Can a Resident Assistant Be Told to Ignore a Lawful Order?Are there any Utah, USA laws about landlords providing fire extinguishers or other fire suppression?Who is responsible for an intra-hospital ambulance?Can a US President give police a “kill order”?Is it ever legal for a company to instruct employees not to call 911?Can an apartment release my package without approval, warning, or notification?How is a USA marriage dissolved if neither spouse is resident in the USA?Does a citizen have to open the door to UK police if they do not give a reason?Can apartment management terminate leases over a rule tenants never signed?Possible legal steps for psychological damage caused by a companyIs a police car parked perpendicular to the road (with flashing lights) sufficient by itself to legally establish road closure to all traffic?
Connect neutrals together in 3-gang box (load side) with 3x 3-way switches?
Filtering fine silt/mud from water (not necessarily bacteria etc.)
Is it rude to tell recruiters I would only change jobs for a better salary?
How would you write do the dialogues of two characters talking in a chat room?
Why is the collector feedback bias popular in electret-mic preamp circuits?
Is this more than a packing puzzle?
Teferi's Time Twist on creature with +1/+1 counter
How to make "plastic" sounding distored guitar
Do native speakers use ZVE or CPU?
Will it hurt my career to work as a graphic designer in a startup for beauty and skin care?
Why hasn't the U.S. government paid war reparations to any country it attacked?
Nested-Loop-Join: How many comparisons and how many pages-accesses?
Is this a plot hole in the Lost Mine of Phandelver adventure?
I do not have power to all my breakers
why run a service as a system user?
What is the German equivalent of 干物女 (dried fish woman)?
Absconding a company after 1st day of joining
How long do Apple retain notifications to be pushed to iOS devices until they expire?
Why does ffmpeg choose 10+20+20ms instead of an even 16ms for 60fps gifs?
Hot object in a vacuum
Won 50K! Now what should I do with it
What impact would a dragon the size of Asia have on the environment?
What is this old "lemon-squeezer" shaped pan
Can a Resident Assistant Be Told to Ignore a Lawful Order?
Can a Resident Assistant Be Told to Ignore a Lawful Order?
Are there any Utah, USA laws about landlords providing fire extinguishers or other fire suppression?Who is responsible for an intra-hospital ambulance?Can a US President give police a “kill order”?Is it ever legal for a company to instruct employees not to call 911?Can an apartment release my package without approval, warning, or notification?How is a USA marriage dissolved if neither spouse is resident in the USA?Does a citizen have to open the door to UK police if they do not give a reason?Can apartment management terminate leases over a rule tenants never signed?Possible legal steps for psychological damage caused by a companyIs a police car parked perpendicular to the road (with flashing lights) sufficient by itself to legally establish road closure to all traffic?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Today I have an interesting question involving Police, Fire, and university administration.
A little bit of background: for the past few years, my University has been involved in a small, awkward cold war with local emergency responders over expectations on live-in Residential Assistants during emergency situations. Specifically, the biggest flashpoints are fire alarms and wellness checks on residents.
Within the dorms, we have been told that both Campus Police and Local Fire Departments have been provided keys to all rooms in case an emergency (fire or safety) is reported. We have also been told that we are, under no circumstances, to assist Police or Fire with entering a room (to which we have keys as Resident Assistants, for lockouts and the like).
The heads of the Residential Services Office insist that this is to protect the department in the case of a privacy complaint on behalf of a resident who we let police into the room of, and to avoid ordering (by policy) RAs back into a potentially dangerous building under alarm.
Police and fire, meanwhile, never seem to have the keys. Thus, for the safety of the building or the ill resident, they will order us to open up the door for them.
Which brings us to the issue: Police/fire wants us to open a door, and gives us what I believe is a lawful order do so. Meanwhile, Residence Life wants us to call up to our supervisor and follow a whole procedure, directly countermanding the orders of the officer or firefighter on scene.
Must I open the door, legally speaking? And is my department's policy of refusal illegal/unenforceable?
united-states police ohio emergencies
New contributor
add a comment |
Today I have an interesting question involving Police, Fire, and university administration.
A little bit of background: for the past few years, my University has been involved in a small, awkward cold war with local emergency responders over expectations on live-in Residential Assistants during emergency situations. Specifically, the biggest flashpoints are fire alarms and wellness checks on residents.
Within the dorms, we have been told that both Campus Police and Local Fire Departments have been provided keys to all rooms in case an emergency (fire or safety) is reported. We have also been told that we are, under no circumstances, to assist Police or Fire with entering a room (to which we have keys as Resident Assistants, for lockouts and the like).
The heads of the Residential Services Office insist that this is to protect the department in the case of a privacy complaint on behalf of a resident who we let police into the room of, and to avoid ordering (by policy) RAs back into a potentially dangerous building under alarm.
Police and fire, meanwhile, never seem to have the keys. Thus, for the safety of the building or the ill resident, they will order us to open up the door for them.
Which brings us to the issue: Police/fire wants us to open a door, and gives us what I believe is a lawful order do so. Meanwhile, Residence Life wants us to call up to our supervisor and follow a whole procedure, directly countermanding the orders of the officer or firefighter on scene.
Must I open the door, legally speaking? And is my department's policy of refusal illegal/unenforceable?
united-states police ohio emergencies
New contributor
2
Public university? It's obviously something that needs to be clarified by your university's legal counsel (with them talking to the city police/fire) and stipulated in writing and in your RA work contract. Talk to the legal counsel; they will be part of the overall U administration, at the same admin level as the president, provost, etc.
– BlueDogRanch
9 hours ago
1
Police and fire fighters have boots - that’s a universal key.
– Dale M
8 hours ago
It's a private university, but I agree, I think the department heads need to talk to legal. And @DaleM, we've actually had them use that key a few times on a few doors, hence the more recent urgency of these discussions.
– Chris Brace
11 mins ago
add a comment |
Today I have an interesting question involving Police, Fire, and university administration.
A little bit of background: for the past few years, my University has been involved in a small, awkward cold war with local emergency responders over expectations on live-in Residential Assistants during emergency situations. Specifically, the biggest flashpoints are fire alarms and wellness checks on residents.
Within the dorms, we have been told that both Campus Police and Local Fire Departments have been provided keys to all rooms in case an emergency (fire or safety) is reported. We have also been told that we are, under no circumstances, to assist Police or Fire with entering a room (to which we have keys as Resident Assistants, for lockouts and the like).
The heads of the Residential Services Office insist that this is to protect the department in the case of a privacy complaint on behalf of a resident who we let police into the room of, and to avoid ordering (by policy) RAs back into a potentially dangerous building under alarm.
Police and fire, meanwhile, never seem to have the keys. Thus, for the safety of the building or the ill resident, they will order us to open up the door for them.
Which brings us to the issue: Police/fire wants us to open a door, and gives us what I believe is a lawful order do so. Meanwhile, Residence Life wants us to call up to our supervisor and follow a whole procedure, directly countermanding the orders of the officer or firefighter on scene.
Must I open the door, legally speaking? And is my department's policy of refusal illegal/unenforceable?
united-states police ohio emergencies
New contributor
Today I have an interesting question involving Police, Fire, and university administration.
A little bit of background: for the past few years, my University has been involved in a small, awkward cold war with local emergency responders over expectations on live-in Residential Assistants during emergency situations. Specifically, the biggest flashpoints are fire alarms and wellness checks on residents.
Within the dorms, we have been told that both Campus Police and Local Fire Departments have been provided keys to all rooms in case an emergency (fire or safety) is reported. We have also been told that we are, under no circumstances, to assist Police or Fire with entering a room (to which we have keys as Resident Assistants, for lockouts and the like).
The heads of the Residential Services Office insist that this is to protect the department in the case of a privacy complaint on behalf of a resident who we let police into the room of, and to avoid ordering (by policy) RAs back into a potentially dangerous building under alarm.
Police and fire, meanwhile, never seem to have the keys. Thus, for the safety of the building or the ill resident, they will order us to open up the door for them.
Which brings us to the issue: Police/fire wants us to open a door, and gives us what I believe is a lawful order do so. Meanwhile, Residence Life wants us to call up to our supervisor and follow a whole procedure, directly countermanding the orders of the officer or firefighter on scene.
Must I open the door, legally speaking? And is my department's policy of refusal illegal/unenforceable?
united-states police ohio emergencies
united-states police ohio emergencies
New contributor
New contributor
edited 55 secs ago
Chris Brace
New contributor
asked 9 hours ago
Chris BraceChris Brace
232 bronze badges
232 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
2
Public university? It's obviously something that needs to be clarified by your university's legal counsel (with them talking to the city police/fire) and stipulated in writing and in your RA work contract. Talk to the legal counsel; they will be part of the overall U administration, at the same admin level as the president, provost, etc.
– BlueDogRanch
9 hours ago
1
Police and fire fighters have boots - that’s a universal key.
– Dale M
8 hours ago
It's a private university, but I agree, I think the department heads need to talk to legal. And @DaleM, we've actually had them use that key a few times on a few doors, hence the more recent urgency of these discussions.
– Chris Brace
11 mins ago
add a comment |
2
Public university? It's obviously something that needs to be clarified by your university's legal counsel (with them talking to the city police/fire) and stipulated in writing and in your RA work contract. Talk to the legal counsel; they will be part of the overall U administration, at the same admin level as the president, provost, etc.
– BlueDogRanch
9 hours ago
1
Police and fire fighters have boots - that’s a universal key.
– Dale M
8 hours ago
It's a private university, but I agree, I think the department heads need to talk to legal. And @DaleM, we've actually had them use that key a few times on a few doors, hence the more recent urgency of these discussions.
– Chris Brace
11 mins ago
2
2
Public university? It's obviously something that needs to be clarified by your university's legal counsel (with them talking to the city police/fire) and stipulated in writing and in your RA work contract. Talk to the legal counsel; they will be part of the overall U administration, at the same admin level as the president, provost, etc.
– BlueDogRanch
9 hours ago
Public university? It's obviously something that needs to be clarified by your university's legal counsel (with them talking to the city police/fire) and stipulated in writing and in your RA work contract. Talk to the legal counsel; they will be part of the overall U administration, at the same admin level as the president, provost, etc.
– BlueDogRanch
9 hours ago
1
1
Police and fire fighters have boots - that’s a universal key.
– Dale M
8 hours ago
Police and fire fighters have boots - that’s a universal key.
– Dale M
8 hours ago
It's a private university, but I agree, I think the department heads need to talk to legal. And @DaleM, we've actually had them use that key a few times on a few doors, hence the more recent urgency of these discussions.
– Chris Brace
11 mins ago
It's a private university, but I agree, I think the department heads need to talk to legal. And @DaleM, we've actually had them use that key a few times on a few doors, hence the more recent urgency of these discussions.
– Chris Brace
11 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There is a state law that requires you to obey the police: ORC 2917.13, which says you may not
Fail to obey the lawful order of any law enforcement officer engaged
in the law enforcement officer's duties at the scene of or in
connection with a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind.
If you do,
misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If a
violation of this section creates a risk of physical harm to persons
or property, misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the first
degree.
You also cannot
Hamper the lawful operations of any law enforcement officer,
firefighter, rescuer, medical person, emergency medical services
person, or other authorized person, engaged in the person's duties at
the scene of a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind
"Hamper" is not defined statutorily, but the plain meaning of "hamper" is not the same as "fail to assist". We have not established that the order is lawful, however, which is crucial. The police cannot just freely search a residence without permission. If they have permission from the occupant, they can search and seize. If they have probable cause to believe that a crime exists and the circumstances make a warrant impractical, they can search and seize. I don't know what you mean by "wellness check", but that seems plainly to be unlawful entry. However, if the resident calls 911 and reports that he is having an issue, that is sufficient consent for entry.
In the case of a fire alarm, the fire code authorizes a fire department official in charge of an actual emergency response incident to order the evacuation of a building, and occupants are required to comply. If we suppose that the smoke detector in a room has gone off, the fire department is authorized to inspect for fire, and there is a provision under the law about failure to obey a lawful command (to open the door so that they can look for fire). Problem: you cannot know whether the order is lawful. The officer doesn't decide what is lawful, the courts do (after the fact), and typically a command is found to be lawful unless it is clearly unlawful.
The order from your supervisor is not "enforceable" in the sense that you can be arrested and imprisoned or fined for disobeying the boss. However, there is a potential club they can use against you, namely firing you for disobeying the order. Normally, you can be fired for wearing the wrong shirt. But there are laws about employers doing illegal things, such as ORC 4113.52, which provides recourse when
the employee reasonably believes that the violation is a criminal
offense that is likely to cause an imminent risk of physical harm to
persons or a hazard to public health or safety
etc. In which case you report this to the supervisor, they have 24 hours after getting the report to correct the situation, and after that you would report the situation to the county prosecutor. (Read all of the details in the linked law, don't just skip steps: this is an executive summary). Having done this, you are protected from being fired, demoted. reassigned etc. The employer will be strongly motivated to not incur the penalties for violating the whistle blower statute. Additionally, you can sue the employer if they fire you for refusing to violate the law (termination in violation of public policy).
This is an excellent summary of the relevant law, and confirms several of my (admittedly non-legal) suspicions. To clarify, a wellness check is where another resident has called the police, and indicated they believe the resident is an imminent harm to themselves. A rare, but dangerous situation. And just knowing that the order is legally suspect should hopefully encourage some change - this policy regarding fire alarms has been on the ropes for awhile, and I think with the proper legal challenge, it will quickly fall away.
– Chris Brace
2 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Chris Brace is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42930%2fcan-a-resident-assistant-be-told-to-ignore-a-lawful-order%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is a state law that requires you to obey the police: ORC 2917.13, which says you may not
Fail to obey the lawful order of any law enforcement officer engaged
in the law enforcement officer's duties at the scene of or in
connection with a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind.
If you do,
misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If a
violation of this section creates a risk of physical harm to persons
or property, misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the first
degree.
You also cannot
Hamper the lawful operations of any law enforcement officer,
firefighter, rescuer, medical person, emergency medical services
person, or other authorized person, engaged in the person's duties at
the scene of a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind
"Hamper" is not defined statutorily, but the plain meaning of "hamper" is not the same as "fail to assist". We have not established that the order is lawful, however, which is crucial. The police cannot just freely search a residence without permission. If they have permission from the occupant, they can search and seize. If they have probable cause to believe that a crime exists and the circumstances make a warrant impractical, they can search and seize. I don't know what you mean by "wellness check", but that seems plainly to be unlawful entry. However, if the resident calls 911 and reports that he is having an issue, that is sufficient consent for entry.
In the case of a fire alarm, the fire code authorizes a fire department official in charge of an actual emergency response incident to order the evacuation of a building, and occupants are required to comply. If we suppose that the smoke detector in a room has gone off, the fire department is authorized to inspect for fire, and there is a provision under the law about failure to obey a lawful command (to open the door so that they can look for fire). Problem: you cannot know whether the order is lawful. The officer doesn't decide what is lawful, the courts do (after the fact), and typically a command is found to be lawful unless it is clearly unlawful.
The order from your supervisor is not "enforceable" in the sense that you can be arrested and imprisoned or fined for disobeying the boss. However, there is a potential club they can use against you, namely firing you for disobeying the order. Normally, you can be fired for wearing the wrong shirt. But there are laws about employers doing illegal things, such as ORC 4113.52, which provides recourse when
the employee reasonably believes that the violation is a criminal
offense that is likely to cause an imminent risk of physical harm to
persons or a hazard to public health or safety
etc. In which case you report this to the supervisor, they have 24 hours after getting the report to correct the situation, and after that you would report the situation to the county prosecutor. (Read all of the details in the linked law, don't just skip steps: this is an executive summary). Having done this, you are protected from being fired, demoted. reassigned etc. The employer will be strongly motivated to not incur the penalties for violating the whistle blower statute. Additionally, you can sue the employer if they fire you for refusing to violate the law (termination in violation of public policy).
This is an excellent summary of the relevant law, and confirms several of my (admittedly non-legal) suspicions. To clarify, a wellness check is where another resident has called the police, and indicated they believe the resident is an imminent harm to themselves. A rare, but dangerous situation. And just knowing that the order is legally suspect should hopefully encourage some change - this policy regarding fire alarms has been on the ropes for awhile, and I think with the proper legal challenge, it will quickly fall away.
– Chris Brace
2 mins ago
add a comment |
There is a state law that requires you to obey the police: ORC 2917.13, which says you may not
Fail to obey the lawful order of any law enforcement officer engaged
in the law enforcement officer's duties at the scene of or in
connection with a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind.
If you do,
misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If a
violation of this section creates a risk of physical harm to persons
or property, misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the first
degree.
You also cannot
Hamper the lawful operations of any law enforcement officer,
firefighter, rescuer, medical person, emergency medical services
person, or other authorized person, engaged in the person's duties at
the scene of a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind
"Hamper" is not defined statutorily, but the plain meaning of "hamper" is not the same as "fail to assist". We have not established that the order is lawful, however, which is crucial. The police cannot just freely search a residence without permission. If they have permission from the occupant, they can search and seize. If they have probable cause to believe that a crime exists and the circumstances make a warrant impractical, they can search and seize. I don't know what you mean by "wellness check", but that seems plainly to be unlawful entry. However, if the resident calls 911 and reports that he is having an issue, that is sufficient consent for entry.
In the case of a fire alarm, the fire code authorizes a fire department official in charge of an actual emergency response incident to order the evacuation of a building, and occupants are required to comply. If we suppose that the smoke detector in a room has gone off, the fire department is authorized to inspect for fire, and there is a provision under the law about failure to obey a lawful command (to open the door so that they can look for fire). Problem: you cannot know whether the order is lawful. The officer doesn't decide what is lawful, the courts do (after the fact), and typically a command is found to be lawful unless it is clearly unlawful.
The order from your supervisor is not "enforceable" in the sense that you can be arrested and imprisoned or fined for disobeying the boss. However, there is a potential club they can use against you, namely firing you for disobeying the order. Normally, you can be fired for wearing the wrong shirt. But there are laws about employers doing illegal things, such as ORC 4113.52, which provides recourse when
the employee reasonably believes that the violation is a criminal
offense that is likely to cause an imminent risk of physical harm to
persons or a hazard to public health or safety
etc. In which case you report this to the supervisor, they have 24 hours after getting the report to correct the situation, and after that you would report the situation to the county prosecutor. (Read all of the details in the linked law, don't just skip steps: this is an executive summary). Having done this, you are protected from being fired, demoted. reassigned etc. The employer will be strongly motivated to not incur the penalties for violating the whistle blower statute. Additionally, you can sue the employer if they fire you for refusing to violate the law (termination in violation of public policy).
This is an excellent summary of the relevant law, and confirms several of my (admittedly non-legal) suspicions. To clarify, a wellness check is where another resident has called the police, and indicated they believe the resident is an imminent harm to themselves. A rare, but dangerous situation. And just knowing that the order is legally suspect should hopefully encourage some change - this policy regarding fire alarms has been on the ropes for awhile, and I think with the proper legal challenge, it will quickly fall away.
– Chris Brace
2 mins ago
add a comment |
There is a state law that requires you to obey the police: ORC 2917.13, which says you may not
Fail to obey the lawful order of any law enforcement officer engaged
in the law enforcement officer's duties at the scene of or in
connection with a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind.
If you do,
misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If a
violation of this section creates a risk of physical harm to persons
or property, misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the first
degree.
You also cannot
Hamper the lawful operations of any law enforcement officer,
firefighter, rescuer, medical person, emergency medical services
person, or other authorized person, engaged in the person's duties at
the scene of a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind
"Hamper" is not defined statutorily, but the plain meaning of "hamper" is not the same as "fail to assist". We have not established that the order is lawful, however, which is crucial. The police cannot just freely search a residence without permission. If they have permission from the occupant, they can search and seize. If they have probable cause to believe that a crime exists and the circumstances make a warrant impractical, they can search and seize. I don't know what you mean by "wellness check", but that seems plainly to be unlawful entry. However, if the resident calls 911 and reports that he is having an issue, that is sufficient consent for entry.
In the case of a fire alarm, the fire code authorizes a fire department official in charge of an actual emergency response incident to order the evacuation of a building, and occupants are required to comply. If we suppose that the smoke detector in a room has gone off, the fire department is authorized to inspect for fire, and there is a provision under the law about failure to obey a lawful command (to open the door so that they can look for fire). Problem: you cannot know whether the order is lawful. The officer doesn't decide what is lawful, the courts do (after the fact), and typically a command is found to be lawful unless it is clearly unlawful.
The order from your supervisor is not "enforceable" in the sense that you can be arrested and imprisoned or fined for disobeying the boss. However, there is a potential club they can use against you, namely firing you for disobeying the order. Normally, you can be fired for wearing the wrong shirt. But there are laws about employers doing illegal things, such as ORC 4113.52, which provides recourse when
the employee reasonably believes that the violation is a criminal
offense that is likely to cause an imminent risk of physical harm to
persons or a hazard to public health or safety
etc. In which case you report this to the supervisor, they have 24 hours after getting the report to correct the situation, and after that you would report the situation to the county prosecutor. (Read all of the details in the linked law, don't just skip steps: this is an executive summary). Having done this, you are protected from being fired, demoted. reassigned etc. The employer will be strongly motivated to not incur the penalties for violating the whistle blower statute. Additionally, you can sue the employer if they fire you for refusing to violate the law (termination in violation of public policy).
There is a state law that requires you to obey the police: ORC 2917.13, which says you may not
Fail to obey the lawful order of any law enforcement officer engaged
in the law enforcement officer's duties at the scene of or in
connection with a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind.
If you do,
misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If a
violation of this section creates a risk of physical harm to persons
or property, misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the first
degree.
You also cannot
Hamper the lawful operations of any law enforcement officer,
firefighter, rescuer, medical person, emergency medical services
person, or other authorized person, engaged in the person's duties at
the scene of a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind
"Hamper" is not defined statutorily, but the plain meaning of "hamper" is not the same as "fail to assist". We have not established that the order is lawful, however, which is crucial. The police cannot just freely search a residence without permission. If they have permission from the occupant, they can search and seize. If they have probable cause to believe that a crime exists and the circumstances make a warrant impractical, they can search and seize. I don't know what you mean by "wellness check", but that seems plainly to be unlawful entry. However, if the resident calls 911 and reports that he is having an issue, that is sufficient consent for entry.
In the case of a fire alarm, the fire code authorizes a fire department official in charge of an actual emergency response incident to order the evacuation of a building, and occupants are required to comply. If we suppose that the smoke detector in a room has gone off, the fire department is authorized to inspect for fire, and there is a provision under the law about failure to obey a lawful command (to open the door so that they can look for fire). Problem: you cannot know whether the order is lawful. The officer doesn't decide what is lawful, the courts do (after the fact), and typically a command is found to be lawful unless it is clearly unlawful.
The order from your supervisor is not "enforceable" in the sense that you can be arrested and imprisoned or fined for disobeying the boss. However, there is a potential club they can use against you, namely firing you for disobeying the order. Normally, you can be fired for wearing the wrong shirt. But there are laws about employers doing illegal things, such as ORC 4113.52, which provides recourse when
the employee reasonably believes that the violation is a criminal
offense that is likely to cause an imminent risk of physical harm to
persons or a hazard to public health or safety
etc. In which case you report this to the supervisor, they have 24 hours after getting the report to correct the situation, and after that you would report the situation to the county prosecutor. (Read all of the details in the linked law, don't just skip steps: this is an executive summary). Having done this, you are protected from being fired, demoted. reassigned etc. The employer will be strongly motivated to not incur the penalties for violating the whistle blower statute. Additionally, you can sue the employer if they fire you for refusing to violate the law (termination in violation of public policy).
answered 8 hours ago
user6726user6726
65.9k4 gold badges67 silver badges122 bronze badges
65.9k4 gold badges67 silver badges122 bronze badges
This is an excellent summary of the relevant law, and confirms several of my (admittedly non-legal) suspicions. To clarify, a wellness check is where another resident has called the police, and indicated they believe the resident is an imminent harm to themselves. A rare, but dangerous situation. And just knowing that the order is legally suspect should hopefully encourage some change - this policy regarding fire alarms has been on the ropes for awhile, and I think with the proper legal challenge, it will quickly fall away.
– Chris Brace
2 mins ago
add a comment |
This is an excellent summary of the relevant law, and confirms several of my (admittedly non-legal) suspicions. To clarify, a wellness check is where another resident has called the police, and indicated they believe the resident is an imminent harm to themselves. A rare, but dangerous situation. And just knowing that the order is legally suspect should hopefully encourage some change - this policy regarding fire alarms has been on the ropes for awhile, and I think with the proper legal challenge, it will quickly fall away.
– Chris Brace
2 mins ago
This is an excellent summary of the relevant law, and confirms several of my (admittedly non-legal) suspicions. To clarify, a wellness check is where another resident has called the police, and indicated they believe the resident is an imminent harm to themselves. A rare, but dangerous situation. And just knowing that the order is legally suspect should hopefully encourage some change - this policy regarding fire alarms has been on the ropes for awhile, and I think with the proper legal challenge, it will quickly fall away.
– Chris Brace
2 mins ago
This is an excellent summary of the relevant law, and confirms several of my (admittedly non-legal) suspicions. To clarify, a wellness check is where another resident has called the police, and indicated they believe the resident is an imminent harm to themselves. A rare, but dangerous situation. And just knowing that the order is legally suspect should hopefully encourage some change - this policy regarding fire alarms has been on the ropes for awhile, and I think with the proper legal challenge, it will quickly fall away.
– Chris Brace
2 mins ago
add a comment |
Chris Brace is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Chris Brace is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Chris Brace is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Chris Brace is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42930%2fcan-a-resident-assistant-be-told-to-ignore-a-lawful-order%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Public university? It's obviously something that needs to be clarified by your university's legal counsel (with them talking to the city police/fire) and stipulated in writing and in your RA work contract. Talk to the legal counsel; they will be part of the overall U administration, at the same admin level as the president, provost, etc.
– BlueDogRanch
9 hours ago
1
Police and fire fighters have boots - that’s a universal key.
– Dale M
8 hours ago
It's a private university, but I agree, I think the department heads need to talk to legal. And @DaleM, we've actually had them use that key a few times on a few doors, hence the more recent urgency of these discussions.
– Chris Brace
11 mins ago