How could it be that 80% of townspeople were farmers during the Edo period in Japan?What were the main clans of the sengoku period?Were there any naval engagements during the Mongol invasions of Japan?During the Second World War, did the Germans expect that Japan would declare war on Russia?how could japan recover very fast their economy eventhough the two bombs were dropped?How many samurai warriors were there during the Sengoku period?How were the prime ministers of Japan selected during the Taisho era?Could German citizens visit Japan during the Nazi era? And if so what would the locals think of them?How useful were Chinese contributions to the defeat of Japan in WWII?How common were duels in the Tokugawa Japan?What caused the long lasting of peace in during the Heian Period?

Do people who work at research institutes consider themselves "academics"?

I recently started my machine learning PhD and I have absolutely no idea what I'm doing

Why can't I share a one use code with anyone else?

What is this weird d12 for?

How do I know which cipher suites can be disabled?

Can my American children re-enter the USA by International flight with a passport card? Being that their passport book has expired

Why did Varys remove his rings?

Was the dragon prowess intentionally downplayed in S08E04?

How to not get blinded by an attack at dawn

To whom did Varys write those letters in Game of Thrones S8E5?

Holding rent money for my friend which amounts to over $10k?

My bread in my bread maker rises and then falls down just after cooking starts

UUID type for NEWID()

Why did the metro bus stop at each railway crossing, despite no warning indicating a train was coming?

Could a space colony 1g from the sun work?

How does Ctrl+c and Ctrl+v work?

Why were the bells ignored in S8E5?

Could there be something like aerobatic smoke trails in the vacuum of space?

What was Varys trying to do at the beginning of S08E05?

Is the seat-belt sign activation when a pilot goes to the lavatory standard procedure?

Wireless headphones interfere with Wi-Fi signal on laptop

Why does SSL Labs now consider CBC suites weak?

labelled end points on logic diagram

Developers demotivated due to working on same project for more than 2 years



How could it be that 80% of townspeople were farmers during the Edo period in Japan?


What were the main clans of the sengoku period?Were there any naval engagements during the Mongol invasions of Japan?During the Second World War, did the Germans expect that Japan would declare war on Russia?how could japan recover very fast their economy eventhough the two bombs were dropped?How many samurai warriors were there during the Sengoku period?How were the prime ministers of Japan selected during the Taisho era?Could German citizens visit Japan during the Nazi era? And if so what would the locals think of them?How useful were Chinese contributions to the defeat of Japan in WWII?How common were duels in the Tokugawa Japan?What caused the long lasting of peace in during the Heian Period?













2















I've read in the book "A modern history of Japan" by Andrew Gordon and other articles, that most of the Japanese townspeople were farmers(about 80% I suppose) during the Edo period. But according to the Wikipedia article Agriculture, forestry, and fishing in Japan and some satellite maps, only about one-fifth of Japan's land is suitable for cultivation.



I'm a bit confused, how is this possible? 80% of townspeople worked on only 20% of the whole land?










share|improve this question









New contributor



P.Alipoor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1





    Welcome to HistorySE, P.Alipoor! It looks as if you'd assume for 80% of farmers to work on 80% of the whole available landmass? When the first farmers appeared in Japan, 100% of people worked on 0.00001% of the land? Is this a simple misunderstanding and less a history problem but math, geography and logic? As farmers aren't evenly distributed across the land anywhere, why should they in Edo Japan?

    – LangLangC
    5 hours ago











  • Japanese farmers produced ... rice on terraced fields, among other crops.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    First, explain why townspeople were farmers.

    – jamesqf
    5 hours ago






  • 13





    About 7/10ths of the Earth is covered by water. Is it likewise a mystery how 100% of human farmers manage to subsist off of only 30% of the earth's surface to work with?

    – T.E.D.
    4 hours ago











  • @T.E.D.: no, they only occupy (and work) a fraction of that.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    4 hours ago
















2















I've read in the book "A modern history of Japan" by Andrew Gordon and other articles, that most of the Japanese townspeople were farmers(about 80% I suppose) during the Edo period. But according to the Wikipedia article Agriculture, forestry, and fishing in Japan and some satellite maps, only about one-fifth of Japan's land is suitable for cultivation.



I'm a bit confused, how is this possible? 80% of townspeople worked on only 20% of the whole land?










share|improve this question









New contributor



P.Alipoor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1





    Welcome to HistorySE, P.Alipoor! It looks as if you'd assume for 80% of farmers to work on 80% of the whole available landmass? When the first farmers appeared in Japan, 100% of people worked on 0.00001% of the land? Is this a simple misunderstanding and less a history problem but math, geography and logic? As farmers aren't evenly distributed across the land anywhere, why should they in Edo Japan?

    – LangLangC
    5 hours ago











  • Japanese farmers produced ... rice on terraced fields, among other crops.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    First, explain why townspeople were farmers.

    – jamesqf
    5 hours ago






  • 13





    About 7/10ths of the Earth is covered by water. Is it likewise a mystery how 100% of human farmers manage to subsist off of only 30% of the earth's surface to work with?

    – T.E.D.
    4 hours ago











  • @T.E.D.: no, they only occupy (and work) a fraction of that.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    4 hours ago














2












2








2








I've read in the book "A modern history of Japan" by Andrew Gordon and other articles, that most of the Japanese townspeople were farmers(about 80% I suppose) during the Edo period. But according to the Wikipedia article Agriculture, forestry, and fishing in Japan and some satellite maps, only about one-fifth of Japan's land is suitable for cultivation.



I'm a bit confused, how is this possible? 80% of townspeople worked on only 20% of the whole land?










share|improve this question









New contributor



P.Alipoor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I've read in the book "A modern history of Japan" by Andrew Gordon and other articles, that most of the Japanese townspeople were farmers(about 80% I suppose) during the Edo period. But according to the Wikipedia article Agriculture, forestry, and fishing in Japan and some satellite maps, only about one-fifth of Japan's land is suitable for cultivation.



I'm a bit confused, how is this possible? 80% of townspeople worked on only 20% of the whole land?







japan tokugawa-era






share|improve this question









New contributor



P.Alipoor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



P.Alipoor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









sempaiscuba

58.3k7206265




58.3k7206265






New contributor



P.Alipoor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 6 hours ago









P.AlipoorP.Alipoor

142




142




New contributor



P.Alipoor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




P.Alipoor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 1





    Welcome to HistorySE, P.Alipoor! It looks as if you'd assume for 80% of farmers to work on 80% of the whole available landmass? When the first farmers appeared in Japan, 100% of people worked on 0.00001% of the land? Is this a simple misunderstanding and less a history problem but math, geography and logic? As farmers aren't evenly distributed across the land anywhere, why should they in Edo Japan?

    – LangLangC
    5 hours ago











  • Japanese farmers produced ... rice on terraced fields, among other crops.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    First, explain why townspeople were farmers.

    – jamesqf
    5 hours ago






  • 13





    About 7/10ths of the Earth is covered by water. Is it likewise a mystery how 100% of human farmers manage to subsist off of only 30% of the earth's surface to work with?

    – T.E.D.
    4 hours ago











  • @T.E.D.: no, they only occupy (and work) a fraction of that.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    4 hours ago













  • 1





    Welcome to HistorySE, P.Alipoor! It looks as if you'd assume for 80% of farmers to work on 80% of the whole available landmass? When the first farmers appeared in Japan, 100% of people worked on 0.00001% of the land? Is this a simple misunderstanding and less a history problem but math, geography and logic? As farmers aren't evenly distributed across the land anywhere, why should they in Edo Japan?

    – LangLangC
    5 hours ago











  • Japanese farmers produced ... rice on terraced fields, among other crops.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    First, explain why townspeople were farmers.

    – jamesqf
    5 hours ago






  • 13





    About 7/10ths of the Earth is covered by water. Is it likewise a mystery how 100% of human farmers manage to subsist off of only 30% of the earth's surface to work with?

    – T.E.D.
    4 hours ago











  • @T.E.D.: no, they only occupy (and work) a fraction of that.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    4 hours ago








1




1





Welcome to HistorySE, P.Alipoor! It looks as if you'd assume for 80% of farmers to work on 80% of the whole available landmass? When the first farmers appeared in Japan, 100% of people worked on 0.00001% of the land? Is this a simple misunderstanding and less a history problem but math, geography and logic? As farmers aren't evenly distributed across the land anywhere, why should they in Edo Japan?

– LangLangC
5 hours ago





Welcome to HistorySE, P.Alipoor! It looks as if you'd assume for 80% of farmers to work on 80% of the whole available landmass? When the first farmers appeared in Japan, 100% of people worked on 0.00001% of the land? Is this a simple misunderstanding and less a history problem but math, geography and logic? As farmers aren't evenly distributed across the land anywhere, why should they in Edo Japan?

– LangLangC
5 hours ago













Japanese farmers produced ... rice on terraced fields, among other crops.

– Denis de Bernardy
5 hours ago





Japanese farmers produced ... rice on terraced fields, among other crops.

– Denis de Bernardy
5 hours ago




1




1





First, explain why townspeople were farmers.

– jamesqf
5 hours ago





First, explain why townspeople were farmers.

– jamesqf
5 hours ago




13




13





About 7/10ths of the Earth is covered by water. Is it likewise a mystery how 100% of human farmers manage to subsist off of only 30% of the earth's surface to work with?

– T.E.D.
4 hours ago





About 7/10ths of the Earth is covered by water. Is it likewise a mystery how 100% of human farmers manage to subsist off of only 30% of the earth's surface to work with?

– T.E.D.
4 hours ago













@T.E.D.: no, they only occupy (and work) a fraction of that.

– Denis de Bernardy
4 hours ago






@T.E.D.: no, they only occupy (and work) a fraction of that.

– Denis de Bernardy
4 hours ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















18














The total land area of Japan is around 146,000 square miles. 20% of that works out around 29,000 square miles or 18.6 million acres.



The population of Tokugawa japan was around 30 million people. 80% of that is 24 million people. This gives each farmer roughly 3/4s of an acre.



The basic unit of land in Japan was the cho, which was roughly 2.5 acres. This produced roughly 10 koku. A "koku" was the amount of rice needed to feed one person for one year. Simple math gives 4 koku an acre, and therefore 3 koku for 3/4s of an acre. In other words, in theory at least, each person has enough land to grow rice for three.



Thus, if 80% of the population is working 20% of the land in Tokugawa Japan, then they are easily growing enough to feed themselves plus the remaining 20% who are not farmers.



Now of course that's the ideal case, and bad weather, war and other mishaps are going to negatively affect that to the point where in actual fact there were periods of starvation and food related unrest. But it means that "80% of townspeople worked on only 20% of the whole land" is perfectly believable.






share|improve this answer


















  • 10





    Just to add to this otherwise great answer, for those who never had the curiosity to research what an acre is and why it is what it is, an acre roughly corresponds to what a peasant was able to plow in a day.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    4 hours ago







  • 3





    Don't forget that people are grouped into families. 24 million people was probably something like 4-5 million families, running a farm together.

    – Barmar
    3 hours ago






  • 3





    Right, people weren't working individual plots, but families were working in common. Presumably the "cho" indicated a common basic farm unit.

    – Steven Burnap
    3 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






P.Alipoor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52613%2fhow-could-it-be-that-80-of-townspeople-were-farmers-during-the-edo-period-in-ja%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









18














The total land area of Japan is around 146,000 square miles. 20% of that works out around 29,000 square miles or 18.6 million acres.



The population of Tokugawa japan was around 30 million people. 80% of that is 24 million people. This gives each farmer roughly 3/4s of an acre.



The basic unit of land in Japan was the cho, which was roughly 2.5 acres. This produced roughly 10 koku. A "koku" was the amount of rice needed to feed one person for one year. Simple math gives 4 koku an acre, and therefore 3 koku for 3/4s of an acre. In other words, in theory at least, each person has enough land to grow rice for three.



Thus, if 80% of the population is working 20% of the land in Tokugawa Japan, then they are easily growing enough to feed themselves plus the remaining 20% who are not farmers.



Now of course that's the ideal case, and bad weather, war and other mishaps are going to negatively affect that to the point where in actual fact there were periods of starvation and food related unrest. But it means that "80% of townspeople worked on only 20% of the whole land" is perfectly believable.






share|improve this answer


















  • 10





    Just to add to this otherwise great answer, for those who never had the curiosity to research what an acre is and why it is what it is, an acre roughly corresponds to what a peasant was able to plow in a day.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    4 hours ago







  • 3





    Don't forget that people are grouped into families. 24 million people was probably something like 4-5 million families, running a farm together.

    – Barmar
    3 hours ago






  • 3





    Right, people weren't working individual plots, but families were working in common. Presumably the "cho" indicated a common basic farm unit.

    – Steven Burnap
    3 hours ago















18














The total land area of Japan is around 146,000 square miles. 20% of that works out around 29,000 square miles or 18.6 million acres.



The population of Tokugawa japan was around 30 million people. 80% of that is 24 million people. This gives each farmer roughly 3/4s of an acre.



The basic unit of land in Japan was the cho, which was roughly 2.5 acres. This produced roughly 10 koku. A "koku" was the amount of rice needed to feed one person for one year. Simple math gives 4 koku an acre, and therefore 3 koku for 3/4s of an acre. In other words, in theory at least, each person has enough land to grow rice for three.



Thus, if 80% of the population is working 20% of the land in Tokugawa Japan, then they are easily growing enough to feed themselves plus the remaining 20% who are not farmers.



Now of course that's the ideal case, and bad weather, war and other mishaps are going to negatively affect that to the point where in actual fact there were periods of starvation and food related unrest. But it means that "80% of townspeople worked on only 20% of the whole land" is perfectly believable.






share|improve this answer


















  • 10





    Just to add to this otherwise great answer, for those who never had the curiosity to research what an acre is and why it is what it is, an acre roughly corresponds to what a peasant was able to plow in a day.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    4 hours ago







  • 3





    Don't forget that people are grouped into families. 24 million people was probably something like 4-5 million families, running a farm together.

    – Barmar
    3 hours ago






  • 3





    Right, people weren't working individual plots, but families were working in common. Presumably the "cho" indicated a common basic farm unit.

    – Steven Burnap
    3 hours ago













18












18








18







The total land area of Japan is around 146,000 square miles. 20% of that works out around 29,000 square miles or 18.6 million acres.



The population of Tokugawa japan was around 30 million people. 80% of that is 24 million people. This gives each farmer roughly 3/4s of an acre.



The basic unit of land in Japan was the cho, which was roughly 2.5 acres. This produced roughly 10 koku. A "koku" was the amount of rice needed to feed one person for one year. Simple math gives 4 koku an acre, and therefore 3 koku for 3/4s of an acre. In other words, in theory at least, each person has enough land to grow rice for three.



Thus, if 80% of the population is working 20% of the land in Tokugawa Japan, then they are easily growing enough to feed themselves plus the remaining 20% who are not farmers.



Now of course that's the ideal case, and bad weather, war and other mishaps are going to negatively affect that to the point where in actual fact there were periods of starvation and food related unrest. But it means that "80% of townspeople worked on only 20% of the whole land" is perfectly believable.






share|improve this answer













The total land area of Japan is around 146,000 square miles. 20% of that works out around 29,000 square miles or 18.6 million acres.



The population of Tokugawa japan was around 30 million people. 80% of that is 24 million people. This gives each farmer roughly 3/4s of an acre.



The basic unit of land in Japan was the cho, which was roughly 2.5 acres. This produced roughly 10 koku. A "koku" was the amount of rice needed to feed one person for one year. Simple math gives 4 koku an acre, and therefore 3 koku for 3/4s of an acre. In other words, in theory at least, each person has enough land to grow rice for three.



Thus, if 80% of the population is working 20% of the land in Tokugawa Japan, then they are easily growing enough to feed themselves plus the remaining 20% who are not farmers.



Now of course that's the ideal case, and bad weather, war and other mishaps are going to negatively affect that to the point where in actual fact there were periods of starvation and food related unrest. But it means that "80% of townspeople worked on only 20% of the whole land" is perfectly believable.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 5 hours ago









Steven BurnapSteven Burnap

4,2301929




4,2301929







  • 10





    Just to add to this otherwise great answer, for those who never had the curiosity to research what an acre is and why it is what it is, an acre roughly corresponds to what a peasant was able to plow in a day.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    4 hours ago







  • 3





    Don't forget that people are grouped into families. 24 million people was probably something like 4-5 million families, running a farm together.

    – Barmar
    3 hours ago






  • 3





    Right, people weren't working individual plots, but families were working in common. Presumably the "cho" indicated a common basic farm unit.

    – Steven Burnap
    3 hours ago












  • 10





    Just to add to this otherwise great answer, for those who never had the curiosity to research what an acre is and why it is what it is, an acre roughly corresponds to what a peasant was able to plow in a day.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    4 hours ago







  • 3





    Don't forget that people are grouped into families. 24 million people was probably something like 4-5 million families, running a farm together.

    – Barmar
    3 hours ago






  • 3





    Right, people weren't working individual plots, but families were working in common. Presumably the "cho" indicated a common basic farm unit.

    – Steven Burnap
    3 hours ago







10




10





Just to add to this otherwise great answer, for those who never had the curiosity to research what an acre is and why it is what it is, an acre roughly corresponds to what a peasant was able to plow in a day.

– Denis de Bernardy
4 hours ago






Just to add to this otherwise great answer, for those who never had the curiosity to research what an acre is and why it is what it is, an acre roughly corresponds to what a peasant was able to plow in a day.

– Denis de Bernardy
4 hours ago





3




3





Don't forget that people are grouped into families. 24 million people was probably something like 4-5 million families, running a farm together.

– Barmar
3 hours ago





Don't forget that people are grouped into families. 24 million people was probably something like 4-5 million families, running a farm together.

– Barmar
3 hours ago




3




3





Right, people weren't working individual plots, but families were working in common. Presumably the "cho" indicated a common basic farm unit.

– Steven Burnap
3 hours ago





Right, people weren't working individual plots, but families were working in common. Presumably the "cho" indicated a common basic farm unit.

– Steven Burnap
3 hours ago










P.Alipoor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















P.Alipoor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












P.Alipoor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











P.Alipoor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52613%2fhow-could-it-be-that-80-of-townspeople-were-farmers-during-the-edo-period-in-ja%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480