A+ rating still unsecure by chrome's opinionWhat determines the combination of ciphers available on an SSL server?Discrepancy in SSL Ciphers between Apache 2.2 and OpenSSL 1.0.1How to mitigate POODLE but keep SSLv3 support for old clientsnginx poodle fix configurationThe site is using outdated security settings that may prevent future versions of Chrome from being able to safely access it - even with SHA2New SSL, Safari can't open the page b/c server unexpectedly dropped the connection (subdomain)Unable to disable SSLv3 in Apache for POODLEApache SSL FS disable SHA1nginx fails to send HSTS headers despite being configured to do so
Why aren't rainbows blurred-out into nothing after they are produced?
Does fossil fuels use since 1990 account for half of all the fossil fuels used in history?
If a person claims to know anything could it be disproven by saying 'prove that we are not in a simulation'?
How can I communicate my issues with a potential date's pushy behavior?
Should I leave building the database for the end?
Are there examples in Tanach of 3 or more parties having an ongoing conversation?
How would you translate this? バタコチーズライス
"Mouth-breathing" as slang for stupidity
What is a "soap"?
How can I find files in directories listed in a file?
(A room / an office) where an artist works
Is this n-speak?
How do some PhD students get 10+ papers? Is that what I need for landing good faculty position?
Global BGP Routing only by only importing supernet prefixes
When was "Fredo" an insult to Italian-Americans?
Word for an event that will likely never happen again
What are the odds of rolling specific ability score totals in D&D?
Installing Windows to flash UEFI/ BIOS, then reinstalling Ubuntu
Why is there a large performance impact when looping over an array with 240 or more elements?
How can I shoot a bow using strength instead of dexterity?
Weird resistor with dots around it
Causal Diagrams using Wolfram?
How was the murder committed?
A+ rating still unsecure by chrome's opinion
A+ rating still unsecure by chrome's opinion
What determines the combination of ciphers available on an SSL server?Discrepancy in SSL Ciphers between Apache 2.2 and OpenSSL 1.0.1How to mitigate POODLE but keep SSLv3 support for old clientsnginx poodle fix configurationThe site is using outdated security settings that may prevent future versions of Chrome from being able to safely access it - even with SHA2New SSL, Safari can't open the page b/c server unexpectedly dropped the connection (subdomain)Unable to disable SSLv3 in Apache for POODLEApache SSL FS disable SHA1nginx fails to send HSTS headers despite being configured to do so
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I am provisioning my server on Digital Ocean and although i am getting an A+ rating from ssllabs
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=zandu.biz
but when i connect to my size https://www.zandu.biz or https://zandu.biz
i get a unsecure notice inside chrome.
Any advice on how to solve this?
ssl apache-2.4 lets-encrypt
New contributor
add a comment |
I am provisioning my server on Digital Ocean and although i am getting an A+ rating from ssllabs
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=zandu.biz
but when i connect to my size https://www.zandu.biz or https://zandu.biz
i get a unsecure notice inside chrome.
Any advice on how to solve this?
ssl apache-2.4 lets-encrypt
New contributor
add a comment |
I am provisioning my server on Digital Ocean and although i am getting an A+ rating from ssllabs
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=zandu.biz
but when i connect to my size https://www.zandu.biz or https://zandu.biz
i get a unsecure notice inside chrome.
Any advice on how to solve this?
ssl apache-2.4 lets-encrypt
New contributor
I am provisioning my server on Digital Ocean and although i am getting an A+ rating from ssllabs
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=zandu.biz
but when i connect to my size https://www.zandu.biz or https://zandu.biz
i get a unsecure notice inside chrome.
Any advice on how to solve this?
ssl apache-2.4 lets-encrypt
ssl apache-2.4 lets-encrypt
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 9 hours ago
The ArchitectThe Architect
83 bronze badges
83 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This server could not prove that it is www.zandu.biz; its security
certificate is from zandu.biz. This may be caused by a
misconfiguration or an attacker intercepting your connection.
The common name in your site's certificate is zandu.biz, which is not valid for a different name (www.zandu.biz). Moreover, you have a redirect from zandu.biz to www.zandu.biz, so if you use the name the certificate is valid for it redirects to the name that it isn't.
What you need is to get a certificate with both names.
New contributor
or Vetter a wildcard cert i. e. from Letsencrypt
– djdomi
8 hours ago
Wildcard certificates can be more convenient or necessary if the names you intend to use aren't actually known ahead of time. But they also increase your exposure if the associated private key is compromised because then the attacker can forge any name in your domain rather than only the ones that server was actually using.
– zrm
5 hours ago
Thank you @zrm. This was very helpful. I went from unsecure to not secure for some reason. It's a set in the right direction. Does this have to do with the fact that its not signed from a CA, just let's encrypt?
– The Architect
4 hours ago
Let's Encrypt is a CA. When they first started out they were cross-signed by IdenTrust but that ends in 2020 because their own root certificate is now widely trusted. None of that has anything to do with your problem, which would have been the same either way.
– zrm
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
The Architect is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f979297%2fa-rating-still-unsecure-by-chromes-opinion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This server could not prove that it is www.zandu.biz; its security
certificate is from zandu.biz. This may be caused by a
misconfiguration or an attacker intercepting your connection.
The common name in your site's certificate is zandu.biz, which is not valid for a different name (www.zandu.biz). Moreover, you have a redirect from zandu.biz to www.zandu.biz, so if you use the name the certificate is valid for it redirects to the name that it isn't.
What you need is to get a certificate with both names.
New contributor
or Vetter a wildcard cert i. e. from Letsencrypt
– djdomi
8 hours ago
Wildcard certificates can be more convenient or necessary if the names you intend to use aren't actually known ahead of time. But they also increase your exposure if the associated private key is compromised because then the attacker can forge any name in your domain rather than only the ones that server was actually using.
– zrm
5 hours ago
Thank you @zrm. This was very helpful. I went from unsecure to not secure for some reason. It's a set in the right direction. Does this have to do with the fact that its not signed from a CA, just let's encrypt?
– The Architect
4 hours ago
Let's Encrypt is a CA. When they first started out they were cross-signed by IdenTrust but that ends in 2020 because their own root certificate is now widely trusted. None of that has anything to do with your problem, which would have been the same either way.
– zrm
3 hours ago
add a comment |
This server could not prove that it is www.zandu.biz; its security
certificate is from zandu.biz. This may be caused by a
misconfiguration or an attacker intercepting your connection.
The common name in your site's certificate is zandu.biz, which is not valid for a different name (www.zandu.biz). Moreover, you have a redirect from zandu.biz to www.zandu.biz, so if you use the name the certificate is valid for it redirects to the name that it isn't.
What you need is to get a certificate with both names.
New contributor
or Vetter a wildcard cert i. e. from Letsencrypt
– djdomi
8 hours ago
Wildcard certificates can be more convenient or necessary if the names you intend to use aren't actually known ahead of time. But they also increase your exposure if the associated private key is compromised because then the attacker can forge any name in your domain rather than only the ones that server was actually using.
– zrm
5 hours ago
Thank you @zrm. This was very helpful. I went from unsecure to not secure for some reason. It's a set in the right direction. Does this have to do with the fact that its not signed from a CA, just let's encrypt?
– The Architect
4 hours ago
Let's Encrypt is a CA. When they first started out they were cross-signed by IdenTrust but that ends in 2020 because their own root certificate is now widely trusted. None of that has anything to do with your problem, which would have been the same either way.
– zrm
3 hours ago
add a comment |
This server could not prove that it is www.zandu.biz; its security
certificate is from zandu.biz. This may be caused by a
misconfiguration or an attacker intercepting your connection.
The common name in your site's certificate is zandu.biz, which is not valid for a different name (www.zandu.biz). Moreover, you have a redirect from zandu.biz to www.zandu.biz, so if you use the name the certificate is valid for it redirects to the name that it isn't.
What you need is to get a certificate with both names.
New contributor
This server could not prove that it is www.zandu.biz; its security
certificate is from zandu.biz. This may be caused by a
misconfiguration or an attacker intercepting your connection.
The common name in your site's certificate is zandu.biz, which is not valid for a different name (www.zandu.biz). Moreover, you have a redirect from zandu.biz to www.zandu.biz, so if you use the name the certificate is valid for it redirects to the name that it isn't.
What you need is to get a certificate with both names.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 8 hours ago
zrmzrm
1013 bronze badges
1013 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
or Vetter a wildcard cert i. e. from Letsencrypt
– djdomi
8 hours ago
Wildcard certificates can be more convenient or necessary if the names you intend to use aren't actually known ahead of time. But they also increase your exposure if the associated private key is compromised because then the attacker can forge any name in your domain rather than only the ones that server was actually using.
– zrm
5 hours ago
Thank you @zrm. This was very helpful. I went from unsecure to not secure for some reason. It's a set in the right direction. Does this have to do with the fact that its not signed from a CA, just let's encrypt?
– The Architect
4 hours ago
Let's Encrypt is a CA. When they first started out they were cross-signed by IdenTrust but that ends in 2020 because their own root certificate is now widely trusted. None of that has anything to do with your problem, which would have been the same either way.
– zrm
3 hours ago
add a comment |
or Vetter a wildcard cert i. e. from Letsencrypt
– djdomi
8 hours ago
Wildcard certificates can be more convenient or necessary if the names you intend to use aren't actually known ahead of time. But they also increase your exposure if the associated private key is compromised because then the attacker can forge any name in your domain rather than only the ones that server was actually using.
– zrm
5 hours ago
Thank you @zrm. This was very helpful. I went from unsecure to not secure for some reason. It's a set in the right direction. Does this have to do with the fact that its not signed from a CA, just let's encrypt?
– The Architect
4 hours ago
Let's Encrypt is a CA. When they first started out they were cross-signed by IdenTrust but that ends in 2020 because their own root certificate is now widely trusted. None of that has anything to do with your problem, which would have been the same either way.
– zrm
3 hours ago
or Vetter a wildcard cert i. e. from Letsencrypt
– djdomi
8 hours ago
or Vetter a wildcard cert i. e. from Letsencrypt
– djdomi
8 hours ago
Wildcard certificates can be more convenient or necessary if the names you intend to use aren't actually known ahead of time. But they also increase your exposure if the associated private key is compromised because then the attacker can forge any name in your domain rather than only the ones that server was actually using.
– zrm
5 hours ago
Wildcard certificates can be more convenient or necessary if the names you intend to use aren't actually known ahead of time. But they also increase your exposure if the associated private key is compromised because then the attacker can forge any name in your domain rather than only the ones that server was actually using.
– zrm
5 hours ago
Thank you @zrm. This was very helpful. I went from unsecure to not secure for some reason. It's a set in the right direction. Does this have to do with the fact that its not signed from a CA, just let's encrypt?
– The Architect
4 hours ago
Thank you @zrm. This was very helpful. I went from unsecure to not secure for some reason. It's a set in the right direction. Does this have to do with the fact that its not signed from a CA, just let's encrypt?
– The Architect
4 hours ago
Let's Encrypt is a CA. When they first started out they were cross-signed by IdenTrust but that ends in 2020 because their own root certificate is now widely trusted. None of that has anything to do with your problem, which would have been the same either way.
– zrm
3 hours ago
Let's Encrypt is a CA. When they first started out they were cross-signed by IdenTrust but that ends in 2020 because their own root certificate is now widely trusted. None of that has anything to do with your problem, which would have been the same either way.
– zrm
3 hours ago
add a comment |
The Architect is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
The Architect is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
The Architect is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
The Architect is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f979297%2fa-rating-still-unsecure-by-chromes-opinion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown