Misrepresentation on D160Visa refusal due to misrepresentationUK Visa Application for Thai CitizenWhat visitation limitations can come from a Canadian visiting the US for too long in the year?UK Standard Visitor Visa refusal due to funds parking and deception. What are my options?Why does my I-94 travel history not mention one of my travels by plane done less than five years ago?How to obtain a multiple-entry Schengen visa from the USA for a Russian citizen?UK tourist Visa RefusedMention half-brother on B1/B2 visa form, got rejectedDifferent travel dates in D-Tier 4 (General) Dep. Partner and D-Tier 4 (General) Dep Child VISAWhat are the Signs that I might get my Italian visa?Applying for UK Visit Visa
Why are sugars in whole fruits not digested the same way sugars in juice are?
How does Asimov's second law deal with contradictory orders from different people?
Accurately recalling the key - can everyone do it?
"Will flex for food". What does this phrase mean?
Word for giving preference to the oldest child
How do I solve such questions on paramagnetism and ferromagnetism?
Is Illustrator accurate for business card sizes?
What's the term for a group of people who enjoy literary works?
Backpacking with incontinence
Why is “deal 6 damage” a legit phrase?
What is the reason behind water not falling from a bucket at the top of loop?
Is there a general term for the items in a directory?
The grades of the students in a class
Should 2FA be enabled on service accounts?
Gold Battle KoTH
How to draw twisted cuves?
Why have both: BJT and FET transistors on IC output?
If a Shadow Magic sorcerer casts Darkness using the Eyes of the Dark feature, can they cast another spell that requires concentration?
Being told my "network" isn't PCI Complaint. I don't even have a server! Do I have to comply?
How to structure presentation to avoid getting questions that will be answered later in the presentation?
When did J.K. Rowling decide to make Ron and Hermione a couple?
Protect a 6 inch air hose from physical damage
Is it moral to remove/hide certain parts of a photo, as a photographer?
Why do we need a voltage divider when we get the same voltage at the output as the input?
Misrepresentation on D160
Visa refusal due to misrepresentationUK Visa Application for Thai CitizenWhat visitation limitations can come from a Canadian visiting the US for too long in the year?UK Standard Visitor Visa refusal due to funds parking and deception. What are my options?Why does my I-94 travel history not mention one of my travels by plane done less than five years ago?How to obtain a multiple-entry Schengen visa from the USA for a Russian citizen?UK tourist Visa RefusedMention half-brother on B1/B2 visa form, got rejectedDifferent travel dates in D-Tier 4 (General) Dep. Partner and D-Tier 4 (General) Dep Child VISAWhat are the Signs that I might get my Italian visa?Applying for UK Visit Visa
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I have applied for and obtained a visit visa to the US about 3 times. In those previous applications, I did not mention that my mom and half-sister were present in the US. The reason being that my mom was undocumented then. Now she has gained legal status. I'm wondering if changing this information,(i.e. acknowledging that both my sister and mom are resident in the US) on my D160 will cause a problem for me.
Do the visa interviewers check for discrepancies between old and new D160 forms?
visas usa
New contributor
ola is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
|
show 3 more comments
I have applied for and obtained a visit visa to the US about 3 times. In those previous applications, I did not mention that my mom and half-sister were present in the US. The reason being that my mom was undocumented then. Now she has gained legal status. I'm wondering if changing this information,(i.e. acknowledging that both my sister and mom are resident in the US) on my D160 will cause a problem for me.
Do the visa interviewers check for discrepancies between old and new D160 forms?
visas usa
New contributor
ola is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Omission (‘did not mention’) is still lying. See for example, this question travel.stackexchange.com/questions/126331/… and fraud and wilful misrepresentation uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-8-part-j-chapter-2 I wouldn’t count on getting another visa for the US any time soon.
– Traveller
7 hours ago
@Traveller omission is only lying if there is a question on the application that should normally elicit that information. Does the DS-160 have a question asking about relatives present in the US?
– phoog
7 hours ago
@Phoog Good point. My assumption was yes, since the OP is asking about changing the information previously provided. Happy to delete my comment if I’ve misunderstood the question
– Traveller
6 hours ago
@Traveller no, I don't think you've misunderstood. I also think there probably is a question asking about relatives in the US. But it's hard to give a good answer to this question without knowing for sure one way or the other.
– phoog
6 hours ago
2
Visa Traveller has a step by step guide to completing the DS160. Section 9 relates to family and specifically asks about parents and other relatives, including whether they are in the US. Most of the form is mandatory, so answering 'No' would be a lie.
– Redd Herring
5 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
I have applied for and obtained a visit visa to the US about 3 times. In those previous applications, I did not mention that my mom and half-sister were present in the US. The reason being that my mom was undocumented then. Now she has gained legal status. I'm wondering if changing this information,(i.e. acknowledging that both my sister and mom are resident in the US) on my D160 will cause a problem for me.
Do the visa interviewers check for discrepancies between old and new D160 forms?
visas usa
New contributor
ola is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I have applied for and obtained a visit visa to the US about 3 times. In those previous applications, I did not mention that my mom and half-sister were present in the US. The reason being that my mom was undocumented then. Now she has gained legal status. I'm wondering if changing this information,(i.e. acknowledging that both my sister and mom are resident in the US) on my D160 will cause a problem for me.
Do the visa interviewers check for discrepancies between old and new D160 forms?
visas usa
visas usa
New contributor
ola is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
ola is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
ola is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
olaola
261 bronze badge
261 bronze badge
New contributor
ola is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
ola is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Omission (‘did not mention’) is still lying. See for example, this question travel.stackexchange.com/questions/126331/… and fraud and wilful misrepresentation uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-8-part-j-chapter-2 I wouldn’t count on getting another visa for the US any time soon.
– Traveller
7 hours ago
@Traveller omission is only lying if there is a question on the application that should normally elicit that information. Does the DS-160 have a question asking about relatives present in the US?
– phoog
7 hours ago
@Phoog Good point. My assumption was yes, since the OP is asking about changing the information previously provided. Happy to delete my comment if I’ve misunderstood the question
– Traveller
6 hours ago
@Traveller no, I don't think you've misunderstood. I also think there probably is a question asking about relatives in the US. But it's hard to give a good answer to this question without knowing for sure one way or the other.
– phoog
6 hours ago
2
Visa Traveller has a step by step guide to completing the DS160. Section 9 relates to family and specifically asks about parents and other relatives, including whether they are in the US. Most of the form is mandatory, so answering 'No' would be a lie.
– Redd Herring
5 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Omission (‘did not mention’) is still lying. See for example, this question travel.stackexchange.com/questions/126331/… and fraud and wilful misrepresentation uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-8-part-j-chapter-2 I wouldn’t count on getting another visa for the US any time soon.
– Traveller
7 hours ago
@Traveller omission is only lying if there is a question on the application that should normally elicit that information. Does the DS-160 have a question asking about relatives present in the US?
– phoog
7 hours ago
@Phoog Good point. My assumption was yes, since the OP is asking about changing the information previously provided. Happy to delete my comment if I’ve misunderstood the question
– Traveller
6 hours ago
@Traveller no, I don't think you've misunderstood. I also think there probably is a question asking about relatives in the US. But it's hard to give a good answer to this question without knowing for sure one way or the other.
– phoog
6 hours ago
2
Visa Traveller has a step by step guide to completing the DS160. Section 9 relates to family and specifically asks about parents and other relatives, including whether they are in the US. Most of the form is mandatory, so answering 'No' would be a lie.
– Redd Herring
5 hours ago
Omission (‘did not mention’) is still lying. See for example, this question travel.stackexchange.com/questions/126331/… and fraud and wilful misrepresentation uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-8-part-j-chapter-2 I wouldn’t count on getting another visa for the US any time soon.
– Traveller
7 hours ago
Omission (‘did not mention’) is still lying. See for example, this question travel.stackexchange.com/questions/126331/… and fraud and wilful misrepresentation uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-8-part-j-chapter-2 I wouldn’t count on getting another visa for the US any time soon.
– Traveller
7 hours ago
@Traveller omission is only lying if there is a question on the application that should normally elicit that information. Does the DS-160 have a question asking about relatives present in the US?
– phoog
7 hours ago
@Traveller omission is only lying if there is a question on the application that should normally elicit that information. Does the DS-160 have a question asking about relatives present in the US?
– phoog
7 hours ago
@Phoog Good point. My assumption was yes, since the OP is asking about changing the information previously provided. Happy to delete my comment if I’ve misunderstood the question
– Traveller
6 hours ago
@Phoog Good point. My assumption was yes, since the OP is asking about changing the information previously provided. Happy to delete my comment if I’ve misunderstood the question
– Traveller
6 hours ago
@Traveller no, I don't think you've misunderstood. I also think there probably is a question asking about relatives in the US. But it's hard to give a good answer to this question without knowing for sure one way or the other.
– phoog
6 hours ago
@Traveller no, I don't think you've misunderstood. I also think there probably is a question asking about relatives in the US. But it's hard to give a good answer to this question without knowing for sure one way or the other.
– phoog
6 hours ago
2
2
Visa Traveller has a step by step guide to completing the DS160. Section 9 relates to family and specifically asks about parents and other relatives, including whether they are in the US. Most of the form is mandatory, so answering 'No' would be a lie.
– Redd Herring
5 hours ago
Visa Traveller has a step by step guide to completing the DS160. Section 9 relates to family and specifically asks about parents and other relatives, including whether they are in the US. Most of the form is mandatory, so answering 'No' would be a lie.
– Redd Herring
5 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There are two issues here. The first is very serious for you, and the second may be even more serious for your mother.
First: In your prior visa applications, you answered "no" to the DS-160 question about your mother being in the US, while the truth was that the answer was actually "yes." The US State Department will have your prior visa applications, and will see that your answers are different. They will also easily see that your mother is now a legal resident in the US, and because of her recent status acquisition date will know that she may have been in the US when you said she was not. Your earlier answers will therefore be seen as a misrepresentation by you, and as Traveller observes, you're very likely not to receive a visa. I'd expect you'd earn a long ban as well.
Second: Because the State Department will see that your mother might have been in the US when you said she wasn't, the State Department may look more closely at her. They'd be interested in whether she made misrepresentations in her status paperwork and application documents. If she did, and they can show she did, her US resident status could be at risk.
Thus: your application for a US visa could have very high stakes for both you and your mother...particularly for her. For these reasons, do not file an application for a US visa until you have had a consultation with a US attorney who is experienced in US immigration matters.
After you've had that consultation, follow the lawyer's advice.
This is probably the right advice but the OP does not say that their mother is now a US citizen, just that she has gained legal status.
– ajd
4 hours ago
Thanks for the correction. I'll amend the answer. But the reasoning remains valid.
– David
4 hours ago
While consulting with a lawyer is a good idea, I would bet but obviously can't prove noone cares. Sure in the past OP didn't have family in the US, now they do, happens all the time, noone will dig it up. It's just a flag for having a weaker application because remember the presumption on their end is the visa applicant wanting to (illegally) immigrate and their job is to read tea leaves and decide whether they want to or not. If they have family, they are more likely to want to and that's it.
– chx
3 hours ago
@David The OP seems to have got themselves between a rock and a hard place - continue with the lie (possibly forever) and hope not to be found out each and every time they apply - it’s worked three times up to now, after all - or disclose the existence of family in the US next time/at some point in the future and almost certainly get a lengthy entry ban. I am absolutely not advocating the first option but is there any realistic hope that an Immigration lawyer could help? Or is it a waste of time and money?
– Traveller
3 hours ago
I can't dispute your comments: you may well be right that they won't look, and that there's no fix. In this case, however, filing another DS-160 could conceivably have serious consequences for someone other than the OP. I wanted to present that possibility to the OP.
– David
36 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "273"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
ola is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143202%2fmisrepresentation-on-d160%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There are two issues here. The first is very serious for you, and the second may be even more serious for your mother.
First: In your prior visa applications, you answered "no" to the DS-160 question about your mother being in the US, while the truth was that the answer was actually "yes." The US State Department will have your prior visa applications, and will see that your answers are different. They will also easily see that your mother is now a legal resident in the US, and because of her recent status acquisition date will know that she may have been in the US when you said she was not. Your earlier answers will therefore be seen as a misrepresentation by you, and as Traveller observes, you're very likely not to receive a visa. I'd expect you'd earn a long ban as well.
Second: Because the State Department will see that your mother might have been in the US when you said she wasn't, the State Department may look more closely at her. They'd be interested in whether she made misrepresentations in her status paperwork and application documents. If she did, and they can show she did, her US resident status could be at risk.
Thus: your application for a US visa could have very high stakes for both you and your mother...particularly for her. For these reasons, do not file an application for a US visa until you have had a consultation with a US attorney who is experienced in US immigration matters.
After you've had that consultation, follow the lawyer's advice.
This is probably the right advice but the OP does not say that their mother is now a US citizen, just that she has gained legal status.
– ajd
4 hours ago
Thanks for the correction. I'll amend the answer. But the reasoning remains valid.
– David
4 hours ago
While consulting with a lawyer is a good idea, I would bet but obviously can't prove noone cares. Sure in the past OP didn't have family in the US, now they do, happens all the time, noone will dig it up. It's just a flag for having a weaker application because remember the presumption on their end is the visa applicant wanting to (illegally) immigrate and their job is to read tea leaves and decide whether they want to or not. If they have family, they are more likely to want to and that's it.
– chx
3 hours ago
@David The OP seems to have got themselves between a rock and a hard place - continue with the lie (possibly forever) and hope not to be found out each and every time they apply - it’s worked three times up to now, after all - or disclose the existence of family in the US next time/at some point in the future and almost certainly get a lengthy entry ban. I am absolutely not advocating the first option but is there any realistic hope that an Immigration lawyer could help? Or is it a waste of time and money?
– Traveller
3 hours ago
I can't dispute your comments: you may well be right that they won't look, and that there's no fix. In this case, however, filing another DS-160 could conceivably have serious consequences for someone other than the OP. I wanted to present that possibility to the OP.
– David
36 mins ago
add a comment |
There are two issues here. The first is very serious for you, and the second may be even more serious for your mother.
First: In your prior visa applications, you answered "no" to the DS-160 question about your mother being in the US, while the truth was that the answer was actually "yes." The US State Department will have your prior visa applications, and will see that your answers are different. They will also easily see that your mother is now a legal resident in the US, and because of her recent status acquisition date will know that she may have been in the US when you said she was not. Your earlier answers will therefore be seen as a misrepresentation by you, and as Traveller observes, you're very likely not to receive a visa. I'd expect you'd earn a long ban as well.
Second: Because the State Department will see that your mother might have been in the US when you said she wasn't, the State Department may look more closely at her. They'd be interested in whether she made misrepresentations in her status paperwork and application documents. If she did, and they can show she did, her US resident status could be at risk.
Thus: your application for a US visa could have very high stakes for both you and your mother...particularly for her. For these reasons, do not file an application for a US visa until you have had a consultation with a US attorney who is experienced in US immigration matters.
After you've had that consultation, follow the lawyer's advice.
This is probably the right advice but the OP does not say that their mother is now a US citizen, just that she has gained legal status.
– ajd
4 hours ago
Thanks for the correction. I'll amend the answer. But the reasoning remains valid.
– David
4 hours ago
While consulting with a lawyer is a good idea, I would bet but obviously can't prove noone cares. Sure in the past OP didn't have family in the US, now they do, happens all the time, noone will dig it up. It's just a flag for having a weaker application because remember the presumption on their end is the visa applicant wanting to (illegally) immigrate and their job is to read tea leaves and decide whether they want to or not. If they have family, they are more likely to want to and that's it.
– chx
3 hours ago
@David The OP seems to have got themselves between a rock and a hard place - continue with the lie (possibly forever) and hope not to be found out each and every time they apply - it’s worked three times up to now, after all - or disclose the existence of family in the US next time/at some point in the future and almost certainly get a lengthy entry ban. I am absolutely not advocating the first option but is there any realistic hope that an Immigration lawyer could help? Or is it a waste of time and money?
– Traveller
3 hours ago
I can't dispute your comments: you may well be right that they won't look, and that there's no fix. In this case, however, filing another DS-160 could conceivably have serious consequences for someone other than the OP. I wanted to present that possibility to the OP.
– David
36 mins ago
add a comment |
There are two issues here. The first is very serious for you, and the second may be even more serious for your mother.
First: In your prior visa applications, you answered "no" to the DS-160 question about your mother being in the US, while the truth was that the answer was actually "yes." The US State Department will have your prior visa applications, and will see that your answers are different. They will also easily see that your mother is now a legal resident in the US, and because of her recent status acquisition date will know that she may have been in the US when you said she was not. Your earlier answers will therefore be seen as a misrepresentation by you, and as Traveller observes, you're very likely not to receive a visa. I'd expect you'd earn a long ban as well.
Second: Because the State Department will see that your mother might have been in the US when you said she wasn't, the State Department may look more closely at her. They'd be interested in whether she made misrepresentations in her status paperwork and application documents. If she did, and they can show she did, her US resident status could be at risk.
Thus: your application for a US visa could have very high stakes for both you and your mother...particularly for her. For these reasons, do not file an application for a US visa until you have had a consultation with a US attorney who is experienced in US immigration matters.
After you've had that consultation, follow the lawyer's advice.
There are two issues here. The first is very serious for you, and the second may be even more serious for your mother.
First: In your prior visa applications, you answered "no" to the DS-160 question about your mother being in the US, while the truth was that the answer was actually "yes." The US State Department will have your prior visa applications, and will see that your answers are different. They will also easily see that your mother is now a legal resident in the US, and because of her recent status acquisition date will know that she may have been in the US when you said she was not. Your earlier answers will therefore be seen as a misrepresentation by you, and as Traveller observes, you're very likely not to receive a visa. I'd expect you'd earn a long ban as well.
Second: Because the State Department will see that your mother might have been in the US when you said she wasn't, the State Department may look more closely at her. They'd be interested in whether she made misrepresentations in her status paperwork and application documents. If she did, and they can show she did, her US resident status could be at risk.
Thus: your application for a US visa could have very high stakes for both you and your mother...particularly for her. For these reasons, do not file an application for a US visa until you have had a consultation with a US attorney who is experienced in US immigration matters.
After you've had that consultation, follow the lawyer's advice.
edited 34 mins ago
answered 4 hours ago
DavidDavid
4,7872 gold badges11 silver badges27 bronze badges
4,7872 gold badges11 silver badges27 bronze badges
This is probably the right advice but the OP does not say that their mother is now a US citizen, just that she has gained legal status.
– ajd
4 hours ago
Thanks for the correction. I'll amend the answer. But the reasoning remains valid.
– David
4 hours ago
While consulting with a lawyer is a good idea, I would bet but obviously can't prove noone cares. Sure in the past OP didn't have family in the US, now they do, happens all the time, noone will dig it up. It's just a flag for having a weaker application because remember the presumption on their end is the visa applicant wanting to (illegally) immigrate and their job is to read tea leaves and decide whether they want to or not. If they have family, they are more likely to want to and that's it.
– chx
3 hours ago
@David The OP seems to have got themselves between a rock and a hard place - continue with the lie (possibly forever) and hope not to be found out each and every time they apply - it’s worked three times up to now, after all - or disclose the existence of family in the US next time/at some point in the future and almost certainly get a lengthy entry ban. I am absolutely not advocating the first option but is there any realistic hope that an Immigration lawyer could help? Or is it a waste of time and money?
– Traveller
3 hours ago
I can't dispute your comments: you may well be right that they won't look, and that there's no fix. In this case, however, filing another DS-160 could conceivably have serious consequences for someone other than the OP. I wanted to present that possibility to the OP.
– David
36 mins ago
add a comment |
This is probably the right advice but the OP does not say that their mother is now a US citizen, just that she has gained legal status.
– ajd
4 hours ago
Thanks for the correction. I'll amend the answer. But the reasoning remains valid.
– David
4 hours ago
While consulting with a lawyer is a good idea, I would bet but obviously can't prove noone cares. Sure in the past OP didn't have family in the US, now they do, happens all the time, noone will dig it up. It's just a flag for having a weaker application because remember the presumption on their end is the visa applicant wanting to (illegally) immigrate and their job is to read tea leaves and decide whether they want to or not. If they have family, they are more likely to want to and that's it.
– chx
3 hours ago
@David The OP seems to have got themselves between a rock and a hard place - continue with the lie (possibly forever) and hope not to be found out each and every time they apply - it’s worked three times up to now, after all - or disclose the existence of family in the US next time/at some point in the future and almost certainly get a lengthy entry ban. I am absolutely not advocating the first option but is there any realistic hope that an Immigration lawyer could help? Or is it a waste of time and money?
– Traveller
3 hours ago
I can't dispute your comments: you may well be right that they won't look, and that there's no fix. In this case, however, filing another DS-160 could conceivably have serious consequences for someone other than the OP. I wanted to present that possibility to the OP.
– David
36 mins ago
This is probably the right advice but the OP does not say that their mother is now a US citizen, just that she has gained legal status.
– ajd
4 hours ago
This is probably the right advice but the OP does not say that their mother is now a US citizen, just that she has gained legal status.
– ajd
4 hours ago
Thanks for the correction. I'll amend the answer. But the reasoning remains valid.
– David
4 hours ago
Thanks for the correction. I'll amend the answer. But the reasoning remains valid.
– David
4 hours ago
While consulting with a lawyer is a good idea, I would bet but obviously can't prove noone cares. Sure in the past OP didn't have family in the US, now they do, happens all the time, noone will dig it up. It's just a flag for having a weaker application because remember the presumption on their end is the visa applicant wanting to (illegally) immigrate and their job is to read tea leaves and decide whether they want to or not. If they have family, they are more likely to want to and that's it.
– chx
3 hours ago
While consulting with a lawyer is a good idea, I would bet but obviously can't prove noone cares. Sure in the past OP didn't have family in the US, now they do, happens all the time, noone will dig it up. It's just a flag for having a weaker application because remember the presumption on their end is the visa applicant wanting to (illegally) immigrate and their job is to read tea leaves and decide whether they want to or not. If they have family, they are more likely to want to and that's it.
– chx
3 hours ago
@David The OP seems to have got themselves between a rock and a hard place - continue with the lie (possibly forever) and hope not to be found out each and every time they apply - it’s worked three times up to now, after all - or disclose the existence of family in the US next time/at some point in the future and almost certainly get a lengthy entry ban. I am absolutely not advocating the first option but is there any realistic hope that an Immigration lawyer could help? Or is it a waste of time and money?
– Traveller
3 hours ago
@David The OP seems to have got themselves between a rock and a hard place - continue with the lie (possibly forever) and hope not to be found out each and every time they apply - it’s worked three times up to now, after all - or disclose the existence of family in the US next time/at some point in the future and almost certainly get a lengthy entry ban. I am absolutely not advocating the first option but is there any realistic hope that an Immigration lawyer could help? Or is it a waste of time and money?
– Traveller
3 hours ago
I can't dispute your comments: you may well be right that they won't look, and that there's no fix. In this case, however, filing another DS-160 could conceivably have serious consequences for someone other than the OP. I wanted to present that possibility to the OP.
– David
36 mins ago
I can't dispute your comments: you may well be right that they won't look, and that there's no fix. In this case, however, filing another DS-160 could conceivably have serious consequences for someone other than the OP. I wanted to present that possibility to the OP.
– David
36 mins ago
add a comment |
ola is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
ola is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
ola is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
ola is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143202%2fmisrepresentation-on-d160%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Omission (‘did not mention’) is still lying. See for example, this question travel.stackexchange.com/questions/126331/… and fraud and wilful misrepresentation uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-8-part-j-chapter-2 I wouldn’t count on getting another visa for the US any time soon.
– Traveller
7 hours ago
@Traveller omission is only lying if there is a question on the application that should normally elicit that information. Does the DS-160 have a question asking about relatives present in the US?
– phoog
7 hours ago
@Phoog Good point. My assumption was yes, since the OP is asking about changing the information previously provided. Happy to delete my comment if I’ve misunderstood the question
– Traveller
6 hours ago
@Traveller no, I don't think you've misunderstood. I also think there probably is a question asking about relatives in the US. But it's hard to give a good answer to this question without knowing for sure one way or the other.
– phoog
6 hours ago
2
Visa Traveller has a step by step guide to completing the DS160. Section 9 relates to family and specifically asks about parents and other relatives, including whether they are in the US. Most of the form is mandatory, so answering 'No' would be a lie.
– Redd Herring
5 hours ago