Variation in the spelling of word-final MThe Latin word “Have” rather than “Ave” as a translation of the Greek word Χαῖρε?Were there informal spelling variants in classical Latin?How can I ask the spelling of a word in Latin?What would be the etymologically Greek spelling of 'misogynoir'?Emeo – possibly misspelled wordChurch Latin: when did the orthography change occur?Lex Valeria Horatia de senatus consulta - spelling?Spelling aquaeductus togetherWhich Latin word has the most spelling variants?The spelling of τηλικοῦτος
Is this a Lost Mine of Phandelver Plot Hole?
Should you avoid redundant information after dialogue?
Redox reactions redefined
Why is dry soil hydrophobic? Bad gardener paradox
What are the arguments for California’s nonpartisan blanket primaries other than giving Democrats more power?
GPIO and Python - GPIO.output() not working
Why do they not say "The Baby"
Why do legislative committees exist?
Meaning of slash chord without anything left of the slash
Absconding a company after 1st day of joining
What's the phrasal verb for carbonated drinks exploding out of the can after being shaken?
Ezek. 24:1-2, "Again in the ninth year, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the month, ...." Which month was the tenth month?
Why linear regression uses "vertical" distance to the best-fit-line, instead of actual distance?
HackerRank: Electronics Shop
Are villager price increases due to killing them temporary?
Do native speakers use ZVE or CPU?
Hot object in a vacuum
Nested-Loop-Join: How many comparisons and how many pages-accesses?
Replacing URI when using dynamic hosts in Nginx reverse proxy
Does optical correction give a more aesthetic look to the SBI logo?
How would someone destroy a black hole that’s at the centre of a planet?
Possible isometry groups of open manifolds
What are some symbols representing peasants/oppressed persons fighting back?
Cubic programming and beyond?
Variation in the spelling of word-final M
The Latin word “Have” rather than “Ave” as a translation of the Greek word Χαῖρε?Were there informal spelling variants in classical Latin?How can I ask the spelling of a word in Latin?What would be the etymologically Greek spelling of 'misogynoir'?Emeo – possibly misspelled wordChurch Latin: when did the orthography change occur?Lex Valeria Horatia de senatus consulta - spelling?Spelling aquaeductus togetherWhich Latin word has the most spelling variants?The spelling of τηλικοῦτος
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I recently visited the museum of the main monastery of the Carthusian order near Grenoble.
I saw this in an open book on display in a former chamber of a monk:
What took me by surprise is the variation in word-final m.
Sometimes it is spelled as a tilde on top of the last vowel, sometimes as a proper m.
For example, the third line has both saltem and vitã.
The tilde only appears in the first stanza in this sample.
This leads me to a more general question:
When both variants of word-final m are available, when are the two options used?
Is one preferred over the other in some cases?
Or is it completely free variation depending on chance and availability of space?
Is there any division of roles between the two when they appear in the same text?
medieval-latin new-latin orthography spelling
add a comment |
I recently visited the museum of the main monastery of the Carthusian order near Grenoble.
I saw this in an open book on display in a former chamber of a monk:
What took me by surprise is the variation in word-final m.
Sometimes it is spelled as a tilde on top of the last vowel, sometimes as a proper m.
For example, the third line has both saltem and vitã.
The tilde only appears in the first stanza in this sample.
This leads me to a more general question:
When both variants of word-final m are available, when are the two options used?
Is one preferred over the other in some cases?
Or is it completely free variation depending on chance and availability of space?
Is there any division of roles between the two when they appear in the same text?
medieval-latin new-latin orthography spelling
add a comment |
I recently visited the museum of the main monastery of the Carthusian order near Grenoble.
I saw this in an open book on display in a former chamber of a monk:
What took me by surprise is the variation in word-final m.
Sometimes it is spelled as a tilde on top of the last vowel, sometimes as a proper m.
For example, the third line has both saltem and vitã.
The tilde only appears in the first stanza in this sample.
This leads me to a more general question:
When both variants of word-final m are available, when are the two options used?
Is one preferred over the other in some cases?
Or is it completely free variation depending on chance and availability of space?
Is there any division of roles between the two when they appear in the same text?
medieval-latin new-latin orthography spelling
I recently visited the museum of the main monastery of the Carthusian order near Grenoble.
I saw this in an open book on display in a former chamber of a monk:
What took me by surprise is the variation in word-final m.
Sometimes it is spelled as a tilde on top of the last vowel, sometimes as a proper m.
For example, the third line has both saltem and vitã.
The tilde only appears in the first stanza in this sample.
This leads me to a more general question:
When both variants of word-final m are available, when are the two options used?
Is one preferred over the other in some cases?
Or is it completely free variation depending on chance and availability of space?
Is there any division of roles between the two when they appear in the same text?
medieval-latin new-latin orthography spelling
medieval-latin new-latin orthography spelling
edited 5 hours ago
Joonas Ilmavirta
asked 8 hours ago
Joonas Ilmavirta♦Joonas Ilmavirta
50.9k12 gold badges73 silver badges305 bronze badges
50.9k12 gold badges73 silver badges305 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I'm afraid my answer is the boring one: free variation, based on the amount of space available.
The tilde originally arose purely as an abbreviation: instead of writing an n or m in line with the text, it could be written above the vowel instead, saving a bit of space. Eventually its form got simplified into the tiny squiggle we use nowadays.
But the meaning was always simply an orthographic one: "there should be an n or m after this letter". It didn't necessarily indicate anything about the pronunciation, or about the grammar: it could be used in prefixes or roots just as well as suffixes. For example, the following shows ĩperpetuũ (i.e. imperpetuum), with two nasals removed in different places:
So in instances like this, the choice of whether to use a letter or a tilde comes down purely to how much space is available. On the second line, writing civium would have compressed the other words in an unpleasant way; on the third line, using both saltem and vitam would have led to too much compression, while both saltẽ and vitã would have left too much empty space. So saltem was written out in full, and vitã abbreviated.
If possible, such as when there's all the space in the world available, final letters are generally included: you can see that there are no abbreviations in the other verses, where there was more freedom to adjust the kerning and spacing (since it didn't have to line up with the notes). But in manuscript documents, where scribal effort and space are at a premium, abbreviations will often be used wherever the scribe can get away with them.
(P.S. The tilde's use eventually expanded to cover other removed letters, apart from n and m. But nasals were always one of the more popular uses for the symbol.)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "644"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11136%2fvariation-in-the-spelling-of-word-final-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I'm afraid my answer is the boring one: free variation, based on the amount of space available.
The tilde originally arose purely as an abbreviation: instead of writing an n or m in line with the text, it could be written above the vowel instead, saving a bit of space. Eventually its form got simplified into the tiny squiggle we use nowadays.
But the meaning was always simply an orthographic one: "there should be an n or m after this letter". It didn't necessarily indicate anything about the pronunciation, or about the grammar: it could be used in prefixes or roots just as well as suffixes. For example, the following shows ĩperpetuũ (i.e. imperpetuum), with two nasals removed in different places:
So in instances like this, the choice of whether to use a letter or a tilde comes down purely to how much space is available. On the second line, writing civium would have compressed the other words in an unpleasant way; on the third line, using both saltem and vitam would have led to too much compression, while both saltẽ and vitã would have left too much empty space. So saltem was written out in full, and vitã abbreviated.
If possible, such as when there's all the space in the world available, final letters are generally included: you can see that there are no abbreviations in the other verses, where there was more freedom to adjust the kerning and spacing (since it didn't have to line up with the notes). But in manuscript documents, where scribal effort and space are at a premium, abbreviations will often be used wherever the scribe can get away with them.
(P.S. The tilde's use eventually expanded to cover other removed letters, apart from n and m. But nasals were always one of the more popular uses for the symbol.)
add a comment |
I'm afraid my answer is the boring one: free variation, based on the amount of space available.
The tilde originally arose purely as an abbreviation: instead of writing an n or m in line with the text, it could be written above the vowel instead, saving a bit of space. Eventually its form got simplified into the tiny squiggle we use nowadays.
But the meaning was always simply an orthographic one: "there should be an n or m after this letter". It didn't necessarily indicate anything about the pronunciation, or about the grammar: it could be used in prefixes or roots just as well as suffixes. For example, the following shows ĩperpetuũ (i.e. imperpetuum), with two nasals removed in different places:
So in instances like this, the choice of whether to use a letter or a tilde comes down purely to how much space is available. On the second line, writing civium would have compressed the other words in an unpleasant way; on the third line, using both saltem and vitam would have led to too much compression, while both saltẽ and vitã would have left too much empty space. So saltem was written out in full, and vitã abbreviated.
If possible, such as when there's all the space in the world available, final letters are generally included: you can see that there are no abbreviations in the other verses, where there was more freedom to adjust the kerning and spacing (since it didn't have to line up with the notes). But in manuscript documents, where scribal effort and space are at a premium, abbreviations will often be used wherever the scribe can get away with them.
(P.S. The tilde's use eventually expanded to cover other removed letters, apart from n and m. But nasals were always one of the more popular uses for the symbol.)
add a comment |
I'm afraid my answer is the boring one: free variation, based on the amount of space available.
The tilde originally arose purely as an abbreviation: instead of writing an n or m in line with the text, it could be written above the vowel instead, saving a bit of space. Eventually its form got simplified into the tiny squiggle we use nowadays.
But the meaning was always simply an orthographic one: "there should be an n or m after this letter". It didn't necessarily indicate anything about the pronunciation, or about the grammar: it could be used in prefixes or roots just as well as suffixes. For example, the following shows ĩperpetuũ (i.e. imperpetuum), with two nasals removed in different places:
So in instances like this, the choice of whether to use a letter or a tilde comes down purely to how much space is available. On the second line, writing civium would have compressed the other words in an unpleasant way; on the third line, using both saltem and vitam would have led to too much compression, while both saltẽ and vitã would have left too much empty space. So saltem was written out in full, and vitã abbreviated.
If possible, such as when there's all the space in the world available, final letters are generally included: you can see that there are no abbreviations in the other verses, where there was more freedom to adjust the kerning and spacing (since it didn't have to line up with the notes). But in manuscript documents, where scribal effort and space are at a premium, abbreviations will often be used wherever the scribe can get away with them.
(P.S. The tilde's use eventually expanded to cover other removed letters, apart from n and m. But nasals were always one of the more popular uses for the symbol.)
I'm afraid my answer is the boring one: free variation, based on the amount of space available.
The tilde originally arose purely as an abbreviation: instead of writing an n or m in line with the text, it could be written above the vowel instead, saving a bit of space. Eventually its form got simplified into the tiny squiggle we use nowadays.
But the meaning was always simply an orthographic one: "there should be an n or m after this letter". It didn't necessarily indicate anything about the pronunciation, or about the grammar: it could be used in prefixes or roots just as well as suffixes. For example, the following shows ĩperpetuũ (i.e. imperpetuum), with two nasals removed in different places:
So in instances like this, the choice of whether to use a letter or a tilde comes down purely to how much space is available. On the second line, writing civium would have compressed the other words in an unpleasant way; on the third line, using both saltem and vitam would have led to too much compression, while both saltẽ and vitã would have left too much empty space. So saltem was written out in full, and vitã abbreviated.
If possible, such as when there's all the space in the world available, final letters are generally included: you can see that there are no abbreviations in the other verses, where there was more freedom to adjust the kerning and spacing (since it didn't have to line up with the notes). But in manuscript documents, where scribal effort and space are at a premium, abbreviations will often be used wherever the scribe can get away with them.
(P.S. The tilde's use eventually expanded to cover other removed letters, apart from n and m. But nasals were always one of the more popular uses for the symbol.)
answered 7 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
23.4k2 gold badges32 silver badges98 bronze badges
23.4k2 gold badges32 silver badges98 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Latin Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11136%2fvariation-in-the-spelling-of-word-final-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown