How can I get rid of an unhelpful parallel branch when unpivoting a single row?NUMA Nodes - MAXDOP - PLESQL Server thread statuswhy sql server has high Worker threads?SQL Server Threads and Degree Of ParallelismIs it possible to see which SPID uses which scheduler (worker thread)?Who is using my worker threads? SQL Server 2014 - HADRMeasure Agent Job failure and running jobs with 'execution_status'SQL Server instance running out of worker threadsWhat's the easiest and most accurate way to visualize parallel thread usage in SQL Server?MAX worker thread in SQL server 2012/14/16

"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context

Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?

Creating a chemical industry from a medieval tech level without petroleum

A strange hotel

What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?

How can I get rid of an unhelpful parallel branch when unpivoting a single row?

Do I need to watch Ant-Man and the Wasp and Captain Marvel before watching Avengers: Endgame?

What does a straight horizontal line above a few notes, after a changed tempo mean?

"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?

A faster way to compute the largest prime factor

What does MLD stand for?

Restricting the options of a lookup field, based on the value of another lookup field?

Magical attacks and overcoming damage resistance

Older movie/show about humans on derelict alien warship which refuels by passing through a star

Cayley's Matrix Notation

Which big number is bigger?

Find a stone which is not the lightest one

Island of Knights, Knaves and Spies

I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?

Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?

Is it acceptable to use working hours to read general interest books?

Is there a word for the censored part of a video?

Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?

How do I produce this Greek letter koppa: Ϟ in pdfLaTeX?



How can I get rid of an unhelpful parallel branch when unpivoting a single row?


NUMA Nodes - MAXDOP - PLESQL Server thread statuswhy sql server has high Worker threads?SQL Server Threads and Degree Of ParallelismIs it possible to see which SPID uses which scheduler (worker thread)?Who is using my worker threads? SQL Server 2014 - HADRMeasure Agent Job failure and running jobs with 'execution_status'SQL Server instance running out of worker threadsWhat's the easiest and most accurate way to visualize parallel thread usage in SQL Server?MAX worker thread in SQL server 2012/14/16






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















Consider the following query that unpivots a few handfuls of scalar aggregates:



SELECT A, B
FROM (
SELECT
MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
, MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
, MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
, MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
, MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
, MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
, MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
, MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
) q
UNPIVOT(B FOR A IN (
VAL1
,VAL2
,VAL3
,VAL4
,VAL5
,VAL6
,VAL7
,VAL16
)) U
OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


On SQL Server 2017, I get a plan with two parallel branches. The left parallel branch feels out of place to me. The optimizer has a guarantee that there will be only a single row output from the global scalar aggregate, yet the parent operator of it is a Distribute Streams with round robin partitioning:



round robin



When I execute the query all of the rows go to a single thread as expected. There's no performance problem with this query, but the query reserves 8 parallel threads with MAXDOP set to 4. Again, I feel that this is out of place. It's impossible for both parallel branches to execute at the same time. I want to avoid unnecessary worker thread reservation because I have TF 2467 enabled which changes the scheduling algorithm to look at the number of worker threads per scheduler.



Is it possible to rewrite the query to have exactly one parallel branch that contains the table scan and local aggregate? For example, I would be fine with the general shape below except that I want the nested loop to execute in a serial zone:



enter image description here



For Application Reasons™ I strongly prefer to avoid splitting this query up into parts. If desired, you can view the actual query plan here. If you'd like to play along at home, here is T-SQL to create the table used in the query:



DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO;

CREATE TABLE dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO (
ID BIGINT,
FILLER VARCHAR(100)
);

INSERT INTO dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO WITH (TABLOCK)
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) % 15
, REPLICATE('Z', 100)
FROM master..spt_values t1
CROSS JOIN master..spt_values t2;









share|improve this question




























    3















    Consider the following query that unpivots a few handfuls of scalar aggregates:



    SELECT A, B
    FROM (
    SELECT
    MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
    , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
    , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
    , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
    , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
    , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
    , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
    , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
    FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
    ) q
    UNPIVOT(B FOR A IN (
    VAL1
    ,VAL2
    ,VAL3
    ,VAL4
    ,VAL5
    ,VAL6
    ,VAL7
    ,VAL16
    )) U
    OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


    On SQL Server 2017, I get a plan with two parallel branches. The left parallel branch feels out of place to me. The optimizer has a guarantee that there will be only a single row output from the global scalar aggregate, yet the parent operator of it is a Distribute Streams with round robin partitioning:



    round robin



    When I execute the query all of the rows go to a single thread as expected. There's no performance problem with this query, but the query reserves 8 parallel threads with MAXDOP set to 4. Again, I feel that this is out of place. It's impossible for both parallel branches to execute at the same time. I want to avoid unnecessary worker thread reservation because I have TF 2467 enabled which changes the scheduling algorithm to look at the number of worker threads per scheduler.



    Is it possible to rewrite the query to have exactly one parallel branch that contains the table scan and local aggregate? For example, I would be fine with the general shape below except that I want the nested loop to execute in a serial zone:



    enter image description here



    For Application Reasons™ I strongly prefer to avoid splitting this query up into parts. If desired, you can view the actual query plan here. If you'd like to play along at home, here is T-SQL to create the table used in the query:



    DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO;

    CREATE TABLE dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO (
    ID BIGINT,
    FILLER VARCHAR(100)
    );

    INSERT INTO dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO WITH (TABLOCK)
    SELECT
    ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) % 15
    , REPLICATE('Z', 100)
    FROM master..spt_values t1
    CROSS JOIN master..spt_values t2;









    share|improve this question
























      3












      3








      3








      Consider the following query that unpivots a few handfuls of scalar aggregates:



      SELECT A, B
      FROM (
      SELECT
      MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
      FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
      ) q
      UNPIVOT(B FOR A IN (
      VAL1
      ,VAL2
      ,VAL3
      ,VAL4
      ,VAL5
      ,VAL6
      ,VAL7
      ,VAL16
      )) U
      OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


      On SQL Server 2017, I get a plan with two parallel branches. The left parallel branch feels out of place to me. The optimizer has a guarantee that there will be only a single row output from the global scalar aggregate, yet the parent operator of it is a Distribute Streams with round robin partitioning:



      round robin



      When I execute the query all of the rows go to a single thread as expected. There's no performance problem with this query, but the query reserves 8 parallel threads with MAXDOP set to 4. Again, I feel that this is out of place. It's impossible for both parallel branches to execute at the same time. I want to avoid unnecessary worker thread reservation because I have TF 2467 enabled which changes the scheduling algorithm to look at the number of worker threads per scheduler.



      Is it possible to rewrite the query to have exactly one parallel branch that contains the table scan and local aggregate? For example, I would be fine with the general shape below except that I want the nested loop to execute in a serial zone:



      enter image description here



      For Application Reasons™ I strongly prefer to avoid splitting this query up into parts. If desired, you can view the actual query plan here. If you'd like to play along at home, here is T-SQL to create the table used in the query:



      DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO;

      CREATE TABLE dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO (
      ID BIGINT,
      FILLER VARCHAR(100)
      );

      INSERT INTO dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO WITH (TABLOCK)
      SELECT
      ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) % 15
      , REPLICATE('Z', 100)
      FROM master..spt_values t1
      CROSS JOIN master..spt_values t2;









      share|improve this question














      Consider the following query that unpivots a few handfuls of scalar aggregates:



      SELECT A, B
      FROM (
      SELECT
      MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
      FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
      ) q
      UNPIVOT(B FOR A IN (
      VAL1
      ,VAL2
      ,VAL3
      ,VAL4
      ,VAL5
      ,VAL6
      ,VAL7
      ,VAL16
      )) U
      OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


      On SQL Server 2017, I get a plan with two parallel branches. The left parallel branch feels out of place to me. The optimizer has a guarantee that there will be only a single row output from the global scalar aggregate, yet the parent operator of it is a Distribute Streams with round robin partitioning:



      round robin



      When I execute the query all of the rows go to a single thread as expected. There's no performance problem with this query, but the query reserves 8 parallel threads with MAXDOP set to 4. Again, I feel that this is out of place. It's impossible for both parallel branches to execute at the same time. I want to avoid unnecessary worker thread reservation because I have TF 2467 enabled which changes the scheduling algorithm to look at the number of worker threads per scheduler.



      Is it possible to rewrite the query to have exactly one parallel branch that contains the table scan and local aggregate? For example, I would be fine with the general shape below except that I want the nested loop to execute in a serial zone:



      enter image description here



      For Application Reasons™ I strongly prefer to avoid splitting this query up into parts. If desired, you can view the actual query plan here. If you'd like to play along at home, here is T-SQL to create the table used in the query:



      DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO;

      CREATE TABLE dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO (
      ID BIGINT,
      FILLER VARCHAR(100)
      );

      INSERT INTO dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO WITH (TABLOCK)
      SELECT
      ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) % 15
      , REPLICATE('Z', 100)
      FROM master..spt_values t1
      CROSS JOIN master..spt_values t2;






      sql-server sql-server-2017






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 2 hours ago









      Joe ObbishJoe Obbish

      22.3k43493




      22.3k43493




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          I am able to get the desired plan shape with a serial loop join when all of the following are true:



          • An APPLY or CROSS JOIN is used instead of UNPIVOT

          • The APPLY contains no outer references

          • The source of rows in the APPLY is a table value constructor as opposed to a table

          For example, here is one way to do it:



          SELECT A, B
          FROM
          (
          SELECT A
          , MAX(
          CASE
          WHEN A = 'VAL1' THEN VAL1
          WHEN A = 'VAL2' THEN VAL2
          WHEN A = 'VAL3' THEN VAL3
          WHEN A = 'VAL4' THEN VAL4
          WHEN A = 'VAL5' THEN VAL5
          WHEN A = 'VAL6' THEN VAL6
          WHEN A = 'VAL7' THEN VAL7
          WHEN A = 'VAL16' THEN VAL16
          ELSE NULL
          END
          ) B
          FROM (
          SELECT
          MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
          FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
          ) q
          CROSS APPLY (
          VALUES ('VAL1'), ('VAL2'), ('VAL3'), ('VAL4'),
          ('VAL5'), ('VAL6'), ('VAL7'), ('VAL16')
          ) ca (A)
          GROUP BY A
          ) q
          WHERE q.B IS NOT NULL
          OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


          I get the desired plan plan shape as claimed with just one parallel branch:



          enter image description here



          I tried many other things that did not work. This answer is unsatisfactory in that I don't know why it works and it may not work in a future version of SQL Server, but it did solve my problem.






          share|improve this answer























          • I love APPLY versus UNPIVOT, but one would expect the declarative nature of T-SQL to result in the same plan shape for both variants. It'll be interesting to see what happens with this.

            – Max Vernon
            1 hour ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "182"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f236732%2fhow-can-i-get-rid-of-an-unhelpful-parallel-branch-when-unpivoting-a-single-row%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          I am able to get the desired plan shape with a serial loop join when all of the following are true:



          • An APPLY or CROSS JOIN is used instead of UNPIVOT

          • The APPLY contains no outer references

          • The source of rows in the APPLY is a table value constructor as opposed to a table

          For example, here is one way to do it:



          SELECT A, B
          FROM
          (
          SELECT A
          , MAX(
          CASE
          WHEN A = 'VAL1' THEN VAL1
          WHEN A = 'VAL2' THEN VAL2
          WHEN A = 'VAL3' THEN VAL3
          WHEN A = 'VAL4' THEN VAL4
          WHEN A = 'VAL5' THEN VAL5
          WHEN A = 'VAL6' THEN VAL6
          WHEN A = 'VAL7' THEN VAL7
          WHEN A = 'VAL16' THEN VAL16
          ELSE NULL
          END
          ) B
          FROM (
          SELECT
          MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
          FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
          ) q
          CROSS APPLY (
          VALUES ('VAL1'), ('VAL2'), ('VAL3'), ('VAL4'),
          ('VAL5'), ('VAL6'), ('VAL7'), ('VAL16')
          ) ca (A)
          GROUP BY A
          ) q
          WHERE q.B IS NOT NULL
          OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


          I get the desired plan plan shape as claimed with just one parallel branch:



          enter image description here



          I tried many other things that did not work. This answer is unsatisfactory in that I don't know why it works and it may not work in a future version of SQL Server, but it did solve my problem.






          share|improve this answer























          • I love APPLY versus UNPIVOT, but one would expect the declarative nature of T-SQL to result in the same plan shape for both variants. It'll be interesting to see what happens with this.

            – Max Vernon
            1 hour ago















          3














          I am able to get the desired plan shape with a serial loop join when all of the following are true:



          • An APPLY or CROSS JOIN is used instead of UNPIVOT

          • The APPLY contains no outer references

          • The source of rows in the APPLY is a table value constructor as opposed to a table

          For example, here is one way to do it:



          SELECT A, B
          FROM
          (
          SELECT A
          , MAX(
          CASE
          WHEN A = 'VAL1' THEN VAL1
          WHEN A = 'VAL2' THEN VAL2
          WHEN A = 'VAL3' THEN VAL3
          WHEN A = 'VAL4' THEN VAL4
          WHEN A = 'VAL5' THEN VAL5
          WHEN A = 'VAL6' THEN VAL6
          WHEN A = 'VAL7' THEN VAL7
          WHEN A = 'VAL16' THEN VAL16
          ELSE NULL
          END
          ) B
          FROM (
          SELECT
          MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
          FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
          ) q
          CROSS APPLY (
          VALUES ('VAL1'), ('VAL2'), ('VAL3'), ('VAL4'),
          ('VAL5'), ('VAL6'), ('VAL7'), ('VAL16')
          ) ca (A)
          GROUP BY A
          ) q
          WHERE q.B IS NOT NULL
          OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


          I get the desired plan plan shape as claimed with just one parallel branch:



          enter image description here



          I tried many other things that did not work. This answer is unsatisfactory in that I don't know why it works and it may not work in a future version of SQL Server, but it did solve my problem.






          share|improve this answer























          • I love APPLY versus UNPIVOT, but one would expect the declarative nature of T-SQL to result in the same plan shape for both variants. It'll be interesting to see what happens with this.

            – Max Vernon
            1 hour ago













          3












          3








          3







          I am able to get the desired plan shape with a serial loop join when all of the following are true:



          • An APPLY or CROSS JOIN is used instead of UNPIVOT

          • The APPLY contains no outer references

          • The source of rows in the APPLY is a table value constructor as opposed to a table

          For example, here is one way to do it:



          SELECT A, B
          FROM
          (
          SELECT A
          , MAX(
          CASE
          WHEN A = 'VAL1' THEN VAL1
          WHEN A = 'VAL2' THEN VAL2
          WHEN A = 'VAL3' THEN VAL3
          WHEN A = 'VAL4' THEN VAL4
          WHEN A = 'VAL5' THEN VAL5
          WHEN A = 'VAL6' THEN VAL6
          WHEN A = 'VAL7' THEN VAL7
          WHEN A = 'VAL16' THEN VAL16
          ELSE NULL
          END
          ) B
          FROM (
          SELECT
          MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
          FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
          ) q
          CROSS APPLY (
          VALUES ('VAL1'), ('VAL2'), ('VAL3'), ('VAL4'),
          ('VAL5'), ('VAL6'), ('VAL7'), ('VAL16')
          ) ca (A)
          GROUP BY A
          ) q
          WHERE q.B IS NOT NULL
          OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


          I get the desired plan plan shape as claimed with just one parallel branch:



          enter image description here



          I tried many other things that did not work. This answer is unsatisfactory in that I don't know why it works and it may not work in a future version of SQL Server, but it did solve my problem.






          share|improve this answer













          I am able to get the desired plan shape with a serial loop join when all of the following are true:



          • An APPLY or CROSS JOIN is used instead of UNPIVOT

          • The APPLY contains no outer references

          • The source of rows in the APPLY is a table value constructor as opposed to a table

          For example, here is one way to do it:



          SELECT A, B
          FROM
          (
          SELECT A
          , MAX(
          CASE
          WHEN A = 'VAL1' THEN VAL1
          WHEN A = 'VAL2' THEN VAL2
          WHEN A = 'VAL3' THEN VAL3
          WHEN A = 'VAL4' THEN VAL4
          WHEN A = 'VAL5' THEN VAL5
          WHEN A = 'VAL6' THEN VAL6
          WHEN A = 'VAL7' THEN VAL7
          WHEN A = 'VAL16' THEN VAL16
          ELSE NULL
          END
          ) B
          FROM (
          SELECT
          MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
          FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
          ) q
          CROSS APPLY (
          VALUES ('VAL1'), ('VAL2'), ('VAL3'), ('VAL4'),
          ('VAL5'), ('VAL6'), ('VAL7'), ('VAL16')
          ) ca (A)
          GROUP BY A
          ) q
          WHERE q.B IS NOT NULL
          OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


          I get the desired plan plan shape as claimed with just one parallel branch:



          enter image description here



          I tried many other things that did not work. This answer is unsatisfactory in that I don't know why it works and it may not work in a future version of SQL Server, but it did solve my problem.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          Joe ObbishJoe Obbish

          22.3k43493




          22.3k43493












          • I love APPLY versus UNPIVOT, but one would expect the declarative nature of T-SQL to result in the same plan shape for both variants. It'll be interesting to see what happens with this.

            – Max Vernon
            1 hour ago

















          • I love APPLY versus UNPIVOT, but one would expect the declarative nature of T-SQL to result in the same plan shape for both variants. It'll be interesting to see what happens with this.

            – Max Vernon
            1 hour ago
















          I love APPLY versus UNPIVOT, but one would expect the declarative nature of T-SQL to result in the same plan shape for both variants. It'll be interesting to see what happens with this.

          – Max Vernon
          1 hour ago





          I love APPLY versus UNPIVOT, but one would expect the declarative nature of T-SQL to result in the same plan shape for both variants. It'll be interesting to see what happens with this.

          – Max Vernon
          1 hour ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f236732%2fhow-can-i-get-rid-of-an-unhelpful-parallel-branch-when-unpivoting-a-single-row%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її