When did Nuremberg adopt the Gregorian Calendar?When did Frankfurt am Main adopt the Gregorian Calendar?What was the motivation for the Gregorian Calendar?Who uses a pre-“Gregorian” calendar and why?Where and when was the shortest calendar day in history, due to DST and calendar changes, etc?Why does the Gregorian calendar start where it does?Were the dates of saints days moved as part of the Gregorian calendar reforms?When did Frankfurt am Main adopt the Gregorian Calendar?How was debt handled in the change over from the Julian calendar to the Gregorian?Correspondence between the modern and the antique calendarWhy was the date moved by 10 days instead of 9 during Gregorian calendar reform?How old was the Egyptian calendar system?

How to remove this component from PCB

Why does Linux list NVMe drives as /dev/nvme0 instead of /dev/sda?

"Correct me if I'm wrong"

Do I have any obligations to my PhD supervisor's requests after I have graduated?

Heavily limited premature compiler translates text into excecutable python code

Ruining the family name

What happened to Steve's Shield in Iron Man 2?

Is there any difference between Т34ВМ1 and КМ1858ВМ1/3?

Cut the gold chain

How do I farm creepers for XP without them exploding?

Can Ogre clerics use Purify Food and Drink on humanoid characters?

I don't like coffee, neither beer. How to politely work my way around that in a business situation?

Identifying unknown map projection for image

Why is it easier to balance a non-moving bike standing up than sitting down?

Explain why a line can never intersect a plane in exactly two points.

Why tighten down in a criss-cross pattern?

Similarity score: Can Sklearn SVR predict values greater than 1 and less than 0?

career in signal processing

Trainee keeps passing deadlines for independent learning

`-` in tar xzf -

Where's this swanky house and vineyard near a mountain?

How would modern naval warfare have to have developed differently for battleships to still be relevant in the 21st century?

UK - Working without a contract. I resign and guy wants to sue me

Why does using different ArrayList constructors cause a different growth rate of the internal array?



When did Nuremberg adopt the Gregorian Calendar?


When did Frankfurt am Main adopt the Gregorian Calendar?What was the motivation for the Gregorian Calendar?Who uses a pre-“Gregorian” calendar and why?Where and when was the shortest calendar day in history, due to DST and calendar changes, etc?Why does the Gregorian calendar start where it does?Were the dates of saints days moved as part of the Gregorian calendar reforms?When did Frankfurt am Main adopt the Gregorian Calendar?How was debt handled in the change over from the Julian calendar to the Gregorian?Correspondence between the modern and the antique calendarWhy was the date moved by 10 days instead of 9 during Gregorian calendar reform?How old was the Egyptian calendar system?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6















A similar question has been posed on this site in the past, "When did Frankfurt am Main adopt the Gregorian Calendar?. I'm trying to discern exactly when the city of Nuremberg adopted the Gregorian Calendar but haven't found a definitive answer yet.



Bavaria as a whole has a tradition of Catholic faith. Can we assume that Nuremberg adopted the Gregorian Calendar at 1583 along with the other Catholic states of the Holy Roman Empire? I would like to base my answer upon facts and not the assumptions I've made above if possible.










share|improve this question









New contributor



forest_codes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 5





    Nuremburg was a Free Imperial City in 1583 and so there is no guarantee that it would have the same Catholic religion as Bavaria. Don't assume that a German city belonged to a principality - in this case Nuremburg was itself a state of the empire.

    – MAGolding
    8 hours ago







  • 5





    Nuremberg adopted Protestantism in 1525, thanks to Osiander and Lazarus Spengler, and thus was part of the Corpus Evangelicorum in the Regensburg Reichstag. So it's quite likely that Nuremberg followed the 1699 proposal of the Reichstag regarding the calendar reform in 1700 (just as comment since i can't provide any sources yet...)

    – tohuwawohu
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    Additional note: technically, the Nuremberg Council may in fact have adopted the Reichstag's recommendation in 1699. Its implementation may be a different question. Often, the calendar was adapted by leaving out 11 days in february 1700, so that march 1st followed on february 18.

    – tohuwawohu
    7 hours ago


















6















A similar question has been posed on this site in the past, "When did Frankfurt am Main adopt the Gregorian Calendar?. I'm trying to discern exactly when the city of Nuremberg adopted the Gregorian Calendar but haven't found a definitive answer yet.



Bavaria as a whole has a tradition of Catholic faith. Can we assume that Nuremberg adopted the Gregorian Calendar at 1583 along with the other Catholic states of the Holy Roman Empire? I would like to base my answer upon facts and not the assumptions I've made above if possible.










share|improve this question









New contributor



forest_codes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 5





    Nuremburg was a Free Imperial City in 1583 and so there is no guarantee that it would have the same Catholic religion as Bavaria. Don't assume that a German city belonged to a principality - in this case Nuremburg was itself a state of the empire.

    – MAGolding
    8 hours ago







  • 5





    Nuremberg adopted Protestantism in 1525, thanks to Osiander and Lazarus Spengler, and thus was part of the Corpus Evangelicorum in the Regensburg Reichstag. So it's quite likely that Nuremberg followed the 1699 proposal of the Reichstag regarding the calendar reform in 1700 (just as comment since i can't provide any sources yet...)

    – tohuwawohu
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    Additional note: technically, the Nuremberg Council may in fact have adopted the Reichstag's recommendation in 1699. Its implementation may be a different question. Often, the calendar was adapted by leaving out 11 days in february 1700, so that march 1st followed on february 18.

    – tohuwawohu
    7 hours ago














6












6








6








A similar question has been posed on this site in the past, "When did Frankfurt am Main adopt the Gregorian Calendar?. I'm trying to discern exactly when the city of Nuremberg adopted the Gregorian Calendar but haven't found a definitive answer yet.



Bavaria as a whole has a tradition of Catholic faith. Can we assume that Nuremberg adopted the Gregorian Calendar at 1583 along with the other Catholic states of the Holy Roman Empire? I would like to base my answer upon facts and not the assumptions I've made above if possible.










share|improve this question









New contributor



forest_codes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











A similar question has been posed on this site in the past, "When did Frankfurt am Main adopt the Gregorian Calendar?. I'm trying to discern exactly when the city of Nuremberg adopted the Gregorian Calendar but haven't found a definitive answer yet.



Bavaria as a whole has a tradition of Catholic faith. Can we assume that Nuremberg adopted the Gregorian Calendar at 1583 along with the other Catholic states of the Holy Roman Empire? I would like to base my answer upon facts and not the assumptions I've made above if possible.







germany calendar holy-roman-empire






share|improve this question









New contributor



forest_codes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



forest_codes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 9 hours ago









Steve Bird

14.1k36471




14.1k36471






New contributor



forest_codes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 10 hours ago









forest_codesforest_codes

334




334




New contributor



forest_codes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




forest_codes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 5





    Nuremburg was a Free Imperial City in 1583 and so there is no guarantee that it would have the same Catholic religion as Bavaria. Don't assume that a German city belonged to a principality - in this case Nuremburg was itself a state of the empire.

    – MAGolding
    8 hours ago







  • 5





    Nuremberg adopted Protestantism in 1525, thanks to Osiander and Lazarus Spengler, and thus was part of the Corpus Evangelicorum in the Regensburg Reichstag. So it's quite likely that Nuremberg followed the 1699 proposal of the Reichstag regarding the calendar reform in 1700 (just as comment since i can't provide any sources yet...)

    – tohuwawohu
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    Additional note: technically, the Nuremberg Council may in fact have adopted the Reichstag's recommendation in 1699. Its implementation may be a different question. Often, the calendar was adapted by leaving out 11 days in february 1700, so that march 1st followed on february 18.

    – tohuwawohu
    7 hours ago













  • 5





    Nuremburg was a Free Imperial City in 1583 and so there is no guarantee that it would have the same Catholic religion as Bavaria. Don't assume that a German city belonged to a principality - in this case Nuremburg was itself a state of the empire.

    – MAGolding
    8 hours ago







  • 5





    Nuremberg adopted Protestantism in 1525, thanks to Osiander and Lazarus Spengler, and thus was part of the Corpus Evangelicorum in the Regensburg Reichstag. So it's quite likely that Nuremberg followed the 1699 proposal of the Reichstag regarding the calendar reform in 1700 (just as comment since i can't provide any sources yet...)

    – tohuwawohu
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    Additional note: technically, the Nuremberg Council may in fact have adopted the Reichstag's recommendation in 1699. Its implementation may be a different question. Often, the calendar was adapted by leaving out 11 days in february 1700, so that march 1st followed on february 18.

    – tohuwawohu
    7 hours ago








5




5





Nuremburg was a Free Imperial City in 1583 and so there is no guarantee that it would have the same Catholic religion as Bavaria. Don't assume that a German city belonged to a principality - in this case Nuremburg was itself a state of the empire.

– MAGolding
8 hours ago






Nuremburg was a Free Imperial City in 1583 and so there is no guarantee that it would have the same Catholic religion as Bavaria. Don't assume that a German city belonged to a principality - in this case Nuremburg was itself a state of the empire.

– MAGolding
8 hours ago





5




5





Nuremberg adopted Protestantism in 1525, thanks to Osiander and Lazarus Spengler, and thus was part of the Corpus Evangelicorum in the Regensburg Reichstag. So it's quite likely that Nuremberg followed the 1699 proposal of the Reichstag regarding the calendar reform in 1700 (just as comment since i can't provide any sources yet...)

– tohuwawohu
8 hours ago





Nuremberg adopted Protestantism in 1525, thanks to Osiander and Lazarus Spengler, and thus was part of the Corpus Evangelicorum in the Regensburg Reichstag. So it's quite likely that Nuremberg followed the 1699 proposal of the Reichstag regarding the calendar reform in 1700 (just as comment since i can't provide any sources yet...)

– tohuwawohu
8 hours ago




3




3





Additional note: technically, the Nuremberg Council may in fact have adopted the Reichstag's recommendation in 1699. Its implementation may be a different question. Often, the calendar was adapted by leaving out 11 days in february 1700, so that march 1st followed on february 18.

– tohuwawohu
7 hours ago






Additional note: technically, the Nuremberg Council may in fact have adopted the Reichstag's recommendation in 1699. Its implementation may be a different question. Often, the calendar was adapted by leaving out 11 days in february 1700, so that march 1st followed on february 18.

– tohuwawohu
7 hours ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














According to this source, Nürnberg adopted the calendar in 1699:






share|improve this answer























  • I've accepted this answer. The additional information provided in the comments to my question add deeper contextual information and further support the answer provided, thank you.

    – forest_codes
    1 hour ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






forest_codes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f53247%2fwhen-did-nuremberg-adopt-the-gregorian-calendar%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














According to this source, Nürnberg adopted the calendar in 1699:






share|improve this answer























  • I've accepted this answer. The additional information provided in the comments to my question add deeper contextual information and further support the answer provided, thank you.

    – forest_codes
    1 hour ago















4














According to this source, Nürnberg adopted the calendar in 1699:






share|improve this answer























  • I've accepted this answer. The additional information provided in the comments to my question add deeper contextual information and further support the answer provided, thank you.

    – forest_codes
    1 hour ago













4












4








4







According to this source, Nürnberg adopted the calendar in 1699:






share|improve this answer













According to this source, Nürnberg adopted the calendar in 1699:







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 8 hours ago









Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

17.3k25467




17.3k25467












  • I've accepted this answer. The additional information provided in the comments to my question add deeper contextual information and further support the answer provided, thank you.

    – forest_codes
    1 hour ago

















  • I've accepted this answer. The additional information provided in the comments to my question add deeper contextual information and further support the answer provided, thank you.

    – forest_codes
    1 hour ago
















I've accepted this answer. The additional information provided in the comments to my question add deeper contextual information and further support the answer provided, thank you.

– forest_codes
1 hour ago





I've accepted this answer. The additional information provided in the comments to my question add deeper contextual information and further support the answer provided, thank you.

– forest_codes
1 hour ago










forest_codes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















forest_codes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












forest_codes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











forest_codes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f53247%2fwhen-did-nuremberg-adopt-the-gregorian-calendar%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її