Why does this pattern in powers happen?Pattern puzzle helpWhy there is this kind of relation between power and factorial?Perfect powers of successive naturals: Can you always reach a constant difference?Generalize finding perfect squares by adding odd numbersFinding a pattern regarding perfect cubes.Consecutive prime powers $p^m<q^n$ such that $q^n-p^m=11$Finding unrelated numbers that are awfully closeUnexpected pattern in consecutive 7 digit “double” palindromes?Factors of a number get sparserOn numbers with small $varphi(n)/n$
Why doesn't increasing the temperature of something like wood or paper set them on fire?
How could a civilization detect tachyons?
Do you take falling damage if falling from 20 feet or less while grappled by someone affected by the Cat's Grace option of the Enhance Ability spell?
Partition error (Fdisk/Parted)
How to start your Starctaft II games vs AI immediatly?
Opposite party turned away from voting when ballot is all opposing party
Add elements inside Array conditionally in JavaScript
How long can fsck take on a 30 TB volume?
Why doesn't Dany protect her dragons better?
Why does this pattern in powers happen?
Does this website provide consistent translation into Wookiee?
Can a character shove an enemy who is already prone?
The unknown and unexplained in science fiction
I'm attempting to understand my 401k match and how much I need to contribute to maximize the match
why it is 2>&1 and not 2>>&1 to append to a log file
Do oversize pulley wheels increase derailleur capacity?
Capturing the entire webpage with WebExecute's CaptureImage
Where do 5 or more U.S. counties meet in a single point?
I want to write a blog post building upon someone else's paper, how can I properly cite/credit them?
Why did Missandei say this?
Why did Ham the Chimp push levers?
My parents are Afghan
Are there vaccine ingredients which may not be disclosed ("hidden", "trade secret", or similar)?
Two (probably) equal real numbers which are not proved to be equal?
Why does this pattern in powers happen?
Pattern puzzle helpWhy there is this kind of relation between power and factorial?Perfect powers of successive naturals: Can you always reach a constant difference?Generalize finding perfect squares by adding odd numbersFinding a pattern regarding perfect cubes.Consecutive prime powers $p^m<q^n$ such that $q^n-p^m=11$Finding unrelated numbers that are awfully closeUnexpected pattern in consecutive 7 digit “double” palindromes?Factors of a number get sparserOn numbers with small $varphi(n)/n$
$begingroup$
Hopefully this not to frivolous to ask, I have wondered it for years. There is a strange pattern in the differences between various power.
For example if you square the numbers from one to ten the difference between each square is the odds numbers. Similar patterns exist in the powers through 6 (and I assume all of them).
I attached an example of what I mean. Does anyone know why this occurs. For each higher power the pattern moves one to the "right"

elementary-number-theory square-numbers
$endgroup$
migrated from stats.stackexchange.com 2 hours ago
This question came from our site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hopefully this not to frivolous to ask, I have wondered it for years. There is a strange pattern in the differences between various power.
For example if you square the numbers from one to ten the difference between each square is the odds numbers. Similar patterns exist in the powers through 6 (and I assume all of them).
I attached an example of what I mean. Does anyone know why this occurs. For each higher power the pattern moves one to the "right"

elementary-number-theory square-numbers
$endgroup$
migrated from stats.stackexchange.com 2 hours ago
This question came from our site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization.
2
$begingroup$
$a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b)$
$endgroup$
– Milan Stojanovic
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
1) in any consecutive pair of integer $m, m+1$, one of them is even, the other is odd. 2) an even number raised to power is an even number, an odd number raised to power is an odd number. 3) the difference of an odd and even number is odd.
$endgroup$
– achille hui
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hopefully this not to frivolous to ask, I have wondered it for years. There is a strange pattern in the differences between various power.
For example if you square the numbers from one to ten the difference between each square is the odds numbers. Similar patterns exist in the powers through 6 (and I assume all of them).
I attached an example of what I mean. Does anyone know why this occurs. For each higher power the pattern moves one to the "right"

elementary-number-theory square-numbers
$endgroup$
Hopefully this not to frivolous to ask, I have wondered it for years. There is a strange pattern in the differences between various power.
For example if you square the numbers from one to ten the difference between each square is the odds numbers. Similar patterns exist in the powers through 6 (and I assume all of them).
I attached an example of what I mean. Does anyone know why this occurs. For each higher power the pattern moves one to the "right"

elementary-number-theory square-numbers
elementary-number-theory square-numbers
edited 2 hours ago
NoChance
3,79221321
3,79221321
asked 3 hours ago
user54285
migrated from stats.stackexchange.com 2 hours ago
This question came from our site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization.
migrated from stats.stackexchange.com 2 hours ago
This question came from our site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization.
2
$begingroup$
$a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b)$
$endgroup$
– Milan Stojanovic
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
1) in any consecutive pair of integer $m, m+1$, one of them is even, the other is odd. 2) an even number raised to power is an even number, an odd number raised to power is an odd number. 3) the difference of an odd and even number is odd.
$endgroup$
– achille hui
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
$a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b)$
$endgroup$
– Milan Stojanovic
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
1) in any consecutive pair of integer $m, m+1$, one of them is even, the other is odd. 2) an even number raised to power is an even number, an odd number raised to power is an odd number. 3) the difference of an odd and even number is odd.
$endgroup$
– achille hui
2 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
$a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b)$
$endgroup$
– Milan Stojanovic
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
$a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b)$
$endgroup$
– Milan Stojanovic
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
1) in any consecutive pair of integer $m, m+1$, one of them is even, the other is odd. 2) an even number raised to power is an even number, an odd number raised to power is an odd number. 3) the difference of an odd and even number is odd.
$endgroup$
– achille hui
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
1) in any consecutive pair of integer $m, m+1$, one of them is even, the other is odd. 2) an even number raised to power is an even number, an odd number raised to power is an odd number. 3) the difference of an odd and even number is odd.
$endgroup$
– achille hui
2 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is a well-known result analogous to the formula $$ fracd^kdx^k x^k = k!$$for differentiation of polynomials. I'll try to state it clearly:
Definition: Let the discrete derivative of a sequence $a_1, a_2, a_3, ldots$ be the sequence $a'_n := a_n+1 - a_n$.
Remark: The discrete derivative is a linear operator. That is, if $c_n = alpha a_n + beta b_n$ for some constants $alpha$ and $beta$, then $c'_n = alpha a'_n + beta b'_n$.
Notation: Iterated discrete derivatives can be notated by parenthesized superscripts; thus $c^(2)$ for $c''$, $c^(3)$ for $c'''$, and so on.
Theorem: For some $k geq 1$ fixed, let $a_n = n^k$ be the sequence of $k$th powers. Then $a_n^(k) = k!$ for all $n$.
Remark: An immediate consequence of this statement, used in a proof by induction, is that $a_n^(ell) = 0$ if $k < ell$.
Proof. The result is obvious for $k = 1$. Now assume that the result holds for all integers less than $k$. Then $$a'_n = (n+1)^k - n^k = k n^k-1 + binomk2 n^k-2 + binomk3 n^k-3 + cdots + kn + 1.$$
We know that $a_n^(k)$ is the $k-1$th discrete derivative of the RHS. Because the discrete derivative is a linear operator, we can take the derivative of each term on the RHS by itself. We know by the induction hypothesis that the $k-1$th derivative of $n^k-1$ is $(k-1)!$ and that the $k-1$th derivative of every other term in the RHS is zero, and we're done.
Note that the $k$th discrete derivative is a constant $k!$ for any polynomial with leading term $n^k$, not just the $k$th powers, as terms of smaller order drop out.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If we have a polynomial $p(x)$ of degree $n$ with coefficients $a_iinmathbbR$ then we can write this as
$$p(x)=a_0+a_1x+a_2x^2+dots+a_nx^n$$
We can use the backward difference operator on this polynomial to get
$$nabla p(x)=p(x)-p(x-1)=sum_k=0^n(a_kx^k-a_k(x-1)^k)$$
The resulting polynomial is always of degree one less than the intial polynomial which can be proven by noting that
$$beginalign
sum_k=0^n(a_kx^k-a_k(x-1)^k)
&=sum_k=0^n(a_kx^k-a_ksum_j=0^kbinomkjx^j(-1)^k-j)\
&=-a_ksum_j=0^k-1binomkjx^j(-1)^k-j+sum_k=0^n-1(a_kx^k-a_ksum_j=0^kbinomkjx^j(-1)^k-j)\
endalign$$
Hence this process can be repeated on the resulting polynomial which will once again reduce the degree by one. Eventually the polynomial degree is reduced to zero in which case each term is constant and equal to the difference between the terms in the previous polynomial.
In your case you have an initial polynomial of
$$p(x)=x^k$$
for some $kinmathbbN$ and hence we can see that
$$nabla p(x)=x^k-(x-1)^k=x^k-sum_j=0^kbinomkjx^j(-1)^k-j=kx^k-1-frack(k-1)2x^k-2+dots$$
which means that this repeated process will both reduce the degree of the polynomial by one and multiply the highest power term of the polynomial by the highest power of the previous polynomial leaving a degree zero polynomial of $k(k-1)(k-2)dots(1)=k!$ as a 'constant difference' between the corresponding degree one polynomial before it.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are computing the finite differences of order $n-1$ of the $n^th$ powers of the integers.
Observe that by the binomial theorem, if we compute the first order difference of $m^n$ we have
$$(m+1)^n-m^n=nm^n-1+fracn(n-1)2m^n-2+cdots$$
Two important facts:
we started from a polynomial in $m$ of degree $n$, and obtained a polynomial of degree $n-1$;
the leading term has been multiplied by $n$.
If we iterate $n-1$ times, we obtain a polynomial of degree $1$ (linear) and the leading term has been multiplied by $n!$. Hence the general term is
$$n!m+c.$$
The $n^th$ column is the constant $n!$
The top values in every column have a closed form given here: https://oeis.org/A028246 (consider all subsequences starting with a $1$).
$$a(n,k) = frac1ksum_i=0^k (-1)^k-ibinom kii^n$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3217620%2fwhy-does-this-pattern-in-powers-happen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is a well-known result analogous to the formula $$ fracd^kdx^k x^k = k!$$for differentiation of polynomials. I'll try to state it clearly:
Definition: Let the discrete derivative of a sequence $a_1, a_2, a_3, ldots$ be the sequence $a'_n := a_n+1 - a_n$.
Remark: The discrete derivative is a linear operator. That is, if $c_n = alpha a_n + beta b_n$ for some constants $alpha$ and $beta$, then $c'_n = alpha a'_n + beta b'_n$.
Notation: Iterated discrete derivatives can be notated by parenthesized superscripts; thus $c^(2)$ for $c''$, $c^(3)$ for $c'''$, and so on.
Theorem: For some $k geq 1$ fixed, let $a_n = n^k$ be the sequence of $k$th powers. Then $a_n^(k) = k!$ for all $n$.
Remark: An immediate consequence of this statement, used in a proof by induction, is that $a_n^(ell) = 0$ if $k < ell$.
Proof. The result is obvious for $k = 1$. Now assume that the result holds for all integers less than $k$. Then $$a'_n = (n+1)^k - n^k = k n^k-1 + binomk2 n^k-2 + binomk3 n^k-3 + cdots + kn + 1.$$
We know that $a_n^(k)$ is the $k-1$th discrete derivative of the RHS. Because the discrete derivative is a linear operator, we can take the derivative of each term on the RHS by itself. We know by the induction hypothesis that the $k-1$th derivative of $n^k-1$ is $(k-1)!$ and that the $k-1$th derivative of every other term in the RHS is zero, and we're done.
Note that the $k$th discrete derivative is a constant $k!$ for any polynomial with leading term $n^k$, not just the $k$th powers, as terms of smaller order drop out.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a well-known result analogous to the formula $$ fracd^kdx^k x^k = k!$$for differentiation of polynomials. I'll try to state it clearly:
Definition: Let the discrete derivative of a sequence $a_1, a_2, a_3, ldots$ be the sequence $a'_n := a_n+1 - a_n$.
Remark: The discrete derivative is a linear operator. That is, if $c_n = alpha a_n + beta b_n$ for some constants $alpha$ and $beta$, then $c'_n = alpha a'_n + beta b'_n$.
Notation: Iterated discrete derivatives can be notated by parenthesized superscripts; thus $c^(2)$ for $c''$, $c^(3)$ for $c'''$, and so on.
Theorem: For some $k geq 1$ fixed, let $a_n = n^k$ be the sequence of $k$th powers. Then $a_n^(k) = k!$ for all $n$.
Remark: An immediate consequence of this statement, used in a proof by induction, is that $a_n^(ell) = 0$ if $k < ell$.
Proof. The result is obvious for $k = 1$. Now assume that the result holds for all integers less than $k$. Then $$a'_n = (n+1)^k - n^k = k n^k-1 + binomk2 n^k-2 + binomk3 n^k-3 + cdots + kn + 1.$$
We know that $a_n^(k)$ is the $k-1$th discrete derivative of the RHS. Because the discrete derivative is a linear operator, we can take the derivative of each term on the RHS by itself. We know by the induction hypothesis that the $k-1$th derivative of $n^k-1$ is $(k-1)!$ and that the $k-1$th derivative of every other term in the RHS is zero, and we're done.
Note that the $k$th discrete derivative is a constant $k!$ for any polynomial with leading term $n^k$, not just the $k$th powers, as terms of smaller order drop out.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a well-known result analogous to the formula $$ fracd^kdx^k x^k = k!$$for differentiation of polynomials. I'll try to state it clearly:
Definition: Let the discrete derivative of a sequence $a_1, a_2, a_3, ldots$ be the sequence $a'_n := a_n+1 - a_n$.
Remark: The discrete derivative is a linear operator. That is, if $c_n = alpha a_n + beta b_n$ for some constants $alpha$ and $beta$, then $c'_n = alpha a'_n + beta b'_n$.
Notation: Iterated discrete derivatives can be notated by parenthesized superscripts; thus $c^(2)$ for $c''$, $c^(3)$ for $c'''$, and so on.
Theorem: For some $k geq 1$ fixed, let $a_n = n^k$ be the sequence of $k$th powers. Then $a_n^(k) = k!$ for all $n$.
Remark: An immediate consequence of this statement, used in a proof by induction, is that $a_n^(ell) = 0$ if $k < ell$.
Proof. The result is obvious for $k = 1$. Now assume that the result holds for all integers less than $k$. Then $$a'_n = (n+1)^k - n^k = k n^k-1 + binomk2 n^k-2 + binomk3 n^k-3 + cdots + kn + 1.$$
We know that $a_n^(k)$ is the $k-1$th discrete derivative of the RHS. Because the discrete derivative is a linear operator, we can take the derivative of each term on the RHS by itself. We know by the induction hypothesis that the $k-1$th derivative of $n^k-1$ is $(k-1)!$ and that the $k-1$th derivative of every other term in the RHS is zero, and we're done.
Note that the $k$th discrete derivative is a constant $k!$ for any polynomial with leading term $n^k$, not just the $k$th powers, as terms of smaller order drop out.
$endgroup$
This is a well-known result analogous to the formula $$ fracd^kdx^k x^k = k!$$for differentiation of polynomials. I'll try to state it clearly:
Definition: Let the discrete derivative of a sequence $a_1, a_2, a_3, ldots$ be the sequence $a'_n := a_n+1 - a_n$.
Remark: The discrete derivative is a linear operator. That is, if $c_n = alpha a_n + beta b_n$ for some constants $alpha$ and $beta$, then $c'_n = alpha a'_n + beta b'_n$.
Notation: Iterated discrete derivatives can be notated by parenthesized superscripts; thus $c^(2)$ for $c''$, $c^(3)$ for $c'''$, and so on.
Theorem: For some $k geq 1$ fixed, let $a_n = n^k$ be the sequence of $k$th powers. Then $a_n^(k) = k!$ for all $n$.
Remark: An immediate consequence of this statement, used in a proof by induction, is that $a_n^(ell) = 0$ if $k < ell$.
Proof. The result is obvious for $k = 1$. Now assume that the result holds for all integers less than $k$. Then $$a'_n = (n+1)^k - n^k = k n^k-1 + binomk2 n^k-2 + binomk3 n^k-3 + cdots + kn + 1.$$
We know that $a_n^(k)$ is the $k-1$th discrete derivative of the RHS. Because the discrete derivative is a linear operator, we can take the derivative of each term on the RHS by itself. We know by the induction hypothesis that the $k-1$th derivative of $n^k-1$ is $(k-1)!$ and that the $k-1$th derivative of every other term in the RHS is zero, and we're done.
Note that the $k$th discrete derivative is a constant $k!$ for any polynomial with leading term $n^k$, not just the $k$th powers, as terms of smaller order drop out.
answered 2 hours ago
Connor HarrisConnor Harris
4,545724
4,545724
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If we have a polynomial $p(x)$ of degree $n$ with coefficients $a_iinmathbbR$ then we can write this as
$$p(x)=a_0+a_1x+a_2x^2+dots+a_nx^n$$
We can use the backward difference operator on this polynomial to get
$$nabla p(x)=p(x)-p(x-1)=sum_k=0^n(a_kx^k-a_k(x-1)^k)$$
The resulting polynomial is always of degree one less than the intial polynomial which can be proven by noting that
$$beginalign
sum_k=0^n(a_kx^k-a_k(x-1)^k)
&=sum_k=0^n(a_kx^k-a_ksum_j=0^kbinomkjx^j(-1)^k-j)\
&=-a_ksum_j=0^k-1binomkjx^j(-1)^k-j+sum_k=0^n-1(a_kx^k-a_ksum_j=0^kbinomkjx^j(-1)^k-j)\
endalign$$
Hence this process can be repeated on the resulting polynomial which will once again reduce the degree by one. Eventually the polynomial degree is reduced to zero in which case each term is constant and equal to the difference between the terms in the previous polynomial.
In your case you have an initial polynomial of
$$p(x)=x^k$$
for some $kinmathbbN$ and hence we can see that
$$nabla p(x)=x^k-(x-1)^k=x^k-sum_j=0^kbinomkjx^j(-1)^k-j=kx^k-1-frack(k-1)2x^k-2+dots$$
which means that this repeated process will both reduce the degree of the polynomial by one and multiply the highest power term of the polynomial by the highest power of the previous polynomial leaving a degree zero polynomial of $k(k-1)(k-2)dots(1)=k!$ as a 'constant difference' between the corresponding degree one polynomial before it.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If we have a polynomial $p(x)$ of degree $n$ with coefficients $a_iinmathbbR$ then we can write this as
$$p(x)=a_0+a_1x+a_2x^2+dots+a_nx^n$$
We can use the backward difference operator on this polynomial to get
$$nabla p(x)=p(x)-p(x-1)=sum_k=0^n(a_kx^k-a_k(x-1)^k)$$
The resulting polynomial is always of degree one less than the intial polynomial which can be proven by noting that
$$beginalign
sum_k=0^n(a_kx^k-a_k(x-1)^k)
&=sum_k=0^n(a_kx^k-a_ksum_j=0^kbinomkjx^j(-1)^k-j)\
&=-a_ksum_j=0^k-1binomkjx^j(-1)^k-j+sum_k=0^n-1(a_kx^k-a_ksum_j=0^kbinomkjx^j(-1)^k-j)\
endalign$$
Hence this process can be repeated on the resulting polynomial which will once again reduce the degree by one. Eventually the polynomial degree is reduced to zero in which case each term is constant and equal to the difference between the terms in the previous polynomial.
In your case you have an initial polynomial of
$$p(x)=x^k$$
for some $kinmathbbN$ and hence we can see that
$$nabla p(x)=x^k-(x-1)^k=x^k-sum_j=0^kbinomkjx^j(-1)^k-j=kx^k-1-frack(k-1)2x^k-2+dots$$
which means that this repeated process will both reduce the degree of the polynomial by one and multiply the highest power term of the polynomial by the highest power of the previous polynomial leaving a degree zero polynomial of $k(k-1)(k-2)dots(1)=k!$ as a 'constant difference' between the corresponding degree one polynomial before it.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If we have a polynomial $p(x)$ of degree $n$ with coefficients $a_iinmathbbR$ then we can write this as
$$p(x)=a_0+a_1x+a_2x^2+dots+a_nx^n$$
We can use the backward difference operator on this polynomial to get
$$nabla p(x)=p(x)-p(x-1)=sum_k=0^n(a_kx^k-a_k(x-1)^k)$$
The resulting polynomial is always of degree one less than the intial polynomial which can be proven by noting that
$$beginalign
sum_k=0^n(a_kx^k-a_k(x-1)^k)
&=sum_k=0^n(a_kx^k-a_ksum_j=0^kbinomkjx^j(-1)^k-j)\
&=-a_ksum_j=0^k-1binomkjx^j(-1)^k-j+sum_k=0^n-1(a_kx^k-a_ksum_j=0^kbinomkjx^j(-1)^k-j)\
endalign$$
Hence this process can be repeated on the resulting polynomial which will once again reduce the degree by one. Eventually the polynomial degree is reduced to zero in which case each term is constant and equal to the difference between the terms in the previous polynomial.
In your case you have an initial polynomial of
$$p(x)=x^k$$
for some $kinmathbbN$ and hence we can see that
$$nabla p(x)=x^k-(x-1)^k=x^k-sum_j=0^kbinomkjx^j(-1)^k-j=kx^k-1-frack(k-1)2x^k-2+dots$$
which means that this repeated process will both reduce the degree of the polynomial by one and multiply the highest power term of the polynomial by the highest power of the previous polynomial leaving a degree zero polynomial of $k(k-1)(k-2)dots(1)=k!$ as a 'constant difference' between the corresponding degree one polynomial before it.
$endgroup$
If we have a polynomial $p(x)$ of degree $n$ with coefficients $a_iinmathbbR$ then we can write this as
$$p(x)=a_0+a_1x+a_2x^2+dots+a_nx^n$$
We can use the backward difference operator on this polynomial to get
$$nabla p(x)=p(x)-p(x-1)=sum_k=0^n(a_kx^k-a_k(x-1)^k)$$
The resulting polynomial is always of degree one less than the intial polynomial which can be proven by noting that
$$beginalign
sum_k=0^n(a_kx^k-a_k(x-1)^k)
&=sum_k=0^n(a_kx^k-a_ksum_j=0^kbinomkjx^j(-1)^k-j)\
&=-a_ksum_j=0^k-1binomkjx^j(-1)^k-j+sum_k=0^n-1(a_kx^k-a_ksum_j=0^kbinomkjx^j(-1)^k-j)\
endalign$$
Hence this process can be repeated on the resulting polynomial which will once again reduce the degree by one. Eventually the polynomial degree is reduced to zero in which case each term is constant and equal to the difference between the terms in the previous polynomial.
In your case you have an initial polynomial of
$$p(x)=x^k$$
for some $kinmathbbN$ and hence we can see that
$$nabla p(x)=x^k-(x-1)^k=x^k-sum_j=0^kbinomkjx^j(-1)^k-j=kx^k-1-frack(k-1)2x^k-2+dots$$
which means that this repeated process will both reduce the degree of the polynomial by one and multiply the highest power term of the polynomial by the highest power of the previous polynomial leaving a degree zero polynomial of $k(k-1)(k-2)dots(1)=k!$ as a 'constant difference' between the corresponding degree one polynomial before it.
answered 2 hours ago
Peter ForemanPeter Foreman
9,5881321
9,5881321
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are computing the finite differences of order $n-1$ of the $n^th$ powers of the integers.
Observe that by the binomial theorem, if we compute the first order difference of $m^n$ we have
$$(m+1)^n-m^n=nm^n-1+fracn(n-1)2m^n-2+cdots$$
Two important facts:
we started from a polynomial in $m$ of degree $n$, and obtained a polynomial of degree $n-1$;
the leading term has been multiplied by $n$.
If we iterate $n-1$ times, we obtain a polynomial of degree $1$ (linear) and the leading term has been multiplied by $n!$. Hence the general term is
$$n!m+c.$$
The $n^th$ column is the constant $n!$
The top values in every column have a closed form given here: https://oeis.org/A028246 (consider all subsequences starting with a $1$).
$$a(n,k) = frac1ksum_i=0^k (-1)^k-ibinom kii^n$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are computing the finite differences of order $n-1$ of the $n^th$ powers of the integers.
Observe that by the binomial theorem, if we compute the first order difference of $m^n$ we have
$$(m+1)^n-m^n=nm^n-1+fracn(n-1)2m^n-2+cdots$$
Two important facts:
we started from a polynomial in $m$ of degree $n$, and obtained a polynomial of degree $n-1$;
the leading term has been multiplied by $n$.
If we iterate $n-1$ times, we obtain a polynomial of degree $1$ (linear) and the leading term has been multiplied by $n!$. Hence the general term is
$$n!m+c.$$
The $n^th$ column is the constant $n!$
The top values in every column have a closed form given here: https://oeis.org/A028246 (consider all subsequences starting with a $1$).
$$a(n,k) = frac1ksum_i=0^k (-1)^k-ibinom kii^n$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are computing the finite differences of order $n-1$ of the $n^th$ powers of the integers.
Observe that by the binomial theorem, if we compute the first order difference of $m^n$ we have
$$(m+1)^n-m^n=nm^n-1+fracn(n-1)2m^n-2+cdots$$
Two important facts:
we started from a polynomial in $m$ of degree $n$, and obtained a polynomial of degree $n-1$;
the leading term has been multiplied by $n$.
If we iterate $n-1$ times, we obtain a polynomial of degree $1$ (linear) and the leading term has been multiplied by $n!$. Hence the general term is
$$n!m+c.$$
The $n^th$ column is the constant $n!$
The top values in every column have a closed form given here: https://oeis.org/A028246 (consider all subsequences starting with a $1$).
$$a(n,k) = frac1ksum_i=0^k (-1)^k-ibinom kii^n$$
$endgroup$
You are computing the finite differences of order $n-1$ of the $n^th$ powers of the integers.
Observe that by the binomial theorem, if we compute the first order difference of $m^n$ we have
$$(m+1)^n-m^n=nm^n-1+fracn(n-1)2m^n-2+cdots$$
Two important facts:
we started from a polynomial in $m$ of degree $n$, and obtained a polynomial of degree $n-1$;
the leading term has been multiplied by $n$.
If we iterate $n-1$ times, we obtain a polynomial of degree $1$ (linear) and the leading term has been multiplied by $n!$. Hence the general term is
$$n!m+c.$$
The $n^th$ column is the constant $n!$
The top values in every column have a closed form given here: https://oeis.org/A028246 (consider all subsequences starting with a $1$).
$$a(n,k) = frac1ksum_i=0^k (-1)^k-ibinom kii^n$$
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
Yves DaoustYves Daoust
135k676234
135k676234
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3217620%2fwhy-does-this-pattern-in-powers-happen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
$a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b)$
$endgroup$
– Milan Stojanovic
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
1) in any consecutive pair of integer $m, m+1$, one of them is even, the other is odd. 2) an even number raised to power is an even number, an odd number raised to power is an odd number. 3) the difference of an odd and even number is odd.
$endgroup$
– achille hui
2 hours ago