Cycle of actions and voice signals on a multipitch climbAnchor without cordelette?Abandoning a multi pitch climbWhat do I do if I lose my belay plate?What to do at the top of a sport climb“Tag line”/“pull cord” for multipitch trad: what kind and when needed?Efficient and reliable method for managing a nut tool while following on a trad climb?Leader injured during multipitch trad climb, what to do?How to top belay 2 climbers at the same time on multi-pitch climb?Is there any difference between a harness used for rock climbing vs for mountaineering?What extra gear to take up a multipitch climb?

Why aren't rainbows blurred-out into nothing after they are produced?

Word for an event that will likely never happen again

A trip to the library

Go to last file in vim

What is the most difficult concept to grasp in Calculus 1?

Why is there a large performance impact when looping over an array over 240 elements?

Transition to "Starvation Mode" in Survival Situations

Are there really no countries that protect Freedom of Speech as the United States does?

(A room / an office) where an artist works

Link for download latest Edubuntu

How can God warn people of the upcoming rapture without disrupting society?

Did Pope Urban II issue the papal bull "terra nullius" in 1095?

Why command hierarchy, if the chain of command is standing next to each other?

Is this n-speak?

Why won't the Republicans use a superdelegate system like the DNC in their nomination process?

What can Amex do if I cancel their card after using the sign up bonus miles?

How do I call a 6-digit Australian phone number with a US-based mobile phone?

Causal Diagrams using Wolfram?

Is there a fallacy about "appeal to 'big words'"?

Are there any cons in using rounded corners for bar graphs?

Running code generated in realtime in JavaScript with eval()

Would the USA be eligible to join the European Union?

Boss wants me to ignore a software API license

What are the odds of rolling specific ability score totals in D&D?



Cycle of actions and voice signals on a multipitch climb


Anchor without cordelette?Abandoning a multi pitch climbWhat do I do if I lose my belay plate?What to do at the top of a sport climb“Tag line”/“pull cord” for multipitch trad: what kind and when needed?Efficient and reliable method for managing a nut tool while following on a trad climb?Leader injured during multipitch trad climb, what to do?How to top belay 2 climbers at the same time on multi-pitch climb?Is there any difference between a harness used for rock climbing vs for mountaineering?What extra gear to take up a multipitch climb?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















When climbing multipitch, what is the cycle of things you do when climbing each pitch, and what are the associated voice signals?










share|improve this question






























    3















    When climbing multipitch, what is the cycle of things you do when climbing each pitch, and what are the associated voice signals?










    share|improve this question


























      3












      3








      3








      When climbing multipitch, what is the cycle of things you do when climbing each pitch, and what are the associated voice signals?










      share|improve this question














      When climbing multipitch, what is the cycle of things you do when climbing each pitch, and what are the associated voice signals?







      rock-climbing mountaineering






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      Ben CrowellBen Crowell

      19k66 silver badges128 bronze badges




      19k66 silver badges128 bronze badges























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          Alice and Betty are climbing in a team of two. Let's start the cycle with both climbers together at a belay, both tied in to the anchor with clove hitches. Betty is going to lead the next pitch. The standard set of voice signals in America, which I'll use below, are the ones introduced by Paul Petzoldt. When the climbers address each other by name, it's so that there won't be confusion between different teams that are near each other.



          Betty gets together all the gear for her lead. If Alice and Betty are alternating leads, then Betty's end of the rope is already on top, and if they're using two cordelettes to construct their anchors, then Betty already has the cordelette that she cleaned from the previous anchor. If they're not swapping leads, and this will be the second pitch in a row that Betty is leading, then the rope needs to be flipped over, and Betty needs to get the other cordelette from Alice.



          Betty: "On belay?"



          Alice puts Betty on belay. "Belay on."



          Betty unties her clove. As a courtesy or in case it isn't clear, she can say "Climbing," to which Alice would answer "Climb."



          Betty does her lead, gets to the next belay station, builds an anchor, and ties in.



          Betty: "Alice, off belay!"



          Alice takes the rope out of her belay device. "Betty, belay off!"



          Betty pulls up the rest of the rope. When it's taut and pulling up on Alice's harness, Alice yells, "Betty, that's me!"



          Betty puts Alice on belay. "Alice, belay on!"



          Alice takes the anchor apart. When she's ready to climb, she yells "Betty, climbing!" so that Betty has a heads-up to expect that she needs to start pulling up rope. Betty responds, "Alice, climb!"



          Alice climbs the pitch, cleaning the gear. When she gets to the new anchor, she ties in. "Off belay."



          Betty takes her off belay. "Belay off."



          For situations where voice communication may be impossible, and the climbers may not even be able to see each other, they should discuss in advance how to handle that. Some people use systems of rope tugs, but in my experience those don't work very well. If the leader yells down "off belay" but there is no communication, then they can just pull up the rope slowly while the follower continues to feed it out through the belay device. If this type of situation is anticipated, then sometimes they will discuss this in advance, and the leader will just promise to put the follower on belay within a few minutes once the rope feels taut. If the rope may not be long enough to finish the pitch, sometimes people will agree in advance to simulclimb a short portion at the end so that the leader can reach the belay.






          share|improve this answer


































            3














            The German mountaineer and safety expert Pit Schubert advocates to reduce the signals down to two:



            (I'm reusing @Ben Crowell's terms since I know only the German words)



            1. Leader to belay: "Alice, off belay" (German: "Stand!") when the leader has built their own anchor point. If there is a line of sight to the belayer, the leader may also show both hands as a clear signal that they don't need them to climb anymore.

            2. Leader to belay: "Alice, belay on" (German: "Nachkommen!") when the leader is ready to belay the second climber.

            All other commands are redundant.






            share|improve this answer






















            • 1





              I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.

              – imsodin
              7 hours ago







            • 1





              Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)

              – Jasper
              7 hours ago











            • The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.

              – Jasper
              5 hours ago


















            0














            @BenCrowell describes the sequence nicely and @Jasper brings up reducing commands. Due to circumstances (no visual contact and out of earshot) and simply to reduce the yelling on the mountain (both for the pleasure of silence and security, as there is less that could be misunderstood, especially on crowded sections) it is beneficial to do so. I'll give an explanation why you need no signals in the cycle to stay save (and also which signals I consider still beneficial and why).



            There's two safety-critical moments:



            1. Leader reaches next belay, sets it up and secures themselves -> can be taken off belay.


            2. Leader takes second on belay after pulling up rope, such that they can clean the previous belay.


            Now lets assume you can't give a signal as you can't see or hear each other. Rope tugging signals aren't reliable either due to rope drag. How can you ensure swift continuation of the climb while staying save?



            1. Second just keeps belaying until the rope is up. Tedious, but save. This reduces calling "off belay" to an efficiency measure.


            2. The leader sets up everything for the belay before pulling the rope up. Then once they feel the end of the rope, they purposely leave some slack. Then finish setting up the belay with the rope and pull in the remaining slack, tightening the rope strongly. Thus the second knows they are on belay once the rope is constantly taught. This is good practice even if you use a command, as it reduces the time the second could make a mistake without being on belay.


            Essentially if I can give a signal, I always give the "off-belay" command, as it speeds up pulling up the rope. I don't give "on-belay" commands (except of course my rope partner explicitly requests it, in which they'll have to listen to a sermon about the virtues of not doing so after the climb :) ).






            share|improve this answer



























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "395"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2foutdoors.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f22858%2fcycle-of-actions-and-voice-signals-on-a-multipitch-climb%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3














              Alice and Betty are climbing in a team of two. Let's start the cycle with both climbers together at a belay, both tied in to the anchor with clove hitches. Betty is going to lead the next pitch. The standard set of voice signals in America, which I'll use below, are the ones introduced by Paul Petzoldt. When the climbers address each other by name, it's so that there won't be confusion between different teams that are near each other.



              Betty gets together all the gear for her lead. If Alice and Betty are alternating leads, then Betty's end of the rope is already on top, and if they're using two cordelettes to construct their anchors, then Betty already has the cordelette that she cleaned from the previous anchor. If they're not swapping leads, and this will be the second pitch in a row that Betty is leading, then the rope needs to be flipped over, and Betty needs to get the other cordelette from Alice.



              Betty: "On belay?"



              Alice puts Betty on belay. "Belay on."



              Betty unties her clove. As a courtesy or in case it isn't clear, she can say "Climbing," to which Alice would answer "Climb."



              Betty does her lead, gets to the next belay station, builds an anchor, and ties in.



              Betty: "Alice, off belay!"



              Alice takes the rope out of her belay device. "Betty, belay off!"



              Betty pulls up the rest of the rope. When it's taut and pulling up on Alice's harness, Alice yells, "Betty, that's me!"



              Betty puts Alice on belay. "Alice, belay on!"



              Alice takes the anchor apart. When she's ready to climb, she yells "Betty, climbing!" so that Betty has a heads-up to expect that she needs to start pulling up rope. Betty responds, "Alice, climb!"



              Alice climbs the pitch, cleaning the gear. When she gets to the new anchor, she ties in. "Off belay."



              Betty takes her off belay. "Belay off."



              For situations where voice communication may be impossible, and the climbers may not even be able to see each other, they should discuss in advance how to handle that. Some people use systems of rope tugs, but in my experience those don't work very well. If the leader yells down "off belay" but there is no communication, then they can just pull up the rope slowly while the follower continues to feed it out through the belay device. If this type of situation is anticipated, then sometimes they will discuss this in advance, and the leader will just promise to put the follower on belay within a few minutes once the rope feels taut. If the rope may not be long enough to finish the pitch, sometimes people will agree in advance to simulclimb a short portion at the end so that the leader can reach the belay.






              share|improve this answer































                3














                Alice and Betty are climbing in a team of two. Let's start the cycle with both climbers together at a belay, both tied in to the anchor with clove hitches. Betty is going to lead the next pitch. The standard set of voice signals in America, which I'll use below, are the ones introduced by Paul Petzoldt. When the climbers address each other by name, it's so that there won't be confusion between different teams that are near each other.



                Betty gets together all the gear for her lead. If Alice and Betty are alternating leads, then Betty's end of the rope is already on top, and if they're using two cordelettes to construct their anchors, then Betty already has the cordelette that she cleaned from the previous anchor. If they're not swapping leads, and this will be the second pitch in a row that Betty is leading, then the rope needs to be flipped over, and Betty needs to get the other cordelette from Alice.



                Betty: "On belay?"



                Alice puts Betty on belay. "Belay on."



                Betty unties her clove. As a courtesy or in case it isn't clear, she can say "Climbing," to which Alice would answer "Climb."



                Betty does her lead, gets to the next belay station, builds an anchor, and ties in.



                Betty: "Alice, off belay!"



                Alice takes the rope out of her belay device. "Betty, belay off!"



                Betty pulls up the rest of the rope. When it's taut and pulling up on Alice's harness, Alice yells, "Betty, that's me!"



                Betty puts Alice on belay. "Alice, belay on!"



                Alice takes the anchor apart. When she's ready to climb, she yells "Betty, climbing!" so that Betty has a heads-up to expect that she needs to start pulling up rope. Betty responds, "Alice, climb!"



                Alice climbs the pitch, cleaning the gear. When she gets to the new anchor, she ties in. "Off belay."



                Betty takes her off belay. "Belay off."



                For situations where voice communication may be impossible, and the climbers may not even be able to see each other, they should discuss in advance how to handle that. Some people use systems of rope tugs, but in my experience those don't work very well. If the leader yells down "off belay" but there is no communication, then they can just pull up the rope slowly while the follower continues to feed it out through the belay device. If this type of situation is anticipated, then sometimes they will discuss this in advance, and the leader will just promise to put the follower on belay within a few minutes once the rope feels taut. If the rope may not be long enough to finish the pitch, sometimes people will agree in advance to simulclimb a short portion at the end so that the leader can reach the belay.






                share|improve this answer





























                  3












                  3








                  3







                  Alice and Betty are climbing in a team of two. Let's start the cycle with both climbers together at a belay, both tied in to the anchor with clove hitches. Betty is going to lead the next pitch. The standard set of voice signals in America, which I'll use below, are the ones introduced by Paul Petzoldt. When the climbers address each other by name, it's so that there won't be confusion between different teams that are near each other.



                  Betty gets together all the gear for her lead. If Alice and Betty are alternating leads, then Betty's end of the rope is already on top, and if they're using two cordelettes to construct their anchors, then Betty already has the cordelette that she cleaned from the previous anchor. If they're not swapping leads, and this will be the second pitch in a row that Betty is leading, then the rope needs to be flipped over, and Betty needs to get the other cordelette from Alice.



                  Betty: "On belay?"



                  Alice puts Betty on belay. "Belay on."



                  Betty unties her clove. As a courtesy or in case it isn't clear, she can say "Climbing," to which Alice would answer "Climb."



                  Betty does her lead, gets to the next belay station, builds an anchor, and ties in.



                  Betty: "Alice, off belay!"



                  Alice takes the rope out of her belay device. "Betty, belay off!"



                  Betty pulls up the rest of the rope. When it's taut and pulling up on Alice's harness, Alice yells, "Betty, that's me!"



                  Betty puts Alice on belay. "Alice, belay on!"



                  Alice takes the anchor apart. When she's ready to climb, she yells "Betty, climbing!" so that Betty has a heads-up to expect that she needs to start pulling up rope. Betty responds, "Alice, climb!"



                  Alice climbs the pitch, cleaning the gear. When she gets to the new anchor, she ties in. "Off belay."



                  Betty takes her off belay. "Belay off."



                  For situations where voice communication may be impossible, and the climbers may not even be able to see each other, they should discuss in advance how to handle that. Some people use systems of rope tugs, but in my experience those don't work very well. If the leader yells down "off belay" but there is no communication, then they can just pull up the rope slowly while the follower continues to feed it out through the belay device. If this type of situation is anticipated, then sometimes they will discuss this in advance, and the leader will just promise to put the follower on belay within a few minutes once the rope feels taut. If the rope may not be long enough to finish the pitch, sometimes people will agree in advance to simulclimb a short portion at the end so that the leader can reach the belay.






                  share|improve this answer















                  Alice and Betty are climbing in a team of two. Let's start the cycle with both climbers together at a belay, both tied in to the anchor with clove hitches. Betty is going to lead the next pitch. The standard set of voice signals in America, which I'll use below, are the ones introduced by Paul Petzoldt. When the climbers address each other by name, it's so that there won't be confusion between different teams that are near each other.



                  Betty gets together all the gear for her lead. If Alice and Betty are alternating leads, then Betty's end of the rope is already on top, and if they're using two cordelettes to construct their anchors, then Betty already has the cordelette that she cleaned from the previous anchor. If they're not swapping leads, and this will be the second pitch in a row that Betty is leading, then the rope needs to be flipped over, and Betty needs to get the other cordelette from Alice.



                  Betty: "On belay?"



                  Alice puts Betty on belay. "Belay on."



                  Betty unties her clove. As a courtesy or in case it isn't clear, she can say "Climbing," to which Alice would answer "Climb."



                  Betty does her lead, gets to the next belay station, builds an anchor, and ties in.



                  Betty: "Alice, off belay!"



                  Alice takes the rope out of her belay device. "Betty, belay off!"



                  Betty pulls up the rest of the rope. When it's taut and pulling up on Alice's harness, Alice yells, "Betty, that's me!"



                  Betty puts Alice on belay. "Alice, belay on!"



                  Alice takes the anchor apart. When she's ready to climb, she yells "Betty, climbing!" so that Betty has a heads-up to expect that she needs to start pulling up rope. Betty responds, "Alice, climb!"



                  Alice climbs the pitch, cleaning the gear. When she gets to the new anchor, she ties in. "Off belay."



                  Betty takes her off belay. "Belay off."



                  For situations where voice communication may be impossible, and the climbers may not even be able to see each other, they should discuss in advance how to handle that. Some people use systems of rope tugs, but in my experience those don't work very well. If the leader yells down "off belay" but there is no communication, then they can just pull up the rope slowly while the follower continues to feed it out through the belay device. If this type of situation is anticipated, then sometimes they will discuss this in advance, and the leader will just promise to put the follower on belay within a few minutes once the rope feels taut. If the rope may not be long enough to finish the pitch, sometimes people will agree in advance to simulclimb a short portion at the end so that the leader can reach the belay.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 8 hours ago

























                  answered 8 hours ago









                  Ben CrowellBen Crowell

                  19k66 silver badges128 bronze badges




                  19k66 silver badges128 bronze badges


























                      3














                      The German mountaineer and safety expert Pit Schubert advocates to reduce the signals down to two:



                      (I'm reusing @Ben Crowell's terms since I know only the German words)



                      1. Leader to belay: "Alice, off belay" (German: "Stand!") when the leader has built their own anchor point. If there is a line of sight to the belayer, the leader may also show both hands as a clear signal that they don't need them to climb anymore.

                      2. Leader to belay: "Alice, belay on" (German: "Nachkommen!") when the leader is ready to belay the second climber.

                      All other commands are redundant.






                      share|improve this answer






















                      • 1





                        I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.

                        – imsodin
                        7 hours ago







                      • 1





                        Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)

                        – Jasper
                        7 hours ago











                      • The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.

                        – Jasper
                        5 hours ago















                      3














                      The German mountaineer and safety expert Pit Schubert advocates to reduce the signals down to two:



                      (I'm reusing @Ben Crowell's terms since I know only the German words)



                      1. Leader to belay: "Alice, off belay" (German: "Stand!") when the leader has built their own anchor point. If there is a line of sight to the belayer, the leader may also show both hands as a clear signal that they don't need them to climb anymore.

                      2. Leader to belay: "Alice, belay on" (German: "Nachkommen!") when the leader is ready to belay the second climber.

                      All other commands are redundant.






                      share|improve this answer






















                      • 1





                        I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.

                        – imsodin
                        7 hours ago







                      • 1





                        Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)

                        – Jasper
                        7 hours ago











                      • The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.

                        – Jasper
                        5 hours ago













                      3












                      3








                      3







                      The German mountaineer and safety expert Pit Schubert advocates to reduce the signals down to two:



                      (I'm reusing @Ben Crowell's terms since I know only the German words)



                      1. Leader to belay: "Alice, off belay" (German: "Stand!") when the leader has built their own anchor point. If there is a line of sight to the belayer, the leader may also show both hands as a clear signal that they don't need them to climb anymore.

                      2. Leader to belay: "Alice, belay on" (German: "Nachkommen!") when the leader is ready to belay the second climber.

                      All other commands are redundant.






                      share|improve this answer















                      The German mountaineer and safety expert Pit Schubert advocates to reduce the signals down to two:



                      (I'm reusing @Ben Crowell's terms since I know only the German words)



                      1. Leader to belay: "Alice, off belay" (German: "Stand!") when the leader has built their own anchor point. If there is a line of sight to the belayer, the leader may also show both hands as a clear signal that they don't need them to climb anymore.

                      2. Leader to belay: "Alice, belay on" (German: "Nachkommen!") when the leader is ready to belay the second climber.

                      All other commands are redundant.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 7 hours ago

























                      answered 7 hours ago









                      JasperJasper

                      9192 silver badges14 bronze badges




                      9192 silver badges14 bronze badges










                      • 1





                        I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.

                        – imsodin
                        7 hours ago







                      • 1





                        Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)

                        – Jasper
                        7 hours ago











                      • The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.

                        – Jasper
                        5 hours ago












                      • 1





                        I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.

                        – imsodin
                        7 hours ago







                      • 1





                        Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)

                        – Jasper
                        7 hours ago











                      • The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.

                        – Jasper
                        5 hours ago







                      1




                      1





                      I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.

                      – imsodin
                      7 hours ago






                      I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.

                      – imsodin
                      7 hours ago





                      1




                      1





                      Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)

                      – Jasper
                      7 hours ago





                      Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)

                      – Jasper
                      7 hours ago













                      The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.

                      – Jasper
                      5 hours ago





                      The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.

                      – Jasper
                      5 hours ago











                      0














                      @BenCrowell describes the sequence nicely and @Jasper brings up reducing commands. Due to circumstances (no visual contact and out of earshot) and simply to reduce the yelling on the mountain (both for the pleasure of silence and security, as there is less that could be misunderstood, especially on crowded sections) it is beneficial to do so. I'll give an explanation why you need no signals in the cycle to stay save (and also which signals I consider still beneficial and why).



                      There's two safety-critical moments:



                      1. Leader reaches next belay, sets it up and secures themselves -> can be taken off belay.


                      2. Leader takes second on belay after pulling up rope, such that they can clean the previous belay.


                      Now lets assume you can't give a signal as you can't see or hear each other. Rope tugging signals aren't reliable either due to rope drag. How can you ensure swift continuation of the climb while staying save?



                      1. Second just keeps belaying until the rope is up. Tedious, but save. This reduces calling "off belay" to an efficiency measure.


                      2. The leader sets up everything for the belay before pulling the rope up. Then once they feel the end of the rope, they purposely leave some slack. Then finish setting up the belay with the rope and pull in the remaining slack, tightening the rope strongly. Thus the second knows they are on belay once the rope is constantly taught. This is good practice even if you use a command, as it reduces the time the second could make a mistake without being on belay.


                      Essentially if I can give a signal, I always give the "off-belay" command, as it speeds up pulling up the rope. I don't give "on-belay" commands (except of course my rope partner explicitly requests it, in which they'll have to listen to a sermon about the virtues of not doing so after the climb :) ).






                      share|improve this answer





























                        0














                        @BenCrowell describes the sequence nicely and @Jasper brings up reducing commands. Due to circumstances (no visual contact and out of earshot) and simply to reduce the yelling on the mountain (both for the pleasure of silence and security, as there is less that could be misunderstood, especially on crowded sections) it is beneficial to do so. I'll give an explanation why you need no signals in the cycle to stay save (and also which signals I consider still beneficial and why).



                        There's two safety-critical moments:



                        1. Leader reaches next belay, sets it up and secures themselves -> can be taken off belay.


                        2. Leader takes second on belay after pulling up rope, such that they can clean the previous belay.


                        Now lets assume you can't give a signal as you can't see or hear each other. Rope tugging signals aren't reliable either due to rope drag. How can you ensure swift continuation of the climb while staying save?



                        1. Second just keeps belaying until the rope is up. Tedious, but save. This reduces calling "off belay" to an efficiency measure.


                        2. The leader sets up everything for the belay before pulling the rope up. Then once they feel the end of the rope, they purposely leave some slack. Then finish setting up the belay with the rope and pull in the remaining slack, tightening the rope strongly. Thus the second knows they are on belay once the rope is constantly taught. This is good practice even if you use a command, as it reduces the time the second could make a mistake without being on belay.


                        Essentially if I can give a signal, I always give the "off-belay" command, as it speeds up pulling up the rope. I don't give "on-belay" commands (except of course my rope partner explicitly requests it, in which they'll have to listen to a sermon about the virtues of not doing so after the climb :) ).






                        share|improve this answer



























                          0












                          0








                          0







                          @BenCrowell describes the sequence nicely and @Jasper brings up reducing commands. Due to circumstances (no visual contact and out of earshot) and simply to reduce the yelling on the mountain (both for the pleasure of silence and security, as there is less that could be misunderstood, especially on crowded sections) it is beneficial to do so. I'll give an explanation why you need no signals in the cycle to stay save (and also which signals I consider still beneficial and why).



                          There's two safety-critical moments:



                          1. Leader reaches next belay, sets it up and secures themselves -> can be taken off belay.


                          2. Leader takes second on belay after pulling up rope, such that they can clean the previous belay.


                          Now lets assume you can't give a signal as you can't see or hear each other. Rope tugging signals aren't reliable either due to rope drag. How can you ensure swift continuation of the climb while staying save?



                          1. Second just keeps belaying until the rope is up. Tedious, but save. This reduces calling "off belay" to an efficiency measure.


                          2. The leader sets up everything for the belay before pulling the rope up. Then once they feel the end of the rope, they purposely leave some slack. Then finish setting up the belay with the rope and pull in the remaining slack, tightening the rope strongly. Thus the second knows they are on belay once the rope is constantly taught. This is good practice even if you use a command, as it reduces the time the second could make a mistake without being on belay.


                          Essentially if I can give a signal, I always give the "off-belay" command, as it speeds up pulling up the rope. I don't give "on-belay" commands (except of course my rope partner explicitly requests it, in which they'll have to listen to a sermon about the virtues of not doing so after the climb :) ).






                          share|improve this answer













                          @BenCrowell describes the sequence nicely and @Jasper brings up reducing commands. Due to circumstances (no visual contact and out of earshot) and simply to reduce the yelling on the mountain (both for the pleasure of silence and security, as there is less that could be misunderstood, especially on crowded sections) it is beneficial to do so. I'll give an explanation why you need no signals in the cycle to stay save (and also which signals I consider still beneficial and why).



                          There's two safety-critical moments:



                          1. Leader reaches next belay, sets it up and secures themselves -> can be taken off belay.


                          2. Leader takes second on belay after pulling up rope, such that they can clean the previous belay.


                          Now lets assume you can't give a signal as you can't see or hear each other. Rope tugging signals aren't reliable either due to rope drag. How can you ensure swift continuation of the climb while staying save?



                          1. Second just keeps belaying until the rope is up. Tedious, but save. This reduces calling "off belay" to an efficiency measure.


                          2. The leader sets up everything for the belay before pulling the rope up. Then once they feel the end of the rope, they purposely leave some slack. Then finish setting up the belay with the rope and pull in the remaining slack, tightening the rope strongly. Thus the second knows they are on belay once the rope is constantly taught. This is good practice even if you use a command, as it reduces the time the second could make a mistake without being on belay.


                          Essentially if I can give a signal, I always give the "off-belay" command, as it speeds up pulling up the rope. I don't give "on-belay" commands (except of course my rope partner explicitly requests it, in which they'll have to listen to a sermon about the virtues of not doing so after the climb :) ).







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 7 hours ago









                          imsodinimsodin

                          19.6k2 gold badges67 silver badges122 bronze badges




                          19.6k2 gold badges67 silver badges122 bronze badges






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to The Great Outdoors Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2foutdoors.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f22858%2fcycle-of-actions-and-voice-signals-on-a-multipitch-climb%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                              Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                              Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367