Symbolic equivalent of chmod 400problem with chmod commandautomatically set sudo chmod 777Understanding chmod Symbolic Notation and use of OctalWhat is the Ubuntu equivalent of OSX `chmod -h` flag?Incorrectly ran chmod 754Chmod -r issuesAfter doing chmod 400 on /usr the sudo command is not workingConfusion in chmod optionschmod 400 will not change the permissions of a fileCannot change file permission after chmod 400

Swapping rooks in a 4x4 board

Architecture of networked game engine

Generic function to loop over inputs and execute a command in bash?

Are neural networks the wrong tool to solve this 2D platformer/shooter game? Is there a proven way to frame this problem to a neural network?

Short story with brother-sister conjoined twins as protagonists?

Why aren't (poly-)cotton tents more popular?

How can I convince my reader that I will not use a certain trope?

Impossible darts scores

Does the UK have a written constitution?

Is it okay to visually align the elements in a logo?

Why isn’t the tax system continuous rather than bracketed?

Can a US President have someone sent to prison?

First-year PhD giving a talk among well-established researchers in the field

Should I tell my insurance company I'm making payments on my new car?

When is it ok to add filler to a story?

C-152 carb heat on before landing in hot weather?

The impact of an intelligent and (mostly) hostile flying race on weapons and armor

Why do some games show lights shine through walls?

Do French speakers not use the subjunctive informally?

MH370 blackbox - is it still possible to retrieve data from it?

How can I repair scratches on a painted French door?

What is this opening trap called, and how should I play afterwards? How can I refute the gambit, and play if I accept it?

What is this particular type of chord progression, common in classical music, called?

Intuitively, why does putting capacitors in series decrease the equivalent capacitance?



Symbolic equivalent of chmod 400


problem with chmod commandautomatically set sudo chmod 777Understanding chmod Symbolic Notation and use of OctalWhat is the Ubuntu equivalent of OSX `chmod -h` flag?Incorrectly ran chmod 754Chmod -r issuesAfter doing chmod 400 on /usr the sudo command is not workingConfusion in chmod optionschmod 400 will not change the permissions of a fileCannot change file permission after chmod 400






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















The following is often used to set file permissions, a good example being setting a key file to an appropriate permission level to be used by ssh (this being the "octal" form):



chmod 400 filename.xyz


Would it be a correct equivalent and acceptable practice to use the following instead (this is the "symbolic" form)?



chmod a=,u=r filename.xyz


The reason I ask is that it seems a bit clearer for code readability. Still not exactly human readable, but no bit mapping needed.



If maximum readibility (and not terseness) were the primary driver, would there be a better option?










share|improve this question




























    2















    The following is often used to set file permissions, a good example being setting a key file to an appropriate permission level to be used by ssh (this being the "octal" form):



    chmod 400 filename.xyz


    Would it be a correct equivalent and acceptable practice to use the following instead (this is the "symbolic" form)?



    chmod a=,u=r filename.xyz


    The reason I ask is that it seems a bit clearer for code readability. Still not exactly human readable, but no bit mapping needed.



    If maximum readibility (and not terseness) were the primary driver, would there be a better option?










    share|improve this question
























      2












      2








      2








      The following is often used to set file permissions, a good example being setting a key file to an appropriate permission level to be used by ssh (this being the "octal" form):



      chmod 400 filename.xyz


      Would it be a correct equivalent and acceptable practice to use the following instead (this is the "symbolic" form)?



      chmod a=,u=r filename.xyz


      The reason I ask is that it seems a bit clearer for code readability. Still not exactly human readable, but no bit mapping needed.



      If maximum readibility (and not terseness) were the primary driver, would there be a better option?










      share|improve this question














      The following is often used to set file permissions, a good example being setting a key file to an appropriate permission level to be used by ssh (this being the "octal" form):



      chmod 400 filename.xyz


      Would it be a correct equivalent and acceptable practice to use the following instead (this is the "symbolic" form)?



      chmod a=,u=r filename.xyz


      The reason I ask is that it seems a bit clearer for code readability. Still not exactly human readable, but no bit mapping needed.



      If maximum readibility (and not terseness) were the primary driver, would there be a better option?







      permissions chmod






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      GaTechThomasGaTechThomas

      1112 bronze badges




      1112 bronze badges




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          With a=,u=r, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a= and u=r (or the order of a= and u=), the result would be very different. (Yes, a and u are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:



          chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst


          The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx first or u=r first.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor



          chmod a-rwx is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.



















          • That makes a lot of sense.

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • @GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.

            – chmod a-rwx
            8 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "89"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1153204%2fsymbolic-equivalent-of-chmod-400%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          With a=,u=r, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a= and u=r (or the order of a= and u=), the result would be very different. (Yes, a and u are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:



          chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst


          The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx first or u=r first.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor



          chmod a-rwx is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.



















          • That makes a lot of sense.

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • @GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.

            – chmod a-rwx
            8 hours ago















          4














          With a=,u=r, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a= and u=r (or the order of a= and u=), the result would be very different. (Yes, a and u are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:



          chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst


          The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx first or u=r first.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor



          chmod a-rwx is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.



















          • That makes a lot of sense.

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • @GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.

            – chmod a-rwx
            8 hours ago













          4












          4








          4







          With a=,u=r, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a= and u=r (or the order of a= and u=), the result would be very different. (Yes, a and u are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:



          chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst


          The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx first or u=r first.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor



          chmod a-rwx is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          With a=,u=r, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a= and u=r (or the order of a= and u=), the result would be very different. (Yes, a and u are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:



          chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst


          The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx first or u=r first.







          share|improve this answer










          New contributor



          chmod a-rwx is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.








          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 6 hours ago





















          New contributor



          chmod a-rwx is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.








          answered 8 hours ago









          chmod a-rwxchmod a-rwx

          412 bronze badges




          412 bronze badges




          New contributor



          chmod a-rwx is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




          New contributor




          chmod a-rwx is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.














          • That makes a lot of sense.

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • @GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.

            – chmod a-rwx
            8 hours ago

















          • That makes a lot of sense.

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • @GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.

            – chmod a-rwx
            8 hours ago
















          That makes a lot of sense.

          – GaTechThomas
          8 hours ago





          That makes a lot of sense.

          – GaTechThomas
          8 hours ago













          Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?

          – GaTechThomas
          8 hours ago





          Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?

          – GaTechThomas
          8 hours ago













          @GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.

          – chmod a-rwx
          8 hours ago





          @GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.

          – chmod a-rwx
          8 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1153204%2fsymbolic-equivalent-of-chmod-400%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單