Can't understand an ACT practice problem: Triangle appears to be isosceles, why isn't the answer 7.3~ here?Calculate depth using triginometrySine Law Homework QuestionIs it possible to solve for the unknown sides and angles in the top triangle?How can $sin(pi)$ = 0 without breaking a bunch of math rules?Are all triangles isosceles?Problem on Trigonometry and Similar trianglesArea of a regular hexagon via area of trianglesUsing the Law of Cosines results in an “invalid” answer, why?Altitude of a Triangle: Showing indeed perpendicularSo, I just learned about the “ambiguous” case of the law of sines.
Is the EU really banning "toxic propellants" in 2020? How is that going to work?
Could flaps be raised upward to serve as spoilers / lift dumpers?
The grades of the students in a class
What is Albrecht Dürer's Perspective Machine drawing style?
How do I respond appropriately to an overseas company that obtained a visa for me without hiring me?
How do I solve such questions on paramagnetism and ferromagnetism?
What's the proper way of indicating that a car has reached its destination during a dialogue?
Why interlaced CRT scanning wasn't done back and forth?
Is verification of a blockchain computationally cheaper than recreating it?
"Will flex for food". What does this phrase mean?
cannot trash malware NGPlayerSetup.dmg
Will medical institutions reject an applicant based on being 28 years of age?
Why did the United States not resort to nuclear weapons in Vietnam?
Went to a big 4 but got fired for underperformance in a year recently - Now every one thinks I'm pro - How to balance expectations?
Word to describe someone doing something even though told not to
How to trick a fairly simplistic kill-counter?
Can birds evolve without trees?
Can an alphabet for a Turing machine contain subsets of other alphabets?
Declaring a visitor to the UK as my "girlfriend" - effect on getting a Visitor visa?
Map vs. Table for index-specific operations on 2D arrays
Why do player start with fighting for the corners in go?
Skipping same old introductions
How to avoid a lengthy conversation with someone from the neighborhood I don't share interests with
Heinlein story regarding suspended animation and reading newspapers?
Can't understand an ACT practice problem: Triangle appears to be isosceles, why isn't the answer 7.3~ here?
Calculate depth using triginometrySine Law Homework QuestionIs it possible to solve for the unknown sides and angles in the top triangle?How can $sin(pi)$ = 0 without breaking a bunch of math rules?Are all triangles isosceles?Problem on Trigonometry and Similar trianglesArea of a regular hexagon via area of trianglesUsing the Law of Cosines results in an “invalid” answer, why?Altitude of a Triangle: Showing indeed perpendicularSo, I just learned about the “ambiguous” case of the law of sines.
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
In the following picture, XY = YZ. The angle a = 40 degrees, and the length opposite is 5.
The problem asks to compute XY
We immediately dropped the dotted perpendicular and get two right triangles.
The length of the bottom is 2.5 in each right triangle, and therefore
$a/2 = 20^circ$
$sin 20 = 2.5 / XY$ or, $XY = 2.5 / sin 20 approx 7.3$
Their answer uses $5 / a = XY / 70$
$5 / 40 = XY / 70$
$XY = 350/40 = 8.75$
I would have thought both these answers should be the same, where did we go wrong?
geometry trigonometry fake-proofs
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the following picture, XY = YZ. The angle a = 40 degrees, and the length opposite is 5.
The problem asks to compute XY
We immediately dropped the dotted perpendicular and get two right triangles.
The length of the bottom is 2.5 in each right triangle, and therefore
$a/2 = 20^circ$
$sin 20 = 2.5 / XY$ or, $XY = 2.5 / sin 20 approx 7.3$
Their answer uses $5 / a = XY / 70$
$5 / 40 = XY / 70$
$XY = 350/40 = 8.75$
I would have thought both these answers should be the same, where did we go wrong?
geometry trigonometry fake-proofs
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Get another book. NOW! The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XY70$ is ... baseless. It seems like they want to use the law of sins that says $frac 5sin a = frac xysin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as yours.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Their statement $5/40=XY/70$ is unjustified and wrong.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Which book is this? I have an ACT book and I want to make sure it's not the same one?
$endgroup$
– Gnumbertester
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
The book is probably going for the law of sines that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. But that the book would make such a typo and then actually calculate based on that typo does not speak well for the text. The OP was correct and the book was dead wrong.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the following picture, XY = YZ. The angle a = 40 degrees, and the length opposite is 5.
The problem asks to compute XY
We immediately dropped the dotted perpendicular and get two right triangles.
The length of the bottom is 2.5 in each right triangle, and therefore
$a/2 = 20^circ$
$sin 20 = 2.5 / XY$ or, $XY = 2.5 / sin 20 approx 7.3$
Their answer uses $5 / a = XY / 70$
$5 / 40 = XY / 70$
$XY = 350/40 = 8.75$
I would have thought both these answers should be the same, where did we go wrong?
geometry trigonometry fake-proofs
$endgroup$
In the following picture, XY = YZ. The angle a = 40 degrees, and the length opposite is 5.
The problem asks to compute XY
We immediately dropped the dotted perpendicular and get two right triangles.
The length of the bottom is 2.5 in each right triangle, and therefore
$a/2 = 20^circ$
$sin 20 = 2.5 / XY$ or, $XY = 2.5 / sin 20 approx 7.3$
Their answer uses $5 / a = XY / 70$
$5 / 40 = XY / 70$
$XY = 350/40 = 8.75$
I would have thought both these answers should be the same, where did we go wrong?
geometry trigonometry fake-proofs
geometry trigonometry fake-proofs
edited 1 hour ago
N. Bar
6091 silver badge17 bronze badges
6091 silver badge17 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
DovDov
1728 bronze badges
1728 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Get another book. NOW! The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XY70$ is ... baseless. It seems like they want to use the law of sins that says $frac 5sin a = frac xysin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as yours.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Their statement $5/40=XY/70$ is unjustified and wrong.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Which book is this? I have an ACT book and I want to make sure it's not the same one?
$endgroup$
– Gnumbertester
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
The book is probably going for the law of sines that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. But that the book would make such a typo and then actually calculate based on that typo does not speak well for the text. The OP was correct and the book was dead wrong.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Get another book. NOW! The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XY70$ is ... baseless. It seems like they want to use the law of sins that says $frac 5sin a = frac xysin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as yours.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Their statement $5/40=XY/70$ is unjustified and wrong.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Which book is this? I have an ACT book and I want to make sure it's not the same one?
$endgroup$
– Gnumbertester
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
The book is probably going for the law of sines that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. But that the book would make such a typo and then actually calculate based on that typo does not speak well for the text. The OP was correct and the book was dead wrong.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Get another book. NOW! The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XY70$ is ... baseless. It seems like they want to use the law of sins that says $frac 5sin a = frac xysin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as yours.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Get another book. NOW! The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XY70$ is ... baseless. It seems like they want to use the law of sins that says $frac 5sin a = frac xysin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as yours.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Their statement $5/40=XY/70$ is unjustified and wrong.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Their statement $5/40=XY/70$ is unjustified and wrong.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Which book is this? I have an ACT book and I want to make sure it's not the same one?
$endgroup$
– Gnumbertester
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Which book is this? I have an ACT book and I want to make sure it's not the same one?
$endgroup$
– Gnumbertester
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
The book is probably going for the law of sines that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. But that the book would make such a typo and then actually calculate based on that typo does not speak well for the text. The OP was correct and the book was dead wrong.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
The book is probably going for the law of sines that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. But that the book would make such a typo and then actually calculate based on that typo does not speak well for the text. The OP was correct and the book was dead wrong.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Get another book.
NOW!
The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XYangle 70$ is ... baseless.
There's no such similarity between triangle sides and the direct measure of angles. It's .... stupid... to think there would be.
But there is a similarity between sides and the SINES of angles.
I.e. The law of sines which would allow us to note:
that $frac 5sin a = frac XYsin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as your answer.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! I thought I was losing my mind. Now I know that's true, but at least you showed us what was going on. And my son can go on to other problems.
$endgroup$
– Dov
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I might be being a little harsh on the book. But the book made a typo of $frac 540 = frac xy70$ instead of $frac 5sin 40=frac xysin 70$. That's bad, but... we all make errors. But then the book made a miscalculation based on the typo. That's .... worse. I'm not sure how condemning I should be but that's the thing that should be caught. ... anyway the harm such an error can make in the utter confusion and errors it would cause and teach the students reading it is ... tragic.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$XY=frac2.5sin20^circ=7.3095...$$
Another way:
$$fracXYsin70^circ=frac5sin40^circ,$$ which gives the same result:
$$XY=frac5sin70^circsin40^circ=7.3095...$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
which is wrong according to the answer... The other way of computing it using law of signs gets us 8.75, what's going on?
$endgroup$
– Dov
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Dov I added something. See now.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Dov: In the second approach, you've left off the sines in using the law of sines. (Which I now see that Rozenberg included in his answer as I was writing my comment.)
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's the law of "sines" not "signs". So it would state that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. To misquote it, as the book did, as $frac 540 = frac XY70$ is just plain wrong as $x ne sin x$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3312660%2fcant-understand-an-act-practice-problem-triangle-appears-to-be-isosceles-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Get another book.
NOW!
The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XYangle 70$ is ... baseless.
There's no such similarity between triangle sides and the direct measure of angles. It's .... stupid... to think there would be.
But there is a similarity between sides and the SINES of angles.
I.e. The law of sines which would allow us to note:
that $frac 5sin a = frac XYsin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as your answer.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! I thought I was losing my mind. Now I know that's true, but at least you showed us what was going on. And my son can go on to other problems.
$endgroup$
– Dov
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I might be being a little harsh on the book. But the book made a typo of $frac 540 = frac xy70$ instead of $frac 5sin 40=frac xysin 70$. That's bad, but... we all make errors. But then the book made a miscalculation based on the typo. That's .... worse. I'm not sure how condemning I should be but that's the thing that should be caught. ... anyway the harm such an error can make in the utter confusion and errors it would cause and teach the students reading it is ... tragic.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Get another book.
NOW!
The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XYangle 70$ is ... baseless.
There's no such similarity between triangle sides and the direct measure of angles. It's .... stupid... to think there would be.
But there is a similarity between sides and the SINES of angles.
I.e. The law of sines which would allow us to note:
that $frac 5sin a = frac XYsin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as your answer.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! I thought I was losing my mind. Now I know that's true, but at least you showed us what was going on. And my son can go on to other problems.
$endgroup$
– Dov
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I might be being a little harsh on the book. But the book made a typo of $frac 540 = frac xy70$ instead of $frac 5sin 40=frac xysin 70$. That's bad, but... we all make errors. But then the book made a miscalculation based on the typo. That's .... worse. I'm not sure how condemning I should be but that's the thing that should be caught. ... anyway the harm such an error can make in the utter confusion and errors it would cause and teach the students reading it is ... tragic.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Get another book.
NOW!
The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XYangle 70$ is ... baseless.
There's no such similarity between triangle sides and the direct measure of angles. It's .... stupid... to think there would be.
But there is a similarity between sides and the SINES of angles.
I.e. The law of sines which would allow us to note:
that $frac 5sin a = frac XYsin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as your answer.
$endgroup$
Get another book.
NOW!
The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XYangle 70$ is ... baseless.
There's no such similarity between triangle sides and the direct measure of angles. It's .... stupid... to think there would be.
But there is a similarity between sides and the SINES of angles.
I.e. The law of sines which would allow us to note:
that $frac 5sin a = frac XYsin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as your answer.
answered 7 hours ago
fleabloodfleablood
77.5k2 gold badges28 silver badges95 bronze badges
77.5k2 gold badges28 silver badges95 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Thanks! I thought I was losing my mind. Now I know that's true, but at least you showed us what was going on. And my son can go on to other problems.
$endgroup$
– Dov
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I might be being a little harsh on the book. But the book made a typo of $frac 540 = frac xy70$ instead of $frac 5sin 40=frac xysin 70$. That's bad, but... we all make errors. But then the book made a miscalculation based on the typo. That's .... worse. I'm not sure how condemning I should be but that's the thing that should be caught. ... anyway the harm such an error can make in the utter confusion and errors it would cause and teach the students reading it is ... tragic.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks! I thought I was losing my mind. Now I know that's true, but at least you showed us what was going on. And my son can go on to other problems.
$endgroup$
– Dov
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I might be being a little harsh on the book. But the book made a typo of $frac 540 = frac xy70$ instead of $frac 5sin 40=frac xysin 70$. That's bad, but... we all make errors. But then the book made a miscalculation based on the typo. That's .... worse. I'm not sure how condemning I should be but that's the thing that should be caught. ... anyway the harm such an error can make in the utter confusion and errors it would cause and teach the students reading it is ... tragic.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks! I thought I was losing my mind. Now I know that's true, but at least you showed us what was going on. And my son can go on to other problems.
$endgroup$
– Dov
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks! I thought I was losing my mind. Now I know that's true, but at least you showed us what was going on. And my son can go on to other problems.
$endgroup$
– Dov
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I might be being a little harsh on the book. But the book made a typo of $frac 540 = frac xy70$ instead of $frac 5sin 40=frac xysin 70$. That's bad, but... we all make errors. But then the book made a miscalculation based on the typo. That's .... worse. I'm not sure how condemning I should be but that's the thing that should be caught. ... anyway the harm such an error can make in the utter confusion and errors it would cause and teach the students reading it is ... tragic.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I might be being a little harsh on the book. But the book made a typo of $frac 540 = frac xy70$ instead of $frac 5sin 40=frac xysin 70$. That's bad, but... we all make errors. But then the book made a miscalculation based on the typo. That's .... worse. I'm not sure how condemning I should be but that's the thing that should be caught. ... anyway the harm such an error can make in the utter confusion and errors it would cause and teach the students reading it is ... tragic.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$XY=frac2.5sin20^circ=7.3095...$$
Another way:
$$fracXYsin70^circ=frac5sin40^circ,$$ which gives the same result:
$$XY=frac5sin70^circsin40^circ=7.3095...$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
which is wrong according to the answer... The other way of computing it using law of signs gets us 8.75, what's going on?
$endgroup$
– Dov
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Dov I added something. See now.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Dov: In the second approach, you've left off the sines in using the law of sines. (Which I now see that Rozenberg included in his answer as I was writing my comment.)
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's the law of "sines" not "signs". So it would state that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. To misquote it, as the book did, as $frac 540 = frac XY70$ is just plain wrong as $x ne sin x$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$XY=frac2.5sin20^circ=7.3095...$$
Another way:
$$fracXYsin70^circ=frac5sin40^circ,$$ which gives the same result:
$$XY=frac5sin70^circsin40^circ=7.3095...$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
which is wrong according to the answer... The other way of computing it using law of signs gets us 8.75, what's going on?
$endgroup$
– Dov
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Dov I added something. See now.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Dov: In the second approach, you've left off the sines in using the law of sines. (Which I now see that Rozenberg included in his answer as I was writing my comment.)
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's the law of "sines" not "signs". So it would state that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. To misquote it, as the book did, as $frac 540 = frac XY70$ is just plain wrong as $x ne sin x$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$XY=frac2.5sin20^circ=7.3095...$$
Another way:
$$fracXYsin70^circ=frac5sin40^circ,$$ which gives the same result:
$$XY=frac5sin70^circsin40^circ=7.3095...$$
$endgroup$
$$XY=frac2.5sin20^circ=7.3095...$$
Another way:
$$fracXYsin70^circ=frac5sin40^circ,$$ which gives the same result:
$$XY=frac5sin70^circsin40^circ=7.3095...$$
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
Michael RozenbergMichael Rozenberg
122k20 gold badges105 silver badges210 bronze badges
122k20 gold badges105 silver badges210 bronze badges
$begingroup$
which is wrong according to the answer... The other way of computing it using law of signs gets us 8.75, what's going on?
$endgroup$
– Dov
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Dov I added something. See now.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Dov: In the second approach, you've left off the sines in using the law of sines. (Which I now see that Rozenberg included in his answer as I was writing my comment.)
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's the law of "sines" not "signs". So it would state that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. To misquote it, as the book did, as $frac 540 = frac XY70$ is just plain wrong as $x ne sin x$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
which is wrong according to the answer... The other way of computing it using law of signs gets us 8.75, what's going on?
$endgroup$
– Dov
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Dov I added something. See now.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Dov: In the second approach, you've left off the sines in using the law of sines. (Which I now see that Rozenberg included in his answer as I was writing my comment.)
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's the law of "sines" not "signs". So it would state that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. To misquote it, as the book did, as $frac 540 = frac XY70$ is just plain wrong as $x ne sin x$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
which is wrong according to the answer... The other way of computing it using law of signs gets us 8.75, what's going on?
$endgroup$
– Dov
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
which is wrong according to the answer... The other way of computing it using law of signs gets us 8.75, what's going on?
$endgroup$
– Dov
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Dov I added something. See now.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Dov I added something. See now.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Dov: In the second approach, you've left off the sines in using the law of sines. (Which I now see that Rozenberg included in his answer as I was writing my comment.)
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Dov: In the second approach, you've left off the sines in using the law of sines. (Which I now see that Rozenberg included in his answer as I was writing my comment.)
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's the law of "sines" not "signs". So it would state that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. To misquote it, as the book did, as $frac 540 = frac XY70$ is just plain wrong as $x ne sin x$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's the law of "sines" not "signs". So it would state that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. To misquote it, as the book did, as $frac 540 = frac XY70$ is just plain wrong as $x ne sin x$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3312660%2fcant-understand-an-act-practice-problem-triangle-appears-to-be-isosceles-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Get another book. NOW! The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XY70$ is ... baseless. It seems like they want to use the law of sins that says $frac 5sin a = frac xysin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as yours.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Their statement $5/40=XY/70$ is unjustified and wrong.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Which book is this? I have an ACT book and I want to make sure it's not the same one?
$endgroup$
– Gnumbertester
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
The book is probably going for the law of sines that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. But that the book would make such a typo and then actually calculate based on that typo does not speak well for the text. The OP was correct and the book was dead wrong.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
7 hours ago