As easy as Three, Two, One… How fast can you go from Five to Four?Word Ladder puzzleFrom Puzzling to StackExchangeWord ladder island (formerly dead-end)Change a letter, add a letterGet from AXLE to TIZZYes, your fat ma is hersThaw Sue's cold dogTurn Lead into GOLDFrom bottom to topWant to go from DALLAS to LONDON via BERLIN

That's not my X, its Y is too Z

What plausible reason could I give for my FTL drive only working in space

How can one's career as a reviewer be ended?

What would be the way to say "just saying" in German? (Not the literal translation)

As easy as Three, Two, One... How fast can you go from Five to Four?

Accessing /systemTopic/ streaming channel

Does the new finding on "reversing a quantum jump mid-flight" rule out any interpretations of QM?

I've been given a project I can't complete, what should I do?

Is there a DSLR/mirorless camera with minimal options like a classic, simple SLR?

Are the guests in Westworld forbidden to tell the hosts that they are robots?

If there's something that implicates the president why is there then a national security issue? (John Dowd)

Can you make an identity from this product?

Are polynomials with the same roots identical?

Does a (nice) centerless group always have a centerless profinite completion?

Is it possible to have 2 different but equal size real number sets that have the same mean and standard deviation?

Is it safe to remove python 2.7.15rc1 from Ubuntu 18.04?

noalign caused by multirow and colors

Why isn't Bash trap working if output is redirected to stdout?

Is it okay to have a sequel start immediately after the end of the first book?

Analogy between an unknown in an argument, and a contradiction in the principle of explosion

Transfer custom ringtones to iPhone using a computer running Linux

The significance of kelvin as a unit of absolute temperature

Does putting salt first make it easier for attacker to bruteforce the hash?

Flat with smooth fibers implies formally smooth?



As easy as Three, Two, One… How fast can you go from Five to Four?


Word Ladder puzzleFrom Puzzling to StackExchangeWord ladder island (formerly dead-end)Change a letter, add a letterGet from AXLE to TIZZYes, your fat ma is hersThaw Sue's cold dogTurn Lead into GOLDFrom bottom to topWant to go from DALLAS to LONDON via BERLIN













8












$begingroup$


You have to reach Four from Five in minimum number of tries with the following rules.



You are only allowed to change one letter at a time.
You have to keep the word length the same.



For example: How do you go from $LAND$ to $SANE$?



$LAND$ $rightarrow$ $SAND$ (1) $rightarrow$ $SANE$ (2). Done in 2 steps.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Would it be worth investigating what the longest path would be (without using any word multiple times)?
    $endgroup$
    – Cloudy7
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Definitely...working on a puzzle along those lines..hopefully, I will have it out in next 3 days or so.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Cloudy7 Finding the longest path sounds like an open-ended puzzle, which are now off-topic :-(
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    3 hours ago















8












$begingroup$


You have to reach Four from Five in minimum number of tries with the following rules.



You are only allowed to change one letter at a time.
You have to keep the word length the same.



For example: How do you go from $LAND$ to $SANE$?



$LAND$ $rightarrow$ $SAND$ (1) $rightarrow$ $SANE$ (2). Done in 2 steps.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Would it be worth investigating what the longest path would be (without using any word multiple times)?
    $endgroup$
    – Cloudy7
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Definitely...working on a puzzle along those lines..hopefully, I will have it out in next 3 days or so.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Cloudy7 Finding the longest path sounds like an open-ended puzzle, which are now off-topic :-(
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    3 hours ago













8












8








8





$begingroup$


You have to reach Four from Five in minimum number of tries with the following rules.



You are only allowed to change one letter at a time.
You have to keep the word length the same.



For example: How do you go from $LAND$ to $SANE$?



$LAND$ $rightarrow$ $SAND$ (1) $rightarrow$ $SANE$ (2). Done in 2 steps.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




You have to reach Four from Five in minimum number of tries with the following rules.



You are only allowed to change one letter at a time.
You have to keep the word length the same.



For example: How do you go from $LAND$ to $SANE$?



$LAND$ $rightarrow$ $SAND$ (1) $rightarrow$ $SANE$ (2). Done in 2 steps.







word wordplay letters word-ladder






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago









João Bravo

6511




6511










asked 9 hours ago









UvcUvc

1,450221




1,450221











  • $begingroup$
    Would it be worth investigating what the longest path would be (without using any word multiple times)?
    $endgroup$
    – Cloudy7
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Definitely...working on a puzzle along those lines..hopefully, I will have it out in next 3 days or so.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Cloudy7 Finding the longest path sounds like an open-ended puzzle, which are now off-topic :-(
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Would it be worth investigating what the longest path would be (without using any word multiple times)?
    $endgroup$
    – Cloudy7
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Definitely...working on a puzzle along those lines..hopefully, I will have it out in next 3 days or so.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Cloudy7 Finding the longest path sounds like an open-ended puzzle, which are now off-topic :-(
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
Would it be worth investigating what the longest path would be (without using any word multiple times)?
$endgroup$
– Cloudy7
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Would it be worth investigating what the longest path would be (without using any word multiple times)?
$endgroup$
– Cloudy7
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
Definitely...working on a puzzle along those lines..hopefully, I will have it out in next 3 days or so.
$endgroup$
– Uvc
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Definitely...working on a puzzle along those lines..hopefully, I will have it out in next 3 days or so.
$endgroup$
– Uvc
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Cloudy7 Finding the longest path sounds like an open-ended puzzle, which are now off-topic :-(
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Cloudy7 Finding the longest path sounds like an open-ended puzzle, which are now off-topic :-(
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
3 hours ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Just signed up to share some of the solutions (3 of them) I was able to come up with in 6 steps:




1) FIVE $rightarrow$ FAVE $rightarrow$ FARE $rightarrow$ FART $rightarrow$ FAUT $rightarrow$ FAUR $rightarrow$ FOUR

2) FIVE $rightarrow$ FAVE $rightarrow$ FACE $rightarrow$ FACT $rightarrow$ FAUT $rightarrow$ FAUR $rightarrow$ FOUR

3) FIVE $rightarrow$ DIVE $rightarrow$ DOVE $rightarrow$ DORE $rightarrow$ DORR $rightarrow$ DOUR $rightarrow$ FOUR




OH MAN! After a lot of searching I was able to do it in 5 steps (3 solutions):




1) FIVE $rightarrow$ FIRE $rightarrow$ ... FORE .... $rightarrow$ FORD $rightarrow$ FOUD $rightarrow$ FOUR

2) FIVE $rightarrow$ FINE $rightarrow$ FIND/FONE $rightarrow$ FOND $rightarrow$ FOUD $rightarrow$ FOUR

3) FIVE $rightarrow$ FINE $rightarrow$ FINS/FONE $rightarrow$ FONS $rightarrow$ FOUS $rightarrow$ FOUR




I confirmed the words on Anagrammer.






share|improve this answer










New contributor



João Bravo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nice! Welcome to the site, and +1.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    That’s awesome..unless someday comes with four which is very unlikely, you will get the greencheck soon.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I spent quite a bit trying to come up with a 4-step solution without success. I would be extremely impressed if someone came up with one.
    $endgroup$
    – João Bravo
    5 hours ago


















4












$begingroup$

I can do it in




7 steps: five fire fore fort port pout pour four.




With one more obscure word, I can do it in




6 steps: five fire tire tore torr tour four.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Absolute minimum is obviously three..I wrote down in 7 without optimization..it will be fascinating to see if somebody can come up with a 5 step solution to better yours.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Three is definitely not possible because none of FOVE, FIUE, FIVR is a word.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    True..I just made a general statement regarding the minimum steps needed..in the example I cited, was able to do in 2 because middle letters were same. In general, absolute minimum would be..total letters - number of common letters in starting and ending words
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago


















3












$begingroup$

I found a solution in seven steps.




FIVE - FILE

FILE - FILL

FILL - FALL

FALL - FAIL

FAIL - FOIL

FOIL - FOUL

FOUL - FOUR







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Ha! Ninjaed you by nine seconds (though, oops, I wrote mine down in reverse order, which I'll fix).
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is fascinating to see how each mind works through intermediate steps...I went through “Fire” to “Four”.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago


















3












$begingroup$

Seven steps (with some obscurer words):




FOUR

LOUR

LOUK

LOCK

LICK

LICE

FICE

FIVE




Something that might lead to five, if it can be completed:




FIVE

FIRE

FIRM

FORM




That's three steps from FIVE to something that shares two letters with FOUR.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    And I see others have beaten me to seven even without obscure words ...
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Interesting..in mine..F was never changed..still Ineeded seven..it would be really great if we can find 5 step solution at least.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    To make your partial thing into a five you'd need either FOUM or FORR to be a word, and I think neither is one.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    9 hours ago


















1












$begingroup$

In this answer I will show that five steps is the minimum number required (from the answer by @JoãoBravo).




Suppose by contradiction that there are four. Then the sequence will be of the form



F i v e, _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _, F o u r.



If the first letter remains unchanged the whole way through, the sequence is



F i v e, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.



Therefore, at each step, one of i v e must be changed to match o u r, without any deviations. This is clearly impossible.



Now suppose that the first letter is changed to a letter ¬ the whole way through. Then the sequence is



F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.



However, changing from i v e to o u r requires three steps, which are not allowed in this arrangement as the first and fourth steps are wasted.



Thus the only combinations left are




  1. F i v e, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.

This is also impossible as there are not enough steps (one) to change from i v e to o u r.




  1. F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.

Steps two and three are pointless/a waste of steps so this case can be easily discarded.




  1. F i v e, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.

Yet again, steps three and four are useless for the same reason above.




  1. F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.

There are not enough steps to make the transition i v e to o u r as the third step is wasted in converting ¬ to F.




  1. F i v e, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.

Again, not sufficient due to the same reasoning above.




  1. F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.

This is also useless.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes..for this case, it is true...my upcoming puzzle will lend to lot of interesting analysis like this.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    5 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84854%2fas-easy-as-three-two-one-how-fast-can-you-go-from-five-to-four%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes








5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6












$begingroup$

Just signed up to share some of the solutions (3 of them) I was able to come up with in 6 steps:




1) FIVE $rightarrow$ FAVE $rightarrow$ FARE $rightarrow$ FART $rightarrow$ FAUT $rightarrow$ FAUR $rightarrow$ FOUR

2) FIVE $rightarrow$ FAVE $rightarrow$ FACE $rightarrow$ FACT $rightarrow$ FAUT $rightarrow$ FAUR $rightarrow$ FOUR

3) FIVE $rightarrow$ DIVE $rightarrow$ DOVE $rightarrow$ DORE $rightarrow$ DORR $rightarrow$ DOUR $rightarrow$ FOUR




OH MAN! After a lot of searching I was able to do it in 5 steps (3 solutions):




1) FIVE $rightarrow$ FIRE $rightarrow$ ... FORE .... $rightarrow$ FORD $rightarrow$ FOUD $rightarrow$ FOUR

2) FIVE $rightarrow$ FINE $rightarrow$ FIND/FONE $rightarrow$ FOND $rightarrow$ FOUD $rightarrow$ FOUR

3) FIVE $rightarrow$ FINE $rightarrow$ FINS/FONE $rightarrow$ FONS $rightarrow$ FOUS $rightarrow$ FOUR




I confirmed the words on Anagrammer.






share|improve this answer










New contributor



João Bravo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nice! Welcome to the site, and +1.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    That’s awesome..unless someday comes with four which is very unlikely, you will get the greencheck soon.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I spent quite a bit trying to come up with a 4-step solution without success. I would be extremely impressed if someone came up with one.
    $endgroup$
    – João Bravo
    5 hours ago















6












$begingroup$

Just signed up to share some of the solutions (3 of them) I was able to come up with in 6 steps:




1) FIVE $rightarrow$ FAVE $rightarrow$ FARE $rightarrow$ FART $rightarrow$ FAUT $rightarrow$ FAUR $rightarrow$ FOUR

2) FIVE $rightarrow$ FAVE $rightarrow$ FACE $rightarrow$ FACT $rightarrow$ FAUT $rightarrow$ FAUR $rightarrow$ FOUR

3) FIVE $rightarrow$ DIVE $rightarrow$ DOVE $rightarrow$ DORE $rightarrow$ DORR $rightarrow$ DOUR $rightarrow$ FOUR




OH MAN! After a lot of searching I was able to do it in 5 steps (3 solutions):




1) FIVE $rightarrow$ FIRE $rightarrow$ ... FORE .... $rightarrow$ FORD $rightarrow$ FOUD $rightarrow$ FOUR

2) FIVE $rightarrow$ FINE $rightarrow$ FIND/FONE $rightarrow$ FOND $rightarrow$ FOUD $rightarrow$ FOUR

3) FIVE $rightarrow$ FINE $rightarrow$ FINS/FONE $rightarrow$ FONS $rightarrow$ FOUS $rightarrow$ FOUR




I confirmed the words on Anagrammer.






share|improve this answer










New contributor



João Bravo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nice! Welcome to the site, and +1.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    That’s awesome..unless someday comes with four which is very unlikely, you will get the greencheck soon.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I spent quite a bit trying to come up with a 4-step solution without success. I would be extremely impressed if someone came up with one.
    $endgroup$
    – João Bravo
    5 hours ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$

Just signed up to share some of the solutions (3 of them) I was able to come up with in 6 steps:




1) FIVE $rightarrow$ FAVE $rightarrow$ FARE $rightarrow$ FART $rightarrow$ FAUT $rightarrow$ FAUR $rightarrow$ FOUR

2) FIVE $rightarrow$ FAVE $rightarrow$ FACE $rightarrow$ FACT $rightarrow$ FAUT $rightarrow$ FAUR $rightarrow$ FOUR

3) FIVE $rightarrow$ DIVE $rightarrow$ DOVE $rightarrow$ DORE $rightarrow$ DORR $rightarrow$ DOUR $rightarrow$ FOUR




OH MAN! After a lot of searching I was able to do it in 5 steps (3 solutions):




1) FIVE $rightarrow$ FIRE $rightarrow$ ... FORE .... $rightarrow$ FORD $rightarrow$ FOUD $rightarrow$ FOUR

2) FIVE $rightarrow$ FINE $rightarrow$ FIND/FONE $rightarrow$ FOND $rightarrow$ FOUD $rightarrow$ FOUR

3) FIVE $rightarrow$ FINE $rightarrow$ FINS/FONE $rightarrow$ FONS $rightarrow$ FOUS $rightarrow$ FOUR




I confirmed the words on Anagrammer.






share|improve this answer










New contributor



João Bravo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





$endgroup$



Just signed up to share some of the solutions (3 of them) I was able to come up with in 6 steps:




1) FIVE $rightarrow$ FAVE $rightarrow$ FARE $rightarrow$ FART $rightarrow$ FAUT $rightarrow$ FAUR $rightarrow$ FOUR

2) FIVE $rightarrow$ FAVE $rightarrow$ FACE $rightarrow$ FACT $rightarrow$ FAUT $rightarrow$ FAUR $rightarrow$ FOUR

3) FIVE $rightarrow$ DIVE $rightarrow$ DOVE $rightarrow$ DORE $rightarrow$ DORR $rightarrow$ DOUR $rightarrow$ FOUR




OH MAN! After a lot of searching I was able to do it in 5 steps (3 solutions):




1) FIVE $rightarrow$ FIRE $rightarrow$ ... FORE .... $rightarrow$ FORD $rightarrow$ FOUD $rightarrow$ FOUR

2) FIVE $rightarrow$ FINE $rightarrow$ FIND/FONE $rightarrow$ FOND $rightarrow$ FOUD $rightarrow$ FOUR

3) FIVE $rightarrow$ FINE $rightarrow$ FINS/FONE $rightarrow$ FONS $rightarrow$ FOUS $rightarrow$ FOUR




I confirmed the words on Anagrammer.







share|improve this answer










New contributor



João Bravo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 3 hours ago









Rand al'Thor

73.2k14240484




73.2k14240484






New contributor



João Bravo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








answered 6 hours ago









João BravoJoão Bravo

6511




6511




New contributor



João Bravo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




João Bravo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nice! Welcome to the site, and +1.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    That’s awesome..unless someday comes with four which is very unlikely, you will get the greencheck soon.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I spent quite a bit trying to come up with a 4-step solution without success. I would be extremely impressed if someone came up with one.
    $endgroup$
    – João Bravo
    5 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nice! Welcome to the site, and +1.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    That’s awesome..unless someday comes with four which is very unlikely, you will get the greencheck soon.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I spent quite a bit trying to come up with a 4-step solution without success. I would be extremely impressed if someone came up with one.
    $endgroup$
    – João Bravo
    5 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
Nice! Welcome to the site, and +1.
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Nice! Welcome to the site, and +1.
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
That’s awesome..unless someday comes with four which is very unlikely, you will get the greencheck soon.
$endgroup$
– Uvc
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
That’s awesome..unless someday comes with four which is very unlikely, you will get the greencheck soon.
$endgroup$
– Uvc
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
I spent quite a bit trying to come up with a 4-step solution without success. I would be extremely impressed if someone came up with one.
$endgroup$
– João Bravo
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
I spent quite a bit trying to come up with a 4-step solution without success. I would be extremely impressed if someone came up with one.
$endgroup$
– João Bravo
5 hours ago











4












$begingroup$

I can do it in




7 steps: five fire fore fort port pout pour four.




With one more obscure word, I can do it in




6 steps: five fire tire tore torr tour four.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Absolute minimum is obviously three..I wrote down in 7 without optimization..it will be fascinating to see if somebody can come up with a 5 step solution to better yours.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Three is definitely not possible because none of FOVE, FIUE, FIVR is a word.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    True..I just made a general statement regarding the minimum steps needed..in the example I cited, was able to do in 2 because middle letters were same. In general, absolute minimum would be..total letters - number of common letters in starting and ending words
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago















4












$begingroup$

I can do it in




7 steps: five fire fore fort port pout pour four.




With one more obscure word, I can do it in




6 steps: five fire tire tore torr tour four.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Absolute minimum is obviously three..I wrote down in 7 without optimization..it will be fascinating to see if somebody can come up with a 5 step solution to better yours.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Three is definitely not possible because none of FOVE, FIUE, FIVR is a word.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    True..I just made a general statement regarding the minimum steps needed..in the example I cited, was able to do in 2 because middle letters were same. In general, absolute minimum would be..total letters - number of common letters in starting and ending words
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$

I can do it in




7 steps: five fire fore fort port pout pour four.




With one more obscure word, I can do it in




6 steps: five fire tire tore torr tour four.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



I can do it in




7 steps: five fire fore fort port pout pour four.




With one more obscure word, I can do it in




6 steps: five fire tire tore torr tour four.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 9 hours ago

























answered 9 hours ago









Gareth McCaughanGareth McCaughan

73.9k3184284




73.9k3184284











  • $begingroup$
    Absolute minimum is obviously three..I wrote down in 7 without optimization..it will be fascinating to see if somebody can come up with a 5 step solution to better yours.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Three is definitely not possible because none of FOVE, FIUE, FIVR is a word.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    True..I just made a general statement regarding the minimum steps needed..in the example I cited, was able to do in 2 because middle letters were same. In general, absolute minimum would be..total letters - number of common letters in starting and ending words
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Absolute minimum is obviously three..I wrote down in 7 without optimization..it will be fascinating to see if somebody can come up with a 5 step solution to better yours.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Three is definitely not possible because none of FOVE, FIUE, FIVR is a word.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    True..I just made a general statement regarding the minimum steps needed..in the example I cited, was able to do in 2 because middle letters were same. In general, absolute minimum would be..total letters - number of common letters in starting and ending words
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago















$begingroup$
Absolute minimum is obviously three..I wrote down in 7 without optimization..it will be fascinating to see if somebody can come up with a 5 step solution to better yours.
$endgroup$
– Uvc
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Absolute minimum is obviously three..I wrote down in 7 without optimization..it will be fascinating to see if somebody can come up with a 5 step solution to better yours.
$endgroup$
– Uvc
9 hours ago












$begingroup$
Three is definitely not possible because none of FOVE, FIUE, FIVR is a word.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Three is definitely not possible because none of FOVE, FIUE, FIVR is a word.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
9 hours ago












$begingroup$
True..I just made a general statement regarding the minimum steps needed..in the example I cited, was able to do in 2 because middle letters were same. In general, absolute minimum would be..total letters - number of common letters in starting and ending words
$endgroup$
– Uvc
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
True..I just made a general statement regarding the minimum steps needed..in the example I cited, was able to do in 2 because middle letters were same. In general, absolute minimum would be..total letters - number of common letters in starting and ending words
$endgroup$
– Uvc
9 hours ago











3












$begingroup$

I found a solution in seven steps.




FIVE - FILE

FILE - FILL

FILL - FALL

FALL - FAIL

FAIL - FOIL

FOIL - FOUL

FOUL - FOUR







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Ha! Ninjaed you by nine seconds (though, oops, I wrote mine down in reverse order, which I'll fix).
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is fascinating to see how each mind works through intermediate steps...I went through “Fire” to “Four”.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago















3












$begingroup$

I found a solution in seven steps.




FIVE - FILE

FILE - FILL

FILL - FALL

FALL - FAIL

FAIL - FOIL

FOIL - FOUL

FOUL - FOUR







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Ha! Ninjaed you by nine seconds (though, oops, I wrote mine down in reverse order, which I'll fix).
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is fascinating to see how each mind works through intermediate steps...I went through “Fire” to “Four”.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$

I found a solution in seven steps.




FIVE - FILE

FILE - FILL

FILL - FALL

FALL - FAIL

FAIL - FOIL

FOIL - FOUL

FOUL - FOUR







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



I found a solution in seven steps.




FIVE - FILE

FILE - FILL

FILL - FALL

FALL - FAIL

FAIL - FOIL

FOIL - FOUL

FOUL - FOUR








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 9 hours ago









Herb WolfeHerb Wolfe

2,28911021




2,28911021











  • $begingroup$
    Ha! Ninjaed you by nine seconds (though, oops, I wrote mine down in reverse order, which I'll fix).
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is fascinating to see how each mind works through intermediate steps...I went through “Fire” to “Four”.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Ha! Ninjaed you by nine seconds (though, oops, I wrote mine down in reverse order, which I'll fix).
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is fascinating to see how each mind works through intermediate steps...I went through “Fire” to “Four”.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago















$begingroup$
Ha! Ninjaed you by nine seconds (though, oops, I wrote mine down in reverse order, which I'll fix).
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Ha! Ninjaed you by nine seconds (though, oops, I wrote mine down in reverse order, which I'll fix).
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
9 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
It is fascinating to see how each mind works through intermediate steps...I went through “Fire” to “Four”.
$endgroup$
– Uvc
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
It is fascinating to see how each mind works through intermediate steps...I went through “Fire” to “Four”.
$endgroup$
– Uvc
9 hours ago











3












$begingroup$

Seven steps (with some obscurer words):




FOUR

LOUR

LOUK

LOCK

LICK

LICE

FICE

FIVE




Something that might lead to five, if it can be completed:




FIVE

FIRE

FIRM

FORM




That's three steps from FIVE to something that shares two letters with FOUR.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    And I see others have beaten me to seven even without obscure words ...
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Interesting..in mine..F was never changed..still Ineeded seven..it would be really great if we can find 5 step solution at least.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    To make your partial thing into a five you'd need either FOUM or FORR to be a word, and I think neither is one.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    9 hours ago















3












$begingroup$

Seven steps (with some obscurer words):




FOUR

LOUR

LOUK

LOCK

LICK

LICE

FICE

FIVE




Something that might lead to five, if it can be completed:




FIVE

FIRE

FIRM

FORM




That's three steps from FIVE to something that shares two letters with FOUR.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    And I see others have beaten me to seven even without obscure words ...
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Interesting..in mine..F was never changed..still Ineeded seven..it would be really great if we can find 5 step solution at least.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    To make your partial thing into a five you'd need either FOUM or FORR to be a word, and I think neither is one.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    9 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$

Seven steps (with some obscurer words):




FOUR

LOUR

LOUK

LOCK

LICK

LICE

FICE

FIVE




Something that might lead to five, if it can be completed:




FIVE

FIRE

FIRM

FORM




That's three steps from FIVE to something that shares two letters with FOUR.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Seven steps (with some obscurer words):




FOUR

LOUR

LOUK

LOCK

LICK

LICE

FICE

FIVE




Something that might lead to five, if it can be completed:




FIVE

FIRE

FIRM

FORM




That's three steps from FIVE to something that shares two letters with FOUR.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 9 hours ago

























answered 9 hours ago









Rand al'ThorRand al'Thor

73.2k14240484




73.2k14240484











  • $begingroup$
    And I see others have beaten me to seven even without obscure words ...
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Interesting..in mine..F was never changed..still Ineeded seven..it would be really great if we can find 5 step solution at least.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    To make your partial thing into a five you'd need either FOUM or FORR to be a word, and I think neither is one.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    9 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    And I see others have beaten me to seven even without obscure words ...
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Interesting..in mine..F was never changed..still Ineeded seven..it would be really great if we can find 5 step solution at least.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    To make your partial thing into a five you'd need either FOUM or FORR to be a word, and I think neither is one.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    9 hours ago















$begingroup$
And I see others have beaten me to seven even without obscure words ...
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
And I see others have beaten me to seven even without obscure words ...
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
9 hours ago












$begingroup$
Interesting..in mine..F was never changed..still Ineeded seven..it would be really great if we can find 5 step solution at least.
$endgroup$
– Uvc
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Interesting..in mine..F was never changed..still Ineeded seven..it would be really great if we can find 5 step solution at least.
$endgroup$
– Uvc
9 hours ago












$begingroup$
To make your partial thing into a five you'd need either FOUM or FORR to be a word, and I think neither is one.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
To make your partial thing into a five you'd need either FOUM or FORR to be a word, and I think neither is one.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
9 hours ago











1












$begingroup$

In this answer I will show that five steps is the minimum number required (from the answer by @JoãoBravo).




Suppose by contradiction that there are four. Then the sequence will be of the form



F i v e, _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _, F o u r.



If the first letter remains unchanged the whole way through, the sequence is



F i v e, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.



Therefore, at each step, one of i v e must be changed to match o u r, without any deviations. This is clearly impossible.



Now suppose that the first letter is changed to a letter ¬ the whole way through. Then the sequence is



F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.



However, changing from i v e to o u r requires three steps, which are not allowed in this arrangement as the first and fourth steps are wasted.



Thus the only combinations left are




  1. F i v e, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.

This is also impossible as there are not enough steps (one) to change from i v e to o u r.




  1. F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.

Steps two and three are pointless/a waste of steps so this case can be easily discarded.




  1. F i v e, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.

Yet again, steps three and four are useless for the same reason above.




  1. F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.

There are not enough steps to make the transition i v e to o u r as the third step is wasted in converting ¬ to F.




  1. F i v e, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.

Again, not sufficient due to the same reasoning above.




  1. F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.

This is also useless.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes..for this case, it is true...my upcoming puzzle will lend to lot of interesting analysis like this.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    5 hours ago















1












$begingroup$

In this answer I will show that five steps is the minimum number required (from the answer by @JoãoBravo).




Suppose by contradiction that there are four. Then the sequence will be of the form



F i v e, _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _, F o u r.



If the first letter remains unchanged the whole way through, the sequence is



F i v e, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.



Therefore, at each step, one of i v e must be changed to match o u r, without any deviations. This is clearly impossible.



Now suppose that the first letter is changed to a letter ¬ the whole way through. Then the sequence is



F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.



However, changing from i v e to o u r requires three steps, which are not allowed in this arrangement as the first and fourth steps are wasted.



Thus the only combinations left are




  1. F i v e, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.

This is also impossible as there are not enough steps (one) to change from i v e to o u r.




  1. F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.

Steps two and three are pointless/a waste of steps so this case can be easily discarded.




  1. F i v e, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.

Yet again, steps three and four are useless for the same reason above.




  1. F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.

There are not enough steps to make the transition i v e to o u r as the third step is wasted in converting ¬ to F.




  1. F i v e, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.

Again, not sufficient due to the same reasoning above.




  1. F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.

This is also useless.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes..for this case, it is true...my upcoming puzzle will lend to lot of interesting analysis like this.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    5 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$

In this answer I will show that five steps is the minimum number required (from the answer by @JoãoBravo).




Suppose by contradiction that there are four. Then the sequence will be of the form



F i v e, _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _, F o u r.



If the first letter remains unchanged the whole way through, the sequence is



F i v e, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.



Therefore, at each step, one of i v e must be changed to match o u r, without any deviations. This is clearly impossible.



Now suppose that the first letter is changed to a letter ¬ the whole way through. Then the sequence is



F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.



However, changing from i v e to o u r requires three steps, which are not allowed in this arrangement as the first and fourth steps are wasted.



Thus the only combinations left are




  1. F i v e, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.

This is also impossible as there are not enough steps (one) to change from i v e to o u r.




  1. F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.

Steps two and three are pointless/a waste of steps so this case can be easily discarded.




  1. F i v e, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.

Yet again, steps three and four are useless for the same reason above.




  1. F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.

There are not enough steps to make the transition i v e to o u r as the third step is wasted in converting ¬ to F.




  1. F i v e, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.

Again, not sufficient due to the same reasoning above.




  1. F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.

This is also useless.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



In this answer I will show that five steps is the minimum number required (from the answer by @JoãoBravo).




Suppose by contradiction that there are four. Then the sequence will be of the form



F i v e, _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _, F o u r.



If the first letter remains unchanged the whole way through, the sequence is



F i v e, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.



Therefore, at each step, one of i v e must be changed to match o u r, without any deviations. This is clearly impossible.



Now suppose that the first letter is changed to a letter ¬ the whole way through. Then the sequence is



F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.



However, changing from i v e to o u r requires three steps, which are not allowed in this arrangement as the first and fourth steps are wasted.



Thus the only combinations left are




  1. F i v e, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.

This is also impossible as there are not enough steps (one) to change from i v e to o u r.




  1. F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.

Steps two and three are pointless/a waste of steps so this case can be easily discarded.




  1. F i v e, F _ _ _, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.

Yet again, steps three and four are useless for the same reason above.




  1. F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.

There are not enough steps to make the transition i v e to o u r as the third step is wasted in converting ¬ to F.




  1. F i v e, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, F o u r.

Again, not sufficient due to the same reasoning above.




  1. F i v e, ¬ _ _ _, F _ _ _, ¬ _ _ _, F o u r.

This is also useless.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 5 hours ago









TheSimpliFireTheSimpliFire

2,351534




2,351534











  • $begingroup$
    Yes..for this case, it is true...my upcoming puzzle will lend to lot of interesting analysis like this.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    5 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Yes..for this case, it is true...my upcoming puzzle will lend to lot of interesting analysis like this.
    $endgroup$
    – Uvc
    5 hours ago















$begingroup$
Yes..for this case, it is true...my upcoming puzzle will lend to lot of interesting analysis like this.
$endgroup$
– Uvc
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Yes..for this case, it is true...my upcoming puzzle will lend to lot of interesting analysis like this.
$endgroup$
– Uvc
5 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84854%2fas-easy-as-three-two-one-how-fast-can-you-go-from-five-to-four%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480