian mechanics?Can we write a Lagrangian for the classical system with $H=kqp$?Canonical transformations preserve Hamilton's equations. Which transformation preserve the Euler-Lagrange equations?Can all canonical transformations be generated using a generating function?

Why is a pressure canner needed when canning?

Global variables and information security

Never make public members virtual/abstract - really?

What drugs were used in England during the High Middle Ages?

What are some countries where you can be imprisoned for reading or owning a Bible?

Is a paralyzed creature limp or rigid?

How do I delete cookies from a specific site?

A magician's sleight of hand

Does POSIX guarantee the paths to any standard utilities?

Label "Alto en grasa saturada, sal, ..." should there also be Alta?

Are buttons really enough to bound validities by S4.2?

How do I make my fill-in-the-blank exercise more obvious?

If I have an accident, should I file a claim with my car insurance company?

If one can diff from Vim without the need to boot `vimdiff` then why is it a binary program?

How do I stop making people jump at home and at work?

Fantasy Military Arms and Armor: the Dwarven Grand Armory

Round away from zero

Why did Boris Johnson call for new elections?

Was Rosie the Riveter sourced from a Michelangelo painting?

What quests do you need to stop at before you make an enemy of a faction for each faction?

Would you recommend a keyboard for beginners with or without lights in keys for learning?

How can I implement regular expressions on an embedded device?

Why does the seven segment display have decimal point at the right?

split a six digits number column into separated columns with one digit



Undefined Hamiltonian for this particular Lagrangian


Adding a total time derivative term to the LagrangianLagrangian to HamiltonianHamiltonian mechanics really useful for numerical integration? Lagrangian can become 1st-orderFinding geodesics: Lagrangian vs HamiltonianInconsistency in Lagrangian vs Hamiltonian formalism?Gauge invariance of the HamiltonianWhat is my state in the context of Hamiltonian mechanics?Can we write a Lagrangian for the classical system with $H=kqp$?Canonical transformations preserve Hamilton's equations. Which transformation preserve the Euler-Lagrange equations?Can all canonical transformations be generated using a generating function?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


So, this a question from a Phd qualifying examination. Given the following Lagrangan $$L=frac12dotqtextsin^2q,$$ what is the Hamiltonian for this system? So, finding the canonical momentum $p$ and then using $H=pdotq -L$, I find that it is identically zero. Now, the answer 'Zero' was a choice in the choices of answers given but the correct answer is that the Hamiltonian is undefined. I'm not sure why this should be the answer, though this is a pretty weird dynamical system. The Euler Lagrange equations just give an identity and the Hamiltonian equations also seem rather off. The Hamiltonian equations would are $$dotp=dotq=0. $$
I'm hoping someone shed some light on this, it seems that any random Lagrangian doesn't constitute a dynamical system, so what I should I be looking for?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I think it is also important to note that the fact the EL equations are always satisfied means that any trajectory you pick is a valid solution. In particular two systems with identical initial conditions can have radically different trajectories.
    $endgroup$
    – S V
    8 hours ago

















2












$begingroup$


So, this a question from a Phd qualifying examination. Given the following Lagrangan $$L=frac12dotqtextsin^2q,$$ what is the Hamiltonian for this system? So, finding the canonical momentum $p$ and then using $H=pdotq -L$, I find that it is identically zero. Now, the answer 'Zero' was a choice in the choices of answers given but the correct answer is that the Hamiltonian is undefined. I'm not sure why this should be the answer, though this is a pretty weird dynamical system. The Euler Lagrange equations just give an identity and the Hamiltonian equations also seem rather off. The Hamiltonian equations would are $$dotp=dotq=0. $$
I'm hoping someone shed some light on this, it seems that any random Lagrangian doesn't constitute a dynamical system, so what I should I be looking for?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I think it is also important to note that the fact the EL equations are always satisfied means that any trajectory you pick is a valid solution. In particular two systems with identical initial conditions can have radically different trajectories.
    $endgroup$
    – S V
    8 hours ago













2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


So, this a question from a Phd qualifying examination. Given the following Lagrangan $$L=frac12dotqtextsin^2q,$$ what is the Hamiltonian for this system? So, finding the canonical momentum $p$ and then using $H=pdotq -L$, I find that it is identically zero. Now, the answer 'Zero' was a choice in the choices of answers given but the correct answer is that the Hamiltonian is undefined. I'm not sure why this should be the answer, though this is a pretty weird dynamical system. The Euler Lagrange equations just give an identity and the Hamiltonian equations also seem rather off. The Hamiltonian equations would are $$dotp=dotq=0. $$
I'm hoping someone shed some light on this, it seems that any random Lagrangian doesn't constitute a dynamical system, so what I should I be looking for?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




So, this a question from a Phd qualifying examination. Given the following Lagrangan $$L=frac12dotqtextsin^2q,$$ what is the Hamiltonian for this system? So, finding the canonical momentum $p$ and then using $H=pdotq -L$, I find that it is identically zero. Now, the answer 'Zero' was a choice in the choices of answers given but the correct answer is that the Hamiltonian is undefined. I'm not sure why this should be the answer, though this is a pretty weird dynamical system. The Euler Lagrange equations just give an identity and the Hamiltonian equations also seem rather off. The Hamiltonian equations would are $$dotp=dotq=0. $$
I'm hoping someone shed some light on this, it seems that any random Lagrangian doesn't constitute a dynamical system, so what I should I be looking for?







homework-and-exercises classical-mechanics lagrangian-formalism hamiltonian-formalism






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









Qmechanic

113k13 gold badges223 silver badges1341 bronze badges




113k13 gold badges223 silver badges1341 bronze badges










asked 8 hours ago









Soumil MaulickSoumil Maulick

938 bronze badges




938 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    I think it is also important to note that the fact the EL equations are always satisfied means that any trajectory you pick is a valid solution. In particular two systems with identical initial conditions can have radically different trajectories.
    $endgroup$
    – S V
    8 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    I think it is also important to note that the fact the EL equations are always satisfied means that any trajectory you pick is a valid solution. In particular two systems with identical initial conditions can have radically different trajectories.
    $endgroup$
    – S V
    8 hours ago















$begingroup$
I think it is also important to note that the fact the EL equations are always satisfied means that any trajectory you pick is a valid solution. In particular two systems with identical initial conditions can have radically different trajectories.
$endgroup$
– S V
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
I think it is also important to note that the fact the EL equations are always satisfied means that any trajectory you pick is a valid solution. In particular two systems with identical initial conditions can have radically different trajectories.
$endgroup$
– S V
8 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6














$begingroup$

The reason the Hamiltonian is undefined is that converting a Lagrangian to a Hamiltonian requires:



  • Finding $p$

  • Writing $H=pdot q-L$

  • Expressing $H$ in terms of $p$ and $q$, eliminating all dependence on $dot q$.

For the third step to be possible, you need to be able to define a coordinate transformation between the $(q,dot q)$ coordinate system and the $(q,p)$ coordinate system. This requires that $(q,p)$ is a good coordinate system, in that a state of the system can be uniquely represented by a pair of $(q,p)$ coordinates. In turn, this means that the transformation $(q,dot q)rightarrow (q,p)$ must have nonzero Jacobian.



However, it's easy to see this is not the case. We know that $(q,p)=(q,frac12sin^2 q)$. Thus, the Jacobian is



$$
J=left|beginsmallmatrix1 & 0\sin(q)cos(q) & 0endsmallmatrixright| = 0
$$



That means we CAN'T write $p$ as a function of $q,dot q$, and there can't be a Hamiltonian $H(p,q)$ that is a function of only the coordinates $(p,q)$ because the coordinates $(p,q)$ don't specify the state of the system.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$






















    6














    $begingroup$

    1. OP's Lagrangian $$L=fracddtleft(fracq4-frac18sin(2q)right)tag1$$ is a total time derivative, so the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equation is a triviality $0=0$, , cf. e.g. this Phys.SE post, and hence not suitable to determine physical trajectories. In other words, the Lagrangian (and Hamiltonian) formulations are ill-defined.


    2. The Hamiltonian is defined as the Legendre transformation of the Lagrangian, and hence formally defined as
      $$ H(q,p)~:=~sup_vinmathbbR(vp-L(q,v))~=~sup_vinmathbbRvleft(p-frac12sin^2(q)right)~=~left{beginarraylinftytext if p~neq~frac12sin^2(q),\ 0text otherwise. endarrayright. tag2$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "151"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f500218%2fundefined-hamiltonian-for-this-particular-lagrangian%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      6














      $begingroup$

      The reason the Hamiltonian is undefined is that converting a Lagrangian to a Hamiltonian requires:



      • Finding $p$

      • Writing $H=pdot q-L$

      • Expressing $H$ in terms of $p$ and $q$, eliminating all dependence on $dot q$.

      For the third step to be possible, you need to be able to define a coordinate transformation between the $(q,dot q)$ coordinate system and the $(q,p)$ coordinate system. This requires that $(q,p)$ is a good coordinate system, in that a state of the system can be uniquely represented by a pair of $(q,p)$ coordinates. In turn, this means that the transformation $(q,dot q)rightarrow (q,p)$ must have nonzero Jacobian.



      However, it's easy to see this is not the case. We know that $(q,p)=(q,frac12sin^2 q)$. Thus, the Jacobian is



      $$
      J=left|beginsmallmatrix1 & 0\sin(q)cos(q) & 0endsmallmatrixright| = 0
      $$



      That means we CAN'T write $p$ as a function of $q,dot q$, and there can't be a Hamiltonian $H(p,q)$ that is a function of only the coordinates $(p,q)$ because the coordinates $(p,q)$ don't specify the state of the system.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



















        6














        $begingroup$

        The reason the Hamiltonian is undefined is that converting a Lagrangian to a Hamiltonian requires:



        • Finding $p$

        • Writing $H=pdot q-L$

        • Expressing $H$ in terms of $p$ and $q$, eliminating all dependence on $dot q$.

        For the third step to be possible, you need to be able to define a coordinate transformation between the $(q,dot q)$ coordinate system and the $(q,p)$ coordinate system. This requires that $(q,p)$ is a good coordinate system, in that a state of the system can be uniquely represented by a pair of $(q,p)$ coordinates. In turn, this means that the transformation $(q,dot q)rightarrow (q,p)$ must have nonzero Jacobian.



        However, it's easy to see this is not the case. We know that $(q,p)=(q,frac12sin^2 q)$. Thus, the Jacobian is



        $$
        J=left|beginsmallmatrix1 & 0\sin(q)cos(q) & 0endsmallmatrixright| = 0
        $$



        That means we CAN'T write $p$ as a function of $q,dot q$, and there can't be a Hamiltonian $H(p,q)$ that is a function of only the coordinates $(p,q)$ because the coordinates $(p,q)$ don't specify the state of the system.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          6














          6










          6







          $begingroup$

          The reason the Hamiltonian is undefined is that converting a Lagrangian to a Hamiltonian requires:



          • Finding $p$

          • Writing $H=pdot q-L$

          • Expressing $H$ in terms of $p$ and $q$, eliminating all dependence on $dot q$.

          For the third step to be possible, you need to be able to define a coordinate transformation between the $(q,dot q)$ coordinate system and the $(q,p)$ coordinate system. This requires that $(q,p)$ is a good coordinate system, in that a state of the system can be uniquely represented by a pair of $(q,p)$ coordinates. In turn, this means that the transformation $(q,dot q)rightarrow (q,p)$ must have nonzero Jacobian.



          However, it's easy to see this is not the case. We know that $(q,p)=(q,frac12sin^2 q)$. Thus, the Jacobian is



          $$
          J=left|beginsmallmatrix1 & 0\sin(q)cos(q) & 0endsmallmatrixright| = 0
          $$



          That means we CAN'T write $p$ as a function of $q,dot q$, and there can't be a Hamiltonian $H(p,q)$ that is a function of only the coordinates $(p,q)$ because the coordinates $(p,q)$ don't specify the state of the system.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The reason the Hamiltonian is undefined is that converting a Lagrangian to a Hamiltonian requires:



          • Finding $p$

          • Writing $H=pdot q-L$

          • Expressing $H$ in terms of $p$ and $q$, eliminating all dependence on $dot q$.

          For the third step to be possible, you need to be able to define a coordinate transformation between the $(q,dot q)$ coordinate system and the $(q,p)$ coordinate system. This requires that $(q,p)$ is a good coordinate system, in that a state of the system can be uniquely represented by a pair of $(q,p)$ coordinates. In turn, this means that the transformation $(q,dot q)rightarrow (q,p)$ must have nonzero Jacobian.



          However, it's easy to see this is not the case. We know that $(q,p)=(q,frac12sin^2 q)$. Thus, the Jacobian is



          $$
          J=left|beginsmallmatrix1 & 0\sin(q)cos(q) & 0endsmallmatrixright| = 0
          $$



          That means we CAN'T write $p$ as a function of $q,dot q$, and there can't be a Hamiltonian $H(p,q)$ that is a function of only the coordinates $(p,q)$ because the coordinates $(p,q)$ don't specify the state of the system.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          Jahan ClaesJahan Claes

          4,88012 silver badges34 bronze badges




          4,88012 silver badges34 bronze badges


























              6














              $begingroup$

              1. OP's Lagrangian $$L=fracddtleft(fracq4-frac18sin(2q)right)tag1$$ is a total time derivative, so the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equation is a triviality $0=0$, , cf. e.g. this Phys.SE post, and hence not suitable to determine physical trajectories. In other words, the Lagrangian (and Hamiltonian) formulations are ill-defined.


              2. The Hamiltonian is defined as the Legendre transformation of the Lagrangian, and hence formally defined as
                $$ H(q,p)~:=~sup_vinmathbbR(vp-L(q,v))~=~sup_vinmathbbRvleft(p-frac12sin^2(q)right)~=~left{beginarraylinftytext if p~neq~frac12sin^2(q),\ 0text otherwise. endarrayright. tag2$$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



















                6














                $begingroup$

                1. OP's Lagrangian $$L=fracddtleft(fracq4-frac18sin(2q)right)tag1$$ is a total time derivative, so the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equation is a triviality $0=0$, , cf. e.g. this Phys.SE post, and hence not suitable to determine physical trajectories. In other words, the Lagrangian (and Hamiltonian) formulations are ill-defined.


                2. The Hamiltonian is defined as the Legendre transformation of the Lagrangian, and hence formally defined as
                  $$ H(q,p)~:=~sup_vinmathbbR(vp-L(q,v))~=~sup_vinmathbbRvleft(p-frac12sin^2(q)right)~=~left{beginarraylinftytext if p~neq~frac12sin^2(q),\ 0text otherwise. endarrayright. tag2$$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  6














                  6










                  6







                  $begingroup$

                  1. OP's Lagrangian $$L=fracddtleft(fracq4-frac18sin(2q)right)tag1$$ is a total time derivative, so the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equation is a triviality $0=0$, , cf. e.g. this Phys.SE post, and hence not suitable to determine physical trajectories. In other words, the Lagrangian (and Hamiltonian) formulations are ill-defined.


                  2. The Hamiltonian is defined as the Legendre transformation of the Lagrangian, and hence formally defined as
                    $$ H(q,p)~:=~sup_vinmathbbR(vp-L(q,v))~=~sup_vinmathbbRvleft(p-frac12sin^2(q)right)~=~left{beginarraylinftytext if p~neq~frac12sin^2(q),\ 0text otherwise. endarrayright. tag2$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  1. OP's Lagrangian $$L=fracddtleft(fracq4-frac18sin(2q)right)tag1$$ is a total time derivative, so the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equation is a triviality $0=0$, , cf. e.g. this Phys.SE post, and hence not suitable to determine physical trajectories. In other words, the Lagrangian (and Hamiltonian) formulations are ill-defined.


                  2. The Hamiltonian is defined as the Legendre transformation of the Lagrangian, and hence formally defined as
                    $$ H(q,p)~:=~sup_vinmathbbR(vp-L(q,v))~=~sup_vinmathbbRvleft(p-frac12sin^2(q)right)~=~left{beginarraylinftytext if p~neq~frac12sin^2(q),\ 0text otherwise. endarrayright. tag2$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 7 hours ago

























                  answered 8 hours ago









                  QmechanicQmechanic

                  113k13 gold badges223 silver badges1341 bronze badges




                  113k13 gold badges223 silver badges1341 bronze badges






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f500218%2fundefined-hamiltonian-for-this-particular-lagrangian%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單