Which failed attempts have there been to find a contradiction in ZFC or ZF?Nelson's program to show inconsistency of ZFSilver's approach to the inconsistency of $ZFC$Is there a computable model of ZFC?Interpretation of the Second Incompleteness TheoremMartin's Axiom and Determinacy-axioms: independence resultsIf ZFC has a transitive model, does it have one of arbitrary size?A question about sentences in the language of first order ZFC which assert the existence of cardinal numbersWholeness Axiom and Ultimate LIs there a proof (maybe formulated by Feferman) which says that a proof about the (in)consistency of ZFC is unachievable?Silver's approach to the inconsistency of $ZFC$Experiments physically performable in a finite amount of time whose results are independent of ZFCExistence of a model of ZFC in which the natural numbers are really the natural numbers

Which failed attempts have there been to find a contradiction in ZFC or ZF?


Nelson's program to show inconsistency of ZFSilver's approach to the inconsistency of $ZFC$Is there a computable model of ZFC?Interpretation of the Second Incompleteness TheoremMartin's Axiom and Determinacy-axioms: independence resultsIf ZFC has a transitive model, does it have one of arbitrary size?A question about sentences in the language of first order ZFC which assert the existence of cardinal numbersWholeness Axiom and Ultimate LIs there a proof (maybe formulated by Feferman) which says that a proof about the (in)consistency of ZFC is unachievable?Silver's approach to the inconsistency of $ZFC$Experiments physically performable in a finite amount of time whose results are independent of ZFCExistence of a model of ZFC in which the natural numbers are really the natural numbers













3












$begingroup$


Can you provide any failed attempts to prove that ZF or ZFC to be inconsistent?



References to articles in the literature if there are any will be much appreciated.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I assume you want attempts by competent mathematicians (not cranks). Competent set theorists who doubt the consistency of ZFC are rare, and ones who have seriously sought a contradiction are even rarer. The only example that comes to mind is Jack Silver, who didn't publish failed attempts, but did publish a lot of good set theory arising from those attempts. See mathoverflow.net/questions/260944 for a little information about that.
    $endgroup$
    – Andreas Blass
    7 hours ago
















3












$begingroup$


Can you provide any failed attempts to prove that ZF or ZFC to be inconsistent?



References to articles in the literature if there are any will be much appreciated.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I assume you want attempts by competent mathematicians (not cranks). Competent set theorists who doubt the consistency of ZFC are rare, and ones who have seriously sought a contradiction are even rarer. The only example that comes to mind is Jack Silver, who didn't publish failed attempts, but did publish a lot of good set theory arising from those attempts. See mathoverflow.net/questions/260944 for a little information about that.
    $endgroup$
    – Andreas Blass
    7 hours ago














3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


Can you provide any failed attempts to prove that ZF or ZFC to be inconsistent?



References to articles in the literature if there are any will be much appreciated.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Can you provide any failed attempts to prove that ZF or ZFC to be inconsistent?



References to articles in the literature if there are any will be much appreciated.



Thanks!







set-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









AlanAlan

5984 silver badges14 bronze badges




5984 silver badges14 bronze badges







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I assume you want attempts by competent mathematicians (not cranks). Competent set theorists who doubt the consistency of ZFC are rare, and ones who have seriously sought a contradiction are even rarer. The only example that comes to mind is Jack Silver, who didn't publish failed attempts, but did publish a lot of good set theory arising from those attempts. See mathoverflow.net/questions/260944 for a little information about that.
    $endgroup$
    – Andreas Blass
    7 hours ago













  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I assume you want attempts by competent mathematicians (not cranks). Competent set theorists who doubt the consistency of ZFC are rare, and ones who have seriously sought a contradiction are even rarer. The only example that comes to mind is Jack Silver, who didn't publish failed attempts, but did publish a lot of good set theory arising from those attempts. See mathoverflow.net/questions/260944 for a little information about that.
    $endgroup$
    – Andreas Blass
    7 hours ago








5




5




$begingroup$
I assume you want attempts by competent mathematicians (not cranks). Competent set theorists who doubt the consistency of ZFC are rare, and ones who have seriously sought a contradiction are even rarer. The only example that comes to mind is Jack Silver, who didn't publish failed attempts, but did publish a lot of good set theory arising from those attempts. See mathoverflow.net/questions/260944 for a little information about that.
$endgroup$
– Andreas Blass
7 hours ago





$begingroup$
I assume you want attempts by competent mathematicians (not cranks). Competent set theorists who doubt the consistency of ZFC are rare, and ones who have seriously sought a contradiction are even rarer. The only example that comes to mind is Jack Silver, who didn't publish failed attempts, but did publish a lot of good set theory arising from those attempts. See mathoverflow.net/questions/260944 for a little information about that.
$endgroup$
– Andreas Blass
7 hours ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

I think the most noticeable one was Nelson's attempt to prove the inconsistency of primitive recursive arithmetic. Terence Tao found a mistake in the proof, but his attempt was posthumously uploaded to arxiv (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.09209.pdf), together with an introduction by Sarah Jones Nelson and an afterword by Sam Buss and Terence Tao himself.



Nelson was amongst the very few serious mathematicians who supported the view that arithmetic was indeed inconsistent, based on his ultrafinitist philosophy.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This might also be relevant mathoverflow.net/questions/36693/…
    $endgroup$
    – Qfwfq
    7 hours ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f336545%2fwhich-failed-attempts-have-there-been-to-find-a-contradiction-in-zfc-or-zf%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8












$begingroup$

I think the most noticeable one was Nelson's attempt to prove the inconsistency of primitive recursive arithmetic. Terence Tao found a mistake in the proof, but his attempt was posthumously uploaded to arxiv (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.09209.pdf), together with an introduction by Sarah Jones Nelson and an afterword by Sam Buss and Terence Tao himself.



Nelson was amongst the very few serious mathematicians who supported the view that arithmetic was indeed inconsistent, based on his ultrafinitist philosophy.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This might also be relevant mathoverflow.net/questions/36693/…
    $endgroup$
    – Qfwfq
    7 hours ago















8












$begingroup$

I think the most noticeable one was Nelson's attempt to prove the inconsistency of primitive recursive arithmetic. Terence Tao found a mistake in the proof, but his attempt was posthumously uploaded to arxiv (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.09209.pdf), together with an introduction by Sarah Jones Nelson and an afterword by Sam Buss and Terence Tao himself.



Nelson was amongst the very few serious mathematicians who supported the view that arithmetic was indeed inconsistent, based on his ultrafinitist philosophy.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This might also be relevant mathoverflow.net/questions/36693/…
    $endgroup$
    – Qfwfq
    7 hours ago













8












8








8





$begingroup$

I think the most noticeable one was Nelson's attempt to prove the inconsistency of primitive recursive arithmetic. Terence Tao found a mistake in the proof, but his attempt was posthumously uploaded to arxiv (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.09209.pdf), together with an introduction by Sarah Jones Nelson and an afterword by Sam Buss and Terence Tao himself.



Nelson was amongst the very few serious mathematicians who supported the view that arithmetic was indeed inconsistent, based on his ultrafinitist philosophy.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



I think the most noticeable one was Nelson's attempt to prove the inconsistency of primitive recursive arithmetic. Terence Tao found a mistake in the proof, but his attempt was posthumously uploaded to arxiv (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.09209.pdf), together with an introduction by Sarah Jones Nelson and an afterword by Sam Buss and Terence Tao himself.



Nelson was amongst the very few serious mathematicians who supported the view that arithmetic was indeed inconsistent, based on his ultrafinitist philosophy.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 7 hours ago









godeliangodelian

2,5791 gold badge22 silver badges23 bronze badges




2,5791 gold badge22 silver badges23 bronze badges











  • $begingroup$
    This might also be relevant mathoverflow.net/questions/36693/…
    $endgroup$
    – Qfwfq
    7 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    This might also be relevant mathoverflow.net/questions/36693/…
    $endgroup$
    – Qfwfq
    7 hours ago















$begingroup$
This might also be relevant mathoverflow.net/questions/36693/…
$endgroup$
– Qfwfq
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
This might also be relevant mathoverflow.net/questions/36693/…
$endgroup$
– Qfwfq
7 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f336545%2fwhich-failed-attempts-have-there-been-to-find-a-contradiction-in-zfc-or-zf%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單