Grid puzzle solutionsIntroducing: Number Slope™HAISU (Room Count): An original grid-logic challengeA Six-Faced PuzzleMaking a grid deduction puzzleLogic 5x5 Letter Number Combination GridBullet Drop™ #1HAISU with a twistOriental HAISU - An unoriginal grid-deduction challengeModified Intersection PuzzleYou Sign Me Right Round
Xcode 10.3 Installation
On the history of Haar measure
Short story where a flexible reality hardens to an unchanging one
How can Kazakhstan perform MITM attacks on all HTTPS traffic?
Was US film used in Luna 3?
If I have the Armor of Shadows Eldritch Invocation do I know the Mage Armor spell?
Is an easily guessed plot twist a good plot twist?
Extrapolation v. Interpolation
Grid puzzle solutions
What is "It is x o'clock" in Japanese with subject
Giving blur shadow to plot
What's the 1 inch size square knob sticking out of wall?
Impact of throwing away fruit waste on a peak > 3200 m above a glacier
Were the Apollo broadcasts recorded locally on the LM?
What is a plausible power source to indefinitely sustain a space station?
Bounded Torsion, without Mazur’s Theorem
Does quantity of data extensions impact performance?
Is the apartment I want to rent a scam?
Do I care if the housing market has gone up or down, if I'm moving from one house to another?
How can I indicate that what I'm saying is not sarcastic online?
ExactlyOne extension method
What kind of world would drive brains to evolve high-throughput sensory?
How can I calculate the cost of Skyss bus tickets
Chemistry Riddle
Grid puzzle solutions
Introducing: Number Slope™HAISU (Room Count): An original grid-logic challengeA Six-Faced PuzzleMaking a grid deduction puzzleLogic 5x5 Letter Number Combination GridBullet Drop™ #1HAISU with a twistOriental HAISU - An unoriginal grid-deduction challengeModified Intersection PuzzleYou Sign Me Right Round
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I have a simple grid puzzle:
Example:
| X | Y | X |
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
The move is defined as a row or a column move. So when you move one cell, whole column/row moves.
Example top row right 2 steps:
1 step
| X | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
2 step
| Y | X | X |
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
Now column move will look like this on the last row move up
1 step
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | X |
and so MoveRight - the most right cell will become the most left cell etc...
I am wondering if it is possible to go to every possible grid combination only with this moves. Let's assume that the grid will be 3x3 but it can be any size.
So, for example, I create random grid 3x3 with the same X count and Y count like this:
| Y | Y | Y |
| Y | Y | X |
| X | X | X |
Is it possible to check if there is a solution on how to make this grid the first grid with already specified moves? Or how to approach this problem?
Thanks, everyone.
grid-deduction
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a simple grid puzzle:
Example:
| X | Y | X |
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
The move is defined as a row or a column move. So when you move one cell, whole column/row moves.
Example top row right 2 steps:
1 step
| X | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
2 step
| Y | X | X |
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
Now column move will look like this on the last row move up
1 step
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | X |
and so MoveRight - the most right cell will become the most left cell etc...
I am wondering if it is possible to go to every possible grid combination only with this moves. Let's assume that the grid will be 3x3 but it can be any size.
So, for example, I create random grid 3x3 with the same X count and Y count like this:
| Y | Y | Y |
| Y | Y | X |
| X | X | X |
Is it possible to check if there is a solution on how to make this grid the first grid with already specified moves? Or how to approach this problem?
Thanks, everyone.
grid-deduction
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Are we guaranteed that it will be a 3x3 grid and only two values (X and Y)? With such a small grid, you can just brute force the solution by generating every possible configuration
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Parseltongue No, this is just an example. It can even have every cell other char and the size can be bigger. I am currently building a playable solution to try that, but I want to know more non-brute force method.
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Here's a 4x4 one from Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection, but you can change the size from the drop down. chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/puzzles/js/sixteen.html
$endgroup$
– Ted
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm not sure of any solution that doesn't just use transposition tables
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Ted That is exactly the puzzle I mean. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a simple grid puzzle:
Example:
| X | Y | X |
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
The move is defined as a row or a column move. So when you move one cell, whole column/row moves.
Example top row right 2 steps:
1 step
| X | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
2 step
| Y | X | X |
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
Now column move will look like this on the last row move up
1 step
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | X |
and so MoveRight - the most right cell will become the most left cell etc...
I am wondering if it is possible to go to every possible grid combination only with this moves. Let's assume that the grid will be 3x3 but it can be any size.
So, for example, I create random grid 3x3 with the same X count and Y count like this:
| Y | Y | Y |
| Y | Y | X |
| X | X | X |
Is it possible to check if there is a solution on how to make this grid the first grid with already specified moves? Or how to approach this problem?
Thanks, everyone.
grid-deduction
New contributor
$endgroup$
I have a simple grid puzzle:
Example:
| X | Y | X |
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
The move is defined as a row or a column move. So when you move one cell, whole column/row moves.
Example top row right 2 steps:
1 step
| X | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
2 step
| Y | X | X |
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
Now column move will look like this on the last row move up
1 step
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | Y |
| Y | X | X |
and so MoveRight - the most right cell will become the most left cell etc...
I am wondering if it is possible to go to every possible grid combination only with this moves. Let's assume that the grid will be 3x3 but it can be any size.
So, for example, I create random grid 3x3 with the same X count and Y count like this:
| Y | Y | Y |
| Y | Y | X |
| X | X | X |
Is it possible to check if there is a solution on how to make this grid the first grid with already specified moves? Or how to approach this problem?
Thanks, everyone.
grid-deduction
grid-deduction
New contributor
New contributor
edited 7 hours ago
Nautilus
4,3206 silver badges26 bronze badges
4,3206 silver badges26 bronze badges
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
Jakub GabčoJakub Gabčo
283 bronze badges
283 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Are we guaranteed that it will be a 3x3 grid and only two values (X and Y)? With such a small grid, you can just brute force the solution by generating every possible configuration
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Parseltongue No, this is just an example. It can even have every cell other char and the size can be bigger. I am currently building a playable solution to try that, but I want to know more non-brute force method.
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Here's a 4x4 one from Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection, but you can change the size from the drop down. chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/puzzles/js/sixteen.html
$endgroup$
– Ted
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm not sure of any solution that doesn't just use transposition tables
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Ted That is exactly the puzzle I mean. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Are we guaranteed that it will be a 3x3 grid and only two values (X and Y)? With such a small grid, you can just brute force the solution by generating every possible configuration
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Parseltongue No, this is just an example. It can even have every cell other char and the size can be bigger. I am currently building a playable solution to try that, but I want to know more non-brute force method.
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Here's a 4x4 one from Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection, but you can change the size from the drop down. chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/puzzles/js/sixteen.html
$endgroup$
– Ted
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm not sure of any solution that doesn't just use transposition tables
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Ted That is exactly the puzzle I mean. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are we guaranteed that it will be a 3x3 grid and only two values (X and Y)? With such a small grid, you can just brute force the solution by generating every possible configuration
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are we guaranteed that it will be a 3x3 grid and only two values (X and Y)? With such a small grid, you can just brute force the solution by generating every possible configuration
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Parseltongue No, this is just an example. It can even have every cell other char and the size can be bigger. I am currently building a playable solution to try that, but I want to know more non-brute force method.
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Parseltongue No, this is just an example. It can even have every cell other char and the size can be bigger. I am currently building a playable solution to try that, but I want to know more non-brute force method.
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Here's a 4x4 one from Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection, but you can change the size from the drop down. chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/puzzles/js/sixteen.html
$endgroup$
– Ted
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Here's a 4x4 one from Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection, but you can change the size from the drop down. chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/puzzles/js/sixteen.html
$endgroup$
– Ted
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm not sure of any solution that doesn't just use transposition tables
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm not sure of any solution that doesn't just use transposition tables
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Ted That is exactly the puzzle I mean. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Ted That is exactly the puzzle I mean. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In the general case (all symbols allowed), you cannot reach every position. The argument is a parity argument, similar to how half of the configurations of a Rubik's Cube cannot be achieved.
Every legal move in your game is equivalent to an even number of "swaps". Say you start with
ABC
DEF
GHI
and move the top row right:
CAB
DEF
GHI
This is equivalent to swapping BC, and then swapping the resulting AC:
ACB
DEF
GHI
CAB
DEF
GHI
Every move you can make is similarly equivalent to two swaps. This means that every position you can possibly ever arrive at is the equivalent of an even number of swaps.
The result of this is that you cannot ever arrive at a configuration that requires an odd number of swaps, like this one:
BAC
DEF
GHI
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This answer is gold. Didn't realize that is like Rubick's cube. Thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
For 4x4 this does not apply if I am right .. There are 3 swaps in 4x4 so only solutions are that has swipes count % 3 == 0. For 5x5 there are 4 swaps and so on..
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes - a move in 4x4 is equivalent to 3 swaps, meaning that you can arrive at both even and odd configurations. My response is for odd-sized square grids - I don't have a proof either way about even-sized square grids or rectangular grids with an even and an odd dimension. Ah, yes - I see your edit and that is the proof. Whatever the sizes, there will be configurations that aren't equal to 0 mod k for some relevant k.
$endgroup$
– user61579
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm confused as to how this constrains the search space, though? You still have to actually figure out if it's possible to get from position A to B in an even number of swaps (for 3x3), which still requires brute-forcing. The fact that you CAN get to a position in an odd number of swaps doesn't mean anything unless all your values are distinct. For example if you have[ACB] [BCA] [GHI]
You can get["BAC"]
in the top row in an even number of swaps, even though you can also get to it in an odd number of swaps.
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Jakub Gabčo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f86467%2fgrid-puzzle-solutions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In the general case (all symbols allowed), you cannot reach every position. The argument is a parity argument, similar to how half of the configurations of a Rubik's Cube cannot be achieved.
Every legal move in your game is equivalent to an even number of "swaps". Say you start with
ABC
DEF
GHI
and move the top row right:
CAB
DEF
GHI
This is equivalent to swapping BC, and then swapping the resulting AC:
ACB
DEF
GHI
CAB
DEF
GHI
Every move you can make is similarly equivalent to two swaps. This means that every position you can possibly ever arrive at is the equivalent of an even number of swaps.
The result of this is that you cannot ever arrive at a configuration that requires an odd number of swaps, like this one:
BAC
DEF
GHI
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This answer is gold. Didn't realize that is like Rubick's cube. Thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
For 4x4 this does not apply if I am right .. There are 3 swaps in 4x4 so only solutions are that has swipes count % 3 == 0. For 5x5 there are 4 swaps and so on..
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes - a move in 4x4 is equivalent to 3 swaps, meaning that you can arrive at both even and odd configurations. My response is for odd-sized square grids - I don't have a proof either way about even-sized square grids or rectangular grids with an even and an odd dimension. Ah, yes - I see your edit and that is the proof. Whatever the sizes, there will be configurations that aren't equal to 0 mod k for some relevant k.
$endgroup$
– user61579
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm confused as to how this constrains the search space, though? You still have to actually figure out if it's possible to get from position A to B in an even number of swaps (for 3x3), which still requires brute-forcing. The fact that you CAN get to a position in an odd number of swaps doesn't mean anything unless all your values are distinct. For example if you have[ACB] [BCA] [GHI]
You can get["BAC"]
in the top row in an even number of swaps, even though you can also get to it in an odd number of swaps.
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the general case (all symbols allowed), you cannot reach every position. The argument is a parity argument, similar to how half of the configurations of a Rubik's Cube cannot be achieved.
Every legal move in your game is equivalent to an even number of "swaps". Say you start with
ABC
DEF
GHI
and move the top row right:
CAB
DEF
GHI
This is equivalent to swapping BC, and then swapping the resulting AC:
ACB
DEF
GHI
CAB
DEF
GHI
Every move you can make is similarly equivalent to two swaps. This means that every position you can possibly ever arrive at is the equivalent of an even number of swaps.
The result of this is that you cannot ever arrive at a configuration that requires an odd number of swaps, like this one:
BAC
DEF
GHI
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This answer is gold. Didn't realize that is like Rubick's cube. Thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
For 4x4 this does not apply if I am right .. There are 3 swaps in 4x4 so only solutions are that has swipes count % 3 == 0. For 5x5 there are 4 swaps and so on..
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes - a move in 4x4 is equivalent to 3 swaps, meaning that you can arrive at both even and odd configurations. My response is for odd-sized square grids - I don't have a proof either way about even-sized square grids or rectangular grids with an even and an odd dimension. Ah, yes - I see your edit and that is the proof. Whatever the sizes, there will be configurations that aren't equal to 0 mod k for some relevant k.
$endgroup$
– user61579
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm confused as to how this constrains the search space, though? You still have to actually figure out if it's possible to get from position A to B in an even number of swaps (for 3x3), which still requires brute-forcing. The fact that you CAN get to a position in an odd number of swaps doesn't mean anything unless all your values are distinct. For example if you have[ACB] [BCA] [GHI]
You can get["BAC"]
in the top row in an even number of swaps, even though you can also get to it in an odd number of swaps.
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the general case (all symbols allowed), you cannot reach every position. The argument is a parity argument, similar to how half of the configurations of a Rubik's Cube cannot be achieved.
Every legal move in your game is equivalent to an even number of "swaps". Say you start with
ABC
DEF
GHI
and move the top row right:
CAB
DEF
GHI
This is equivalent to swapping BC, and then swapping the resulting AC:
ACB
DEF
GHI
CAB
DEF
GHI
Every move you can make is similarly equivalent to two swaps. This means that every position you can possibly ever arrive at is the equivalent of an even number of swaps.
The result of this is that you cannot ever arrive at a configuration that requires an odd number of swaps, like this one:
BAC
DEF
GHI
New contributor
$endgroup$
In the general case (all symbols allowed), you cannot reach every position. The argument is a parity argument, similar to how half of the configurations of a Rubik's Cube cannot be achieved.
Every legal move in your game is equivalent to an even number of "swaps". Say you start with
ABC
DEF
GHI
and move the top row right:
CAB
DEF
GHI
This is equivalent to swapping BC, and then swapping the resulting AC:
ACB
DEF
GHI
CAB
DEF
GHI
Every move you can make is similarly equivalent to two swaps. This means that every position you can possibly ever arrive at is the equivalent of an even number of swaps.
The result of this is that you cannot ever arrive at a configuration that requires an odd number of swaps, like this one:
BAC
DEF
GHI
New contributor
New contributor
answered 6 hours ago
user61579user61579
661 bronze badge
661 bronze badge
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
This answer is gold. Didn't realize that is like Rubick's cube. Thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
For 4x4 this does not apply if I am right .. There are 3 swaps in 4x4 so only solutions are that has swipes count % 3 == 0. For 5x5 there are 4 swaps and so on..
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes - a move in 4x4 is equivalent to 3 swaps, meaning that you can arrive at both even and odd configurations. My response is for odd-sized square grids - I don't have a proof either way about even-sized square grids or rectangular grids with an even and an odd dimension. Ah, yes - I see your edit and that is the proof. Whatever the sizes, there will be configurations that aren't equal to 0 mod k for some relevant k.
$endgroup$
– user61579
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm confused as to how this constrains the search space, though? You still have to actually figure out if it's possible to get from position A to B in an even number of swaps (for 3x3), which still requires brute-forcing. The fact that you CAN get to a position in an odd number of swaps doesn't mean anything unless all your values are distinct. For example if you have[ACB] [BCA] [GHI]
You can get["BAC"]
in the top row in an even number of swaps, even though you can also get to it in an odd number of swaps.
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This answer is gold. Didn't realize that is like Rubick's cube. Thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
For 4x4 this does not apply if I am right .. There are 3 swaps in 4x4 so only solutions are that has swipes count % 3 == 0. For 5x5 there are 4 swaps and so on..
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes - a move in 4x4 is equivalent to 3 swaps, meaning that you can arrive at both even and odd configurations. My response is for odd-sized square grids - I don't have a proof either way about even-sized square grids or rectangular grids with an even and an odd dimension. Ah, yes - I see your edit and that is the proof. Whatever the sizes, there will be configurations that aren't equal to 0 mod k for some relevant k.
$endgroup$
– user61579
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm confused as to how this constrains the search space, though? You still have to actually figure out if it's possible to get from position A to B in an even number of swaps (for 3x3), which still requires brute-forcing. The fact that you CAN get to a position in an odd number of swaps doesn't mean anything unless all your values are distinct. For example if you have[ACB] [BCA] [GHI]
You can get["BAC"]
in the top row in an even number of swaps, even though you can also get to it in an odd number of swaps.
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer is gold. Didn't realize that is like Rubick's cube. Thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer is gold. Didn't realize that is like Rubick's cube. Thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
For 4x4 this does not apply if I am right .. There are 3 swaps in 4x4 so only solutions are that has swipes count % 3 == 0. For 5x5 there are 4 swaps and so on..
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
For 4x4 this does not apply if I am right .. There are 3 swaps in 4x4 so only solutions are that has swipes count % 3 == 0. For 5x5 there are 4 swaps and so on..
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes - a move in 4x4 is equivalent to 3 swaps, meaning that you can arrive at both even and odd configurations. My response is for odd-sized square grids - I don't have a proof either way about even-sized square grids or rectangular grids with an even and an odd dimension. Ah, yes - I see your edit and that is the proof. Whatever the sizes, there will be configurations that aren't equal to 0 mod k for some relevant k.
$endgroup$
– user61579
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes - a move in 4x4 is equivalent to 3 swaps, meaning that you can arrive at both even and odd configurations. My response is for odd-sized square grids - I don't have a proof either way about even-sized square grids or rectangular grids with an even and an odd dimension. Ah, yes - I see your edit and that is the proof. Whatever the sizes, there will be configurations that aren't equal to 0 mod k for some relevant k.
$endgroup$
– user61579
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm confused as to how this constrains the search space, though? You still have to actually figure out if it's possible to get from position A to B in an even number of swaps (for 3x3), which still requires brute-forcing. The fact that you CAN get to a position in an odd number of swaps doesn't mean anything unless all your values are distinct. For example if you have
[ACB] [BCA] [GHI]
You can get ["BAC"]
in the top row in an even number of swaps, even though you can also get to it in an odd number of swaps.$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm confused as to how this constrains the search space, though? You still have to actually figure out if it's possible to get from position A to B in an even number of swaps (for 3x3), which still requires brute-forcing. The fact that you CAN get to a position in an odd number of swaps doesn't mean anything unless all your values are distinct. For example if you have
[ACB] [BCA] [GHI]
You can get ["BAC"]
in the top row in an even number of swaps, even though you can also get to it in an odd number of swaps.$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Jakub Gabčo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jakub Gabčo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jakub Gabčo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jakub Gabčo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f86467%2fgrid-puzzle-solutions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Are we guaranteed that it will be a 3x3 grid and only two values (X and Y)? With such a small grid, you can just brute force the solution by generating every possible configuration
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Parseltongue No, this is just an example. It can even have every cell other char and the size can be bigger. I am currently building a playable solution to try that, but I want to know more non-brute force method.
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Here's a 4x4 one from Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection, but you can change the size from the drop down. chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/puzzles/js/sixteen.html
$endgroup$
– Ted
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm not sure of any solution that doesn't just use transposition tables
$endgroup$
– Parseltongue
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Ted That is exactly the puzzle I mean. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Jakub Gabčo
7 hours ago