Is it possible to know the exact chord from the roman numeralsHow do I determine the chord progression Roman numerals?I am playing a song in D Major, and it contains an Am. How do I notate this in roman numerals?Roman numerals analysisCadences: Voicing and Roman numeralsChord progression, how to add the bass properlyHow to identify the chord progression and a specific chordUsing Roman Numeral Notation with Notes in the Bass (not figured bass)Are all modes relative to Ionian (major) in Roman numeral analysis?How to write Roman numeral figures for non-chord tones (NCT) and inversions, triads and seventh chords?Chord symbol and Roman numeral for naming an Augmented 6th chord
What is the farthest a camera can see?
A torrent of foreign terms
Escape Velocity - Won't the orbital path just become larger with higher initial velocity?
In which case does the Security misconfiguration vulnerability apply to?
What are those bumps on top of the Antonov-225?
Why does Japan use the same type of AC power outlet as the US?
Help, I cannot decide when to start the story
Is there a way to proportionalize fixed costs in a MILP?
Running code generated in realtime in JavaScript with eval()
Stephen King and steam/diesel/cyber-punk
Big number puzzle
Does an object storing more internal energy emit more thermal radiation?
Scam? Phone call from "Department of Social Security" asking me to call back
Causal Diagrams using Wolfram?
How can I find an old paper when the usual methods fail?
Doesn't the speed of light limit imply the same electron can be annihilated twice?
Would the USA be eligible to join the European Union?
Why is there a large performance impact when looping over an array over 240 elements?
Telephone number in spoken words
Lípínguapua dopo Pêpê
When did Bilbo and Frodo learn that Gandalf was a Maia?
Did Pope Urban II issue the papal bull "terra nullius" in 1095?
Should I leave building the database for the end?
How far did Gandalf and the Balrog drop from the bridge in Moria?
Is it possible to know the exact chord from the roman numerals
How do I determine the chord progression Roman numerals?I am playing a song in D Major, and it contains an Am. How do I notate this in roman numerals?Roman numerals analysisCadences: Voicing and Roman numeralsChord progression, how to add the bass properlyHow to identify the chord progression and a specific chordUsing Roman Numeral Notation with Notes in the Bass (not figured bass)Are all modes relative to Ionian (major) in Roman numeral analysis?How to write Roman numeral figures for non-chord tones (NCT) and inversions, triads and seventh chords?Chord symbol and Roman numeral for naming an Augmented 6th chord
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I was taking a look at this chord progression and attempted to play it just using the roman numerals.
Seeing the V(G) I played what would be the right most G in the image with the B and D above it so that all the notes are in one octave worth of the scale (Is there a better way to describe this?) but clicking on it shows the exact keys played are different.
Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D or is that information not part of the roman numerals above and simply a style choice / inconsequential.
chord-progressions roman-numerals
add a comment |
I was taking a look at this chord progression and attempted to play it just using the roman numerals.
Seeing the V(G) I played what would be the right most G in the image with the B and D above it so that all the notes are in one octave worth of the scale (Is there a better way to describe this?) but clicking on it shows the exact keys played are different.
Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D or is that information not part of the roman numerals above and simply a style choice / inconsequential.
chord-progressions roman-numerals
Does this software only do root position symbols without Arabic numerals - likeI- or does it also do Arabic numerals - likeI6orIV6/4?
– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
add a comment |
I was taking a look at this chord progression and attempted to play it just using the roman numerals.
Seeing the V(G) I played what would be the right most G in the image with the B and D above it so that all the notes are in one octave worth of the scale (Is there a better way to describe this?) but clicking on it shows the exact keys played are different.
Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D or is that information not part of the roman numerals above and simply a style choice / inconsequential.
chord-progressions roman-numerals
I was taking a look at this chord progression and attempted to play it just using the roman numerals.
Seeing the V(G) I played what would be the right most G in the image with the B and D above it so that all the notes are in one octave worth of the scale (Is there a better way to describe this?) but clicking on it shows the exact keys played are different.
Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D or is that information not part of the roman numerals above and simply a style choice / inconsequential.
chord-progressions roman-numerals
chord-progressions roman-numerals
asked 8 hours ago
QwertieQwertie
1655 bronze badges
1655 bronze badges
Does this software only do root position symbols without Arabic numerals - likeI- or does it also do Arabic numerals - likeI6orIV6/4?
– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Does this software only do root position symbols without Arabic numerals - likeI- or does it also do Arabic numerals - likeI6orIV6/4?
– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
Does this software only do root position symbols without Arabic numerals - like
I - or does it also do Arabic numerals - like I6 or IV6/4?– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
Does this software only do root position symbols without Arabic numerals - like
I - or does it also do Arabic numerals - like I6 or IV6/4?– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Where you play the notes - in which ocatve, or even how they split - root in bass and others in r.h., or split them two with each, etc., is very much up to you, as the player. It's called voicing, and as PiedPiper says, when all the notes are as close as possible, it's called 'close position' or 'close voicing'. The opposite being 'open voicing'.
It matters not how many of each note gets played - and sometimes the 5 gets omitted, as the root gives the chord's name, and the 3 gives it its major or minor, an important fact when playing/naming chords. There really is no right or wrong with voicings. There is of course 'appropriate'!
With RN, it merely gives the number of the chord in that situation. There are so many different voicings available, it would be impossible to use a simple means to tell. Except, of course, writing the actual notes. But then that wouldn't be immediately transferrable to different keys.
add a comment |
The only thing about the distribution of voices that Roman numeral analysis provides is which voice is in the bass.
Just some background on the symbols...
The Arabic numerals added to Roman numerals are a historical hold over from figured bass and an approach to harmony that was more about counterpoint. The figures told a keyboard accompanist what type of chord to use to harmonize a written bass part, but they were free to improvise the voicing and figuration of the chord. Most of the time there would be written melody parts as well. So in essence the Arabic numerals told the keyboard accompanist how to play harmonic filler with their right hand with no particular concern for the exact voicing or figuration of the chords.
So there is a odd historic evolution of the chord symbols. Figured bass put numeric figures on a written bass part. Later in the Roman numeral analysis (RNA) system the figures were added to the Roman numerals - which give only a chord root - and the bass part is abstracted. Neither system gives specifics about the upper voices.
EDIT
After re-reading your question I'm confused about what exactly you are trying to figure out.
Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D...
In Roman numeral analysis (RNA), yes, you can indicate the G is above the B and D by using the 6 figure - like G: I6. But, properly speaking that I6 means the third of the chord is in the bass. It does not necessarily mean G is above the D. Listing tones from bass up to treble I6 can mean B G D or B D G.
...or is that information not part of the roman numerals above...
It isn't clear if the screen shot you provided is of software that cannot display the Arabic figures on the Roman numerals
...or is that information... simply a style choice / inconsequential.
I would say it is not inconsequential and important to style. Pop/rock style doesn't typically use RNA for chord symbols so it's a bit hard to explain. Pop/rock often uses chord names and 'slash notation' - like F/C to mean an F major chord over a C bass. In RNA it could be C: IV6/4.
Pop/rock often uses chords in root position in which case the Arabic numeral figures would see inconsequential. Or, if the slash notation is used, some people aren't even aware of the concept of chord inversion.
Nevertheless, chord inversion is important in rock music. In a progression that is supposed to be played with all root position chords, if the bass starts playing the thirds of the chords, it won't sound right. Regardless of the type of chord symbols used, any software's ability to display a chord symbol, or a musicians understanding of these things, the inversions are being used and they are an important aspect of any musical style.
RN tells what the chord name and function is. How does it tell which voice is in the bass? Unless one assumes all chords will be played in root position.
– Tim
5 hours ago
Ex.Dm: i6the chord isDminor and the third of the chord is the bass, the bass isFnatural.
– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
Maybe I misunderstand the question and the software only displays root position chords.
– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
add a comment |
The roman numerals say nothing about how you distribute the notes in the chord. The V chord contains the notes G, B and D, but you can play them anywhere.
If you play the chord so that all the notes are within one octave, this is known as 'close position'.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87745%2fis-it-possible-to-know-the-exact-chord-from-the-roman-numerals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Where you play the notes - in which ocatve, or even how they split - root in bass and others in r.h., or split them two with each, etc., is very much up to you, as the player. It's called voicing, and as PiedPiper says, when all the notes are as close as possible, it's called 'close position' or 'close voicing'. The opposite being 'open voicing'.
It matters not how many of each note gets played - and sometimes the 5 gets omitted, as the root gives the chord's name, and the 3 gives it its major or minor, an important fact when playing/naming chords. There really is no right or wrong with voicings. There is of course 'appropriate'!
With RN, it merely gives the number of the chord in that situation. There are so many different voicings available, it would be impossible to use a simple means to tell. Except, of course, writing the actual notes. But then that wouldn't be immediately transferrable to different keys.
add a comment |
Where you play the notes - in which ocatve, or even how they split - root in bass and others in r.h., or split them two with each, etc., is very much up to you, as the player. It's called voicing, and as PiedPiper says, when all the notes are as close as possible, it's called 'close position' or 'close voicing'. The opposite being 'open voicing'.
It matters not how many of each note gets played - and sometimes the 5 gets omitted, as the root gives the chord's name, and the 3 gives it its major or minor, an important fact when playing/naming chords. There really is no right or wrong with voicings. There is of course 'appropriate'!
With RN, it merely gives the number of the chord in that situation. There are so many different voicings available, it would be impossible to use a simple means to tell. Except, of course, writing the actual notes. But then that wouldn't be immediately transferrable to different keys.
add a comment |
Where you play the notes - in which ocatve, or even how they split - root in bass and others in r.h., or split them two with each, etc., is very much up to you, as the player. It's called voicing, and as PiedPiper says, when all the notes are as close as possible, it's called 'close position' or 'close voicing'. The opposite being 'open voicing'.
It matters not how many of each note gets played - and sometimes the 5 gets omitted, as the root gives the chord's name, and the 3 gives it its major or minor, an important fact when playing/naming chords. There really is no right or wrong with voicings. There is of course 'appropriate'!
With RN, it merely gives the number of the chord in that situation. There are so many different voicings available, it would be impossible to use a simple means to tell. Except, of course, writing the actual notes. But then that wouldn't be immediately transferrable to different keys.
Where you play the notes - in which ocatve, or even how they split - root in bass and others in r.h., or split them two with each, etc., is very much up to you, as the player. It's called voicing, and as PiedPiper says, when all the notes are as close as possible, it's called 'close position' or 'close voicing'. The opposite being 'open voicing'.
It matters not how many of each note gets played - and sometimes the 5 gets omitted, as the root gives the chord's name, and the 3 gives it its major or minor, an important fact when playing/naming chords. There really is no right or wrong with voicings. There is of course 'appropriate'!
With RN, it merely gives the number of the chord in that situation. There are so many different voicings available, it would be impossible to use a simple means to tell. Except, of course, writing the actual notes. But then that wouldn't be immediately transferrable to different keys.
answered 8 hours ago
TimTim
112k11 gold badges110 silver badges283 bronze badges
112k11 gold badges110 silver badges283 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
The only thing about the distribution of voices that Roman numeral analysis provides is which voice is in the bass.
Just some background on the symbols...
The Arabic numerals added to Roman numerals are a historical hold over from figured bass and an approach to harmony that was more about counterpoint. The figures told a keyboard accompanist what type of chord to use to harmonize a written bass part, but they were free to improvise the voicing and figuration of the chord. Most of the time there would be written melody parts as well. So in essence the Arabic numerals told the keyboard accompanist how to play harmonic filler with their right hand with no particular concern for the exact voicing or figuration of the chords.
So there is a odd historic evolution of the chord symbols. Figured bass put numeric figures on a written bass part. Later in the Roman numeral analysis (RNA) system the figures were added to the Roman numerals - which give only a chord root - and the bass part is abstracted. Neither system gives specifics about the upper voices.
EDIT
After re-reading your question I'm confused about what exactly you are trying to figure out.
Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D...
In Roman numeral analysis (RNA), yes, you can indicate the G is above the B and D by using the 6 figure - like G: I6. But, properly speaking that I6 means the third of the chord is in the bass. It does not necessarily mean G is above the D. Listing tones from bass up to treble I6 can mean B G D or B D G.
...or is that information not part of the roman numerals above...
It isn't clear if the screen shot you provided is of software that cannot display the Arabic figures on the Roman numerals
...or is that information... simply a style choice / inconsequential.
I would say it is not inconsequential and important to style. Pop/rock style doesn't typically use RNA for chord symbols so it's a bit hard to explain. Pop/rock often uses chord names and 'slash notation' - like F/C to mean an F major chord over a C bass. In RNA it could be C: IV6/4.
Pop/rock often uses chords in root position in which case the Arabic numeral figures would see inconsequential. Or, if the slash notation is used, some people aren't even aware of the concept of chord inversion.
Nevertheless, chord inversion is important in rock music. In a progression that is supposed to be played with all root position chords, if the bass starts playing the thirds of the chords, it won't sound right. Regardless of the type of chord symbols used, any software's ability to display a chord symbol, or a musicians understanding of these things, the inversions are being used and they are an important aspect of any musical style.
RN tells what the chord name and function is. How does it tell which voice is in the bass? Unless one assumes all chords will be played in root position.
– Tim
5 hours ago
Ex.Dm: i6the chord isDminor and the third of the chord is the bass, the bass isFnatural.
– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
Maybe I misunderstand the question and the software only displays root position chords.
– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
add a comment |
The only thing about the distribution of voices that Roman numeral analysis provides is which voice is in the bass.
Just some background on the symbols...
The Arabic numerals added to Roman numerals are a historical hold over from figured bass and an approach to harmony that was more about counterpoint. The figures told a keyboard accompanist what type of chord to use to harmonize a written bass part, but they were free to improvise the voicing and figuration of the chord. Most of the time there would be written melody parts as well. So in essence the Arabic numerals told the keyboard accompanist how to play harmonic filler with their right hand with no particular concern for the exact voicing or figuration of the chords.
So there is a odd historic evolution of the chord symbols. Figured bass put numeric figures on a written bass part. Later in the Roman numeral analysis (RNA) system the figures were added to the Roman numerals - which give only a chord root - and the bass part is abstracted. Neither system gives specifics about the upper voices.
EDIT
After re-reading your question I'm confused about what exactly you are trying to figure out.
Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D...
In Roman numeral analysis (RNA), yes, you can indicate the G is above the B and D by using the 6 figure - like G: I6. But, properly speaking that I6 means the third of the chord is in the bass. It does not necessarily mean G is above the D. Listing tones from bass up to treble I6 can mean B G D or B D G.
...or is that information not part of the roman numerals above...
It isn't clear if the screen shot you provided is of software that cannot display the Arabic figures on the Roman numerals
...or is that information... simply a style choice / inconsequential.
I would say it is not inconsequential and important to style. Pop/rock style doesn't typically use RNA for chord symbols so it's a bit hard to explain. Pop/rock often uses chord names and 'slash notation' - like F/C to mean an F major chord over a C bass. In RNA it could be C: IV6/4.
Pop/rock often uses chords in root position in which case the Arabic numeral figures would see inconsequential. Or, if the slash notation is used, some people aren't even aware of the concept of chord inversion.
Nevertheless, chord inversion is important in rock music. In a progression that is supposed to be played with all root position chords, if the bass starts playing the thirds of the chords, it won't sound right. Regardless of the type of chord symbols used, any software's ability to display a chord symbol, or a musicians understanding of these things, the inversions are being used and they are an important aspect of any musical style.
RN tells what the chord name and function is. How does it tell which voice is in the bass? Unless one assumes all chords will be played in root position.
– Tim
5 hours ago
Ex.Dm: i6the chord isDminor and the third of the chord is the bass, the bass isFnatural.
– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
Maybe I misunderstand the question and the software only displays root position chords.
– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
add a comment |
The only thing about the distribution of voices that Roman numeral analysis provides is which voice is in the bass.
Just some background on the symbols...
The Arabic numerals added to Roman numerals are a historical hold over from figured bass and an approach to harmony that was more about counterpoint. The figures told a keyboard accompanist what type of chord to use to harmonize a written bass part, but they were free to improvise the voicing and figuration of the chord. Most of the time there would be written melody parts as well. So in essence the Arabic numerals told the keyboard accompanist how to play harmonic filler with their right hand with no particular concern for the exact voicing or figuration of the chords.
So there is a odd historic evolution of the chord symbols. Figured bass put numeric figures on a written bass part. Later in the Roman numeral analysis (RNA) system the figures were added to the Roman numerals - which give only a chord root - and the bass part is abstracted. Neither system gives specifics about the upper voices.
EDIT
After re-reading your question I'm confused about what exactly you are trying to figure out.
Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D...
In Roman numeral analysis (RNA), yes, you can indicate the G is above the B and D by using the 6 figure - like G: I6. But, properly speaking that I6 means the third of the chord is in the bass. It does not necessarily mean G is above the D. Listing tones from bass up to treble I6 can mean B G D or B D G.
...or is that information not part of the roman numerals above...
It isn't clear if the screen shot you provided is of software that cannot display the Arabic figures on the Roman numerals
...or is that information... simply a style choice / inconsequential.
I would say it is not inconsequential and important to style. Pop/rock style doesn't typically use RNA for chord symbols so it's a bit hard to explain. Pop/rock often uses chord names and 'slash notation' - like F/C to mean an F major chord over a C bass. In RNA it could be C: IV6/4.
Pop/rock often uses chords in root position in which case the Arabic numeral figures would see inconsequential. Or, if the slash notation is used, some people aren't even aware of the concept of chord inversion.
Nevertheless, chord inversion is important in rock music. In a progression that is supposed to be played with all root position chords, if the bass starts playing the thirds of the chords, it won't sound right. Regardless of the type of chord symbols used, any software's ability to display a chord symbol, or a musicians understanding of these things, the inversions are being used and they are an important aspect of any musical style.
The only thing about the distribution of voices that Roman numeral analysis provides is which voice is in the bass.
Just some background on the symbols...
The Arabic numerals added to Roman numerals are a historical hold over from figured bass and an approach to harmony that was more about counterpoint. The figures told a keyboard accompanist what type of chord to use to harmonize a written bass part, but they were free to improvise the voicing and figuration of the chord. Most of the time there would be written melody parts as well. So in essence the Arabic numerals told the keyboard accompanist how to play harmonic filler with their right hand with no particular concern for the exact voicing or figuration of the chords.
So there is a odd historic evolution of the chord symbols. Figured bass put numeric figures on a written bass part. Later in the Roman numeral analysis (RNA) system the figures were added to the Roman numerals - which give only a chord root - and the bass part is abstracted. Neither system gives specifics about the upper voices.
EDIT
After re-reading your question I'm confused about what exactly you are trying to figure out.
Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D...
In Roman numeral analysis (RNA), yes, you can indicate the G is above the B and D by using the 6 figure - like G: I6. But, properly speaking that I6 means the third of the chord is in the bass. It does not necessarily mean G is above the D. Listing tones from bass up to treble I6 can mean B G D or B D G.
...or is that information not part of the roman numerals above...
It isn't clear if the screen shot you provided is of software that cannot display the Arabic figures on the Roman numerals
...or is that information... simply a style choice / inconsequential.
I would say it is not inconsequential and important to style. Pop/rock style doesn't typically use RNA for chord symbols so it's a bit hard to explain. Pop/rock often uses chord names and 'slash notation' - like F/C to mean an F major chord over a C bass. In RNA it could be C: IV6/4.
Pop/rock often uses chords in root position in which case the Arabic numeral figures would see inconsequential. Or, if the slash notation is used, some people aren't even aware of the concept of chord inversion.
Nevertheless, chord inversion is important in rock music. In a progression that is supposed to be played with all root position chords, if the bass starts playing the thirds of the chords, it won't sound right. Regardless of the type of chord symbols used, any software's ability to display a chord symbol, or a musicians understanding of these things, the inversions are being used and they are an important aspect of any musical style.
edited 4 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
Michael CurtisMichael Curtis
17.4k12 silver badges58 bronze badges
17.4k12 silver badges58 bronze badges
RN tells what the chord name and function is. How does it tell which voice is in the bass? Unless one assumes all chords will be played in root position.
– Tim
5 hours ago
Ex.Dm: i6the chord isDminor and the third of the chord is the bass, the bass isFnatural.
– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
Maybe I misunderstand the question and the software only displays root position chords.
– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
add a comment |
RN tells what the chord name and function is. How does it tell which voice is in the bass? Unless one assumes all chords will be played in root position.
– Tim
5 hours ago
Ex.Dm: i6the chord isDminor and the third of the chord is the bass, the bass isFnatural.
– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
Maybe I misunderstand the question and the software only displays root position chords.
– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
RN tells what the chord name and function is. How does it tell which voice is in the bass? Unless one assumes all chords will be played in root position.
– Tim
5 hours ago
RN tells what the chord name and function is. How does it tell which voice is in the bass? Unless one assumes all chords will be played in root position.
– Tim
5 hours ago
Ex.
Dm: i6 the chord is D minor and the third of the chord is the bass, the bass is F natural.– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
Ex.
Dm: i6 the chord is D minor and the third of the chord is the bass, the bass is F natural.– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
Maybe I misunderstand the question and the software only displays root position chords.
– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
Maybe I misunderstand the question and the software only displays root position chords.
– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago
add a comment |
The roman numerals say nothing about how you distribute the notes in the chord. The V chord contains the notes G, B and D, but you can play them anywhere.
If you play the chord so that all the notes are within one octave, this is known as 'close position'.
add a comment |
The roman numerals say nothing about how you distribute the notes in the chord. The V chord contains the notes G, B and D, but you can play them anywhere.
If you play the chord so that all the notes are within one octave, this is known as 'close position'.
add a comment |
The roman numerals say nothing about how you distribute the notes in the chord. The V chord contains the notes G, B and D, but you can play them anywhere.
If you play the chord so that all the notes are within one octave, this is known as 'close position'.
The roman numerals say nothing about how you distribute the notes in the chord. The V chord contains the notes G, B and D, but you can play them anywhere.
If you play the chord so that all the notes are within one octave, this is known as 'close position'.
answered 8 hours ago
PiedPiperPiedPiper
1,8956 silver badges18 bronze badges
1,8956 silver badges18 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87745%2fis-it-possible-to-know-the-exact-chord-from-the-roman-numerals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Does this software only do root position symbols without Arabic numerals - like
I- or does it also do Arabic numerals - likeI6orIV6/4?– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago