Can a creature sustain itself by eating its own severed body parts?Best kind of creature to be capable of biologically spawning an 'ecosystem' with borrowed organic tissues?Xenobiology of extraterrestrial parasitic superorganismHow can a ninetails shape-shift in a more natural illusionary way without magic or supernatural stuff?The plausibility of a mind-controlling and genome-altering pentastomidHow could magic theoretically alter flora/fauna?Optimal species body plan for agility in a complex environmentAn animal that is physically separated into multiple partsFull-body bioluminescenceHow can an organ that provides biological immortality be unable to regenerate?What could justify an animal photosynthesis?

Is "repository" pronounced /rɪˈpɒzɪt(ə)ri/ or ri-ˈpä-zə-ˌtȯr-ē or /rəˈpäzəˌtôrē/?

When a ball on a rope swings in a circle, is there both centripetal force and tension force?

Parser for STL stereolithography data files

Linux ext4 restore file and directory access rights after bad backup/restore

To what extent does asymmetric cryptography secure bitcoin transactions?

Function over a list that depends on the index

Why teach C using scanf without talking about command line arguments?

What's a German word for »Sandbagger«?

Does the Bracer of Flying Daggers really let a thief make 4 attacks per round?

How to belay quickly ascending top-rope climbers?

How to get a type of "screech" on guitar

Dative single noun Bankautomaten?

I want light controlled by one switch, not two

Could Europeans in Europe demand protection under UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples?

How to tell readers that I know my story is factually incorrect?

How was Luke's prosthetic hand in Episode V filmed?

How to not confuse readers with simultaneous events?

Deleting a point in METAFONT

You have no, but can try for yes

Extract the attribute names from a large number of Shapefiles

Does a hash function have a Upper bound on input length?

What is a Romeo Word™?

Why should fork() have been designed to return a file descriptor?

How do you name this compound using IUPAC system (including steps)?



Can a creature sustain itself by eating its own severed body parts?


Best kind of creature to be capable of biologically spawning an 'ecosystem' with borrowed organic tissues?Xenobiology of extraterrestrial parasitic superorganismHow can a ninetails shape-shift in a more natural illusionary way without magic or supernatural stuff?The plausibility of a mind-controlling and genome-altering pentastomidHow could magic theoretically alter flora/fauna?Optimal species body plan for agility in a complex environmentAn animal that is physically separated into multiple partsFull-body bioluminescenceHow can an organ that provides biological immortality be unable to regenerate?What could justify an animal photosynthesis?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1












$begingroup$


I was inspired by geckos which can sever their own tails.



I wonder if a creature which has such an ability, especially with a high regenerative power to grow its body parts, can sustain itself over and over by only eating its own body parts, rather than as distraction like geckos do.



It may not make it full, or allow it to do many activities, but I hope at least it is enough to keep this creature alive.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Ewwww...on several levels.
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    This is the first proposal I've heard for a biological Perpetuum Mobile. The laws of thermodynamics not your fried here.
    $endgroup$
    – TheDyingOfLight
    8 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A starving population of intelligent beings, like at Tarsus IV, with sufficient medical care available, could delay mass deaths by cutting off some body parts from persons and feeding edible parts of those body parts, along with any other food available, to the amputated persons and other persons. This might delay for a time the moment when people start to die, possibly for the critical time necessary to end the famine, and thus might be ethically mandatory. But emotionally it still seems very icky.
    $endgroup$
    – M. A. Golding
    7 hours ago


















1












$begingroup$


I was inspired by geckos which can sever their own tails.



I wonder if a creature which has such an ability, especially with a high regenerative power to grow its body parts, can sustain itself over and over by only eating its own body parts, rather than as distraction like geckos do.



It may not make it full, or allow it to do many activities, but I hope at least it is enough to keep this creature alive.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Ewwww...on several levels.
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    This is the first proposal I've heard for a biological Perpetuum Mobile. The laws of thermodynamics not your fried here.
    $endgroup$
    – TheDyingOfLight
    8 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A starving population of intelligent beings, like at Tarsus IV, with sufficient medical care available, could delay mass deaths by cutting off some body parts from persons and feeding edible parts of those body parts, along with any other food available, to the amputated persons and other persons. This might delay for a time the moment when people start to die, possibly for the critical time necessary to end the famine, and thus might be ethically mandatory. But emotionally it still seems very icky.
    $endgroup$
    – M. A. Golding
    7 hours ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I was inspired by geckos which can sever their own tails.



I wonder if a creature which has such an ability, especially with a high regenerative power to grow its body parts, can sustain itself over and over by only eating its own body parts, rather than as distraction like geckos do.



It may not make it full, or allow it to do many activities, but I hope at least it is enough to keep this creature alive.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I was inspired by geckos which can sever their own tails.



I wonder if a creature which has such an ability, especially with a high regenerative power to grow its body parts, can sustain itself over and over by only eating its own body parts, rather than as distraction like geckos do.



It may not make it full, or allow it to do many activities, but I hope at least it is enough to keep this creature alive.







biology fauna food






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









Cyn

17.1k2 gold badges35 silver badges76 bronze badges




17.1k2 gold badges35 silver badges76 bronze badges










asked 8 hours ago









Li JunLi Jun

4823 silver badges20 bronze badges




4823 silver badges20 bronze badges







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Ewwww...on several levels.
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    This is the first proposal I've heard for a biological Perpetuum Mobile. The laws of thermodynamics not your fried here.
    $endgroup$
    – TheDyingOfLight
    8 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A starving population of intelligent beings, like at Tarsus IV, with sufficient medical care available, could delay mass deaths by cutting off some body parts from persons and feeding edible parts of those body parts, along with any other food available, to the amputated persons and other persons. This might delay for a time the moment when people start to die, possibly for the critical time necessary to end the famine, and thus might be ethically mandatory. But emotionally it still seems very icky.
    $endgroup$
    – M. A. Golding
    7 hours ago













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Ewwww...on several levels.
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    This is the first proposal I've heard for a biological Perpetuum Mobile. The laws of thermodynamics not your fried here.
    $endgroup$
    – TheDyingOfLight
    8 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A starving population of intelligent beings, like at Tarsus IV, with sufficient medical care available, could delay mass deaths by cutting off some body parts from persons and feeding edible parts of those body parts, along with any other food available, to the amputated persons and other persons. This might delay for a time the moment when people start to die, possibly for the critical time necessary to end the famine, and thus might be ethically mandatory. But emotionally it still seems very icky.
    $endgroup$
    – M. A. Golding
    7 hours ago








3




3




$begingroup$
Ewwww...on several levels.
$endgroup$
– user535733
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Ewwww...on several levels.
$endgroup$
– user535733
8 hours ago




3




3




$begingroup$
This is the first proposal I've heard for a biological Perpetuum Mobile. The laws of thermodynamics not your fried here.
$endgroup$
– TheDyingOfLight
8 hours ago





$begingroup$
This is the first proposal I've heard for a biological Perpetuum Mobile. The laws of thermodynamics not your fried here.
$endgroup$
– TheDyingOfLight
8 hours ago





1




1




$begingroup$
A starving population of intelligent beings, like at Tarsus IV, with sufficient medical care available, could delay mass deaths by cutting off some body parts from persons and feeding edible parts of those body parts, along with any other food available, to the amputated persons and other persons. This might delay for a time the moment when people start to die, possibly for the critical time necessary to end the famine, and thus might be ethically mandatory. But emotionally it still seems very icky.
$endgroup$
– M. A. Golding
7 hours ago





$begingroup$
A starving population of intelligent beings, like at Tarsus IV, with sufficient medical care available, could delay mass deaths by cutting off some body parts from persons and feeding edible parts of those body parts, along with any other food available, to the amputated persons and other persons. This might delay for a time the moment when people start to die, possibly for the critical time necessary to end the famine, and thus might be ethically mandatory. But emotionally it still seems very icky.
$endgroup$
– M. A. Golding
7 hours ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

No.



To regenerate requires more energy than the part itself will supply.



To eat the part you have to break it down chemically and then those chemicals are transported through the body and recombined to make new cells.



All of that requires energy.



You started with a severed limb. It cost you energy to digest it and for your body to "build" a new limb from the digested materials.



To get that energy requires you eat something else (or grow limbs that are smaller and smaller each time). Some of what you eat has to be used to process what you eat.



You'll also expend energy severing the limb, healing the wound, preventing and possibly even fighting infection and just staying alive while the very slow process of limb regrowth happens.



This is why, I suspect, regrowing limbs isn't generally used as a survival adaptation in the evolution of creatures. Animals that lose significant parts of their bodies (in nature, without hospitals and medical care) have a higher risk of infection, disease and death not to mention more vulnerability to attack while lacking a complete set of components. It's a generally survival adaption because, mostly, they're less likely to survive, not more likely.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    It depends on how you define the regenerative power.



    If the regenerative power is similar to that of Werewolves, Trolls and that kind of magic regeneration then yes, he could. These types of regeneration rarely take into account Newton's laws and will generate matter and energy on the fly. So if the creature eats its own limbs and regenerates them for "free" then he could easily get his daily food intake.



    If the creature has to generate them out of the energy he eats he's going to be dead after the first time he lobs off an appendage. Healing wounds and accelerated growth is one of the most energy intensive things your body can do. That single arm would barely regenerate your arm because of all the energy and material lost on just homeostasis of your body and the digestion and transport throughout your body.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      2












      $begingroup$

      The short answer is: Yes with magic, no without magic.



      Wouldn't you rather have a magical bowl that is always full with fresh nutritious food, perfectly matched to the species that approaches it?



      A lot less disgusting and utterly painful for that poor creature. And the magic is the same, or perhaps less.



      You need a lot of energy or magic or power to regenerate a body part, and that's in part because it isn't just meat, it's a functional part of the body with nerves and blood vessels and more.



      Creating basic food shouldn't be nearly as hard. But it still requires magic or some sort of power source (which can be the sun) to create the food or at least magic or work to harvest and prepare the food to put in the bowl.



      It's the same idea. Without magic, you don't get something for free (even with magic there are often limits; it depends on how you set up your magical system).



      When geckos sever their tails (for quick getaways from danger) they have to spend a lot of energy to grow them back. Even if they return and eat them, they're not getting anywhere near the calories it takes to regenerate.



      Remember, it takes calories to digest food. It's like taking out a loan to pay back previous loans. There's interest on the money you owe and you simply can not sustain the process.



      Nor do all the calories you need for regeneration go to edible flesh. There's just too much else you need there. Only a fraction of the energy it takes to grow a body part becomes stored calories in the body part itself.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "579"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f151309%2fcan-a-creature-sustain-itself-by-eating-its-own-severed-body-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        7












        $begingroup$

        No.



        To regenerate requires more energy than the part itself will supply.



        To eat the part you have to break it down chemically and then those chemicals are transported through the body and recombined to make new cells.



        All of that requires energy.



        You started with a severed limb. It cost you energy to digest it and for your body to "build" a new limb from the digested materials.



        To get that energy requires you eat something else (or grow limbs that are smaller and smaller each time). Some of what you eat has to be used to process what you eat.



        You'll also expend energy severing the limb, healing the wound, preventing and possibly even fighting infection and just staying alive while the very slow process of limb regrowth happens.



        This is why, I suspect, regrowing limbs isn't generally used as a survival adaptation in the evolution of creatures. Animals that lose significant parts of their bodies (in nature, without hospitals and medical care) have a higher risk of infection, disease and death not to mention more vulnerability to attack while lacking a complete set of components. It's a generally survival adaption because, mostly, they're less likely to survive, not more likely.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$

















          7












          $begingroup$

          No.



          To regenerate requires more energy than the part itself will supply.



          To eat the part you have to break it down chemically and then those chemicals are transported through the body and recombined to make new cells.



          All of that requires energy.



          You started with a severed limb. It cost you energy to digest it and for your body to "build" a new limb from the digested materials.



          To get that energy requires you eat something else (or grow limbs that are smaller and smaller each time). Some of what you eat has to be used to process what you eat.



          You'll also expend energy severing the limb, healing the wound, preventing and possibly even fighting infection and just staying alive while the very slow process of limb regrowth happens.



          This is why, I suspect, regrowing limbs isn't generally used as a survival adaptation in the evolution of creatures. Animals that lose significant parts of their bodies (in nature, without hospitals and medical care) have a higher risk of infection, disease and death not to mention more vulnerability to attack while lacking a complete set of components. It's a generally survival adaption because, mostly, they're less likely to survive, not more likely.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$















            7












            7








            7





            $begingroup$

            No.



            To regenerate requires more energy than the part itself will supply.



            To eat the part you have to break it down chemically and then those chemicals are transported through the body and recombined to make new cells.



            All of that requires energy.



            You started with a severed limb. It cost you energy to digest it and for your body to "build" a new limb from the digested materials.



            To get that energy requires you eat something else (or grow limbs that are smaller and smaller each time). Some of what you eat has to be used to process what you eat.



            You'll also expend energy severing the limb, healing the wound, preventing and possibly even fighting infection and just staying alive while the very slow process of limb regrowth happens.



            This is why, I suspect, regrowing limbs isn't generally used as a survival adaptation in the evolution of creatures. Animals that lose significant parts of their bodies (in nature, without hospitals and medical care) have a higher risk of infection, disease and death not to mention more vulnerability to attack while lacking a complete set of components. It's a generally survival adaption because, mostly, they're less likely to survive, not more likely.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            No.



            To regenerate requires more energy than the part itself will supply.



            To eat the part you have to break it down chemically and then those chemicals are transported through the body and recombined to make new cells.



            All of that requires energy.



            You started with a severed limb. It cost you energy to digest it and for your body to "build" a new limb from the digested materials.



            To get that energy requires you eat something else (or grow limbs that are smaller and smaller each time). Some of what you eat has to be used to process what you eat.



            You'll also expend energy severing the limb, healing the wound, preventing and possibly even fighting infection and just staying alive while the very slow process of limb regrowth happens.



            This is why, I suspect, regrowing limbs isn't generally used as a survival adaptation in the evolution of creatures. Animals that lose significant parts of their bodies (in nature, without hospitals and medical care) have a higher risk of infection, disease and death not to mention more vulnerability to attack while lacking a complete set of components. It's a generally survival adaption because, mostly, they're less likely to survive, not more likely.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 6 hours ago









            Brythan

            23k9 gold badges46 silver badges90 bronze badges




            23k9 gold badges46 silver badges90 bronze badges










            answered 8 hours ago









            StephenGStephenG

            16.9k8 gold badges26 silver badges60 bronze badges




            16.9k8 gold badges26 silver badges60 bronze badges























                3












                $begingroup$

                It depends on how you define the regenerative power.



                If the regenerative power is similar to that of Werewolves, Trolls and that kind of magic regeneration then yes, he could. These types of regeneration rarely take into account Newton's laws and will generate matter and energy on the fly. So if the creature eats its own limbs and regenerates them for "free" then he could easily get his daily food intake.



                If the creature has to generate them out of the energy he eats he's going to be dead after the first time he lobs off an appendage. Healing wounds and accelerated growth is one of the most energy intensive things your body can do. That single arm would barely regenerate your arm because of all the energy and material lost on just homeostasis of your body and the digestion and transport throughout your body.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  3












                  $begingroup$

                  It depends on how you define the regenerative power.



                  If the regenerative power is similar to that of Werewolves, Trolls and that kind of magic regeneration then yes, he could. These types of regeneration rarely take into account Newton's laws and will generate matter and energy on the fly. So if the creature eats its own limbs and regenerates them for "free" then he could easily get his daily food intake.



                  If the creature has to generate them out of the energy he eats he's going to be dead after the first time he lobs off an appendage. Healing wounds and accelerated growth is one of the most energy intensive things your body can do. That single arm would barely regenerate your arm because of all the energy and material lost on just homeostasis of your body and the digestion and transport throughout your body.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$















                    3












                    3








                    3





                    $begingroup$

                    It depends on how you define the regenerative power.



                    If the regenerative power is similar to that of Werewolves, Trolls and that kind of magic regeneration then yes, he could. These types of regeneration rarely take into account Newton's laws and will generate matter and energy on the fly. So if the creature eats its own limbs and regenerates them for "free" then he could easily get his daily food intake.



                    If the creature has to generate them out of the energy he eats he's going to be dead after the first time he lobs off an appendage. Healing wounds and accelerated growth is one of the most energy intensive things your body can do. That single arm would barely regenerate your arm because of all the energy and material lost on just homeostasis of your body and the digestion and transport throughout your body.






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    It depends on how you define the regenerative power.



                    If the regenerative power is similar to that of Werewolves, Trolls and that kind of magic regeneration then yes, he could. These types of regeneration rarely take into account Newton's laws and will generate matter and energy on the fly. So if the creature eats its own limbs and regenerates them for "free" then he could easily get his daily food intake.



                    If the creature has to generate them out of the energy he eats he's going to be dead after the first time he lobs off an appendage. Healing wounds and accelerated growth is one of the most energy intensive things your body can do. That single arm would barely regenerate your arm because of all the energy and material lost on just homeostasis of your body and the digestion and transport throughout your body.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 6 hours ago









                    Brythan

                    23k9 gold badges46 silver badges90 bronze badges




                    23k9 gold badges46 silver badges90 bronze badges










                    answered 8 hours ago









                    DemiganDemigan

                    12.6k1 gold badge12 silver badges59 bronze badges




                    12.6k1 gold badge12 silver badges59 bronze badges





















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        The short answer is: Yes with magic, no without magic.



                        Wouldn't you rather have a magical bowl that is always full with fresh nutritious food, perfectly matched to the species that approaches it?



                        A lot less disgusting and utterly painful for that poor creature. And the magic is the same, or perhaps less.



                        You need a lot of energy or magic or power to regenerate a body part, and that's in part because it isn't just meat, it's a functional part of the body with nerves and blood vessels and more.



                        Creating basic food shouldn't be nearly as hard. But it still requires magic or some sort of power source (which can be the sun) to create the food or at least magic or work to harvest and prepare the food to put in the bowl.



                        It's the same idea. Without magic, you don't get something for free (even with magic there are often limits; it depends on how you set up your magical system).



                        When geckos sever their tails (for quick getaways from danger) they have to spend a lot of energy to grow them back. Even if they return and eat them, they're not getting anywhere near the calories it takes to regenerate.



                        Remember, it takes calories to digest food. It's like taking out a loan to pay back previous loans. There's interest on the money you owe and you simply can not sustain the process.



                        Nor do all the calories you need for regeneration go to edible flesh. There's just too much else you need there. Only a fraction of the energy it takes to grow a body part becomes stored calories in the body part itself.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          The short answer is: Yes with magic, no without magic.



                          Wouldn't you rather have a magical bowl that is always full with fresh nutritious food, perfectly matched to the species that approaches it?



                          A lot less disgusting and utterly painful for that poor creature. And the magic is the same, or perhaps less.



                          You need a lot of energy or magic or power to regenerate a body part, and that's in part because it isn't just meat, it's a functional part of the body with nerves and blood vessels and more.



                          Creating basic food shouldn't be nearly as hard. But it still requires magic or some sort of power source (which can be the sun) to create the food or at least magic or work to harvest and prepare the food to put in the bowl.



                          It's the same idea. Without magic, you don't get something for free (even with magic there are often limits; it depends on how you set up your magical system).



                          When geckos sever their tails (for quick getaways from danger) they have to spend a lot of energy to grow them back. Even if they return and eat them, they're not getting anywhere near the calories it takes to regenerate.



                          Remember, it takes calories to digest food. It's like taking out a loan to pay back previous loans. There's interest on the money you owe and you simply can not sustain the process.



                          Nor do all the calories you need for regeneration go to edible flesh. There's just too much else you need there. Only a fraction of the energy it takes to grow a body part becomes stored calories in the body part itself.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            2












                            2








                            2





                            $begingroup$

                            The short answer is: Yes with magic, no without magic.



                            Wouldn't you rather have a magical bowl that is always full with fresh nutritious food, perfectly matched to the species that approaches it?



                            A lot less disgusting and utterly painful for that poor creature. And the magic is the same, or perhaps less.



                            You need a lot of energy or magic or power to regenerate a body part, and that's in part because it isn't just meat, it's a functional part of the body with nerves and blood vessels and more.



                            Creating basic food shouldn't be nearly as hard. But it still requires magic or some sort of power source (which can be the sun) to create the food or at least magic or work to harvest and prepare the food to put in the bowl.



                            It's the same idea. Without magic, you don't get something for free (even with magic there are often limits; it depends on how you set up your magical system).



                            When geckos sever their tails (for quick getaways from danger) they have to spend a lot of energy to grow them back. Even if they return and eat them, they're not getting anywhere near the calories it takes to regenerate.



                            Remember, it takes calories to digest food. It's like taking out a loan to pay back previous loans. There's interest on the money you owe and you simply can not sustain the process.



                            Nor do all the calories you need for regeneration go to edible flesh. There's just too much else you need there. Only a fraction of the energy it takes to grow a body part becomes stored calories in the body part itself.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            The short answer is: Yes with magic, no without magic.



                            Wouldn't you rather have a magical bowl that is always full with fresh nutritious food, perfectly matched to the species that approaches it?



                            A lot less disgusting and utterly painful for that poor creature. And the magic is the same, or perhaps less.



                            You need a lot of energy or magic or power to regenerate a body part, and that's in part because it isn't just meat, it's a functional part of the body with nerves and blood vessels and more.



                            Creating basic food shouldn't be nearly as hard. But it still requires magic or some sort of power source (which can be the sun) to create the food or at least magic or work to harvest and prepare the food to put in the bowl.



                            It's the same idea. Without magic, you don't get something for free (even with magic there are often limits; it depends on how you set up your magical system).



                            When geckos sever their tails (for quick getaways from danger) they have to spend a lot of energy to grow them back. Even if they return and eat them, they're not getting anywhere near the calories it takes to regenerate.



                            Remember, it takes calories to digest food. It's like taking out a loan to pay back previous loans. There's interest on the money you owe and you simply can not sustain the process.



                            Nor do all the calories you need for regeneration go to edible flesh. There's just too much else you need there. Only a fraction of the energy it takes to grow a body part becomes stored calories in the body part itself.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 7 hours ago









                            CynCyn

                            17.1k2 gold badges35 silver badges76 bronze badges




                            17.1k2 gold badges35 silver badges76 bronze badges



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f151309%2fcan-a-creature-sustain-itself-by-eating-its-own-severed-body-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                                Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                                199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單