Multiband vertical antenna not working as expectedVertical antenna on HF?Should I chose a vertical or a horizontal HF antenna?Antenna Tripod for a vertical antennaTheoretical Wifi antenna not working for the expected range2 Meter horizontal or vertical dipole polarization?Why a thousand miles long antenna is not needed to receive LW and MW?What material is best to design a dipole antenna working at VHF frequency?2m Biquad - Why not?Why does not a bigger antenna receive more power?Triband vertical antenna 6/2/70

Can there be absolute velocity?

What would be the way to say "just saying" in German? (Not the literal translation)

Use 1 9 6 2 in this order to make 75

Analogy between an unknown in an argument, and a contradiction in the principle of explosion

noalign caused by multirow and colors

Hatch with Shading

The origin of the Russian proverb about two hares

Does a (nice) centerless group always have a centerless profinite completion?

Rail-to-rail op-amp only reaches 90% of VCC, works sometimes, not everytime

Do you have to have figures when playing D&D?

What is the reason for setting flaps 1 on the ground at high temperatures?

Is Dumbledore a human lie detector?

Do empty drive bays need to be filled?

empApi with Lightning Web Components?

Multiband vertical antenna not working as expected

bash vs. zsh: What are the practical differences?

The significance of kelvin as a unit of absolute temperature

Suppose leased car is totalled: what are financial implications?

How to avoid typing 'git' at the begining of every Git command

Confused with atmospheric pressure equals plastic balloon’s inner pressure

How durable are silver inlays on a blade?

How can one's career as a reviewer be ended?

What differences exist between adamantine and adamantite in all editions of D&D?

Do you need to let the DM know when you are multiclassing?



Multiband vertical antenna not working as expected


Vertical antenna on HF?Should I chose a vertical or a horizontal HF antenna?Antenna Tripod for a vertical antennaTheoretical Wifi antenna not working for the expected range2 Meter horizontal or vertical dipole polarization?Why a thousand miles long antenna is not needed to receive LW and MW?What material is best to design a dipole antenna working at VHF frequency?2m Biquad - Why not?Why does not a bigger antenna receive more power?Triband vertical antenna 6/2/70













3












$begingroup$


I built a vertical out of a 5M aluminium pipe. It tunes fine (and wide!) on 20M.
I decided to add a loading coil to operate it on 40M, and it also worked fine, albeit not so wide.
While I was at it, I extended the coil for operation on 80M as well. It became super narrow! But it worked.



To test this, I used crocodile wires to bite into the coil. I decided make a remote switch out of relays. But it's not working as expected when operating 80M. The SWR jumps around like crazy on my meter, and at some point it just stays inifinite.



This is what I built:



enter image description here



What I suspect is that when both relays are off, there is a very high voltage across the relays and an arc forms, due to the high Q of the coil.
This does not happen when the 40 or 20M relays are activated. The antenna works more or less as expected when the 40 or 20M relays are active.



Could this be the problem? Could it be solved somehow?



I thought of using traps instead of relays to make the antenna "auto switching", but I'm not sure if traps would add more loss than the relays, or if they would whitstand the high voltages appearing on the coil.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What relays are you using?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    7 hours ago















3












$begingroup$


I built a vertical out of a 5M aluminium pipe. It tunes fine (and wide!) on 20M.
I decided to add a loading coil to operate it on 40M, and it also worked fine, albeit not so wide.
While I was at it, I extended the coil for operation on 80M as well. It became super narrow! But it worked.



To test this, I used crocodile wires to bite into the coil. I decided make a remote switch out of relays. But it's not working as expected when operating 80M. The SWR jumps around like crazy on my meter, and at some point it just stays inifinite.



This is what I built:



enter image description here



What I suspect is that when both relays are off, there is a very high voltage across the relays and an arc forms, due to the high Q of the coil.
This does not happen when the 40 or 20M relays are activated. The antenna works more or less as expected when the 40 or 20M relays are active.



Could this be the problem? Could it be solved somehow?



I thought of using traps instead of relays to make the antenna "auto switching", but I'm not sure if traps would add more loss than the relays, or if they would whitstand the high voltages appearing on the coil.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What relays are you using?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    7 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$


I built a vertical out of a 5M aluminium pipe. It tunes fine (and wide!) on 20M.
I decided to add a loading coil to operate it on 40M, and it also worked fine, albeit not so wide.
While I was at it, I extended the coil for operation on 80M as well. It became super narrow! But it worked.



To test this, I used crocodile wires to bite into the coil. I decided make a remote switch out of relays. But it's not working as expected when operating 80M. The SWR jumps around like crazy on my meter, and at some point it just stays inifinite.



This is what I built:



enter image description here



What I suspect is that when both relays are off, there is a very high voltage across the relays and an arc forms, due to the high Q of the coil.
This does not happen when the 40 or 20M relays are activated. The antenna works more or less as expected when the 40 or 20M relays are active.



Could this be the problem? Could it be solved somehow?



I thought of using traps instead of relays to make the antenna "auto switching", but I'm not sure if traps would add more loss than the relays, or if they would whitstand the high voltages appearing on the coil.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I built a vertical out of a 5M aluminium pipe. It tunes fine (and wide!) on 20M.
I decided to add a loading coil to operate it on 40M, and it also worked fine, albeit not so wide.
While I was at it, I extended the coil for operation on 80M as well. It became super narrow! But it worked.



To test this, I used crocodile wires to bite into the coil. I decided make a remote switch out of relays. But it's not working as expected when operating 80M. The SWR jumps around like crazy on my meter, and at some point it just stays inifinite.



This is what I built:



enter image description here



What I suspect is that when both relays are off, there is a very high voltage across the relays and an arc forms, due to the high Q of the coil.
This does not happen when the 40 or 20M relays are activated. The antenna works more or less as expected when the 40 or 20M relays are active.



Could this be the problem? Could it be solved somehow?



I thought of using traps instead of relays to make the antenna "auto switching", but I'm not sure if traps would add more loss than the relays, or if they would whitstand the high voltages appearing on the coil.







antenna vertical






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 9 hours ago









hjfhjf

1813




1813











  • $begingroup$
    What relays are you using?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    7 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    What relays are you using?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    7 hours ago















$begingroup$
What relays are you using?
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
What relays are you using?
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
7 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

It may very well be that the open contacts are arcing, and I'm betting that's what is happening.



Here are some possible solutions. How about using different relays that have less tendency to arc:



  1. Open-frame relays with much wider contact spacing

  2. Vacuum relays

  3. Multiple relays in series

Another possibility might be that RF on the control lines may be activating the relays. Suitable RF chokes and bypass capacitors might help that.



It's a myth that all traps are lossy. If they don't get hot to the touch at sustained 100W or higher, then their loss is insignificant. Scroll to the bottom of https://www.w8ji.com/traps.htm:


3.) Do traps create noticeable loss, perhaps one dB per trap typically?



NO! Even the worst traps (coaxial traps) in the worse possible condition of operation are only 1.6dB loss for BOTH traps!







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What about these? tme.com/ar/es/details/li05-1a85/reles-electromagn-de-lengueta/… they are inexpensive reed relays, rated for 4KV
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf What voltage are your present relay contacts rated at?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    7 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just regular "ice cube" no-name chinese relays with generic specs. probably 250V.
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    7 hours ago


















1












$begingroup$

Your suspicion is justified. Voltage increases (and current decreases) as you move toward the open-circuited end of the antenna. The most common solution is to situate the loading coil - and, perhaps, a resonating capacitor - at the base of the antenna. A base-loaded vertical only 5m tall will not be very efficient on 80m, but a center-loaded antenna will probably not be great either, as it's only about 1/4 the length of a resonant monopole.



The voltage along the 5m radiator can be reduced and efficiency can be improved by effectively lengthening the radiator with "top hat" conductors. This will increase the current at the top of your 5m aluminum pipe and, depending on the size of the top hat, reduce the amount of inductive loading you need to add.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But a hatted 5M vertical won't tune in 20M, correct?
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf If it won't, disconnect it with a HV relay as suggested in my answer here.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf Since you have to add compensating reactance, you might decide to make the system resonant on 40m and "tune" it on 20m and 80m. The permutations of lengths and loading are endless!
    $endgroup$
    – Brian K1LI
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @BrianK1LI Added that link you your comment. ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    3 hours ago











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "520"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f14682%2fmultiband-vertical-antenna-not-working-as-expected%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

It may very well be that the open contacts are arcing, and I'm betting that's what is happening.



Here are some possible solutions. How about using different relays that have less tendency to arc:



  1. Open-frame relays with much wider contact spacing

  2. Vacuum relays

  3. Multiple relays in series

Another possibility might be that RF on the control lines may be activating the relays. Suitable RF chokes and bypass capacitors might help that.



It's a myth that all traps are lossy. If they don't get hot to the touch at sustained 100W or higher, then their loss is insignificant. Scroll to the bottom of https://www.w8ji.com/traps.htm:


3.) Do traps create noticeable loss, perhaps one dB per trap typically?



NO! Even the worst traps (coaxial traps) in the worse possible condition of operation are only 1.6dB loss for BOTH traps!







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What about these? tme.com/ar/es/details/li05-1a85/reles-electromagn-de-lengueta/… they are inexpensive reed relays, rated for 4KV
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf What voltage are your present relay contacts rated at?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    7 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just regular "ice cube" no-name chinese relays with generic specs. probably 250V.
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    7 hours ago















3












$begingroup$

It may very well be that the open contacts are arcing, and I'm betting that's what is happening.



Here are some possible solutions. How about using different relays that have less tendency to arc:



  1. Open-frame relays with much wider contact spacing

  2. Vacuum relays

  3. Multiple relays in series

Another possibility might be that RF on the control lines may be activating the relays. Suitable RF chokes and bypass capacitors might help that.



It's a myth that all traps are lossy. If they don't get hot to the touch at sustained 100W or higher, then their loss is insignificant. Scroll to the bottom of https://www.w8ji.com/traps.htm:


3.) Do traps create noticeable loss, perhaps one dB per trap typically?



NO! Even the worst traps (coaxial traps) in the worse possible condition of operation are only 1.6dB loss for BOTH traps!







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What about these? tme.com/ar/es/details/li05-1a85/reles-electromagn-de-lengueta/… they are inexpensive reed relays, rated for 4KV
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf What voltage are your present relay contacts rated at?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    7 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just regular "ice cube" no-name chinese relays with generic specs. probably 250V.
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    7 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$

It may very well be that the open contacts are arcing, and I'm betting that's what is happening.



Here are some possible solutions. How about using different relays that have less tendency to arc:



  1. Open-frame relays with much wider contact spacing

  2. Vacuum relays

  3. Multiple relays in series

Another possibility might be that RF on the control lines may be activating the relays. Suitable RF chokes and bypass capacitors might help that.



It's a myth that all traps are lossy. If they don't get hot to the touch at sustained 100W or higher, then their loss is insignificant. Scroll to the bottom of https://www.w8ji.com/traps.htm:


3.) Do traps create noticeable loss, perhaps one dB per trap typically?



NO! Even the worst traps (coaxial traps) in the worse possible condition of operation are only 1.6dB loss for BOTH traps!







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



It may very well be that the open contacts are arcing, and I'm betting that's what is happening.



Here are some possible solutions. How about using different relays that have less tendency to arc:



  1. Open-frame relays with much wider contact spacing

  2. Vacuum relays

  3. Multiple relays in series

Another possibility might be that RF on the control lines may be activating the relays. Suitable RF chokes and bypass capacitors might help that.



It's a myth that all traps are lossy. If they don't get hot to the touch at sustained 100W or higher, then their loss is insignificant. Scroll to the bottom of https://www.w8ji.com/traps.htm:


3.) Do traps create noticeable loss, perhaps one dB per trap typically?



NO! Even the worst traps (coaxial traps) in the worse possible condition of operation are only 1.6dB loss for BOTH traps!








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 7 hours ago

























answered 7 hours ago









Mike WatersMike Waters

4,1152635




4,1152635











  • $begingroup$
    What about these? tme.com/ar/es/details/li05-1a85/reles-electromagn-de-lengueta/… they are inexpensive reed relays, rated for 4KV
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf What voltage are your present relay contacts rated at?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    7 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just regular "ice cube" no-name chinese relays with generic specs. probably 250V.
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    7 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    What about these? tme.com/ar/es/details/li05-1a85/reles-electromagn-de-lengueta/… they are inexpensive reed relays, rated for 4KV
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf What voltage are your present relay contacts rated at?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    7 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just regular "ice cube" no-name chinese relays with generic specs. probably 250V.
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    7 hours ago















$begingroup$
What about these? tme.com/ar/es/details/li05-1a85/reles-electromagn-de-lengueta/… they are inexpensive reed relays, rated for 4KV
$endgroup$
– hjf
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
What about these? tme.com/ar/es/details/li05-1a85/reles-electromagn-de-lengueta/… they are inexpensive reed relays, rated for 4KV
$endgroup$
– hjf
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
@hjf What voltage are your present relay contacts rated at?
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
7 hours ago





$begingroup$
@hjf What voltage are your present relay contacts rated at?
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
7 hours ago





1




1




$begingroup$
Just regular "ice cube" no-name chinese relays with generic specs. probably 250V.
$endgroup$
– hjf
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Just regular "ice cube" no-name chinese relays with generic specs. probably 250V.
$endgroup$
– hjf
7 hours ago











1












$begingroup$

Your suspicion is justified. Voltage increases (and current decreases) as you move toward the open-circuited end of the antenna. The most common solution is to situate the loading coil - and, perhaps, a resonating capacitor - at the base of the antenna. A base-loaded vertical only 5m tall will not be very efficient on 80m, but a center-loaded antenna will probably not be great either, as it's only about 1/4 the length of a resonant monopole.



The voltage along the 5m radiator can be reduced and efficiency can be improved by effectively lengthening the radiator with "top hat" conductors. This will increase the current at the top of your 5m aluminum pipe and, depending on the size of the top hat, reduce the amount of inductive loading you need to add.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But a hatted 5M vertical won't tune in 20M, correct?
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf If it won't, disconnect it with a HV relay as suggested in my answer here.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf Since you have to add compensating reactance, you might decide to make the system resonant on 40m and "tune" it on 20m and 80m. The permutations of lengths and loading are endless!
    $endgroup$
    – Brian K1LI
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @BrianK1LI Added that link you your comment. ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    3 hours ago















1












$begingroup$

Your suspicion is justified. Voltage increases (and current decreases) as you move toward the open-circuited end of the antenna. The most common solution is to situate the loading coil - and, perhaps, a resonating capacitor - at the base of the antenna. A base-loaded vertical only 5m tall will not be very efficient on 80m, but a center-loaded antenna will probably not be great either, as it's only about 1/4 the length of a resonant monopole.



The voltage along the 5m radiator can be reduced and efficiency can be improved by effectively lengthening the radiator with "top hat" conductors. This will increase the current at the top of your 5m aluminum pipe and, depending on the size of the top hat, reduce the amount of inductive loading you need to add.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But a hatted 5M vertical won't tune in 20M, correct?
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf If it won't, disconnect it with a HV relay as suggested in my answer here.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf Since you have to add compensating reactance, you might decide to make the system resonant on 40m and "tune" it on 20m and 80m. The permutations of lengths and loading are endless!
    $endgroup$
    – Brian K1LI
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @BrianK1LI Added that link you your comment. ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    3 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$

Your suspicion is justified. Voltage increases (and current decreases) as you move toward the open-circuited end of the antenna. The most common solution is to situate the loading coil - and, perhaps, a resonating capacitor - at the base of the antenna. A base-loaded vertical only 5m tall will not be very efficient on 80m, but a center-loaded antenna will probably not be great either, as it's only about 1/4 the length of a resonant monopole.



The voltage along the 5m radiator can be reduced and efficiency can be improved by effectively lengthening the radiator with "top hat" conductors. This will increase the current at the top of your 5m aluminum pipe and, depending on the size of the top hat, reduce the amount of inductive loading you need to add.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Your suspicion is justified. Voltage increases (and current decreases) as you move toward the open-circuited end of the antenna. The most common solution is to situate the loading coil - and, perhaps, a resonating capacitor - at the base of the antenna. A base-loaded vertical only 5m tall will not be very efficient on 80m, but a center-loaded antenna will probably not be great either, as it's only about 1/4 the length of a resonant monopole.



The voltage along the 5m radiator can be reduced and efficiency can be improved by effectively lengthening the radiator with "top hat" conductors. This will increase the current at the top of your 5m aluminum pipe and, depending on the size of the top hat, reduce the amount of inductive loading you need to add.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 8 hours ago









Brian K1LIBrian K1LI

3,130417




3,130417







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But a hatted 5M vertical won't tune in 20M, correct?
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf If it won't, disconnect it with a HV relay as suggested in my answer here.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf Since you have to add compensating reactance, you might decide to make the system resonant on 40m and "tune" it on 20m and 80m. The permutations of lengths and loading are endless!
    $endgroup$
    – Brian K1LI
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @BrianK1LI Added that link you your comment. ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    3 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But a hatted 5M vertical won't tune in 20M, correct?
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf If it won't, disconnect it with a HV relay as suggested in my answer here.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf Since you have to add compensating reactance, you might decide to make the system resonant on 40m and "tune" it on 20m and 80m. The permutations of lengths and loading are endless!
    $endgroup$
    – Brian K1LI
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @BrianK1LI Added that link you your comment. ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    3 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
But a hatted 5M vertical won't tune in 20M, correct?
$endgroup$
– hjf
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
But a hatted 5M vertical won't tune in 20M, correct?
$endgroup$
– hjf
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
@hjf If it won't, disconnect it with a HV relay as suggested in my answer here.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
@hjf If it won't, disconnect it with a HV relay as suggested in my answer here.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
@hjf Since you have to add compensating reactance, you might decide to make the system resonant on 40m and "tune" it on 20m and 80m. The permutations of lengths and loading are endless!
$endgroup$
– Brian K1LI
6 hours ago





$begingroup$
@hjf Since you have to add compensating reactance, you might decide to make the system resonant on 40m and "tune" it on 20m and 80m. The permutations of lengths and loading are endless!
$endgroup$
– Brian K1LI
6 hours ago













$begingroup$
@BrianK1LI Added that link you your comment. ;-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@BrianK1LI Added that link you your comment. ;-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
3 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Amateur Radio Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f14682%2fmultiband-vertical-antenna-not-working-as-expected%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її