How would you explain this difference in pointer to members of base and derived class using standard quotes?How to call a parent class function from derived class function?Pointer to class data member “::*”Purpose of Unions in C and C++Pretty-print C++ STL containersEfficient unsigned-to-signed cast avoiding implementation-defined behaviorWhy is f(i = -1, i = -1) undefined behavior?Why does the C++ linker allow undefined functions?restrict a template function, to only allow certain typesConverting a pointer-to-member-of-base to a pointer-to-member-of-derivedDoes the C++ standard allow for an uninitialized bool to crash a program?

Why does a Force divides equally on a Multiple Support/Legs?

Do details of my undergraduate title matter?

Setting up the trap

Implementation of the Jacobi Symbol in C

I found a password with hashcat but it doesn't work

Why there is a red color in right side?

Why is it easier to balance a non-moving bike standing up than sitting down?

First occurrence in the Sixers sequence

What does this Swiss black on yellow rectangular traffic sign with a symbol looking like a dart mean?

How can a warlock learn from a spellbook?

Why things float in space, though there is always gravity of our star is present

How did Frodo know where the Bree village was?

In Street Fighter, what does the M stand for in M Bison?

Why do you need to heat the pan before heating the olive oil?

Would a 7805 5 V regulator drain a 9 V battery?

Why is Havana covered in 5-digit numbers in Our Man in Havana?

How is the idea of "girlfriend material" naturally expressed in Russian?

What is the most suitable position for a bishop here?

60's (or earlier) sci-fi short story about two spacecrafts exchanging plants for gold and thinking they got the better of the exchange

Is there any possible way to get these hearts as Adult Link?

What kind of chart is this?

Freewill and rewarding dogs

Is using legacy mode instead of UEFI mode a bad thing to do?

How can I ping multiple IP addresses at the same time?



How would you explain this difference in pointer to members of base and derived class using standard quotes?


How to call a parent class function from derived class function?Pointer to class data member “::*”Purpose of Unions in C and C++Pretty-print C++ STL containersEfficient unsigned-to-signed cast avoiding implementation-defined behaviorWhy is f(i = -1, i = -1) undefined behavior?Why does the C++ linker allow undefined functions?restrict a template function, to only allow certain typesConverting a pointer-to-member-of-base to a pointer-to-member-of-derivedDoes the C++ standard allow for an uninitialized bool to crash a program?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








7















demo:



#include<iostream>
struct A int i = 10; ;
struct B : A ;

int main()
std::cout << "decltype(&B::i) == int A::* ? " << std::boolalpha
<< std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value << 'n'; //#1
A a;
std::cout << a.*(&A::i) << 'n';

std::cout << "decltype(&B::i) == int B::* ? "
<< std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int B::*>::value << 'n'; //#2
B b;
std::cout << b.*(&B::i) << 'n';



The code prints



decltype(&B::i) == int A::* ? true
10
decltype(&B::i) == int B::* ? false
10


I used the example in [expr.unary.op]/3, where the standard says that the type of &B::i is int A::*, but that is not normative.










share|improve this question






























    7















    demo:



    #include<iostream>
    struct A int i = 10; ;
    struct B : A ;

    int main()
    std::cout << "decltype(&B::i) == int A::* ? " << std::boolalpha
    << std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value << 'n'; //#1
    A a;
    std::cout << a.*(&A::i) << 'n';

    std::cout << "decltype(&B::i) == int B::* ? "
    << std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int B::*>::value << 'n'; //#2
    B b;
    std::cout << b.*(&B::i) << 'n';



    The code prints



    decltype(&B::i) == int A::* ? true
    10
    decltype(&B::i) == int B::* ? false
    10


    I used the example in [expr.unary.op]/3, where the standard says that the type of &B::i is int A::*, but that is not normative.










    share|improve this question


























      7












      7








      7








      demo:



      #include<iostream>
      struct A int i = 10; ;
      struct B : A ;

      int main()
      std::cout << "decltype(&B::i) == int A::* ? " << std::boolalpha
      << std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value << 'n'; //#1
      A a;
      std::cout << a.*(&A::i) << 'n';

      std::cout << "decltype(&B::i) == int B::* ? "
      << std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int B::*>::value << 'n'; //#2
      B b;
      std::cout << b.*(&B::i) << 'n';



      The code prints



      decltype(&B::i) == int A::* ? true
      10
      decltype(&B::i) == int B::* ? false
      10


      I used the example in [expr.unary.op]/3, where the standard says that the type of &B::i is int A::*, but that is not normative.










      share|improve this question
















      demo:



      #include<iostream>
      struct A int i = 10; ;
      struct B : A ;

      int main()
      std::cout << "decltype(&B::i) == int A::* ? " << std::boolalpha
      << std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value << 'n'; //#1
      A a;
      std::cout << a.*(&A::i) << 'n';

      std::cout << "decltype(&B::i) == int B::* ? "
      << std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int B::*>::value << 'n'; //#2
      B b;
      std::cout << b.*(&B::i) << 'n';



      The code prints



      decltype(&B::i) == int A::* ? true
      10
      decltype(&B::i) == int B::* ? false
      10


      I used the example in [expr.unary.op]/3, where the standard says that the type of &B::i is int A::*, but that is not normative.







      c++ language-lawyer pointer-to-member






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 14 mins ago









      Fabio Turati

      2,75652542




      2,75652542










      asked 11 hours ago









      AlexanderAlexander

      985414




      985414






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          From the paragraph you link to, emphasis mine:




          If the operand is a qualified-id naming a non-static or variant member
          m of some class C with type T, the result has type “pointer to member
          of class C of type T” and is a prvalue designating C::m.




          "Some class C" means it need not be the same class as the one mentioned by the qualified-id. In this case, i is a member of A, and remains a member of A even when named by &B::i. The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*, which you can verify by the test



          std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value


          According to [class.qual]/1, member lookup follows the algorithm detailed in [class.member.lookup]. It is according to the rules there, which inspect the sub-object from which the member i comes from, that the class C is determined. Since i is a member of the sub-object A, the class of the pointer to member is determined to be A.






          share|improve this answer

























          • To add some additional commentary: This follows on from the way that a pointer-to-member-of-base can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-member-of-derived (in contrast to the way that pointer-to-derived can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-base).

            – Martin Bonner
            10 hours ago











          • I'm not convinced by your conclusion: "Some class C means .... The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*.

            – Alexander
            10 hours ago







          • 1





            @Alexander - My conclusion is backed by the member lookup algorithm. And the wording of "some class" is not coincidental.

            – StoryTeller
            10 hours ago











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f56619345%2fhow-would-you-explain-this-difference-in-pointer-to-members-of-base-and-derived%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7














          From the paragraph you link to, emphasis mine:




          If the operand is a qualified-id naming a non-static or variant member
          m of some class C with type T, the result has type “pointer to member
          of class C of type T” and is a prvalue designating C::m.




          "Some class C" means it need not be the same class as the one mentioned by the qualified-id. In this case, i is a member of A, and remains a member of A even when named by &B::i. The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*, which you can verify by the test



          std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value


          According to [class.qual]/1, member lookup follows the algorithm detailed in [class.member.lookup]. It is according to the rules there, which inspect the sub-object from which the member i comes from, that the class C is determined. Since i is a member of the sub-object A, the class of the pointer to member is determined to be A.






          share|improve this answer

























          • To add some additional commentary: This follows on from the way that a pointer-to-member-of-base can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-member-of-derived (in contrast to the way that pointer-to-derived can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-base).

            – Martin Bonner
            10 hours ago











          • I'm not convinced by your conclusion: "Some class C means .... The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*.

            – Alexander
            10 hours ago







          • 1





            @Alexander - My conclusion is backed by the member lookup algorithm. And the wording of "some class" is not coincidental.

            – StoryTeller
            10 hours ago















          7














          From the paragraph you link to, emphasis mine:




          If the operand is a qualified-id naming a non-static or variant member
          m of some class C with type T, the result has type “pointer to member
          of class C of type T” and is a prvalue designating C::m.




          "Some class C" means it need not be the same class as the one mentioned by the qualified-id. In this case, i is a member of A, and remains a member of A even when named by &B::i. The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*, which you can verify by the test



          std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value


          According to [class.qual]/1, member lookup follows the algorithm detailed in [class.member.lookup]. It is according to the rules there, which inspect the sub-object from which the member i comes from, that the class C is determined. Since i is a member of the sub-object A, the class of the pointer to member is determined to be A.






          share|improve this answer

























          • To add some additional commentary: This follows on from the way that a pointer-to-member-of-base can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-member-of-derived (in contrast to the way that pointer-to-derived can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-base).

            – Martin Bonner
            10 hours ago











          • I'm not convinced by your conclusion: "Some class C means .... The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*.

            – Alexander
            10 hours ago







          • 1





            @Alexander - My conclusion is backed by the member lookup algorithm. And the wording of "some class" is not coincidental.

            – StoryTeller
            10 hours ago













          7












          7








          7







          From the paragraph you link to, emphasis mine:




          If the operand is a qualified-id naming a non-static or variant member
          m of some class C with type T, the result has type “pointer to member
          of class C of type T” and is a prvalue designating C::m.




          "Some class C" means it need not be the same class as the one mentioned by the qualified-id. In this case, i is a member of A, and remains a member of A even when named by &B::i. The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*, which you can verify by the test



          std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value


          According to [class.qual]/1, member lookup follows the algorithm detailed in [class.member.lookup]. It is according to the rules there, which inspect the sub-object from which the member i comes from, that the class C is determined. Since i is a member of the sub-object A, the class of the pointer to member is determined to be A.






          share|improve this answer















          From the paragraph you link to, emphasis mine:




          If the operand is a qualified-id naming a non-static or variant member
          m of some class C with type T, the result has type “pointer to member
          of class C of type T” and is a prvalue designating C::m.




          "Some class C" means it need not be the same class as the one mentioned by the qualified-id. In this case, i is a member of A, and remains a member of A even when named by &B::i. The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*, which you can verify by the test



          std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value


          According to [class.qual]/1, member lookup follows the algorithm detailed in [class.member.lookup]. It is according to the rules there, which inspect the sub-object from which the member i comes from, that the class C is determined. Since i is a member of the sub-object A, the class of the pointer to member is determined to be A.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 10 hours ago

























          answered 10 hours ago









          StoryTellerStoryTeller

          112k17236303




          112k17236303












          • To add some additional commentary: This follows on from the way that a pointer-to-member-of-base can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-member-of-derived (in contrast to the way that pointer-to-derived can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-base).

            – Martin Bonner
            10 hours ago











          • I'm not convinced by your conclusion: "Some class C means .... The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*.

            – Alexander
            10 hours ago







          • 1





            @Alexander - My conclusion is backed by the member lookup algorithm. And the wording of "some class" is not coincidental.

            – StoryTeller
            10 hours ago

















          • To add some additional commentary: This follows on from the way that a pointer-to-member-of-base can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-member-of-derived (in contrast to the way that pointer-to-derived can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-base).

            – Martin Bonner
            10 hours ago











          • I'm not convinced by your conclusion: "Some class C means .... The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*.

            – Alexander
            10 hours ago







          • 1





            @Alexander - My conclusion is backed by the member lookup algorithm. And the wording of "some class" is not coincidental.

            – StoryTeller
            10 hours ago
















          To add some additional commentary: This follows on from the way that a pointer-to-member-of-base can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-member-of-derived (in contrast to the way that pointer-to-derived can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-base).

          – Martin Bonner
          10 hours ago





          To add some additional commentary: This follows on from the way that a pointer-to-member-of-base can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-member-of-derived (in contrast to the way that pointer-to-derived can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-base).

          – Martin Bonner
          10 hours ago













          I'm not convinced by your conclusion: "Some class C means .... The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*.

          – Alexander
          10 hours ago






          I'm not convinced by your conclusion: "Some class C means .... The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*.

          – Alexander
          10 hours ago





          1




          1





          @Alexander - My conclusion is backed by the member lookup algorithm. And the wording of "some class" is not coincidental.

          – StoryTeller
          10 hours ago





          @Alexander - My conclusion is backed by the member lookup algorithm. And the wording of "some class" is not coincidental.

          – StoryTeller
          10 hours ago



















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f56619345%2fhow-would-you-explain-this-difference-in-pointer-to-members-of-base-and-derived%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її