What should I call bands of armed men in Medieval Times?Where did the families of constables live in the middle ages?How did cities operate in medieval times?What were birthdays like in Medieval times?Did men carry talisman on them against threats or to bring luck during Medieval Times?What was preventing the populace from progressing in medieval times?Were there any role-playing games in medieval times?What techniques were used to make rings in medieval times?

Plausibility of Ice Eaters in the Arctic

How quickly could a country build a tall concrete wall around a city?

Is it really ~648.69 km/s delta-v to "land" on the surface of the Sun?

Are differences between uniformly distributed numbers uniformly distributed?

Christian apologetics regarding the killing of innocent children during the Genesis flood

Trying to write a shell script that keeps testing a server remotely, but it keeps falling in else statement when I logout

How should an administrative assistant reply to student addressing them as "Professor" or "Doctor"?

English - Acceptable use of parentheses in an author's name

Are there any financial disadvantages to living significantly "below your means"?

Opposite for desideratum to mean "something not wished for"

What does Apple mean by "This may decrease battery life"?

Why do oscilloscopes use SMPSes instead of linear power supplies?

changing number of arguments to a function in secondary evaluation

How are you supposed to know the strumming pattern for a song from the "chord sheet music"?

Why are Gatwick's runways too close together?

Understanding the point of a kölsche Witz

how to differentiate when a child lwc component is called twice in parent component?

Generate Brainfuck for the numbers 1–255

AsyncDictionary - Can you break thread safety?

Why isn’t SHA-3 in wider use?

The cat ate your input again!

Should you play baroque pieces a semitone lower?

How does 'AND' distribute over 'OR' (Set Theory)?

Author changing name



What should I call bands of armed men in Medieval Times?


Where did the families of constables live in the middle ages?How did cities operate in medieval times?What were birthdays like in Medieval times?Did men carry talisman on them against threats or to bring luck during Medieval Times?What was preventing the populace from progressing in medieval times?Were there any role-playing games in medieval times?What techniques were used to make rings in medieval times?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I am writing a fiction short story roughly based off medieval times in Europe. In it I have a group of men who live in a castle and fight for the castle's lord. (They mainly protect the surrounding villages from a group of bandits.)
If they existed in modern day times I'd refer to them as soldiers. They are much like traditional knights, only they're a whole group, they've never been knighted and aren't members of nobility.
What might they be called? I'm looking for a term, from sometime in the medieval time period (I don't care when), that the surrounding villagers would call them by.
Are the terms vavasseur or sergeant appropriate? Is there another better term?










share|improve this question









New contributor



user613 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    To answer this in a realistic mannor, a timeframe and locality within Europe is required (Areas inside Europe envolved differently, thus requiring a general timeframe for a given area). Otherwise this question may be deemed by others as too vague/general or (which is worse) determined as a question asked solely for the purpose of us to do your research for you.

    – Mark Johnson
    8 hours ago











  • Look at garrisons.

    – justCal
    7 hours ago

















2















I am writing a fiction short story roughly based off medieval times in Europe. In it I have a group of men who live in a castle and fight for the castle's lord. (They mainly protect the surrounding villages from a group of bandits.)
If they existed in modern day times I'd refer to them as soldiers. They are much like traditional knights, only they're a whole group, they've never been knighted and aren't members of nobility.
What might they be called? I'm looking for a term, from sometime in the medieval time period (I don't care when), that the surrounding villagers would call them by.
Are the terms vavasseur or sergeant appropriate? Is there another better term?










share|improve this question









New contributor



user613 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    To answer this in a realistic mannor, a timeframe and locality within Europe is required (Areas inside Europe envolved differently, thus requiring a general timeframe for a given area). Otherwise this question may be deemed by others as too vague/general or (which is worse) determined as a question asked solely for the purpose of us to do your research for you.

    – Mark Johnson
    8 hours ago











  • Look at garrisons.

    – justCal
    7 hours ago













2












2








2








I am writing a fiction short story roughly based off medieval times in Europe. In it I have a group of men who live in a castle and fight for the castle's lord. (They mainly protect the surrounding villages from a group of bandits.)
If they existed in modern day times I'd refer to them as soldiers. They are much like traditional knights, only they're a whole group, they've never been knighted and aren't members of nobility.
What might they be called? I'm looking for a term, from sometime in the medieval time period (I don't care when), that the surrounding villagers would call them by.
Are the terms vavasseur or sergeant appropriate? Is there another better term?










share|improve this question









New contributor



user613 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I am writing a fiction short story roughly based off medieval times in Europe. In it I have a group of men who live in a castle and fight for the castle's lord. (They mainly protect the surrounding villages from a group of bandits.)
If they existed in modern day times I'd refer to them as soldiers. They are much like traditional knights, only they're a whole group, they've never been knighted and aren't members of nobility.
What might they be called? I'm looking for a term, from sometime in the medieval time period (I don't care when), that the surrounding villagers would call them by.
Are the terms vavasseur or sergeant appropriate? Is there another better term?







middle-ages europe






share|improve this question









New contributor



user613 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



user613 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









Pieter Geerkens

44.1k6 gold badges127 silver badges206 bronze badges




44.1k6 gold badges127 silver badges206 bronze badges






New contributor



user613 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









user613user613

111 bronze badge




111 bronze badge




New contributor



user613 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




user613 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • 2





    To answer this in a realistic mannor, a timeframe and locality within Europe is required (Areas inside Europe envolved differently, thus requiring a general timeframe for a given area). Otherwise this question may be deemed by others as too vague/general or (which is worse) determined as a question asked solely for the purpose of us to do your research for you.

    – Mark Johnson
    8 hours ago











  • Look at garrisons.

    – justCal
    7 hours ago












  • 2





    To answer this in a realistic mannor, a timeframe and locality within Europe is required (Areas inside Europe envolved differently, thus requiring a general timeframe for a given area). Otherwise this question may be deemed by others as too vague/general or (which is worse) determined as a question asked solely for the purpose of us to do your research for you.

    – Mark Johnson
    8 hours ago











  • Look at garrisons.

    – justCal
    7 hours ago







2




2





To answer this in a realistic mannor, a timeframe and locality within Europe is required (Areas inside Europe envolved differently, thus requiring a general timeframe for a given area). Otherwise this question may be deemed by others as too vague/general or (which is worse) determined as a question asked solely for the purpose of us to do your research for you.

– Mark Johnson
8 hours ago





To answer this in a realistic mannor, a timeframe and locality within Europe is required (Areas inside Europe envolved differently, thus requiring a general timeframe for a given area). Otherwise this question may be deemed by others as too vague/general or (which is worse) determined as a question asked solely for the purpose of us to do your research for you.

– Mark Johnson
8 hours ago













Look at garrisons.

– justCal
7 hours ago





Look at garrisons.

– justCal
7 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














They are Men at arms, professional soldiers.



The lance fourni of a knight, the unit of soldiers a knight brought to battles or protected the fief, was formed by professional horse-riders, archers and/or spearmen. They were also called men at arms, so the sergeant/marischal in charge of your unit could be a knight or a common man (a yeoman if you heavily borrow from English history).






share|improve this answer

























  • They could also be called mercenaries. Indeed, they usually were mercenaries however they were called in practice.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    2 hours ago











  • @DenisdeBernardy: That is incorrect. Every knight was required to show up with a retinue of grooms and men-at-arms as part of his feudal fee when called to arms by his lord. Feudal men-at arms outnumbered mercenaries very considerably in every medieval battle I am aware of. Consider Crecy: the French army comprise over 10,000 feudal men-at-arms (termed common infantry in the link but only 2,000 to 6,000 mercenary crossbowmen. At Agincourt the English longbowmen were entirely feudal levy.

    – Pieter Geerkens
    2 hours ago



















0














As Carlos Martin has noted, these soldiers are men at arms. They might be armed with swords, bows or crossbows, spears, or halberds depending on precise period and geographic origin. Generally they would be responsible for their own arms and armour, but a wealthier lord might choose to upgrade that in order to field a more impressive and effective force.



Groups numbering in the range 10-20 would be commanded by a sergeant, and might be termed a peloton (the French root of our modern platoon), troupe, or escadre (French root of modern squad) without being too anachronistic. Larger groups, composed of multiple pelotons, would be termed a company and commanded by a captain assisted by a lieutenant. Within a single levy, either mercenary or feudal, there would be some consistency in peloton size, but there need not be complete consistency between companies of different origin, other than the general pattern just described. In companies of several pelotons the most senior sergeant would be the sergeant major.



If the company is of such a size to fight as two separate wings, the captain and lieutenant would command one each. If large enough to deserve three wings, then the captain would command the centre with the lieutenant and sergeant-major each commanding a wing to his left and right. A mercenary company might be as large as two or three hundred men in the later part of the period.



This answer about living arrangements for a castle's Constable notes that the castles built in Wales by Edward I generally were designed to support a garrison of slightly more than 30 men.






share|improve this answer





























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "324"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    user613 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f54083%2fwhat-should-i-call-bands-of-armed-men-in-medieval-times%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    They are Men at arms, professional soldiers.



    The lance fourni of a knight, the unit of soldiers a knight brought to battles or protected the fief, was formed by professional horse-riders, archers and/or spearmen. They were also called men at arms, so the sergeant/marischal in charge of your unit could be a knight or a common man (a yeoman if you heavily borrow from English history).






    share|improve this answer

























    • They could also be called mercenaries. Indeed, they usually were mercenaries however they were called in practice.

      – Denis de Bernardy
      2 hours ago











    • @DenisdeBernardy: That is incorrect. Every knight was required to show up with a retinue of grooms and men-at-arms as part of his feudal fee when called to arms by his lord. Feudal men-at arms outnumbered mercenaries very considerably in every medieval battle I am aware of. Consider Crecy: the French army comprise over 10,000 feudal men-at-arms (termed common infantry in the link but only 2,000 to 6,000 mercenary crossbowmen. At Agincourt the English longbowmen were entirely feudal levy.

      – Pieter Geerkens
      2 hours ago
















    4














    They are Men at arms, professional soldiers.



    The lance fourni of a knight, the unit of soldiers a knight brought to battles or protected the fief, was formed by professional horse-riders, archers and/or spearmen. They were also called men at arms, so the sergeant/marischal in charge of your unit could be a knight or a common man (a yeoman if you heavily borrow from English history).






    share|improve this answer

























    • They could also be called mercenaries. Indeed, they usually were mercenaries however they were called in practice.

      – Denis de Bernardy
      2 hours ago











    • @DenisdeBernardy: That is incorrect. Every knight was required to show up with a retinue of grooms and men-at-arms as part of his feudal fee when called to arms by his lord. Feudal men-at arms outnumbered mercenaries very considerably in every medieval battle I am aware of. Consider Crecy: the French army comprise over 10,000 feudal men-at-arms (termed common infantry in the link but only 2,000 to 6,000 mercenary crossbowmen. At Agincourt the English longbowmen were entirely feudal levy.

      – Pieter Geerkens
      2 hours ago














    4












    4








    4







    They are Men at arms, professional soldiers.



    The lance fourni of a knight, the unit of soldiers a knight brought to battles or protected the fief, was formed by professional horse-riders, archers and/or spearmen. They were also called men at arms, so the sergeant/marischal in charge of your unit could be a knight or a common man (a yeoman if you heavily borrow from English history).






    share|improve this answer













    They are Men at arms, professional soldiers.



    The lance fourni of a knight, the unit of soldiers a knight brought to battles or protected the fief, was formed by professional horse-riders, archers and/or spearmen. They were also called men at arms, so the sergeant/marischal in charge of your unit could be a knight or a common man (a yeoman if you heavily borrow from English history).







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 7 hours ago









    Carlos MartinCarlos Martin

    3311 silver badge3 bronze badges




    3311 silver badge3 bronze badges















    • They could also be called mercenaries. Indeed, they usually were mercenaries however they were called in practice.

      – Denis de Bernardy
      2 hours ago











    • @DenisdeBernardy: That is incorrect. Every knight was required to show up with a retinue of grooms and men-at-arms as part of his feudal fee when called to arms by his lord. Feudal men-at arms outnumbered mercenaries very considerably in every medieval battle I am aware of. Consider Crecy: the French army comprise over 10,000 feudal men-at-arms (termed common infantry in the link but only 2,000 to 6,000 mercenary crossbowmen. At Agincourt the English longbowmen were entirely feudal levy.

      – Pieter Geerkens
      2 hours ago


















    • They could also be called mercenaries. Indeed, they usually were mercenaries however they were called in practice.

      – Denis de Bernardy
      2 hours ago











    • @DenisdeBernardy: That is incorrect. Every knight was required to show up with a retinue of grooms and men-at-arms as part of his feudal fee when called to arms by his lord. Feudal men-at arms outnumbered mercenaries very considerably in every medieval battle I am aware of. Consider Crecy: the French army comprise over 10,000 feudal men-at-arms (termed common infantry in the link but only 2,000 to 6,000 mercenary crossbowmen. At Agincourt the English longbowmen were entirely feudal levy.

      – Pieter Geerkens
      2 hours ago

















    They could also be called mercenaries. Indeed, they usually were mercenaries however they were called in practice.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    2 hours ago





    They could also be called mercenaries. Indeed, they usually were mercenaries however they were called in practice.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    2 hours ago













    @DenisdeBernardy: That is incorrect. Every knight was required to show up with a retinue of grooms and men-at-arms as part of his feudal fee when called to arms by his lord. Feudal men-at arms outnumbered mercenaries very considerably in every medieval battle I am aware of. Consider Crecy: the French army comprise over 10,000 feudal men-at-arms (termed common infantry in the link but only 2,000 to 6,000 mercenary crossbowmen. At Agincourt the English longbowmen were entirely feudal levy.

    – Pieter Geerkens
    2 hours ago






    @DenisdeBernardy: That is incorrect. Every knight was required to show up with a retinue of grooms and men-at-arms as part of his feudal fee when called to arms by his lord. Feudal men-at arms outnumbered mercenaries very considerably in every medieval battle I am aware of. Consider Crecy: the French army comprise over 10,000 feudal men-at-arms (termed common infantry in the link but only 2,000 to 6,000 mercenary crossbowmen. At Agincourt the English longbowmen were entirely feudal levy.

    – Pieter Geerkens
    2 hours ago














    0














    As Carlos Martin has noted, these soldiers are men at arms. They might be armed with swords, bows or crossbows, spears, or halberds depending on precise period and geographic origin. Generally they would be responsible for their own arms and armour, but a wealthier lord might choose to upgrade that in order to field a more impressive and effective force.



    Groups numbering in the range 10-20 would be commanded by a sergeant, and might be termed a peloton (the French root of our modern platoon), troupe, or escadre (French root of modern squad) without being too anachronistic. Larger groups, composed of multiple pelotons, would be termed a company and commanded by a captain assisted by a lieutenant. Within a single levy, either mercenary or feudal, there would be some consistency in peloton size, but there need not be complete consistency between companies of different origin, other than the general pattern just described. In companies of several pelotons the most senior sergeant would be the sergeant major.



    If the company is of such a size to fight as two separate wings, the captain and lieutenant would command one each. If large enough to deserve three wings, then the captain would command the centre with the lieutenant and sergeant-major each commanding a wing to his left and right. A mercenary company might be as large as two or three hundred men in the later part of the period.



    This answer about living arrangements for a castle's Constable notes that the castles built in Wales by Edward I generally were designed to support a garrison of slightly more than 30 men.






    share|improve this answer































      0














      As Carlos Martin has noted, these soldiers are men at arms. They might be armed with swords, bows or crossbows, spears, or halberds depending on precise period and geographic origin. Generally they would be responsible for their own arms and armour, but a wealthier lord might choose to upgrade that in order to field a more impressive and effective force.



      Groups numbering in the range 10-20 would be commanded by a sergeant, and might be termed a peloton (the French root of our modern platoon), troupe, or escadre (French root of modern squad) without being too anachronistic. Larger groups, composed of multiple pelotons, would be termed a company and commanded by a captain assisted by a lieutenant. Within a single levy, either mercenary or feudal, there would be some consistency in peloton size, but there need not be complete consistency between companies of different origin, other than the general pattern just described. In companies of several pelotons the most senior sergeant would be the sergeant major.



      If the company is of such a size to fight as two separate wings, the captain and lieutenant would command one each. If large enough to deserve three wings, then the captain would command the centre with the lieutenant and sergeant-major each commanding a wing to his left and right. A mercenary company might be as large as two or three hundred men in the later part of the period.



      This answer about living arrangements for a castle's Constable notes that the castles built in Wales by Edward I generally were designed to support a garrison of slightly more than 30 men.






      share|improve this answer





























        0












        0








        0







        As Carlos Martin has noted, these soldiers are men at arms. They might be armed with swords, bows or crossbows, spears, or halberds depending on precise period and geographic origin. Generally they would be responsible for their own arms and armour, but a wealthier lord might choose to upgrade that in order to field a more impressive and effective force.



        Groups numbering in the range 10-20 would be commanded by a sergeant, and might be termed a peloton (the French root of our modern platoon), troupe, or escadre (French root of modern squad) without being too anachronistic. Larger groups, composed of multiple pelotons, would be termed a company and commanded by a captain assisted by a lieutenant. Within a single levy, either mercenary or feudal, there would be some consistency in peloton size, but there need not be complete consistency between companies of different origin, other than the general pattern just described. In companies of several pelotons the most senior sergeant would be the sergeant major.



        If the company is of such a size to fight as two separate wings, the captain and lieutenant would command one each. If large enough to deserve three wings, then the captain would command the centre with the lieutenant and sergeant-major each commanding a wing to his left and right. A mercenary company might be as large as two or three hundred men in the later part of the period.



        This answer about living arrangements for a castle's Constable notes that the castles built in Wales by Edward I generally were designed to support a garrison of slightly more than 30 men.






        share|improve this answer















        As Carlos Martin has noted, these soldiers are men at arms. They might be armed with swords, bows or crossbows, spears, or halberds depending on precise period and geographic origin. Generally they would be responsible for their own arms and armour, but a wealthier lord might choose to upgrade that in order to field a more impressive and effective force.



        Groups numbering in the range 10-20 would be commanded by a sergeant, and might be termed a peloton (the French root of our modern platoon), troupe, or escadre (French root of modern squad) without being too anachronistic. Larger groups, composed of multiple pelotons, would be termed a company and commanded by a captain assisted by a lieutenant. Within a single levy, either mercenary or feudal, there would be some consistency in peloton size, but there need not be complete consistency between companies of different origin, other than the general pattern just described. In companies of several pelotons the most senior sergeant would be the sergeant major.



        If the company is of such a size to fight as two separate wings, the captain and lieutenant would command one each. If large enough to deserve three wings, then the captain would command the centre with the lieutenant and sergeant-major each commanding a wing to his left and right. A mercenary company might be as large as two or three hundred men in the later part of the period.



        This answer about living arrangements for a castle's Constable notes that the castles built in Wales by Edward I generally were designed to support a garrison of slightly more than 30 men.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 3 hours ago

























        answered 3 hours ago









        Pieter GeerkensPieter Geerkens

        44.1k6 gold badges127 silver badges206 bronze badges




        44.1k6 gold badges127 silver badges206 bronze badges























            user613 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            user613 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            user613 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            user613 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f54083%2fwhat-should-i-call-bands-of-armed-men-in-medieval-times%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480