Symbolic equivalent of chmod 400problem with chmod commandautomatically set sudo chmod 777Understanding chmod Symbolic Notation and use of OctalWhat is the Ubuntu equivalent of OSX `chmod -h` flag?Incorrectly ran chmod 754Chmod -r issuesAfter doing chmod 400 on /usr the sudo command is not workingConfusion in chmod optionschmod 400 will not change the permissions of a fileCannot change file permission after chmod 400
Swapping rooks in a 4x4 board
Architecture of networked game engine
Generic function to loop over inputs and execute a command in bash?
Are neural networks the wrong tool to solve this 2D platformer/shooter game? Is there a proven way to frame this problem to a neural network?
Short story with brother-sister conjoined twins as protagonists?
Why aren't (poly-)cotton tents more popular?
How can I convince my reader that I will not use a certain trope?
Impossible darts scores
Does the UK have a written constitution?
Is it okay to visually align the elements in a logo?
Why isn’t the tax system continuous rather than bracketed?
Can a US President have someone sent to prison?
First-year PhD giving a talk among well-established researchers in the field
Should I tell my insurance company I'm making payments on my new car?
When is it ok to add filler to a story?
C-152 carb heat on before landing in hot weather?
The impact of an intelligent and (mostly) hostile flying race on weapons and armor
Why do some games show lights shine through walls?
Do French speakers not use the subjunctive informally?
MH370 blackbox - is it still possible to retrieve data from it?
How can I repair scratches on a painted French door?
What is this opening trap called, and how should I play afterwards? How can I refute the gambit, and play if I accept it?
What is this particular type of chord progression, common in classical music, called?
Intuitively, why does putting capacitors in series decrease the equivalent capacitance?
Symbolic equivalent of chmod 400
problem with chmod commandautomatically set sudo chmod 777Understanding chmod Symbolic Notation and use of OctalWhat is the Ubuntu equivalent of OSX `chmod -h` flag?Incorrectly ran chmod 754Chmod -r issuesAfter doing chmod 400 on /usr the sudo command is not workingConfusion in chmod optionschmod 400 will not change the permissions of a fileCannot change file permission after chmod 400
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
The following is often used to set file permissions, a good example being setting a key file to an appropriate permission level to be used by ssh (this being the "octal" form):
chmod 400 filename.xyz
Would it be a correct equivalent and acceptable practice to use the following instead (this is the "symbolic" form)?
chmod a=,u=r filename.xyz
The reason I ask is that it seems a bit clearer for code readability. Still not exactly human readable, but no bit mapping needed.
If maximum readibility (and not terseness) were the primary driver, would there be a better option?
permissions chmod
add a comment |
The following is often used to set file permissions, a good example being setting a key file to an appropriate permission level to be used by ssh (this being the "octal" form):
chmod 400 filename.xyz
Would it be a correct equivalent and acceptable practice to use the following instead (this is the "symbolic" form)?
chmod a=,u=r filename.xyz
The reason I ask is that it seems a bit clearer for code readability. Still not exactly human readable, but no bit mapping needed.
If maximum readibility (and not terseness) were the primary driver, would there be a better option?
permissions chmod
add a comment |
The following is often used to set file permissions, a good example being setting a key file to an appropriate permission level to be used by ssh (this being the "octal" form):
chmod 400 filename.xyz
Would it be a correct equivalent and acceptable practice to use the following instead (this is the "symbolic" form)?
chmod a=,u=r filename.xyz
The reason I ask is that it seems a bit clearer for code readability. Still not exactly human readable, but no bit mapping needed.
If maximum readibility (and not terseness) were the primary driver, would there be a better option?
permissions chmod
The following is often used to set file permissions, a good example being setting a key file to an appropriate permission level to be used by ssh (this being the "octal" form):
chmod 400 filename.xyz
Would it be a correct equivalent and acceptable practice to use the following instead (this is the "symbolic" form)?
chmod a=,u=r filename.xyz
The reason I ask is that it seems a bit clearer for code readability. Still not exactly human readable, but no bit mapping needed.
If maximum readibility (and not terseness) were the primary driver, would there be a better option?
permissions chmod
permissions chmod
asked 8 hours ago
GaTechThomasGaTechThomas
1112 bronze badges
1112 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
With a=,u=r
, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a=
and u=r
(or the order of a=
and u=
), the result would be very different. (Yes, a
and u
are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:
chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst
The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx
first or u=r
first.
New contributor
That makes a lot of sense.
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
@GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.
– chmod a-rwx
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1153204%2fsymbolic-equivalent-of-chmod-400%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
With a=,u=r
, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a=
and u=r
(or the order of a=
and u=
), the result would be very different. (Yes, a
and u
are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:
chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst
The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx
first or u=r
first.
New contributor
That makes a lot of sense.
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
@GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.
– chmod a-rwx
8 hours ago
add a comment |
With a=,u=r
, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a=
and u=r
(or the order of a=
and u=
), the result would be very different. (Yes, a
and u
are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:
chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst
The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx
first or u=r
first.
New contributor
That makes a lot of sense.
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
@GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.
– chmod a-rwx
8 hours ago
add a comment |
With a=,u=r
, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a=
and u=r
(or the order of a=
and u=
), the result would be very different. (Yes, a
and u
are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:
chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst
The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx
first or u=r
first.
New contributor
With a=,u=r
, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a=
and u=r
(or the order of a=
and u=
), the result would be very different. (Yes, a
and u
are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:
chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst
The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx
first or u=r
first.
New contributor
edited 6 hours ago
New contributor
answered 8 hours ago
chmod a-rwxchmod a-rwx
412 bronze badges
412 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
That makes a lot of sense.
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
@GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.
– chmod a-rwx
8 hours ago
add a comment |
That makes a lot of sense.
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
@GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.
– chmod a-rwx
8 hours ago
That makes a lot of sense.
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
That makes a lot of sense.
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
@GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.
– chmod a-rwx
8 hours ago
@GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.
– chmod a-rwx
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1153204%2fsymbolic-equivalent-of-chmod-400%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown