Other than a swing wing, what types of variable geometry have flown?What are the advantages and disadvantages of an oblique wing over a swing wing?Which airplane designs have the greatest longevity?Did the Swiss Air Force assist Austria in self-defence during the Yugoslav War?What impact did the Concorde have on business of other sub-sonic airliners?Could a blown wing ever be powerful enough to lift an aircraft at zero forward velocity?What are the advantages of a variable-incidence wing as used in the F-8?Could Concorde have used swing wings?Have other designs for individual gasper ventilation been tried?Did the contemporaries of the F-14 also have automatic swing wings?Did WW2-era aircraft have constant-speed or variable-pitch props?What would have been the other stops of Amelia Earhart's ill fated last voyage?
What rules turn any attack that hits a given target into a critical hit?
Is it possible to access the complete command line including pipes in a bash script?
Were the Apollo broadcasts recorded locally on the LM?
Why did computer video outputs go from digital to analog, then back to digital?
What kind of world would drive brains to evolve high-throughput sensory?
Does switching on an old games console without a cartridge damage it?
Inverse Colombian Function
Why can't a country print its own money to spend it only abroad?
Can we have too many dialogue tags and follow up actions?
What is a "staved" town, like in "Staverton"?
Company requiring me to let them review research from before I was hired
Are rockets faster than airplanes?
Wiring IKEA light fixture into old fixture
Can GPL and BSD licensed applications be used for government work?
What kind of anatomy does a centaur have?
Has Peter Parker ever eaten bugs?
What does a black-and-white Puerto Rican flag signify?
How to Sow[] until I've Reap[]'d enough?
High income and difficulty during interviews
My current job follows "worst practices". How can I talk about my experience in an interview without giving off red flags?
What was the rationale behind 36 bit computer architectures?
Can't understand how static works exactly
Why did modems have speakers?
how to add 1 milliseconds on a datetime string?
Other than a swing wing, what types of variable geometry have flown?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of an oblique wing over a swing wing?Which airplane designs have the greatest longevity?Did the Swiss Air Force assist Austria in self-defence during the Yugoslav War?What impact did the Concorde have on business of other sub-sonic airliners?Could a blown wing ever be powerful enough to lift an aircraft at zero forward velocity?What are the advantages of a variable-incidence wing as used in the F-8?Could Concorde have used swing wings?Have other designs for individual gasper ventilation been tried?Did the contemporaries of the F-14 also have automatic swing wings?Did WW2-era aircraft have constant-speed or variable-pitch props?What would have been the other stops of Amelia Earhart's ill fated last voyage?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
We're well familiar with swing wings, on small and large aircraft from both the east and west.
What other types of variable geometry have been tried?
aircraft-design aviation-history
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We're well familiar with swing wings, on small and large aircraft from both the east and west.
What other types of variable geometry have been tried?
aircraft-design aviation-history
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We're well familiar with swing wings, on small and large aircraft from both the east and west.
What other types of variable geometry have been tried?
aircraft-design aviation-history
$endgroup$
We're well familiar with swing wings, on small and large aircraft from both the east and west.
What other types of variable geometry have been tried?
aircraft-design aviation-history
aircraft-design aviation-history
asked 9 hours ago
AdamAdam
4802 silver badges11 bronze badges
4802 silver badges11 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Extending wings
The idea is to have a larger wing area at takeoff for more lift and a smaller wing area in flight for more efficiency.
The NIAI RK and followup RK-I used two tandem wings that served as rails for an extendable panel that could be rolled out between them.
The project failed because Stalin was so enthusiastic about it he had it use the most powerful engine available which was too unreliable. I can't find a reason why the concept was not tried again.
The German FS-29 glider of 1972 had a different arrangement. It had an outer wing that fit over an inner wing and could unsheathe like a sword. Only one was built.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Oblique Wing
A normal wing at takeoff then pivots during flight. High-risk idea to make transport aircraft more efficient in the transonic regime.
Lighter and simpler than a swing wing, with no change in the center of lift as the geometry is changed. Disadvantage is that flight characteristics become asymmetric left and right, plus problems with rigidity. See this question for more.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You should combine this with your other answer.
$endgroup$
– AEhere
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Please, as AEhere says, merge your two answers. If you don't know how to do it, I can do it for you.
$endgroup$
– Federico♦
53 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Variable Camber Wing
From the late 60s to the early 90s NASA tested experimental variants of their F-111s; at one period they were trying out a "Mission Adaptive Wing":
The second phase called transonic aircraft technology (TACT/F-111A)
added an highly efficient supercritical wing and later the third phase
applied advanced wing (Mission Adaptive Wing-MAW) flight control
technologies and was called Advanced Fighter Technology Integration
(AFTI/F-111A). source
The F-111 was already a swing-wing aircraft, but this modification was a supercricital mission-adaptive wing with smooth variable camber, similar to the aero-elastic wing already mentioned.
Flight research concept can be read here and results can be read here.
source In flight - compare with landing wing below.
source
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
My dad worked on this program!
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In addition to types already mentioned by other answers:
Tiltwing
Was used to allow VTOL operations by tilting the entire wing, as can be seen on the Hiller X-18. The concept was never used outside testing as far as I can tell.
Aeroelastic Wing
Tested on the X-29 and later on the Boeing X-53, which was based on the F/A-18 Hornet. The idea here is that the wing can be twisted to control roll, giving better control while reducing load on the aircraft. Only used in testing so far.
Canard Rotor/Wing
The concept was that an aircraft could use a rotary wing similar to a helicopter for vertical take-off and landing; once up to speed it would stop the rotor and use it as a conventional wing. Was never tested in VTOL mode and the project was cancelled. See Boeing X-50 Dragonfly for more information.
Variable geometry wingtip
The XB-70 Valkyrie had hinged wingtips which could be angled downwards by up to 65 degrees to improve lift and stability in certain regimes.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Variable incidence, on the F-8 Crusader.
From the Wiki page:
The most innovative aspect of the design was the variable-incidence wing which pivoted by 7° out of the fuselage on takeoff and landing (not to be confused with variable-sweep wing). This allowed a greater angle of attack, increasing lift without compromising forward visibility.
Tiltrotor, on the V-22 Osprey
From the Wiki page:
A tiltrotor aircraft differs from a tiltwing in that only the rotor pivots rather than the entire wing. This method trades off efficiency in vertical flight for efficiency in STOL/STOVL operations.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66896%2fother-than-a-swing-wing-what-types-of-variable-geometry-have-flown%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Extending wings
The idea is to have a larger wing area at takeoff for more lift and a smaller wing area in flight for more efficiency.
The NIAI RK and followup RK-I used two tandem wings that served as rails for an extendable panel that could be rolled out between them.
The project failed because Stalin was so enthusiastic about it he had it use the most powerful engine available which was too unreliable. I can't find a reason why the concept was not tried again.
The German FS-29 glider of 1972 had a different arrangement. It had an outer wing that fit over an inner wing and could unsheathe like a sword. Only one was built.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Extending wings
The idea is to have a larger wing area at takeoff for more lift and a smaller wing area in flight for more efficiency.
The NIAI RK and followup RK-I used two tandem wings that served as rails for an extendable panel that could be rolled out between them.
The project failed because Stalin was so enthusiastic about it he had it use the most powerful engine available which was too unreliable. I can't find a reason why the concept was not tried again.
The German FS-29 glider of 1972 had a different arrangement. It had an outer wing that fit over an inner wing and could unsheathe like a sword. Only one was built.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Extending wings
The idea is to have a larger wing area at takeoff for more lift and a smaller wing area in flight for more efficiency.
The NIAI RK and followup RK-I used two tandem wings that served as rails for an extendable panel that could be rolled out between them.
The project failed because Stalin was so enthusiastic about it he had it use the most powerful engine available which was too unreliable. I can't find a reason why the concept was not tried again.
The German FS-29 glider of 1972 had a different arrangement. It had an outer wing that fit over an inner wing and could unsheathe like a sword. Only one was built.
$endgroup$
Extending wings
The idea is to have a larger wing area at takeoff for more lift and a smaller wing area in flight for more efficiency.
The NIAI RK and followup RK-I used two tandem wings that served as rails for an extendable panel that could be rolled out between them.
The project failed because Stalin was so enthusiastic about it he had it use the most powerful engine available which was too unreliable. I can't find a reason why the concept was not tried again.
The German FS-29 glider of 1972 had a different arrangement. It had an outer wing that fit over an inner wing and could unsheathe like a sword. Only one was built.
answered 9 hours ago
AdamAdam
4802 silver badges11 bronze badges
4802 silver badges11 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Oblique Wing
A normal wing at takeoff then pivots during flight. High-risk idea to make transport aircraft more efficient in the transonic regime.
Lighter and simpler than a swing wing, with no change in the center of lift as the geometry is changed. Disadvantage is that flight characteristics become asymmetric left and right, plus problems with rigidity. See this question for more.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You should combine this with your other answer.
$endgroup$
– AEhere
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Please, as AEhere says, merge your two answers. If you don't know how to do it, I can do it for you.
$endgroup$
– Federico♦
53 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Oblique Wing
A normal wing at takeoff then pivots during flight. High-risk idea to make transport aircraft more efficient in the transonic regime.
Lighter and simpler than a swing wing, with no change in the center of lift as the geometry is changed. Disadvantage is that flight characteristics become asymmetric left and right, plus problems with rigidity. See this question for more.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You should combine this with your other answer.
$endgroup$
– AEhere
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Please, as AEhere says, merge your two answers. If you don't know how to do it, I can do it for you.
$endgroup$
– Federico♦
53 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Oblique Wing
A normal wing at takeoff then pivots during flight. High-risk idea to make transport aircraft more efficient in the transonic regime.
Lighter and simpler than a swing wing, with no change in the center of lift as the geometry is changed. Disadvantage is that flight characteristics become asymmetric left and right, plus problems with rigidity. See this question for more.
$endgroup$
Oblique Wing
A normal wing at takeoff then pivots during flight. High-risk idea to make transport aircraft more efficient in the transonic regime.
Lighter and simpler than a swing wing, with no change in the center of lift as the geometry is changed. Disadvantage is that flight characteristics become asymmetric left and right, plus problems with rigidity. See this question for more.
answered 8 hours ago
AdamAdam
4802 silver badges11 bronze badges
4802 silver badges11 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
You should combine this with your other answer.
$endgroup$
– AEhere
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Please, as AEhere says, merge your two answers. If you don't know how to do it, I can do it for you.
$endgroup$
– Federico♦
53 mins ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You should combine this with your other answer.
$endgroup$
– AEhere
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Please, as AEhere says, merge your two answers. If you don't know how to do it, I can do it for you.
$endgroup$
– Federico♦
53 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
You should combine this with your other answer.
$endgroup$
– AEhere
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
You should combine this with your other answer.
$endgroup$
– AEhere
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Please, as AEhere says, merge your two answers. If you don't know how to do it, I can do it for you.
$endgroup$
– Federico♦
53 mins ago
$begingroup$
Please, as AEhere says, merge your two answers. If you don't know how to do it, I can do it for you.
$endgroup$
– Federico♦
53 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Variable Camber Wing
From the late 60s to the early 90s NASA tested experimental variants of their F-111s; at one period they were trying out a "Mission Adaptive Wing":
The second phase called transonic aircraft technology (TACT/F-111A)
added an highly efficient supercritical wing and later the third phase
applied advanced wing (Mission Adaptive Wing-MAW) flight control
technologies and was called Advanced Fighter Technology Integration
(AFTI/F-111A). source
The F-111 was already a swing-wing aircraft, but this modification was a supercricital mission-adaptive wing with smooth variable camber, similar to the aero-elastic wing already mentioned.
Flight research concept can be read here and results can be read here.
source In flight - compare with landing wing below.
source
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
My dad worked on this program!
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Variable Camber Wing
From the late 60s to the early 90s NASA tested experimental variants of their F-111s; at one period they were trying out a "Mission Adaptive Wing":
The second phase called transonic aircraft technology (TACT/F-111A)
added an highly efficient supercritical wing and later the third phase
applied advanced wing (Mission Adaptive Wing-MAW) flight control
technologies and was called Advanced Fighter Technology Integration
(AFTI/F-111A). source
The F-111 was already a swing-wing aircraft, but this modification was a supercricital mission-adaptive wing with smooth variable camber, similar to the aero-elastic wing already mentioned.
Flight research concept can be read here and results can be read here.
source In flight - compare with landing wing below.
source
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
My dad worked on this program!
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Variable Camber Wing
From the late 60s to the early 90s NASA tested experimental variants of their F-111s; at one period they were trying out a "Mission Adaptive Wing":
The second phase called transonic aircraft technology (TACT/F-111A)
added an highly efficient supercritical wing and later the third phase
applied advanced wing (Mission Adaptive Wing-MAW) flight control
technologies and was called Advanced Fighter Technology Integration
(AFTI/F-111A). source
The F-111 was already a swing-wing aircraft, but this modification was a supercricital mission-adaptive wing with smooth variable camber, similar to the aero-elastic wing already mentioned.
Flight research concept can be read here and results can be read here.
source In flight - compare with landing wing below.
source
$endgroup$
Variable Camber Wing
From the late 60s to the early 90s NASA tested experimental variants of their F-111s; at one period they were trying out a "Mission Adaptive Wing":
The second phase called transonic aircraft technology (TACT/F-111A)
added an highly efficient supercritical wing and later the third phase
applied advanced wing (Mission Adaptive Wing-MAW) flight control
technologies and was called Advanced Fighter Technology Integration
(AFTI/F-111A). source
The F-111 was already a swing-wing aircraft, but this modification was a supercricital mission-adaptive wing with smooth variable camber, similar to the aero-elastic wing already mentioned.
Flight research concept can be read here and results can be read here.
source In flight - compare with landing wing below.
source
answered 8 hours ago
Party ArkParty Ark
3,9242 gold badges23 silver badges42 bronze badges
3,9242 gold badges23 silver badges42 bronze badges
2
$begingroup$
My dad worked on this program!
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
6 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
My dad worked on this program!
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
6 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
My dad worked on this program!
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
My dad worked on this program!
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In addition to types already mentioned by other answers:
Tiltwing
Was used to allow VTOL operations by tilting the entire wing, as can be seen on the Hiller X-18. The concept was never used outside testing as far as I can tell.
Aeroelastic Wing
Tested on the X-29 and later on the Boeing X-53, which was based on the F/A-18 Hornet. The idea here is that the wing can be twisted to control roll, giving better control while reducing load on the aircraft. Only used in testing so far.
Canard Rotor/Wing
The concept was that an aircraft could use a rotary wing similar to a helicopter for vertical take-off and landing; once up to speed it would stop the rotor and use it as a conventional wing. Was never tested in VTOL mode and the project was cancelled. See Boeing X-50 Dragonfly for more information.
Variable geometry wingtip
The XB-70 Valkyrie had hinged wingtips which could be angled downwards by up to 65 degrees to improve lift and stability in certain regimes.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In addition to types already mentioned by other answers:
Tiltwing
Was used to allow VTOL operations by tilting the entire wing, as can be seen on the Hiller X-18. The concept was never used outside testing as far as I can tell.
Aeroelastic Wing
Tested on the X-29 and later on the Boeing X-53, which was based on the F/A-18 Hornet. The idea here is that the wing can be twisted to control roll, giving better control while reducing load on the aircraft. Only used in testing so far.
Canard Rotor/Wing
The concept was that an aircraft could use a rotary wing similar to a helicopter for vertical take-off and landing; once up to speed it would stop the rotor and use it as a conventional wing. Was never tested in VTOL mode and the project was cancelled. See Boeing X-50 Dragonfly for more information.
Variable geometry wingtip
The XB-70 Valkyrie had hinged wingtips which could be angled downwards by up to 65 degrees to improve lift and stability in certain regimes.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In addition to types already mentioned by other answers:
Tiltwing
Was used to allow VTOL operations by tilting the entire wing, as can be seen on the Hiller X-18. The concept was never used outside testing as far as I can tell.
Aeroelastic Wing
Tested on the X-29 and later on the Boeing X-53, which was based on the F/A-18 Hornet. The idea here is that the wing can be twisted to control roll, giving better control while reducing load on the aircraft. Only used in testing so far.
Canard Rotor/Wing
The concept was that an aircraft could use a rotary wing similar to a helicopter for vertical take-off and landing; once up to speed it would stop the rotor and use it as a conventional wing. Was never tested in VTOL mode and the project was cancelled. See Boeing X-50 Dragonfly for more information.
Variable geometry wingtip
The XB-70 Valkyrie had hinged wingtips which could be angled downwards by up to 65 degrees to improve lift and stability in certain regimes.
$endgroup$
In addition to types already mentioned by other answers:
Tiltwing
Was used to allow VTOL operations by tilting the entire wing, as can be seen on the Hiller X-18. The concept was never used outside testing as far as I can tell.
Aeroelastic Wing
Tested on the X-29 and later on the Boeing X-53, which was based on the F/A-18 Hornet. The idea here is that the wing can be twisted to control roll, giving better control while reducing load on the aircraft. Only used in testing so far.
Canard Rotor/Wing
The concept was that an aircraft could use a rotary wing similar to a helicopter for vertical take-off and landing; once up to speed it would stop the rotor and use it as a conventional wing. Was never tested in VTOL mode and the project was cancelled. See Boeing X-50 Dragonfly for more information.
Variable geometry wingtip
The XB-70 Valkyrie had hinged wingtips which could be angled downwards by up to 65 degrees to improve lift and stability in certain regimes.
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
bjelleklangbjelleklang
1,0054 silver badges14 bronze badges
1,0054 silver badges14 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Variable incidence, on the F-8 Crusader.
From the Wiki page:
The most innovative aspect of the design was the variable-incidence wing which pivoted by 7° out of the fuselage on takeoff and landing (not to be confused with variable-sweep wing). This allowed a greater angle of attack, increasing lift without compromising forward visibility.
Tiltrotor, on the V-22 Osprey
From the Wiki page:
A tiltrotor aircraft differs from a tiltwing in that only the rotor pivots rather than the entire wing. This method trades off efficiency in vertical flight for efficiency in STOL/STOVL operations.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Variable incidence, on the F-8 Crusader.
From the Wiki page:
The most innovative aspect of the design was the variable-incidence wing which pivoted by 7° out of the fuselage on takeoff and landing (not to be confused with variable-sweep wing). This allowed a greater angle of attack, increasing lift without compromising forward visibility.
Tiltrotor, on the V-22 Osprey
From the Wiki page:
A tiltrotor aircraft differs from a tiltwing in that only the rotor pivots rather than the entire wing. This method trades off efficiency in vertical flight for efficiency in STOL/STOVL operations.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Variable incidence, on the F-8 Crusader.
From the Wiki page:
The most innovative aspect of the design was the variable-incidence wing which pivoted by 7° out of the fuselage on takeoff and landing (not to be confused with variable-sweep wing). This allowed a greater angle of attack, increasing lift without compromising forward visibility.
Tiltrotor, on the V-22 Osprey
From the Wiki page:
A tiltrotor aircraft differs from a tiltwing in that only the rotor pivots rather than the entire wing. This method trades off efficiency in vertical flight for efficiency in STOL/STOVL operations.
$endgroup$
Variable incidence, on the F-8 Crusader.
From the Wiki page:
The most innovative aspect of the design was the variable-incidence wing which pivoted by 7° out of the fuselage on takeoff and landing (not to be confused with variable-sweep wing). This allowed a greater angle of attack, increasing lift without compromising forward visibility.
Tiltrotor, on the V-22 Osprey
From the Wiki page:
A tiltrotor aircraft differs from a tiltwing in that only the rotor pivots rather than the entire wing. This method trades off efficiency in vertical flight for efficiency in STOL/STOVL operations.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
KoyovisKoyovis
32.9k8 gold badges86 silver badges173 bronze badges
32.9k8 gold badges86 silver badges173 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66896%2fother-than-a-swing-wing-what-types-of-variable-geometry-have-flown%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown