How do I calculate my to-hit bonus when using the Great Weapon Master feat?Great Weapon Master + AssassinateIs there errata that lets the second benefit of the Great Weapon Master feat apply to versatile weapons (particularly for Small PCs)?Great Weapon Master Critical Hit ResolutionCan I Combine Shield Master and Great Weapon Master?Surprise, Assassinate, Dual Wield, Great Weapon Master loop and SkulkerIs there a way to make the Elven Accuracy feat work with the second benefit of Great Weapon Master?Can the Polearm Master 1d4 bonus attack be used with Great Weapon Fighter/Master?What conditions activate the Great Weapon Master feat?Is hitting creatures with Steel Wind Strike considered “using” a weapon?Can the Great Weapon Master feat's damage bonus and accuracy penalty apply to attacks from the Spiritual Weapon spell?

My Sixteen Friendly Students

While drilling into kitchen wall, hit a wire - any advice?

Is this strange Morse signal type common?

What is the oldest instrument ever?

How to avoid making self and former employee look bad when reporting on fixing former employee's work?

Should one save up to purchase a house/condo or maximize their 401(k) first?

How do I give a darkroom course without negatives from the attendees?

Why did Ham the Chimp push levers?

My parents are Afghan

Magical Modulo Squares

My perfect evil overlord plan... or is it?

What computer port is this?

I want to write a blog post building upon someone else's paper, how can I properly cite/credit them?

Why does this pattern in powers happen?

Add elements inside Array conditionally in JavaScript

How could a civilization detect tachyons?

Do these creatures from the Tomb of Annihilation campaign speak Common?

Company stopped paying my salary. What are my options?

Is there a need for better software for writers?

What dice to use in a game that revolves around triangles?

How can one see if an address is multisig?

What's an appropriate age to involve kids in life changing decisions?

Using mean length and mean weight to calculate mean BMI?

Gift for mentor after his thesis defense?



How do I calculate my to-hit bonus when using the Great Weapon Master feat?


Great Weapon Master + AssassinateIs there errata that lets the second benefit of the Great Weapon Master feat apply to versatile weapons (particularly for Small PCs)?Great Weapon Master Critical Hit ResolutionCan I Combine Shield Master and Great Weapon Master?Surprise, Assassinate, Dual Wield, Great Weapon Master loop and SkulkerIs there a way to make the Elven Accuracy feat work with the second benefit of Great Weapon Master?Can the Polearm Master 1d4 bonus attack be used with Great Weapon Fighter/Master?What conditions activate the Great Weapon Master feat?Is hitting creatures with Steel Wind Strike considered “using” a weapon?Can the Great Weapon Master feat's damage bonus and accuracy penalty apply to attacks from the Spiritual Weapon spell?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


I currently have a barbarian who is going to receive the Great Weapon Master feat. Looking over it, I have a question about the -5 to hit mentioned in the feat.



The second benefit of the Great Weapon Master feat (PHB, pg. 167)




Before you make a melee attack with a heavy weapon that you are proficient with, you can choose to take a -5 penalty to the attack roll. If the attack hits, you add +10 to the attack's damage.




Currently, I have a greataxe with a +5 modifier to the attack roll. My question regards the -5 to hit from the feat. Do I simply subtract it from the +5 of the axe, giving me +0 attack bonus overall? Or is my overall modifier on the attack roll just a -5?










share|improve this question









New contributor



user55328 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Is it the axe itself that has a +5 (which would be weird), or is it the barbarian? The barb might have a +3 strength modifier and a +2 proficiency bonus. Also, the -5 is optional and needs to be declared, you can have the feat and choose not to use it every turn.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesb
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know I can use it every turn, and it's the barbarian. Because what you said is right with the +3 in STR and +2 in proficiency.
    $endgroup$
    – user55328
    3 hours ago

















2












$begingroup$


I currently have a barbarian who is going to receive the Great Weapon Master feat. Looking over it, I have a question about the -5 to hit mentioned in the feat.



The second benefit of the Great Weapon Master feat (PHB, pg. 167)




Before you make a melee attack with a heavy weapon that you are proficient with, you can choose to take a -5 penalty to the attack roll. If the attack hits, you add +10 to the attack's damage.




Currently, I have a greataxe with a +5 modifier to the attack roll. My question regards the -5 to hit from the feat. Do I simply subtract it from the +5 of the axe, giving me +0 attack bonus overall? Or is my overall modifier on the attack roll just a -5?










share|improve this question









New contributor



user55328 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Is it the axe itself that has a +5 (which would be weird), or is it the barbarian? The barb might have a +3 strength modifier and a +2 proficiency bonus. Also, the -5 is optional and needs to be declared, you can have the feat and choose not to use it every turn.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesb
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know I can use it every turn, and it's the barbarian. Because what you said is right with the +3 in STR and +2 in proficiency.
    $endgroup$
    – user55328
    3 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


I currently have a barbarian who is going to receive the Great Weapon Master feat. Looking over it, I have a question about the -5 to hit mentioned in the feat.



The second benefit of the Great Weapon Master feat (PHB, pg. 167)




Before you make a melee attack with a heavy weapon that you are proficient with, you can choose to take a -5 penalty to the attack roll. If the attack hits, you add +10 to the attack's damage.




Currently, I have a greataxe with a +5 modifier to the attack roll. My question regards the -5 to hit from the feat. Do I simply subtract it from the +5 of the axe, giving me +0 attack bonus overall? Or is my overall modifier on the attack roll just a -5?










share|improve this question









New contributor



user55328 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




I currently have a barbarian who is going to receive the Great Weapon Master feat. Looking over it, I have a question about the -5 to hit mentioned in the feat.



The second benefit of the Great Weapon Master feat (PHB, pg. 167)




Before you make a melee attack with a heavy weapon that you are proficient with, you can choose to take a -5 penalty to the attack roll. If the attack hits, you add +10 to the attack's damage.




Currently, I have a greataxe with a +5 modifier to the attack roll. My question regards the -5 to hit from the feat. Do I simply subtract it from the +5 of the axe, giving me +0 attack bonus overall? Or is my overall modifier on the attack roll just a -5?







dnd-5e feats weapons barbarian






share|improve this question









New contributor



user55328 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



user55328 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









V2Blast

29k5105176




29k5105176






New contributor



user55328 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 4 hours ago









user55328user55328

113




113




New contributor



user55328 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




user55328 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • $begingroup$
    Is it the axe itself that has a +5 (which would be weird), or is it the barbarian? The barb might have a +3 strength modifier and a +2 proficiency bonus. Also, the -5 is optional and needs to be declared, you can have the feat and choose not to use it every turn.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesb
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know I can use it every turn, and it's the barbarian. Because what you said is right with the +3 in STR and +2 in proficiency.
    $endgroup$
    – user55328
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Is it the axe itself that has a +5 (which would be weird), or is it the barbarian? The barb might have a +3 strength modifier and a +2 proficiency bonus. Also, the -5 is optional and needs to be declared, you can have the feat and choose not to use it every turn.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesb
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know I can use it every turn, and it's the barbarian. Because what you said is right with the +3 in STR and +2 in proficiency.
    $endgroup$
    – user55328
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
Is it the axe itself that has a +5 (which would be weird), or is it the barbarian? The barb might have a +3 strength modifier and a +2 proficiency bonus. Also, the -5 is optional and needs to be declared, you can have the feat and choose not to use it every turn.
$endgroup$
– jamesb
3 hours ago





$begingroup$
Is it the axe itself that has a +5 (which would be weird), or is it the barbarian? The barb might have a +3 strength modifier and a +2 proficiency bonus. Also, the -5 is optional and needs to be declared, you can have the feat and choose not to use it every turn.
$endgroup$
– jamesb
3 hours ago













$begingroup$
I know I can use it every turn, and it's the barbarian. Because what you said is right with the +3 in STR and +2 in proficiency.
$endgroup$
– user55328
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
I know I can use it every turn, and it's the barbarian. Because what you said is right with the +3 in STR and +2 in proficiency.
$endgroup$
– user55328
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

You would combine them with any other pertinent modifiers and, assuming none else, end up at a final attack modifier of +0.



The penalty from Great Weapon Master doesn't replace, overwrite, or modify any other modifiers you might have. Few if any modifiers do, and they would almost certainly state outright that they did so, as that would be highly unusual.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I appreciate the acceptance, but the question is less than an hour old. We generally try to hold off on accepting answers until the question is at least a day old, in order to allow experts in other time zones (who may have a better answer) a chance to participate.
    $endgroup$
    – sevenbrokenbricks
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Alright, my bad.
    $endgroup$
    – user55328
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user55328 It's not so much "your bad" it is advice not a policy. For some questions not selecting an answer can promote more answers. This is a case where there is a single correct answer and it has been provided. You are welcome to accept answers as you choose. You can also change your accepted answer at any time. In general it can be a good idea to wait at least 24 hours but you are free to ignore it.
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    See also rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/8618/23970 on the topic of waiting to accept.
    $endgroup$
    – nitsua60
    2 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






user55328 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147611%2fhow-do-i-calculate-my-to-hit-bonus-when-using-the-great-weapon-master-feat%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6












$begingroup$

You would combine them with any other pertinent modifiers and, assuming none else, end up at a final attack modifier of +0.



The penalty from Great Weapon Master doesn't replace, overwrite, or modify any other modifiers you might have. Few if any modifiers do, and they would almost certainly state outright that they did so, as that would be highly unusual.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I appreciate the acceptance, but the question is less than an hour old. We generally try to hold off on accepting answers until the question is at least a day old, in order to allow experts in other time zones (who may have a better answer) a chance to participate.
    $endgroup$
    – sevenbrokenbricks
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Alright, my bad.
    $endgroup$
    – user55328
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user55328 It's not so much "your bad" it is advice not a policy. For some questions not selecting an answer can promote more answers. This is a case where there is a single correct answer and it has been provided. You are welcome to accept answers as you choose. You can also change your accepted answer at any time. In general it can be a good idea to wait at least 24 hours but you are free to ignore it.
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    See also rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/8618/23970 on the topic of waiting to accept.
    $endgroup$
    – nitsua60
    2 hours ago















6












$begingroup$

You would combine them with any other pertinent modifiers and, assuming none else, end up at a final attack modifier of +0.



The penalty from Great Weapon Master doesn't replace, overwrite, or modify any other modifiers you might have. Few if any modifiers do, and they would almost certainly state outright that they did so, as that would be highly unusual.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I appreciate the acceptance, but the question is less than an hour old. We generally try to hold off on accepting answers until the question is at least a day old, in order to allow experts in other time zones (who may have a better answer) a chance to participate.
    $endgroup$
    – sevenbrokenbricks
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Alright, my bad.
    $endgroup$
    – user55328
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user55328 It's not so much "your bad" it is advice not a policy. For some questions not selecting an answer can promote more answers. This is a case where there is a single correct answer and it has been provided. You are welcome to accept answers as you choose. You can also change your accepted answer at any time. In general it can be a good idea to wait at least 24 hours but you are free to ignore it.
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    See also rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/8618/23970 on the topic of waiting to accept.
    $endgroup$
    – nitsua60
    2 hours ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$

You would combine them with any other pertinent modifiers and, assuming none else, end up at a final attack modifier of +0.



The penalty from Great Weapon Master doesn't replace, overwrite, or modify any other modifiers you might have. Few if any modifiers do, and they would almost certainly state outright that they did so, as that would be highly unusual.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



You would combine them with any other pertinent modifiers and, assuming none else, end up at a final attack modifier of +0.



The penalty from Great Weapon Master doesn't replace, overwrite, or modify any other modifiers you might have. Few if any modifiers do, and they would almost certainly state outright that they did so, as that would be highly unusual.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 3 hours ago

























answered 4 hours ago









sevenbrokenbrickssevenbrokenbricks

3,099930




3,099930











  • $begingroup$
    I appreciate the acceptance, but the question is less than an hour old. We generally try to hold off on accepting answers until the question is at least a day old, in order to allow experts in other time zones (who may have a better answer) a chance to participate.
    $endgroup$
    – sevenbrokenbricks
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Alright, my bad.
    $endgroup$
    – user55328
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user55328 It's not so much "your bad" it is advice not a policy. For some questions not selecting an answer can promote more answers. This is a case where there is a single correct answer and it has been provided. You are welcome to accept answers as you choose. You can also change your accepted answer at any time. In general it can be a good idea to wait at least 24 hours but you are free to ignore it.
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    See also rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/8618/23970 on the topic of waiting to accept.
    $endgroup$
    – nitsua60
    2 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    I appreciate the acceptance, but the question is less than an hour old. We generally try to hold off on accepting answers until the question is at least a day old, in order to allow experts in other time zones (who may have a better answer) a chance to participate.
    $endgroup$
    – sevenbrokenbricks
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Alright, my bad.
    $endgroup$
    – user55328
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user55328 It's not so much "your bad" it is advice not a policy. For some questions not selecting an answer can promote more answers. This is a case where there is a single correct answer and it has been provided. You are welcome to accept answers as you choose. You can also change your accepted answer at any time. In general it can be a good idea to wait at least 24 hours but you are free to ignore it.
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    See also rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/8618/23970 on the topic of waiting to accept.
    $endgroup$
    – nitsua60
    2 hours ago















$begingroup$
I appreciate the acceptance, but the question is less than an hour old. We generally try to hold off on accepting answers until the question is at least a day old, in order to allow experts in other time zones (who may have a better answer) a chance to participate.
$endgroup$
– sevenbrokenbricks
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
I appreciate the acceptance, but the question is less than an hour old. We generally try to hold off on accepting answers until the question is at least a day old, in order to allow experts in other time zones (who may have a better answer) a chance to participate.
$endgroup$
– sevenbrokenbricks
3 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Alright, my bad.
$endgroup$
– user55328
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Alright, my bad.
$endgroup$
– user55328
3 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
@user55328 It's not so much "your bad" it is advice not a policy. For some questions not selecting an answer can promote more answers. This is a case where there is a single correct answer and it has been provided. You are welcome to accept answers as you choose. You can also change your accepted answer at any time. In general it can be a good idea to wait at least 24 hours but you are free to ignore it.
$endgroup$
– linksassin
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@user55328 It's not so much "your bad" it is advice not a policy. For some questions not selecting an answer can promote more answers. This is a case where there is a single correct answer and it has been provided. You are welcome to accept answers as you choose. You can also change your accepted answer at any time. In general it can be a good idea to wait at least 24 hours but you are free to ignore it.
$endgroup$
– linksassin
3 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
See also rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/8618/23970 on the topic of waiting to accept.
$endgroup$
– nitsua60
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
See also rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/8618/23970 on the topic of waiting to accept.
$endgroup$
– nitsua60
2 hours ago










user55328 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















user55328 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












user55328 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











user55328 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147611%2fhow-do-i-calculate-my-to-hit-bonus-when-using-the-great-weapon-master-feat%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її