3D-Plot with an inequality condition for parameter valuesPlotting a function only non-zero for discrete values of argumentPlotting double inequality only for integer valuesPlot the result of NIntegrate for different parameter values(Naive) Manual implementation of DFT results in long sum which is very inefficient to plot, can my approach be saved?3D plot from listsPlotting for various parameter values with single code3D-Plot optimization results for varying parameter valuesListPlot3D for optimization with varying parameter values3D Plot maximization results with varying parameter values3D Plot multiple maximization results in one same diagram

How to fit a linear model in the Bayesian way in Mathematica?

Will it hurt my career to work as a graphic designer in a startup for beauty and skin care?

How would you write do the dialogues of two characters talking in a chat room?

Why is dry soil hydrophobic? Bad gardener paradox

Won 50K! Now what should I do with it

Adding a vertical line at the right end of the horizontal line in frac

Are lithium batteries allowed in the International Space Station?

What exactly is the Tension force?

Why do they not say "The Baby"

Is this a Lost Mine of Phandelver Plot Hole?

School House Points (Python + SQLite)

Add region constraint to Graphics

What are some symbols representing peasants/oppressed persons fighting back?

Mistakenly modified `/bin/sh'

How to determine port and starboard on a rotating wheel space station?

Concatenation using + and += operator in Python

Why is the collector feedback bias popular in electret-mic preamp circuits?

Integral clarification

Book or series about stones and a magician named Gwydion

Did the Shuttle's rudder or elevons operate when flown on its carrier 747?

What caused Windows ME's terrible reputation?

Why doesn't Anakin's lightsaber explode when it's chopped in half on Geonosis?

Do native speakers use ZVE or CPU?

Are L-functions uniquely determined by their values at negative integers?



3D-Plot with an inequality condition for parameter values


Plotting a function only non-zero for discrete values of argumentPlotting double inequality only for integer valuesPlot the result of NIntegrate for different parameter values(Naive) Manual implementation of DFT results in long sum which is very inefficient to plot, can my approach be saved?3D plot from listsPlotting for various parameter values with single code3D-Plot optimization results for varying parameter valuesListPlot3D for optimization with varying parameter values3D Plot maximization results with varying parameter values3D Plot multiple maximization results in one same diagram






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


I'm trying to ListPlot3D the following function



$f=frac-frac(t-1) (d-s) left(2 c d (d (q-1)+s)-s left(-2 d^2+d (s+2)+s^2right)right)2 s^2+d^2-d s-d t+s ts$



against $c in [0,1]$ and $q in [1,2]$ under the conditions of $s=2$, $d=0.8$, $t=0$, $0leq c leq 1$, and $1 leq q leq frac1c$.



I'm struggling with how to reflect the last condition, i.e. $1 leq q leq frac1c$ in my Mathematica code. I used Assumption but didn't work.



Here is the code I tried:



Block[s = 2, d = 0.8, t = 0, f = (d^2 - d s - ((d - s) (2 c d (d (-1 + q) + s) - s (-2 d^2 + s^2 + d (2 + s))) (-1 + t))/(2 s^2) - d t + s t)/s; maxn = Flatten[Table[c, q, f, c, 0, 1, .1, q, 1, 2, .1, Assumptions -> 0 < c <= 1, 1 <= q <= 1/c], 1];] ListPlot3D[maxn, AxesLabel -> "c", "q", "V"]









share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    3












    $begingroup$


    I'm trying to ListPlot3D the following function



    $f=frac-frac(t-1) (d-s) left(2 c d (d (q-1)+s)-s left(-2 d^2+d (s+2)+s^2right)right)2 s^2+d^2-d s-d t+s ts$



    against $c in [0,1]$ and $q in [1,2]$ under the conditions of $s=2$, $d=0.8$, $t=0$, $0leq c leq 1$, and $1 leq q leq frac1c$.



    I'm struggling with how to reflect the last condition, i.e. $1 leq q leq frac1c$ in my Mathematica code. I used Assumption but didn't work.



    Here is the code I tried:



    Block[s = 2, d = 0.8, t = 0, f = (d^2 - d s - ((d - s) (2 c d (d (-1 + q) + s) - s (-2 d^2 + s^2 + d (2 + s))) (-1 + t))/(2 s^2) - d t + s t)/s; maxn = Flatten[Table[c, q, f, c, 0, 1, .1, q, 1, 2, .1, Assumptions -> 0 < c <= 1, 1 <= q <= 1/c], 1];] ListPlot3D[maxn, AxesLabel -> "c", "q", "V"]









    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I'm trying to ListPlot3D the following function



      $f=frac-frac(t-1) (d-s) left(2 c d (d (q-1)+s)-s left(-2 d^2+d (s+2)+s^2right)right)2 s^2+d^2-d s-d t+s ts$



      against $c in [0,1]$ and $q in [1,2]$ under the conditions of $s=2$, $d=0.8$, $t=0$, $0leq c leq 1$, and $1 leq q leq frac1c$.



      I'm struggling with how to reflect the last condition, i.e. $1 leq q leq frac1c$ in my Mathematica code. I used Assumption but didn't work.



      Here is the code I tried:



      Block[s = 2, d = 0.8, t = 0, f = (d^2 - d s - ((d - s) (2 c d (d (-1 + q) + s) - s (-2 d^2 + s^2 + d (2 + s))) (-1 + t))/(2 s^2) - d t + s t)/s; maxn = Flatten[Table[c, q, f, c, 0, 1, .1, q, 1, 2, .1, Assumptions -> 0 < c <= 1, 1 <= q <= 1/c], 1];] ListPlot3D[maxn, AxesLabel -> "c", "q", "V"]









      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I'm trying to ListPlot3D the following function



      $f=frac-frac(t-1) (d-s) left(2 c d (d (q-1)+s)-s left(-2 d^2+d (s+2)+s^2right)right)2 s^2+d^2-d s-d t+s ts$



      against $c in [0,1]$ and $q in [1,2]$ under the conditions of $s=2$, $d=0.8$, $t=0$, $0leq c leq 1$, and $1 leq q leq frac1c$.



      I'm struggling with how to reflect the last condition, i.e. $1 leq q leq frac1c$ in my Mathematica code. I used Assumption but didn't work.



      Here is the code I tried:



      Block[s = 2, d = 0.8, t = 0, f = (d^2 - d s - ((d - s) (2 c d (d (-1 + q) + s) - s (-2 d^2 + s^2 + d (2 + s))) (-1 + t))/(2 s^2) - d t + s t)/s; maxn = Flatten[Table[c, q, f, c, 0, 1, .1, q, 1, 2, .1, Assumptions -> 0 < c <= 1, 1 <= q <= 1/c], 1];] ListPlot3D[maxn, AxesLabel -> "c", "q", "V"]






      plotting






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 8 hours ago







      ppp

















      asked 9 hours ago









      pppppp

      3712 silver badges11 bronze badges




      3712 silver badges11 bronze badges




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Instead of sampling the function yourself, you can use Plot3D.



          expr = Block[s = 2, d = 0.8, t = 0, 
          (d^2 - d s - ((d - s) (2 c d (d (-1 + q) + s) -
          s (-2 d^2 + s^2 + d (2 + s))) (-1 + t))/(2 s^2) - d t + s t)/s
          ];

          Plot3D[expr, c, 0, 1, q, 1, 2,
          PlotPoints -> 50,
          MaxRecursion -> 5,
          RegionFunction ->
          Function[c, q, 1 <= q <= 1/(c + $MinMachineNumber)]
          ]


          enter image description here



          As you can see, the troubling condition can be incorporated by using RegionFunction.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            3












            $begingroup$

            Here's another way: Iterators may depend on iterators that precede them.



            expr = Block[s = 2, d = 0.8, t = 0,
            (d^2 - d s - ((d - s) (2 c d (d (-1 + q) + s) -
            s (-2 d^2 + s^2 + d (2 + s))) (-1 + t))/(2 s^2) - d t + s t)/s];

            Plot3D[expr, c, 0, 1, q, 1, Min[2, 1/(c + $MinMachineNumber)]]


            enter image description here



            This also works, if you don't like fudging with $MinMachineNumber (which doesn't affect the plot at all):



            q2[c_?NumericQ] := Min[2, Quiet@Check[1/c, Infinity]];
            Plot3D[expr, c, 0, 1, q, 1, q2[c]]


            Alternatively, you can special-case zero (the definition for c == 0 must come first):



            ClearAll[q2];
            q2[0 | 0.] := 2;
            q2[c_?NumericQ] := Min[2, 1/c];





            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              I should point out that when the boundary can be specified in this way, a crisp, clean boundary can be computed with much less computational effort than the sampling/interpolation method used in RegionFunction.
              $endgroup$
              – Michael E2
              5 hours ago


















            2












            $begingroup$

            Some of your c are zero and Mathematica complains about testing for 1/c



            So I assume any result 1<=q<=1/0 is acceptable by checking for c==0 first and only if c !=0 do I also check for 1/c



            maxn = Flatten[Table[c, q, f, c, 0, 1, .1, q, 1, 2, .1],1];
            newmaxn=Select[maxn,(1<=#[[2]]&&#[[1]]==0)||1<=#[[2]]<=1/#[[1]]&];
            ListPlot3D[newmaxn]





            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$















              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "387"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202068%2f3d-plot-with-an-inequality-condition-for-parameter-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              4












              $begingroup$

              Instead of sampling the function yourself, you can use Plot3D.



              expr = Block[s = 2, d = 0.8, t = 0, 
              (d^2 - d s - ((d - s) (2 c d (d (-1 + q) + s) -
              s (-2 d^2 + s^2 + d (2 + s))) (-1 + t))/(2 s^2) - d t + s t)/s
              ];

              Plot3D[expr, c, 0, 1, q, 1, 2,
              PlotPoints -> 50,
              MaxRecursion -> 5,
              RegionFunction ->
              Function[c, q, 1 <= q <= 1/(c + $MinMachineNumber)]
              ]


              enter image description here



              As you can see, the troubling condition can be incorporated by using RegionFunction.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                4












                $begingroup$

                Instead of sampling the function yourself, you can use Plot3D.



                expr = Block[s = 2, d = 0.8, t = 0, 
                (d^2 - d s - ((d - s) (2 c d (d (-1 + q) + s) -
                s (-2 d^2 + s^2 + d (2 + s))) (-1 + t))/(2 s^2) - d t + s t)/s
                ];

                Plot3D[expr, c, 0, 1, q, 1, 2,
                PlotPoints -> 50,
                MaxRecursion -> 5,
                RegionFunction ->
                Function[c, q, 1 <= q <= 1/(c + $MinMachineNumber)]
                ]


                enter image description here



                As you can see, the troubling condition can be incorporated by using RegionFunction.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  4












                  4








                  4





                  $begingroup$

                  Instead of sampling the function yourself, you can use Plot3D.



                  expr = Block[s = 2, d = 0.8, t = 0, 
                  (d^2 - d s - ((d - s) (2 c d (d (-1 + q) + s) -
                  s (-2 d^2 + s^2 + d (2 + s))) (-1 + t))/(2 s^2) - d t + s t)/s
                  ];

                  Plot3D[expr, c, 0, 1, q, 1, 2,
                  PlotPoints -> 50,
                  MaxRecursion -> 5,
                  RegionFunction ->
                  Function[c, q, 1 <= q <= 1/(c + $MinMachineNumber)]
                  ]


                  enter image description here



                  As you can see, the troubling condition can be incorporated by using RegionFunction.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Instead of sampling the function yourself, you can use Plot3D.



                  expr = Block[s = 2, d = 0.8, t = 0, 
                  (d^2 - d s - ((d - s) (2 c d (d (-1 + q) + s) -
                  s (-2 d^2 + s^2 + d (2 + s))) (-1 + t))/(2 s^2) - d t + s t)/s
                  ];

                  Plot3D[expr, c, 0, 1, q, 1, 2,
                  PlotPoints -> 50,
                  MaxRecursion -> 5,
                  RegionFunction ->
                  Function[c, q, 1 <= q <= 1/(c + $MinMachineNumber)]
                  ]


                  enter image description here



                  As you can see, the troubling condition can be incorporated by using RegionFunction.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 6 hours ago









                  halirutanhalirutan

                  97.3k6 gold badges227 silver badges424 bronze badges




                  97.3k6 gold badges227 silver badges424 bronze badges























                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      Here's another way: Iterators may depend on iterators that precede them.



                      expr = Block[s = 2, d = 0.8, t = 0,
                      (d^2 - d s - ((d - s) (2 c d (d (-1 + q) + s) -
                      s (-2 d^2 + s^2 + d (2 + s))) (-1 + t))/(2 s^2) - d t + s t)/s];

                      Plot3D[expr, c, 0, 1, q, 1, Min[2, 1/(c + $MinMachineNumber)]]


                      enter image description here



                      This also works, if you don't like fudging with $MinMachineNumber (which doesn't affect the plot at all):



                      q2[c_?NumericQ] := Min[2, Quiet@Check[1/c, Infinity]];
                      Plot3D[expr, c, 0, 1, q, 1, q2[c]]


                      Alternatively, you can special-case zero (the definition for c == 0 must come first):



                      ClearAll[q2];
                      q2[0 | 0.] := 2;
                      q2[c_?NumericQ] := Min[2, 1/c];





                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        I should point out that when the boundary can be specified in this way, a crisp, clean boundary can be computed with much less computational effort than the sampling/interpolation method used in RegionFunction.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Michael E2
                        5 hours ago















                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      Here's another way: Iterators may depend on iterators that precede them.



                      expr = Block[s = 2, d = 0.8, t = 0,
                      (d^2 - d s - ((d - s) (2 c d (d (-1 + q) + s) -
                      s (-2 d^2 + s^2 + d (2 + s))) (-1 + t))/(2 s^2) - d t + s t)/s];

                      Plot3D[expr, c, 0, 1, q, 1, Min[2, 1/(c + $MinMachineNumber)]]


                      enter image description here



                      This also works, if you don't like fudging with $MinMachineNumber (which doesn't affect the plot at all):



                      q2[c_?NumericQ] := Min[2, Quiet@Check[1/c, Infinity]];
                      Plot3D[expr, c, 0, 1, q, 1, q2[c]]


                      Alternatively, you can special-case zero (the definition for c == 0 must come first):



                      ClearAll[q2];
                      q2[0 | 0.] := 2;
                      q2[c_?NumericQ] := Min[2, 1/c];





                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        I should point out that when the boundary can be specified in this way, a crisp, clean boundary can be computed with much less computational effort than the sampling/interpolation method used in RegionFunction.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Michael E2
                        5 hours ago













                      3












                      3








                      3





                      $begingroup$

                      Here's another way: Iterators may depend on iterators that precede them.



                      expr = Block[s = 2, d = 0.8, t = 0,
                      (d^2 - d s - ((d - s) (2 c d (d (-1 + q) + s) -
                      s (-2 d^2 + s^2 + d (2 + s))) (-1 + t))/(2 s^2) - d t + s t)/s];

                      Plot3D[expr, c, 0, 1, q, 1, Min[2, 1/(c + $MinMachineNumber)]]


                      enter image description here



                      This also works, if you don't like fudging with $MinMachineNumber (which doesn't affect the plot at all):



                      q2[c_?NumericQ] := Min[2, Quiet@Check[1/c, Infinity]];
                      Plot3D[expr, c, 0, 1, q, 1, q2[c]]


                      Alternatively, you can special-case zero (the definition for c == 0 must come first):



                      ClearAll[q2];
                      q2[0 | 0.] := 2;
                      q2[c_?NumericQ] := Min[2, 1/c];





                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      Here's another way: Iterators may depend on iterators that precede them.



                      expr = Block[s = 2, d = 0.8, t = 0,
                      (d^2 - d s - ((d - s) (2 c d (d (-1 + q) + s) -
                      s (-2 d^2 + s^2 + d (2 + s))) (-1 + t))/(2 s^2) - d t + s t)/s];

                      Plot3D[expr, c, 0, 1, q, 1, Min[2, 1/(c + $MinMachineNumber)]]


                      enter image description here



                      This also works, if you don't like fudging with $MinMachineNumber (which doesn't affect the plot at all):



                      q2[c_?NumericQ] := Min[2, Quiet@Check[1/c, Infinity]];
                      Plot3D[expr, c, 0, 1, q, 1, q2[c]]


                      Alternatively, you can special-case zero (the definition for c == 0 must come first):



                      ClearAll[q2];
                      q2[0 | 0.] := 2;
                      q2[c_?NumericQ] := Min[2, 1/c];






                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 6 hours ago

























                      answered 6 hours ago









                      Michael E2Michael E2

                      155k12 gold badges214 silver badges505 bronze badges




                      155k12 gold badges214 silver badges505 bronze badges











                      • $begingroup$
                        I should point out that when the boundary can be specified in this way, a crisp, clean boundary can be computed with much less computational effort than the sampling/interpolation method used in RegionFunction.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Michael E2
                        5 hours ago
















                      • $begingroup$
                        I should point out that when the boundary can be specified in this way, a crisp, clean boundary can be computed with much less computational effort than the sampling/interpolation method used in RegionFunction.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Michael E2
                        5 hours ago















                      $begingroup$
                      I should point out that when the boundary can be specified in this way, a crisp, clean boundary can be computed with much less computational effort than the sampling/interpolation method used in RegionFunction.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Michael E2
                      5 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      I should point out that when the boundary can be specified in this way, a crisp, clean boundary can be computed with much less computational effort than the sampling/interpolation method used in RegionFunction.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Michael E2
                      5 hours ago











                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      Some of your c are zero and Mathematica complains about testing for 1/c



                      So I assume any result 1<=q<=1/0 is acceptable by checking for c==0 first and only if c !=0 do I also check for 1/c



                      maxn = Flatten[Table[c, q, f, c, 0, 1, .1, q, 1, 2, .1],1];
                      newmaxn=Select[maxn,(1<=#[[2]]&&#[[1]]==0)||1<=#[[2]]<=1/#[[1]]&];
                      ListPlot3D[newmaxn]





                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        Some of your c are zero and Mathematica complains about testing for 1/c



                        So I assume any result 1<=q<=1/0 is acceptable by checking for c==0 first and only if c !=0 do I also check for 1/c



                        maxn = Flatten[Table[c, q, f, c, 0, 1, .1, q, 1, 2, .1],1];
                        newmaxn=Select[maxn,(1<=#[[2]]&&#[[1]]==0)||1<=#[[2]]<=1/#[[1]]&];
                        ListPlot3D[newmaxn]





                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          Some of your c are zero and Mathematica complains about testing for 1/c



                          So I assume any result 1<=q<=1/0 is acceptable by checking for c==0 first and only if c !=0 do I also check for 1/c



                          maxn = Flatten[Table[c, q, f, c, 0, 1, .1, q, 1, 2, .1],1];
                          newmaxn=Select[maxn,(1<=#[[2]]&&#[[1]]==0)||1<=#[[2]]<=1/#[[1]]&];
                          ListPlot3D[newmaxn]





                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Some of your c are zero and Mathematica complains about testing for 1/c



                          So I assume any result 1<=q<=1/0 is acceptable by checking for c==0 first and only if c !=0 do I also check for 1/c



                          maxn = Flatten[Table[c, q, f, c, 0, 1, .1, q, 1, 2, .1],1];
                          newmaxn=Select[maxn,(1<=#[[2]]&&#[[1]]==0)||1<=#[[2]]<=1/#[[1]]&];
                          ListPlot3D[newmaxn]






                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 6 hours ago









                          BillBill

                          6,6756 silver badges9 bronze badges




                          6,6756 silver badges9 bronze badges



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202068%2f3d-plot-with-an-inequality-condition-for-parameter-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                              Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                              François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480