Is it possible to know the exact chord from the roman numeralsHow do I determine the chord progression Roman numerals?I am playing a song in D Major, and it contains an Am. How do I notate this in roman numerals?Roman numerals analysisCadences: Voicing and Roman numeralsChord progression, how to add the bass properlyHow to identify the chord progression and a specific chordUsing Roman Numeral Notation with Notes in the Bass (not figured bass)Are all modes relative to Ionian (major) in Roman numeral analysis?How to write Roman numeral figures for non-chord tones (NCT) and inversions, triads and seventh chords?Chord symbol and Roman numeral for naming an Augmented 6th chord

What is the farthest a camera can see?

A torrent of foreign terms

Escape Velocity - Won't the orbital path just become larger with higher initial velocity?

In which case does the Security misconfiguration vulnerability apply to?

What are those bumps on top of the Antonov-225?

Why does Japan use the same type of AC power outlet as the US?

Help, I cannot decide when to start the story

Is there a way to proportionalize fixed costs in a MILP?

Running code generated in realtime in JavaScript with eval()

Stephen King and steam/diesel/cyber-punk

Big number puzzle

Does an object storing more internal energy emit more thermal radiation?

Scam? Phone call from "Department of Social Security" asking me to call back

Causal Diagrams using Wolfram?

How can I find an old paper when the usual methods fail?

Doesn't the speed of light limit imply the same electron can be annihilated twice?

Would the USA be eligible to join the European Union?

Why is there a large performance impact when looping over an array over 240 elements?

Telephone number in spoken words

Lípínguapua dopo Pêpê

When did Bilbo and Frodo learn that Gandalf was a Maia?

Did Pope Urban II issue the papal bull "terra nullius" in 1095?

Should I leave building the database for the end?

How far did Gandalf and the Balrog drop from the bridge in Moria?



Is it possible to know the exact chord from the roman numerals


How do I determine the chord progression Roman numerals?I am playing a song in D Major, and it contains an Am. How do I notate this in roman numerals?Roman numerals analysisCadences: Voicing and Roman numeralsChord progression, how to add the bass properlyHow to identify the chord progression and a specific chordUsing Roman Numeral Notation with Notes in the Bass (not figured bass)Are all modes relative to Ionian (major) in Roman numeral analysis?How to write Roman numeral figures for non-chord tones (NCT) and inversions, triads and seventh chords?Chord symbol and Roman numeral for naming an Augmented 6th chord






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I was taking a look at this chord progression and attempted to play it just using the roman numerals.
enter image description here



Seeing the V(G) I played what would be the right most G in the image with the B and D above it so that all the notes are in one octave worth of the scale (Is there a better way to describe this?) but clicking on it shows the exact keys played are different.



Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D or is that information not part of the roman numerals above and simply a style choice / inconsequential.










share|improve this question
























  • Does this software only do root position symbols without Arabic numerals - like I - or does it also do Arabic numerals - like I6 or IV6/4?

    – Michael Curtis
    4 hours ago

















2















I was taking a look at this chord progression and attempted to play it just using the roman numerals.
enter image description here



Seeing the V(G) I played what would be the right most G in the image with the B and D above it so that all the notes are in one octave worth of the scale (Is there a better way to describe this?) but clicking on it shows the exact keys played are different.



Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D or is that information not part of the roman numerals above and simply a style choice / inconsequential.










share|improve this question
























  • Does this software only do root position symbols without Arabic numerals - like I - or does it also do Arabic numerals - like I6 or IV6/4?

    – Michael Curtis
    4 hours ago













2












2








2








I was taking a look at this chord progression and attempted to play it just using the roman numerals.
enter image description here



Seeing the V(G) I played what would be the right most G in the image with the B and D above it so that all the notes are in one octave worth of the scale (Is there a better way to describe this?) but clicking on it shows the exact keys played are different.



Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D or is that information not part of the roman numerals above and simply a style choice / inconsequential.










share|improve this question














I was taking a look at this chord progression and attempted to play it just using the roman numerals.
enter image description here



Seeing the V(G) I played what would be the right most G in the image with the B and D above it so that all the notes are in one octave worth of the scale (Is there a better way to describe this?) but clicking on it shows the exact keys played are different.



Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D or is that information not part of the roman numerals above and simply a style choice / inconsequential.







chord-progressions roman-numerals






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









QwertieQwertie

1655 bronze badges




1655 bronze badges















  • Does this software only do root position symbols without Arabic numerals - like I - or does it also do Arabic numerals - like I6 or IV6/4?

    – Michael Curtis
    4 hours ago

















  • Does this software only do root position symbols without Arabic numerals - like I - or does it also do Arabic numerals - like I6 or IV6/4?

    – Michael Curtis
    4 hours ago
















Does this software only do root position symbols without Arabic numerals - like I - or does it also do Arabic numerals - like I6 or IV6/4?

– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago





Does this software only do root position symbols without Arabic numerals - like I - or does it also do Arabic numerals - like I6 or IV6/4?

– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














Where you play the notes - in which ocatve, or even how they split - root in bass and others in r.h., or split them two with each, etc., is very much up to you, as the player. It's called voicing, and as PiedPiper says, when all the notes are as close as possible, it's called 'close position' or 'close voicing'. The opposite being 'open voicing'.



It matters not how many of each note gets played - and sometimes the 5 gets omitted, as the root gives the chord's name, and the 3 gives it its major or minor, an important fact when playing/naming chords. There really is no right or wrong with voicings. There is of course 'appropriate'!



With RN, it merely gives the number of the chord in that situation. There are so many different voicings available, it would be impossible to use a simple means to tell. Except, of course, writing the actual notes. But then that wouldn't be immediately transferrable to different keys.






share|improve this answer
































    3














    The only thing about the distribution of voices that Roman numeral analysis provides is which voice is in the bass.



    Just some background on the symbols...



    The Arabic numerals added to Roman numerals are a historical hold over from figured bass and an approach to harmony that was more about counterpoint. The figures told a keyboard accompanist what type of chord to use to harmonize a written bass part, but they were free to improvise the voicing and figuration of the chord. Most of the time there would be written melody parts as well. So in essence the Arabic numerals told the keyboard accompanist how to play harmonic filler with their right hand with no particular concern for the exact voicing or figuration of the chords.



    So there is a odd historic evolution of the chord symbols. Figured bass put numeric figures on a written bass part. Later in the Roman numeral analysis (RNA) system the figures were added to the Roman numerals - which give only a chord root - and the bass part is abstracted. Neither system gives specifics about the upper voices.




    EDIT



    After re-reading your question I'm confused about what exactly you are trying to figure out.




    Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D...




    In Roman numeral analysis (RNA), yes, you can indicate the G is above the B and D by using the 6 figure - like G: I6. But, properly speaking that I6 means the third of the chord is in the bass. It does not necessarily mean G is above the D. Listing tones from bass up to treble I6 can mean B G D or B D G.




    ...or is that information not part of the roman numerals above...




    It isn't clear if the screen shot you provided is of software that cannot display the Arabic figures on the Roman numerals




    ...or is that information... simply a style choice / inconsequential.




    I would say it is not inconsequential and important to style. Pop/rock style doesn't typically use RNA for chord symbols so it's a bit hard to explain. Pop/rock often uses chord names and 'slash notation' - like F/C to mean an F major chord over a C bass. In RNA it could be C: IV6/4.



    Pop/rock often uses chords in root position in which case the Arabic numeral figures would see inconsequential. Or, if the slash notation is used, some people aren't even aware of the concept of chord inversion.



    Nevertheless, chord inversion is important in rock music. In a progression that is supposed to be played with all root position chords, if the bass starts playing the thirds of the chords, it won't sound right. Regardless of the type of chord symbols used, any software's ability to display a chord symbol, or a musicians understanding of these things, the inversions are being used and they are an important aspect of any musical style.






    share|improve this answer



























    • RN tells what the chord name and function is. How does it tell which voice is in the bass? Unless one assumes all chords will be played in root position.

      – Tim
      5 hours ago












    • Ex. Dm: i6 the chord is D minor and the third of the chord is the bass, the bass is F natural.

      – Michael Curtis
      4 hours ago












    • Maybe I misunderstand the question and the software only displays root position chords.

      – Michael Curtis
      4 hours ago


















    2














    The roman numerals say nothing about how you distribute the notes in the chord. The V chord contains the notes G, B and D, but you can play them anywhere.

    If you play the chord so that all the notes are within one octave, this is known as 'close position'.






    share|improve this answer



























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "240"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87745%2fis-it-possible-to-know-the-exact-chord-from-the-roman-numerals%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4














      Where you play the notes - in which ocatve, or even how they split - root in bass and others in r.h., or split them two with each, etc., is very much up to you, as the player. It's called voicing, and as PiedPiper says, when all the notes are as close as possible, it's called 'close position' or 'close voicing'. The opposite being 'open voicing'.



      It matters not how many of each note gets played - and sometimes the 5 gets omitted, as the root gives the chord's name, and the 3 gives it its major or minor, an important fact when playing/naming chords. There really is no right or wrong with voicings. There is of course 'appropriate'!



      With RN, it merely gives the number of the chord in that situation. There are so many different voicings available, it would be impossible to use a simple means to tell. Except, of course, writing the actual notes. But then that wouldn't be immediately transferrable to different keys.






      share|improve this answer





























        4














        Where you play the notes - in which ocatve, or even how they split - root in bass and others in r.h., or split them two with each, etc., is very much up to you, as the player. It's called voicing, and as PiedPiper says, when all the notes are as close as possible, it's called 'close position' or 'close voicing'. The opposite being 'open voicing'.



        It matters not how many of each note gets played - and sometimes the 5 gets omitted, as the root gives the chord's name, and the 3 gives it its major or minor, an important fact when playing/naming chords. There really is no right or wrong with voicings. There is of course 'appropriate'!



        With RN, it merely gives the number of the chord in that situation. There are so many different voicings available, it would be impossible to use a simple means to tell. Except, of course, writing the actual notes. But then that wouldn't be immediately transferrable to different keys.






        share|improve this answer



























          4












          4








          4







          Where you play the notes - in which ocatve, or even how they split - root in bass and others in r.h., or split them two with each, etc., is very much up to you, as the player. It's called voicing, and as PiedPiper says, when all the notes are as close as possible, it's called 'close position' or 'close voicing'. The opposite being 'open voicing'.



          It matters not how many of each note gets played - and sometimes the 5 gets omitted, as the root gives the chord's name, and the 3 gives it its major or minor, an important fact when playing/naming chords. There really is no right or wrong with voicings. There is of course 'appropriate'!



          With RN, it merely gives the number of the chord in that situation. There are so many different voicings available, it would be impossible to use a simple means to tell. Except, of course, writing the actual notes. But then that wouldn't be immediately transferrable to different keys.






          share|improve this answer













          Where you play the notes - in which ocatve, or even how they split - root in bass and others in r.h., or split them two with each, etc., is very much up to you, as the player. It's called voicing, and as PiedPiper says, when all the notes are as close as possible, it's called 'close position' or 'close voicing'. The opposite being 'open voicing'.



          It matters not how many of each note gets played - and sometimes the 5 gets omitted, as the root gives the chord's name, and the 3 gives it its major or minor, an important fact when playing/naming chords. There really is no right or wrong with voicings. There is of course 'appropriate'!



          With RN, it merely gives the number of the chord in that situation. There are so many different voicings available, it would be impossible to use a simple means to tell. Except, of course, writing the actual notes. But then that wouldn't be immediately transferrable to different keys.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          TimTim

          112k11 gold badges110 silver badges283 bronze badges




          112k11 gold badges110 silver badges283 bronze badges


























              3














              The only thing about the distribution of voices that Roman numeral analysis provides is which voice is in the bass.



              Just some background on the symbols...



              The Arabic numerals added to Roman numerals are a historical hold over from figured bass and an approach to harmony that was more about counterpoint. The figures told a keyboard accompanist what type of chord to use to harmonize a written bass part, but they were free to improvise the voicing and figuration of the chord. Most of the time there would be written melody parts as well. So in essence the Arabic numerals told the keyboard accompanist how to play harmonic filler with their right hand with no particular concern for the exact voicing or figuration of the chords.



              So there is a odd historic evolution of the chord symbols. Figured bass put numeric figures on a written bass part. Later in the Roman numeral analysis (RNA) system the figures were added to the Roman numerals - which give only a chord root - and the bass part is abstracted. Neither system gives specifics about the upper voices.




              EDIT



              After re-reading your question I'm confused about what exactly you are trying to figure out.




              Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D...




              In Roman numeral analysis (RNA), yes, you can indicate the G is above the B and D by using the 6 figure - like G: I6. But, properly speaking that I6 means the third of the chord is in the bass. It does not necessarily mean G is above the D. Listing tones from bass up to treble I6 can mean B G D or B D G.




              ...or is that information not part of the roman numerals above...




              It isn't clear if the screen shot you provided is of software that cannot display the Arabic figures on the Roman numerals




              ...or is that information... simply a style choice / inconsequential.




              I would say it is not inconsequential and important to style. Pop/rock style doesn't typically use RNA for chord symbols so it's a bit hard to explain. Pop/rock often uses chord names and 'slash notation' - like F/C to mean an F major chord over a C bass. In RNA it could be C: IV6/4.



              Pop/rock often uses chords in root position in which case the Arabic numeral figures would see inconsequential. Or, if the slash notation is used, some people aren't even aware of the concept of chord inversion.



              Nevertheless, chord inversion is important in rock music. In a progression that is supposed to be played with all root position chords, if the bass starts playing the thirds of the chords, it won't sound right. Regardless of the type of chord symbols used, any software's ability to display a chord symbol, or a musicians understanding of these things, the inversions are being used and they are an important aspect of any musical style.






              share|improve this answer



























              • RN tells what the chord name and function is. How does it tell which voice is in the bass? Unless one assumes all chords will be played in root position.

                – Tim
                5 hours ago












              • Ex. Dm: i6 the chord is D minor and the third of the chord is the bass, the bass is F natural.

                – Michael Curtis
                4 hours ago












              • Maybe I misunderstand the question and the software only displays root position chords.

                – Michael Curtis
                4 hours ago















              3














              The only thing about the distribution of voices that Roman numeral analysis provides is which voice is in the bass.



              Just some background on the symbols...



              The Arabic numerals added to Roman numerals are a historical hold over from figured bass and an approach to harmony that was more about counterpoint. The figures told a keyboard accompanist what type of chord to use to harmonize a written bass part, but they were free to improvise the voicing and figuration of the chord. Most of the time there would be written melody parts as well. So in essence the Arabic numerals told the keyboard accompanist how to play harmonic filler with their right hand with no particular concern for the exact voicing or figuration of the chords.



              So there is a odd historic evolution of the chord symbols. Figured bass put numeric figures on a written bass part. Later in the Roman numeral analysis (RNA) system the figures were added to the Roman numerals - which give only a chord root - and the bass part is abstracted. Neither system gives specifics about the upper voices.




              EDIT



              After re-reading your question I'm confused about what exactly you are trying to figure out.




              Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D...




              In Roman numeral analysis (RNA), yes, you can indicate the G is above the B and D by using the 6 figure - like G: I6. But, properly speaking that I6 means the third of the chord is in the bass. It does not necessarily mean G is above the D. Listing tones from bass up to treble I6 can mean B G D or B D G.




              ...or is that information not part of the roman numerals above...




              It isn't clear if the screen shot you provided is of software that cannot display the Arabic figures on the Roman numerals




              ...or is that information... simply a style choice / inconsequential.




              I would say it is not inconsequential and important to style. Pop/rock style doesn't typically use RNA for chord symbols so it's a bit hard to explain. Pop/rock often uses chord names and 'slash notation' - like F/C to mean an F major chord over a C bass. In RNA it could be C: IV6/4.



              Pop/rock often uses chords in root position in which case the Arabic numeral figures would see inconsequential. Or, if the slash notation is used, some people aren't even aware of the concept of chord inversion.



              Nevertheless, chord inversion is important in rock music. In a progression that is supposed to be played with all root position chords, if the bass starts playing the thirds of the chords, it won't sound right. Regardless of the type of chord symbols used, any software's ability to display a chord symbol, or a musicians understanding of these things, the inversions are being used and they are an important aspect of any musical style.






              share|improve this answer



























              • RN tells what the chord name and function is. How does it tell which voice is in the bass? Unless one assumes all chords will be played in root position.

                – Tim
                5 hours ago












              • Ex. Dm: i6 the chord is D minor and the third of the chord is the bass, the bass is F natural.

                – Michael Curtis
                4 hours ago












              • Maybe I misunderstand the question and the software only displays root position chords.

                – Michael Curtis
                4 hours ago













              3












              3








              3







              The only thing about the distribution of voices that Roman numeral analysis provides is which voice is in the bass.



              Just some background on the symbols...



              The Arabic numerals added to Roman numerals are a historical hold over from figured bass and an approach to harmony that was more about counterpoint. The figures told a keyboard accompanist what type of chord to use to harmonize a written bass part, but they were free to improvise the voicing and figuration of the chord. Most of the time there would be written melody parts as well. So in essence the Arabic numerals told the keyboard accompanist how to play harmonic filler with their right hand with no particular concern for the exact voicing or figuration of the chords.



              So there is a odd historic evolution of the chord symbols. Figured bass put numeric figures on a written bass part. Later in the Roman numeral analysis (RNA) system the figures were added to the Roman numerals - which give only a chord root - and the bass part is abstracted. Neither system gives specifics about the upper voices.




              EDIT



              After re-reading your question I'm confused about what exactly you are trying to figure out.




              Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D...




              In Roman numeral analysis (RNA), yes, you can indicate the G is above the B and D by using the 6 figure - like G: I6. But, properly speaking that I6 means the third of the chord is in the bass. It does not necessarily mean G is above the D. Listing tones from bass up to treble I6 can mean B G D or B D G.




              ...or is that information not part of the roman numerals above...




              It isn't clear if the screen shot you provided is of software that cannot display the Arabic figures on the Roman numerals




              ...or is that information... simply a style choice / inconsequential.




              I would say it is not inconsequential and important to style. Pop/rock style doesn't typically use RNA for chord symbols so it's a bit hard to explain. Pop/rock often uses chord names and 'slash notation' - like F/C to mean an F major chord over a C bass. In RNA it could be C: IV6/4.



              Pop/rock often uses chords in root position in which case the Arabic numeral figures would see inconsequential. Or, if the slash notation is used, some people aren't even aware of the concept of chord inversion.



              Nevertheless, chord inversion is important in rock music. In a progression that is supposed to be played with all root position chords, if the bass starts playing the thirds of the chords, it won't sound right. Regardless of the type of chord symbols used, any software's ability to display a chord symbol, or a musicians understanding of these things, the inversions are being used and they are an important aspect of any musical style.






              share|improve this answer















              The only thing about the distribution of voices that Roman numeral analysis provides is which voice is in the bass.



              Just some background on the symbols...



              The Arabic numerals added to Roman numerals are a historical hold over from figured bass and an approach to harmony that was more about counterpoint. The figures told a keyboard accompanist what type of chord to use to harmonize a written bass part, but they were free to improvise the voicing and figuration of the chord. Most of the time there would be written melody parts as well. So in essence the Arabic numerals told the keyboard accompanist how to play harmonic filler with their right hand with no particular concern for the exact voicing or figuration of the chords.



              So there is a odd historic evolution of the chord symbols. Figured bass put numeric figures on a written bass part. Later in the Roman numeral analysis (RNA) system the figures were added to the Roman numerals - which give only a chord root - and the bass part is abstracted. Neither system gives specifics about the upper voices.




              EDIT



              After re-reading your question I'm confused about what exactly you are trying to figure out.




              Is there any possible way to have known that the G would be above the B and D...




              In Roman numeral analysis (RNA), yes, you can indicate the G is above the B and D by using the 6 figure - like G: I6. But, properly speaking that I6 means the third of the chord is in the bass. It does not necessarily mean G is above the D. Listing tones from bass up to treble I6 can mean B G D or B D G.




              ...or is that information not part of the roman numerals above...




              It isn't clear if the screen shot you provided is of software that cannot display the Arabic figures on the Roman numerals




              ...or is that information... simply a style choice / inconsequential.




              I would say it is not inconsequential and important to style. Pop/rock style doesn't typically use RNA for chord symbols so it's a bit hard to explain. Pop/rock often uses chord names and 'slash notation' - like F/C to mean an F major chord over a C bass. In RNA it could be C: IV6/4.



              Pop/rock often uses chords in root position in which case the Arabic numeral figures would see inconsequential. Or, if the slash notation is used, some people aren't even aware of the concept of chord inversion.



              Nevertheless, chord inversion is important in rock music. In a progression that is supposed to be played with all root position chords, if the bass starts playing the thirds of the chords, it won't sound right. Regardless of the type of chord symbols used, any software's ability to display a chord symbol, or a musicians understanding of these things, the inversions are being used and they are an important aspect of any musical style.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 4 hours ago

























              answered 5 hours ago









              Michael CurtisMichael Curtis

              17.4k12 silver badges58 bronze badges




              17.4k12 silver badges58 bronze badges















              • RN tells what the chord name and function is. How does it tell which voice is in the bass? Unless one assumes all chords will be played in root position.

                – Tim
                5 hours ago












              • Ex. Dm: i6 the chord is D minor and the third of the chord is the bass, the bass is F natural.

                – Michael Curtis
                4 hours ago












              • Maybe I misunderstand the question and the software only displays root position chords.

                – Michael Curtis
                4 hours ago

















              • RN tells what the chord name and function is. How does it tell which voice is in the bass? Unless one assumes all chords will be played in root position.

                – Tim
                5 hours ago












              • Ex. Dm: i6 the chord is D minor and the third of the chord is the bass, the bass is F natural.

                – Michael Curtis
                4 hours ago












              • Maybe I misunderstand the question and the software only displays root position chords.

                – Michael Curtis
                4 hours ago
















              RN tells what the chord name and function is. How does it tell which voice is in the bass? Unless one assumes all chords will be played in root position.

              – Tim
              5 hours ago






              RN tells what the chord name and function is. How does it tell which voice is in the bass? Unless one assumes all chords will be played in root position.

              – Tim
              5 hours ago














              Ex. Dm: i6 the chord is D minor and the third of the chord is the bass, the bass is F natural.

              – Michael Curtis
              4 hours ago






              Ex. Dm: i6 the chord is D minor and the third of the chord is the bass, the bass is F natural.

              – Michael Curtis
              4 hours ago














              Maybe I misunderstand the question and the software only displays root position chords.

              – Michael Curtis
              4 hours ago





              Maybe I misunderstand the question and the software only displays root position chords.

              – Michael Curtis
              4 hours ago











              2














              The roman numerals say nothing about how you distribute the notes in the chord. The V chord contains the notes G, B and D, but you can play them anywhere.

              If you play the chord so that all the notes are within one octave, this is known as 'close position'.






              share|improve this answer





























                2














                The roman numerals say nothing about how you distribute the notes in the chord. The V chord contains the notes G, B and D, but you can play them anywhere.

                If you play the chord so that all the notes are within one octave, this is known as 'close position'.






                share|improve this answer



























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  The roman numerals say nothing about how you distribute the notes in the chord. The V chord contains the notes G, B and D, but you can play them anywhere.

                  If you play the chord so that all the notes are within one octave, this is known as 'close position'.






                  share|improve this answer













                  The roman numerals say nothing about how you distribute the notes in the chord. The V chord contains the notes G, B and D, but you can play them anywhere.

                  If you play the chord so that all the notes are within one octave, this is known as 'close position'.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 8 hours ago









                  PiedPiperPiedPiper

                  1,8956 silver badges18 bronze badges




                  1,8956 silver badges18 bronze badges






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87745%2fis-it-possible-to-know-the-exact-chord-from-the-roman-numerals%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480