Piecewise convexity and global convexityDoes local convexity imply global convexity?Convexity of Exponential Composite FunctionFunction on convex set is convex if all rays are convexA lower semi-continuous convex function being not continuous on its domainInequality of convexity with the middle point onlyProving Convexity of Multivariate Function using Conditional Univariate Convexitycomposition of functions and concavityContinuity + strict convexity on interior implies strict convexity everywhere?
Xdebug not working over Drush
Do beef farmed pastures net remove carbon emissions?
Why won't the Republicans use a superdelegate system like the DNC in their nomination process?
Why aren't rockets built with truss structures inside their fuel & oxidizer tanks to increase structural strength?
Why not demand President's/candidate's financial records instead of tax returns?
Does an Irish VISA WARNING count as "refused entry at the border of any country other than the UK?"
Is there a fallacy about "appeal to 'big words'"?
Why is the result of ('b'+'a'+ + 'a' + 'a').toLowerCase() 'banana'?
Boss wants me to ignore a software API license
What is the most difficult concept to grasp in Calculus 1?
How do I call a 6-digit Australian phone number with a US-based mobile phone?
Would the USA be eligible to join the European Union?
What kind of liquid can be seen 'leaking' from the upper surface of the wing of a Boeing 737-800?
Why does cat'ing a file via ssh result in control characters?
Causal Diagrams using Wolfram?
Why does the cable resistance jump from a low value to high value at a particular frequency?
Identifying My Main Water Shutoff Valve / Setup
Did Pope Urban II issue the papal bull "terra nullius" in 1095?
Does fossil fuels use since 1990 account for half of all the fossil fuels used in history?
How do I ask for 2-3 days per week remote work in a job interview?
Lípínguapua dopo Pêpê
If a person claims to know anything could it be disproven by saying 'prove that we are not in a simulation'?
Why is there a dummy union member in some implemetations of std::optional?
Why is the second S silent in "Sens dessus dessous"?
Piecewise convexity and global convexity
Does local convexity imply global convexity?Convexity of Exponential Composite FunctionFunction on convex set is convex if all rays are convexA lower semi-continuous convex function being not continuous on its domainInequality of convexity with the middle point onlyProving Convexity of Multivariate Function using Conditional Univariate Convexitycomposition of functions and concavityContinuity + strict convexity on interior implies strict convexity everywhere?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Let $f:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ be continuous on $left[0,1right]$.
Consider $zinleft(0,1right)$ and suppose that $f$ is differentiable
and convex on $left[0,zright]$ and $left[z,1right]$. If $f'$
(i.e., $fracdfdx$) is continuous at $z$, then $f$ is convex
on $left[0,1right]$. - Is this proposition true? While I could not create a counter-example, I am finding it difficult to generate a clean proof as well.
real-analysis convex-analysis
New contributor
Tapas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ be continuous on $left[0,1right]$.
Consider $zinleft(0,1right)$ and suppose that $f$ is differentiable
and convex on $left[0,zright]$ and $left[z,1right]$. If $f'$
(i.e., $fracdfdx$) is continuous at $z$, then $f$ is convex
on $left[0,1right]$. - Is this proposition true? While I could not create a counter-example, I am finding it difficult to generate a clean proof as well.
real-analysis convex-analysis
New contributor
Tapas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
OK, I got your answers, and thank all of you for that. However, I would like to add something more to this question. To what extent, can I relax continuity of $f'$, and still have global convexity? Following your lines of proof, it seems to me that as long as the left-side derivative ($f'_-$) at $z$, which is well defined, is less than the right-side derivative ($f'_+$) at $z$, which is well defined as well, global convexity prevails. I do not need continuity of $f'$ precisely - Is this correct?
$endgroup$
– Tapas
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ be continuous on $left[0,1right]$.
Consider $zinleft(0,1right)$ and suppose that $f$ is differentiable
and convex on $left[0,zright]$ and $left[z,1right]$. If $f'$
(i.e., $fracdfdx$) is continuous at $z$, then $f$ is convex
on $left[0,1right]$. - Is this proposition true? While I could not create a counter-example, I am finding it difficult to generate a clean proof as well.
real-analysis convex-analysis
New contributor
Tapas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Let $f:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ be continuous on $left[0,1right]$.
Consider $zinleft(0,1right)$ and suppose that $f$ is differentiable
and convex on $left[0,zright]$ and $left[z,1right]$. If $f'$
(i.e., $fracdfdx$) is continuous at $z$, then $f$ is convex
on $left[0,1right]$. - Is this proposition true? While I could not create a counter-example, I am finding it difficult to generate a clean proof as well.
real-analysis convex-analysis
real-analysis convex-analysis
New contributor
Tapas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Tapas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 8 hours ago
Stefan Egger
5311 silver badge10 bronze badges
5311 silver badge10 bronze badges
New contributor
Tapas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
TapasTapas
284 bronze badges
284 bronze badges
New contributor
Tapas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Tapas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
OK, I got your answers, and thank all of you for that. However, I would like to add something more to this question. To what extent, can I relax continuity of $f'$, and still have global convexity? Following your lines of proof, it seems to me that as long as the left-side derivative ($f'_-$) at $z$, which is well defined, is less than the right-side derivative ($f'_+$) at $z$, which is well defined as well, global convexity prevails. I do not need continuity of $f'$ precisely - Is this correct?
$endgroup$
– Tapas
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
OK, I got your answers, and thank all of you for that. However, I would like to add something more to this question. To what extent, can I relax continuity of $f'$, and still have global convexity? Following your lines of proof, it seems to me that as long as the left-side derivative ($f'_-$) at $z$, which is well defined, is less than the right-side derivative ($f'_+$) at $z$, which is well defined as well, global convexity prevails. I do not need continuity of $f'$ precisely - Is this correct?
$endgroup$
– Tapas
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
OK, I got your answers, and thank all of you for that. However, I would like to add something more to this question. To what extent, can I relax continuity of $f'$, and still have global convexity? Following your lines of proof, it seems to me that as long as the left-side derivative ($f'_-$) at $z$, which is well defined, is less than the right-side derivative ($f'_+$) at $z$, which is well defined as well, global convexity prevails. I do not need continuity of $f'$ precisely - Is this correct?
$endgroup$
– Tapas
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
OK, I got your answers, and thank all of you for that. However, I would like to add something more to this question. To what extent, can I relax continuity of $f'$, and still have global convexity? Following your lines of proof, it seems to me that as long as the left-side derivative ($f'_-$) at $z$, which is well defined, is less than the right-side derivative ($f'_+$) at $z$, which is well defined as well, global convexity prevails. I do not need continuity of $f'$ precisely - Is this correct?
$endgroup$
– Tapas
8 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A differentiable function $f$ is convex on an interval $(a,b)$ if and only if its derivative $f'$ is increasing.
Therefore, your assumptions imply that $f'$ is increasing on $(0,z)$ and on $(z,1)$. Now your assumption that $f'$ is continuous immediately gives you that $f'$ is increasing on $(0,1)$ and therefore convex.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. If I relax continuity of $f'$ at $z$, and just assume that the left-side derivative of $f$ at $z$ is less than the right-side derivative of $f$ at $z$, global convexity will still hold - is it right? In fact, I was wondering that is an "if and only if" condition to maintain global convexity.
$endgroup$
– Tapas
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes, you are right it generalizes in the way you suggest it. But note that this does not follow from the proof I gave because the criterion I used needs that $f$ is differentiable in the whole interval. If you weaken this assumption you will have to proof it in a different way. I think it will boil down to using the definition of convexity and show it explicitly like one would show the theorem I used in my answer.
$endgroup$
– Stefan Egger
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A differentiable function is convex in an interval $I$ if and only if $f'$ is increasing in $I$. Now we have that
$$f'(x)leq f'(z)leq f'(y)$$
for any $0leq x<z<yleq 1$. Can you take it from here and show that the proposition is true?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes it's true. $f$ is convex iff $f'$ is monotonically non-decreasing, but it works on $[0, z)$ and $(z, 1]$. But $f'$ is continuous at $z$ so it can't be less than 0 otherwise there would be a neighborhood where it is negative and thus not convex.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Tapas is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3323197%2fpiecewise-convexity-and-global-convexity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A differentiable function $f$ is convex on an interval $(a,b)$ if and only if its derivative $f'$ is increasing.
Therefore, your assumptions imply that $f'$ is increasing on $(0,z)$ and on $(z,1)$. Now your assumption that $f'$ is continuous immediately gives you that $f'$ is increasing on $(0,1)$ and therefore convex.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. If I relax continuity of $f'$ at $z$, and just assume that the left-side derivative of $f$ at $z$ is less than the right-side derivative of $f$ at $z$, global convexity will still hold - is it right? In fact, I was wondering that is an "if and only if" condition to maintain global convexity.
$endgroup$
– Tapas
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes, you are right it generalizes in the way you suggest it. But note that this does not follow from the proof I gave because the criterion I used needs that $f$ is differentiable in the whole interval. If you weaken this assumption you will have to proof it in a different way. I think it will boil down to using the definition of convexity and show it explicitly like one would show the theorem I used in my answer.
$endgroup$
– Stefan Egger
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A differentiable function $f$ is convex on an interval $(a,b)$ if and only if its derivative $f'$ is increasing.
Therefore, your assumptions imply that $f'$ is increasing on $(0,z)$ and on $(z,1)$. Now your assumption that $f'$ is continuous immediately gives you that $f'$ is increasing on $(0,1)$ and therefore convex.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. If I relax continuity of $f'$ at $z$, and just assume that the left-side derivative of $f$ at $z$ is less than the right-side derivative of $f$ at $z$, global convexity will still hold - is it right? In fact, I was wondering that is an "if and only if" condition to maintain global convexity.
$endgroup$
– Tapas
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes, you are right it generalizes in the way you suggest it. But note that this does not follow from the proof I gave because the criterion I used needs that $f$ is differentiable in the whole interval. If you weaken this assumption you will have to proof it in a different way. I think it will boil down to using the definition of convexity and show it explicitly like one would show the theorem I used in my answer.
$endgroup$
– Stefan Egger
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A differentiable function $f$ is convex on an interval $(a,b)$ if and only if its derivative $f'$ is increasing.
Therefore, your assumptions imply that $f'$ is increasing on $(0,z)$ and on $(z,1)$. Now your assumption that $f'$ is continuous immediately gives you that $f'$ is increasing on $(0,1)$ and therefore convex.
$endgroup$
A differentiable function $f$ is convex on an interval $(a,b)$ if and only if its derivative $f'$ is increasing.
Therefore, your assumptions imply that $f'$ is increasing on $(0,z)$ and on $(z,1)$. Now your assumption that $f'$ is continuous immediately gives you that $f'$ is increasing on $(0,1)$ and therefore convex.
answered 8 hours ago
Stefan EggerStefan Egger
5311 silver badge10 bronze badges
5311 silver badge10 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. If I relax continuity of $f'$ at $z$, and just assume that the left-side derivative of $f$ at $z$ is less than the right-side derivative of $f$ at $z$, global convexity will still hold - is it right? In fact, I was wondering that is an "if and only if" condition to maintain global convexity.
$endgroup$
– Tapas
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes, you are right it generalizes in the way you suggest it. But note that this does not follow from the proof I gave because the criterion I used needs that $f$ is differentiable in the whole interval. If you weaken this assumption you will have to proof it in a different way. I think it will boil down to using the definition of convexity and show it explicitly like one would show the theorem I used in my answer.
$endgroup$
– Stefan Egger
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. If I relax continuity of $f'$ at $z$, and just assume that the left-side derivative of $f$ at $z$ is less than the right-side derivative of $f$ at $z$, global convexity will still hold - is it right? In fact, I was wondering that is an "if and only if" condition to maintain global convexity.
$endgroup$
– Tapas
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes, you are right it generalizes in the way you suggest it. But note that this does not follow from the proof I gave because the criterion I used needs that $f$ is differentiable in the whole interval. If you weaken this assumption you will have to proof it in a different way. I think it will boil down to using the definition of convexity and show it explicitly like one would show the theorem I used in my answer.
$endgroup$
– Stefan Egger
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. If I relax continuity of $f'$ at $z$, and just assume that the left-side derivative of $f$ at $z$ is less than the right-side derivative of $f$ at $z$, global convexity will still hold - is it right? In fact, I was wondering that is an "if and only if" condition to maintain global convexity.
$endgroup$
– Tapas
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. If I relax continuity of $f'$ at $z$, and just assume that the left-side derivative of $f$ at $z$ is less than the right-side derivative of $f$ at $z$, global convexity will still hold - is it right? In fact, I was wondering that is an "if and only if" condition to maintain global convexity.
$endgroup$
– Tapas
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes, you are right it generalizes in the way you suggest it. But note that this does not follow from the proof I gave because the criterion I used needs that $f$ is differentiable in the whole interval. If you weaken this assumption you will have to proof it in a different way. I think it will boil down to using the definition of convexity and show it explicitly like one would show the theorem I used in my answer.
$endgroup$
– Stefan Egger
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, you are right it generalizes in the way you suggest it. But note that this does not follow from the proof I gave because the criterion I used needs that $f$ is differentiable in the whole interval. If you weaken this assumption you will have to proof it in a different way. I think it will boil down to using the definition of convexity and show it explicitly like one would show the theorem I used in my answer.
$endgroup$
– Stefan Egger
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A differentiable function is convex in an interval $I$ if and only if $f'$ is increasing in $I$. Now we have that
$$f'(x)leq f'(z)leq f'(y)$$
for any $0leq x<z<yleq 1$. Can you take it from here and show that the proposition is true?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A differentiable function is convex in an interval $I$ if and only if $f'$ is increasing in $I$. Now we have that
$$f'(x)leq f'(z)leq f'(y)$$
for any $0leq x<z<yleq 1$. Can you take it from here and show that the proposition is true?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A differentiable function is convex in an interval $I$ if and only if $f'$ is increasing in $I$. Now we have that
$$f'(x)leq f'(z)leq f'(y)$$
for any $0leq x<z<yleq 1$. Can you take it from here and show that the proposition is true?
$endgroup$
A differentiable function is convex in an interval $I$ if and only if $f'$ is increasing in $I$. Now we have that
$$f'(x)leq f'(z)leq f'(y)$$
for any $0leq x<z<yleq 1$. Can you take it from here and show that the proposition is true?
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
Robert ZRobert Z
109k10 gold badges77 silver badges152 bronze badges
109k10 gold badges77 silver badges152 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes it's true. $f$ is convex iff $f'$ is monotonically non-decreasing, but it works on $[0, z)$ and $(z, 1]$. But $f'$ is continuous at $z$ so it can't be less than 0 otherwise there would be a neighborhood where it is negative and thus not convex.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes it's true. $f$ is convex iff $f'$ is monotonically non-decreasing, but it works on $[0, z)$ and $(z, 1]$. But $f'$ is continuous at $z$ so it can't be less than 0 otherwise there would be a neighborhood where it is negative and thus not convex.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes it's true. $f$ is convex iff $f'$ is monotonically non-decreasing, but it works on $[0, z)$ and $(z, 1]$. But $f'$ is continuous at $z$ so it can't be less than 0 otherwise there would be a neighborhood where it is negative and thus not convex.
$endgroup$
Yes it's true. $f$ is convex iff $f'$ is monotonically non-decreasing, but it works on $[0, z)$ and $(z, 1]$. But $f'$ is continuous at $z$ so it can't be less than 0 otherwise there would be a neighborhood where it is negative and thus not convex.
answered 8 hours ago
aeruponsaerupons
412 bronze badges
412 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Tapas is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Tapas is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Tapas is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Tapas is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3323197%2fpiecewise-convexity-and-global-convexity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
OK, I got your answers, and thank all of you for that. However, I would like to add something more to this question. To what extent, can I relax continuity of $f'$, and still have global convexity? Following your lines of proof, it seems to me that as long as the left-side derivative ($f'_-$) at $z$, which is well defined, is less than the right-side derivative ($f'_+$) at $z$, which is well defined as well, global convexity prevails. I do not need continuity of $f'$ precisely - Is this correct?
$endgroup$
– Tapas
8 hours ago