Passively reducing ground loss?Practical 80m vertical wire antennas without radials?Does iron ore in the ground affect my signal?Using Earth as an RF groundWhich is better in my situation: Balanced dipole, or as much wire as possible in the air?DAB antenna in roof spaceWhen and why does the size of a ground plane or radials matter?How to probe a dipole antenna?Not-too-distant saltwater groundCounterpoise/ground/radial options for an Inverted LNoise reduction

Why do they consider the Ori false gods?

Why do Ryanair allow me to book connecting itineraries through a third party, but not through their own website?

How do Human Traits Work?

Defining the standard model of PA so that a space alien could understand

Line of lights moving in a straight line , with a few following

Why does the 6502 have the BIT instruction?

What kind of metaphor is "trees in the wind"?

What was the idiom for something that we take without a doubt?

Count Even Digits In Number

At what point in European history could a government build a printing press given a basic description?

Why do most published works in medical imaging try to reduce false positives?

I think I may have violated academic integrity last year - what should I do?

When and what was the first 3D acceleration device ever released?

Should one buy new hardware after a system compromise?

Compactness of finite sets

How to illustrate the Mean Value theorem?

Is the Starlink array really visible from Earth?

I unknowingly submitted plagarised work

Popcorn is the only acceptable snack to consume while watching a movie

Why do airplanes use an axial flow jet engine instead of a more compact centrifugal jet engine?

Have 1.5% of all nuclear reactors ever built melted down?

Image processing: Removal of two spots in fundus images

Where is the logic in castrating fighters?

Writing with dry erase marker on Shabbos, is it permitted?



Passively reducing ground loss?


Practical 80m vertical wire antennas without radials?Does iron ore in the ground affect my signal?Using Earth as an RF groundWhich is better in my situation: Balanced dipole, or as much wire as possible in the air?DAB antenna in roof spaceWhen and why does the size of a ground plane or radials matter?How to probe a dipole antenna?Not-too-distant saltwater groundCounterpoise/ground/radial options for an Inverted LNoise reduction













3












$begingroup$


Would a disconnected wire or conductive mat below a low height antenna reduce ground losses?



A tuned length of wire under a wire antenna might be suitable for NVIS gain. But would a bunch of space blankets or unconnected random length wires or mesh (gopher wire) on or slightly above the ground help reduce ground loss of a low dipole or a vertical with far too few counterpose radials? (e.g. maybe one).










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Random long wires - probably will help. Space blankets and other things $< 1over4lambda$, not connected together, will make no difference, the fields will go right through them.
    $endgroup$
    – tomnexus
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    What's a space blanket? I'm assuming that it's a thin layer of aluminum vacuum-deposited on a Mylar sheet.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Would connecting enough space blankets (aluminized mylar) to get close to 1/4 lambda by overlap (capacitive coupling) and/or wire staples help?
    $endgroup$
    – hotpaw2
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It seems to me that galvanized chicken wire (poultry netting) or other plated fencing material would be cheaper --not to mention more effective-- than space blankets. Besides, the aluminum might be hard to connect to the earth. Both of those materials have been used in addition to ground radials. I suggest that you search the Topand Reflector archives, as this has been asked and answered there many times. And ditto to what Kevin just said. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    4 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @tomnexus Please don't write answers — short, partial, or otherwise, in comments. Even a short answer sometimes turns out to be just right, and a comment can't be accepted — or ranked by its votes. Comments on questions are best used for asking for clarification of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin Reid AG6YO
    4 hours ago















3












$begingroup$


Would a disconnected wire or conductive mat below a low height antenna reduce ground losses?



A tuned length of wire under a wire antenna might be suitable for NVIS gain. But would a bunch of space blankets or unconnected random length wires or mesh (gopher wire) on or slightly above the ground help reduce ground loss of a low dipole or a vertical with far too few counterpose radials? (e.g. maybe one).










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Random long wires - probably will help. Space blankets and other things $< 1over4lambda$, not connected together, will make no difference, the fields will go right through them.
    $endgroup$
    – tomnexus
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    What's a space blanket? I'm assuming that it's a thin layer of aluminum vacuum-deposited on a Mylar sheet.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Would connecting enough space blankets (aluminized mylar) to get close to 1/4 lambda by overlap (capacitive coupling) and/or wire staples help?
    $endgroup$
    – hotpaw2
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It seems to me that galvanized chicken wire (poultry netting) or other plated fencing material would be cheaper --not to mention more effective-- than space blankets. Besides, the aluminum might be hard to connect to the earth. Both of those materials have been used in addition to ground radials. I suggest that you search the Topand Reflector archives, as this has been asked and answered there many times. And ditto to what Kevin just said. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    4 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @tomnexus Please don't write answers — short, partial, or otherwise, in comments. Even a short answer sometimes turns out to be just right, and a comment can't be accepted — or ranked by its votes. Comments on questions are best used for asking for clarification of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin Reid AG6YO
    4 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$


Would a disconnected wire or conductive mat below a low height antenna reduce ground losses?



A tuned length of wire under a wire antenna might be suitable for NVIS gain. But would a bunch of space blankets or unconnected random length wires or mesh (gopher wire) on or slightly above the ground help reduce ground loss of a low dipole or a vertical with far too few counterpose radials? (e.g. maybe one).










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Would a disconnected wire or conductive mat below a low height antenna reduce ground losses?



A tuned length of wire under a wire antenna might be suitable for NVIS gain. But would a bunch of space blankets or unconnected random length wires or mesh (gopher wire) on or slightly above the ground help reduce ground loss of a low dipole or a vertical with far too few counterpose radials? (e.g. maybe one).







antenna-theory wire-antenna antenna-system earth






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago







hotpaw2

















asked 8 hours ago









hotpaw2hotpaw2

3,27321935




3,27321935











  • $begingroup$
    Random long wires - probably will help. Space blankets and other things $< 1over4lambda$, not connected together, will make no difference, the fields will go right through them.
    $endgroup$
    – tomnexus
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    What's a space blanket? I'm assuming that it's a thin layer of aluminum vacuum-deposited on a Mylar sheet.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Would connecting enough space blankets (aluminized mylar) to get close to 1/4 lambda by overlap (capacitive coupling) and/or wire staples help?
    $endgroup$
    – hotpaw2
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It seems to me that galvanized chicken wire (poultry netting) or other plated fencing material would be cheaper --not to mention more effective-- than space blankets. Besides, the aluminum might be hard to connect to the earth. Both of those materials have been used in addition to ground radials. I suggest that you search the Topand Reflector archives, as this has been asked and answered there many times. And ditto to what Kevin just said. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    4 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @tomnexus Please don't write answers — short, partial, or otherwise, in comments. Even a short answer sometimes turns out to be just right, and a comment can't be accepted — or ranked by its votes. Comments on questions are best used for asking for clarification of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin Reid AG6YO
    4 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Random long wires - probably will help. Space blankets and other things $< 1over4lambda$, not connected together, will make no difference, the fields will go right through them.
    $endgroup$
    – tomnexus
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    What's a space blanket? I'm assuming that it's a thin layer of aluminum vacuum-deposited on a Mylar sheet.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Would connecting enough space blankets (aluminized mylar) to get close to 1/4 lambda by overlap (capacitive coupling) and/or wire staples help?
    $endgroup$
    – hotpaw2
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It seems to me that galvanized chicken wire (poultry netting) or other plated fencing material would be cheaper --not to mention more effective-- than space blankets. Besides, the aluminum might be hard to connect to the earth. Both of those materials have been used in addition to ground radials. I suggest that you search the Topand Reflector archives, as this has been asked and answered there many times. And ditto to what Kevin just said. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    4 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @tomnexus Please don't write answers — short, partial, or otherwise, in comments. Even a short answer sometimes turns out to be just right, and a comment can't be accepted — or ranked by its votes. Comments on questions are best used for asking for clarification of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin Reid AG6YO
    4 hours ago















$begingroup$
Random long wires - probably will help. Space blankets and other things $< 1over4lambda$, not connected together, will make no difference, the fields will go right through them.
$endgroup$
– tomnexus
6 hours ago





$begingroup$
Random long wires - probably will help. Space blankets and other things $< 1over4lambda$, not connected together, will make no difference, the fields will go right through them.
$endgroup$
– tomnexus
6 hours ago













$begingroup$
What's a space blanket? I'm assuming that it's a thin layer of aluminum vacuum-deposited on a Mylar sheet.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
What's a space blanket? I'm assuming that it's a thin layer of aluminum vacuum-deposited on a Mylar sheet.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
Would connecting enough space blankets (aluminized mylar) to get close to 1/4 lambda by overlap (capacitive coupling) and/or wire staples help?
$endgroup$
– hotpaw2
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Would connecting enough space blankets (aluminized mylar) to get close to 1/4 lambda by overlap (capacitive coupling) and/or wire staples help?
$endgroup$
– hotpaw2
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
It seems to me that galvanized chicken wire (poultry netting) or other plated fencing material would be cheaper --not to mention more effective-- than space blankets. Besides, the aluminum might be hard to connect to the earth. Both of those materials have been used in addition to ground radials. I suggest that you search the Topand Reflector archives, as this has been asked and answered there many times. And ditto to what Kevin just said. :-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
4 hours ago





$begingroup$
It seems to me that galvanized chicken wire (poultry netting) or other plated fencing material would be cheaper --not to mention more effective-- than space blankets. Besides, the aluminum might be hard to connect to the earth. Both of those materials have been used in addition to ground radials. I suggest that you search the Topand Reflector archives, as this has been asked and answered there many times. And ditto to what Kevin just said. :-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
4 hours ago





1




1




$begingroup$
@tomnexus Please don't write answers — short, partial, or otherwise, in comments. Even a short answer sometimes turns out to be just right, and a comment can't be accepted — or ranked by its votes. Comments on questions are best used for asking for clarification of the question.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Reid AG6YO
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@tomnexus Please don't write answers — short, partial, or otherwise, in comments. Even a short answer sometimes turns out to be just right, and a comment can't be accepted — or ranked by its votes. Comments on questions are best used for asking for clarification of the question.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Reid AG6YO
4 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

It is well-established that a wire reflector --on or just above the ground-- directly under a dipole can do just that.



I don't have a reference, but at a field day that I was present at years ago, a ham on 75m did that. Afterwards, as W8JI (who also was present) said, "He was just 'killing people'", meaning that his QSO count immediately went way up. His reflector was directly under his center-fed dipole. IIRC, it was laying directly on the ground. Although the spacing between the wire and the dipole was not optimum, it certainly seemed to work.



It was good and conductive soil, in NW Ohio near the Maumee River where Route 235 ends at a SW-NE road parallel with it. 200 years ago, that was part of the Great Black Swamp. Later, ditches were dug and tiles laid to drain it into the river, which turned all of Lucas and Wood county into fertile farmland. Still, adding that wire helped his signal.



Perhaps the band conditions improved at the same time, and the wire had little or nothing to do with it. But I've heard of too many similar experiences to discount that.




As for a vertical as you describe, I'm leaving that for someone else to answer.




share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    );
    , "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "520"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f14585%2fpassively-reducing-ground-loss%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    It is well-established that a wire reflector --on or just above the ground-- directly under a dipole can do just that.



    I don't have a reference, but at a field day that I was present at years ago, a ham on 75m did that. Afterwards, as W8JI (who also was present) said, "He was just 'killing people'", meaning that his QSO count immediately went way up. His reflector was directly under his center-fed dipole. IIRC, it was laying directly on the ground. Although the spacing between the wire and the dipole was not optimum, it certainly seemed to work.



    It was good and conductive soil, in NW Ohio near the Maumee River where Route 235 ends at a SW-NE road parallel with it. 200 years ago, that was part of the Great Black Swamp. Later, ditches were dug and tiles laid to drain it into the river, which turned all of Lucas and Wood county into fertile farmland. Still, adding that wire helped his signal.



    Perhaps the band conditions improved at the same time, and the wire had little or nothing to do with it. But I've heard of too many similar experiences to discount that.




    As for a vertical as you describe, I'm leaving that for someone else to answer.




    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      It is well-established that a wire reflector --on or just above the ground-- directly under a dipole can do just that.



      I don't have a reference, but at a field day that I was present at years ago, a ham on 75m did that. Afterwards, as W8JI (who also was present) said, "He was just 'killing people'", meaning that his QSO count immediately went way up. His reflector was directly under his center-fed dipole. IIRC, it was laying directly on the ground. Although the spacing between the wire and the dipole was not optimum, it certainly seemed to work.



      It was good and conductive soil, in NW Ohio near the Maumee River where Route 235 ends at a SW-NE road parallel with it. 200 years ago, that was part of the Great Black Swamp. Later, ditches were dug and tiles laid to drain it into the river, which turned all of Lucas and Wood county into fertile farmland. Still, adding that wire helped his signal.



      Perhaps the band conditions improved at the same time, and the wire had little or nothing to do with it. But I've heard of too many similar experiences to discount that.




      As for a vertical as you describe, I'm leaving that for someone else to answer.




      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        It is well-established that a wire reflector --on or just above the ground-- directly under a dipole can do just that.



        I don't have a reference, but at a field day that I was present at years ago, a ham on 75m did that. Afterwards, as W8JI (who also was present) said, "He was just 'killing people'", meaning that his QSO count immediately went way up. His reflector was directly under his center-fed dipole. IIRC, it was laying directly on the ground. Although the spacing between the wire and the dipole was not optimum, it certainly seemed to work.



        It was good and conductive soil, in NW Ohio near the Maumee River where Route 235 ends at a SW-NE road parallel with it. 200 years ago, that was part of the Great Black Swamp. Later, ditches were dug and tiles laid to drain it into the river, which turned all of Lucas and Wood county into fertile farmland. Still, adding that wire helped his signal.



        Perhaps the band conditions improved at the same time, and the wire had little or nothing to do with it. But I've heard of too many similar experiences to discount that.




        As for a vertical as you describe, I'm leaving that for someone else to answer.




        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        It is well-established that a wire reflector --on or just above the ground-- directly under a dipole can do just that.



        I don't have a reference, but at a field day that I was present at years ago, a ham on 75m did that. Afterwards, as W8JI (who also was present) said, "He was just 'killing people'", meaning that his QSO count immediately went way up. His reflector was directly under his center-fed dipole. IIRC, it was laying directly on the ground. Although the spacing between the wire and the dipole was not optimum, it certainly seemed to work.



        It was good and conductive soil, in NW Ohio near the Maumee River where Route 235 ends at a SW-NE road parallel with it. 200 years ago, that was part of the Great Black Swamp. Later, ditches were dug and tiles laid to drain it into the river, which turned all of Lucas and Wood county into fertile farmland. Still, adding that wire helped his signal.



        Perhaps the band conditions improved at the same time, and the wire had little or nothing to do with it. But I've heard of too many similar experiences to discount that.




        As for a vertical as you describe, I'm leaving that for someone else to answer.





        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 6 hours ago

























        answered 7 hours ago









        Mike WatersMike Waters

        4,0572635




        4,0572635



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Amateur Radio Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f14585%2fpassively-reducing-ground-loss%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її