How can religions be structured in ways that allow inter-faith councils to work?How can a god convince a civilization that he doesn't exist?How can I convince members of peaceful religions to start a holy war?How can there be different religions in a world where gods have been proven to exist?Halloween: How can werewolf work in US?How can a superpowered being avoid religions being created around itself?Why would a priesthood of a world religion worship a different god from their followers?How can an pantheist council serve as an umbrella for various religious institutions?How can I ensure that Roman state religion dominates christianity?How can I define good in a religion that claims no moral authority?How can religions without a hell discourage evil-doing?

Why force the nose of 737 Max down in the first place?

Why is drive/partition number still used?

How to apply the changes to my `.zshrc` file after edit?

Character is called by their first initial. How do I write it?

If my pay period is split between 2 calendar years, which tax year do I file them in?

Is it legal to use cash pulled from a credit card to pay the monthly payment on that credit card?

Decreasing star size

How to check what is edible on an alien world?

How to kill my goat in Goat Simulator

How many oliphaunts died in all of the Lord of the Rings battles?

Why is 'n' preferred over "n" for output streams?

How do I stop my characters falling in love?

Unethical behavior : should I report it?

Why can't my huge trees be chopped down?

How can I rectify up to 85 kV

How to avoid theft of intellectual property when trying to obtain a Ph.D?

Why do all my history books divide Chinese history after the Han dynasty?

What is this spacecraft tethered to another spacecraft in LEO (vintage)

Aftermath of nuclear disaster at Three Mile Island

How to tar a list of directories only if they exist

Writing a clean implementation of Rock, Paper, Scissors game in C++

Trapped in an ocean Temple in Minecraft?

May a man marry the women with whom he committed adultery?

Use cases for M-0 & C-0?



How can religions be structured in ways that allow inter-faith councils to work?


How can a god convince a civilization that he doesn't exist?How can I convince members of peaceful religions to start a holy war?How can there be different religions in a world where gods have been proven to exist?Halloween: How can werewolf work in US?How can a superpowered being avoid religions being created around itself?Why would a priesthood of a world religion worship a different god from their followers?How can an pantheist council serve as an umbrella for various religious institutions?How can I ensure that Roman state religion dominates christianity?How can I define good in a religion that claims no moral authority?How can religions without a hell discourage evil-doing?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


The people of this world worship what is called "The faith of the seven". These gods represent different aspects of creation. They are:



  1. Khorne: god of war

  2. Tzenteech: god of change/ambition

  3. Nurgle: god of life/fertility

  4. Slaneesh: god of pleasure

  5. Nagash: god of death

  6. Sigmar: god of order

  7. The Star Child: god of machinery

These seven gods are ruled over by a higher god that doesn't interact with creation. He created the seven to interact with humans and govern the human world in his stead. Each nation worships this faith differently. Some worship each god equally, while others worship one above all others as more relevant, but pay homage to their existence in some way.



A large council made up of Representatives from all faiths keeps the peace between nations, irrespective of how they worship this religion. As a result, there have been no major wars between countries that attempt to slaughter unbelievers and convert survivors to their version. This council have locations in every nation which are interconnected through a system of portals. These provide instantaneous travel between locations that only members of this council can use.



In our world, the Abraham religions have had a complicated history with each other, despite them originating from the same god. Even sects within the same faiths have had conflict over minor details or interpretations, accusing each other of heresy and whatnot.



What would religions need to allow for interfaith councils like this to be successful?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    How does this council work ? Voting mechanism is what ? Is there a casting vote system if there's a tie ? Is there a veto system ? You might compare this with the UN Security Council to see just how easy it is to neuter such a system, as the key members have all done from time to time.
    $endgroup$
    – StephenG
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If you are trying to avoid conflict between the nations, remove Khorne from the pantheon. Replace him with a god of self-sacrifice to offset Slaneesh's hedonistic teachings. You might also want to make the Star Child an offspring of Tzenteech and Sigmar, uniting those two initially opposing deities to demonstrate the value of cooperation. Nurgle and Nagash could be twins or married, always portrayed together. If you want to build a unified panteon, start with apparent opposites and then bring them together through their mythology.
    $endgroup$
    – Henry Taylor
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This isn't interfaith. As o.m. points out in an answer, you're talking about one religion with multiple Gods. Think Hinduism, where many deities are quite regional and not worshipped outside small(ish) areas, but are still part of the whole.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    6 hours ago

















3












$begingroup$


The people of this world worship what is called "The faith of the seven". These gods represent different aspects of creation. They are:



  1. Khorne: god of war

  2. Tzenteech: god of change/ambition

  3. Nurgle: god of life/fertility

  4. Slaneesh: god of pleasure

  5. Nagash: god of death

  6. Sigmar: god of order

  7. The Star Child: god of machinery

These seven gods are ruled over by a higher god that doesn't interact with creation. He created the seven to interact with humans and govern the human world in his stead. Each nation worships this faith differently. Some worship each god equally, while others worship one above all others as more relevant, but pay homage to their existence in some way.



A large council made up of Representatives from all faiths keeps the peace between nations, irrespective of how they worship this religion. As a result, there have been no major wars between countries that attempt to slaughter unbelievers and convert survivors to their version. This council have locations in every nation which are interconnected through a system of portals. These provide instantaneous travel between locations that only members of this council can use.



In our world, the Abraham religions have had a complicated history with each other, despite them originating from the same god. Even sects within the same faiths have had conflict over minor details or interpretations, accusing each other of heresy and whatnot.



What would religions need to allow for interfaith councils like this to be successful?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    How does this council work ? Voting mechanism is what ? Is there a casting vote system if there's a tie ? Is there a veto system ? You might compare this with the UN Security Council to see just how easy it is to neuter such a system, as the key members have all done from time to time.
    $endgroup$
    – StephenG
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If you are trying to avoid conflict between the nations, remove Khorne from the pantheon. Replace him with a god of self-sacrifice to offset Slaneesh's hedonistic teachings. You might also want to make the Star Child an offspring of Tzenteech and Sigmar, uniting those two initially opposing deities to demonstrate the value of cooperation. Nurgle and Nagash could be twins or married, always portrayed together. If you want to build a unified panteon, start with apparent opposites and then bring them together through their mythology.
    $endgroup$
    – Henry Taylor
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This isn't interfaith. As o.m. points out in an answer, you're talking about one religion with multiple Gods. Think Hinduism, where many deities are quite regional and not worshipped outside small(ish) areas, but are still part of the whole.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    6 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$


The people of this world worship what is called "The faith of the seven". These gods represent different aspects of creation. They are:



  1. Khorne: god of war

  2. Tzenteech: god of change/ambition

  3. Nurgle: god of life/fertility

  4. Slaneesh: god of pleasure

  5. Nagash: god of death

  6. Sigmar: god of order

  7. The Star Child: god of machinery

These seven gods are ruled over by a higher god that doesn't interact with creation. He created the seven to interact with humans and govern the human world in his stead. Each nation worships this faith differently. Some worship each god equally, while others worship one above all others as more relevant, but pay homage to their existence in some way.



A large council made up of Representatives from all faiths keeps the peace between nations, irrespective of how they worship this religion. As a result, there have been no major wars between countries that attempt to slaughter unbelievers and convert survivors to their version. This council have locations in every nation which are interconnected through a system of portals. These provide instantaneous travel between locations that only members of this council can use.



In our world, the Abraham religions have had a complicated history with each other, despite them originating from the same god. Even sects within the same faiths have had conflict over minor details or interpretations, accusing each other of heresy and whatnot.



What would religions need to allow for interfaith councils like this to be successful?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The people of this world worship what is called "The faith of the seven". These gods represent different aspects of creation. They are:



  1. Khorne: god of war

  2. Tzenteech: god of change/ambition

  3. Nurgle: god of life/fertility

  4. Slaneesh: god of pleasure

  5. Nagash: god of death

  6. Sigmar: god of order

  7. The Star Child: god of machinery

These seven gods are ruled over by a higher god that doesn't interact with creation. He created the seven to interact with humans and govern the human world in his stead. Each nation worships this faith differently. Some worship each god equally, while others worship one above all others as more relevant, but pay homage to their existence in some way.



A large council made up of Representatives from all faiths keeps the peace between nations, irrespective of how they worship this religion. As a result, there have been no major wars between countries that attempt to slaughter unbelievers and convert survivors to their version. This council have locations in every nation which are interconnected through a system of portals. These provide instantaneous travel between locations that only members of this council can use.



In our world, the Abraham religions have had a complicated history with each other, despite them originating from the same god. Even sects within the same faiths have had conflict over minor details or interpretations, accusing each other of heresy and whatnot.



What would religions need to allow for interfaith councils like this to be successful?







society religion






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 39 mins ago









kingledion

77.4k26 gold badges256 silver badges451 bronze badges




77.4k26 gold badges256 silver badges451 bronze badges










asked 8 hours ago









IncognitoIncognito

9,7239 gold badges81 silver badges143 bronze badges




9,7239 gold badges81 silver badges143 bronze badges











  • $begingroup$
    How does this council work ? Voting mechanism is what ? Is there a casting vote system if there's a tie ? Is there a veto system ? You might compare this with the UN Security Council to see just how easy it is to neuter such a system, as the key members have all done from time to time.
    $endgroup$
    – StephenG
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If you are trying to avoid conflict between the nations, remove Khorne from the pantheon. Replace him with a god of self-sacrifice to offset Slaneesh's hedonistic teachings. You might also want to make the Star Child an offspring of Tzenteech and Sigmar, uniting those two initially opposing deities to demonstrate the value of cooperation. Nurgle and Nagash could be twins or married, always portrayed together. If you want to build a unified panteon, start with apparent opposites and then bring them together through their mythology.
    $endgroup$
    – Henry Taylor
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This isn't interfaith. As o.m. points out in an answer, you're talking about one religion with multiple Gods. Think Hinduism, where many deities are quite regional and not worshipped outside small(ish) areas, but are still part of the whole.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    6 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    How does this council work ? Voting mechanism is what ? Is there a casting vote system if there's a tie ? Is there a veto system ? You might compare this with the UN Security Council to see just how easy it is to neuter such a system, as the key members have all done from time to time.
    $endgroup$
    – StephenG
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If you are trying to avoid conflict between the nations, remove Khorne from the pantheon. Replace him with a god of self-sacrifice to offset Slaneesh's hedonistic teachings. You might also want to make the Star Child an offspring of Tzenteech and Sigmar, uniting those two initially opposing deities to demonstrate the value of cooperation. Nurgle and Nagash could be twins or married, always portrayed together. If you want to build a unified panteon, start with apparent opposites and then bring them together through their mythology.
    $endgroup$
    – Henry Taylor
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This isn't interfaith. As o.m. points out in an answer, you're talking about one religion with multiple Gods. Think Hinduism, where many deities are quite regional and not worshipped outside small(ish) areas, but are still part of the whole.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    6 hours ago















$begingroup$
How does this council work ? Voting mechanism is what ? Is there a casting vote system if there's a tie ? Is there a veto system ? You might compare this with the UN Security Council to see just how easy it is to neuter such a system, as the key members have all done from time to time.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
How does this council work ? Voting mechanism is what ? Is there a casting vote system if there's a tie ? Is there a veto system ? You might compare this with the UN Security Council to see just how easy it is to neuter such a system, as the key members have all done from time to time.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
If you are trying to avoid conflict between the nations, remove Khorne from the pantheon. Replace him with a god of self-sacrifice to offset Slaneesh's hedonistic teachings. You might also want to make the Star Child an offspring of Tzenteech and Sigmar, uniting those two initially opposing deities to demonstrate the value of cooperation. Nurgle and Nagash could be twins or married, always portrayed together. If you want to build a unified panteon, start with apparent opposites and then bring them together through their mythology.
$endgroup$
– Henry Taylor
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
If you are trying to avoid conflict between the nations, remove Khorne from the pantheon. Replace him with a god of self-sacrifice to offset Slaneesh's hedonistic teachings. You might also want to make the Star Child an offspring of Tzenteech and Sigmar, uniting those two initially opposing deities to demonstrate the value of cooperation. Nurgle and Nagash could be twins or married, always portrayed together. If you want to build a unified panteon, start with apparent opposites and then bring them together through their mythology.
$endgroup$
– Henry Taylor
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
This isn't interfaith. As o.m. points out in an answer, you're talking about one religion with multiple Gods. Think Hinduism, where many deities are quite regional and not worshipped outside small(ish) areas, but are still part of the whole.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
This isn't interfaith. As o.m. points out in an answer, you're talking about one religion with multiple Gods. Think Hinduism, where many deities are quite regional and not worshipped outside small(ish) areas, but are still part of the whole.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
6 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

What you describe are not different religions, they are different cults within one pantheistic religion.



  • Have all cults within the religion acknowledge the existence and necessity of the entire pantheon. Individuals can still decide to worship Khorne or Nagash, or even try to make their cult more prominent in society, but attacking other cults would be disrespect to a "relative of the boss." Bad idea ...

  • Make representatives of all cults necessary for the most holy rites of each individual cult. On this day, we have come together to honor Nurgle, for death requires life and life requires death ...

The reason why it didn't work out that way in the real world is that the three big monotheistic religions are all different interpretations of the same God. Judaism is v1.0, Christianity is v2.0, Islam is v3.0. Christianity has a problem acknowledging Islam as "also valid" because they would have to explain why they didn't get the upgrade, so to speak. Talking your way around that contradiction requires some clever thinkers, which may not be there when some fanatics try to talk a village into a pogrom.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    Your council has portal technology and a desire for peace among all nations.
    Unlike the religions of the real world, this is a united clergy with a technological advantage over their followers. With such an advantage, such a council's rule would be absolute for as long as it managed or obscured its inner power struggles from the outside world.



    If the portal technological is interpreted as proof of divine intervention, then no other faith will be allowed to flourish without first providing a similarly irrefutable proof. To this end, keeping the portal technology guarded at the council locations will be critical.



    Equally important is the presentation of a united front among council members. People will assume that the gods live peacefully with each other as long as the representatives of those gods live peacefully together. To this end, I would suggest that you give the council members an additional technological advantage. Have each of them implanted with a brain-to-brain interface linked by a radio technology based in the same advanced physics as the portals.



    In this way, any council member can be in council with the rest of the council whenever they are in public. If a would-be radical tries to stir up a crowd based on the superiority of one of the gods over the others, a single council member, armed with the wisdom of the entire council can shut him down with peaceful words which simultaneously disprove his assertions while respecting and reinforcing the unifying image of a united pantheon of gods.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      0












      $begingroup$

      Don't Let the Gods Become Too Personal



      This was one of Augustine's complaints, growing up in the Roman pantheism, in 'City of God'. While Roman faith had it's mysteries, festivals, and plays, in Augustine's opinion, they were more oriented towards entertainment and education than disciplining adherents in a philosophy. As an argument to prove his point, Augustine pointed out how often Zeus played to role of villain in plays made in his honor, performed in his own temple.



      While certain cults (the Vestals come to mind) had special relationships with the gods, and expectations on both side, the general public did not.



      In contrast: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all have a special relationship between the believer and the god. In Judaism, every circumcised member of the race has been set apart as god's special people - with special rights, privileges, and responsibilities. Christians have a similar, but different special relationship. And Islam another. All three also try to proscribe a complete internally consistent moral philosophy that should provide for all your needs (which is not limited to just these three faiths).



      Hopefully the difference is obvious. While violating the sacred spaces of the Vestals might cause some outrage and bloodshed (because they are a special case), or more generally it might be fun to pick on minority religions (Hypatia of Alexandria) or just blame those minority religions for the unsettled nature of the world (Corinthians and early Christians), this level of faith is still not as visceral as sincerely believing your father/mother/wife/husband/son/daughter can have the eternal good life, and some practitioner of some other faith is leading him/her astray.



      If you can keep your faith entertaining, educational, fun, but not something as personal (or only as personal in a small number of cases; still not something everyone experiences) - I think it would work.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "579"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f151781%2fhow-can-religions-be-structured-in-ways-that-allow-inter-faith-councils-to-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        5












        $begingroup$

        What you describe are not different religions, they are different cults within one pantheistic religion.



        • Have all cults within the religion acknowledge the existence and necessity of the entire pantheon. Individuals can still decide to worship Khorne or Nagash, or even try to make their cult more prominent in society, but attacking other cults would be disrespect to a "relative of the boss." Bad idea ...

        • Make representatives of all cults necessary for the most holy rites of each individual cult. On this day, we have come together to honor Nurgle, for death requires life and life requires death ...

        The reason why it didn't work out that way in the real world is that the three big monotheistic religions are all different interpretations of the same God. Judaism is v1.0, Christianity is v2.0, Islam is v3.0. Christianity has a problem acknowledging Islam as "also valid" because they would have to explain why they didn't get the upgrade, so to speak. Talking your way around that contradiction requires some clever thinkers, which may not be there when some fanatics try to talk a village into a pogrom.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          5












          $begingroup$

          What you describe are not different religions, they are different cults within one pantheistic religion.



          • Have all cults within the religion acknowledge the existence and necessity of the entire pantheon. Individuals can still decide to worship Khorne or Nagash, or even try to make their cult more prominent in society, but attacking other cults would be disrespect to a "relative of the boss." Bad idea ...

          • Make representatives of all cults necessary for the most holy rites of each individual cult. On this day, we have come together to honor Nurgle, for death requires life and life requires death ...

          The reason why it didn't work out that way in the real world is that the three big monotheistic religions are all different interpretations of the same God. Judaism is v1.0, Christianity is v2.0, Islam is v3.0. Christianity has a problem acknowledging Islam as "also valid" because they would have to explain why they didn't get the upgrade, so to speak. Talking your way around that contradiction requires some clever thinkers, which may not be there when some fanatics try to talk a village into a pogrom.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            5












            5








            5





            $begingroup$

            What you describe are not different religions, they are different cults within one pantheistic religion.



            • Have all cults within the religion acknowledge the existence and necessity of the entire pantheon. Individuals can still decide to worship Khorne or Nagash, or even try to make their cult more prominent in society, but attacking other cults would be disrespect to a "relative of the boss." Bad idea ...

            • Make representatives of all cults necessary for the most holy rites of each individual cult. On this day, we have come together to honor Nurgle, for death requires life and life requires death ...

            The reason why it didn't work out that way in the real world is that the three big monotheistic religions are all different interpretations of the same God. Judaism is v1.0, Christianity is v2.0, Islam is v3.0. Christianity has a problem acknowledging Islam as "also valid" because they would have to explain why they didn't get the upgrade, so to speak. Talking your way around that contradiction requires some clever thinkers, which may not be there when some fanatics try to talk a village into a pogrom.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            What you describe are not different religions, they are different cults within one pantheistic religion.



            • Have all cults within the religion acknowledge the existence and necessity of the entire pantheon. Individuals can still decide to worship Khorne or Nagash, or even try to make their cult more prominent in society, but attacking other cults would be disrespect to a "relative of the boss." Bad idea ...

            • Make representatives of all cults necessary for the most holy rites of each individual cult. On this day, we have come together to honor Nurgle, for death requires life and life requires death ...

            The reason why it didn't work out that way in the real world is that the three big monotheistic religions are all different interpretations of the same God. Judaism is v1.0, Christianity is v2.0, Islam is v3.0. Christianity has a problem acknowledging Islam as "also valid" because they would have to explain why they didn't get the upgrade, so to speak. Talking your way around that contradiction requires some clever thinkers, which may not be there when some fanatics try to talk a village into a pogrom.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 7 hours ago









            o.m.o.m.

            67.3k7 gold badges100 silver badges226 bronze badges




            67.3k7 gold badges100 silver badges226 bronze badges























                1












                $begingroup$

                Your council has portal technology and a desire for peace among all nations.
                Unlike the religions of the real world, this is a united clergy with a technological advantage over their followers. With such an advantage, such a council's rule would be absolute for as long as it managed or obscured its inner power struggles from the outside world.



                If the portal technological is interpreted as proof of divine intervention, then no other faith will be allowed to flourish without first providing a similarly irrefutable proof. To this end, keeping the portal technology guarded at the council locations will be critical.



                Equally important is the presentation of a united front among council members. People will assume that the gods live peacefully with each other as long as the representatives of those gods live peacefully together. To this end, I would suggest that you give the council members an additional technological advantage. Have each of them implanted with a brain-to-brain interface linked by a radio technology based in the same advanced physics as the portals.



                In this way, any council member can be in council with the rest of the council whenever they are in public. If a would-be radical tries to stir up a crowd based on the superiority of one of the gods over the others, a single council member, armed with the wisdom of the entire council can shut him down with peaceful words which simultaneously disprove his assertions while respecting and reinforcing the unifying image of a united pantheon of gods.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  Your council has portal technology and a desire for peace among all nations.
                  Unlike the religions of the real world, this is a united clergy with a technological advantage over their followers. With such an advantage, such a council's rule would be absolute for as long as it managed or obscured its inner power struggles from the outside world.



                  If the portal technological is interpreted as proof of divine intervention, then no other faith will be allowed to flourish without first providing a similarly irrefutable proof. To this end, keeping the portal technology guarded at the council locations will be critical.



                  Equally important is the presentation of a united front among council members. People will assume that the gods live peacefully with each other as long as the representatives of those gods live peacefully together. To this end, I would suggest that you give the council members an additional technological advantage. Have each of them implanted with a brain-to-brain interface linked by a radio technology based in the same advanced physics as the portals.



                  In this way, any council member can be in council with the rest of the council whenever they are in public. If a would-be radical tries to stir up a crowd based on the superiority of one of the gods over the others, a single council member, armed with the wisdom of the entire council can shut him down with peaceful words which simultaneously disprove his assertions while respecting and reinforcing the unifying image of a united pantheon of gods.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    Your council has portal technology and a desire for peace among all nations.
                    Unlike the religions of the real world, this is a united clergy with a technological advantage over their followers. With such an advantage, such a council's rule would be absolute for as long as it managed or obscured its inner power struggles from the outside world.



                    If the portal technological is interpreted as proof of divine intervention, then no other faith will be allowed to flourish without first providing a similarly irrefutable proof. To this end, keeping the portal technology guarded at the council locations will be critical.



                    Equally important is the presentation of a united front among council members. People will assume that the gods live peacefully with each other as long as the representatives of those gods live peacefully together. To this end, I would suggest that you give the council members an additional technological advantage. Have each of them implanted with a brain-to-brain interface linked by a radio technology based in the same advanced physics as the portals.



                    In this way, any council member can be in council with the rest of the council whenever they are in public. If a would-be radical tries to stir up a crowd based on the superiority of one of the gods over the others, a single council member, armed with the wisdom of the entire council can shut him down with peaceful words which simultaneously disprove his assertions while respecting and reinforcing the unifying image of a united pantheon of gods.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Your council has portal technology and a desire for peace among all nations.
                    Unlike the religions of the real world, this is a united clergy with a technological advantage over their followers. With such an advantage, such a council's rule would be absolute for as long as it managed or obscured its inner power struggles from the outside world.



                    If the portal technological is interpreted as proof of divine intervention, then no other faith will be allowed to flourish without first providing a similarly irrefutable proof. To this end, keeping the portal technology guarded at the council locations will be critical.



                    Equally important is the presentation of a united front among council members. People will assume that the gods live peacefully with each other as long as the representatives of those gods live peacefully together. To this end, I would suggest that you give the council members an additional technological advantage. Have each of them implanted with a brain-to-brain interface linked by a radio technology based in the same advanced physics as the portals.



                    In this way, any council member can be in council with the rest of the council whenever they are in public. If a would-be radical tries to stir up a crowd based on the superiority of one of the gods over the others, a single council member, armed with the wisdom of the entire council can shut him down with peaceful words which simultaneously disprove his assertions while respecting and reinforcing the unifying image of a united pantheon of gods.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 7 hours ago









                    Henry TaylorHenry Taylor

                    48.8k10 gold badges76 silver badges178 bronze badges




                    48.8k10 gold badges76 silver badges178 bronze badges





















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Don't Let the Gods Become Too Personal



                        This was one of Augustine's complaints, growing up in the Roman pantheism, in 'City of God'. While Roman faith had it's mysteries, festivals, and plays, in Augustine's opinion, they were more oriented towards entertainment and education than disciplining adherents in a philosophy. As an argument to prove his point, Augustine pointed out how often Zeus played to role of villain in plays made in his honor, performed in his own temple.



                        While certain cults (the Vestals come to mind) had special relationships with the gods, and expectations on both side, the general public did not.



                        In contrast: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all have a special relationship between the believer and the god. In Judaism, every circumcised member of the race has been set apart as god's special people - with special rights, privileges, and responsibilities. Christians have a similar, but different special relationship. And Islam another. All three also try to proscribe a complete internally consistent moral philosophy that should provide for all your needs (which is not limited to just these three faiths).



                        Hopefully the difference is obvious. While violating the sacred spaces of the Vestals might cause some outrage and bloodshed (because they are a special case), or more generally it might be fun to pick on minority religions (Hypatia of Alexandria) or just blame those minority religions for the unsettled nature of the world (Corinthians and early Christians), this level of faith is still not as visceral as sincerely believing your father/mother/wife/husband/son/daughter can have the eternal good life, and some practitioner of some other faith is leading him/her astray.



                        If you can keep your faith entertaining, educational, fun, but not something as personal (or only as personal in a small number of cases; still not something everyone experiences) - I think it would work.






                        share|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$

















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          Don't Let the Gods Become Too Personal



                          This was one of Augustine's complaints, growing up in the Roman pantheism, in 'City of God'. While Roman faith had it's mysteries, festivals, and plays, in Augustine's opinion, they were more oriented towards entertainment and education than disciplining adherents in a philosophy. As an argument to prove his point, Augustine pointed out how often Zeus played to role of villain in plays made in his honor, performed in his own temple.



                          While certain cults (the Vestals come to mind) had special relationships with the gods, and expectations on both side, the general public did not.



                          In contrast: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all have a special relationship between the believer and the god. In Judaism, every circumcised member of the race has been set apart as god's special people - with special rights, privileges, and responsibilities. Christians have a similar, but different special relationship. And Islam another. All three also try to proscribe a complete internally consistent moral philosophy that should provide for all your needs (which is not limited to just these three faiths).



                          Hopefully the difference is obvious. While violating the sacred spaces of the Vestals might cause some outrage and bloodshed (because they are a special case), or more generally it might be fun to pick on minority religions (Hypatia of Alexandria) or just blame those minority religions for the unsettled nature of the world (Corinthians and early Christians), this level of faith is still not as visceral as sincerely believing your father/mother/wife/husband/son/daughter can have the eternal good life, and some practitioner of some other faith is leading him/her astray.



                          If you can keep your faith entertaining, educational, fun, but not something as personal (or only as personal in a small number of cases; still not something everyone experiences) - I think it would work.






                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            Don't Let the Gods Become Too Personal



                            This was one of Augustine's complaints, growing up in the Roman pantheism, in 'City of God'. While Roman faith had it's mysteries, festivals, and plays, in Augustine's opinion, they were more oriented towards entertainment and education than disciplining adherents in a philosophy. As an argument to prove his point, Augustine pointed out how often Zeus played to role of villain in plays made in his honor, performed in his own temple.



                            While certain cults (the Vestals come to mind) had special relationships with the gods, and expectations on both side, the general public did not.



                            In contrast: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all have a special relationship between the believer and the god. In Judaism, every circumcised member of the race has been set apart as god's special people - with special rights, privileges, and responsibilities. Christians have a similar, but different special relationship. And Islam another. All three also try to proscribe a complete internally consistent moral philosophy that should provide for all your needs (which is not limited to just these three faiths).



                            Hopefully the difference is obvious. While violating the sacred spaces of the Vestals might cause some outrage and bloodshed (because they are a special case), or more generally it might be fun to pick on minority religions (Hypatia of Alexandria) or just blame those minority religions for the unsettled nature of the world (Corinthians and early Christians), this level of faith is still not as visceral as sincerely believing your father/mother/wife/husband/son/daughter can have the eternal good life, and some practitioner of some other faith is leading him/her astray.



                            If you can keep your faith entertaining, educational, fun, but not something as personal (or only as personal in a small number of cases; still not something everyone experiences) - I think it would work.






                            share|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$



                            Don't Let the Gods Become Too Personal



                            This was one of Augustine's complaints, growing up in the Roman pantheism, in 'City of God'. While Roman faith had it's mysteries, festivals, and plays, in Augustine's opinion, they were more oriented towards entertainment and education than disciplining adherents in a philosophy. As an argument to prove his point, Augustine pointed out how often Zeus played to role of villain in plays made in his honor, performed in his own temple.



                            While certain cults (the Vestals come to mind) had special relationships with the gods, and expectations on both side, the general public did not.



                            In contrast: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all have a special relationship between the believer and the god. In Judaism, every circumcised member of the race has been set apart as god's special people - with special rights, privileges, and responsibilities. Christians have a similar, but different special relationship. And Islam another. All three also try to proscribe a complete internally consistent moral philosophy that should provide for all your needs (which is not limited to just these three faiths).



                            Hopefully the difference is obvious. While violating the sacred spaces of the Vestals might cause some outrage and bloodshed (because they are a special case), or more generally it might be fun to pick on minority religions (Hypatia of Alexandria) or just blame those minority religions for the unsettled nature of the world (Corinthians and early Christians), this level of faith is still not as visceral as sincerely believing your father/mother/wife/husband/son/daughter can have the eternal good life, and some practitioner of some other faith is leading him/her astray.



                            If you can keep your faith entertaining, educational, fun, but not something as personal (or only as personal in a small number of cases; still not something everyone experiences) - I think it would work.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited 3 mins ago

























                            answered 54 mins ago









                            James McLellanJames McLellan

                            6,6151 gold badge8 silver badges35 bronze badges




                            6,6151 gold badge8 silver badges35 bronze badges



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f151781%2fhow-can-religions-be-structured-in-ways-that-allow-inter-faith-councils-to-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                                Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                                François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480