When did “&” stop being taught alongside the alphabet?When did the Hebrews stop speaking Hebrew and start speaking Aramaic?Why was not Greek alphabet adopted by other languages given the Greek influence?When did the Greeks stop calling themselves “Roman”?What determined the order of letters in the alphabetWhy were schoolchildren in the USA taught virtually nothing about the Holocaust during the fifties and sixties?When did English become a major subject in Japanese schools?Is this alphabet from tawantinsuyu or is it a modern invention (from the latter centuries)?When did French become the official language of France?Is the adamic alphabet the origin of the Greek?When did “skipping” grades become common and when did it stop in USA?

Password Hashing Security Using Scrypt & Argon2

Object's height not a multiple of layer height

Why does Trump want a citizenship question on the census?

Is there a strong legal guarantee that the U.S. can give to another country that it won't attack them?

Four ships at the ocean with the same distance

Publishing papers seem natural to many, while I find it really hard to think novel stuff to pursue till publication. How to cope up with this?

What minifigure is this?

Users forgetting to regenerate PDF before sending it

Write a function

Was it ever illegal to name a pig "Napoleon" in France?

Need a non-volatile memory IC with near unlimited read/write operations capability

Estimates on number of topologies on a finite set

First Entry Member State schengen visa

US citizen traveling with Peruvian passport

Why does the Antonov AN-225 not have any winglets?

Conditions for Roots of a quadratic equation at infinity

Did depressed people far more accurately estimate how many monsters they killed in a video game?

Who buys a weak currency?

Found and corrected a mistake on someone's else paper -- praxis?

VHDL: is there a way to create an entity into which constants can be passed?

VHF 50 Ω Antenna Over 75 Ω TV Coax

When do flights get cancelled due to fog?

User Vs. Connected App

Adjust the Table



When did “&” stop being taught alongside the alphabet?


When did the Hebrews stop speaking Hebrew and start speaking Aramaic?Why was not Greek alphabet adopted by other languages given the Greek influence?When did the Greeks stop calling themselves “Roman”?What determined the order of letters in the alphabetWhy were schoolchildren in the USA taught virtually nothing about the Holocaust during the fifties and sixties?When did English become a major subject in Japanese schools?Is this alphabet from tawantinsuyu or is it a modern invention (from the latter centuries)?When did French become the official language of France?Is the adamic alphabet the origin of the Greek?When did “skipping” grades become common and when did it stop in USA?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5















I've recently discovered that "&" was taught alongside the alphabet letters. While not being considered a letter per se, many students must have seen '&' as effectively the 27th letter of the alphabet (at least the vast majority of websites I came across nowadays stated it was the 27th letter of the alphabet).



After reading “A Was an Apple Pie” Lyrics, which ends with



"W wanted it,

X, Y, Z and ampersand

All wished for a piece in hand."



I came across more detailed information on the website Fast Company, but that same information is repeated on many other websites. The story of the symbol is pretty clear and it is easy to follow. However, I'd like to know when the '&' stopped being taught alongside the alphabet.



I have come across a few comments referring someone's parents or grandparents being taught the alphabet with the ampersand until as late as the 1920s but I have no idea if such comments pertain to the US or the UK nor if the practice continued until later.










share|improve this question



















  • 3





    Ironically the name ampersand comes from its recitation as the end of the alphabeth: "x,y,z and per se and"

    – Denis Nardin
    8 hours ago







  • 2





    Probably worth including a link to "When did '&' stop being taught alongside the alphabet?" over on EL&U.

    – KillingTime
    8 hours ago











  • @KillingTime: I posted that question, which is on its way to being closed, the only answer being the clarification that '&' was never really considered a letter. That's why I headed over to this side.

    – Sara Costa
    7 hours ago











  • @DenisNardin, is that true? I'd heard a different myth (?) that there was a printer named "Amper(e)" who created that symbol, so it's "Amper's "and""... Comment?

    – paul garrett
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    @paulgarrett en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampersand#Etymology (yes, it is just wikipedia, but I found the same description in many other sources)

    – Denis Nardin
    7 hours ago


















5















I've recently discovered that "&" was taught alongside the alphabet letters. While not being considered a letter per se, many students must have seen '&' as effectively the 27th letter of the alphabet (at least the vast majority of websites I came across nowadays stated it was the 27th letter of the alphabet).



After reading “A Was an Apple Pie” Lyrics, which ends with



"W wanted it,

X, Y, Z and ampersand

All wished for a piece in hand."



I came across more detailed information on the website Fast Company, but that same information is repeated on many other websites. The story of the symbol is pretty clear and it is easy to follow. However, I'd like to know when the '&' stopped being taught alongside the alphabet.



I have come across a few comments referring someone's parents or grandparents being taught the alphabet with the ampersand until as late as the 1920s but I have no idea if such comments pertain to the US or the UK nor if the practice continued until later.










share|improve this question



















  • 3





    Ironically the name ampersand comes from its recitation as the end of the alphabeth: "x,y,z and per se and"

    – Denis Nardin
    8 hours ago







  • 2





    Probably worth including a link to "When did '&' stop being taught alongside the alphabet?" over on EL&U.

    – KillingTime
    8 hours ago











  • @KillingTime: I posted that question, which is on its way to being closed, the only answer being the clarification that '&' was never really considered a letter. That's why I headed over to this side.

    – Sara Costa
    7 hours ago











  • @DenisNardin, is that true? I'd heard a different myth (?) that there was a printer named "Amper(e)" who created that symbol, so it's "Amper's "and""... Comment?

    – paul garrett
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    @paulgarrett en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampersand#Etymology (yes, it is just wikipedia, but I found the same description in many other sources)

    – Denis Nardin
    7 hours ago














5












5








5


1






I've recently discovered that "&" was taught alongside the alphabet letters. While not being considered a letter per se, many students must have seen '&' as effectively the 27th letter of the alphabet (at least the vast majority of websites I came across nowadays stated it was the 27th letter of the alphabet).



After reading “A Was an Apple Pie” Lyrics, which ends with



"W wanted it,

X, Y, Z and ampersand

All wished for a piece in hand."



I came across more detailed information on the website Fast Company, but that same information is repeated on many other websites. The story of the symbol is pretty clear and it is easy to follow. However, I'd like to know when the '&' stopped being taught alongside the alphabet.



I have come across a few comments referring someone's parents or grandparents being taught the alphabet with the ampersand until as late as the 1920s but I have no idea if such comments pertain to the US or the UK nor if the practice continued until later.










share|improve this question
















I've recently discovered that "&" was taught alongside the alphabet letters. While not being considered a letter per se, many students must have seen '&' as effectively the 27th letter of the alphabet (at least the vast majority of websites I came across nowadays stated it was the 27th letter of the alphabet).



After reading “A Was an Apple Pie” Lyrics, which ends with



"W wanted it,

X, Y, Z and ampersand

All wished for a piece in hand."



I came across more detailed information on the website Fast Company, but that same information is repeated on many other websites. The story of the symbol is pretty clear and it is easy to follow. However, I'd like to know when the '&' stopped being taught alongside the alphabet.



I have come across a few comments referring someone's parents or grandparents being taught the alphabet with the ampersand until as late as the 1920s but I have no idea if such comments pertain to the US or the UK nor if the practice continued until later.







language education






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









LangLangC

32.8k5 gold badges103 silver badges162 bronze badges




32.8k5 gold badges103 silver badges162 bronze badges










asked 8 hours ago









Sara CostaSara Costa

5335 silver badges11 bronze badges




5335 silver badges11 bronze badges







  • 3





    Ironically the name ampersand comes from its recitation as the end of the alphabeth: "x,y,z and per se and"

    – Denis Nardin
    8 hours ago







  • 2





    Probably worth including a link to "When did '&' stop being taught alongside the alphabet?" over on EL&U.

    – KillingTime
    8 hours ago











  • @KillingTime: I posted that question, which is on its way to being closed, the only answer being the clarification that '&' was never really considered a letter. That's why I headed over to this side.

    – Sara Costa
    7 hours ago











  • @DenisNardin, is that true? I'd heard a different myth (?) that there was a printer named "Amper(e)" who created that symbol, so it's "Amper's "and""... Comment?

    – paul garrett
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    @paulgarrett en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampersand#Etymology (yes, it is just wikipedia, but I found the same description in many other sources)

    – Denis Nardin
    7 hours ago













  • 3





    Ironically the name ampersand comes from its recitation as the end of the alphabeth: "x,y,z and per se and"

    – Denis Nardin
    8 hours ago







  • 2





    Probably worth including a link to "When did '&' stop being taught alongside the alphabet?" over on EL&U.

    – KillingTime
    8 hours ago











  • @KillingTime: I posted that question, which is on its way to being closed, the only answer being the clarification that '&' was never really considered a letter. That's why I headed over to this side.

    – Sara Costa
    7 hours ago











  • @DenisNardin, is that true? I'd heard a different myth (?) that there was a printer named "Amper(e)" who created that symbol, so it's "Amper's "and""... Comment?

    – paul garrett
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    @paulgarrett en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampersand#Etymology (yes, it is just wikipedia, but I found the same description in many other sources)

    – Denis Nardin
    7 hours ago








3




3





Ironically the name ampersand comes from its recitation as the end of the alphabeth: "x,y,z and per se and"

– Denis Nardin
8 hours ago






Ironically the name ampersand comes from its recitation as the end of the alphabeth: "x,y,z and per se and"

– Denis Nardin
8 hours ago





2




2





Probably worth including a link to "When did '&' stop being taught alongside the alphabet?" over on EL&U.

– KillingTime
8 hours ago





Probably worth including a link to "When did '&' stop being taught alongside the alphabet?" over on EL&U.

– KillingTime
8 hours ago













@KillingTime: I posted that question, which is on its way to being closed, the only answer being the clarification that '&' was never really considered a letter. That's why I headed over to this side.

– Sara Costa
7 hours ago





@KillingTime: I posted that question, which is on its way to being closed, the only answer being the clarification that '&' was never really considered a letter. That's why I headed over to this side.

– Sara Costa
7 hours ago













@DenisNardin, is that true? I'd heard a different myth (?) that there was a printer named "Amper(e)" who created that symbol, so it's "Amper's "and""... Comment?

– paul garrett
7 hours ago





@DenisNardin, is that true? I'd heard a different myth (?) that there was a printer named "Amper(e)" who created that symbol, so it's "Amper's "and""... Comment?

– paul garrett
7 hours ago




2




2





@paulgarrett en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampersand#Etymology (yes, it is just wikipedia, but I found the same description in many other sources)

– Denis Nardin
7 hours ago






@paulgarrett en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampersand#Etymology (yes, it is just wikipedia, but I found the same description in many other sources)

– Denis Nardin
7 hours ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














Ironically, it seems to coincide with the addition of the very word ampersand to the dictionaries. But the process took a while to complete and a precise date seems to be undeterminable, not in the least because it wasn't universally adopted ever. The character got its corrupted name around 1837 and from then on lost popularity so much that by the late 1800s it was already distant memory for most.



A real watershed for its use in alphabet learning early readers' books seems to be 1857:




Even as late as 1857, & was printed in some early-reader books as the 27th letter of the alphabet. And it is the ampersand’s status as a letter that gave it the name by which we know it today, a name that first appeared in English in about 1835.
–– Stephen Webb: "Clash of Symbols. A Ride Through the Riches of Glyphs", Springer: Cham, 2018.




If that is indeed 'the year', then the ampersand as twenty-seventh letter of the alphabet appeared in "My Own Primer, or First Lessons in Spelling and Reading" (1857) by Rev. John P. Carter.
(–– Keith Houston: "Shady Characters. The Secret Life of Punctuation, Symbols & Other Typographical Marks", W. W. Norton & Company: New York, London, 2013.)



During the whole time various editions of for example John Walker: "A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary, and Expositor of the English Language ...: To which are Prefixed, Principles of English Pronunciation ... : the Whole Interspersed with Observations, Etymological, Critical, and Grammatical… ",
Tomas Tegg, 1827( checked until 1882) contained discussions about whether the English alphabet contains 24 or 26 letters 'properly', but has the 'per se et' listed as additional info outside of the alphabet (example)




Not really implausible speculations and reasoning around that to be found at How and why has the ampersand been removed from the alphabet?




When Old English was discarded in favor of the modern English were are now familiar with, the ampersand maintained its status of “member of the alphabet” (to coin a phrase) to a degree, with some regions and dialects opting to include it until the mid-1800s.



Except that it was not yet called an ampersand. The & sign was, rather, referred to simply as “and” — which made reciting the alphabet awkward. As Dictionary.com notes, it was (and is) odd to say “X Y Z and.” So, they didn’t. Instead, our lexicon developed another saying: “X, Y, and Z, and by itself, ‘and'” — but instead of saying “by itself,” the Latin phrase per se came into favor. The result? “And per se, and,” or, muttered quickly by a disinterested student, “ampersand.”



Why the inclusion of the ampersand in the alphabet fell out of use is anyone’s guess, but there is a good chance that credit goes to the ABC song we are most all familiar with — that is, the one which shares its tune with Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star (and borrows from Mozart’s Ah vous dirai-je, Maman). That song was copyrighted in 1835, around the time that the ampersand started falling out of favor with the rest of the ABCs.
–– "And, the 27th Letter of the Alphabet", NowIKnow, 2011.




And




It all begins with the Little Folks learning their ABCs. In the 1830s the alphabet started incorporating the symbol “&” as the 27th letter. From the Dixie Primer for the Little Folks:




And




  1. In the early 1800s, school children reciting their ABCs concluded the alphabet with the “&”. Since it was awkward to say, “X,Y,Z, and,” students said, “and per se and.” Per se means “by itself,” so the students were basically saying, “X,Y,Z, and by itself and.”


  2. By 1837, the “&” sign had entered common English usage as the 27th character of the alphabet.


  3. It didn’t take long before the “and per se and” officially appeared in English dictionaries as ampersand.


  4. The Scottish people called the word for the symbol “&” epershand, derived from the “et per se and” using the original Latin “et” to refer to the symbol when spoken, instead of the English, “and”.


–– Heather Sanders: "Twenty Interesting Things About…The Ampersand", April 10, 2015




Etymological




1837, contraction of and per se and, meaning "(the character) '&' by itself is 'and' " (a hybrid phrase, partly in Latin, partly in English). An earlier form of it was colloquial ampassy (1706). The distinction is to avoid confusion with & in such formations as &c., a once common way of writing etc. (the et in et cetera is Latin for "and"). The letters a, I, and o also formerly (15c.-16c.) were written a per se, etc., especially when standing alone as words.



In old schoolbooks the ampersand was printed at the end of the alphabet and thus by 1880s the word ampersand had acquired a slang sense of "posterior, rear end, hindquarters."




During the 19th century it then fell out of favour.



An early example




The name ampezant, occurring above in the same passage with ableselfa, is not the only evidence for a final t instead of the usual d of ampersand. Professor Joynes writes:




"As to ampersand, my recollection is quite distinct. In my day fifty years ago the sign & always stood at the end of the alphabet, and we recited it as a letter : x, y, z, ampersand. Yet I think we called it rather ampersant or ampersants, without the slightest idea (on the part of pupils or teacher) that it contained any trace of the word and. I was in childhood also familiar with the name izzard"




Mr. George H. Browne of Cambridge informs me that he used to hear his grandfather (a native and resident of Framingham, Mass.) say the alphabet ending in zed, ampsam. Mr. Browne is not quite sure, at this distance of time, what the vowel of the second syllable was; that of the first was œ. Still another form is eppershand, given in Samuel Ramsey's The English Language and English Grammar, New York, 1892, p. T04, 1 and well explained as et-per-se-and.
–– Harvard studies and notes in philology and literature, Vol 2,
by Harvard University; Harvard University. Division of Modern Languages, 1893. (archive.org)




With isolated holdouts persisting into the 20th century, the official statement on this seems to be:




ampersand, n.

Pronunciation: /æmpəˈsænd//ˈæmp-/



Corruption of ‘and per se—and’, the old way of spelling and naming the character &; i.e. ‘& by itself = and;’ found in various forms in almost all the dialect Glossaries. See A per se n., I per se, O per se, etc.



1837 T. C. Haliburton Clockmaker (1862) 399 He has hardly learned what Ampersand means, afore they give him a horse.

1859 ‘G. Eliot’ Adam Bede II. ii. xxi. 119 He thought it [sc.Z] had only been put there ‘to finish off th' alphabet, like, though ampus-and..would ha' done as well’.

1869 Punch 17 Apr. Of all the types in a printer's hand Commend me to the Amperzand.

1881 A. F. Parker Gloss. Words Oxfordshire ‘Amsiam, the sign &.’
1882 E. A. Freeman in Longman's Mag. 1 95 ‘Ampussy and,’ that is, in full ‘and per se, and,’ is the name of the sign for the conjunction and, &, which used to be printed at the end of the alphabet.







share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    According to my O.E.D. (1928), ampersand is more or less a Queen's English version of the older variants ampassy / ampussy / ampussy-and, attested from 1706 and still "common in dialects from Cumberland to Cornish". Al of course dialectical corruptions of "and-per-se" or "and-per-se and' as you note.

    – Pieter Geerkens
    6 hours ago







  • 1





    Recall also that the ampersand character itself is s stylized representation of the Latin "et"; hence the once common usage of "&c" as an alternative abbreviation for "et cetera" besides the now ubiquitous "etc.".

    – Pieter Geerkens
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @PieterGeerkens Yeah. And this &c I thought would lead me to a better more precise date, as the original meaning was somehow lost for many along the way at some time. Unfortunately, I lost the struggle against the databases for that one so far.

    – LangLangC
    3 hours ago











  • My money is on a Texas or California School Board vetoing "&" because "it's a glyph, but not a letter"; and the est of the U.S. and then English speaking world had to follow suit. Probably just prior to the First World War.

    – Pieter Geerkens
    3 hours ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f53546%2fwhen-did-stop-being-taught-alongside-the-alphabet%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














Ironically, it seems to coincide with the addition of the very word ampersand to the dictionaries. But the process took a while to complete and a precise date seems to be undeterminable, not in the least because it wasn't universally adopted ever. The character got its corrupted name around 1837 and from then on lost popularity so much that by the late 1800s it was already distant memory for most.



A real watershed for its use in alphabet learning early readers' books seems to be 1857:




Even as late as 1857, & was printed in some early-reader books as the 27th letter of the alphabet. And it is the ampersand’s status as a letter that gave it the name by which we know it today, a name that first appeared in English in about 1835.
–– Stephen Webb: "Clash of Symbols. A Ride Through the Riches of Glyphs", Springer: Cham, 2018.




If that is indeed 'the year', then the ampersand as twenty-seventh letter of the alphabet appeared in "My Own Primer, or First Lessons in Spelling and Reading" (1857) by Rev. John P. Carter.
(–– Keith Houston: "Shady Characters. The Secret Life of Punctuation, Symbols & Other Typographical Marks", W. W. Norton & Company: New York, London, 2013.)



During the whole time various editions of for example John Walker: "A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary, and Expositor of the English Language ...: To which are Prefixed, Principles of English Pronunciation ... : the Whole Interspersed with Observations, Etymological, Critical, and Grammatical… ",
Tomas Tegg, 1827( checked until 1882) contained discussions about whether the English alphabet contains 24 or 26 letters 'properly', but has the 'per se et' listed as additional info outside of the alphabet (example)




Not really implausible speculations and reasoning around that to be found at How and why has the ampersand been removed from the alphabet?




When Old English was discarded in favor of the modern English were are now familiar with, the ampersand maintained its status of “member of the alphabet” (to coin a phrase) to a degree, with some regions and dialects opting to include it until the mid-1800s.



Except that it was not yet called an ampersand. The & sign was, rather, referred to simply as “and” — which made reciting the alphabet awkward. As Dictionary.com notes, it was (and is) odd to say “X Y Z and.” So, they didn’t. Instead, our lexicon developed another saying: “X, Y, and Z, and by itself, ‘and'” — but instead of saying “by itself,” the Latin phrase per se came into favor. The result? “And per se, and,” or, muttered quickly by a disinterested student, “ampersand.”



Why the inclusion of the ampersand in the alphabet fell out of use is anyone’s guess, but there is a good chance that credit goes to the ABC song we are most all familiar with — that is, the one which shares its tune with Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star (and borrows from Mozart’s Ah vous dirai-je, Maman). That song was copyrighted in 1835, around the time that the ampersand started falling out of favor with the rest of the ABCs.
–– "And, the 27th Letter of the Alphabet", NowIKnow, 2011.




And




It all begins with the Little Folks learning their ABCs. In the 1830s the alphabet started incorporating the symbol “&” as the 27th letter. From the Dixie Primer for the Little Folks:




And




  1. In the early 1800s, school children reciting their ABCs concluded the alphabet with the “&”. Since it was awkward to say, “X,Y,Z, and,” students said, “and per se and.” Per se means “by itself,” so the students were basically saying, “X,Y,Z, and by itself and.”


  2. By 1837, the “&” sign had entered common English usage as the 27th character of the alphabet.


  3. It didn’t take long before the “and per se and” officially appeared in English dictionaries as ampersand.


  4. The Scottish people called the word for the symbol “&” epershand, derived from the “et per se and” using the original Latin “et” to refer to the symbol when spoken, instead of the English, “and”.


–– Heather Sanders: "Twenty Interesting Things About…The Ampersand", April 10, 2015




Etymological




1837, contraction of and per se and, meaning "(the character) '&' by itself is 'and' " (a hybrid phrase, partly in Latin, partly in English). An earlier form of it was colloquial ampassy (1706). The distinction is to avoid confusion with & in such formations as &c., a once common way of writing etc. (the et in et cetera is Latin for "and"). The letters a, I, and o also formerly (15c.-16c.) were written a per se, etc., especially when standing alone as words.



In old schoolbooks the ampersand was printed at the end of the alphabet and thus by 1880s the word ampersand had acquired a slang sense of "posterior, rear end, hindquarters."




During the 19th century it then fell out of favour.



An early example




The name ampezant, occurring above in the same passage with ableselfa, is not the only evidence for a final t instead of the usual d of ampersand. Professor Joynes writes:




"As to ampersand, my recollection is quite distinct. In my day fifty years ago the sign & always stood at the end of the alphabet, and we recited it as a letter : x, y, z, ampersand. Yet I think we called it rather ampersant or ampersants, without the slightest idea (on the part of pupils or teacher) that it contained any trace of the word and. I was in childhood also familiar with the name izzard"




Mr. George H. Browne of Cambridge informs me that he used to hear his grandfather (a native and resident of Framingham, Mass.) say the alphabet ending in zed, ampsam. Mr. Browne is not quite sure, at this distance of time, what the vowel of the second syllable was; that of the first was œ. Still another form is eppershand, given in Samuel Ramsey's The English Language and English Grammar, New York, 1892, p. T04, 1 and well explained as et-per-se-and.
–– Harvard studies and notes in philology and literature, Vol 2,
by Harvard University; Harvard University. Division of Modern Languages, 1893. (archive.org)




With isolated holdouts persisting into the 20th century, the official statement on this seems to be:




ampersand, n.

Pronunciation: /æmpəˈsænd//ˈæmp-/



Corruption of ‘and per se—and’, the old way of spelling and naming the character &; i.e. ‘& by itself = and;’ found in various forms in almost all the dialect Glossaries. See A per se n., I per se, O per se, etc.



1837 T. C. Haliburton Clockmaker (1862) 399 He has hardly learned what Ampersand means, afore they give him a horse.

1859 ‘G. Eliot’ Adam Bede II. ii. xxi. 119 He thought it [sc.Z] had only been put there ‘to finish off th' alphabet, like, though ampus-and..would ha' done as well’.

1869 Punch 17 Apr. Of all the types in a printer's hand Commend me to the Amperzand.

1881 A. F. Parker Gloss. Words Oxfordshire ‘Amsiam, the sign &.’
1882 E. A. Freeman in Longman's Mag. 1 95 ‘Ampussy and,’ that is, in full ‘and per se, and,’ is the name of the sign for the conjunction and, &, which used to be printed at the end of the alphabet.







share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    According to my O.E.D. (1928), ampersand is more or less a Queen's English version of the older variants ampassy / ampussy / ampussy-and, attested from 1706 and still "common in dialects from Cumberland to Cornish". Al of course dialectical corruptions of "and-per-se" or "and-per-se and' as you note.

    – Pieter Geerkens
    6 hours ago







  • 1





    Recall also that the ampersand character itself is s stylized representation of the Latin "et"; hence the once common usage of "&c" as an alternative abbreviation for "et cetera" besides the now ubiquitous "etc.".

    – Pieter Geerkens
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @PieterGeerkens Yeah. And this &c I thought would lead me to a better more precise date, as the original meaning was somehow lost for many along the way at some time. Unfortunately, I lost the struggle against the databases for that one so far.

    – LangLangC
    3 hours ago











  • My money is on a Texas or California School Board vetoing "&" because "it's a glyph, but not a letter"; and the est of the U.S. and then English speaking world had to follow suit. Probably just prior to the First World War.

    – Pieter Geerkens
    3 hours ago















5














Ironically, it seems to coincide with the addition of the very word ampersand to the dictionaries. But the process took a while to complete and a precise date seems to be undeterminable, not in the least because it wasn't universally adopted ever. The character got its corrupted name around 1837 and from then on lost popularity so much that by the late 1800s it was already distant memory for most.



A real watershed for its use in alphabet learning early readers' books seems to be 1857:




Even as late as 1857, & was printed in some early-reader books as the 27th letter of the alphabet. And it is the ampersand’s status as a letter that gave it the name by which we know it today, a name that first appeared in English in about 1835.
–– Stephen Webb: "Clash of Symbols. A Ride Through the Riches of Glyphs", Springer: Cham, 2018.




If that is indeed 'the year', then the ampersand as twenty-seventh letter of the alphabet appeared in "My Own Primer, or First Lessons in Spelling and Reading" (1857) by Rev. John P. Carter.
(–– Keith Houston: "Shady Characters. The Secret Life of Punctuation, Symbols & Other Typographical Marks", W. W. Norton & Company: New York, London, 2013.)



During the whole time various editions of for example John Walker: "A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary, and Expositor of the English Language ...: To which are Prefixed, Principles of English Pronunciation ... : the Whole Interspersed with Observations, Etymological, Critical, and Grammatical… ",
Tomas Tegg, 1827( checked until 1882) contained discussions about whether the English alphabet contains 24 or 26 letters 'properly', but has the 'per se et' listed as additional info outside of the alphabet (example)




Not really implausible speculations and reasoning around that to be found at How and why has the ampersand been removed from the alphabet?




When Old English was discarded in favor of the modern English were are now familiar with, the ampersand maintained its status of “member of the alphabet” (to coin a phrase) to a degree, with some regions and dialects opting to include it until the mid-1800s.



Except that it was not yet called an ampersand. The & sign was, rather, referred to simply as “and” — which made reciting the alphabet awkward. As Dictionary.com notes, it was (and is) odd to say “X Y Z and.” So, they didn’t. Instead, our lexicon developed another saying: “X, Y, and Z, and by itself, ‘and'” — but instead of saying “by itself,” the Latin phrase per se came into favor. The result? “And per se, and,” or, muttered quickly by a disinterested student, “ampersand.”



Why the inclusion of the ampersand in the alphabet fell out of use is anyone’s guess, but there is a good chance that credit goes to the ABC song we are most all familiar with — that is, the one which shares its tune with Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star (and borrows from Mozart’s Ah vous dirai-je, Maman). That song was copyrighted in 1835, around the time that the ampersand started falling out of favor with the rest of the ABCs.
–– "And, the 27th Letter of the Alphabet", NowIKnow, 2011.




And




It all begins with the Little Folks learning their ABCs. In the 1830s the alphabet started incorporating the symbol “&” as the 27th letter. From the Dixie Primer for the Little Folks:




And




  1. In the early 1800s, school children reciting their ABCs concluded the alphabet with the “&”. Since it was awkward to say, “X,Y,Z, and,” students said, “and per se and.” Per se means “by itself,” so the students were basically saying, “X,Y,Z, and by itself and.”


  2. By 1837, the “&” sign had entered common English usage as the 27th character of the alphabet.


  3. It didn’t take long before the “and per se and” officially appeared in English dictionaries as ampersand.


  4. The Scottish people called the word for the symbol “&” epershand, derived from the “et per se and” using the original Latin “et” to refer to the symbol when spoken, instead of the English, “and”.


–– Heather Sanders: "Twenty Interesting Things About…The Ampersand", April 10, 2015




Etymological




1837, contraction of and per se and, meaning "(the character) '&' by itself is 'and' " (a hybrid phrase, partly in Latin, partly in English). An earlier form of it was colloquial ampassy (1706). The distinction is to avoid confusion with & in such formations as &c., a once common way of writing etc. (the et in et cetera is Latin for "and"). The letters a, I, and o also formerly (15c.-16c.) were written a per se, etc., especially when standing alone as words.



In old schoolbooks the ampersand was printed at the end of the alphabet and thus by 1880s the word ampersand had acquired a slang sense of "posterior, rear end, hindquarters."




During the 19th century it then fell out of favour.



An early example




The name ampezant, occurring above in the same passage with ableselfa, is not the only evidence for a final t instead of the usual d of ampersand. Professor Joynes writes:




"As to ampersand, my recollection is quite distinct. In my day fifty years ago the sign & always stood at the end of the alphabet, and we recited it as a letter : x, y, z, ampersand. Yet I think we called it rather ampersant or ampersants, without the slightest idea (on the part of pupils or teacher) that it contained any trace of the word and. I was in childhood also familiar with the name izzard"




Mr. George H. Browne of Cambridge informs me that he used to hear his grandfather (a native and resident of Framingham, Mass.) say the alphabet ending in zed, ampsam. Mr. Browne is not quite sure, at this distance of time, what the vowel of the second syllable was; that of the first was œ. Still another form is eppershand, given in Samuel Ramsey's The English Language and English Grammar, New York, 1892, p. T04, 1 and well explained as et-per-se-and.
–– Harvard studies and notes in philology and literature, Vol 2,
by Harvard University; Harvard University. Division of Modern Languages, 1893. (archive.org)




With isolated holdouts persisting into the 20th century, the official statement on this seems to be:




ampersand, n.

Pronunciation: /æmpəˈsænd//ˈæmp-/



Corruption of ‘and per se—and’, the old way of spelling and naming the character &; i.e. ‘& by itself = and;’ found in various forms in almost all the dialect Glossaries. See A per se n., I per se, O per se, etc.



1837 T. C. Haliburton Clockmaker (1862) 399 He has hardly learned what Ampersand means, afore they give him a horse.

1859 ‘G. Eliot’ Adam Bede II. ii. xxi. 119 He thought it [sc.Z] had only been put there ‘to finish off th' alphabet, like, though ampus-and..would ha' done as well’.

1869 Punch 17 Apr. Of all the types in a printer's hand Commend me to the Amperzand.

1881 A. F. Parker Gloss. Words Oxfordshire ‘Amsiam, the sign &.’
1882 E. A. Freeman in Longman's Mag. 1 95 ‘Ampussy and,’ that is, in full ‘and per se, and,’ is the name of the sign for the conjunction and, &, which used to be printed at the end of the alphabet.







share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    According to my O.E.D. (1928), ampersand is more or less a Queen's English version of the older variants ampassy / ampussy / ampussy-and, attested from 1706 and still "common in dialects from Cumberland to Cornish". Al of course dialectical corruptions of "and-per-se" or "and-per-se and' as you note.

    – Pieter Geerkens
    6 hours ago







  • 1





    Recall also that the ampersand character itself is s stylized representation of the Latin "et"; hence the once common usage of "&c" as an alternative abbreviation for "et cetera" besides the now ubiquitous "etc.".

    – Pieter Geerkens
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @PieterGeerkens Yeah. And this &c I thought would lead me to a better more precise date, as the original meaning was somehow lost for many along the way at some time. Unfortunately, I lost the struggle against the databases for that one so far.

    – LangLangC
    3 hours ago











  • My money is on a Texas or California School Board vetoing "&" because "it's a glyph, but not a letter"; and the est of the U.S. and then English speaking world had to follow suit. Probably just prior to the First World War.

    – Pieter Geerkens
    3 hours ago













5












5








5







Ironically, it seems to coincide with the addition of the very word ampersand to the dictionaries. But the process took a while to complete and a precise date seems to be undeterminable, not in the least because it wasn't universally adopted ever. The character got its corrupted name around 1837 and from then on lost popularity so much that by the late 1800s it was already distant memory for most.



A real watershed for its use in alphabet learning early readers' books seems to be 1857:




Even as late as 1857, & was printed in some early-reader books as the 27th letter of the alphabet. And it is the ampersand’s status as a letter that gave it the name by which we know it today, a name that first appeared in English in about 1835.
–– Stephen Webb: "Clash of Symbols. A Ride Through the Riches of Glyphs", Springer: Cham, 2018.




If that is indeed 'the year', then the ampersand as twenty-seventh letter of the alphabet appeared in "My Own Primer, or First Lessons in Spelling and Reading" (1857) by Rev. John P. Carter.
(–– Keith Houston: "Shady Characters. The Secret Life of Punctuation, Symbols & Other Typographical Marks", W. W. Norton & Company: New York, London, 2013.)



During the whole time various editions of for example John Walker: "A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary, and Expositor of the English Language ...: To which are Prefixed, Principles of English Pronunciation ... : the Whole Interspersed with Observations, Etymological, Critical, and Grammatical… ",
Tomas Tegg, 1827( checked until 1882) contained discussions about whether the English alphabet contains 24 or 26 letters 'properly', but has the 'per se et' listed as additional info outside of the alphabet (example)




Not really implausible speculations and reasoning around that to be found at How and why has the ampersand been removed from the alphabet?




When Old English was discarded in favor of the modern English were are now familiar with, the ampersand maintained its status of “member of the alphabet” (to coin a phrase) to a degree, with some regions and dialects opting to include it until the mid-1800s.



Except that it was not yet called an ampersand. The & sign was, rather, referred to simply as “and” — which made reciting the alphabet awkward. As Dictionary.com notes, it was (and is) odd to say “X Y Z and.” So, they didn’t. Instead, our lexicon developed another saying: “X, Y, and Z, and by itself, ‘and'” — but instead of saying “by itself,” the Latin phrase per se came into favor. The result? “And per se, and,” or, muttered quickly by a disinterested student, “ampersand.”



Why the inclusion of the ampersand in the alphabet fell out of use is anyone’s guess, but there is a good chance that credit goes to the ABC song we are most all familiar with — that is, the one which shares its tune with Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star (and borrows from Mozart’s Ah vous dirai-je, Maman). That song was copyrighted in 1835, around the time that the ampersand started falling out of favor with the rest of the ABCs.
–– "And, the 27th Letter of the Alphabet", NowIKnow, 2011.




And




It all begins with the Little Folks learning their ABCs. In the 1830s the alphabet started incorporating the symbol “&” as the 27th letter. From the Dixie Primer for the Little Folks:




And




  1. In the early 1800s, school children reciting their ABCs concluded the alphabet with the “&”. Since it was awkward to say, “X,Y,Z, and,” students said, “and per se and.” Per se means “by itself,” so the students were basically saying, “X,Y,Z, and by itself and.”


  2. By 1837, the “&” sign had entered common English usage as the 27th character of the alphabet.


  3. It didn’t take long before the “and per se and” officially appeared in English dictionaries as ampersand.


  4. The Scottish people called the word for the symbol “&” epershand, derived from the “et per se and” using the original Latin “et” to refer to the symbol when spoken, instead of the English, “and”.


–– Heather Sanders: "Twenty Interesting Things About…The Ampersand", April 10, 2015




Etymological




1837, contraction of and per se and, meaning "(the character) '&' by itself is 'and' " (a hybrid phrase, partly in Latin, partly in English). An earlier form of it was colloquial ampassy (1706). The distinction is to avoid confusion with & in such formations as &c., a once common way of writing etc. (the et in et cetera is Latin for "and"). The letters a, I, and o also formerly (15c.-16c.) were written a per se, etc., especially when standing alone as words.



In old schoolbooks the ampersand was printed at the end of the alphabet and thus by 1880s the word ampersand had acquired a slang sense of "posterior, rear end, hindquarters."




During the 19th century it then fell out of favour.



An early example




The name ampezant, occurring above in the same passage with ableselfa, is not the only evidence for a final t instead of the usual d of ampersand. Professor Joynes writes:




"As to ampersand, my recollection is quite distinct. In my day fifty years ago the sign & always stood at the end of the alphabet, and we recited it as a letter : x, y, z, ampersand. Yet I think we called it rather ampersant or ampersants, without the slightest idea (on the part of pupils or teacher) that it contained any trace of the word and. I was in childhood also familiar with the name izzard"




Mr. George H. Browne of Cambridge informs me that he used to hear his grandfather (a native and resident of Framingham, Mass.) say the alphabet ending in zed, ampsam. Mr. Browne is not quite sure, at this distance of time, what the vowel of the second syllable was; that of the first was œ. Still another form is eppershand, given in Samuel Ramsey's The English Language and English Grammar, New York, 1892, p. T04, 1 and well explained as et-per-se-and.
–– Harvard studies and notes in philology and literature, Vol 2,
by Harvard University; Harvard University. Division of Modern Languages, 1893. (archive.org)




With isolated holdouts persisting into the 20th century, the official statement on this seems to be:




ampersand, n.

Pronunciation: /æmpəˈsænd//ˈæmp-/



Corruption of ‘and per se—and’, the old way of spelling and naming the character &; i.e. ‘& by itself = and;’ found in various forms in almost all the dialect Glossaries. See A per se n., I per se, O per se, etc.



1837 T. C. Haliburton Clockmaker (1862) 399 He has hardly learned what Ampersand means, afore they give him a horse.

1859 ‘G. Eliot’ Adam Bede II. ii. xxi. 119 He thought it [sc.Z] had only been put there ‘to finish off th' alphabet, like, though ampus-and..would ha' done as well’.

1869 Punch 17 Apr. Of all the types in a printer's hand Commend me to the Amperzand.

1881 A. F. Parker Gloss. Words Oxfordshire ‘Amsiam, the sign &.’
1882 E. A. Freeman in Longman's Mag. 1 95 ‘Ampussy and,’ that is, in full ‘and per se, and,’ is the name of the sign for the conjunction and, &, which used to be printed at the end of the alphabet.







share|improve this answer















Ironically, it seems to coincide with the addition of the very word ampersand to the dictionaries. But the process took a while to complete and a precise date seems to be undeterminable, not in the least because it wasn't universally adopted ever. The character got its corrupted name around 1837 and from then on lost popularity so much that by the late 1800s it was already distant memory for most.



A real watershed for its use in alphabet learning early readers' books seems to be 1857:




Even as late as 1857, & was printed in some early-reader books as the 27th letter of the alphabet. And it is the ampersand’s status as a letter that gave it the name by which we know it today, a name that first appeared in English in about 1835.
–– Stephen Webb: "Clash of Symbols. A Ride Through the Riches of Glyphs", Springer: Cham, 2018.




If that is indeed 'the year', then the ampersand as twenty-seventh letter of the alphabet appeared in "My Own Primer, or First Lessons in Spelling and Reading" (1857) by Rev. John P. Carter.
(–– Keith Houston: "Shady Characters. The Secret Life of Punctuation, Symbols & Other Typographical Marks", W. W. Norton & Company: New York, London, 2013.)



During the whole time various editions of for example John Walker: "A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary, and Expositor of the English Language ...: To which are Prefixed, Principles of English Pronunciation ... : the Whole Interspersed with Observations, Etymological, Critical, and Grammatical… ",
Tomas Tegg, 1827( checked until 1882) contained discussions about whether the English alphabet contains 24 or 26 letters 'properly', but has the 'per se et' listed as additional info outside of the alphabet (example)




Not really implausible speculations and reasoning around that to be found at How and why has the ampersand been removed from the alphabet?




When Old English was discarded in favor of the modern English were are now familiar with, the ampersand maintained its status of “member of the alphabet” (to coin a phrase) to a degree, with some regions and dialects opting to include it until the mid-1800s.



Except that it was not yet called an ampersand. The & sign was, rather, referred to simply as “and” — which made reciting the alphabet awkward. As Dictionary.com notes, it was (and is) odd to say “X Y Z and.” So, they didn’t. Instead, our lexicon developed another saying: “X, Y, and Z, and by itself, ‘and'” — but instead of saying “by itself,” the Latin phrase per se came into favor. The result? “And per se, and,” or, muttered quickly by a disinterested student, “ampersand.”



Why the inclusion of the ampersand in the alphabet fell out of use is anyone’s guess, but there is a good chance that credit goes to the ABC song we are most all familiar with — that is, the one which shares its tune with Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star (and borrows from Mozart’s Ah vous dirai-je, Maman). That song was copyrighted in 1835, around the time that the ampersand started falling out of favor with the rest of the ABCs.
–– "And, the 27th Letter of the Alphabet", NowIKnow, 2011.




And




It all begins with the Little Folks learning their ABCs. In the 1830s the alphabet started incorporating the symbol “&” as the 27th letter. From the Dixie Primer for the Little Folks:




And




  1. In the early 1800s, school children reciting their ABCs concluded the alphabet with the “&”. Since it was awkward to say, “X,Y,Z, and,” students said, “and per se and.” Per se means “by itself,” so the students were basically saying, “X,Y,Z, and by itself and.”


  2. By 1837, the “&” sign had entered common English usage as the 27th character of the alphabet.


  3. It didn’t take long before the “and per se and” officially appeared in English dictionaries as ampersand.


  4. The Scottish people called the word for the symbol “&” epershand, derived from the “et per se and” using the original Latin “et” to refer to the symbol when spoken, instead of the English, “and”.


–– Heather Sanders: "Twenty Interesting Things About…The Ampersand", April 10, 2015




Etymological




1837, contraction of and per se and, meaning "(the character) '&' by itself is 'and' " (a hybrid phrase, partly in Latin, partly in English). An earlier form of it was colloquial ampassy (1706). The distinction is to avoid confusion with & in such formations as &c., a once common way of writing etc. (the et in et cetera is Latin for "and"). The letters a, I, and o also formerly (15c.-16c.) were written a per se, etc., especially when standing alone as words.



In old schoolbooks the ampersand was printed at the end of the alphabet and thus by 1880s the word ampersand had acquired a slang sense of "posterior, rear end, hindquarters."




During the 19th century it then fell out of favour.



An early example




The name ampezant, occurring above in the same passage with ableselfa, is not the only evidence for a final t instead of the usual d of ampersand. Professor Joynes writes:




"As to ampersand, my recollection is quite distinct. In my day fifty years ago the sign & always stood at the end of the alphabet, and we recited it as a letter : x, y, z, ampersand. Yet I think we called it rather ampersant or ampersants, without the slightest idea (on the part of pupils or teacher) that it contained any trace of the word and. I was in childhood also familiar with the name izzard"




Mr. George H. Browne of Cambridge informs me that he used to hear his grandfather (a native and resident of Framingham, Mass.) say the alphabet ending in zed, ampsam. Mr. Browne is not quite sure, at this distance of time, what the vowel of the second syllable was; that of the first was œ. Still another form is eppershand, given in Samuel Ramsey's The English Language and English Grammar, New York, 1892, p. T04, 1 and well explained as et-per-se-and.
–– Harvard studies and notes in philology and literature, Vol 2,
by Harvard University; Harvard University. Division of Modern Languages, 1893. (archive.org)




With isolated holdouts persisting into the 20th century, the official statement on this seems to be:




ampersand, n.

Pronunciation: /æmpəˈsænd//ˈæmp-/



Corruption of ‘and per se—and’, the old way of spelling and naming the character &; i.e. ‘& by itself = and;’ found in various forms in almost all the dialect Glossaries. See A per se n., I per se, O per se, etc.



1837 T. C. Haliburton Clockmaker (1862) 399 He has hardly learned what Ampersand means, afore they give him a horse.

1859 ‘G. Eliot’ Adam Bede II. ii. xxi. 119 He thought it [sc.Z] had only been put there ‘to finish off th' alphabet, like, though ampus-and..would ha' done as well’.

1869 Punch 17 Apr. Of all the types in a printer's hand Commend me to the Amperzand.

1881 A. F. Parker Gloss. Words Oxfordshire ‘Amsiam, the sign &.’
1882 E. A. Freeman in Longman's Mag. 1 95 ‘Ampussy and,’ that is, in full ‘and per se, and,’ is the name of the sign for the conjunction and, &, which used to be printed at the end of the alphabet.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 5 hours ago

























answered 6 hours ago









LangLangCLangLangC

32.8k5 gold badges103 silver badges162 bronze badges




32.8k5 gold badges103 silver badges162 bronze badges







  • 1





    According to my O.E.D. (1928), ampersand is more or less a Queen's English version of the older variants ampassy / ampussy / ampussy-and, attested from 1706 and still "common in dialects from Cumberland to Cornish". Al of course dialectical corruptions of "and-per-se" or "and-per-se and' as you note.

    – Pieter Geerkens
    6 hours ago







  • 1





    Recall also that the ampersand character itself is s stylized representation of the Latin "et"; hence the once common usage of "&c" as an alternative abbreviation for "et cetera" besides the now ubiquitous "etc.".

    – Pieter Geerkens
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @PieterGeerkens Yeah. And this &c I thought would lead me to a better more precise date, as the original meaning was somehow lost for many along the way at some time. Unfortunately, I lost the struggle against the databases for that one so far.

    – LangLangC
    3 hours ago











  • My money is on a Texas or California School Board vetoing "&" because "it's a glyph, but not a letter"; and the est of the U.S. and then English speaking world had to follow suit. Probably just prior to the First World War.

    – Pieter Geerkens
    3 hours ago












  • 1





    According to my O.E.D. (1928), ampersand is more or less a Queen's English version of the older variants ampassy / ampussy / ampussy-and, attested from 1706 and still "common in dialects from Cumberland to Cornish". Al of course dialectical corruptions of "and-per-se" or "and-per-se and' as you note.

    – Pieter Geerkens
    6 hours ago







  • 1





    Recall also that the ampersand character itself is s stylized representation of the Latin "et"; hence the once common usage of "&c" as an alternative abbreviation for "et cetera" besides the now ubiquitous "etc.".

    – Pieter Geerkens
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @PieterGeerkens Yeah. And this &c I thought would lead me to a better more precise date, as the original meaning was somehow lost for many along the way at some time. Unfortunately, I lost the struggle against the databases for that one so far.

    – LangLangC
    3 hours ago











  • My money is on a Texas or California School Board vetoing "&" because "it's a glyph, but not a letter"; and the est of the U.S. and then English speaking world had to follow suit. Probably just prior to the First World War.

    – Pieter Geerkens
    3 hours ago







1




1





According to my O.E.D. (1928), ampersand is more or less a Queen's English version of the older variants ampassy / ampussy / ampussy-and, attested from 1706 and still "common in dialects from Cumberland to Cornish". Al of course dialectical corruptions of "and-per-se" or "and-per-se and' as you note.

– Pieter Geerkens
6 hours ago






According to my O.E.D. (1928), ampersand is more or less a Queen's English version of the older variants ampassy / ampussy / ampussy-and, attested from 1706 and still "common in dialects from Cumberland to Cornish". Al of course dialectical corruptions of "and-per-se" or "and-per-se and' as you note.

– Pieter Geerkens
6 hours ago





1




1





Recall also that the ampersand character itself is s stylized representation of the Latin "et"; hence the once common usage of "&c" as an alternative abbreviation for "et cetera" besides the now ubiquitous "etc.".

– Pieter Geerkens
3 hours ago





Recall also that the ampersand character itself is s stylized representation of the Latin "et"; hence the once common usage of "&c" as an alternative abbreviation for "et cetera" besides the now ubiquitous "etc.".

– Pieter Geerkens
3 hours ago




1




1





@PieterGeerkens Yeah. And this &c I thought would lead me to a better more precise date, as the original meaning was somehow lost for many along the way at some time. Unfortunately, I lost the struggle against the databases for that one so far.

– LangLangC
3 hours ago





@PieterGeerkens Yeah. And this &c I thought would lead me to a better more precise date, as the original meaning was somehow lost for many along the way at some time. Unfortunately, I lost the struggle against the databases for that one so far.

– LangLangC
3 hours ago













My money is on a Texas or California School Board vetoing "&" because "it's a glyph, but not a letter"; and the est of the U.S. and then English speaking world had to follow suit. Probably just prior to the First World War.

– Pieter Geerkens
3 hours ago





My money is on a Texas or California School Board vetoing "&" because "it's a glyph, but not a letter"; and the est of the U.S. and then English speaking world had to follow suit. Probably just prior to the First World War.

– Pieter Geerkens
3 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f53546%2fwhen-did-stop-being-taught-alongside-the-alphabet%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її