Is there a standard frequency for wandering monster checks in a dungeon?Where can I find miniatures for AD&D monsters?What's a good way to deal with Random Encounters inside Dungeons?What Information Can I Use If I Want To Publish My Own D&D 5e Module?AD&D Treasure GenerationRemembering to add tracks and signs of wandering monstersWere there Martians in Greyhawk?Is Glasstaff and the entire Redbrand Hideout supposed to be this easy?How can a character detect lies?Which aspects of D&D 5e will be affected by incorporating the Savage Worlds “Card Draw Initiative”?What is the standard dungeon scale at the table?
When a ball on a rope swings in a circle, is there both centripetal force and tension force?
How should I interpret a promising preprint that was never published in a peer-reviewed journal?
Company looks for long-term employees, but I know I won't be interested in staying long
Which modern firearm should a time traveler bring to be easily reproducible for a historic civilization?
Table Formatting Suggestion
You have no, but can try for yes
When we are talking about black hole evaporation - what exactly happens?
Does the Bracer of Flying Daggers really let a thief make 4 attacks per round?
Can a creature sustain itself by eating its own severed body parts?
Is there a standard frequency for wandering monster checks in a dungeon?
A "Replace" sort problem. Basic but haunts me
Making a Dataset that emulates `ls -tlra`?
Is it ethical to tell my teaching assistant that I like them?
Did I pick the wrong bike?
Why would word of Princess Leia's capture generate sympathy for the Rebellion in the Senate?
Why are there few or no black super GMs?
Why isn't a binary file shown as 0s and 1s?
Could Europeans in Europe demand protection under UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples?
Do higher dimensions have axes?
Last-minute canceled work-trip means I'll lose thousands of dollars on planned vacation
Is it possible to have a career in SciComp without contributing to arms research?
Transistor power dissipation rating
Could a US citizen born through "birth tourism" become President?
What are my hardware upgrade optoins for a late 2009 iMac?
Is there a standard frequency for wandering monster checks in a dungeon?
Where can I find miniatures for AD&D monsters?What's a good way to deal with Random Encounters inside Dungeons?What Information Can I Use If I Want To Publish My Own D&D 5e Module?AD&D Treasure GenerationRemembering to add tracks and signs of wandering monstersWere there Martians in Greyhawk?Is Glasstaff and the entire Redbrand Hideout supposed to be this easy?How can a character detect lies?Which aspects of D&D 5e will be affected by incorporating the Savage Worlds “Card Draw Initiative”?What is the standard dungeon scale at the table?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Is there a standard or default frequency for wandering monster checks in an underground dungeon?
This concerns both dungeons of my own design, and existing modules either by TSR or Judges Guild that do not specify an encounter frequency for the dungeon.
adnd encounters
edited 2 hours ago
V2Blast♦
32.6k5 gold badges117 silver badges202 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
munkmunk
4223 silver badges11 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a standard or default frequency for wandering monster checks in an underground dungeon?
This concerns both dungeons of my own design, and existing modules either by TSR or Judges Guild that do not specify an encounter frequency for the dungeon.
adnd encounters
edited 2 hours ago
V2Blast♦
32.6k5 gold badges117 silver badges202 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
munkmunk
4223 silver badges11 bronze badges
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
Yes, I really am playing the ‘77 edition, hence the tag. There are three books in question and if you’ve read them you’d know they’re not known for their stellar organization.
$endgroup$
– munk
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Having spent the last few hours off and on trying and failing to track this down, I'm pretty eager to see an answer.
$endgroup$
– SevenSidedDie
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SevenSidedDie I think I've found it (but it relies on OD&D also ...)
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a standard or default frequency for wandering monster checks in an underground dungeon?
This concerns both dungeons of my own design, and existing modules either by TSR or Judges Guild that do not specify an encounter frequency for the dungeon.
adnd encounters
edited 2 hours ago
V2Blast♦
32.6k5 gold badges117 silver badges202 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
munkmunk
4223 silver badges11 bronze badges
$endgroup$
Is there a standard or default frequency for wandering monster checks in an underground dungeon?
This concerns both dungeons of my own design, and existing modules either by TSR or Judges Guild that do not specify an encounter frequency for the dungeon.
adnd encounters
adnd encounters
edited 2 hours ago
V2Blast♦
32.6k5 gold badges117 silver badges202 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
munkmunk
4223 silver badges11 bronze badges
edited 2 hours ago
V2Blast♦
32.6k5 gold badges117 silver badges202 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
munkmunk
4223 silver badges11 bronze badges
edited 2 hours ago
V2Blast♦
32.6k5 gold badges117 silver badges202 bronze badges
edited 2 hours ago
V2Blast♦
32.6k5 gold badges117 silver badges202 bronze badges
edited 2 hours ago
V2Blast♦
32.6k5 gold badges117 silver badges202 bronze badges
32.6k5 gold badges117 silver badges202 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
munkmunk
4223 silver badges11 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
munkmunk
4223 silver badges11 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
munkmunk
4223 silver badges11 bronze badges
4223 silver badges11 bronze badges
4
$begingroup$
Yes, I really am playing the ‘77 edition, hence the tag. There are three books in question and if you’ve read them you’d know they’re not known for their stellar organization.
$endgroup$
– munk
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Having spent the last few hours off and on trying and failing to track this down, I'm pretty eager to see an answer.
$endgroup$
– SevenSidedDie
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SevenSidedDie I think I've found it (but it relies on OD&D also ...)
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
5 hours ago
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
Yes, I really am playing the ‘77 edition, hence the tag. There are three books in question and if you’ve read them you’d know they’re not known for their stellar organization.
$endgroup$
– munk
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Having spent the last few hours off and on trying and failing to track this down, I'm pretty eager to see an answer.
$endgroup$
– SevenSidedDie
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SevenSidedDie I think I've found it (but it relies on OD&D also ...)
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
5 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
Yes, I really am playing the ‘77 edition, hence the tag. There are three books in question and if you’ve read them you’d know they’re not known for their stellar organization.
$endgroup$
– munk
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, I really am playing the ‘77 edition, hence the tag. There are three books in question and if you’ve read them you’d know they’re not known for their stellar organization.
$endgroup$
– munk
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Having spent the last few hours off and on trying and failing to track this down, I'm pretty eager to see an answer.
$endgroup$
– SevenSidedDie
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Having spent the last few hours off and on trying and failing to track this down, I'm pretty eager to see an answer.
$endgroup$
– SevenSidedDie
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SevenSidedDie I think I've found it (but it relies on OD&D also ...)
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SevenSidedDie I think I've found it (but it relies on OD&D also ...)
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Every three turns, unless the DM decides otherwise
This answer presumes that the only material you are using as a reference are the PHB, MM and DMG.
How did I come up with that answer? (I hear people wonder) The 1e DMG is, as you pointed out in a comment, organized in a counter intuitive fashion.
You'll find on page 190 of the DMG under City encounters the following text.
Check for encounters every three turns as normally, or otherwise as desired.
Where was the 'normally' covered? Nowhere, though "once per turn" was "normally" for the original game (see below). Walking back to 'keeping track of time' on page 38, we find:
It is essential that an accurate time record be kept so that the DM can determine when to check for wandering monsters, and in order to keep a strict check on the duration of some spells ... On occasion a party may wish to hole up for a long period perhaps over night ... this does not exempt them from occasional checks for wandering monsters, though the frequency may be moderated somewhat, depending on conditions ...
Maddeningly, for those looking for a concrete answer, a periodicity was implied on page 174 ...
When a random encounter is indicated by the periodic check ...
But there isn't a hard and fast rule in that section on random monsters, and it refers you to your own table/chart in that passage as well. Which implies that you may be best served by making your own chart and periodicity, but it does not require it.
The 1e AD&D DMG is as usual, not going to give you a hard and fast rule. Don't let that be an obstacle to play. Throughout the 1e AD&D DMG, the author expends a significant amount of text providing the following guidance to the DM that I'll distill into a simple principle: do as you will, you are the DM.
And it works. (Well, it worked for me for some years when I was running and playing in AD&D 1e dungeons).
Alternative Answer: Once per turn, roll a 1d6
A lot of AD&D was written with the core assumptions of playing Original D&D (three little books in a box, 1974) as an embedded assumption. In Volume III, Wilderness and Underworld adventures, on page 10, it says this:
Wandering Monsters: At the end of every turn the referee will roll a six-sided die and see if a wandering monster has been encountered. A roll of 6 indicates a wandering monster has appeared.
Experience
In all honesty, for the first five years that I played D&D and AD&D (1975-1981) that was "normal" in a lot of the dungeon crawls I participated in. The OD&D bled into AD&D almost seamlessly in a lot of cases.
Using wandering monsters as a way to "move things along"
None of the above precludes using a check for random monsters whenever you feel that it is appropriate. With published adventures, some have a guide on random monster checks, and some don't.
answered 5 hours ago
KorvinStarmastKorvinStarmast
90.8k22 gold badges300 silver badges487 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Falling back on OD&D and the classic 1 in 6 per turn is the conclusion I came to as well, with the same reasoning.
$endgroup$
– SevenSidedDie
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152140%2fis-there-a-standard-frequency-for-wandering-monster-checks-in-a-dungeon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Every three turns, unless the DM decides otherwise
This answer presumes that the only material you are using as a reference are the PHB, MM and DMG.
How did I come up with that answer? (I hear people wonder) The 1e DMG is, as you pointed out in a comment, organized in a counter intuitive fashion.
You'll find on page 190 of the DMG under City encounters the following text.
Check for encounters every three turns as normally, or otherwise as desired.
Where was the 'normally' covered? Nowhere, though "once per turn" was "normally" for the original game (see below). Walking back to 'keeping track of time' on page 38, we find:
It is essential that an accurate time record be kept so that the DM can determine when to check for wandering monsters, and in order to keep a strict check on the duration of some spells ... On occasion a party may wish to hole up for a long period perhaps over night ... this does not exempt them from occasional checks for wandering monsters, though the frequency may be moderated somewhat, depending on conditions ...
Maddeningly, for those looking for a concrete answer, a periodicity was implied on page 174 ...
When a random encounter is indicated by the periodic check ...
But there isn't a hard and fast rule in that section on random monsters, and it refers you to your own table/chart in that passage as well. Which implies that you may be best served by making your own chart and periodicity, but it does not require it.
The 1e AD&D DMG is as usual, not going to give you a hard and fast rule. Don't let that be an obstacle to play. Throughout the 1e AD&D DMG, the author expends a significant amount of text providing the following guidance to the DM that I'll distill into a simple principle: do as you will, you are the DM.
And it works. (Well, it worked for me for some years when I was running and playing in AD&D 1e dungeons).
Alternative Answer: Once per turn, roll a 1d6
A lot of AD&D was written with the core assumptions of playing Original D&D (three little books in a box, 1974) as an embedded assumption. In Volume III, Wilderness and Underworld adventures, on page 10, it says this:
Wandering Monsters: At the end of every turn the referee will roll a six-sided die and see if a wandering monster has been encountered. A roll of 6 indicates a wandering monster has appeared.
Experience
In all honesty, for the first five years that I played D&D and AD&D (1975-1981) that was "normal" in a lot of the dungeon crawls I participated in. The OD&D bled into AD&D almost seamlessly in a lot of cases.
Using wandering monsters as a way to "move things along"
None of the above precludes using a check for random monsters whenever you feel that it is appropriate. With published adventures, some have a guide on random monster checks, and some don't.
answered 5 hours ago
KorvinStarmastKorvinStarmast
90.8k22 gold badges300 silver badges487 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Falling back on OD&D and the classic 1 in 6 per turn is the conclusion I came to as well, with the same reasoning.
$endgroup$
– SevenSidedDie
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Every three turns, unless the DM decides otherwise
This answer presumes that the only material you are using as a reference are the PHB, MM and DMG.
How did I come up with that answer? (I hear people wonder) The 1e DMG is, as you pointed out in a comment, organized in a counter intuitive fashion.
You'll find on page 190 of the DMG under City encounters the following text.
Check for encounters every three turns as normally, or otherwise as desired.
Where was the 'normally' covered? Nowhere, though "once per turn" was "normally" for the original game (see below). Walking back to 'keeping track of time' on page 38, we find:
It is essential that an accurate time record be kept so that the DM can determine when to check for wandering monsters, and in order to keep a strict check on the duration of some spells ... On occasion a party may wish to hole up for a long period perhaps over night ... this does not exempt them from occasional checks for wandering monsters, though the frequency may be moderated somewhat, depending on conditions ...
Maddeningly, for those looking for a concrete answer, a periodicity was implied on page 174 ...
When a random encounter is indicated by the periodic check ...
But there isn't a hard and fast rule in that section on random monsters, and it refers you to your own table/chart in that passage as well. Which implies that you may be best served by making your own chart and periodicity, but it does not require it.
The 1e AD&D DMG is as usual, not going to give you a hard and fast rule. Don't let that be an obstacle to play. Throughout the 1e AD&D DMG, the author expends a significant amount of text providing the following guidance to the DM that I'll distill into a simple principle: do as you will, you are the DM.
And it works. (Well, it worked for me for some years when I was running and playing in AD&D 1e dungeons).
Alternative Answer: Once per turn, roll a 1d6
A lot of AD&D was written with the core assumptions of playing Original D&D (three little books in a box, 1974) as an embedded assumption. In Volume III, Wilderness and Underworld adventures, on page 10, it says this:
Wandering Monsters: At the end of every turn the referee will roll a six-sided die and see if a wandering monster has been encountered. A roll of 6 indicates a wandering monster has appeared.
Experience
In all honesty, for the first five years that I played D&D and AD&D (1975-1981) that was "normal" in a lot of the dungeon crawls I participated in. The OD&D bled into AD&D almost seamlessly in a lot of cases.
Using wandering monsters as a way to "move things along"
None of the above precludes using a check for random monsters whenever you feel that it is appropriate. With published adventures, some have a guide on random monster checks, and some don't.
answered 5 hours ago
KorvinStarmastKorvinStarmast
90.8k22 gold badges300 silver badges487 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Falling back on OD&D and the classic 1 in 6 per turn is the conclusion I came to as well, with the same reasoning.
$endgroup$
– SevenSidedDie
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Every three turns, unless the DM decides otherwise
This answer presumes that the only material you are using as a reference are the PHB, MM and DMG.
How did I come up with that answer? (I hear people wonder) The 1e DMG is, as you pointed out in a comment, organized in a counter intuitive fashion.
You'll find on page 190 of the DMG under City encounters the following text.
Check for encounters every three turns as normally, or otherwise as desired.
Where was the 'normally' covered? Nowhere, though "once per turn" was "normally" for the original game (see below). Walking back to 'keeping track of time' on page 38, we find:
It is essential that an accurate time record be kept so that the DM can determine when to check for wandering monsters, and in order to keep a strict check on the duration of some spells ... On occasion a party may wish to hole up for a long period perhaps over night ... this does not exempt them from occasional checks for wandering monsters, though the frequency may be moderated somewhat, depending on conditions ...
Maddeningly, for those looking for a concrete answer, a periodicity was implied on page 174 ...
When a random encounter is indicated by the periodic check ...
But there isn't a hard and fast rule in that section on random monsters, and it refers you to your own table/chart in that passage as well. Which implies that you may be best served by making your own chart and periodicity, but it does not require it.
The 1e AD&D DMG is as usual, not going to give you a hard and fast rule. Don't let that be an obstacle to play. Throughout the 1e AD&D DMG, the author expends a significant amount of text providing the following guidance to the DM that I'll distill into a simple principle: do as you will, you are the DM.
And it works. (Well, it worked for me for some years when I was running and playing in AD&D 1e dungeons).
Alternative Answer: Once per turn, roll a 1d6
A lot of AD&D was written with the core assumptions of playing Original D&D (three little books in a box, 1974) as an embedded assumption. In Volume III, Wilderness and Underworld adventures, on page 10, it says this:
Wandering Monsters: At the end of every turn the referee will roll a six-sided die and see if a wandering monster has been encountered. A roll of 6 indicates a wandering monster has appeared.
Experience
In all honesty, for the first five years that I played D&D and AD&D (1975-1981) that was "normal" in a lot of the dungeon crawls I participated in. The OD&D bled into AD&D almost seamlessly in a lot of cases.
Using wandering monsters as a way to "move things along"
None of the above precludes using a check for random monsters whenever you feel that it is appropriate. With published adventures, some have a guide on random monster checks, and some don't.
answered 5 hours ago
KorvinStarmastKorvinStarmast
90.8k22 gold badges300 silver badges487 bronze badges
$endgroup$
Every three turns, unless the DM decides otherwise
This answer presumes that the only material you are using as a reference are the PHB, MM and DMG.
How did I come up with that answer? (I hear people wonder) The 1e DMG is, as you pointed out in a comment, organized in a counter intuitive fashion.
You'll find on page 190 of the DMG under City encounters the following text.
Check for encounters every three turns as normally, or otherwise as desired.
Where was the 'normally' covered? Nowhere, though "once per turn" was "normally" for the original game (see below). Walking back to 'keeping track of time' on page 38, we find:
It is essential that an accurate time record be kept so that the DM can determine when to check for wandering monsters, and in order to keep a strict check on the duration of some spells ... On occasion a party may wish to hole up for a long period perhaps over night ... this does not exempt them from occasional checks for wandering monsters, though the frequency may be moderated somewhat, depending on conditions ...
Maddeningly, for those looking for a concrete answer, a periodicity was implied on page 174 ...
When a random encounter is indicated by the periodic check ...
But there isn't a hard and fast rule in that section on random monsters, and it refers you to your own table/chart in that passage as well. Which implies that you may be best served by making your own chart and periodicity, but it does not require it.
The 1e AD&D DMG is as usual, not going to give you a hard and fast rule. Don't let that be an obstacle to play. Throughout the 1e AD&D DMG, the author expends a significant amount of text providing the following guidance to the DM that I'll distill into a simple principle: do as you will, you are the DM.
And it works. (Well, it worked for me for some years when I was running and playing in AD&D 1e dungeons).
Alternative Answer: Once per turn, roll a 1d6
A lot of AD&D was written with the core assumptions of playing Original D&D (three little books in a box, 1974) as an embedded assumption. In Volume III, Wilderness and Underworld adventures, on page 10, it says this:
Wandering Monsters: At the end of every turn the referee will roll a six-sided die and see if a wandering monster has been encountered. A roll of 6 indicates a wandering monster has appeared.
Experience
In all honesty, for the first five years that I played D&D and AD&D (1975-1981) that was "normal" in a lot of the dungeon crawls I participated in. The OD&D bled into AD&D almost seamlessly in a lot of cases.
Using wandering monsters as a way to "move things along"
None of the above precludes using a check for random monsters whenever you feel that it is appropriate. With published adventures, some have a guide on random monster checks, and some don't.
answered 5 hours ago
KorvinStarmastKorvinStarmast
90.8k22 gold badges300 silver badges487 bronze badges
edited 4 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
KorvinStarmastKorvinStarmast
90.8k22 gold badges300 silver badges487 bronze badges
answered 5 hours ago
KorvinStarmastKorvinStarmast
90.8k22 gold badges300 silver badges487 bronze badges
answered 5 hours ago
KorvinStarmastKorvinStarmast
90.8k22 gold badges300 silver badges487 bronze badges
90.8k22 gold badges300 silver badges487 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Falling back on OD&D and the classic 1 in 6 per turn is the conclusion I came to as well, with the same reasoning.
$endgroup$
– SevenSidedDie
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Falling back on OD&D and the classic 1 in 6 per turn is the conclusion I came to as well, with the same reasoning.
$endgroup$
– SevenSidedDie
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Falling back on OD&D and the classic 1 in 6 per turn is the conclusion I came to as well, with the same reasoning.
$endgroup$
– SevenSidedDie
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Falling back on OD&D and the classic 1 in 6 per turn is the conclusion I came to as well, with the same reasoning.
$endgroup$
– SevenSidedDie
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152140%2fis-there-a-standard-frequency-for-wandering-monster-checks-in-a-dungeon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
Yes, I really am playing the ‘77 edition, hence the tag. There are three books in question and if you’ve read them you’d know they’re not known for their stellar organization.
$endgroup$
– munk
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Having spent the last few hours off and on trying and failing to track this down, I'm pretty eager to see an answer.
$endgroup$
– SevenSidedDie
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SevenSidedDie I think I've found it (but it relies on OD&D also ...)
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
5 hours ago